Final Report - Solar Cold Storage
Final Report - Solar Cold Storage
The current report has been prepared under the project Cold storage driven by solar and wind
energy and is financed by the Danish Energy Authority (EFP07-II no 33033-0297).
The objective of the project is to develop and demonstrate a grid-independent cold storage system
for perishable food, medicine or other goods, with a special focus on the need for such systems in
developing countries with a sparse and unreliable supply of electricity. The project is directly based
on the result from the international SolarChill project where a unique battery less solar driven
vaccine refrigerator was developed by Vestfrost in cooperation with Danish Technological Institute.
The project partners are:
- Danish Technological Institute (Project manager)
- Danfoss
- Grundfos
- Fresvik (Norway)
- Karise Klejnsmedie
Teknologisk Institut
Energi & Klima
December 2010
Table of content
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Background.............................................................................................................................. 4
Requirements for cooling and storage of perishable goods ....................................................... 5
Literature survey on cold stores................................................................................................ 7
Experiences with hybrid photovoltaic/wind power supply ...................................................... 11
Simulation of hybrid power supply ........................................................................................ 14
5.1. Summary of simulations ................................................................................................. 19
6. Concept study of refrigeration systems ................................................................................... 20
6.1. Temperature control and energy storage .......................................................................... 20
6.2. Compressor options ........................................................................................................ 21
6.3. Configuration structure ................................................................................................... 21
7. Design of prototype................................................................................................................ 29
8. Experiments with a PV powered refrigerator/freezer cluster ................................................... 33
Energy consumption.................................................................................................................. 42
9. Evaluation and perspectives ................................................................................................... 44
9.1 Spin-off projects ............................................................................................................. 45
9.2 Perspectives .................................................................................................................... 46
Annex 1. SolarChill B - Prototype and test results ......................................................................... 47
Annex 2. Abstracts of selected project references: ......................................................................... 53
Annex 3. Existing products of interest for the project: ................................................................... 57
Annex 4. Presentations, SolarChill B............................................................................................. 62
Annex 4. Milk Cooling ................................................................................................................. 70
1. Background
The current project is directly inspired by the so-called SolarChill project, which is an ongoing
international project aiming at the development and demonstration of battery less solar PV
(photovoltaic) refrigerators. The SolarChill project has already been successful in the demonstration
and dissemination of a large number of PV driven vaccine refrigerators of chest type named
SolarChill A. The core technology is a DC driven soft-start compressor, developed by Danfoss, that
allows direct connection to a relatively small PV array. By avoiding the battery, the system
becomes inherently robust, and cheaper than competitive products. The energy is stored as latent
heat in icepacks. SolarChill A is now being produced by the Danish company Vestfrost, and has
recently been approved by WHO.
This principle has been further refined and extended to a so-called SolarChill B refrigerator
intended for the general market of households and small restaurants and shops. This product is still
not in mass production, but some prototypes have been demonstrated in practical application.
The consortium behind SolarChill has received more awards for the project, and has received
numerous requests from interested customers and partners. Danish Technological Institute has been
heading the technical part of this project, including product development and testing.
In 2009 the World Bank joined the SolarChill partnership and infused additional funding (through a
GEF project) into the SolarChill project. This project intends to carry out extended field tests in
Colombia and Kenya and will transfer the technology to potential producers in the two countries.
Inspired by this success, the current project aims at scaling up the same principles to a typical
community or commercial type of cold store facility. A large scale system would benefit from a
better volume/surface ratio and a relatively lower cost per unit of storage volume. The focus is on
the areas of the world without access to regular grid power, but with plenty of natural solar and/or
wind resources for grid independent power supply.
Temperature
All fruits and vegetables have a 'critical temperature' below which undesirable and irreversible
reactions or 'chill damage' takes place. Carrots for example blacken and become soft, and the cell
structure of potatoes is destroyed. The storage temperature always has to be above this critical
temperature. Even though the thermostat is set at a temperature above the critical temperature, one
has to be careful that the thermostatic oscillation in temperature does not result in storage
temperature falling below the critical temperature. Even 0.5C below the critical temperature can
result in chill.
Maximum storage
Temperature Relative
time recommended
C
humidity % (ASHRAE
handbook 1982)
Storage time in
cold stores for
vegetables in
tropical countries
Apple
0-4
90-95
2-6m
Beetroot
95-99
Cabbage
95-99
5-6m
2m
Carrots
98-99
5-9m
2m
Cauliflower 0
95
2-4w
1w
Cucumber 10-13
90-95
Eggplant
8-10
90-95
Lettuce
95-99
Leeks
95
1-3m
1m
Oranges
0-4
85-90
3-4m
Pears
90-95
2-5m
Pumpkin
10-13
70-75
Spinach
95
Tomatoes
13-21
85-90
1-2w
1w
thermal storage (ice) in order to avoid the only vulnerable component in the system (the battery).
After an intensive field test, SolarChill is now being produced and marketed by Vestfrost, DK.
Night Wind: storage of wind energy in cold stores An EU FP6 research project
operate as coolers, refrigerators, or freezers. They are also available with or without the solar power
system and some models utilize thermal energy storage to reduce or eliminate the need for batteries.
SunDanzer solar refrigerator and freezer models feature 4.67" (12 cm) of polyurethane insulation.
The brushless DC motor compressor operates on 24 or 48VDC. The cost is 25,000-62,500 USD for
a 20ft unit depending on specification (without PV system).
10
11
12
Battery
Rated output
Peak output 5 s
Output voltage
Rated frequency
cos-phi
< 3%
Max. efficiency
> 95%
Fig.8. KACO reCUBE is an example of an off-grid turn-key power supply system with AC output.
In some cases the appliance can be directly driven by renewable energy sources without the use of a
battery bank. This is the case for the power supply the SQFlex pumps from Grundfos. In their
system, a special regulator converts PV and wind power directly to 3 phase AC power fed to the
pump motor. The same idea may be used to run a variable speed compressor for refrigeration
purposes if the market volume is sufficient.
A Danish study2 from 1999 has investigated the symbiosis between wind power and PV for a
hybrid energy system with battery storage. The analysis showed that for Danish conditions the
optimum distribution between wind power and PV was 1:1 (1 m2 PV modules to 1 m2 swept area of
the turbine).
PV & Wind Hybrid System, Lars Yde, Folkecenter for Renewable Energy, 1999
13
14
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Clearness index
0,651
0,705
0,676
0,669
0,637
0,575
0,524
0,518
0,554
0,655
0,651
0,619
Figure 10 shows the most economic system solution as a function of average wind speed and the
daily insolation.
