325 Final Design Lab Report
325 Final Design Lab Report
Pre-lab
Title Page
Intro /Theory / Procedure
Summary
Experimental Results /
Analysis / Discussion
Problems Encountered
Conclusion
Questions
Total
Grade Assigned
20%
5%
10%
40%
5%
5%
15%
100%
Student's Grade
Objective:
The purpose of this lab was to explore the properties of MOSFET amplifier circuits, and to use
all the knowledge we learned from previous labs to design a CMOS amplifier that meets certain
specifications.
The requirements for this project are listed below:
1. Voltage Gain ( A v 50 .
2. Input Impedance ( R 200k.
3. 3 dB Bandwidth > 200kHz.
4. Harmonic distortion below -30dB with Vimax = 5mVpk (10mVpp) measured at 10kHz
input sinusoidal signal.
5. Vcc = no minimum required, but absolute max=5V.
6. Rload = 8.
7. Use a minimum of 3 MOSFETs in design.
Introduction/Theory:
For this design, three common-source CMOS configuration circuits were set up in series. Every
common-source CMOS stage provides a particular voltage gain depending on different designs.
The desired final voltage gain can be obtained by coupling these stages together. A commondrain CMOS configuration circuit, which can serve as a buffer, is coupled in series with the
output of the third common-source CMOS stage. An ideal common-drain CMOS circuit has
unity voltage gain and can transfer the voltage from the common sources having a high output
impedance to a low impedance level on the output.
Figure 1: Common-Source
Configuration
Figure 2: Common-Drain
Configuration
When designing the components of circuit configurations shown above, some important
relationships and equations are used to determine components values. The equations and
relationships used are listed below:
R2
)
R1 + R2
1.
V G=V DD (
2.
1
I D = (V GS V TH )2
2
3.
A V =RD g m
4.
V GS=V G V S
5.
gm=
6.
V s=I D R S
7.
V GS = gm =>
8.
R D =>
2 ID
= 2 I D= (V GS V TH )
( V GSV TH )
AV
I D =>
gm =>
AV
= 1 or
AV =
R D R L
RS
depending on the
Procedure:
The first step of our design was to set up a common source amplifier configuration to achieve a
gain again with a high input impedance. The first amplifier was tested by itself to get a proper
gain and bias points. The values for the common source can be found in Table 1. Following this,
another common source was constructed with the same values, tested, and coupled to the original
amplifier to achieve an even higher gain. A third common source was added to achieve a gain
that met the specification of above fifty. All three amplifiers were coupled together with large
capacitors. Lastly, in order to bring the output impedance from the amplifier down to the small 8
load, a BJT darlington pair configuration was used. This was so that the right amount of high
current could be used on the small load. The following is how each different configuration was
calculated:
1. First, the power supply chosen was 4 Volts so that we can optimize a high gain of
approximately 4 with each stage and obtain a gain of above (and near to in order
to account for distortion) 50 V/V. If a gain of 4 was achieved for each common
Gain achieved reached was about 38.5 after all three common sources and the common drain.
There was a fairly large amount of distortion at the end of the buffer. This is because of the large
current being supplied to the signal in the darlington pair because when the signal was tested
through only the common sources, there was almost no distortion.
R1
Parameter
Value
500 K
R2
400 K
RD
45 K
Rs
100
VG
Capacitors
100 uF
1.778 V
ID
42.72 uA
Transistors
CD4007
R1
Parameter
Value
500 K
R2
400 K
First Stage R D
14.68 K
First Stage R s
100
Second Stage R D
10 K
Second Stage R S
100
Third Stage R D
22 K
Third Stage R S
100
Capacitors
Transistors
10 uF
CD4007
42.72 uA
Gain
R1
Value
200 K
R2
600 K
Rs
10
Capacitors
Transistors
10 uF
Q2N2222
Parameter
R1
Value
60 K
R2
600 K
Rs
10
Capacitors
Transistors
100 uF
Q2N2222
Problems Encountered:
The one major problem that we encountered was setting the operating point of the amplifiers.
When we would set up the circuits, we would use the values provided to us or solved for in the
pre-lab. However, these values needed to be adjusted in order to achieve the operating point and
the correct characteristics. Any trouble that we had when our amplifiers werent working
properly was because the operating point was not set correctly. Other than that, we experienced
problems using the equipment in the lab from just about any station that we worked on. It was
very difficult to get a 5 mVpk on the function generators and when achieved, the oscilloscopes
hard trouble reading the signal. This caused a lot of unnecessary time waste.
Conclusion:
This lab helped us to understand the characteristics of the MOS transistor configurations. We
learned how important biasing the correct operating point is in determining the output behavior.
We also learned a lot about the engineering design process from the beginning until the end. The
beginning being brainstorming the types of configurations we could add together to achieve
some of the parameters. The middle being testing and refining the design so that it could properly
meet all requirements. The end being summarizing all our efforts on the design so that we can
expand on our knowledge of transistor technologies. Amplifier designs are a very important
aspect in signal processing in electrical engineering and this project has been a great introduction
to becoming design engineers capable of learning how to follow guidelines while optimizing the
product.