Scribd
Upload
537 views

Api 580

API 580

Uploaded by

Vinoth Kannan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
537 views

Api 580

API 580

Uploaded by

Vinoth Kannan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18
» 2 » » > » ‘A physic condition ora eese fs ha ardous material bt could su fom somponent flr an rest in human injury or death, ln or date, envio: menal dese acrd 3. tose © Pattre “mitation of any negative conse- quence or eduton in prebailty fa paca vent, BD stigstion Bo Reducton Resid “Methods tht use enginecting Judgent and experience sth bse forthe anlsis of babies and conseuenet of lure. AD” Qualtatve isk asesment 3B Relaive rk © Nominal ‘An analysis ht erties and dtinetes the combinations ofevens, eines te feueney of occurrence fr each combination and estimates te consecces A) Quuatiaive rakemisi BOuatatverskarayns ©. Process sar eas es tga models depicting combination of ents BD Quoniaive rik anys 3. Qursverakamis €. Prcesrhasedanlyis ‘Quantitative risk ans logi model generally consist snd A) Bventresane fut tres BL Product reesandioss es ©. Likhood nee and consequen wes eines ning events and combinstions of sytem successes ad ales AD venttees = 8 Fauttoees © Logie tees ‘epee ways in hich the system flues represented inthe event ees can occur Event ees 5) Faultwces © Logle res ‘he comparative risk of facility, process uit, system, quips tenor component io oker facies R) Relative risk. Bo Abwolute rik Soma 10) Combination ofthe robablty ofan vent and its consequence. ap ki Balle - © Loss D. Redton 1) Systematic use of infomation to denity sources and estimate the sk, A Risk B Risk amas . © Hand aalais 12) von snnP- ides bai fr isk evaluation rst migaton and isk acceptance, A Risk BD Riskanaysis © Hamed alysis '3) Process used assign values tothe probly and eorsequnce ofa risk. \ Riskevaluation| 3) Ritkestimaton : Risk idestieaton 4) Process wed compare the etc matd rk apt given isk eta dtemine he signif- came ofthe rik 1) Riskevalstion B. Risk eination © Risk Meseton 15) Proceso find, st and charset element of ik. A. Riskestmaton B.Riskevaustion Risk idesifeton 46) Coordinate ative to dre and contol organization with regard tisk, A Riskmanagement . 3. Riskevatuton, Rik contol 17) Thing or atv with a potenti fo on sequence. 2D source Baca - © Toe » ina safety cones azar Pal ‘AD Source / 3. Towle 19) The isk prior to gon setvites y Unmiigate rik Keown ri Milter 2» ‘isthe combination ofthe probability of ome event occuring daring tne period of ‘mere nd the consequences, aesacated with the even. B rise 3 Low CMe rik 21) Actof mitigating aknown risk a omer level ofr BR Ridertecsion Bo Risk mitigation CRiskevaiaton 22) A proces tases rss, to determin If rection segue and to develop plan to ‘mint risks at an acepabe lve, A? Risk management B Riskmitietion © Riskcontot 23) When some rk iene as ccepable then on of te followings ot equi A) Riskreduton BR Riskevaluation © Risk mitigation DB. Riskcontal 24) In process plans, ar esalshed to detect and evs detention due ton ser vie operation inspection nd esting prograns ©. Preventive manent proprans . service lapeton progres 25) Wier an equipment es lw deterioration rates as an inapectr what you dai nie of internal onsen nspecton 3. Owofsence pectin © Ema pect 2» ‘presets the next generation of inspection spprsches and tral etn ‘ecogizing tat the line gol of inspection the sfety and eablyof ope ates RR Phe © Hap DB Rem 27) Fora ypc inspection program, i excessive inspection applied te, (FB) Levetotrisk may 29 up Bo Levelot sk may pp down © Levelaf i rel etme 28) ~~~ proves consistent methodology fer asesingthe optimum combination of methods 3d equencies cm cme ay 28) Troveh inspection activites are focused cn higher rik tems and away fom ower tems ® Roi Boh Rem D. Hanop 30) Following re notte residual risk fctors for fos of conient A Human ero 8 Nawal dises /- & Fandaertal ita of pectin met (D) Toe ld containment 31) Rb focused ona sys tematic determination of ®) Relative risks Bl Atwolue rts c Campa ts 5. Tonle 