15
16
17
Figure 14
In this figure we can see power shared between a combination of PV and wind hybrid system. Here
the PV system only contributes 40% of the power production versus 60% from wind turbines. The
system is not quite optimal because there is a large untapped energy quantity of 45%. This is partly
due to the chosen big turbine, and that wind energy is fluctuating more than solar energy over the
years. This can be addressed by using multiple batteries, but it will increase the purchase price.
18
5.1.
7.7 kr / kWh
6.7 kr / kWh
8.1 kr / kWh
Summary of simulations
Taking uncertainty about component costs into consideration, it appears that many areas of the 3rd
World will benefit most by choosing a strictly solar based system, when the alternative is very small
and expensive mills. The pure wind solution may be the cheapest option for Cape Verde, but here
are also quite exceptional wind conditions. Opting out of the wind also offers lower maintenance
costs. Only by larger wind power systems this option will be superior, provided that there is a
reasonable wind speed. This also corresponds to Grundfos' experiences with their solar / wind
powered pumps. The solar systems are by far the most widely used system type, and the hybrid
system is used only when there is good wind present.
The exercise of designing an energy supply system has proven Homer to be a useful tool, but there
are many assumptions and price data to be assessed in each case. The result depends (as always) on
the input from the user.
On the basis of this simulation exercise, it is decided that the cooling system will initially be
equipped with a pure PV system, the decision being stimulated by the recently falling prices of PV
modules (2009).
Final report December 2010
19
6.1.
With intermittent energy supply from sun and perhaps also wind, it is a prerequisite for stable
temperature that some kind of energy storage is implied, either:
A. Thermal storage system
1. Ice-slurry or cold liquid in separate tank(s)
2. Integrated ice storage
3. Solid matter storage, e.g. rock, concrete or pebble bed
or
B. Battery storage system
1. DC battery bank
2. AC battery bank (Battery with bi-directional converter)
The storage compartment temperature is generally influenced by:
- Ambient temperature
- Irradiance on the building
- Wind induced convection
- Power availability
- Goods in/out
- Thermal capacity
- Secondary energy storage (batteries)
- Thermostatic control
Some of these parameters can be controlled, others not. For optimum control, the energy storage
must cover demand in the number of days, where no power can be foreseen.
20
In SolarChill A (vaccine cooler), the temperature was only controlled by thermal design of the ice
storage together with a minimum thermostat to prevent sub zero temperatures. In the ILK design, a
tank with ice slurry was used as main energy storage, so that the cold could be released in a
controlled fashion.
Energy storage in batteries alone is a possibility, but is likely the most costly and vulnerable
solution. No examples of cold stores with long term battery supply have been found.
6.2.
Compressor options
Given that the cooling system should be made from widely available refrigeration components
based on the compression principle, there are different possibilities for compressor selection:
- small scale hermetically sealed DC or AC compressors
- larger AC compressors
- combination, for example DC compressor on solar power, AC compressor on wind power
The BD35 compressor from the SolarChill project has a special control for soft start, and gradual
increase of the speed as a function of available power. The experience has been good with direct
connection to PV modules, though some optimization is still possible.
If a battery is used, any DC compressor with good efficiency may be used, because start current is
then no longer a big issue.
AC compressors are cheaper and found in many sizes, so with an inverter based power supply such
compressors could be used as in a grid connected cold storage.
In general, compressors with variable speed are preferable due to increase of system efficiency
while the number of daily start/stop sequences is reduced. Compressors driven by permanent
magnet motors are the most efficient, but also the most expensive.
6.3.
Configuration structure
Apart from the compressor and refrigeration system, it is important to take a closer look at the type
of enclosure for the refrigerated volume itself. In the original project application, it has been
assumed that the best option was a container or small building, with a central refrigeration system.
However, the flexibility and low cost of standard freezer and refrigerator cabinets may open up the
possibility of using clusters of such devices as an alternative solution.
Structural options:
- Isolated container with one or more refrigeration systems (split units)
- Container as sunshield for installed cluster of refrigerators
One could argue that the latter solution is close to products which are already on the market, such as
individual PV refrigerators. However, a cluster of refrigerators at one site could have many
advantages such as better protection against weather, theft and vandalism, as well as the larger
capacity and flexibility in terms of differentiated storage temperatures and utilisation of the units.
The thermal loss associated with openings will also be less for chest type cabinets than for a
container with a door, because the cool and heavy air mainly remain inside the cabinet.
With an intelligent power management system, the goods with the highest value could be stored in a
refrigeration unit with high power priority, while bottled drinks and other uncritical items could be
stored in other low priority units. In the following section some of the advantages and disadvantages
of the possible solutions will be presented.
Final report December 2010
21
Condensor &
compressor
Ice-storage
with
evaporator
Stored goods
Heat exc
Fig 16
In this case the cold storage uses a well-insulated central ice bank for thermal energy storage.
Heat exchange from the storage to the stored goods may be based on air or liquid loops with
forced or natural convection.
Pros
Energy efficient
Accurate temperature control
Cons
Specialized solution
May be expensive for small system sizes
22
Container
Ice-lined
refrigerators
Ice-lined
refrigerators
Fig 17
A container with natural ventilation of excess heat and PV roof is used for protection against direct
sunlight. The refrigerators could for example be of the type with ice-lining of the walls, which
would provide good thermal capacity. These are normally used in regions with unstable power
supply. Alternatively one could partly fill up a standard chest freezer with ice packs.
Pros
Simple solution
Standard components
Individual compartments (ownership)
Possibility for combined
refrigeration/freezing
Less infiltration of air in chest type cabinets
when compared to vertical door
Cons
Less efficient than large cold store per net volume
Larger temperature fluctuations due to large
refrigerator surface area
Less effective volume
23
Condensor &
compressor
Fan cooler
Stored goods
Fig 18
This type uses a heavy construction as sensible heat storage (thermal mass). The building could be
made of concrete or thick (mud)brick walls with good external insulation. Additional mass could be
added if necessary, for example in the form of water tanks.
Pros
Simple solution
Standard components
Cheap, local materials can be used
Cons
Less temperature control
More mass required than for ice storage
24
Cons
Special DC loads or inverter required
Pros
Uses AC standard components
Easy to expand via the AC bus
Multiple generator options
Cons
Specialized system, only few suppliers
Only suitable in larger systems
25
The daily transfer of goods is the single most important design parameter, for example the
difference between the same volume of milk and lettuce results in at least a factor of 10 in
compressor average power.
