0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views

Basic Concepts in RF Design: ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)

This document discusses basic concepts in RF design including: 1. It defines linear and nonlinear systems, time invariant and variant systems, and differential or balanced systems. 2. It describes concepts such as gain compression, harmonics generation, desensitization, blocking, cross modulation, and intermodulation in nonlinear systems. 3. It defines terms such as 1-dB compression point, third order intercept point (IP3), input third order intercept point (IIP3), and output third order intercept point (OIP3) that are used to characterize the performance of RF circuits.

Uploaded by

a_p_k
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views

Basic Concepts in RF Design: ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)

This document discusses basic concepts in RF design including: 1. It defines linear and nonlinear systems, time invariant and variant systems, and differential or balanced systems. 2. It describes concepts such as gain compression, harmonics generation, desensitization, blocking, cross modulation, and intermodulation in nonlinear systems. 3. It defines terms such as 1-dB compression point, third order intercept point (IP3), input third order intercept point (IIP3), and output third order intercept point (OIP3) that are used to characterize the performance of RF circuits.

Uploaded by

a_p_k
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Basic Concepts in RF Design

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Nonlinear systems
• Linear system • Example
– output can be expressed as a linear combination
of inputs    =   ω      =   ω  
– otherwise, nonlinear  
      > 
• nonzero initial conditions or finite offsets
make system nonlinear
• Time invariant system
– time invariant: time shift in input results in the
same time shift in output
  →     − τ  →   − τ 

• Differential or balanced system


– system with odd-symmetry
– no even order harmonics

– (b) nonlinear time-variant system


– (c) linear time-variant system
• a linear system can generate frequency
components that do not exist in the input
signal
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Gain Compression
• Memoryless, nonlinear system • Gain Compression
– For a nonlinear system that can be approximated – Small signal gain varies with input level
   ≈ α    + α      + α      – Most circuits, output is compressive or saturating
→ occurs if α3 < 0
– Small signal gain is a decreasing function of A
• Harmonics – 1-dB compression point: input signal level that
    =   ω   causes small-signal gain to drop by 1 dB
   = α    ω + α      ω + α      ω
α   α  
= α    ω +  +  ω  +   ω +  ω 
 
α   α    α  α 
=  + α   +    ω +   ω +   ω
     

– Even order harmonics result from αj with even j


– Amplitude of nth harmonic consists of a term 
  α  + α  −  =   α  − 
proportional to An and other terms proportional to 
higher power of A
α
– Neglecting latter for small A, nth harmonic grow in −  = 
proportion to An α

– Measure of maximum applicable input signal


– Around -20 to -25 dBm (63.2 to 35.6 mVpp in 50 Ω
Razavi98
system) in typical front-end RF amplifiers

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Desensitization and Cross Modulation
• Desensitization and Blocking • Cross Modulation
– Desensitization – Phenomenon that occurs when a weak and a
• Problem when process weak, desired signal strong interferer pass through a nonlinear system
with a strong interferer – Amplitude of interferer modulates the amplitude of
• Weak signal can experience smaller gain as weak signal
large signal tends to reduce average gain – From (1), if amplitude of interferer is modulated by

  =   ω  +   ω     +   ω     ω   

   = α    + α      + α     
 
     = α   + α   
   
= α   + α   + α      ω + !
       
  <<   ×  + +  ω   +   ω     ω + !
   
  
   = α  + α      ω + !
   – Desired signal at the output contains amplitude
• Gain becomes a decreasing function of A2 modulation at ωm and 2ωm
– For sufficiently large A2, gain drops to zero → – Common case of cross modulation
“blocked” • Amplifiers that must simultaneously process
– In RF design, “blocking signal” usually refers to many independent signal channel — e.g.,
interferers that desensitize a circuit though gain CATV transmitters
does not fall to zero • Full duplex CDMA systems — request for
– Many RF receivers require to withstand blocking super-linear LNA
signals 60 to 70 dB higher than the wanted signal

Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Intermodulation
• Intermodulation • Third-order IM (TOI)
– when two signals with different frequencies are – if the difference between ω1 and ω2 is small, the
applied to a nonlinear system component at 2ω1 - ω2 and 2ω2 - ω1 appear in the
– the output in general exhibits some components vicinity of ω1 and ω2
that are not harmonics of the input frequencies – in typical two-tone test, A1 = A2
  =   ω +   ω  
   = α    + α      + α     

   
ω = ω   ω  α   + α   + α      ω 
   
   
+ α   + α   + α      ω  
   
= ω  ± ω  α     ω  + ω   – Corruption of a signal due to intermodulation
+ α     ω  − ω   between two interferers
 • a weak signal with two strong interferers
= ω  ± ω   α      ω  + ω  


+ α     ω  − ω  


= ω  ± ω   α      ω  + ω  


+ α     ω  − ω  

Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Third-order Intercept Point (IP3)
• Third-order intercept point (IP3) • Calculation of IP3 without extrapolation
– IIP3 and OIP3

  =   ω  +   ω  
     
   = α  + α       ω  + α  + α       ω  
     
 
+ α     ω  − ω   + α      ω  − ω   + ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
 

• Example
 
 α  >> α      α    = α        =  
   = 

≈ −       = 


 
 α
∴   =
 α

• Relationship between A1-dB and AIP3


−     
  
 
= ≈ − 
  ! = 
≈ "
 
  Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


IP3 of Cascaded Nonlinear Stages
• Overall IIP3 of cascaded stages – As α1 increases, the overall IP3 decreases
• with higher gain in the first stage, the
second stage senses larger input levels,
thereby producing much greater IM3 product

– Since each stage has a narrow passband, out-of-


    = α    + α     + α    
  band signals are heavily attenuated
#   
     = β     + β   + β       α 
≈  + 
[
    = β α    + α      + α      ] 
      

[
+ β  α    + α      + α      ] 

+ β [α   + α  ]
 – for three or more stages
       + α   
= α  β    + α  β  + α α  β  + α  β       + !   α  α  β

≈  +  +  + ⋅⋅⋅
 α β         
∴   =
 α  β  + α α  β  + α  β    
≈ + +   + ⋅⋅⋅
    
– for worst-case estimate,
(Powers & gains in real value, not in dB)
 α  β  + α α  β  + α  β 


=

   α β – For gain greater than 1, the IP3 of latter stage
 α  β  α 
becomes increasingly critical
= + +  


   β   
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Adjacent Channel Power Rejection (ACPR)
• ACPR • Problem
– Adjacent channel power rejection – Lead to higher inband noise power
– Signal power leakage to the adjacent channel →
degrade adjacent channel (used by others) S/N
• Origin ratio
– Intermodulation

• CDMA ACPR
– Measure spectral power of the channel (1.23 MHz
Nonlinear
bandwidth)
System
– Measure upper and lower band edge (885 KHz)
 
 
  of the next adjacent channel power (30 KHz

  

 bandwidth)

  

 [] =
   


– Alternative method


 [ ]
 ⋅ %  ! $
= 



PA
 

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Random Process (I)
• Time average vs ensemble average • Probability density function (PDF)

   = ()) '   <  <  + 

– Gaussian (or normal) distribution

 −   −  
   = *(
σ π σ 
  −   −  
   <  <    =
σ π 
∫ *(
σ 


  − 
 + 
   = ∫

*(



+∞
<   >= &     = ∫    
 →∞  −  −∞

 +  +∞
    = ∫      
<     >= &
 →∞  ∫− 
    −∞ – AWGN: additive white Gaussian noise

– Q1: Is the time average measured today equal to – (ex) binary signal corrupted by noise
that measured tomorrow?
A: Not necessarily. If system is “stationary”, its
statistical properties are invariant to a time shift.
– Q2: Is the time average of a stationary process
equal to ensemble average?
A: Not always. But in most cases they are equal.
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Random Process (II)
 
• Power spectral density (PSD)      = &    
 →∞ 
– a Fourier transform of a random process is also a 
random process      = ∫   *(−  π 

– how much power the signal carries in a unit
bandwidth around f → characterized by power – Since Sx(f) is an even function of f for real x(t),
spectral density −   
∫− 
     + ∫      = ∫      
 

– in general, PDF and PSD have no relationship


• thermal noise: Gaussian PDF, white PSD
• flicker noise: Gaussian PDF, 1/f PSD

• Random signals in linear systems


– if a signal of Sx(f) is applied to a linear, time-
invariant system with transfer function H(s), then

    =     !   

