0% found this document useful (0 votes)
225 views

Gradient Impedance (Gi), and Extended Elastic Impedance (Eei) Methods To Characterize

Extended elastic impedance (EEI) and gradient impedance (GI) methods were able to clearly identify channel sands in a Paleocene reservoir, while acoustic impedance (AI) alone could not. Synthetic modeling showed EEI at 60 degrees of projection was optimal for lithology separation. Reflectivity modeling found channel sands were only visible in far-offset synthetic gathers at 30 degrees. Picking AVO anomalies on the Paleocene reservoir identified class IIp sands at the top. EEI was also applied as a continuation of AVO analysis on angle gathers to further characterize the reservoir.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
225 views

Gradient Impedance (Gi), and Extended Elastic Impedance (Eei) Methods To Characterize

Extended elastic impedance (EEI) and gradient impedance (GI) methods were able to clearly identify channel sands in a Paleocene reservoir, while acoustic impedance (AI) alone could not. Synthetic modeling showed EEI at 60 degrees of projection was optimal for lithology separation. Reflectivity modeling found channel sands were only visible in far-offset synthetic gathers at 30 degrees. Picking AVO anomalies on the Paleocene reservoir identified class IIp sands at the top. EEI was also applied as a continuation of AVO analysis on angle gathers to further characterize the reservoir.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ABSTRACT

SEISMIC ANALYSIS USING ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE (AI),


GRADIENT IMPEDANCE (GI), AND EXTENDED ELASTIC
IMPEDANCE (EEI) METHODS TO CHARACTERIZE
PALEOCENE SAND RESERVOIR IN SASA FIELD, PAPUA
By
Annisa Mutiara Badri

AVO (Amplitude Versus Offset) analysis method that works on the reflectivity
domain can be used to identify and analyze the presence of hydrocarbon
anomalies generally. But in certain cases is required deeper analysis to detect
hydrocarbon. For example, extended elastic impedance (EEI) has been found to
be discriminator effective in lithology and fluid separation. In this research, I
performed synthetic modelling in Paleocene reservoir, that is impedance model
and reflectivity model. From impedance model, it can be seen that acoustic
impedance (AI) model could not show the existence channel sand in this research.
However, on the model of gradient impedance (GI) and extended elastic
impedance (EEI) can be seen clearly the channel sand on the Paleocene reservoir.
The optimum projection for lithology separation to see existence of channel sand
occured in EEI 60 o. While the model reflectivity which is created using equation
Aki-Richard term 2, found that the zero offset and full stack can not showing
channel sand, but in the far synthetic model (angle 30o), channel sand is beginning
to be seen. The application of pick AVO Paleocene reservoir, get anomaly class of
sandstones is class IIp on top A-2. In this research is also applied extended elastic
impedance (EEI) method as continuation of AVO method that is applied to angle
gather IL1728. EEI section in this research is obtained from trace math between
AI and GI. While acoustic impedance and gradient impedance in this research was
obtained through a method of coloured inversion which is applied to intercept and
gradient.
keyword : AVO, AI, GI, EEI, Channel sand

You might also like