Most compressors require a considerable start current, and a standalone system will therefore need a
battery or a capacitor to be able to start on PV power alone. However, there are small DC
compressors available with a very low start current, like Danfoss BD35. The main advantage is that
a vulnerable storage battery can be avoided. On the other hand, a battery is needed to keep the
voltage stable if the power is also used for lighting, control and display functions.
For cooling systems of considerable size, there are no large capacity compressors with low starting
current available on the market. It is therefore necessary to use a storage battery, or split up the
system into a cluster of smaller compressors each featuring a low starting current.
The size of the storage battery is determined by the need for continuous operation of the
compressor(s) and by the effective capacity of the thermal storage system. If a small battery is used,
the compressor will have to be bigger, so that it can work on full power during daytime. At night,
the battery will be exhausted, and the ice storage will absorb heat.
If a larger battery is used, the compressor will only have to deliver a smaller cooling capacity in
continuous operation. Some amount of ice storage may still be needed to rapidly cool the goods
when they are loaded.
Since a given energy storage capacity is much cheaper for ice than for battery storage, it is
recommended to minimize the battery to some hours of full load operation. The cooling circuit and
compressors must therefore be oversized relative to the average cooling needs. However, there is a
risk of mismatch between the PV array and the battery, meaning that the battery may run full on
sunny days, unless the compressors can absorb all the power while building up the ice volume.
Two example cases based on this strategy have been calculated as part of the project:
26
The system operation will depend of the state of charge (SOC) of the battery in order to maximize
the utilization of energy:
Low temperature disconnect: When the ice has been almost fully built up, the compressors are
disconnected in order to avoid freeze damages.
Instead of two compressors, one large compressor may be used, if efficient operation can be
obtained at part load by variable speed control.
If there is insufficient sunshine, other power sources can be connected to the battery, e.g. generator
or wind turbine.
In grid connection mode, the design could be modified so that the battery and one compressor are
removed from the system.
Critical parameters for the cooling rate are first of all the initial temperature of the milk, the load
pattern, and the heat transfer ratio from the evaporator, through the ice-lining, and to the milk
container.
An hour by hour simulation in Excel has been made for different setting of these parameters.
27
Batch cooling
35
Temperature
30
25
20
15
Ice storage
10
Milk
5
0
0
4
Hours
Fig 19
Using a realistic total heat transfer rate of about 400 W/m2K for the milk side (with agitation), and a
heat transfer rate of 200 W/m2K for the ice container side, it takes 2 hours to cool down a batch of
150 litres from 29 to 4C. A heat transfer area of 1 m2 was used in this example.
Ice storage
Regulators
MPPT charge controller for optimum PV yield. Variable speed DC/AC motor drive.
Options:
Pre-cooling/night cooling of goods
Traditional refrigerators in cool building
28
7. Design of prototype
For many reasons, it has been decided to work with the standard chest-type refrigerator option.
Such units are relatively cheap, can be manufactured by many different producers, and are wellknown and easy to operate for the end user. The only severe drawbacks are the limited storage
volume and the relatively poor energy performance. These problems must therefore be dealt with.
Volume: The largest domestic freezer cabinets are about 400 liters, and can accommodate relatively
large quantities of goods. More units can be added and run in parallel operation. If there is no
requirement for the full volume, some of the units can be switched off, and thus leave more power
for the rest.
Energy consumption: As opposed to a walk-in cold store, the surface to volume ratio is poor for the
individual refrigerators, and the heat flux is thus higher. On the other hand, the cold air will tend to
stay inside a chest cabinet when the lid is opened. For the container, the cold air will try to escape
each time the door is opened. It is not evident which effect is the most important.
It is important to eject waste heat from the common enclosure when the compressors are in
operation, in order to decrease the ambient temperature around the cabinets as much as possible.
During night time (without operation) it would be better if the container is kept tight, so the heat
flux from the surroundings can be minimized.
Possible solutions:
Use refrigerators with external condenser connected to an exhaust duct. The cabinets are
stowed closely together for minimization of the effective surface area.
Build an external and ventilated enclosure for the cabinets with exhaust to the outside. A fan
is set to operate in parallel with the compressors. When all compressors are off, the air
around the cabinets will stay still, thus providing some additional insulation.
29
Cabinet
Cabinet
Fig20. Container with integrated chimney and cabinet enclosure. Pre-cooled air is taken from a
buried duct. Outer enclosure reduces temperature around the cabinets.
The temperature and heat transport for a container with four chest freezers inside has been
calculated. The heat flux to the freeze volume can be reduced during stand-still periods (night) if the
outer enclosure could also help keep the cabinets cool. It is assumed that the freezers are -18 C
inside, and that the outside air temperature is 35C. The insulation (U-value) of the container is then
varied from 0.2-10 W/m2K, and the corresponding heat flux calculated:
Dimension
Length
Width
Height
Number
Fridge
Container
1,5
0,7
0,8
4
4 m
2 m
2 m
1
Total volume
3,36
16 m3
Total surface
22,48
40 m2
Surface/volume
6,69
2,5
Fig 21
Final report December 2010
30
It can be seen that the insulation value of the container has to be rather good in order to have a
significant effect on the overall heat transfer from outside (35 degC) to the frost zone (-18 degC).
The thickness should be at least 10 cm for conventional insulation materials; a thin layer of
insulation has almost no effect at all.
With a well-insulated container it is possible to maintain a temperate climate that may be suitable
for storage of vegetables or fruit. In this example, the power required for freezing new goods are not
included, it is only reflecting the heat transfer losses.
Some possible cabinets for a prototype system have been identified and listed in Annex 3. The
listed energy consumption of comparable models are:
Whirlpool
419 liter
Elcold 51 XLE
418 liter
0,81 kWh/d
441 liter
213 liter
n.a.
31
15
Transmission losses
10
5
0
1
Fig. 22. Cooling demand for a 16 m3 container(2) and 8 m3 distributed chest freezers(1) for an
example with 50 kg ice load/day and 20 door openings. It is assumed that the effective capacity of
the container is 8 m3, because some of the volume is reserved for walk space and installations.
Delta T is -18/35 C in the example, and wall U value 0,3 W/m2K.
The bar graph shows that the transmission losses are dominant in this case, but other cases could be
constructed with more or less input load. It is however clear that the argument on less air infiltration
load for the chest cabinets should not be exaggerated. From an energy point of view, the two
solutions are equally good.
