Scribd
Upload
79 views

ACT107

The document provides summative and formative assessment feedback for a student in their first year BA (Hons) Design for Interaction programme. It evaluates the student's performance on 3 learning outcomes relating to reviewing their strengths/weaknesses as a learner, setting personal and professional goals, and presenting evidence of learning. The feedback includes grades for each assessment criteria, an overall comment, and the student's final grade for the project.

Uploaded by

lisaconnolly
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
79 views

ACT107

The document provides summative and formative assessment feedback for a student in their first year BA (Hons) Design for Interaction programme. It evaluates the student's performance on 3 learning outcomes relating to reviewing their strengths/weaknesses as a learner, setting personal and professional goals, and presenting evidence of learning. The feedback includes grades for each assessment criteria, an overall comment, and the student's final grade for the project.

Uploaded by

lisaconnolly
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Assessment Feedback

Summative Formative

Student Name Student ID

Programme BA (Hons) Design for Interaction Level 1


Project Title Project Value
Unit Title Personal and Professional Development 1 Unit Code PPD1/ACT107
Project Leader Unit Leader

Assessment Criteria Indicative Grading


Excellent V Good Good Satisfactory Basic Fail N/A
1 Thoroughly review their own strengths and weaknesses
(particularly as a learner) and relate these to relevant
models, such as learning styles; (LO1)
2 Develop and set out personal and professional goals,
particularly in relation to learning, that are informed by the
models covered within the unit; (LO2)
3 Evidence their learning and personal and professional
development by gathering relevant material and presenting
this in an appropriate form. (LO3)
Note 1 - Unless specified in the Project Brief it is assumed that all assessment criteria are equally weighted

Overall comment including strengths and areas for improvement

Grade Banding Brief Grade Descriptor


A+ 90-100 High Excellent all round work or outstanding
A 80-89 Medium performance Grade (where appropriate)
A- 70-79 Low
B+ 67-69 High High level achievement or very good level of
B 64-66 Medium performance
B- 60-63 Low
C+ 57-59 High Good level of achievement or proficient
C 54-56 Medium performance
C- 50-53 Low
D+ 47-49 High Satisfactory level of achievement or competent
D 44-46 Medium performance
D- 40-43 Low
E 35-39 Marginal Elementary achievement or basic level of Note 2 - All summative grades are subject to ratification by the Examination Board
Pass performance
F+ 30-34 Marginal Does not achieve the learning outcomes but
Fail may be some element of understanding or Please contact your Unit Leader about retrieval
competence arrangements (where appropriate)
Assessor(s)
F < 30 Name:
Fail No evidence of achievement or competence
F- > 10 Poor Fail
0 0 no submission or special circumstances

Student signature: Date sent to student:

You might also like