Connection Details for Prefabricated 

Bridge Elements and Systems 

March 30, 2009

Publication No. FHWA-IF-09-010

 Foreword

This document has been developed for the purposes of promoting the use of prefabricated elements
and systems in bridges as part of accelerated construction projects. Accelerated construction and
long term durability are integral parts of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Bridge
Program. Part of this program focuses on a need to create awareness, inform, educate, train, assist
and entice State DOT’s and their staff in the use of rapid construction techniques.

This document represents the “State of the Practice” at this time with respect to accelerated bridge
construction. Most of the details were obtained after an extensive search process that included the
following sources:
State Departments of Transportation
Industry organizations
Private consultants
International organizations

In several cases, details were developed by the authors where details did not surface during the
search process. These details have been labeled as “conceptual”. The authors developed these
details based on experience with similar details and materials. Owners should evaluate the
effectiveness of these details for use in specific bridges.

This information contained herein should be used to develop designs that have the purpose of
accelerating the construction of bridge projects. This will assist designers in determining which
details would be appropriate for accelerated construction techniques. Some of the considerations
for accelerated construction are:
• Improved work zone safety.
• Minimizing traffic disruption during bridge construction.
• Maintaining and/or improving construction quality.
• Reducing the life cycle costs and environmental impacts.

Prefabricated components produced off-site can be quickly assembled, and can reduce design time
and cost, minimize forming, minimize lane closure time and/or possibly eliminate the need for a
temporary bridge.

This document is organized so that designers can pick and choose the details that will eventually
make up the final bridge. In most cases, several options are presented for a particular connection.
The details are presented on concise one page (2 sided) data sheets that can be pulled and copied.
This will allow the designer to quickly build a “detail library” that will be specific to the intended
project.

This document only focuses on “details” for connections of prefabricated bridge elements and
systems. Some guidance is given for general accelerated construction techniques. The Federal
Highway Administration will publish a more encompassing accelerated bridge construction manual
in the future, that will likely include or reference this work.

Byron Lord Myint Lwin

Program Coordinator Director
Office of Highways for LIFE Office of Bridge Technology
 Notices

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the
interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the use of the
information contained in this document. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or
regulation.

The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trademarks or manufacturers’
names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the objective of the
document.

The details and information included in this document are examples from previous
projects. The agency that developed and used the detail is listed on most of the data sheets.
Users of this manual are encouraged to contact the original agencies to ensure that the detail
is appropriate for use on the intended project.

Information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. The
Federal Highway Administration and its contracted authors are not responsible for any
errors, omissions or damages arising out of this information. The Federal Highway
Administration has published this work with the understanding that they are supplying
information only. As with any design, sound engineering judgment should always be used.

Quality Assurance Statement

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high-quality information to serve government,
industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are
used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA
periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous
quality improvement.
 Technical Report Documentation Page
1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No.
FHWA-IF-09-010
4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date
Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems March 30, 2009
6. Performing Organization Code

7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No.

Michael P. Culmo, P.E.
9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No.
CME Associates, Inc.
333 East River Drive, Suite 400 11. Contract or Grant No.
East Hartford, CT 06108 DTFH61-06-C-00036
12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered
Office of Bridge Technology, HIBT-10 Final Document
Federal Highway Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code
6300 Georgetown Pike
McLean, VA 22101-2296
15. Supplementary Notes
Technical Review done by Vasant Mistry, Raj Ailaney and Gary Jakovich of Federal Highway Administration.
16. Abstract
Prefabricated components of a bridge produced off-site can be assembled quickly, and can reduce design time and cost,
minimizing forming, minimize lane closure time and/or possibly eliminate the need for a temporary bridge. This document has
been developed to promote the use of prefabricated elements and systems in bridges and focuses on "Connection Details" as
part of accelerated construction projects. Accelerated Bridge Construction is one of the prime focus areas of the Office of
Infrastructure of Federal Highway Administration. It focuses on a need to create awareness, inform, educate, train, assist and
entice State DOT’s and their staff in the use of rapid construction techniques. This document represents the “State of the
Practice” at this time with respect to connections between prefabricated elements in accelerated bridge construction projects.
Most of the details were obtained from State Departments of Transportation, industry organizations, and private consultants.
This information contained herein should be used to develop designs and determine which details would be appropriate for
accelerating bridge construction projects.

17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement

Bridges, connections, details, elements, prefabricated, No restrictions. This document is available to the public through
concrete, streel, timber, FRP, precast the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA
22161.