!    = !  =  π 

Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Noise
• Thermal noise • this noise is negligible at low frequency, but
– Brownian random motion of thermally agitated it can dominate at RF
charge carriers 
– generated in every physical resistors ' = &δ ∆ 
 =
% 
• modeled by a voltage source in series • δ~4/3 in long device
(Thevenin representation) or current source
– both drain and gate noise share a common origin,
in parallel (Norton representation)
they are correlated
' &∆
' = &∆  =  =

 
 = & ∆
 
• Shot noise
– purely reactive elements generate no thermal
– Gaussian white process associated with the
noise
transfer of charge across an energy barrier
– p-n junction, gate-channel
• Thermal noise in MOSFET
– drain current noise  =   ∆


 =  γ
 ∆ • Flicker noise in MOSFET
– random trapping of charge at oxide interface
• γ~1 at zero VDS in long device, 2/3 in – modeled as a voltage source in series with gate
saturation, 2~3 for short-channel NMOS
– gate noise " %  "
 =

 
∆ ≈ ⋅ ω  ⋅  ⋅ ∆
• Thermal agitation of channel charge cause  #$  
fluctuation of channel potential. This couples
capacitively with gate terminal, leading gate – total flicker noise is integration from f1 to f2 → “DC”
noise infinities are not a practical problem Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Input-Referred Noise
• Input-Referred Noise • Noise addition
– Noise voltages do not combine in linear:
superposition do not apply

• (Ex) MOS equivalent noise model

– require both Vn and In for adequate representation


– must take into account correlation between Vn
and In
– determine Vn by shorting input, and In by opening
input

• Correlation
– Noise voltages produced independently, 
%  ' =  

 %    (  =  


• No relationship between instantaneous


 
voltage values 
+   = &  %  
 
 =  +  +    "& "&
' =   = 
%   %  ( 
• C = 1: full correlation, C = 0: uncorrelated
– since Vn and In represent same noise mechanism,
they are correlated
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Noise Figure
• Definition • Noise figure calculation
 + 
+  +

)* =

+  + + +
+ 
) )  + )  )
=  = = + 
)  )  ) 
 )   ) )
= =   =
  )    )  )

) ()  + )  ) )  + )  '  + ' +      '  + ' +     


= = =  )  (- ,   )* = =
)  )  )
'  ' 

• Noise Figure vs Noise Factor ' +     


= +
– Noise factor = SNRin/SNRout ' 
– Noise figure = 10log10(noise factor) – no correlation between VRS and Vn (or In), but
– Noise figure (or noise factor) measures the SNR correlation between Vn and In
degradation as a signal pass through a system – NF is typically specified for 1-Hz BW
• if a system has no noise, then NF = 1 = 0dB
• if input signal contains no noise, then SNRin ' +      ' 
)* =  +  )* =  

= ∞ and NF = ∞ (even though the system & 


 & 
has a finite internal noise) : this does not
occur in real world – function of source impedance RS
• in RF system, 50-Ω input and output
resistance are used
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Noise Figure Analysis
• Ex: resistors • Ex: feedback amplifier


'
= & ( !!   )α =
 +  
& ( !!   ) 
∴ )* = 
= +
   
  ⋅ &
  +   
– NF is minimized by maximizing RP
• condition for minimum noise figure does not
match with that for maximum power transfer


(cf) '


=

'  
=  ⋅ '
= ⋅ ' = ' '

 +    +   ( +  ) )* =
 
&
  
∴ '


= ' = α ' 
α =      ( + %     )
( +  )
 +  =  + %    +  + %   
     %  
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Noise Figure of Cascaded Stages (I)
• Cascaded noisy stages

'  '
α   ' 
= α  '  +     + '   )*

= =
  
 =α '[ +   + '  ]



   



⋅ &  α  α  α  ⋅ &

= α [ ' +   + '  ]
  α  ' + α      
 + '   
'  
   
=
 
     
 
α  α  ⋅ &
' 
= α   ' 
'     
 + '   
    = +

α  = α  = α  =  α  ⋅ & α   ⋅ & 
 +  
 +   
 +  
'  +      + '       + '   
  

= α  α   α  = +  ⋅   

&   &

  = α   . 