32
230 V AC cabinet #1
80 V PV
array 800
Wp
230 V AC cabinet #2
plc
DC/DC
DC/AC
24 V DC
cabinet #3
24 V battery
200 Ah lead-acid
(optional)
A fridge that takes only 0.1 kWh a day? Tom Chalko,Renew (Australia) issue 90 (2005)
33
Fig 24. Cabinets in the test lab and thermal storage in the freezer.
System components:
PV array: 800 Wp polycrystalline modules, 2x4 in series, system voltage approx. 80 V
Charge controller: Outback FLEXmax 60 A with MPP tracking
Inverter: Victron Atlas 24/2000 (2 kVA)with automatic sleep mode and low voltage cut-off
Battery: Vision 6FM200D-X12V 2x12 V sealed lead acid AGM batteries in series, nominal
capacity 200Ah(10h).
Cabinet#1: Frigor low energy freezer (prototype)
Cabinet#2: Elcold 31XLE low energy household freezer (run as refrigerator)
Cabinet#3: Vestfrost icelined refrigerator (DC)
Controller: Mitsubishi Alpha 2 application controller with pt100 inputs and relay outputs
34
Fig. 25. PV array with 2 x 4 modules in series and MPP charge regulator
System control
All three cabinets are controlled with a simple PLC controller (Mitsubishi Alpha2), and the
temperature range can be shifted from freezing to cooling mode if desired for the AC cabinets. If
the battery voltage becomes critically low the PLC will switch off the appliances one by one until
the battery is recovered. It has been verified by Elcold that this type of switching does not harm the
appliances, as long as it does not result in very short runtimes, where the compressor oil does not
have time to distribute on contact surfaces.
Fig 26. System controller (24V supply) and charge regulator. Screen dump of Mitsubishi block
oriented control software
Storage capacity
The energy storage is divided in battery storage and a thermal storage consisting of 15 kg icepacks.
The usable storage capacity is calculated as follows:
The 24V battery with 200Ah nominal capacity has a useful capacity of 24h*200Ah*0,5/1000 = 2,4
kWh where 50% depth of discharge is assumed to give a good balance between lifetime and
investment cost. The battery is necessary for voltage stabilization at the inverter input, but in
principle it could be much smaller and substituted by thermal storage volume. In practice it was not
possible, because it should be able to absorb the full PV array current.
Final report December 2010
35
Latent heat in cabinet#1 (15 kg of water) is 15kg*335 kJ/kg /3600s/h = 1,4 kWh. Sensible heat
between -18 and 0C gives another 15kg*2,1kJ/kgK*18K/3600s/h = 0,16 kWh. In refrigerator #3
there is a similar capacity, whereas there is almost no fixed thermal capacity in cabinet#2.
The total storage capacity corresponds to a few days of operation.
Fig. 27. Battery pack with two AGM sealed lead-acid batteries
36
Test schedule
Cabinet
Cooling
Iceliner: 17.6 kg
Cooling
Iceliner:17.6 kg
-
Ice packs
Goods
cool
freeze
good
Ice packs
37
Fig. 29. The graph shows that the warm baskets are cooled down within 24 hours to deep-freeze
temperature. When there is no load of new baskets, the temperature is even and constant around 19C. The double peaks in the basket temperature are almost certainly caused by sub-cooling of
some or all of the icepacks.
Fig. 30. Detail of the refrigerator running in standby mode, but with a high hysteresis of 5 K. The
controller was set to a hysteresis of only 2 K, so it is not evident why it is higher. However, the
basket temperature is quite constant due to the thermal mass. Runtime is about 10% of the time.
38
Fig. 31. Solar irradiance for the measurement period was sufficient to run the system. A sensor
voltage of 0.127 V corresponds to 1000 W/m2.
Performance Ratio
0,9
0,8
0,7
0,6
0,5
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0
0,5
1,5
2,5
3,5
4,5
Fig. 32. The power supply system was verified by calculation of the performance ratio, i.e. the ratio
between the nominal power output of the PV array and the power being charged on the battery. It
can be seen that the performance ratio decreases with daily irradiation, which should also be
expected because the battery runs full on sunny days. In average a value of 0,56 was found for PR,
quite typical for a standalone PV system.
39
Fig. 33. The first three days of the test is a stabilization phase, where the icepacks are cooled and
frozen, respectively. From the 18th the icepacks are loaded every afternoon, and frozen until next
day. The double peaks in the basket temperature are almost certainly caused by sub-cooling of some
or all of the icepacks. It looks like the basket temperature does not reach full freezing to -18C, but
all icepacks were fully frozen when unloaded. The quite low temperature of the new icepacks (when
loading) is likely because the cold air in the cabinet cools down the sensor in the basket
immediately after loading. Though the basket temperature cycles a lot, the fixed thermal storage and
inside air temperature remains almost constant, unless power is insufficient as it was the case during
the last cloudy days.
Fig. 34. The refrigerator thermostat was set to operate between 3 and 5C, but occasionally the air
temperature (shelve) becomes sub-zero. This happens when frozen icepacks from the freezer are
loaded together with warm icepacks, but only until the temperature is leveled between the two
40
baskets. The reason for temperature fluctuations may also be caused by the lack of a fixed thermal
mass in this cabinet. The warm basket is cooled down quite fast due to this temperature
equalization, and the warm packs never freezes. During the last two days, where power was cut off
some of the time, the passive heat transfer from the warm to the cold icepacks is evident, because
the cabinet temperature is warmer than the icepacks.
Fig. 35. The graph above shows in detail how the thermostat starts regulation already from 0C
after the frozen packs have been loaded together with warm packs. The on / off time distribution is
about 20/80%. A better thermostat sensor position could have improved the regulation pattern.
Fig. 36. Solar irradiance was variable and quite representative for a Danish autumn week. Due to
low solar energy levels on the 23rd and 24th, it can be seen that the battery voltage becomes low the
last days of the test. This means that the inverter has cut off some of the time, and there has
therefore been a rise in cabinet temperatures.
41
Battery voltage
28
27,5
27
26,5
26
25,5
25
0
10
12
2,5
2
1,5
kWh to battery
0,5
0
0
10
12
Fig. 37. Battery cycling. Nominal battery capacity = 200 Ah *24 V = 4,8 kWh. The graph shows
that the battery is undergoing a daily 20-25% cycle of state of charge (SOC) which is acceptable for
a deep cycle lead-acid battery. On the sunniest days the charge is about 2 kWh, of which 80-85%
will be available the next day at the inverter output terminals.
