100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views7 pages

Design of Eccentric Loaded Footing Using Tedds

The document provides details of the analysis and design of a concrete foundation for a column. It includes calculations of loads, moments, shear forces, and reinforcement requirements according to code. The foundation dimensions and soil properties are given. Load combinations are considered from the code. Bearing capacity, moment capacity, shear capacity and reinforcement requirements are calculated and found to meet the code requirements.

Uploaded by

Roberto Catalani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
2K views7 pages

Design of Eccentric Loaded Footing Using Tedds

The document provides details of the analysis and design of a concrete foundation for a column. It includes calculations of loads, moments, shear forces, and reinforcement requirements according to code. The foundation dimensions and soil properties are given. Load combinations are considered from the code. Bearing capacity, moment capacity, shear capacity and reinforcement requirements are calculated and found to meet the code requirements.

Uploaded by

Roberto Catalani
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

1
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS & DESIGN (ACI318)


In accordance with ACI318-11 incorporating Errata as of August 8, 2014
Tedds calculation version 3.0.00

FOUNDATION ANALYSIS
Length of foundation;

Lx = 10 ft

Width of foundation;

Ly = 5 ft

Foundation area;

A = Lx Ly = 50 ft2

Depth of foundation;

h = 12 in

Depth of soil over foundation;

hsoil = 18 in

Density of concrete;

conc = 150.0 lb/ft3

2.279 ksf

2.279 ksf

Column no.1 details


Length of column;

lx1 = 18.00 in

Width of column;

ly1 = 24.00 in

position in x-axis;

x1 = 60.00 in

position in y-axis;

y1 = 12.00 in

Soil properties
Gross allowable bearing pressure;

qallow_Gross = 2.5 ksf

Density of soil;

soil = 120.0 lb/ft3

Angle of internal friction;

b = 30.0 deg

Design base friction angle;

bb = 30.0 deg

Coefficient of base friction;

tan(bb) = 0.577

Dead surcharge load;

FDsur = 50 psf

Self weight;

Fswt = h conc = 150 psf

Soil weight;

Fsoil = hsoil soil = 180 psf

Column no.1 loads


Dead load in z;

FDz1 = 16.7 kips

Live load in z;

FLz1 = 18.5 kips

Live roof load in z;

FLrz1 = 4.2 kips

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

2
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

Foundation analysis for soil and stability


Load combinations per ASCE 7-10
1.0D (0.526)
1.0D + 1.0Lr (0.619)
1.0D + 1.0S (0.526)
1.0D + 1.0R (0.526)
1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr (0.911)
1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75S (0.839)
1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75R (0.839)
(1.0 + 0.14 SDS)D + 0.7E (0.542)
(1.0 + 0.10 SDS)D + 0.75L + 0.75S + 0.525E (0.850)
(0.6 - 0.14 SDS)D + 0.7E (0.299)
Combination 6 results: 1.0D + 0.75L + 0.75Lr
Forces on foundation
Force in z-axis;

Fdz = D A (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + D FDz1 + L FLz1 + Lr FLrz1 = 52.7


kips

Moments on foundation
Moment in x-axis, about x is 0;

Mdx = D (A (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) Lx / 2) + D (FDz1 x1) + L (FLz1 x1)


+ Lr (FLrz1 x1) = 263.4 kip_ft

Moment in y-axis, about y is 0;

Mdy = D (A (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) Ly / 2) + D (FDz1 y1) + L (FLz1 y1)


+ Lr (FLrz1 y1) = 81.2 kip_ft

Uplift verification
Vertical force;

Fdz = 52.675 kips


PASS - Foundation is not subject to uplift

Bearing resistance
Eccentricity of base reaction
Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis;

edx = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 0 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis;

edy = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = -11.507 in

Length of bearing in y-axis;

L'yd = min(Ly,3 (Ly / 2 - abs(edy))) = 55.478 in

Pad base pressures


q1 = 2 Fdz / (3 Lx (Ly / 2 + edy)) = 2.279 ksf
q2 = 0 ksf
q3 = 2 Fdz / (3 Lx (Ly / 2 + edy)) = 2.279 ksf
q4 = 0 ksf
Minimum base pressure;

qmin = min(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 0 ksf

Maximum base pressure;

qmax = max(q1,q2,q3,q4) = 2.279 ksf

Allowable bearing capacity


Allowable bearing capacity;

qallow = qallow_Gross = 2.5 ksf


qmax / qallow = 0.911
PASS - Allowable bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

