Report On The Seminar Topic: Electronics and Telecommunication of University of Pune
Report On The Seminar Topic: Electronics and Telecommunication of University of Pune
________________________________________________________________________
delivered by
Student name (s) Exam Seat no.(s)
ASHWINI S. DESAI B3203028
MADHURI R. MOHOD B3203080
_____________________________________________________________________ 1
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
Bachelor of Engineering in
ELECTRONICS AND TELECOMMUNICATION of UNIVERSITY OF
PUNE ,
in
_____________________________________________________________________ 2
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Prof. Mr. A.R. Khedkar for his continuous valuable
guidance, support, valuable suggestions and his precious time in every possible way inspite of his
busy schedule throughout our project activity.
We would also like to express our gratitude towards our Project Co-ordinator Prof.
Mr. M.S. Patankar for his constant guidance during our project. We would also like to thank our
H.O.D. Prof. Mr. S.V. Kulkarni for his continuous encouragement.
We take this opportunity to express our sincere thanks to all the staff members of
Electronic and Telecommunication Department for their help whenever required. Finally we express
our sincere thanks to all those who helped us indirectly or directly in this project.
Student Names:-
1. Ashwini S. Desai Exam no:-B3203028
2. Madhuri R. Mohod Exam no:-B3203080
_____________________________________________________________________ 3
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
Digital multimedia applications create an ever increasing demand for broad band
communication systems. The technical requirements for related products are very high but
it is desired that the solutions must be cheap to implement, feasible or lead to sub optimal
results. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is a method that allows to
transmit high data rates over extremely hostile channels at a comparatively low
complexity than the traditional single carrier techniques.
This project aims at implementing OFDM system in Matlab and at observing its
performance in the presence of noise. By utilizing two techniques, namely-Companding
and Windowing we intend to obtain transmitted data with reduced Peak-to-Average Power
Ratio. In OFDM system, a large number of closely-spaced orthogonal sub-carriers are
used to carry data. The data are divided into several parallel data streams or channels, one
for each sub-carrier. Each sub-carrier is modulated with a conventional modulation
scheme such as quadrature amplitude modulation or phase shift keying at a low symbol
rate, maintaining total data rates similar to conventional single-carrier modulation schemes
in the same bandwidth. OFDM is especially suitable for high-speed communication due to
its resistance to intersymbol interference (ISI).
_____________________________________________________________________ 4
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
Index
4. OFDM Transceiver……………………………………………...…..16
4.1 OFDM Transmitter………………………………………..…....17
4.2 OFDM Receiver……………………………………………..…18
4.2.1 Serial to parallel conversion……………………………….....19
4.2.2 Subcarrier modulation……………………………………..…19
4.2.3 Frequency to time domain conversion…………………….....19
4.2.4 Guard Period……………………………………………..…..19
4.2.5 Cyclic Prefix………………………………………….….…..20
4.3 Effect of White Gaussian Noise……………………………….21
4.4 Channel Coding……………………………………………..…21
4.4.1 Frequency Selective Fading………………………………….22
4.4.2 Interleaving………………………………………………..…23
5. Peak-to-Average Power Ratio(PAPR)……………………………...23
6. Techniques to overcome high PAPR…………………………….....25
5.1 Companding………………………………………………...….25
5.2 Windowing…………………………………………………......26
_____________________________________________________________________ 5
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 6
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
RF Radio Frequency
RMS Root Mean Squared
SNR Signal to Noise Ratio
SSB Single Side Band
TDM: Time Division Multiplexing
TDMA: Time Division Multiple Access
UMTS: Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
Ms: Microsecond (10-6 s)
W-CDMA: Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access
WLAN: Wireless Local Area Network
WLL: Wireless Local Loop
_____________________________________________________________________ 7
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
These systems shift to more data oriented services such as Internet access.
Third generation systems use Wide-band Code Division Multiple Access
(WCDMA) as the carrier modulation scheme. This modulation scheme has a high
multipath tolerance, flexible data rate, and allows a greater cellular spectral
efficiency than 2G systems.
