Scribd
Upload
34 views

Peer

This rubric evaluates eportfolios based on four criteria: introduction of artifacts, selection of artifacts, reflection on learning, and connection to future learning. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being exemplary and 1 being unsatisfactory. The rubric provides detailed descriptions of the characteristics and quality expected for a score at each level for each criterion. Navigation, readability, and writing are also evaluated separately on a scale from 1-4 based on factors such as organization, formatting, and grammar.

Uploaded by

api-292130461
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
34 views

Peer

This rubric evaluates eportfolios based on four criteria: introduction of artifacts, selection of artifacts, reflection on learning, and connection to future learning. Each criterion is scored on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being exemplary and 1 being unsatisfactory. The rubric provides detailed descriptions of the characteristics and quality expected for a score at each level for each criterion. Navigation, readability, and writing are also evaluated separately on a scale from 1-4 based on factors such as organization, formatting, and grammar.

Uploaded by

api-292130461
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Criteria

Exemplary
-4

Proficient 3

Limited - 2

Unsatisfactory 1

Points

Introduction of
Artifacts

Artifacts are
accompanied by
an introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.
Selection of
Artifacts
Selects artifacts
that support the
purpose of the
eportfolio and
the
skills/abilities
demonstrated in
each section.
Reflection on
Learning
Reflections on
each
page/section
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

All artifacts are


accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.

Most of the
artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.

Some of the
artifacts are
accompanied by
an Introduction
that clearly
explains what
the item is, why
it was created,
and why its
important.

No artifacts are
accompanied by an
Introduction that clearly
explains what the item
is, why it was created,
and why its important.

All artifacts and


work samples
are clearly and
directly related
to the purpose
of the eportfolio.
The eportfolio
includes a wide
variety of
artifacts.
All reflections
clearly describe
the learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

Most artifacts
and work
samples are
related to the
purpose of the
eportfolio. The
eportfolio
includes a
variety of
artifacts.
Most of the
reflections
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

Some of the
artifacts and
work samples
are related to
the purpose of
the eportfolio.
The eportfolio
includes some
variety of
artifacts.
A few of the
reflections
describe the
learning (i.e.
skills, abilities,
growth,
achievement,
accomplishment
s) that occurred
from producing
the artifacts.

The artifacts and work


samples do not relate to
the purpose of the
eportfolio. The eportfolio
does not include a
variety of artifacts.

The reflections do not


describe the learning
(i.e. skills, abilities,
growth, achievement,
accomplishments) that
occurred from producing
the artifacts.

Criteria

Exemplary
-4

Proficient - 3

Limited - 2

Unsatisfactory
-1

Points

Connection to Future
Learning

Reflections illustrate the ability


to effectively critique the work
and identify areas for
continued learning.
Navigation and Readability
The organization of the
eportfolio and how to navigate
to various sections/pages is
clearly indicated.

Page layout (including


headings, font size and color,
whitespace, and other text
formatting make the eportfolio
and artifacts easy to read.

Writing is clear and free of


grammatical, spelling, and
punctuation errors.

All reflections
illustrate the ability
to effectively
critique work, and
include goals for
continued learning
(long and short term
The various parts of
the portfolio are
labeled, clearly
organized and allow
the reader to easily
locate an artifact
and move to related
pages or a different
section.

Color, background,
font styles (italic,
bold, underline) and
type size for
headings, subheadings and text
are used
consistently and
enhance the
readability
throughout the
eportfolio. Horizontal
and vertical white
space alignment is
used appropriately
to organize content.

The writing is clear


and free of
grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation errors.

Most of the reflections


illustrate the ability to
effectively critique work,
and include goals for
continued learning (long
and short term).

A few reflections
illustrate the ability to
effectively critique
work, and include
goals for continued
learning (long and
short term).
The navigation links
are somewhat
confusing, and it is
often unclear how to
locate an artifact or
move to related pages
or a different section.
Some of the external
links do not connect
to the appropriate
website or file.

The eportfolio is often


difficult to read due to
inappropriate use of
fonts and type size for
headings, subheadings and text or
inconsistent use of
font styles (italic,
bold, underline). Color
of background, fonts,
and links decreases
the readability of the
text and used
inconsistently in some
places throughout the
eportfolio. Horizontal
and vertical white
space alignment is
sometimes used
inappropriately to
organize content.

The writing includes


include some
grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors
that distract the
reader.

The reflections do not


illustrate the ability to
effectively critique work or
include goals for continued
learning (long and short
term).

The navigation links are


confusing, and it is difficult
to locate artifacts and
move to related pages or a
different section. Many of
the external links do not
connect to the appropriate
website or file.

The eportfolio is difficult to


read due to inappropriate
use of fonts, type size for
headings, sub-headings
and text and font styles
(italic, bold, underline).
Color of background, fonts,
and links decreases the
readability of the text, is
distracting and used
inconsistently throughout
the eportfolio. Horizontal
and vertical white space
alignment is used
inappropriately, and the
content appears
disorganized and cluttered.

Numerous grammatical,
spelling or punctuation
errors hinder effective
communication and
distract the reader.

NOTE: By looking at
your ePortfolio I think
you should go and read
the rubric in DocSharing
and maybe that will
help you develop a
better webpage. Also
Dr. Wolfe asked for the
assignments to be
embedded not
downloaded.

The navigation links


generally function well,
but it is not always clear
how to locate an artifact
or move to related pages
or different section.

Color, background, font


styles, and type size for
headings, sub-headings
and text are generally
used consistently
throughout the eportfolio.
Horizontal and vertical
white space alignment is
generally used
appropriately to organize
content.

The writing is largely free


of grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors.

You might also like