 =  
)* − 
)*

= )* +

Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Noise Figure of Cascaded Stages (II)
• Alternative derivation – For  stages, Friis equation,
– NF can be represented by available power gain
)* −  )* − 
)* = )* + +!+
  !    −
 + 
+

 =
 +  +

• NF of each stage is calculated with respect
• Available output power: power that circuit to the output impedance of previous stage
would deliver to a conjugate-matched load
• Available source power: power that source – the noise contributed by each stage decreases as
would deliver to a conjugate-matched circuit the gain preceding the stage increases
– first few stages are the most critical
– for cascaded noisy stages, – if a stage exhibits attenuation (loss), then NF of
the following circuit is amplified
α  ' '

 =    = 
 
  

∴  = α   


    + '   
)* = )* +   ⋅   

α   & 

     
 + '   
= )* + ⋅
α    &

)* 
 − 
= )* +

Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Noise Figure of Lossy Circuits
• Lossy passive circuits • Cascade of lossy filter and LNA
– passive devices attenuate desired signal, and
contribute noise

– Thevenin equivalent circuit for signal, )* 


 = $ = −


 +  +
 '     '  )* − 
$= =  =  
)*

= )* 
 +
 + 
+
 '  
 '  $−
= $ +  )* −  $ = $ ⋅ )*
  ' 
' 
= &
  = = $ + )* 
 

( + 
) 
'   + 

 
&
– With overall NF estimation, filter, attenuator, etc,
'
(  + 
)
∴ )* = = that comes in front of active components, can be
 ⋅ &   '  

treated as a part of active components
  ⋅ &
 '   + 

' 

= =$
' 
– Passive reciprocal network: NF is same as loss
(not apply to active circuit that has insertion loss)
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Sensitivity
• Definition – If input is conjugate matched, then
– minimum signal level that a system can detect
& 
with acceptable signal-to-noise ratio at the output  = = & = −2&!01
 

– since =  ×  −  3 & , &(


)   
)* = = ∴    = %−2&!01 + )* +    $ + ) 
)
)

/ : input signal power per unit BW



+  + 
/ : source resistance noise per unit BW
/ : function of bandwidth
  =  ⋅  ⋅ 
/ +(sensitivity) degrades with higher data
rates (BW increases)
– for flat channel,
  

=  ⋅ )* ⋅ )
⋅  Pin,min

   =   
+ )* 
+ )  
+   
 SNRout

/ : minimum total input power over 

Input (referred) noise floor = output noise floor - gain


Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Dynamic Range
• Definition
   %&$
, =
   %&$
4 
: maximum input level that the circuit can
tolerate
4 : minimum input level at which circuit
provides a reasonable signal quality
– differently quantified in different applications

• Spurious-free dynamic range (in RF) 4 


is obtained when  = * (input noise floor)
4 : sensitivity    + *
   =
4 
: maximum input level in a two-tone test for 
which IM3 < noise-floor
 * = −2& + )* +   


−  
– since  = F + ),
  =  +
    + *
 
=  +  
=   +  *, = −  * + )  

 −    −      − * 
  =  + = = − ) 
  
   +  
∴  = • Ex

4 )*5 5,&5601)5
→*,5
Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)


Impedance Transformation
• Impedance Transformation • Transform a resistance to a higher value
– transformer can transform impedance – capacitive divider
– high frequency transformer exhibits loss,
capacitive coupling between primary and
secondary, and even unwanted resonances

• RC circuits
  
– inductive divider 

≈  +    
  

– if Q is relatively high and band is narrow, then two  $ 




≈  +    
circuits are equivalent when ZS = ZP  $ 
 
+ (  =  + (  =   !! 
 
 +    
= • Transform a resistance to a lower value
  +   

∴    =     +    −     = 
ω   


   ≈    ≡   >>      ≈
  (ω  )



 ≈   ≈ -  
 (ω )

Razavi98

ICE669 (H. J. Yoo)

You might also like