Design of Fixed Column Base Joints
Design of Fixed Column Base Joints
Contents
1.
Introduction
2.
Parameters
3.
4.
Design situation 1: Dimension a base plate for the loading at the base of a given
column section
5.
12
Page 1
1.
Introduction
This NCCI covers the design of fixed bases of I section columns transmitting a normal force,
a shear force and a moment. The rectangular base plate is welded to the column section in a
symmetrical position so that it has projections beyond the column flange outer edges on all
sides (see Figure 1.1). Anchor bolts rows, normal to the column major axis, are symmetrically
placed about the column minor axis. The base plate may be located eccentrically on the
concrete foundation.
In practice, the following two design situations are encountered:
1.
The column section and the concomitant design normal force, shear force and moment
are known. The dimensions of the required base plate and anchor bolts are to be
determined.
2.
The column section, base plate and foundation dimensions in a particular structure are
known. It is required to check that the different combinations of axial force, shear force
and moment that arise can be safely resisted.
The design procedures for these two situations are given in Sections 4 and 5 respectively.
Noting, in particular, the importance of the intrinsic relationship between the values of the
design moment and the concomitant normal force, the satisfactory determination of the
fundamental characteristics of the joint components (i.e. grout/foundation bearing resistance,
base plate area, base plat thickness, anchor bolt dimensions and anchor bolt positions) usually
requires separate checking of all joint components for the concomitant forces and moments
resulting from a number of different load combination cases acting on the structure.
The shear force resistance of the base plate joint is either covered by SN037 and, if the
friction resistance is insufficient, by SN043. The shear force is not considered to have any
effect of the joint resistance to a combination of a normal force and a moment.
The stiffness of the base plate joint is obtained using SN045.
Page 2
1
5
2
3
df
bp
bf
hp
hf
Key :
1. I section column
2. Base plate
3. Grout
4. Concrete foundation
5. Anchor bolt
Figure 1.1
Page 3
2.
Parameters
Table 2.1
Parameters
Definition
beff
Definition
As
Ft,Rd
eN
Ft,bond,Rd
Ft,anchor,Rd
bf, hf, df
= min(Ft,Rd: Ft,bond,Rd)
fyb
FT,l,Rd
fyp
FT,r,Rd
fjd
FC,l,Rd
fcd
FC,r,Rd
LB
bp, hp, tp
MEd
Mj,Ed
beff, leff
m, n, e
zT,r
zT,l
zC,l
zC,r
Mj,Rd
NEd
Nj,Ed
M0
Nj,Rd
Page 4
3.
3.1
Design model
The design model for a fixed column base plate joint for a combined normal force plus a
moment about the major column axis is given in 6.2.8 of EN 1993-1-8.
The most common load distributions in a fixed column base joint, shown in Figure 3.1 a), b)
and c) respectively, are as follows:
Compression on both sides of the joint due to a dominant axial compression load
combined with
- either a clockwise moment
- or an anticlockwise moment.
Tension on the left hand side and compression on the right hand side due to a dominant
clockwise moment combined with
- either a compressive axial load
Created on Wednesday, November 08, 2006
This material is copyright - all rights reserved. Use of this document is subject to the terms and conditions of the Access Steel Licence Agreement
Page 5
M
N
a)
b)
M
c)
d)
Key :
a)
b)
Compression on the right hand side and tension on the left hand side
c)
Compression on the left hand side and tension on the right hand side
d)
Figure 3.1
3.2
Load distribution
Resistance in bearing
For the compression side of a joint the design approach is to ensure that the bearing stresses
under the base plate neither exceed the design bearing strength of the foundation joint
material nor lead to excessive bending of the base plate.
The design model assumes that the bearing resistance is provided by one or both of the
column flange T-stubs in compression, depending on whether compression reigns over part or
all of the column base plate respectively as shown in Figure 3.1. For a flange T-stub in
compression the bearing stresses are assumed to be uniformly distributed over the T-stub area
centred beneath the flange as shown in Figure 3.2. In the simplified approach given in
EN 1993-1-8 for the design of column base joints transferring moment, no direct account is
taken for any compression force that may be transferred through a column web T-stub in
compression.
In this NCCI, reference is made to SN037 for the design resistance of T-stubs in compression.
Page 6
3.3
The design model for an anchor bolt row in tension is similar to that for a bolt row of an end
plate connection transmitting moment. Therefore, the design approach is to ensure that the
tensile force in the anchor bolt row does not exceed either of the following;
The design tensile resistance of the base plate tension T stub. This involves the
consideration of the three basic tension T stub failure modes as identified in
Table 6.2 of EN 1993-1-8. If relevant, the single mode replacing modes 1 and 2 shall be
considered (see Table 6.2 EN 1993-1-8). The latter mode is possible if the prying effect
disappears with the loss of contact between the base plate edge and the foundation
because of anchor bolt elongation.