Third generation systems provide a significantly higher data rate (64 kbps – 2
Mbps) than second-generation systems (9.6 – 14.4kbps). The higher data rate of
3G systems will be able to support a wide range of applications including Internet
access, voice communications and mobile videophones.
In addition to this, they offer permanent network connectivity, such as wireless
appliances, notebooks with built in mobile phones, remote logging, wireless web
cameras, car navigation systems, and so forth.
_____________________________________________________________________ 8
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 9
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
2. OFDM System:
Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is becoming the chosen
modulation technique for wireless communications. Orthogonal Frequency Division
Multiplexing (OFDM) can be termed as an alternative wireless modulation technology to
CDMA. OFDM has the potential to surpass the capacity of CDMA systems and provide the
wireless access method for 4G systems. Many research centers in the world have specialized
teams working in the optimization of OFDM for countless applications.
History:
The origins of OFDM development started in the late 1950’s with the
introduction of Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) for data communications. In
1966 Chang patented the structure of OFDM and published the concept of
using orthogonal overlapping multi-tone signals for data communications. In 1971
Weinstein introduced the idea of using a Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) for
implementation of the generation and reception of OFDM signals, eliminating the
requirement for banks of analog subcarrier oscillators. This presented an opportunity
for an easy implementation of OFDM, especially with the use of Fast Fourier
Transforms (FFT), which are an efficient implementation of the DFT. This suggested
that the easiest implementation of OFDM is with the use of Digital Signal Processing
(DSP), which can implement FFT algorithms. It is only recently that the advances in
integrated circuit technology have made the implementation of OFDM cost effective.
The reliance on DSP prevented the wide spread use of OFDM during the early
development of OFDM. It wasn’t until the late 1980’s that work began on the
development of OFDM for commercial use, with the introduction of the Digital
Audio Broadcasting (DAB) system.
_____________________________________________________________________ 10
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
Because the signal reflects from large objects such as mountains or buildings, the receiver
sees more than one copy of the signal. In communication terminology, this is called
multipath. Since the indirect paths take more time to travel to the receiver, the delayed
copies of the signal interfere with the direct signal, causing ISI.
_____________________________________________________________________ 11
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
OFDM is especially suitable for high-speed communication due to its resistance to ISI.
OFDM overcomes the effects of multipath by breaking the signal into many narrow
bandwidth carriers. This results in a low symbol rate reducing the amount of ISI. In
addition to this, a guard period is added to the start of each symbol, removing the effects of
ISI for multipath signals delayed less than the guard period.
As communication systems increase their information transfer speed, the time for each
transmission necessarily becomes shorter. Since the delay time caused by multipath remains
constant, ISI becomes a limitation in high-data-rate communication. OFDM avoids this
problem by sending many low speed transmissions simultaneously. For example, the figure
below shows two ways to transmit the same four pieces of binary data.
Suppose that this transmission takes four seconds. Then, each piece of data in the left picture
has a duration of one second. On the other hand, OFDM would send the four pieces
simultaneously as shown on the right. In this case, each piece of data has a duration of four
seconds. This longer duration leads to fewer problems with ISI. Another reason to consider
OFDM is low-complexity implementation for high-speed systems compared to traditional
single carrier techniques.
_____________________________________________________________________ 12
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 13
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
2.3 Orthogonality:
Orthogonality:
Signals are orthogonal if they are mutually independent of each other.
Two signals are said to be orthogonal when their dot product is equal to zero.
Let’s take a sine wave of frequency m and multiply it by sinusoid of a frequency n,
where both m and n are integers. The integral or the area under the product is given
by:
f(t) = sin mwt x sin nwt
_____________________________________________________________________ 14
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
OFDM signals are made up from a sum of sinusoids, with each corresponding to a
subcarrier.
The baseband frequency of each subcarrier is chosen to be an integer multiple of the inverse
of the symbol time, resulting in all subcarriers having an integer number of cycles per
symbol. As a consequence the subcarriers are orthogonal to each other
The orthogonal nature of the transmission is a result of the peak of each subcarrier
corresponding to the nulls of all other subcarriers. When this signal is detected using a
Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) the spectrum is not continuous , but has discrete
samples.This will be elaborated in the transceiver section of OFDM.
