PC235W13 Assignment4 Solutions
PC235W13 Assignment4 Solutions
Classical Mechanics
Assignment #4 Solutions
#1 (10 points) JRT Prob. 4.28
Consider a mass m on the end of a spring of force constant k and constrained
to move along the horizontal x axis. If we place the origin at the springs equilibrium
position, the potential energy is 21 kx2 . At time t = 0 the mass is sitting at the
origin and is given a sudden kick to the right so that it moves out to a maximum
displacement xmax = A and then continues to oscillate about the origin.
(a) Write down the equation for conservation of energy and solve it to give the
masss velocity x in terms of the position x and the total energy E.
(b) Show that E = 21 kA2 , and use this to eliminate E from your expression for x.
Find the time for the mass to move from the origin out to a position x.
(c) Solve the result of part (b) to give x as a functionp
of t and show that the mass
executes simple harmonic motion with period 2 m/k.
Solution
2/m
E 12 kx2 .
A2 x 2 ,
2
p
where = k/m. From the hint given in the problem statement, we find
Z x
Z
1 x
dx
dx
.
(1)
=
t=
)
0
A2 x2
0 x(x
The integral can be evaluated with the substitution x = A sin , and gives
sin1 (x/A). Thus, t = (1/) sin1 (x/A).
(a) Write down the gravitational potential energy when the toy is tipped to an
angle from the vertical.
(b) For what values of R and h is the equilibrium at = 0 stable?
Solution
(a) As the toy tips, the hemisphere rolls but its center O remains at a fixed height.
However, the height of the CM above O changes from h R to (h R) cos .
Therefore, the PE of the toy is now U () = mg [R + (h R) cos ].
(b) Since dU/d = mg(h R) sin , which vanishes at = 0, we see that the
upright position is an equilibrium, which was probably easy to guess. Next,
d2 U/d2 = mg(h R) cos = mg(R h) at = 0. This tells us that the
equilibrium is only stable if R > h.
=
(M m cos ) + const. (2)
U = mgh M gH = gb
sin tan
sin
(b) Equilibrium points exist wherever dU/d = 0. This derivative is (using the
product rule)
dU
gb(m M cos )
m sin2 cos (M m cos )
=
.
= gb
2
d
sin
sin2
(3)
If M < m, dU/d can never equal zero. Therefore, there are no equilibrium
points for M < m.
2
(a) We will choose the zero-level of PE where = 0. As the wheel turns through
angle , the mass m descends by R (the length of the arc of radius R and
angle .) At the same time, the mass M rises by R(1 cos ); this can be
seen on the figure - draw a horizontal line from the position of M at angle
to intersect the vertical line indicating = 0...the length of the line between
this intersect and the center of the wheel is R cos . The distance between the
bottom of the wheel and the center of the wheel is R. Thus, the height gained
by M while turning through angle is R(1 cos ). Therefore the total PE
is
U () = M gR(1 cos ) mgR.
(4)
(b) The condition for equilibrium is that dU/d = 0. In this case, we require that
M gR sin = mgR, or sin = m/M . Because m and M are real, there are
no positions of equilibrium if m > M . If m < M , there are two points of
equilibrium; the two solutions of = sin1 (m/M ) over a full rotation of 2.
These solutions are symmetrically positioned with respect to = /2 - that
is, symmetric with respect to a horizontal line that passes through the axle.
The equation M gR sin = mgR expresses the fact that the clockwise torque
about the axle due to M is balanced by the counterclockwise torque about the
axle due to m. They only balance at the equilibrium points.
The stability of the equilibrium points depends on the second derivative,
d2 U/d2 = M gR cos . This is positive (stable) for the equilibrium point
with < /2, but negative (unstable) for the equilibrium point with > /2.
This can also be explained in terms of torques. For the equilibrium point with
< /2, an increase in pushes M out farther away (horizontally) from the
axle, thus increasing the torque due to M , which returns M to its equilibrium.
For the equilibrium point with > /2, an increase in brings M closer (horizontally) to the axle, reducing the torque, which causes M to move away from
its equilibrium (from the figure, it is easy to see that the torque due to m does
not depend on ).
4
Fig. 3:
geometry of problem #6
p
k/m = 20 rad/s, f = /2 = 3.2 Hz, and = 1/f = 0.31 s.
#8 (10 points)
A tennis ball with a small mass m2 sits on top of a basketball with a large
mass m1 , as in the figure below. The bottom of the basketball is a height h above
the ground, and the bottom of the tennis ball is a height h + d above the ground
(that is, the diameter of the basketball is d. The balls are dropped from this configuration. To what height does the tennis ball bounce?
Hint: Use the results of Problem 4.47 (which you dont need to prove). Work in the
approximation where m1 is much larger than m2 , and assume that the balls bounce
elastically - in this case, the answer doesnt depend on the masses. Also assume, to
aid in visualizing the moment of impact, that the balls are initially separated by a
very small but finite distance and that they bounce instantaneously. If youve never
seen this experiment carried out before, then the answer might surprise you. Try it
at home, just make sure that the two balls are vastly different in mass, that they
both bounce well, and that you dont do it under an expensive chandelier.