3
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

FOUNDATION DESIGN (ACI318)


In accordance with ACI318-11 incorporating Errata as of August 8, 2014
Material details
Compressive strength of concrete;

fc = 3500 psi

Yield strength of reinforcement;

fy = 60000 psi

Cover to reinforcement;
Concrete type;

cnom = 3 in
Normal weight

Concrete modification factor;

= 1.00

Column type;

Concrete

Analysis and design of concrete footing


Load combinations per ASCE 7-10
1.4D (0.359)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr (0.957)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5S (0.909)
1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5R (0.909)
1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6Lr (0.808)
1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6S (0.657)
1.2D + 1.0L + 1.6R (0.657)
(1.2 + 0.2 SDS)D + 1.0L + 0.2S + 1.0E (0.666)
(0.9 - 0.2 SDS)D + 1.0E (0.220)
Combination 2 results: 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5Lr
Forces on foundation
Ultimate force in z-axis;

Fuz = D A (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) + D FDz1 + L FLz1 + Lr FLrz1 = 74.5


kips

Moments on foundation
Ultimate moment in x-axis, about x is 0;

Mux = D (A (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) Lx / 2) + D (FDz1 x1) + L (FLz1 x1)


+ Lr (FLrz1 x1) = 372.4 kip_ft

Ultimate moment in y-axis, about y is 0;

Muy = D (A (Fswt + Fsoil + FDsur) Ly / 2) + D (FDz1 y1) + L (FLz1 y1)


+ Lr (FLrz1 y1) = 108.7 kip_ft

Eccentricity of base reaction


Eccentricity of base reaction in x-axis;

eux = Mux / Fuz - Lx / 2 = 0 in

Eccentricity of base reaction in y-axis;

euy = Muy / Fuz - Ly / 2 = -12.489 in

Length of bearing in y-axis;

L'yu = min(Ly,3 (Ly / 2 - abs(euy))) = 52.532 in

Pad base pressures


qu1 = 2 Fuz / (3 Lx (Ly / 2 + euy)) = 3.402 ksf
qu2 = 0 ksf
qu3 = 2 Fuz / (3 Lx (Ly / 2 + euy)) = 3.402 ksf
qu4 = 0 ksf
Minimum ultimate base pressure;

qumin = min(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 0 ksf

Maximum ultimate base pressure;

qumax = max(qu1,qu2,qu3,qu4) = 3.402 ksf

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

4
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Shear diagram, x axis


Shear (kips)

22.3

31.1

0
0

2
-22.3

-31.1

Moment diagram, x axis


Moment (kip_ft)

0
1

56.2

77.8

Shear diagram, y axis


Shear (kips)

25.6
4.2 4.2

-0.7
0

-26.1

Moment diagram, y axis


Moment (kip_ft)

-6
0 0.0
1

13.4

Moment design, x direction, positive moment


Ultimate bending moment;
Tension reinforcement provided;

Mu.x.max = 56.238 kip_ft


5 No.5 bottom bars (13.3 in c/c)

Date

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

5
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Chk'd by

Date

Area of tension reinforcement provided;

Asx.bot.prov = 1.55 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4);

As.min = 0.0018 Ly h = 1.296 in2

App'd by

Date

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum


smax = min(3 h, 18 in) = 18 in

Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4);

PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing


Depth to tension reinforcement;

d = h - cnom - x.bot / 2 = 8.688 in

Depth of compression block;

a = Asx.bot.prov fy / (0.85 f'c Ly) = 0.521 in

Neutral axis factor;

1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis;

c = a / 1 = 0.613 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5);

t = 0.003 d / c - 0.003 = 0.03952


PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004

Nominal moment capacity;

Mn = Asx.bot.prov fy (d - a / 2) = 65.309 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor;

f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002) (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.900

Design moment capacity;

Mn = f Mn = 58.778 kip_ft
Mu.x.max / Mn = 0.957
PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load

One-way shear design, x direction


Ultimate shear force;

Vu.x = 22.28 kips

Depth to reinforcement;

dv = h - cnom - y.bot - x.bot / 2 = 8.062 in

Shear strength reduction factor;

v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3);