Energy consumption
kWh AC
1,5
1
15C
25C
0,5
35C
0
0
4
6
8
kg/day freeze-in
10
12
Fig. 38. The electricity supply to the two AC powered cabinets was measured with an ordinary
electricity meter, and correlated with the daily exchange of icepacks in the freezer. The
measurements are corrected to three different ambient temperatures. If an average COP of 1.4 is
used, the measurements are corresponding with the theoretical energy demand for cooling and
freezing of the icepacks. The relatively low consumption is reached by a good thermal insulation
Final report December 2010
42
and the fact that the cold air exchange is very limited when the lid is opened due to the higher
gravity of cold air.
For a typical application in developing countries, the ambient temperature would be 35C and there
would be approximately 1.6 kWh of electrical energy available after a sunny day. Under these
boundary conditions it can be calculated that the freezing capacity is about 8 kg/day for the
experimental system.
If the frozen icepacks are transferred to the refrigerator and thawed before taking them out of the
system, the energy consumption is almost halved or the capacity doubled.
43
230 V AC cabinet #1
24 V PV
array 800
Wp
230 V AC cabinet #2
plc
DC/AC
+ REG
24 V battery
200 Ah lead-acid
44
9.1
Spin-off projects
As part of this quite extensive project, there have been a number of contacts with associated
activities as well as direct requests from companies operating in 3 rd world countries. The two most
important cases have been a milk-cooling project in Uganda and a World Bank GEF project
regarding improved storage methods for vaccines.
Milk has a relatively high sales value and a very limited storage time if it is not cooled effectively
after milking. In many developing countries there is a high loss percentage, or the milk is simply
not being produced and distributed to meet the real demand that could be fulfilled with proper
cooling and transport. It can also be the case that a central diary collects the milk at a very low
price, because they know the farmers do not have possibility to store and sell the milk at the local
market as they lack cooling facilities. If the farmers could score this profit, they could invest in
development in their local area.
The current design of the PV driven refrigeration system could be modified to milk cooling, and
this is actually being investigated by the Danish company Karise Klejnsmedie who are specialist
in stainless steel processing. They are currently designing a prototype with a cooling capacity of 75
liters/day for test at DTI. If the test results are promising, it is the intention to build a version for
field test. It is a challenge that the power consumption for cooling of 75 l milk is quite high, and the
desired cooling rate of 30C in two hours is much higher than a small compressor can cope with. It
is therefore suggested to integrate a big volume of ice around the milk containers as a buffer. The
PV array will also be bigger than the current prototype, but as the cost of PV has decreased to a
favourable level, it is not an obstacle in itself.
45
9.2
Perspectives
Solar powered refrigeration and freezing has drawn attention for decades, and numerous systems
have been developed with either thermal or electric energy input. However, the commercial success
stories have been scarce. With recent 30-40% lower cost on PV modules, it seems likely that
electric system will have advantage over thermally driven systems in general terms.
The current PV based project has deviated somewhat from its original intentions, but nevertheless
some important lessons have been learnt and useful results achieved.
First of all, the result shows that a very efficient and flexible refrigeration system can be constructed
at reasonable costs from commercially available standard components. The only draw-back of the
design is the battery that has a limited lifetime, so the system is not truly maintenance-free. On the
other hand, lead-acid batteries are available everywhere in the world at reasonable costs. In a future
system it might be possible to reduce the size of the battery further, and increase the thermal storage
capacity instead.
The system has been operating without any problems, apart from temporary cut-off during very
cloudy periods. In such periods, the controller can give priority to keep the most important cabinet
in operation on the expense of less important units.
Future application of a flexible refrigerator/freezer cluster driven by PV power is first of all in nongrid connected areas with reasonably constant daily solar irradiance, i.e. the Sunbelt, where there is
a real demand for storage of perishable goods. Typically it could be fish, meat, milk, certain
vegetables, cold drinks and ice cream. The profitability will be highest if the goods have a high
commercial value per volume and heat capacity unit.
Apart from commercial use, the system will also be very suitable for larger health centres with a
need for vaccine storage and freezing of icepacks. A version for this purpose is currently being
developed by DTI.
Finally, larger clusters of PV powered cabinets could be constructed on a community basis, where
each owner could have a small compartment on a rental basis. The system should be financed by an
investor who could earn a profit and take care of maintenance and protection. These systems could
be combined with street lighting and other services such as cell phone charging. For even larger
cold stores, it is possibly necessary to develop other configurations based on isolated containers or
buildings. In this case thermally driven solar refrigeration circuits could become an economic
option.
46
Photo: Test of SolarChill B in climate chamber at DTI. The cooler is powered by power supply (15
V) and power is available 10 hours a day. Temperatures are measured and recorded (8
temperatures inside the cooler and ambient temperature and humidity)
47
Photo: The prototype has 5 baskets (3 baskets in the upper part and 2 baskets in the bottom). The
volume is 137 litres and the cooler can contain a great amount of food and/or a greater number of
soft drink cans (see photo). The cooler is intended to be used for household use or small
commercial use.
At this photo it can be can seen, that the cooler is packed with 2,5 kg test packages (also used in the
European test standards for household refrigerators) in each basket and 8 soft drink cans (33 ml) in
each basket. This simulates food and drinks. This is a test method developed at DTI this springtime.
Tests have been made in a climate chamber at DTI, where also other tests are ongoing. The
temperature in the climate chamber is defined by other tests, and the temperature has been 22 C in a
period and is now 30 C and will stay at 30 C for a while.
Results at 22 C ambient temperature
The very first tests where used to find correct placement of the thermostat sensor in the upper part
of the cooler.
When this was found, stable running and hold-over time test were made.
48
Curve: Test at 22 C ambient temperature. During stable running the compressor and refrigeration
system is running about 3 hours and 40 minutes per day. The temperatures in testpackages are
between 0 and + 3 C and the air temperatures are between 1 and + 3.5 C. The hold over time is
about 2.5 days (food temperature has rised to + 7 C, air temperature to + 8 C) and after 3 days the
temperature has rised to + 10 C.
49
Curve: Test at 30 C ambient temperature. During stable running the running time is about 6 hours,
20 minutes per day. The temperature in test packages are between 1.5 and + 2.5 C and the
temperature in air are between -2 and + 3.0 C. The hold-over time is about 2.7 days (food is
warmed up to + 7 C) and after a little more than 3 days the testpackages are warmed up to + 10 C.
It can be seen from the curves that the ice has melted after about 2.5 days.
The DTI has the opinion, that these results are very good. Both at +22 and + 30 C ambient we have
surplus of cooling capacity, temperatures from -1.5 to + 3 C. By modifying the thermostat setting
this might be a little warmer, if this is wanted. The hold-over time is about 2.5 3 days, which also
is good.
