Ethical Considerations in Legal Research: Primary Secondary
Ethical Considerations in Legal Research: Primary Secondary
Plagiarism
Definition and its different forms
Academic writing vs judicial writing (In re Del Castillo)
Acad: Intent is not a defense. (Intent as an element)
Judicial Writing: Intent is to carry out the purposes of justice (Professional
responsibility)
Other unethical conduct (Hipos, Allied Banking, COMELEC Cases)
Imprecise/misleading attribution (
Misquoting decisions
Controlling text: decision vs syllabus (commentary by publisher)
Duties
CPR: Rules 1.01, 10.01, 10.02
Sources of law
Statutory - Constitution, Legislative Enactments, Treaties & International Agreements, Admin
Rules & Regulations, Ordinances
Case Law (Articles & Civil Code) - SC, Appellate Courts, Interior Courts, Substantive Decisions
(Quasi-Judicial)
Classification by authority
1. Primary Authority - Contain actual law and judicial decisions; exact copies of statutes,
ordinances, and reports of judicial decisions
2. Secondary Authority - Restatements, critiques, commentaries
Classification by Source
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
E.g. (Legislative Enactments) - Official Gazette Published by the National Printing Office; Laws and
Resolutions - Book compiled and published by
Congress
STATUTORY SOURCES
Common law v Civil Law Jurisdictions (Max Shoop)
PH Legal system = civil law
Historically,
Applicability of common law principles: insofar as they are (1) founded on principles
applicable t local conditions (2) not in conflict with existing laws (3) conformable to
existing institutions
CONSTITUTION
Expression of sovereignty by the Filipino people (plebiscite)
Supreme law of the land, against the validity of all other laws are measured
Determine scope of mandate and authority of different branches of law (Angara; In re
Cunanan/Bar Flunkers)
Doctrine of Constitutional Supremacy (Tawang)
How does a bill become law? (ART 6, SEC 27)
Effectivity of Laws (ART 2, CC)
Publication in official gazette is prima facie evidence of authority of the law or issue
Ignorance of the law excuses no one
Operation and Effect of Laws
Prospectively as a general rule
Express repeal - express revival
Implied repeal - Implicit revival, unless otherwise provided
ADMINISTRATIVE RULE
Must be published
Internal use
QOL
Minute resolutions
judicial decision v minute resolution (Phil Health Care Providers)
JD
MR
- Modified T or F
- Essay
- Bonus (10 pts): What is the difference between academic legal writing and judicial writing?
MIDTERM PREPARATION WORKSHOP
Guidelines in analyzing a legal problem
1. Read the problem. Take note of any ideas that occur to you the 1st time you read it. (Initially,
take a look at the question following the narration of facts. Mark facts you think may be relevant
in resolving the question)
2. Read the problem a 2nd time, this time more carefully. Dont start writing until you have read
the problem at least twice, making sure you have understood the true import of the question.
Thought Logic
1. What is the question being asked? (Your mental outline of potential answer must be
RESPONSIVE to the question)
2. What are the issues relevant to the question being asked?
3. What are the material facts? How do the issues relate to the facts?
4. What are the applicable principles, rules, laws, jurisprudence? (ALWAYS CITE YOUR LEGAL
BASIS)
5. How do these apply to the facts?
6. What is the answer to the question?
The IRAC Approach
ISSUES - Precise legal question that must be answered in order to resolve the case
RULE - After identifying the issue, identify the applicable legal RULES, PRINCIPLES, AND
JURISPRUDENCE. Start by explaining the controlling legal principles.
If this is an issue of 1st impression: explain what rules apply
If several cases apply: Summarize the conflict
APPLICATION OF RULE TO FACTS
CONCLUSION
WRITING YOUR ANSWER
Prepare an outline. Prepare an outline of what you intend t say, and take the time to review and
refine it before proceeding to write. Write when you are confident enough with your answer. (Does it
answer the question completely? Does it have basis in law or jurisprudence?)
1st Par: Answer the issue posed (A one-line conclusion. YES/NO, short answer why.)
2nd Par: State the rule of law (Statute, case, legal principle, or a combination)
3rd Par: Apply the rule of law to the facts of the case
4th Par: Restate your conclusion
Example:
1st: YES/NO, (stand)
2nd: Laws/Cases - Basis
3rd: Application of facts
4th: Therefore, (conclusion)