19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No of 22. Price
Unclassified Unclassified Pages

Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed pages authorized

 LISTING OF ACRONYMS

The following is a listing of typical acronyms that may be found in this document.

Acronym Definition

ADT Average daily traffic

AMVA American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
ACI American Concrete Institute
AISC American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc.
AISI American Iron and Steel Institute
AMTRAK National Railroad Passenger Corporation
(Amtrak is not a governmental agency; it is a private company called the
National Railroad Passenger Corporation)
ANSI American National Standards Institute
ASBI American Segmental Bridge Institute
ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
C SHRP Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program
CD Compact Disc
CERF Civil Engineering Research Foundation
CFLHD Central Federal Lands Highway Division
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CRP Cooperative Research Program (TRB)
CSD Context sensitive design
DOT Department of Transportation
ECMT European Conference of Ministers of Transportation
EFLHD Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division
EIT Electronic information and technology
EU European Union
EUREKA European Research Coordination Agency
F SHRP Future Strategic Highway Research Program (now known as SHRP 2)
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FAQs Frequently Asked Questions
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FRP Fiber-reinforced polymer
FY Fiscal year
GIF Graphic Interchange Format
GSA U.S. General Services Administration
HBP Highway Bridge Program
HBRRP Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
HITEC Highway Innovative Technology Evaluation Center
HRTS Office of Research and Technology Services
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HTML HyperText Markup Language
IBTTA International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
JPEG Joint Photographic Experts Group
LRFD Load and resistance factor design
NAS National Academy of Sciences
NBI National Bridge Inventory
NBIS National Bridge Inspection Standards
NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program
NCSRO National Conference of State Railway Officials
NDE Nondestructive evaluation
NEXTEA National Economic Crossroads Transportation Efficiency Act of 1997
NHI National Highway Institute
NHS National Highway System
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology
NRC National Research Council
NSF National Science Foundation
NTSB National Transportation Safety Board
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PCA Portland Cement Association
PCC Portland cement concrete
PCI Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute
PDF Portable Document Format
PI Principal Investigator
QC/QA Quality control/quality assurance
R&D Research and development
SAFETEA Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003
SCOBS Subcommittee on Bridges and Structures (AASHTO)
SCOH Standing Committee on Highways (AASHTO)
SCOR Standing Committee on Research (AASHTO)
SFLHD Southern Federal Lands Highway Division
SHA State highway administration
SHRP Strategic Highway Research Program
TIFF Tagged Image File Format
TRB Transportation Research Board
TRIS Transportation Research Information Services (TRB)
TRL Transportation Research Laboratory
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation
WFLHD Western Federal Lands Highway Division
 Table of Contents

Foreword

Introduction

Chapter 1 – General Topics

1.1 Benefits of Prefabrication
1.2 Accelerated Construction Overview
1.2.1 When to Use Accelerated Construction
1.2.2 Rehabilitation Projects
1.2.3 Typical Accelerated Construction Approaches
1.2.3.1 Short-term Full Closure Projects
1.2.3.2 Weekend Closures
1.2.3.3 Overnight Closures
1.2.4 Examples of Prefabricated Elements
1.2.5 Opportunities for Architectural Treatments
1.3 Applicability to Typical Bridges
1.3.1 New Bridges
1.3.2 Replacement of Existing Bridges
1.3.3 Rehabilitation of Existing Bridges
1.3.4 Issues with Curved, Skewed and Flared Bridges
1.3.5 Truss Bridges and Girder Floorbeam Bridges
1.4 Typical Accelerated Construction Connection Types
1.4.1 Steel Elements
1.4.1.1 Bolted
1.4.1.2 Welded
1.4.1.3 Cast-in-place Concrete closure pours with shear studs
1.4.2 Concrete Elements
1.4.2.1 Principles of Emulation Design
Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers
Grouted Post Tensioning (PT) Ducts
Grouted Voids
Traditional Post-Tensioning (PT)
Welded Connections
Bolted Connections
Cast-in-place Concrete Closure Pours
1.5 Seismic Considerations
1.5.1 General Criteria
1.5.2 Connection of Superstructure to Substructure
Pinned Connections
Moment Connections
1.5.3 Superstructure Connections
1.5.4 Columns and Column Connections
Confinement Reinforcement
1.5.5 Footings
1.5.6 Deep Foundations
1.5.7 Research
1.6 Materials

