Course Outline - Partnership
Course Outline - Partnership
BUSINESS ORGANIZATION I
(Partnership, Agency and Trust)
Atty. Joanne L. Ranada
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Week No. 1
I. PARTNERSHIP
A. General Provisions (Art. 1767-1783)
1. What is a contract of partnership? (Art. 1767)
- Santos vs. Sps. Reyes, 368 SCRA 261
2. Determining factors in the existence of partnership (Art. 1769)
-Heirs of Tan Eng Kee vs. CA, 341 SCRA 740
(citing Evangelista vs. Collector of Internal Revenue, 54 O.G. 996)
-Negado vs. Makabenta, 54 O.G. 4082
-Yulo vs. Yang Chiaco Seng, L-12541, Aug. 28, 1959
3. Distinction between partnership and a private corporation
- 1 Fletcher, Cyc. Corp., Sec. 20
4. Formalities required by law for the organization/constitution of partnership
(Art. 1771, 1772, 1773, 1843)
Week No. 2
5. Different kinds of partnership
a) As to object (Art. 1777, 1778, 1780, 1783)
i.
ii.
Universal Partnership
Particular Partnership
Week No. 3
B. Obligations of the Partners (Art. 1784-1827)
1. Obligations of the partners among themselves (Art. 1784-1809)
a) Distribution of profits and losses of partnership
i.
ii.
With agreement
Without agreement
Week No. 8
II. AGENCY
A. Historical Context
1. World Context
2. Philippine Context
-Laws 28 and 32, Title 12, Partida 3
-Spanish Civil Code (Civil Agency)
-Spanish Code of Commerce (Commercial Agency)
-Civil Code Art. 2270 (2)
B. Nature, Concept and Purpose
1. Agency as a contract
a) Definition (Art. 1868)
i. Critique/ Articles
-Espiritu, XV Lawyers Journal 297
- J.B.L. Reyes, XVI Lawyers Journal 138
ii. Other definitions
h) Broker
- Pacific Commercial Co. v. Yatco, 68 Phil. 398
i)
Guardianship
- 2 C.J.S. 1027
- 3 AmJur 2d 421
- Fessenden v. Jones, 75 Am. Dec. 445
- McDonald v. spring Valley, 120 N.E. 476, 2 ALR 1355
j)
Bailment
- 2 C.J.S. 1027
k) Ship Agent
- Switzerland Genral Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Ramirez, 96 SCRA 297
Week No.10
C. Kinds, Creation and Existence
1. General Classification
a) Actual Agency (Art. 1868)
b) Apparent or Ostensible Agency (Art. 1873)
-J.B.L. Reyes 16 Lawyers Journal 138
-Rallos v. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269
-Compaia General de Tabacos v. Diaba, 20 Phil. 321
c) Agency by Estoppel
- 2 C.J. 444-445
- 2 C.J. 464-466
- Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 553
2. Kinds of Actual Agency
a) As to manner of creation (Art. 1869)
b) As to character (Art. 1875)
c) As to extent (Art. 1876)
d) As to scope of authority (Art. 1877, 1878)
3. Creation and Elements of Actual Agency
a) Consent/ Mandate
i. Manifestation of Mandate
- Express (Art. 1869, 1874)
- Implied
- Conde v. CA, 199 SCRA 245
ii. Manifestation of Acceptance
-Express (Art. 1869, 1870)
-Implied (Art. 1870-1872)
- Jimenez v. Rabot, 38 Phil. 357
- Lian v. Puno, 31 Phil. 259
- Katigbak v. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil. 622
- Amigo v. Teves, 96 Phil. 252
- Villa v. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil. 126
- Dir. Of Public Works v. Sing Juco, 53 Phil. 205
- BPI v. De Coster, 47 Phil. 594
- Germann & Co. v. Donaldson, 1 Phil. 63
- Macke v. Camps, 7 Phil. 533
- Municipal Council of Iloilo v. Evangelista, 55 Phil.290
- Yu Chuck v. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil. 608
- Insular Drug v. PNB, 58 Phil. 683
Week No. 11
D. Obligations of the Agent
-Intl Films (China) v. Lyric Films Exchange, 63 Phil. 778
-Nepomuceno, et al. v. Heredia, 7 Phil. 563
-Domingo v. Domingo, 42 SCRA 131
-U.S. vs. Kiene, 7 Phil. 736
-U.S. v. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791
-Ojinaga v. Estate of Perez, 9 Phil. 185
-De Borja v. De Borja, 58 Phil. 811
-PNB v. Welch,Ffairchild, & Co., 44 Phil. 780
-Harry Keeler Electric Co. v. Rodriguez, 44 Phil. 19
-Austria v. CA, 39 SCRA 527
E. Obligations of the Principal
-Gonzales & Gomez v. Haberer, 47 Phil. 380
-Albaladejo y Cia. Phil. Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556
Week 12
F. Modes of Extinguishment of Agency
-Barretto v. Santa Maria, 26 Phil. 440
-Coleongco v. Claparols, 10 SCRA 577
-De Buncio & Co. v. Ong Guan Gan, 60 Phil. 696
-New Manila Lumber Co., Inc. v. Republic, 107 Phil. 824
-Infante v. Cunanan, 93 Phil. 693
-Valera v. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695
-Buason and Reyes v. Panuyas, 105 Phil. 795
-Herrera, et al. v. Luy Kim Guam, 110 Phil. 1020
-Del Rosario v. Abad, 104 Phil. 648