2) Actofatgnng awn to wer eo ik a5 atten 2 Ritceptte © Rateupae 38) Some ites have potently serious conse- quences, bu the probability of the inet sow, then (Tye rae may ot want immediate ston B.Therskmay waren immediate action © The sk may waran appropriate mitigation ator +3) Hite prob: ability nd consequence combination (sk) i hgh enough tobe unacceptable then ! A migatin scion to predict o prevent the event recommended 8. A mitigation ction to eect or prevent the event isnt rcommended © Waranttoansiyse ris involved 39) senna preset te mao that has ested oe pon a ak asi cigs tary eee pes ote GE) uv si seronet(n) SE Quite sa eossnen © Sutter met 36) A analysis shares many ofthe techniques and data requirement with & Qe 3B Ph © Haxp Dente 3) Tara has ben prepared fora process ui he... analy an borow etsy fom thiseffor. RD Revconsequene B Rbvlinoed © Rbi probably 38) Hazard dentitcaton ina anayss generally focus om ideniiabe fre mech anise the equipment Gspecabl causes) but does ot explily del with Other potest tre scenarios esting fom events sich x power kilres or human 3 Other pote ire esting om event such as arable ire do leak fom ‘xuipment ©. Evroamentl input cased de ttn lee % els with total ik than with sk involve only wits the euipment Boge 3 RM cP DO OFe 40) Risk presented inquratiave risk aralyis Precise numeric value 3. Foonafriskmatrix © Formafevent ie and faut ree 41) Ris presented inqualiative isk analysis as Precise numeri value E)— Formofrsemauix F Formofevent ue and fal ree 2) Results rom gnatiative analyse loge models are validated by ‘A> Expertjudgment BB. Inspecuonenginser C Meimenance sie . Operation pasone! 49) The sulablty an cuent contin ofthe equipment within he current operating envelope will eee the 0 the equipment fom one or more dtesoaton mechan, A. Probbiiy of ale (po) B Consequence of flute Teale Di Relative rk ‘4 The probity of uilure, when cou pled with he associated consequence of failure (cf) (Geesection 1D wll dateine sociated with the psipment fe, AL Operating Bl Ranking Csi 4) Isa ssk mangement activity that may lead trek reduction, A Ipection 3 Evaluator © Analyse +46) The primary produto 7b efor shoud be ‘A. Aninspecon plan for ech equipment tem evaluated BMiigationplan fr ech equipment tem evaluates © Rest rkasesest pln foreach equipment tm evated 47) Foltowing ae some ofthe recognised iss which amot be managed by inspection abe excep oot A. Equpmentoening retirement. BL ature mechanisms (och as brine factor, fatigue) where avoidance of fue Primarily pens on operating within defined pressushenpeatre emelon © Consequese dominated risks . The sabi and curent condtion ofthe equipment within th euren operating velope wil determine the probably of flr (poof te equpment fom one or ‘mor deteraton mechanisms. 4) Following are the ne nspecton mitigation actions except one ‘A. Replacement rupert 8! Egupmentedesign C._Mainenanes of tet contro on operating conditions 1D, —_Riskmanagemen by monitoring He dteontion 49) inthe eve of eaktbe portal hie of an elton valve could A. caene te ventory B. Decree th nvertny © None wwe 50) Potealhazns denied in apa will fen affect the ‘A. Probability of aur sd ofthe rik eution 1B. Consequec ffs seo the equation 51) Rbi may ncle methodologies tases the efetveness ofthe management systems in rmaiaiing A. Meets neg, Bl Tolasetinepsty Plane egry 52) Eauipment relly is especially importa if eaks can be cated by ‘A Secondary fl tre, such soe of ules | Primary falures such a leak et severe corosion (© Tertiary flutes det ave land packing leak 53) Reliability efor, sch as reli ability centered mlntnance (rem, cn be linked with bi, resulting in an tegrated program 0 ‘AW Redace downtime inn operating unit B. _Reduce opertng ine of nt © Tovedsce risk by mitigation astivites ‘4) in jrsietons that permite application ofthe ap inpetion codes and stands ‘AW Rbishouk bean acceptable method for seting inspection pans. Rem shoul be an aceepable meth fr sting he inspection plans c Pha 8) to esblshed to judge accept of risk coud bean