If necessary, i.e. for anchor bolt rows between the column flanges, the design resistance
in tension of the column web component of the T stub.
The design approach is identical to that for a bolt row of an end plate except that when
determining the resistance of the anchor bolt in tension one must also consider that the
anchorage bond resistance may be more critical.
In the simplified mechanical model the resistance in tension is presented for the case of there
being one anchor bolt row only. To permit the direct application of the design rules given for
the case of anchor bolt rows on both sides of the column flange, it is recommended to use an
equivalent single row having a total tensile resistance of the two rows acting together at the
centroid. It is not recommended to consider that other rows than those about the column
flanges contribute to the resistance of a fixed column base subjected to a moment combined
with an axial load.
3.4
Limitations
The design rules provided are limited to applications for the types of un-stiffened column base
plates shown in Figure 1.1 subjected to axial load in combination with moment acting about
the column major axis only. The rules cover the case of two anchor bolts in a row.
EN 1992-1-1 does not provide design rules for the bond anchorage resistance of plain bars. It
is also believed also that the rules provided for the bends and hooks of the ribbed bars should
not be applied to plain bars. No rules are given for the design of anchored bolts, such as with
anchor plates or special heads. These issues may the subject of provisions in the National
Annexes.
In the present NCCI the design basic anchorage length of plain anchor bolts is taken as that
for a ribbed bar divided by a factor of 2,25. This is in accordance with some existing national
rules for reinforced concrete and with initial drafts for Eurocode 2. It is to be noted that,
according to EN 1993-1-8 6.2.6.12(5) that the yield strength of the steel for bent or hooked
anchor bars should not exceed 300 N/mm.
Page 7
1
NEd
2
MEd
la
FT,l
FC,r
zT,l
zC,r
z
c tfc c
c tfc c
beff,c
beff,c
6
c
2
zT,l
zC,r
zT,l
zC,r
z
z
Key:
1
Both the normal force and the moment applied by the column to the column base plate joint are shown acting in the
positive sense as defined by EN 1993-1-8, i.e. tensile axial forces are positive and positive moments act clockwise.
Left-side of the base plate joint when the anchor bolts are in tension: the tensile force is resisted by the T stub formed by
the base plate and the anchor bolt row.
Right side of the base plate joint when in compression: foundation joint offers bearing resistance on the underside of the
base plate T stub which is acting in bending off the column flange.
Lever arm between the tension force in the anchor bolts and the compression force under the base plate.
Anchor bolts.
Figure 3.2
Compression and anchor bolt tension induced by the normal force and moment
4.
Design situation 1: Dimension a base plate for
the loading at the base of a given column section
4.1
It is recommended that the base plates be of the long projection type of sufficient width so
as to allow having an anchor bolt row situated on the projection on each side of the column.
This facilitates providing adequate compression resistance and, by increasing the lever arm
between the compression and the tensile zones, reduces the mechanical resistance
requirements on the anchor bolts in tension.
Page 8
In the following the dimensioning of a symmetric base plate joint is presented. A long
projection type of base is used, as shown in Figure 4.1, with anchor bolts
with a single row on the extended part of the base plate
or in two rows, one each side of the flange.
Each row has two anchor bolts symmetrically placed about the column minor axis.
hc
1
mx e x
w
bp
tfc
1
e
m2
m
bp
e
m2
Key:
1.
2.
3.
mx ex
Column flange
Column web
Column base plate
Figure 4.1
4.2
Choice of materials
It is necessary to choose the concrete class, the base plate steel and the anchor bolt class. For
typical buildings, in some countries it has been usual practice to recommend class 4.6 anchor
bolts while elsewhere class 8.8 plate ended anchors have become common. The base plate is
not necessarily of the same steel grade as that of the column section.
M Ed
N
Ed
hc tfc
2
M Ed
N
+ Ed
hc tfc
2
Page 9
Note: while the expressions above give the absolute values for the two forces, the sign of the
axial load NEd (positive if tensile, negative if compressive) is to be used in them. In order to
simplify the notation NEd , MEd , NRd , and MRd are written for N j,Ed , Mj,Ed , Nj,Rd and Mj,Rd
respectively.
1
(lb f bd ) ,
2,25
(132 ) / 100
( lb f bd ) .
2,25
Where lb is the basic anchorage length of the anchor bolt (starting from the bottom
surface of the grout down into the foundation) and fbd is the design bond strength of the
concrete (8.4.2(2) of EN 1992-1-1).
