This document provides guidance on reflection and evaluation of assessment activities. It recaps key factors for effective assessment such as feedback, learner involvement, and adjusting teaching. A 3-point evaluation rule is introduced involving assessing effectiveness, justifying ratings, and providing evidence. As an example, learners are asked to evaluate a prior SMART board assessment using descriptive, theory, and action-oriented reflection levels. The goal is to apply lessons to improve assessment knowledge and skills.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
95 views
Evaluation and Reflection
This document provides guidance on reflection and evaluation of assessment activities. It recaps key factors for effective assessment such as feedback, learner involvement, and adjusting teaching. A 3-point evaluation rule is introduced involving assessing effectiveness, justifying ratings, and providing evidence. As an example, learners are asked to evaluate a prior SMART board assessment using descriptive, theory, and action-oriented reflection levels. The goal is to apply lessons to improve assessment knowledge and skills.
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
Arrival activity
• What does ‘reflection’ mean to you?
• “Study without reflection is a waste of time;
reflection without study is dangerous” (Confucius) Aim: to evaluate and reflect upon assessment activities • To recap the key factors in effective assessment • To apply specific evaluation criteria to an assessment activity • To continue to develop own knowledge of assessment using ILT Recap: Key factors to effective assessment
• The provision of effective feedback
• Active involvement of learners in their own learning • Adjusting teaching to take account of the results of assessment • A recognition of the influence that assessment has on the motivation and self-esteem of learners • The need for self-assessment 3 Point Rule of Evaluation • How effective is it – “Highly effective, effective, ineffective" • Justify it – "Why is it highly effective?" • Elaborate – "How do I know that? What is the evidence?" SMART board example • Learning theory • In pairs, identify some specific criteria to assess last week’s learning theory SMART board assessment activity Descriptive level of reflection • What … • …was my role in the situation? …was I trying to achieve? …actions did I take? …was the response of others? …were the consequences …was good/bad about the experience? Theory level of reflection • So what … • …does this tell me/teach me …did I base my actions on? …other knowledge could I bring to the situation? …could/should I have done to make it better? …is my new understanding of the situation? …broader issues arise from the situation? Action-orientated level of reflection • Now what … • …could I do in order to make things better? … broader issues need to be considered if this action is to be successful? …might be the consequences of this action? Putting all together • In groups, use the earlier criteria to evaluate the SMART board activity in terms of: – What? (descriptive level) – So what? (theory level) – Now what? (action-orientated) • Up-date your ICT skills audit and your ILP