abectve of teri ‘sessment isch erteria dona ext already within the we's company. A. Riskerte fe Riscpan © Riskaalyas 6) Is usualy othe primary oje- ive of basement bt itis equely & Slide ofec of opinenton A. Reducing inspection costs Increasing iepedon cots (C._Incresngfequency of inspection programs 57) Wen the inspection program is optimized bate onan understanding of sk one or moe ofthe (low ing costedution tenes maybe reaied, Except one ‘A. Inefeetve, unnecessary or igpproprate intpeton actives maybe eliminated, B_Effctive, necessary o appropriate inspection atv ties may beeline © Ontine or man-invasiveinspetion metiods maybe sub ted fr ivsive methods that requis eqipmentsitdown ‘More effete infequet inspection may be substi for ls fective frequent inspections 58) Te following ae the risks ened by i assessment that may be man- aged by ston other shan nspecon Except one |A. Mediation ofthe proceso eliminate orton ving ther B.Modiiatin of operating procedures 1 voi situations driving he isk, (©. Chemizal weament ofthe proces fo reduce deteronton tessuscepiis. DL —_entfing and deztng deterioration and predting fue detiraton sta with ssdvanced inspoctin techies). 59) For quale ri analysis it is important extablsh a set af esto assure consseny in AL Cugoriznton or isifeation B. Segregation © Ranking 6) Generally, aquaiasive analysis sing broad anges requires a Som the user ‘hana quantitative approach ‘A. Higher evel ofjudgmen sil and understanding B. Lower level ofjuigemen, skilland understanding 61) The models revs. to provide both qualtaive and quanaive insights shout the level of risk ano defy he design, ste, or operational charters tha re he ‘nos imporant ork ‘A Probability 5 Sttisically Cites D.Logically 63) Potential sure of enor in i analysis regarding dats quality ae the followin excent Assumption in equpmet history (ust drawings nd documentation Inspector enor Advanced inspecton methade nee (64) The folowing assumption canbe made that significantly imps the acute coosion ate ‘ely inthe equipment ie ‘A. Ifthe baseline thickness were not performed the nomi thickness my be wad forthe cviginal heres B, original hiekness not rable, averaged ut thickness readings may be wed C. terial thickness so avilable maximum it thickness eadings may be wed co) ‘ay result inthe calcul corsion rate appearing aici high ot low, A. Clerical enor BL Measurement enor spect eror D.Utscaming (66) The dt validation step sesses th ned fora knowedgeable nviduat ‘A. To comparig data fom he inspections to the expected detention mechanism and ats, To compare the resls with previous measurements on th system, CC. Similar systems at the te or wih the company or published data D. Allofthe above 65) the amount and ype of codes and standards wed by 8 city en ave 1B, _Noimpect on i resus C.— Less sigaicar inact on rests (8) Who shoal be conse define he coupment eteron mechani, ceili and seta lure nee ‘Al Ametlgt or cameo pssst “8 ‘Ameri andcomasion psi & Aeuligstoniy (3) Samo lt ony arte primary ipa i the probability of fire evaluation, ‘A. ‘Thedeteiration mechanisms, tes and susceptibilities B.Lowofeonainment id (C.F tonity ands concentration D. Damage mechanisms an i severity 10) is key to per frmlog deterioration mechani dentition ‘A. Understanding equipment operation and he ntercton withthe chemical an mechanical 1. Understanding equpment operation and proves upsets CC. Undenanting equpment operation and fe safety protective measures 7) Who can provide sefl input (suchas the spectrum of proces conditions, injection plas ee) ‘oad materials sens inthe desflestion of deterioration mechs andres, AL Process pci B._ Plan option speciaiss Ase imepty expec DL Inspection engineers 172) Thinning causes he os of materi om A. Extemal rice only 8 etemal surfaces ony © Excel enteral ures 7) Sec ots when epimers exposed enviroments A. Condsiveto cen reking mechanisms ‘8! Unfvounble to cea crking mechenisns (C—Unbeetci cern ercking mechan 11) wna ofen necessary 0 esablih suscepti of equipment to stress cmolan crag ‘A. Literate expert pinion and experince B. Cracking mechanisms © Damage mechanisms D.