-
Note: EN 1992-1-1 provides design bond strengths for ribbed bars only. It is
assumed in the present NCCI that the design value for a plain bar is the value given
in 8.4 of EN 1992-1-1 (i.e. the design value for a ribbed bar of the same diameter in
similar concrete and conditions) divided by 2,25. The relevant National Annex may
provide guidance.
0,9 f ub As
Mb,traction
Annex A of this NCCI gives the design bond anchorage resistance of often used diameters of
class 4.6 anchor bolts as a function of the basic anchorage length for typical foundation
concrete.
A reduced anchorage depth into the foundation is required if bent or hooked anchor bolts are
used. However the equivalent bond anchorage length for bends and hooks of plain bars is not
Page 10
provided by EN 1993-1-1 so that it is necessary to adopt other rules such as those in existing
national standards or international recognised recommendations to provide them.
The final choice of the anchor bolt details, in particular those concerning anchoring, usually
requires knowledge of the foundation depth.
The design resistance of a single anchor bolt Ft, anchor, Rd is taken as:
Ft,anchor,Rd = min [Ft,bond, Rd ; Ft,Rd ]
2Ft,anchor,Rd max(FT,Ed)
As a first estimate, it is assumed that the full tensile resistance of the anchor bolt section can
0,9 f ub As
. The required bolt section is given as follows:
be attained: Ft,anchor,Rd =
M2
M2
3,6 f ub
The latter assumption about the anchor bolt tensile resistance needs to be checked when the
final details of the bond anchorage lengths are established. Experience with standard
foundation design and construction practice in a particular region will guide the designer in
the choice of a suitable anchor bolt. If full anchorage for any given diameter and class of
anchor bolt cannot be assured, it is necessary to adopt a lower resistance than the design
tensile resistance of the section.
The base plate thickness tp obtained for the compression design of the base plate may not be
adequate.
Based on the mode 1 resistance (full plastic mechanism) the following estimate of the plate
thickness is obtained (see Figure 4.1 for the parameters):
Page 11
4.6
FT, Ed M0
f yp 2
FT, Ed M0
f yp 4
Design resistance checks given in Section 5 below should be carried out, modifications being
made if necessary to the base plate and/or anchor bolt dimensions.
5.
Design situation 2: Determine the design
resistances of a given base plate
5.1
Joint type
It is assumed below that the joint is symmetric with one row or two rows of anchor bolts (two
per row) on each side of the joint (see Figure 5.1).
Note: For a symmetric joint the distances z T,l = z T,r = z T and z C,l = z C,r = zC.
c tfc c
c tfc c
c
beff,c
beff,c
zT,l
zC,r
zT,l
zC,r
z
Figure 5.1
5.2
Compression and anchor bolt tension induced by the applied normal force and
moment
The design tensile resistance of an anchor bolt, Ft,anchor,Rd, is obtained from 4.5.1 above:
Ft,anchor,Rd = min [Ft,bond,Rd ; Ft,Rd ]
5.3
Refer to Section 5 of SN037 to provide the axial compressive resistance of the joint. This
value is valid when the concomitant applied moment is zero.
Page 12
It provides a first indication of the possible (NEd, MEd) combinations that can be applied to the
joint.
It should be noted that if a part of the axial compression is transferred through a column web
T-stub, the resistance obtained will exceed the sum of the resistances for the two column
flange T-Stubs in compression. In the EN 1993-1-8 simplified model, the axial resistance in
compression reduces to the latter value when the applied moment is zero.
The resistance of each flange T-stub in compression is written here as FC,Rd .The axial
compressive resistance is then given as:
NC,Rd = -(2 FC,Rd) , the negative sign indicating that the load is compressive.
5.4
The resistance in tension of the anchor bolt rows on both sides of the joint are obtained.
The possible modes of failure of a T-stub in tension are shown schematically in Figure 5.2.
The effective T stub length is as follows (see Figure 4.1 for the definition of the geometric
parameters):
Outer anchor bolt row :
o
For the special mode indicated in Figure 5.2 e), the T stub length is that given above for
mode 1.
Page 13
Ft
Ft
m
e
Ft
a)
b)
Ft
Ft
e)
c)
d)
Key:
a)
b)
Partial plastic mechanism with anchor bolt failure (failure Mode 2),
c)
d)
e)
Failure by flexural yielding of the flange in conjunction with separation of the base plate from the foundation due to
anchor bolt elongation (the prying force becomes null). It replaces failure Modes 1 and 2
Figure 5.2
The special failure mode replacing mode 1 and mode 2 is possible only when the following
condition on the anchor bolt length is met:
8,8 As
Lb > L =
leff,1
m
t p
Where the distance m is as shown in Figure 5.2 and the effective T stub length leff is
determined above.
