Stability Analysis For Power Swing Protection: H. Askarian Abyaneh, M. Marjanmehr and M. Meshkin
Stability Analysis For Power Swing Protection: H. Askarian Abyaneh, M. Marjanmehr and M. Meshkin
AX
<= fL <= fLMA The last 5 Computer algorithm
Generat N
N Y As mentioned in section 2, first the line under study
is made full load by tripping of the relevant
Message transmission lines or generators. Then, the
END impedance characteristic curve seen by the relay
under study is obtained . After that if the variation
Figure1: The flowchart of the transmission impedance can arrive in both starter and third zone
maximum load by generation influence. of the distance relay, power swing blocking time
setting (TO) will be the time taken the curve passes
power swing blocking and starter characteristics. It
4 S wing and transmission lines means if the passing time is greater than TO, the
distance relay operation is blocked. If the swing
When a line is selected for power swing protection curve can not arrive in the third protective zone of
study, it is necessary to make it full load. This is
distance relay, the swing has no occurred and power given in sections 2&3, time settings of the relays are
swing blocking unit is not applicable. calculated as follows:
(i) Calculation of the important
6 Test result Generations coefficients for Poonel -
Taghidize and Rasht -Poonel to make
As mentioned in introduction when a fault occurs on them full loads (T able 1).
Rajaee-Tabriz transmission line of Fig. 1, two (ii) Computation of transmission lines
different lines namely Poonel- T aghidize and Rasht- coefficients of Poonel-Taghidize and
Poonel are tripped by power swing relays [1]. Now Rasht -Poonel to recognize the line creating
by using sensitivity coefficients and the approach the most onerous power swing.
shafa
rasht
ahar taghidize poonel ramsar
rasht s hom ali
oroomieh
moghan
azar sikle tarkibi gilan
G
sardrood
sefidrood
miandoab
tabriz
shahid rajaee
Table 1:Generation coefficient for Poonel- Taghidize As can be seen in the above tables some lines
Generation Gilan Shahid Tabriz Power coefficient relative to lines Poonel-Taghidize and
coefficient Power Rajaee Power Station
Station Station Rasht -Poonel are 1. It can be shown that in network
Poonel-Taghidize 0.619 0.592 0.51 Azarbayjan if a fault occurs on a line with the
coefficient 1, the relative power system become
Table 2:Generation coefficient for Rasht-Poonel radial.
Generation Loshan Shahid Tabriz Power For example, if a fault occurs on Poonel- Rasht and
coefficient Power Rajaee Power Station
Station Station this line trips, Poonel-Taghidize becomes radial.
Rasht -Poonel 0.450 0.490 0.51 Therefore no power swing will exist. This is
V
Table 3: Transmission lines coefficients of P oonel- Taghidize because Z = and oscillation of both V&I are
Lines coefficient Poonel - Ahar- Shahid I
Taghidizeh taghidize Rajaee- created by one source, so they are synchronized and
Tabriz the value of Z is constant.
Poonel-Taghidize 1.00 1.00 0.436 Now, to make lines Poonel-Taghidizeand Rasht-
Table 4: Transmission lines coefficients of Rasht-Poonel Poonel full loads According to the above
Lines coefficient Poonel - Rasht- Shahid coefficients, simulation is made such the by outage
Taghidizeh Gilan Rajaee- of one unit of Tabriz power station with (320MW),
Tabriz The loads of the lines becomes larges. After this
Rasht-Poonel 1.00 1.00 0.620
procedure, loads of Poonel-taghidize increases from
82 to 121 MW and Rasht -Poonel from 120 MW to
131 MW. Now by choosing Shahid Ragaiee-Tabriz 1995. Iran Dispatching Report, Tavanir
which has largest coefficient after the two other Company, 1995.
lines and putting a fault on the line. The following [2] W. Cong, Z. Pan, Z. Yun, and R. Zhong, The
process will result. Two distance protection of the method of detecting asynchronous power
relays at buses Tabriz and Shahid-Rajaee tripped in swing based on the variation of active power,
200 and 320 ms (Zones 1 and 2) and power swing Power System Management and Control, IEE
occurred on the lines Rasht-Poonel and Poonel- Conference, April 2002, pp. 297-302
Taghidize. [3] S. Jiao, Zh Bo, W. Liu, and Q. Yang, New
Figures 2 and 3 show the variation impedance principle to detect fault during Power swing,
curves for the relays. The times taken that IEE Development in Power System
impedance curves passes from the blocking zone to Protection, No. 479, pp. 515-518
the starter zone are calculated. These times are time [4] M. Marjanmehr, Power swing protection
setting of blocking units and for the lines Poonel- settings using analysis of power swing of
Taghidize 40ms and Rasht-Poonel 780ms. networks, MSc. Thesis, Amirkabir Univ. of
Tech., Tehran, Iran 1998.
[5] A J. Wood , and Bruce F. W. Berg, Power
generation, operation and control, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993.
[6] M. Noroozian, M. Ghandhari, G. Anderson,
J. Gronquist, and I. Hiskens, A robust control
strategy for shunt and series r eactive
compensators to damp electromechanical
oscillations, IEEE Transactions an Power
Delivery, Vol. 16, No. 4, October 2001.
[7] K.E. Wilson, Power system stability, Vol. 3,
1962.
Figure 3: Simulation of power swing for Poonel- [8] A. Mechraui, and D. W. P. Thomas, A new
Rasht blocking principle with phase and earth fault
detection during fast power swings for
distance protection, IEEE Transactions on
Power Delivery, Vol. 10, No. 3, July 1995.
[9] A new power swing block in distance
protection based on a microcomputer-
principle and performance analysis, IEE, ,
Vol. 2, pp. 843-7, 1992.
[10] C. L. Cha ng, Steady-s tate s ecurity control
using a s ensitivity based approach , Electrical
Power System Research, 1990.
9 Biographies
8 Refrences