Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Student Surname/s:
Given names:
S00142914
Binks
Melissa Lynne
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
Date: 29/03/13
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
References
Alexander, P.A, (2005). The Path to Competence: A Lifespan Developmental Perspective on Reading,
Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 413-436. Doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3704_1
Arthur, L., Beecher, B., Death, E., Dockett, S., & Farmer, S. (2012). Programming and planning in early
childhood settings (5th Ed.). South Melbourne, Victoria: Cengage.
McCrae, R., Costa, P., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebickova, M., Avia, M., Sanz, J., SanchezBernardos, M., Kusdil, M., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P., Smith, Peter B., (2000). Nature over
nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality & Social
Psychology, 78(1), 173186. Retrieved from http://sfx.unilinc.edu.au/acu?ctx_ver=Z39.882004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2013-03-13T18:01:44IST&url_ver=Z39.882004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ct&xrfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Articleapa_articles&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nature Over
Nurture&rft.jtitle=Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology&rft.btitle=&rft.aulast=McCrae&rft.auinit=&rft.auinit1=&rft.auinitm=&rft.ausuffix=&rft.au=
McCrae, Robert
R&rft.aucorp=&rft.date=200001&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.part=&rft.quarter=&rft.ssn=&rft.spa
ge=173&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=&rft.artnum=&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
MacNaughton, G., & Davis, K. (2009). "Race" and early childhood education. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan.(pp.113 125) DOI: 10.1057/9780230623750
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
(Chapter 1: orienting concepts and ways of understanding the cultural nature of human
development)
Roopnarine, J. L., Lasker, J., Sacks, M., & Stores, M. (1998). The Cultural Contexts of Childrens Play.
In O.N. Saracho & B. Spodeck (Eds.), Multiple Perspectives on Play in Early Childhood Education
(pp. 148 166). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Retrieved from
http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy1.acu.edu.au/lib/australia ncathu/docDetail.action?
docID=10064654&adv.x=1&p00=race&f00=all&p01=early+childhood&f01=all&p02=education&f02
=all
Santos, A. J., & Winegar, L. T. (1999). Child social ethology and peer relations: a developmental
review of methodology and findings. acta ethologica, 2(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1007/PL00012226
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
EDFD167: Rubric for Assessment Task 1: Critical reflection on own sites of learning (40%)
Tutors Name and Tutorial Group: Jo Bird Thursday 1-3pm
Student Name: Melissa Binks
Aspects of
Assessment
High Distinction
Distinction
Credit
Pass
Unsatisfactory
Five critical
reflections on own
sites of learning in
relation to key ideas
and concepts
introduced during
weeks 1 - 5
Five responses
included. Each
response is approx
320 words.
Five responses
included. Each
response is approx
320 words.
Five responses
included. Each
response is approx
320 words.
Five responses
included. Each
response is approx
320 words.
Each response
engages critically
with key ideas and
concepts presented
each week.
Demonstrates a
very high degree of
analytical thinking.
Each response
engages critically
with key ideas and
concepts presented
each week.
Demonstrates a
high degree of
analytical thinking.
Each response
engages with some
of the key ideas
and concepts
presented each
week.
Demonstrates good
analytical thinking.
Each response
engages with some
of the key ideas
and concepts
presented each
week. Evidence of
developing
analytical thinking
skills.
Incorporates the
literature showing a
highly advanced
ability to
comprehend and
synthesise complex
ideas presented in
relation to the
ideas/thoughts/refle
ctions being
discussed.
Incorporates the
literature showing
advanced ability to
comprehend and
synthesise complex
ideas presented in
relation to the
ideas/thoughts/refle
ctions being
discussed.
Incorporates the
literature showing
sound ability to
comprehend
complex ideas
presented in
relation to the
ideas/thoughts/refle
ctions being
discussed.
Incorporates the
literature showing
an ability to
comprehend the
ideas presented in
relation to the
ideas/thoughts/refle
ctions being
discussed.
Imprecise or no use
of the literature in
responses to
support
ideas/thoughts/refle
ctions
Draws on key
experiences to
support discussion
showing a
sophisticated
understanding of
the relationship
between the
experience and the
concept/idea being
discussed.
Draws on key
experiences to
support discussion
showing a strong
understanding of
the relationship
between the
experience and the
concept/idea being
discussed.
Draws on
experiences to
support discussion
showing a sound
understanding of
the relationship
between the
experience and the
concept/idea being
discussed.
Draws on key
experiences to
support discussion
showing an
understanding of
the relationship
between the
experience and the
concept/idea being
discussed.
10 marks
Reference to the
literature to support
ideas/thoughts/refle
ctions
10 marks
Specific detail
about challenges
and opportunities
provided to support
claims made about
reflections on sites
of learning
10 marks
Last updated:
Approved by:
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
Responses have
limited engagement
with key ideas and
concepts presented
each week. Limited
degree of analytical
thinking.
APA referencing is
used correctly in
text and reference
list.
Two or more peerreviewed readings
cited in each
response. One or
more is
independently
sourced.
Language is clear,
concise and on
topic. Use of
advanced
vocabulary.
Grammatically and
syntactically strong.
Last updated:
Approved by:
APA referencing is
used and almost
always correct in
text and reference
list.
Two or more peerreviewed readings
cited in each
response. One is
independently
sourced.
Language is clear,
concise, on topic.
Suitable
vocabulary,
grammatically and
syntactically strong.
February 2013
University Learning and Teaching Committee
APA referencing is
used and mostly
correct in text and
reference list.
Two peer-reviewed
readings cited in
each response.
One is
independently
sourced.
Language is clear
and on topic,
grammatically and
syntactically
correct.
APA referencing is
used but
inconsistently in
text or reference
list.
Two peer-reviewed
readings cited in
each response.
One is
independently
sourced.
Language is mostly
clear, grammatically
and syntactically
correct.