T stub resistance in tension
Determine the resistance of the T stub in tension for the bolt row. The design resistance of a
bolt row will be the least value for the failure modes shown in Figure 5.2. When considering
the failure modes of a T stub in tension the design tensile resistance of an anchor bolt in
tension is to be taken Ft, anchor, Rd.
The plastic hinge flexural resistance is given by: M pl,Rd = leff mpl,Rd = leff
t p2 f y
4 M0
This value may be differ between mode 1 (with leff,1 ) and mode 2 (with leff,2 ).
The value of the resistance of a T-stub in tension Ft,Rd is taken as the least of the following
resistances as relevant:
Page 14
4 M pl,Rd,1
Mode 1-2: If the condition requiring adopting the special mode is met, the resistances
for modes 1 and 2 are replaced by
o : Ft,1/2,Rd =
2 M pl,Rd,1
m
2 M pl,Rd,2 + 2nFt,anchor,Rd
m+n
, n = min(e;1,25m)
Mode 4: Column web in tension for inner anchor bolt rows -: Ft,wc,Rd = beff,t,wct wc
f y,wc
M0
The resistance of all the anchor bolt rows present are calculated. The design resistance for the
side in tension is taken as:
FT,Rd = Ft,Rd
The summation sign allows considering having either one bolt row on each side of the joint or
two bolt rows on each side of the joint.
Axial resistance in tension of the joint
5.5
Moment resistance
If the axial load is zero the moment resistance of the symmetric joint is given as the least of
the following two values:
M0,Rd = min ( z FT,Rd : z FC,Rd), where the lever arm z = zT + zC
5.6
When the check is limited to verifying that the joint can resist a given (MEd, NEd) combination,
the checks can be limited to the following steps:
a) The distribution of stresses in the column section will provide a direct indication as to
which load distribution reigns in the base plate joint. This information can be used to
identify the load distribution case to be examined in table 6.7 of EN 1993-1-8.
M Ed
for the applied
N Ed
combination is (MEd, NEd). It should be noted that the eccentricity value may be
positive or negative depending on the signs of the forces and moments.
Page 15
c) The resistances of the bolt row T stubs in tension, FT,Rd, are obtained in 5.3 above.
Because the joint is symmetric the design resistances on both sides in tension will be
equal. (This calculation is not required if the entire section is in compression).
d) The resistance of the column flange T stub in compression, FC,Rd can be obtained from
5.2 above, the value being taken as that for one column flange T-stub only. Because
the joint is symmetric the design resistances on both sides in compression will be
equal. (This calculation is not required if the entire section is in tension).
e) The geometric parameters, in particular the various lever arms, are obtained as shown
in Figure 5.1. Because of the joint symmetry z T,l = z T,r = z T and z C,l = z C,r = zC.
f) From the distribution of stresses in the column identify the case to be examined. The
Mj,Rd moment resistance, applied simultaneously with the axial load, NEd , is obtained
by the direct application of the relevant formulae given in Table 5.1 (see
table 6.7 of EN 1993-1-8).
g) Check that the moment, MEd and MRd , are of the same sign and that M Ed M Rd . If
so, the joint is adequate to resist the load combination given.
The formulae given in Table 5.1 are for symmetric joints and have been adapted from those in
table 6.7 of EN 1993-1-8.
Table 5.1
Loading
Lever arm z
z = zT,l + zC,r
Right side in
compression
z = z T + zC
The smaller of
z = zT,l + zT,r
z = z T + zT
The smaller of
Left side in
compression
z = zC,l + zT,r
z = z C + zT
The smaller of
Left side in
compression
z = zC,l + zC,r
NEd 0 and
Right side in
compression
z = z C + zC
The smaller of
e > zT,l
NEd 0 and
e -zC,r
FT, Rd z
FC, Rd z
and
zC / e + 1
zT / e + 1
-zT,r < e 0
FT, Rd z
FT, Rd z
and
zT / e + 1
zT / e 1
e -zT,r
NEd 0 and
e > zC,l
F z
FC, Rd z
and T, Rd
zT / e + 1
zC / e 1
NEd 0 and
-zC,r < e 0
FC, Rd z
FC, Rd z
and
zC / e + 1
zC / e 1
M Ed
N Ed
The formulae above are those for a symmetric joint so that: z T,l = z T,r = z T and z C,l = z C,r = zC
If it is found that M Ed M Rd the joint is adequate.