Page TOC-1 Table of Contents

 1.6.1 Concrete
1.6.2 Structural Steel
1.6.3 Timber
1.6.4 Fiber Reinforced Polymers
1.6.5 Grouts
1.6.5.1 Grout types
Gas Generating
Ettringite
Air Release
1.6.5.2 Environmental Conditions
Temperature
Moisture
Surface Preparation
1.6.5.3 Placement Methods
Dry Pack
Pouring
Pumping
Post-tensioning Duct Grouting
1.6.5.4 Curing
Wet Curing
Curing Temperature
Curing Compounds
1.6.5.5 Specifications
1.6.5.6 Quality control
Test Pours, Trial Batching, and Mock-Ups
Grouting of Post-tensioning Dects
1.7 Tolerances
1.7.1 Element tolerances
1.7.2 Dimensional growth
1.7.3 Hardware tolerances
1.7.3.1 Post-tensioning systems
1.7.3.2 Grouted reinforcing splice couplers
1.7.3.3 Embedded attachments
1.7.4 Layout and Joint widths
1.7.5 Closure Pours
1.7.6 Camber Issues
1.7.7 Specification requirements
1.8 Fabrication and Construction Issues
1.8.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
1.8.1.1 Fabricator Certification
1.8.1.2 Near Site Fabrication
1.8.1.3 Inspection
1.8.2 Handling and Shipping
1.8.2.1 Element Weight and Shipping
Over the Road Shipping Limits
Barge and Rail Access
Near Site Shipping
Crane Capacities
Lifting Hardware
Use of Self-propelled Modular Transporters (SPMT’s)
Member stresses during lifting

Page TOC-2 Table of Contents

 1.8.2.2 Recommended Design Approaches for Element Weight
1.8.2.3 Imperfections, Damage and Repair
1.8.3 Constructability
1.8.3.1 Cranes
1.8.3.2 Self Propelled Modular Transporters
1.8.3.3 Temporary Support of Elements
1.8.3.4 Time Constraints
1.8.3.5 Assembly Plans

Chapter 2 – Superstructure Connections

2.1 Deck Systems
2.1.1 Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs
2.1.1.1 Connections Between Slab Elements
Strength Direction
Distribution Direction
Connection Design Considerations
2.1.1.2 Connections to Steel Beam Framing
2.1.1.3 Connections to Concrete Beam Framing
2.1.1.4 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings
Concrete Parapets and Curbs
Steel and Aluminum Railings
2.1.2 Open Grid Decks
2.1.2.1 Connections Between Grids
2.1.2.2 Connections to Steel Framing
2.1.2.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings
2.1.3 Concrete/Steel Hybrid Decks
Partially Filled Grid Decks
Exodermic Decks
2.1.3.1 Connections Between Panels
2.1.3.2 Connections to Steel Framing
2.1.3.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings
2.1.4 Fiber Reinforced Polymer Decks
2.1.4.1 Connections Between Panels
2.1.4.2 Connections to Steel Framing
2.1.4.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings
2.1.5 Partial Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panels
2.1.5.1 Connection to Steel Beam Framing
2.1.5.2 Connections to Concrete Beam Framing
2.1.5.3 Joints Between Panels
2.1.6 Timber Deck Panels
2.1.6.1 Connection Between Panels
2.1.6.2 Connections to Framing
2.1.6.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings
2.1.7 Grouting Techniques for Deck Systems
2.1.7.1 Joint Grouting
2.1.7.2 Shear Connector Pocket Grouting
2.1.7.3 Post-Tensioning Duct Grouting
2.1.7.4 Bedding under deck panels
2.1.8 Grade Control and Tolerances

Page TOC-3 Table of Contents

 2.1.9 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Prefabricated
Deck Systems
2.1.9.1 Reflective Cracking and Leakage
Poor Joint Configurations
Lack of Post-Tensioning
Reflective Cracking in Concrete Topping over Partial Depth Deck Panels
2.1.9.2 Riding Surface Issues
2.1.10 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
2.1.11 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
Elimination of Post-Tensioning
2.1.12 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Deck Systems
2.2 Adjacent Butted Beam Systems
2.2.1 Precast Prestressed Concrete Deck Bulb Tee Systems
2.2.1.1 Connections Between Beams
2.2.1.2 Welding and Grouting Issues
2.2.1.3 Camber Issues
2.2.2 Precast Prestressed Concrete Tee Systems
2.2.2.1 Connections Between Beams
2.2.2.2 Span to Span Connections
2.2.2.3 Welding and Grouting Issues
2.2.2.4 Camber Issues
2.2.3 Precast Prestressed Adjacent Slab and Adjacent Box Beam Systems
2.2.3.1 Connections Between Slabs and Between Adjacent Box Beams
Traditional Post-Tensioning and Bolted Systems
Reinforced Closure Pours
Welded Connections
2.2.3.2 Concrete Over Pours and Composite Toppings
2.2.4 Glue Laminated Timber Adjacent Deck Slabs
2.2.4.1 Connections Between Slabs
2.2.5 Grade Control and Tolerances
2.2.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Adjacent Beam
Systems
2.2.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
2.2.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
2.2.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Adjacent Butted Beam Systems
2.3 Decked Stringer Systems
2.3.1 Transverse Connections
2.3.1.1 Connections Between Steel Beams
2.3.1.2 Connections Between Prestressed Precast Beams
2.3.2 Longitudinal Connections
2.3.2.1 Steel Beams
2.3.2.2 Prestressed Precast Concrete Beams
2.3.3 Simple Span Beams Made Continuous For Live Load
2.3.3.1 Prestressed Precast Concrete Beams
2.3.3.2 Steel Beams
2.3.4 Tolerances
2.3.5 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Stringer Beam
Systems
2.3.6 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
2.3.7 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
2.3.8 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Decked Stringer Systems

