(PC) Reed, Et Al v. Kern County Department of Court, Et Al - Document No. 4
Uploaded by
Justia.com(PC) Reed, Et Al v. Kern County Department of Court, Et Al - Document No. 4
Uploaded by
Justia.com(PC) Reed, et al v. Kern County Department of Court, et al Doc.
Case 1:06-cv-01600-OWW-SMS Document 4 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 2
8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 M. DEAN REED PRODUCTION
CORP and MARY DEAN REED,
11
Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-06-2399 DFL DAD P
12
vs.
13
KERN COUNTY DEPT OF COURT,
14 et al.,
15 Defendants. ORDER
16 /
17 On October 31, 2006, plaintiff Mary Dean Reed, a pretrial detainee confined in
18 the Lerdo Women’s Pretrial Detention Center, filed a pro se complaint that has been construed by
19 the Clerk of the Court as a civil rights complaint filed by a prisoner seeking relief pursuant to 42
20 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 2, 2006, plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma
21 pauperis.1
22 In her complaint, plaintiff lists numerous government entities, all located in Kern
23 County or Los Angeles County, as defendants. Plaintiff alleges that Kern County and Los
24
25 1
The certificate section of the form has not been completed by plaintiff’s institution of
confinement, and no certified trust account statement has been provided by the institution. See
26 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:06-cv-01600-OWW-SMS Document 4 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 2
1 Angeles County engaged in a conspiracy against her.2 Kern County is part of the Fresno Division
2 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 3-
3 120(d). A civil action that has not been commenced in the proper division of this court may, on
4 the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. See Local Rule 3-
5 120(f). This action will therefore be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court for further
6 proceedings.
7 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
8 1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
9 District of California sitting in Fresno; and
10 2. All future filings shall reference only the new Fresno case number to be
11 assigned to this case and shall be filed at:
12 United States District Court
Eastern District of California
13 2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
14
15 DATED: November 8, 2006.
16
17
18
19 DAD:13:bb
reed2399.22
20
21
22
23
24
25
2
On October 30, 2006, plaintiff filed two actions against the same defendants: 2:06-cv-
26 2386 MCE GGH PS and 2:06-cv-2387 MCE DAD PS.