Page 16
5.7
When the joint design resistance is attained under a combination (MEd, NEd) the following
holds:
MEd = MRd
NEd = NRd
e=
M Ed
M
= Rd
N Ed
N Rd
All of the latter parameters can have both positive and negative values. By varying the value
of the equivalent eccentricity within the range indicated for each loading situation (see
Figure 3.1, Table 5.1 and Table 5.2), the limiting design condition is found to be a boundary
plotted with, for instance, axial load NRd on the vertical axis and moment MRd on the
horizontal axis (see Figure 5.3).
It is found that the boundary for the type of base plate joint treated here is made up of linear
segments which can be plotted using the expressions between MRd and NRd given in Table 5.2.
The diagram shown in Figure 5.3 is for the particular case of a symmetric joint with two bolt
rows on each side for which it has been assumed that the distances from the column major
axis to the centroids of the compression T stub area under a flange and of anchor bolt tension
area, zC and zT respectively, are equal. When the latter distances are not equal, the enclosed
area differs slightly from the diamond shape.
The following type of interaction diagram is obtained. It allows rapid checking of any load
combination applied to the base plate joint. All allowable load combinations fall on or within
the surface defined by the boundaries corresponding to the relevant limiting design condition.
(1) : +NT.Rd
NEd
(3) : +M0,Rd
(4) : -M0,Rd
MEd
(5)
(2) : -NC,Rd
Key:
Figure 5.3
Page 17
Table 5.2
Interaction of design resistances NRd and MRd for fixed column bases
Loading
Lever arm
z
NRd 0 and
Right side in
compression
z
+ N Rd zT
2
Tension side critical :
z
+ N Rd zT
2
Tension side critical :
Dominant positive
z = z T + zC
moment with a
tensile or
compressive load (see
figure 5.1)
Dominant axial
tensile load with a
positive or negative
moment
z = 2 zT
Both sides in
compression.
Axial compression
(negative) dominant,
with a positive or
negative moment
M Rd = N T, Rd
z
N Rd zC
2
Left side in
compression
Dominant negative
moment with a
compressive or
tensile axial load
M Rd = N C, Rd
z = 2 zC
M Rd = ( N T, Rd N Rd )
z
2
e -zC
M Rd = N C, Rd
M Rd = N T, Rd
z
+ N Rd zC
2
-zT < e 0
M Rd = ( N T, Rd N Rd )
z
2
NRd 0 and
z
N Rd zT
2
Tension side critical :
z
N Rd zT
2
Tension side critical :
M Rd = N C,Rd
e > zC
M Rd = N C, Rd
M Rd = N T, Rd
z
+ N Rd zC
2
M Rd = N T,Rd
z
+ N Rd zC
2
NRd 0 and
0 < e < zC
NRd 0 and
-zC < e 0
M Rd = ( N C, Rd N Rd )
z
2
M Rd = ( N C, Rd N Rd )
z
2
M Ed
.
N Ed
The values of NC,Rd and NT,Rd are obtained from 5.3 and 5.4 respectively.
The formulae are for a symmetric joint so that: z T,l = z T,r = z T and z C,l = z C,r = z C
Page 18
90,0
80,0
M16
M18
M20
M22
M24
M27
M30
M33
M36
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure A.1
Anchorage bond resistance and tensile resistance of anchor bolts Steel 4.6 and
concrete C20/25
Page 19
100,0
90,0
80,0
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure A.2
Anchorage bond resistance and tensile resistance of anchor bolts Steel 4.6 and
concrete C30/37
120,0
110,0
100,0
90,0
80,0
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure A.3
Anchorage bond resistance and tensile resistance of anchor bolts Steel 4.6 and
concrete C40/50
Page 20
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure A.4
Anchorage bond resistance and tensile resistance of anchor bolts Steel 5.6 and
concrete C20/25
100,0
90,0
80,0
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure A.5
Anchorage bond resistance and tensile resistance of anchor bolts Steel 5.6 and
concrete C40/50
Page 21
120,0
110,0
100,0
90,0
80,0
70,0
60,0
50,0
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
0,0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure A.6
Anchorage bond resistance and tensile resistance of anchor bolts Steel 5.6 and
concrete C40/50
Page 22
Quality Record
RESOURCE TITLE
Reference(s)
ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
Name
Company
Date
Created by
Ivor Ryan
CTICM
06/02/2006
Alain Bureau
CTICM
06/02/2006
1. UK
G W Owens
SCI
07/04/06
2. France
A Bureau
CTICM
07/04/06
3. Sweden
B Uppfeldt
SBI
07/04/06
4. Germany
C Mller
RWTH
07/04/06
5. Spain
J Chica
Labein
07/04/06
G W Owens
SCI
18/08/06
Page 23