0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views

Calibration Protocol: Purpose

This document provides a protocol for calibrating the scoring of student work. It outlines the purpose, planning, process, roles, and norms for a group discussion to calibrate understanding and application of a rubric when assessing student work.

Uploaded by

jkclements
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views

Calibration Protocol: Purpose

This document provides a protocol for calibrating the scoring of student work. It outlines the purpose, planning, process, roles, and norms for a group discussion to calibrate understanding and application of a rubric when assessing student work.

Uploaded by

jkclements
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

TOOL

www.qualityperformanceassessment.org

QP
A

Quality
Performance
Assessment

Calibration Protocol
Purpose
To calibrate our scoring of student work as we explore the instructional implications of the prompt/task, student work,
and rubric.

Planning
Time: 35-40 minutes
Group size: 48
Materials needed for each person:
o Sample work and prompt/task
o Task rubric
o Score sheet or task rubric can be used for scoring
o One extra score sheet is needed for the recorder, who will tally the scores for the whole group.
Roles: Choose a facilitator, timekeeper, and recorder. (1 minute)

Setting Norms
Honor our learning and be respectful of the work of the teacher and the student.
Keep the conversation constructive; avoid judgmental language.
Be appreciative of the facilitators role and follow the guidelines and time constraints.
Keep feedback crisp and to the point.
Dont skip the debrief process.

Process
1

Norms: The facilitator reviews the protocol process and norms with the group. (2 minutes)

E
 xamination: Group members silently examine the prompt, student work, the rubric, and the score sheet.
(3 minutes)

C
 larifying questions: The group asks any clarifying questions they have about the materials and process.
(2 minutes)

R
 ead and score: Using the rubric, group members independently and silently read and score the student work,
recording their scores on the score sheet and making notes to justify their scores. (10 minutes)

S
 core sharing: One at a time, team members share their scores for each of the rubric categorieswithout
explanationas the recorder completes the groups score sheet. (2 minutes)

D
 iscussion: Facilitator invites the group to consider where the differences in the scores occurred and why
people scored differently for each rubric areaparticularly the highest and lowest scores. (Approximately
2 minutes per criterion: 8 minutes)

D
 ebrief: Discuss the following questions (approximately 2 minutes per question: 8 minutes):
o What did we notice about scoring student work and the rubric?
o What would be the next steps for instructing this student?
o What revisions should be made to the task and instructions?
o What are the implications for our instructional practice?

PAGE | T9

2012 Center for Collaborative Education. Permission to reproduce and use is given when authorship is fully cited.

You might also like