Derisory, Derisive, Abusive, Nauseous: The Words To Be Used
This document discusses the proper usage of certain words, particularly adjectives that describe human attitudes versus the objects of those attitudes. It gives examples of words like "pathetical", "derisory", "derisive", "abusive", and "nauseous" that are often misused to modify objects rather than attitudes. The document laments that some new dictionaries seem to sanction these misuses even though they contradict longstanding linguistic traditions and can change the meaning.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views
Derisory, Derisive, Abusive, Nauseous: The Words To Be Used
This document discusses the proper usage of certain words, particularly adjectives that describe human attitudes versus the objects of those attitudes. It gives examples of words like "pathetical", "derisory", "derisive", "abusive", and "nauseous" that are often misused to modify objects rather than attitudes. The document laments that some new dictionaries seem to sanction these misuses even though they contradict longstanding linguistic traditions and can change the meaning.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
The Words to be Used
Like the w ord pathetical in Shakespeare, it was applied to persons or
things w hich evoked or expressed genuine sympathy. In his Life of Samuel Johnson Boswell quotes a poetic tribute paid by Johnson on the death o f his old friend, Robert Levett. Boswell declares that Johnson had such an affectionate regard for Levett that he honoured his m em ory w ith the following pathetic verses. Thus at that time one m ight have praised an actresss sympathetic and moving performance in a tragedy by declaring it pathetic. If that were said today, it w ould be m ore likely to mean that the acting was pitiably bad. derisory, derisive, abusive, nauseous Sad to say, there are cases o f misuse o f words w hich we find sanctioned by new dictionaries. W here there are adjectives w hich define hum an attitudes we generally distinguish between the attitude and the object at w hich it is directed. That is to say, a m an may be described as being desirous of something and the object o f his desire as desirable. Similarly a person may be described as contem ptuous and, if the object o f the contem pt merits the attitude, we say it is contem ptible. If I developed a bad habit of mixing up these two w ords and describing a thing as contem ptuous w hen I m eant that it was contem ptible, the pedants w ould rightly be unwilling to give me their support. But in fact that is exactly w hat has happened in connection w ith the verb to deride. By all reasonable linguistic tradition, a person w ho derides is being derisory or derisive and the object o f the derision is derisible. My Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (1933 edition, reprinted w ith corrections 1947) presents all this clearly. Yet I find a new dictionary accepting the assumption that w hat is to be derided is derisory. Adjectives such as derisive and decisive are descriptive in the first place o f hum an attitudes. So is the adjective abusive. An abusive speech is a speech full o f abuse. Yet a speaker on BBC Radio 4, reporting on child-abuse, declared that people have been making their abusive claims for years. Clearly a claim that there has been abuse cannot be called an abusive claim, any m ore than a protest against indecency could be called an indecent protest. A w ord misused in the same way as derisory is the w ord nauseous. W hat is nauseous is nauseating. It causes nausea; it is repulsive and distasteful. Indeed the w ord has the connotative strength o f loathsom e. Yet journalists regularly misuse the word.