Scribd
Upload
96 views

Loreto-Go Vs Comelec

This document summarizes a Supreme Court case regarding the filing of an affidavit of withdrawal of candidacy. The petitioner filed certificates of candidacy for both mayor and governor but attempted to withdraw her mayoral candidacy. The election officer refused to accept the withdrawal and suggested filing it with the municipal election officer where she first filed. Due to time constraints, she faxed the withdrawal. The Commission on Elections declared her ineligible for both positions. The Supreme Court ruled that the law does not require filing the withdrawal with the same office as the certificate, and her fax withdrawal was valid. It annulled the COMELEC's resolution and declared her governor candidacy valid.

Uploaded by

tynapay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
96 views

Loreto-Go Vs Comelec

This document summarizes a Supreme Court case regarding the filing of an affidavit of withdrawal of candidacy. The petitioner filed certificates of candidacy for both mayor and governor but attempted to withdraw her mayoral candidacy. The election officer refused to accept the withdrawal and suggested filing it with the municipal election officer where she first filed. Due to time constraints, she faxed the withdrawal. The Commission on Elections declared her ineligible for both positions. The Supreme Court ruled that the law does not require filing the withdrawal with the same office as the certificate, and her fax withdrawal was valid. It annulled the COMELEC's resolution and declared her governor candidacy valid.

Uploaded by

tynapay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

G.R. No.

147741

May 10, 2001

REP. MA. CATALINA L. GO, petitioner, vs.COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,


FELIPE V. MONTEJO and ARVIN V. ANTONI, respondents.
FACTS:
Petitioner is the incumbent representative of the Fifth District, province of
Leyte, whose term of office will expire at noon on 30 June 2001.
On 27 February 2001, petitioner filed with the municipal election officer of the
municipality of Baybay, Leyte, a certificate of candidacy for mayor of Baybay,
Leyte.
On 28 February 2001, at 11:47 p.m., petitioner filed with the provincial
election supervisor of Leyte, with office at Tacloban City, another certificate of
candidacy for governor of the province of Leyte. Simultaneously therewith,
she attempted to file with the provincial election supervisor an affidavit of
withdrawal of her candidacy for mayor of the municipality of Baybay, Leyte.
Hiowever, the provincial election supervisor of Leyte refused to accept the
affidavit of withdrawal and suggested that, pursuant to a COMELEC
resolution, she should file it with the municipal election officer of Baybay,
Leyte where she filed her certificate of candidacy for mayor. At that later
hour, with only minutes left to midnight, the deadline for filing certificates of
candidacy or withdrawal thereof, and considering that the travel time from
Tacloban to Baybay was two (2) hours, petitioner decided to send her affidavit
of withdrawal by fax to her father at Baybay, Leyte and the latter submitted
the same to the office of the election officer of Baybay, Leyte at 12:28 a.m.,
01 March 2001. On the same day, at 1:15 p.m., the election officer of Baybay
Leyte, received the original of the affidavit of withdrawal.
On 05 March 2001 respondent Montejo filed with the provincial election
supervisor of Leyte, at Tacloban City a petition to deny due course and/or to
cancel the certificates of candidacy of petitioner. 7 Respondent Antoni filed a
similar petitions, namely, that for mayor of Baybay, Leyte, and that for
governor of Leyte, thus, making her ineligible for both.
ISSUE:
WON the affidavit of withdrawal must be filed with the election officer of the
place where the certificate of candidacy was filed.
HELD: NO.
There is nothing in Section 73, Batas Pambansa Bilang 881 which mandates
that the affidavit of withdrawal must be filed with the same office where the
certificate of candidacy to be withdrawn was filed. Thus, it can be filed
directly with the main office of the COMELEC, the office of the regional
election director concerned, the office of the provincial election supervisor of
the province to which the municipality involved belongs, or the office of the
municipal election officer of the said municipality.
While it may be true that Section 12 of COMELEC Resolution No. 3253-A,
adopted on 20 November 2000, requires that the withdrawal be filed before
the election officer of the place where the certificate of candidacy was filed,

such requirement is merely directory, and is intended for convenience. It is


not mandatory or jurisdictional. An administrative resolution can not
contradict, much less amend or repeal a law, or supply a deficiency in the
law. Hence, the filing of petitioner's affidavit of withdrawal of candidacy for
mayor of Baybay with the provincial election supervisor of Leyte sufficed to
effectively withdraw such candidacy. the COMELEC thus acted with grave
abuse of discretion when it declare petitioner ineligible for both positions for
which she filed certificates of candidacy.
The Court GRANTS the petition. The Court ANNULS COMELEC Resolution No.
3982, adopted on 23 April 2001, and DECLARES valid petitioner's certificate
of candidacy for Governor of Leyte.

You might also like