Scribd
Upload
58 views2 pages

Guidelines PROPOSAL EvalSheet ELEN 4810

This document provides guidelines for evaluating project proposals with a scoring rubric. It outlines 17 criteria across 7 categories to assess proposals on elements like the introduction, literature review, problem formulation, design, performance verification, cost analysis, and work plan. Reviewers use the 100-point scale to score how well the proposal addresses each criterion, such as allocating up to 10 points for clearly stated objectives and benefits in the introduction. The total scores across all criteria are summed to evaluate the overall proposal.

Uploaded by

raymond_d_lewis4221
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
58 views2 pages

Guidelines PROPOSAL EvalSheet ELEN 4810

This document provides guidelines for evaluating project proposals with a scoring rubric. It outlines 17 criteria across 7 categories to assess proposals on elements like the introduction, literature review, problem formulation, design, performance verification, cost analysis, and work plan. Reviewers use the 100-point scale to score how well the proposal addresses each criterion, such as allocating up to 10 points for clearly stated objectives and benefits in the introduction. The total scores across all criteria are summed to evaluate the overall proposal.

Uploaded by

raymond_d_lewis4221
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ELEN 4810 Guidelines for the Proposal Evaluation Sheet

Project title ____________________ Semester ____________


I. Introduction

1. Title: 2 - for title; 3-statement describing why selected _____ / 5


2. Objectives: 5 - goals; 2 - bulleted list of benefits; 3 – bulleted list of features
_____ / 10
II. Literature Search

3. Literature Review: 2 - Relevant information are identified and collected _____ / 2


4. Information: 2 - Reviewed and assessed with respect to their quality, validity
and accuracy is presented using a standard and ethically referenced format _____ / 2

III. Problem Formulation

5. Problem Statement: 5 - Logically formulated _____ / 5


6. Realistic Constraints: 5 – technical, economic, environmental, social, etc. _____ / 5
7. Strategy: 5-how to deal with the constraints _____ / 5

IV. Design

8. Block Diagram: 3- Diagram itself ; 2- Modularity _____ / 5


9. Block Descriptions: 2 – Interface among blocks; 4 – function of each block;
4 – How each block contributes to overall design? _____ / 10
10. Performance Requirement: 5- Quantitative requirements;
5 – Requirement Description _____ / 10
11. Special Circuit: if necessary _____ / 5

V. Performance and Verification Requirements

12. Testing Procedures: 5 – Testing plan; 5 – thoroughness – i.e. if all tests pass,
how sure would be that the products meet the performance requirements _____ / 10
13. Tolerance Analysis: 2 – choosing one component that does matter and
saying why it does matter; 2 – stating how this test will be run (specific) _____ / 4

VI. Cost

14. Cost Analysis: 2 – Justified project budget; 2 – Labor; 2 – parts and


Outsourcing (If necessary) _____ / 6
15. Expected return: 2 – How long? If applicable _____ / 2

VII. Work Plan

16. Effective Design Strategy: 2-Plan of attack; 2-an executable timetable _____ / 4
17. Schedule: 2 – how specific tasks are; 2 – schedule with one person in charge _____ / 4
18. Responsibility of Team Members: 3 – decomposition of work into subtasks;
3 – balanced responsibilities _____ / 6

Total _____ / 100

You might also like