—Fhidtoxiety and is constuents Dy curves ae refered for iba eter melanism for carbon an ow alse 3. Pheoneraton curves Samia curves feud corosion 76 liming are the crea vrais fr detriotion mechani excep A. Materia ofcosrostin B Proc operatng Ct and st down canons DB. Inslasoe 17) Following ae he common mechanic dtrioraon means excep A Faigue BStewlresp naga © Tenleoveend 18) Depending onthe ethology employed in qualitative scaly, the categories may be describe with word such at ‘AL High, medium or low ormay have numerical desipto, B. High medium or low only Numerical deep only 78) When inaccurate or insuffi failure ats exists on the cif equpment tm for quanave probably oalure anais then ‘A. General industry, company or manufacturer fur dt ed 1B. Proves hazard analyze data may De wed C. Prose and toxie concentration analysis may be wed '80) everson rates canbe expressed in tems of ‘A. Corrosion es fr thiningo suscep for mechanisms where dtrorion tis ‘known B. Corrosion ates fr shinning.on ly © Inmensorable goat, D. Diserste numba F.Susceptbie tes only '1) Damage mecharsms wher deterioration reser immeasurable or unknown are ‘Stes coesonercking yrogn inden cracking Triana Allof the above Both and {82) The ably tse the rt of deterioration precisely is affected by the following except By equipment conplexiy ‘Type oeteriorton mechanism, proces and metallurgical varieons Inascessibiliy fr inspection, imitations of inspection ad est methods Lack ofcoverge ofan area subject to deteiotion. None ofthe above PEOeP 3 mone 183) The ype of itr mode tat ily to occur due opting AL Small lesz ets B. Small ielesto pares © Cracks D. —Catastopicrprre 1H) The ype offillue mode that likely to ocur due ose AL Seal bles pte B Smale © Cracks Di Onlyripare '85) "The ype offre mode that kel o occu ue to mechanics and targa deteiration A. Small holes to pes B. Cracks ©. Caastopie rprres Do Leaks 16) The ype ofall mode ta ikl to occur due thinning ‘A. Laeger ess rupture Gaby pte Meulion D. Cracke 17 very aggresive aids cared over fom a crrosion resistant pat of system nto & lowstram ese thats made of carton sel, the res woul be ‘A. Rapid corrosin could result in fire in afew hours or days General carson over a pei of tne cadet nme ss (©. No deterioration wil ke place sine carbon tel is esistent agressive aid 88) LFmlipienspecton hve been performed, which inspection may bet reflect cure open, cenaions A. Mes recent inspection B Bae line inspection sirvey ©. Press condone DB. Coneion survey 159) Probably sid teri equ normally managed by A. Pint inspector nspectonengiers BManenance planing ogee © Prcaeaeypeoae BD. Bohaand® 50) Other fnetona fares are uly covered within A RW B Ren a Di Hp 91) Fotowing wil cover he factions flares except. AL Hew exchange ie fre B. Prater devise fare © Roaring ecupment ure 1D. Stat euipment ale deo proces enviroment 92) Qualitative consequence analysis ofl ean be etimated seperately foreach ni, sytem, ‘efulpment group or individual equipment tm ‘A. Onthe basis of expert knowlege and experience 3. Onthebasisofavalabe data © On fiebais of proces and environmental conions D. —Nolasisreqed ine tis qualitative 93) Ress of guntiaive consequence says re sly expressed A Numeric B._Ranges fom high ow © Fregeny Bo Ocean 98) inmost consequence evaluations, a key element in determining te magne ofthe Ao The volume offi released, 3 Ameunt of suri are exposed due to tx lease (©. —_Physieal sen mpaced by lense 95) Following isthe wit of esi of consequence that ae lem developed sang those cent ed for ebsersnet| A Ase are con Enveomentl mage say (oso he damage om terme tends to ecu in = por 96) tos range Large distance Noe ofthe ove 3 veee 17) Toxic rae in ba nly dese when hey fet Peoone Expat 98) The hi program for eaviormena eonsequences,yplely focuses ‘A. Onscute and immediate environmentalist, rather thn hronicrisks fom low-level emissions B, Onscat and immediate cvone sks than immediate environmental iss ©. _Non treat