The cooler is intended for household and small commercial use, where the claims for temperature
setting is not that big. It does not matter if the temperature is -1.5 or + 3 C. The coldest temperature
is at the bottom of the cooler and the warmer is in the upper baskets, and if wanted this can be
beneficial eg. by storing food in the bottom and drinks in the upper baskets.
50
Curve: Tempertures inside the SolarChill-B cooler during the half reload test. It can be seen that
the warm soft drink cans are quite rapidly cooled down, and after about 8 hours the warmest can is
below 7 0C.
It can be seen from the curve above that the warm cans are rapidly cooled down. It takes 8 hours for
the warmest cans to be cooled down to +7 0C.
51
Curve: Half reload test with temperatures and the effect used by the power supply. It can be seen
that the compressor is running almost all the time when power is available (10 hours a day) when
the half reload test is ungoing. This reflects that we are close to the maximum cooling capacity by
this test. The average temperature in the cooler is quite low (about + 2 0C).
The conclusion on the half reload test is, that the cooler works fine and can each day cool at least
20 soft drink cans (equal to 6,7 kg water) down from 30 0C to below + 5 C.
52
2) FP5 Project Record 528 . Development of a mobile solar-driven refrigerated container for rural
areas
General Project Information
FP5 Programme Acronym: EESD
Project Reference: ENK6-CT-2000-35010 Contract Type: Exploratory awards
Start Date: 2000-07-06 End Date: 2001-07-05
Duration: 12 months Project Status: Completed
Update Date: 2005-05-03
Project Description
In countries with a high level of sunshine there is a considerable demand for cold supply. Statistics have
shown that in sough Europe nearly 10% of fresh food become worse in quality due to the lack of sufficient
refrigeration. This concerns in particular structurally weak rural areas in Southern Europe (Greece, Spain,
53
Portugal, etc.) which represent about 2/3 of the total territory in these regions. The main problems in these
thinly populated areas are often the logistics and the lack of infrastructure. Against this background there is a
major demand for new and innovative solutions for decentralised and combined cooling processes. Solar
refrigeration plants are ideal for keeping foodstuffs fresh, since the solar radiation which "causes" the need
for refrigeration is available in sufficient quantities. The COOLTAINER proposed here can be used for
different applications such, for examples the storage of fresh fish, meat and vegetables and also of medicine.
Prior to the project, the possibility of application on a large scale was tested by means of some basic systemrelated laboratory trials and the results were positive. The objective is to develop further and optimise the
COOLTAINER in the framework of a research project so that upon complete
Coordinator
Organisation Type: Other
Organisation: CRYCLE CRYOGENIC DEVELOPMENT N.V.
PO Box 4056
2003 EB HAARLEM
NETHERLANDS
Contact Person:
Name: VAN BAKKUM, Theo
Participants
Organisation: COOLINGTEC INDUSTRIES (1993) LTD.
Ramat Hashron
47264 RAMAT HA-SHARON
ISRAEL
Contact Person: ARTSIELY, Yehuda
3) Vapour Compression Cooling System Powered By Solar PV Array for Potato Storage
Mohamed A. Eltawil1 and D.V.K. Samuel2
1Agril. Engineering Division, Faculty of Agric., Box 33516, Kafr El-Sheikh Univ.,
Egypt, email: [email protected]
2 Post Harvest Technology Division, IARI, New Delhi-110012, India.
ABSTRACT
Refrigerated storage, which is believed to be best method for storing the fruits and vegetables in
fresh form, is not available in rural or remote locations where grid electricity is almost not
available. So, without having a conventional energy source at these areas, the present study was
taken up to design and fabricate a solar PV powered vapour compression refrigeration system to
attain favourable conditions for potato storage, and to evaluate its shelf life under different
operating conditions. The system is designed and fabricated in the division of Agril. Engineering
at IARI, New Delhi. It consisted of PV panel, lead-acid battery, inverter and the vapour
compression refrigeration system consists of a drier-cum-filter besides the main components:
compressor, condenser, expansion device, evaporator, exhaust and evaporator fans. The 2.50 m3
cold storage structure was constructed and insulated with proper materials. An evaporatively
cooled storage structure (1.0 m3) was used for curing process. The cured potato cultivar (Kufri
Chandermukhi) were stored for 5 months. The stored tubers were divided into two lots, one used
as control (free sprouting) and the second was manually desprouted. Measuring of moisture loss,
dry matter, sprouting, rotting, sugars content, starch and chipping quality reflected the shelf life
54
of potato. The average daily solar photovoltaic (SPV) energy output and energy consumption by
the load were 5.65 and 4.115 kWh, respectively, under full load. The obtained results indicated
that, the average daily actual COP for loaded and air circulated cold storage structure was 3.25.
The average temperature and relative humidity maintained inside the loaded and air circulated
storage structure were 283.13 K and 86 %, respectively. Solar panel can serve as an alternative
source of energy for powering cooling system.
Keywords: Solar photovoltaic, cold storage, potato, curing.
55
56
Picture: ILK Container system for cold storage of perishable goods and foodstuffs
basic unit: 20 ft container
PV generator: 3.4 kWp
cooling power: 5.1 kW (-5C/45C)
cold storage room temperature: 0C to 10C (fan controlled)
3
cold storage room capacity: 23 m
special features: cold storage for 3 days, redundant design of cooling system and energy supply
According to recent communication with ILK, status of the ILK project is that the commercial production
has not yet been realized, only a number of demonstration units.
Contact information:
Jrg Waschull, PhD
Department of Applied New Technologies
57
58
59
60
Vestfrost
The Vestfrost SOE -215 cabinet is a highly insulated cabinet (100 mm PU-foam) equipped with a
Danfoss BD-compressor for 12V or 24 V. The net volume is 213 litres and the dimensions are
1125*600*850 mm (L*D*H).
Two options are available: refrigerator (0 - + 10 C) and freezer (-10 - -18 C).
The existing coolers are likely equipped with HFC-refrigeration system (R134a), but would
possible be modified to natural refrigerant (R600a).
Elcold XLE
Rated A+ Energy efficient, the XLE range of super low energy chest freezers will help to lower
running costs. Features include temperature warning light, defrost drain and fitted lock. Made by
Elcold.
Features and Benefits
Technical Specifications
100mm Insulation
A+ Energy Rating
Refrigerant: R134A
Defrost Drain
Lock
Adjustable Temperature
Internal Light
61
62
The need for environmentally friendly and affordable solar vaccine coolers and refrigerators was
realized in 1998-2000 through separate discussions between the United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP), World Health Organization (WHO) and Greenpeace International (GPI).
