0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views2 pages

Cote Et Al v. Nicholson - Document No. 5

ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 2 is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Hearing 3 is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge McCoun, who shall submit proposed findings of fact and recommendation as to the appropriate disposition of the motion. Signed by Judge James S. Moody Jr. on 8/29/2007. (len) 8:2007cv01524 Florida Middle District Court

Uploaded by

Justia.com
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views2 pages

Cote Et Al v. Nicholson - Document No. 5

ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 2 is DENIED. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Hearing 3 is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge McCoun, who shall submit proposed findings of fact and recommendation as to the appropriate disposition of the motion. Signed by Judge James S. Moody Jr. on 8/29/2007. (len) 8:2007cv01524 Florida Middle District Court

Uploaded by

Justia.com
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Cote et al v. Nicholson Doc.

5
Case 8:07-cv-01524-JSM-TBM Document 5 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION

CLAUDIA G. COTE, M.D.; DIANE T.


GOWSKI, M.D.; and SALLY B.
ZACHARIAH, M.D.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 8:07-cv-1524-T-30TBM

R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary,


Department of Veterans Affairs,

Defendant.
_____________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary

Restraining Order (Dkt. 2), and Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Hearing (Dkt. 3).

Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the Bay Pines VA Health Care System from suspending or

terminating the employment of Dr. Diane T. Gowski or Dr. Sally B. Zachariah without

further order of this Court.

Plaintiffs’ counsel has indicated that he has served a copy of the complaint, the motion

for temporary restraining order and memorandum in support thereof, exhibits, a proposed

order, and a motion for preliminary injunction on Defendant’s counsel via email. However,

Defendant has not had the opportunity to respond to Plaintiffs’ Motions or be heard in the

case. The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ Motions, determines that Plaintiffs are not

threatened with irreparable injury so imminent that notice and a hearing on the application

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 8:07-cv-01524-JSM-TBM Document 5 Filed 08/29/2007 Page 2 of 2

for preliminary injunction is impractical, if not impossible, pursuant to Rule 65(b),

Fed.R.Civ.P., and Local Rule 4.05(b)(2) of the M.D.Fla.

It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 2) is DENIED.

2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(1)(B), Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary

Injunction and Hearing (Dkt. 3) is hereby REFERRED to the Honorable

Thomas B. McCoun, III, who shall submit proposed findings of fact and

recommendation as to the appropriate disposition of the motion.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on August 29, 2007.

Copies furnished to:


Counsel/Parties of Record

S:\Even\2007\07-cv-1524.tro.wpd

Page 2 of 2

You might also like