eovionmenta sks, 99) Te consequences of environmental damage ae best understod by cos Release Volume of uid ‘Toxic concenron posp 100) Msintenance impact wil general be measured in monetary tes a typically nls: Repairs an equipment replacement Method a leanip Safey systems ome » nls powerfl too tat being used by many companies, goverments nd regulatory autores ax one metho in determining risk oceepance Cont ene analyse Rsk analsie Covi consequence analysis is based cot eas peep 12) Using riskasessment the iepctons ar prise based on A Riskvthe Rakim Risk conseguence Dd. Rife 103) _ypcally involves reviewing someo al input variables to he sk ‘calculation o determine the overall infvene on he relat ak valu, Sensitivity alysis Rink wna Process aad anayis Salty risk aalgis poe & isan enporant prt ofthe data validation phase of risk ses Sensitivity aralysis Riskanalysis, Probebiify ansis Process hzad analysis 105)_The information gterng performed ater the sensivity ans should be outed on ‘developing ‘A, More cerainy forthe key input variables. 5. Lessee forthe key np varies G.—_Noceainy rte hey input variabies D. Nonwofti ahve 106) Too conservative sumptions made fr he vale or unavailing "snmayunnet or prose Olav Inflate the lated ik ales “May mse mapection planers, management and insurers (Can create a uk of cre rth wer and the ri ress Allof te abore 107) Once teri values are developed, one way of peeing ress oft kale ae by A. Risk atv orpot 3 Riskindenore © Riskmaling Di Rikocermce 108) when he consequence category is given igher weightage han the baby exegry then the "isk mai wl be A Symmetrical Bo Abymmetial © Logi, D,Nenwatthe above 109) Highest riskranking inthe isk mais toward the Upper it comer of te mai per ie comer afte mare ber ight comer of he max Lower le comer ofthe mtn 110), One thers plas have been completed then tek lator marixcan bused a ‘daring te pittzaion process A. Screening 3 Gaidetne ol CCacto ie 91 D.Ribeetermiatin tot amy pies intuece the plaamet of isk theholis A. Corporate sf and nani polis B.Mamneunce tapeion poliier C—_Enunerag design polices Di Noseofthe stove 112) A pres vessel whichis ertical be operatonsmbos design rss 1 a ans operating ‘rear nde oral anda vary fom 6 bro Oat Toe veel sia supe ait pease ‘vironment. ue course of eae the vessel pat no avi for year bj icing ‘te to sul acd comoion an fond tat eed corovion gto an noma teks Or in-4um), The vse undergone analysis el extend unde ight ik ring. folowing athe bes stable migaton action 0 be consed Equipetio be dconisioned Egupmeat eign Redon of peating pressure acceptable the proces flomed by cat eftive Inspection program wh repair anes by he rapt eas ‘Alot above ‘None ofthe above Po omp 115) The quality ofthe inspection data andthe analyse o interpretation wil real fet he A. Levelofrisk mitigation Bo Levelof file Level of presieton D.Nonear the above ) Following are the tos vical to chic isk mitigation through inspection ‘A. Prope inspection methods 1B. Proper da anal tools © Bothaand’ D. Alloftieabove 115), Which ys a major len oer al sik managment stegy A. spection 8 Mitexson CG Consegsence DB Fate 116), Which inspection tacaigue for piping eicult would be considered to have it ono benefit ifthe deterioration mechan rests in unpediae ca iad comosin A. Sporthlcknessrexngs 8) Utmsonic resdings c_Radiograpay D.—Alloftbe above 117) nthe ease of tcl conosin, which nspecsonehnique mane ative A. Ultwoni forthiekes monaring 5 Radiornphy © Utrsonie fw dteton Di None ofthe stove 119) Which ar the best cases tat may cause darirtion an incre th sk of th equipo wen ‘managing he sk with ection ates |A. Moisture ingress o equipment eadng sor ply-tione ai eeking 1B. “Ineral inspection of ss ined vent . Risk asoined with sting down and stating up D. Alloftheabove is) ‘permed to determine what size flaws, if found in fitre nspections, "would equi repair or msgmentrepceet AL Fit nessforservice 1B Ri analysis CC. Process hazard anal D. Alloftheabove ‘Questions completed apo 127 cape MAS Keddmddamm

You might also like