At about the same time, Danish Technological Institute (DTI) independently began the development
of a new solar refrigerator that bypassed the use of batteries (funded by the Danish Energy Agency).
DTI worked together with the Danish refrigerator manufacturer Vestfrost. The direct current
hydrocarbon compressor was developed by the Danfoss Company.
The first meeting of the SolarChill Project Partners was hosted by GTZ Proklima in Eschborn, Germany, on 5 May 2001. With an initial decision to proceed with the project, Greenpeace
International provided the funds for the development of the first SolarChill prototypes. These were
exhibited at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in the fall of 2002 in Johannesburg,
South Africa.
A second generation of SolarChill Vaccine Cooler prototype was field tested at the beginning of
2004 in Senegal, Indonesia and Cuba. 10 prototypes of the chest vaccine cooler were tested under a
variety of climatic conditions, 3 units in each of the countries mentioned, and 1 unit at the DTI
laboratory in Denmark. The field tests were coordinated by DTI, and overseen in Senegal and
Indonesia by PATH, and in Cuba by GTZ. The governments and Ministries of Health of the host
countries were active participants in the field tests.
Following the experience from the field tests and the implementation of new standards from WHO
(PQS, Performance Quality Safety) specifying required vaccine storage temperatures, a third
generation of Solar Vaccine Cooler prototype was tested and the unit was marketed. Prototypes of
SolarChill B for domestic and small commercial businesses were developed and tested with help
from GTZ and the Danish Energy Agency. In 2009, the World Bank joined the SolarChill
partnership. SolarChill technology is free of charge and accessible to everyone. With substantial
funding from the Global Environment Facility, SolarChill Project will conduct, with the SolarChillA, extensive demonstration and technology transfer projects in Colombia and Kenya. In addition,
the project plans to complete the development, field testing and commercialization of the
SolarChill-B refrigerators.
More details about the partnership can be found in Ref. 1.
2. ICE STORAGE VERSUS BATTERIES
It has been a wish from the relief organizations to avoid lead batteries as the main source of energy
to keep the vaccine coolers cold during night-time and during periods with minor solar power.
Previous experience has shown that additional costs are related to the batteries because frequent decharging results in a fast degradation of the batteries. That is one reason why the solar powered
coolers have been more expensive compared to kerosene or LPG-powered absorption refrigerators.
In the SolarChill project, ice batteries have been developed as an alternative source for energy
storage, and the SolarChill refrigerators use ice batteries in different versions. In the following, a
comparison is carried out between the energy storage in a typical lead battery and in ice:
One major supplier of batteries informs the following about its 12 V, 50 Ah batteries:
Dimensions: 0.175*0.190*0.221 = 0.00734 m3
63
Weight: 13.6 kg
Energy storage: 2,160,000 J and the specific energy storage is 0.159 MJ/kg or 294 MJ/m3.
If we assume a COP value of 1.49 of the refrigeration system (Danfoss BD35K, - 10 C, 2000 RPM,
CECOMAF-data, Ref. 2) then the specific cooling energy in the battery is 0.23691 MJ/kg or 438
MJ/m3.
The similar figures for ice are 0.333 MJ/kg or 333 MJ/m3.
The conclusion is that the cooling capacity for ice storage is of the same order of magnitude as for a
lead battery on volumetric and mass basis. The cooling capacity is app. 40% higher (for the ice
storage) on weight basis and app. 30% less on volume basis. In this comparison, a 100% discharge
of the battery is assumed, which should not be carried out in reality as that would harm the battery.
Another point that disfavors lead batteries is the risk of lead pollution at the end of the lifetime of
the battery.
Future commercialization of batteries with high energy density for electric vehicles might change
the role of battery storage in solar refrigeration. But so far, the project partners believe that ice
storage in SolarChill is the preferred solution. A disadvantage when using ice storage is that the ice
has to be stored inside the insulation in the cabinet and therefore part of the volume inside the
refrigerator is used.
3. CONCEPT FOR SOLARCHILL
The philosophy behind SolarChill is that the coolers must be as cheap as possible and affordable for
people living in areas without grid electricity.
The SolarChill coolers are based on existing well-insulated cabinets, which are mass produced. The
SolarChill-A vaccine cooler has a small chest cabinet with 100 mm polyurethane insulation (blown
with cyclopentane gas), the SolarChill-B-chest-type is based on an ice-liner refrigerator produced
for other purposes and also with 100 mm insulation and the SolarChill-B-upright prototype is based
on a small well-insulated upright household freezer cabinet with 80 mm insulation.
It is important for the SolarChill partnership to use natural refrigerants and a compressor
manufacturer entered the project as industrial partner and developed a DC compressor for isobutane
refrigerant (R600a). The displacement is 3 cm3. The compressor manufacturer also developed a new
integrated electronic control for the compressor, which ensures that the photovoltaic panels can be
connected directly to the compressor without external control. The electronic control also ensures a
soft start which is important when no battery is used.
The electronic control is equipped with an adaptive speed control (Adaptive Energy optimizer
AEO). By using that control, the compressor will stepwise speed up from low speed to maximum
speed in 12.5 RPM/min. If the photovoltaic panels cannot provide sufficient power, the compressor
will stop and after a short while it will try to start again. The compressor will try to start every
minute and once the power from the panels is sufficient the compressor will start at lower speed.
The first start in the morning is at app. 2500 RPM. After a compressor stop the compressor will
start up at the latest speed minus 400 RPM. The speed range is from 2000 to 3500 RPM.
The controller accepts a voltage between 10 and 45 V. The voltage from photovoltaic panels can
vary and that is a good feature for solar powered refrigerators and freezers. When using 12 V
64
modules, the compressor starting current is less than 3 A. The compressor runs continuously at
about 3 A at low speed (see figure 1). Using normal electronic control the start current would be
much higher, requiring much bigger PV-panels or require the use of a capacitor to help start the
compressor.
The expansion device is a capillary tube with heat exchange to the suction line. In the chest type
cabinets integrated skin condensers are used as in most chest freezers.
The evaporator in the SolarChill-A vaccine cooler is a wire-on-tube-type placed in the ice storage as
shown in figure 2. The evaporator in SolarChill-B chest-type is an integrated skin-type as in most
chest freezers. The evaporator in SolarChill-B-upright-type is a box-type roll bond-aluminum
evaporator as known from old refrigerators with a small freezer compartment. The refrigerant
charge in the SolarChill-A vaccine cooler is 48 grams of R600a and the charge in the SolarChill-Bchest-type is 60 grams. The charge in SolarChill-B-upright is 48 gram.