Vn = 2 (f'c 1 psi) Ly dv = 57.238 kips


Vn = v Vn = 42.929 kips

Design shear capacity;

Vu.x / Vn = 0.519
PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load
Footing geometry factor (15.4.4.2);

f = Lx / Ly = 2.000

Area of reinf. req. for uniform distribution (CRSI);

Asreq = (Mu.y.max / (f fy (d - a / 2))) 2 f / (f + 1) = 0.000 in2


PASS - Reinforcement can be distributed uniformly

Moment design, y direction, negative moment


Ultimate bending moment;
Tension reinforcement provided;

Mu.y.min = -5.957 kip_ft


9 No.5 top bars (14.1 in c/c)

Area of tension reinforcement provided;

Asy.top.prov = 2.79 in2

Minimum area of reinforcement (10.5.4);

As.min = 0.0018 Lx h = 2.592 in2

Maximum spacing of reinforcement (10.5.4);

smax = min(3 h, 18 in) = 18 in

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided exceeds minimum


PASS - Maximum permissible reinforcement spacing exceeds actual spacing
Depth to tension reinforcement;

d = h - cnom - y.top / 2 = 8.688 in

Depth of compression block;

a = Asy.top.prov fy / (0.85 f'c Lx) = 0.469 in

Neutral axis factor;

1 = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis;

c = a / 1 = 0.552 in

Strain in tensile reinforcement (10.3.5);

t = 0.003 d / c - 0.003 = 0.04424


PASS - Tensile strain exceeds minimum required, 0.004

Nominal moment capacity;

Mn = Asy.top.prov fy (d - a / 2) = 117.92 kip_ft

Flexural strength reduction factor;

f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002) (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.900

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

6
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Design moment capacity;

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

Mn = f Mn = 106.128 kip_ft
abs(Mu.y.min) / Mn = 0.056
PASS - Design moment capacity exceeds ultimate moment load

One-way shear design, y direction


Ultimate shear force;

Vu.y = 4.176 kips

Depth to reinforcement;

dv = min(h - cnom - y.bot / 2,h - cnom - y.top / 2) = 8.688 in

Shear strength reduction factor;

v = 0.75

Nominal shear capacity (Eq. 11-3);

Vn = 2 (f'c 1 psi) Lx dv = 123.35 kips

Design shear capacity;

Vn = v Vn = 92.513 kips
Vu.y / Vn = 0.045
PASS - Design shear capacity exceeds ultimate shear load

Two-way shear design at column 1


Depth to reinforcement;

dv2 = 8.375 in

Shear perimeter length (11.11.1.2);

lxp = 26.375 in

Shear perimeter width (11.11.1.2);

lyp = 28.188 in

Shear perimeter (11.11.1.2);

bo = 2 lyp + lxp = 82.750 in

Shear area;

Ap = lxp lyp = 743.445 in2

Surcharge loaded area;

Asur = Ap - lx1 ly1 = 311.445 in2

Ultimate bearing pressure at center of shear area; qup.avg = 2.490 ksf


Ultimate shear load;

Fup = D FDz1 + L FLz1 + Lr FLrz1 + D Ap Fswt + D Asur Fsoil + D


Asur FDsur - qup.avg Ap = 40.347 kips

Ultimate shear stress from vertical load;

vug = max(Fup / (bo d),0 psi) = 56.124 psi

Column geometry factor (11.11.2.1);

= ly1 / lx1 = 1.33

Column location factor (11.11.2.1);

s =30

Concrete shear strength (11.11.2.1);

vcpa = (2 + 4 / ) (f'c 1 psi) = 295.804 psi


vcpb = (s dv2 / bo + 2) (f'c 1 psi) = 297.949 psi
vcpc = 4 (f'c 1 psi) = 236.643 psi
vcp = min(vcpa,vcpb,vcpc) = 236.643 psi

Shear strength reduction factor;

v = 0.75

Nominal shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-2);

vn = vcp = 236.643 psi

Design shear stress capacity (Eq. 11-1);

vn = v vn = 177.482 psi
vug / vn = 0.316
PASS - Design shear stress capacity exceeds ultimate shear stress load

POAGE

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

7
Calc. by

Date

5/13/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

6 No.5 bottom bars (22.6 in c/c)


9 No.5 top bars (14.1 in c/c)

1
5 No.5 bottom bars (13.3 in c/c)

Date

You might also like