The Postmodern
The Postmodern
Principal Concepts
It has been acknowledged in the beginning that the terms and concepts of post modernism
are hard to define. Nevertheless, this part of the paper shall look at the general concepts of the
period, of what, when the term post modern or Po-Mo is mentioned comes to one’s mind. Hassan
(2001) mentions in an encyclical, Pope John Paul II used the word in reference to “extreme
relativism in values and beliefs,” including irony and skepticism in reason, and the denial of
truth. Hassan summarizes in saying that what Po-Mo’s description from various perspectives
have in common are the following: parody, pastiche, play, relativism, fragments, and concepts
akin to these.
One of the principal concepts of post modern is self-reflexivity. While modern thinkers
have done this as well, as in the case of Immanuel Kant’s “What is Enlightenment?” Post
moderns seem to take self-reflexivity into extreme. Theirs is done in a manner more playful than
the moderns. (Felluga, 2003) While reflexivity in the modern could be found in high-art, such
that of Picasso’s painting, post modern reflexivity bridges the gap between “high and low”
cultures. In relation, this removal of gap between the high and low culture is evident in
architecture, for instance when one tries to juxtapose in the same room things that are baroque,
rococo or modern (2003). An additional principal concept of the post modern is deconstruction.
This is often related to the philosopher Jacques Derrida who is largely influenced by the seminal
not aimed in “tearing down,” rather this close reading aims to bring out what the author does not
acquired its Marxist character from the late 1890s through the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917.
Borrowed from Lenin, this hegemony refers to the leadership exercised by the proletariat over
the other exploited classes. (Mastroianni, 2002) Before that, hegemony simply borrows from the
Greek “egemonia,” which means ruler of a state other than one’s own.
moral and intellectual leadership in which the dominated or subordinate classes of post-1870
industrial Western European nations “consent to their own domination by ruling classes, as
opposed to being simply forced or coerced into accepting inferior position.” (Mastroianni, 2002)
While Mastroianni added that Gramsci was careful in sounding Marxist in his writings as these
are reviewed by fascists, this concept of hegemony is itself related to the concept of base and
superstructure, wherein those who hold the tools or machineries necessary for production are
also the same group of people who holds the ideas of an epoch.
This could be demonstrated when one goes back to the five epochs of Marx: the ancient
communalism, primitive slavery, feudalism, capitalism, and finally communism. Those who are
the primitive masters are the same masters not only in economy, but also when it comes to
thinking, arts, culture or philosophy. By leaving the manual work to the slaves, they are free to
think and study. Up to this date, it is still the same for the few capitalists in the world, and those
who hold the mass media tool are the same persons who are capable of choosing which