2 Vaccine compartment
4 Lid
6 Ice storage (26 ice packs, 600 ml)
8 Compressor
Figure 2a: Figure with basic principles for the SolarChill-A vaccine cooler. Figure 2b: Photo of the solar
DC compressor. The integrated solar electronic control is placed at the left-hand side of the compressor.
65
Figure 3a: SolarChill-B upright prototype built in a well-insulated freezer cabinet with 80 mm PUinsulation. Figure 3b: The box-type roll-bond evaporator in the cooler.
66
40C
1200
30C
1000
20C
800
10C
600
0C
400
-10C
200
-20C
Temperature
#. kWh - R.T.
-------------1. 0.31 - 70%
2. 0.33 - 74%
3. 0.32 - 72%
4. 0.33 - 75%
0
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
Figure 4: Lab test of SolarChill upright at 32C ambient temperature. Power is available 8 hours a day, but
the compressor runs less (about 6 hours a day). The temperature inside the compartment is between 2.5 and
7.5C which is good for food storage. Hold-over time is 3.1 days (75 h) defined until the temperature rises to
+10C. The compartment contained 10 kg of test packages.
The ice storage is placed inside the box evaporator and natural convection ensures the temperature
inside the cooler compartment. The shelves have to be open grill type to ensure convection. The
compressor is of the same type as for the SolarChill-A vaccine cooler. So far, no manufacturer has
been found for this type of SolarChill, but discussions are taking place with a potential
manufacturer.
6. SOLARCHILL-B CHEST-TYPE
The development and laboratory test of a chest-type SolarChill-B took place at Danish
Technological Institute in 2009. The cooler is based on an existing cabinet used for other purposes
(ice liners).
Figure 5: SolarChill-B chest-type prototype based on a 160 liter ice liner cabinet. The cooler is equipped
with 5 baskets (3 upper baskets and 2 lower baskets). The photo shows that the cooler is tested with 12.5 kg
test packages and 13.3 kg soft drinks (40 cans) simulating food and drinks.
67
The cabinet has been installed with the solar DC compressor of same type as in SolarChill-A. An
ice bank of about 17.5 kg is placed in the wall between the evaporator and the interior cabinet. The
cooler is controlled by a mechanical thermostat and tests were conducted in the laboratory at DTI.
Figure 6: Test at ambient temperature of 30C. The compressor runs about 6h 40 minutes per day and the
temperature of the test packages is between -1.5 and 2.5C. The air temperature is between -2 and +3 0C
which is relatively cold for a refrigerator. The hold-over time is 2.7 days (up to +7C) and 3 days (up to +
10C).
Figure 7: Half reload test. 20 warm soft drink cans were inserted inside SolarChill-B chest-type when
taking out 20 cold cans. That was done at sunset four days in a row. Power is available 10 hours a day,
temperature is measured in one can in an upper basket and one can in a lower basket and the test shows the
cooling capacity is sufficient to cool 20 cans a day. However, the cooling capacity is limited for this type of
cooler.
68
69
70
Kabinettet kunne mske vre Vestfrost Function SW284C med bruttovolumen p 296 liter eller
mske det professionelle kabinet HF396 med et bruttovolumen p 373 liter ?
Final report December 2010
71
Nedklingsprocessen
Her kommer en beregning af nedklingsprocessen m.m.:
Klekapacitet i nedklingsfasen p max 2 timer:
Der skal nedkles 150 liter mlk fra 29 C til 4 C. Vi regner p vand:
Qcm = (M*DeltaT*Cp)/Delta TID = (150 kg*25K*4186(J/kgK))/(2*3600s) = 2180 W
Det svarer til smeltning af et ismngde p:
Mis = (QCM*DeltaTID)/smeltevarme = (2180W*2*3600s)/335000(J/kg) = 46,85 kg is
Af to grunde vil det vre godt, hvis fordamperrrene ligger et stykke nede i kummen:
Det gr det muligt, at stte sttteskruer p karret (jf. tegning)
Det vil vre godt, hvis isopbygning sker lidt nede i vandreservoiret. Det vil medvirke til god
cirkulation (konvektion) samtidig med, at der er plads til is, som mtte lsrive sig og flyde
overp.
Der vil i vrigt vre luft foroven i reservoiret, og der skal kunne ske passage af luft ind og
ud af reservoiret evt. igennem et trykudligningshul p bagsiden.
Nedklingsprocessen for system A: Kling med direkte solkraft
Ved krsel med kleanlg i 7 timer kan dette genereres med en kleeffekt p:
Qcoolcapacity,SC = 2/7 * 2180 W = 623 W.
Dette kan klares med flgende kompressortyper (propan R290):
Antagelse: to = - 10 C, tc = + 45 C (mske for lavt?)
SC10CNX (lige akkurat !)
SC12CNX
SLV15CNX (variable speed, - kan mske neddrosles til 12 eller 10 cm3)
Det vil nok vre mest naturligt og passende at vlge SC12CNX i frste omgang.
Nedklingsprocessen for system B: Kling med batteridrift
Ved krsel i 20 timer kan man klare det med 2/20 * 2180 W = 280 W kleeffekt.
Det kan klares med en noget mindre og i klembler mere almindelig kompressor.
Det vil mske vre oplagt at benytte NLE15KTK, som Vestfrost i forvejen benytter i flaskeklere
(M200 R600a) og impulsklere (POS72 R600a).
Der findes ogs en Danfoss jvnstrmskompressor, som kan klare det. Det er en BD350GH, som
dog er til R134a.
Hvis det skal vre med naturlige klemidler kan en twin-lsning med BD100CN tnkes.
Konklusion: I frste omgang benyttes en NLE15KTK i den frste prototype. Kapillarrr og intern
varmeveksler fra flaskekler kan mske benyttes.
Varmeovergangsforhold p vand- og mlkesiden
Final report December 2010
72
73
Afgivelse af varme:
Normalt afgives varmen igennem svbskondensatoren i en fryseboks. Vi har her med strre
varmeeffekter at gre; - isr hvis der satses mod af benytte SC12CN-kompressoren og brug af
direkte solkraft.
Batteridrift:
Hvis vi benytter NL15KTK.2 vil den afgivne effekt vre ca. 600 W.
Det kan mske klares med svbskondensator + overhedningsfjerner m. blser ?
Det svarer lidt til en stor iscremefryser.
Direkte solkraft:
Her har vi med strre effekter at gre. Her skal vi af med 1,3 kW, og det er mske ndvendig med
ekstern blokkondensator m. blser.
74
75