OFDM Transceiver
3. OFDM Transceiver
3. OFDM Transceiver
_____________________________________________________________________ 16
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 17
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 18
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
In an OFDM symbol the cyclic prefix is a repeat of the end of the symbol at the
beginning
The purpose is to allow multipath to settle before the main data arrives at the receiver
The length of the cyclic prefix is often equal to the guard interval
_____________________________________________________________________ 20
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 21
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
and has memory that utilizes previous bits to encode or decode following bits. Convolution
encoder is defined with three variables: number of output bits n, number of input bits k and
memory depth L. Encoder maps k input bits into n output bits. From memory length can be
derived constraint length using the equation given below.
Constraint length tells how many output bits are influenced with single input bit. The error
correction capacity is related with this value.
C=n (L+1)
_____________________________________________________________________ 22
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
Path 1 is a direct signal and has a transmission distance of 10m, while the second path is a
reflection with a longer transmission distance of 25 m. This makes the two paths out of phase,
which results in a reduction in the signal amplitude at this frequency.
3.4.2 INTERLEAVING
Because of frequency selective fading, in OFDM certain sub channels can be located in a
deep fades in channel and information carried by these sub carriers are lost. This effect
causes errors to occur in bursts rather than being randomly scattered. To make errors appear
more randomly, interleaving is performed on the coded bit stream. Interleaving is a way to
permute bits in a certain way and at the receiver reverse permutation is performed. A
commonly used interleaving method is block interleaving. In block interleaving data is
written in to a matrix row-by-row and read out column-by-column.
By definition we have,
PAPR= Peak Amplitude of the Signal
Average value of the Signal
_____________________________________________________________________ 23
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
An OFDM signal consists of a number of independent sub carriers, which can give a large
peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) when added coherently. When N signals are
added with the same phase, they produce a peak power that is N times the average power.
As a result, linear behavior of the system over a large dynamic range is needed and the
efficiency of the output amplifier is reduced. The average power must be kept low in order
to prevent the transmitter amplifier saturation. Minimizing the PAPR allows higher.
By definition we have,
Where E{(xk)^2} stands for the expected value or average value of the time domain signal.
_____________________________________________________________________ 24
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
A) Companding
B) Windowing
5.1 Companding
In companding method, compression is used in the transmitter and expansion in the receiver. By
considering the approximate Rayleigh distribution of the OFDM amplitudes, we compress the
dynamic range with a memory-less transformation at the transmitter and expand the amplitude
level at the receiver. This transformation essentially changes the probability distribution of the
amplitude of OFDM signal and achieves the PAPR reduction by both enlarging the small
amplitudes and compressing large signals. The power is adaptively allocated for each sub-
carrier according to the distribution in each block.
Companding Transform
Our strategy in this work involves applying u-law companding at the transmitter to
reduce the PAPR of the transmitted waveform so as to reduce distortion through the
transmit amplifier and allow operation closer to amplifier saturation. Values of u ranging
between 0.125 and 64 were used in the study since the optimal performance was found to
reside within this range of operation.
Let sdat(n) be the baseband OFDM signal associated with the data symbol. In the case of u-law
companding for a selected u, the compressed OFDM signal, sc(n), is formed as:
Sc(n)= K(u) Smax{ ln[1+ u |Sdat (n)|]}
{ln[1+u]} * sign[Sdat (n)]
_____________________________________________________________________ 25
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
However, this approximation is not highly accurate, and in practice, would lead to
unnecessary degradation in the demodulation performance. To mitigate errors
introduced by normalization inaccuracies, numerically-determined values of K(u) were
computed and employed instead, where long-term power averages of both uncompanded
and companded OFDM symbols were numerically estimated to find K(u). The resulting
values are plotted in the figure along side the approximation.
_____________________________________________________________________ 26
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
An example of a time-domain signal associated with a data symbol before and after
companding (with u = 16) is shown in the figure below, where the companded signal is scaled
to yield an average power equal to the uncompanded signal. The net result is that companding
increases the low-level signal components and reduces the high-level signal components. In
the figure, the solid line corresponds to the uncompanded signal, and the dashed line
corresponds to the companded signal.