Solution
Right before the basketball hits the ground, both balls are moving downward with
6
2gh.
(7)
Immediately after the basketball hits the ground, it moves upward with speed v
(required since this is an elastic collision), while the tennis ball moves downward
with speed v (remember, they are separated by a very small but finite distance.)
The relative speed (in the frame of the basketball) is therefore 2v (downward.) From
Problem 4.47, this means that after the basketball and tennis ball collide, the tennis
ball will have a velocity of 2v upward relative to the basketball. Since the upward
speed of the basketball is essentially still v (because it is so much more massive
than the tennis ball,) the tennis ball must have an upward speed 3v following the
collision. By conservation of energy, it then rises to a height of H = d + (3v)2 /2g.
But v 2 = 2gh, which means the height is
H = d + 9h.
(8)
(e) If the mass is placed at x = 4 and released from rest, what is the turning point
on the other side of x0 ?
Note: The proper units are implied in F (x)...that is, the factor of 4 has units of
Nm2 and the factor of 1 has units of N.
Solution
(a) An equilibrium point is one for which dU/dx = 0, or, more relevantly to us,
where F = 0. Therefore, the point we seek is where x2 = 4, and since the
particle moves only along the positive x-axis, we can say that x0 = 2. We
know that this point is stable, since an increase in x results in a force directed
in the x direction and vice versa.
(b)
U (x) =
F (x)dx = x +
4
+ C,
x
(10)
4
4.
x
(11)
(c) We know that the zeroth- and first-order terms in the Taylor series will both
be zero (since x0 is both an equilibrium point and our reference point for U (x).
Therefore, we only need the second-order term:
1
8
1
1
2
(12)
(x 2)2 = (x 2)2 .
U (x) U (x = 2)(x 2) =
3
2
2 (2)
2
p
(d) From chapter 6, we know that = pk/m. From part (d), we see that k = 1
for this potential, and therefore = 1/m.
(13)
(14)
(15)
Solution
When the mass is at position (x, y), the lengths of the two springs are 1 and 2 .
With regards to the figure below, we see that 1 can be approximated as
1/2
p
2x x2 + y 2
2
2
1 =
(a + x) + y = a 1 +
(16)
+
a
a
"
2 #
1 2x x2 + y 2
1 2x
a 1+
+
2 a
a2
8 a
= a+x+
y2
2a
(a second-degree binomial expansion was used for that second step...we only used
half of the 2nd-order term, since the other half involves fourth-order terms). The
potential energy of spring 1 is therefore
2
1
1
y2
2
U1 =
(17)
k(1 0 ) = k (a 0 ) + x +
2
2
2a
1
k (a 0 )2 + 2(a 0 )x + x2 + (1 0 /a)y 2
[U = 0]
[dU/d = 0] .
(19)
(20)
m=0.7M
m=0.8M
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
[units of ]
0.5
[units of ]
Dividing one of these by the other, we can eliminate both M and m, leaving
an equation for the required angle:
1 cos = sin .
(21)
This equation cant be solved analytically. Numerical root solvers can be used,
or you can simply plot the left- and right-hand sides vs. and see where they
cross. This occurs at 2.33 rad. From the 2nd of the coupled equations,
we know that m = M sin = 0.725M . If you plot U () in this case as in part
(c), you will find that it does indeed represent the critical value that we desire.
2gh. We will inductively determine the speed of each ball after it bounces off the
one below it; that is, we wish to ask: if Bi achieves a speed of vi after bouncing off
Bi1 , then what is the speed of Bi+1 after it bounces off B?
The relative speed of Bi+1 and Bi right before they collide is v + vi . This is
11
also the relative speed after they bounce. Therefore, since B1 is still moving upward
at essentially speed vi (since it is much more massive than Bi+1 ,) we see that the
final upward speed of Bi+1 equals (v + vi ) + vi = 2vi + v.
Now, regarding the bottom ball B1 , we knows that v1 = v, from which we
can recursively calculate v2 = 3v (which agrees with the results from part (a)),
v3 = 7v, v4 = 15v, etc. In general,
vn = (2n 1)v.
(22)
[(2n 1) v]2
= + (2n 1)2 h
2g
(23)
(24)
Assuming that the stack of balls is dropped from a much lower height than the
desired final height, we can ignore the term . For H=1 km, five balls falls just
short (961 m); six is required, but its a bit of overkill
(3969 m).
Escape velocity is reached when vn vesc = 2gR, where R = 6.4 106 m
is the radius of the earth. Since vn = (2n 1) 2gh, we have
!
r
R
+1 ,
(25)
n log2
h
which means we need n 12. Of course, the forces experienced by the smaller balls
at the top of the pile would be so great in this case that the assumption of elastic
collisions is fairly absurd. Also, its nearly impossible to stack a large number of
balls in a perfectly vertical orientation.
12