Biology Coursework
Biology Coursework
RESEARCH
Definition of Osmosis:
If a substance is dissolved in
water, the kinetic energy of the
water molecules is LOWERED.
This is because some water
molecules collect on the surface
of the other molecules…
The cell is
turgid.
This is in the
For units of For
Water potential of cytoplasm=
example: osmotic Water potential of cytoplasm=
example:
- 50 pressure - 50
Osmotic potential of solution= Osmotic potential of solution=
- 20 - 80
When a solution is hypertonic, it contains a low concentration of solute (in
this case sucrose) and a high amount of water. In this situation, water is
caused to diffuse out of the cell- this process is known as exosmosis. This
makes a few changes to the shape of the cell, such as it shrivels and wilts.
It becomes flaccid, in which the cell would feel soft, limp and weak. If a lot
of water leaves the cell, the cytoplasm starts to peel away from the cell
wall (but the cell wall still keeps intact). This is where the cell has
undergone plasmolysis.
In an isotonic
For Example: solution, no net
Water potential of cytoplasm= osmosis occurs.
- 50 The cell is not
Osmotic potential of solution= plasmolysed, but
- 50 it’s neither full
(This is the osmotic pressure) turgid either.
HYPOTHESIS
Apparatus/Equipments:
Variables (Dependant):
♦ Percentage change in mass
I will record my results in a table, and then represent them on a graph for
visual evidence; this will allow me to distinguish any patterns of such.
The range of concentration I am going to test is from pure water with the
concentration of zero molars, to one molar- complete sucrose solution,
testing each one: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and finally 1
molar. I will use the measuring cylinders to dilute the sucrose solution
according to the amount needed to make that particular concentration.
(E.g. I will dilute 0.6M with distil water to make a sucrose solution of 0.4).
To get an idea of what the experiment is like at first hand I did some
preliminary work. This way I can find what apparatus we would be using,
be more efficient in the real experiment and finally to help us make a
decision such as how long to leave the cell potatoes in the solution and
the size of potato cell. We can be more prepared in the real experiment
we would be more prepared, more in control, and to see if we wanted to
change anything, such as perhaps use a different range of concentration
and maybe better equipment that make the results more accurate.
Even before the preliminary, I prepared a table to record the results and of
what I will be measuring:
During the preliminary, my partner collected the ten test tubes (as we
were testing ten different concentrations), along with a test tube rack. One
of us filled each test tube with the correct amount of distilled water, while
the other one did the amount of sucrose. Once that was sorted, grabbing
one potato, we first made the mistake of cutting the potato in half and
slicing it into cubes. We did not realise later on that we were supposed to
use a special tool (NAME) that would cut out cylinder tube-like pieces of
potato. So using another potato, we skinned the skin (since the skin is like
a barrier and so getting rid of it would allow the process of osmosis to
occur more efficiently) and placing them in chronologic order on a tile, we
weighed each one.
We did not do any repeats (because we forgot); we found that our results
came out to what we didn’t quite expect. I expected it to be having gained
mass for the first five concentrations. In fact, according to my research, I
had expected that at concentration 0.5, there would not have been any
mass gained or lost (but I believe I’m expecting too much from this
experiment to receive exactly 0.00 g not gained or lost). After
concentration 0.5, I would think it would start losing mass- from our
results, I can see that this much has at least happened.
IN REAL EXPERIMENT:
Method
We recorded the results in a tale as shown below, and then drawn a graph
to show visual evidence and to see if there is a pattern or trend between
the results.
From the table, I have repeated the experiment and have taken the
average of the two sets of results; this has helped me produce more
accurate results than if I were to do the investigation only once.
I used pipettes/syringes to make accurate measurements when pouring
the sucrose solution and diluting it with distilled water.
OBSERVATIONS
I realised that as I went down to the test tubes that held the higher
concentrated sucrose solution, when I came to weigh the potato cell, it felt
soft, mushy, weak, and limp. I could easily tear it in half or squash it. On
the other hand, when I was weighing the potato cells in the less
ANALYSIS
My results show that during the process of osmosis within the time of two
hours and thirty-five minutes, (12.30pm - 3.05pm) the mass of the potato
cells have changed. The results indicate that as the concentration of
sucrose increases, the percentage of mass change becomes more
negative. The results also tells me that as the concentration of sucrose
decreases, and the amount of dilute water increases, the percentage mass
change becomes a more of a positive value.
It also appears that after the concentration of 0.5M (including itself), the %
mass change is always a negative value afterwards.
Take the ‘Mass After’ from the ‘Mass Before’ to get the mass change. Then
divide ‘Mass Change’ by ‘Mass Before’ and then multiply it by hundred to
get the mass change percentage. You do this with second set of result.
You then add both ‘% Change in Mass’ and divide by two to work out the
‘Average %’ in change in mass.
The pattern seen in the graph is that the higher the sucrose concentration,
the more mass is lost; and the higher the concentration of dilute water,
the more mass is gained. You can see this trend/pattern, as I have drawn a
line of best fit, which goes from top left to bottom right, meaning there is a
negative correlation.
Plasmolysis:
EVALUATION
♦ I did in fact use two different potatoes, where both of them could have
grown in a different environment and contain different nutrients and
minerals, including different water amounts inside them
♦ The size of the cell: May not have been very accurate, because firstly
the potato was round, and was not cut into a perfect cube – this was
partly because it would be too small by the time it was cut down to a
cube (and there wouldn’t have been enough space to cut out potato
cells)
♦ The borer sometimes did not cut properly, it left out slight gaps in the
corners
♦ Despite using pipettes, the measurements of the two solutions may
have been inaccurate due to human error
♦ The weighing machine may have had a few faulty measures
♦ Drying the potato cell may not have been done properly
I think my results are reliable to a certain extent; because as you see from
my table, I believe that my first and second sets of results are moderately
close and therefore producing accurate average % mass change results.
This produces better evidence and proof that will support my conclusion.
Four of my points go through the line of best fit
FURTHER WORK
For the graph, you would plot the concentration on the x-axis against the
length of the potato cell that would be on the y-axis. You could draw
another line graph to show the width (as you may not be able to hare the
same scale with the length of the potato cell)