_____________________________________________________________________ 27
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
5.2 Windowing
A different approach to reduce the PAPR is to multiply large signal peak with a Gaussian shaped
window or any other window with good spectral properties. Since the OFDM signal is multiplied
with several of these windows the resulting spectrum is a convolution of the original OFDM
spectrum with the spectrum of the applied window. So, ideally the window should be as narrow
band as possible. On the other hand, the window should not be too long in the time domain,
because that implies that many signal samples are affected, which increases the bit error ratio.
Examples of suitable window functions are the Cosine, Kaiser and Hamming window. Peak
windowing technique offers reasonably good reduction in PAPR achieved independent from
number of sub-carriers, at the cost of a slight increase in BER and out of band radiation.
Windowing parameters, window width and attenuation factor, should be selected such a way that it
will reduce the PAPR. However, it is difficult to find a relationship between windowing
parameters and PAPR since the PAPR is random. Generally, the window width should be small in
order to avoid distorting many sample values and the attenuation factor should be selected by
considering PAPR reduction and signal distortion. Further, it is necessary to relate OFDM
parameters with peak windowing.
Peak windowing method is implemented by first considering the
clipping ratio. Here, OFDM signal is clipped whenever it exceeds a clip level say S. The
normalized clipping level, called the clipping ratio, is defined as
Where σ is the rms power of the OFDM signal and it can be shown that, for an OFDM signal
with N subchannels, s = N for a baseband signal and s = N / 2 for a bandpass signal.
OFDM signal is multiplied by the window function when the signal peak exceeds the
clipping level. Unlike the clipping, the OFDM signal within the windowing width is
modified. This results in a smoothed OFDM signal.
_____________________________________________________________________ 28
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
The PAPR reduction is achieved at the expense of bit error rate (BER)
performance degradation and the out of band radiation. On the other hand PAPR can not be
reduced beyond a certain limit by removing peaks, as the average value of the OFDM signal, also
decreases, which in turn increases the PAPR. Peak windowing method concerns only removing
the peak values, which have low probability of occurrence. OFDM signal exhibits some low
values, we will call it "bottoms", with low probability of occurrence, like peaks. By increasing
these bottoms above certain level, the average value of OFDM signal can be shifted up. These
results in PAPR reduction. Basically, this is like inverted windowing.
Peak Windowing distorts the OFDM signal causing inband distortion and out of band
radiation. Inband distortion causes to BER performance degradation. Figure 4.6 shows
the BER performance of an OFDM signal after windowing for different value of clipping
ratio. When clipping ratio is increased the BER performance is better, but, the reduction
in PAPR is not much. When clipping ratio is low, the amount of peaks removed is high.
Thus, signal has been distorted very much and BER performance degrades. When
clipping ratio is 1.8, there is about 0.5dB loss in SNR at 10-4 BER and PAPR is reduced
by 5dB.
_____________________________________________________________________ 29
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
Conclusion:
We have investigated the performance of OFDM system with companding and windowing as a
PAPR reduction strategy. Impairments from AWGN noise from the channel, and noise
amplification due to the expansion transform at the receiver were considered. MATLAB
Simulation was employed to investigate performance trends. We have seen that with an
appropriate choice of u and amplifier backoff, the companding system can outperform a
system without companding. Thus, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing is a form of
multi-carrier modulation technique with high spectral efficiency, robustness to channel fading,
immunity to impulse interference, uniform average spectral density capability of handling very
strong echoes and less non linear distortion. We have also inferred that by implementing
Windowing and Companding, the high PAPR of the OFDM system reduces and we obtain a
better quality signal at the receiver.
_____________________________________________________________________ 30
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
References:
1. www.skydsp.com
2. www.complex2real.com
3. OFDM Link Performance with Companding for PAPR Reduction in the Presence
of Non-Linear Amplification Thomas G. Pratt, Nathan Jones, Leslie Smee, and
Michael Torrey
4. Adaptive Techniques for Multiuser OFDM Eric Phillip LAWREY BE (Hons)
_____________________________________________________________________ 31
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 32
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 33
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune
Implementation of OFDM
________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________ 34
MKSSS’s Cummins College of Engineering, Pune