Scribd
Upload
42 views1 page

Right To Information

The document discusses two Philippine Supreme Court cases regarding the right to access public records and information. Baldoza vs. Dimaano establishes that the public has a legitimate interest and right to information on matters of social and political significance under the Philippine Constitution. Valmonte vs. Belmonte further finds that the right to information enhances citizen participation in governance and checks abuse, but is not absolute and is subject to limitations provided by law. The right to information must involve matters of public concern or interest for a legal mandate to be issued to access information.

Uploaded by

MylaCambri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
42 views1 page

Right To Information

The document discusses two Philippine Supreme Court cases regarding the right to access public records and information. Baldoza vs. Dimaano establishes that the public has a legitimate interest and right to information on matters of social and political significance under the Philippine Constitution. Valmonte vs. Belmonte further finds that the right to information enhances citizen participation in governance and checks abuse, but is not absolute and is subject to limitations provided by law. The right to information must involve matters of public concern or interest for a legal mandate to be issued to access information.

Uploaded by

MylaCambri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Baldoza vs.

Dimaano
The access to public records is predicated on the right of the people to acquire information on
matters of public concern. Undoubtedly in a democracy, the public has a legitimate interest in matters of
social and political significance. The New Constitution expressly recognizes that the people are entitled to
information on matters of public concern and thus are expressly granted access to official records, as well
as documents of official acts, or transactions, or decisions, subject to such limitations imposed by law.
The incorporation of this right in the Constitution is a recognition of the fundamental role of free
exchange of information in a democracy. There can be no realistic perception by the public of the nation's
problems, nor a meaningful democratic decision-making if they are denied access to information of
general interest. Information is needed to enable the members of society to cope with the exigencies of
the times.
Valmonte vs. Belmonte
The right to information is an essential premise of a meaningful right to speech and expression.
But this is not to say that the right to information is merely an adjunct of and therefore restricted in
application by the exercise of the freedoms of speech and of the press. Far from it. The right to
information goes hand-in-hand with the constitutional policies of full public disclosure and honesty in the
public service. It is meant to enhance the widening role of the citizenry in governmental decision-making
as well in checking abuse in government. Yet, like all the constitutional guarantees, the right to
information is not absolute. As stated in Legaspi, The people's right to information is limited to "matters
of public concern", and is further "subject to such limitations as may be provided by law." Similarly, the
State's policy of full disclosure is limited to "transactions involving public interest", and is "subject to
reasonable conditions prescribed by law." Hence, before mandamus may issue, it must be clear that the
information sought is of "public interest" or "public concern", and is not exempted by law from the
operation of the constitutional guarantee.

You might also like