Page TOC-4 Table of Contents

 2.4 Modular Prefabricated Superstructure Systems
2.4.1 Precast Deck/Stringer Systems (inverset)
2.4.1.1 Transverse Connection Between Units
2.4.2 Large Precast Deck/Stringer Superstructure Systems for Bridges with
Floorbeams
2.4.2.1 Connection to Steel Floorbeams
2.4.3 Precast Concrete Arch Systems
2.4.3.1 Connection Between Arch Elements
2.4.3.2 Connection Between Arch Segments
2.4.3.3 Connection of Spandrel Walls
2.4.4 Precast Concrete Box Culverts
2.4.5 Grade Control and Tolerances
2.4.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Modular
Prefabricated Superstructure Systems
2.4.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
2.4.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
2.4.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Modular Prefabricated Superstructure
Systems
2.5 Connections between Superstructures and Substructures
2.5.1 Integral Pier Caps
2.5.2 Integral Abutments
2.5.3 Semi-Integral Abutments
2.5.4 Structural Bearings
2.5.5 Grade Control and Tolerances
2.5.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Superstructure to
Substructure Connections
2.5.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
2.5.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
2.5.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Superstructure to Substructure
Connections
2.6 Miscellaneous Superstructure Connections
2.6.1 Utilities and Drainage Assemblies and other Appurtenances
2.6.2 Barriers, Curbs and Railings
2.6.3 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Superstructure
Connections
2.6.4 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
2.6.5 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
2.6.6 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Miscellaneous Superstructure
Connections

Chapter 3 – Substructure Connections

3.1 Pier Elements
3.1.1 Precast Concrete Cap Beam Connections
3.1.1.1 Connection to Cast-in-Place Concrete Columns and Piles
3.1.1.2 Connection to Precast Columns
3.1.1.3 Connection to Steel Piles (pile bents)
3.1.1.4 Connection to Precast Concrete Piles (pile bents)
3.1.1.5 Connection of Precast Concrete Cap to Precast Concrete Cap
3.1.2 Precast Concrete Column Connections
3.1.2.1 Connection of Column to Column

Page TOC-5 Table of Contents

 3.1.3 Wall Pier Connections
3.1.3.1 Connection of Precast Wall to Precast Footing
3.1.4 Precast Concrete Column to Footing Connections
3.1.4.1 Connection to Cast-in-Place Concrete Footing
3.1.4.2 Connection to Precast Concrete Footing
3.1.5 Grade Control and Tolerances
3.1.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Prefabricated Pier
Systems
3.1.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
3.1.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
3.1.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Pier Systems
3.2 Abutment Systems
Backfilling Options
3.2.1 Cantilever Wall Abutments
3.2.1.1 Precast Abutment Stem to Precast Footing Connection
3.2.1.2 Precast Backwall to Abutment Stem Connection
3.2.1.3 Precast Breastwall (cheekwall) to Abutment Stem Connections
3.2.2 Spill-through Abutments
3.2.3 Precast Concrete Integral Abutments
3.2.3.1 Connection Between Abutment Stem or Cap and Steel Piles
3.2.3.2 Connection Between Abutment Stem or Cap and Concrete Piles
3.2.3.3 Connection Between Adjacent Abutment Stems or Caps
3.2.4 Miscellaneous Abutment Connections
3.2.4.1 Flying Wingwalls
3.2.4.2 Approach Slabs
3.2.5 Grade Control and Tolerances
3.2.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Prefabricated
Abutment Systems
3.2.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
3.2.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
3.2.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Abutment Systems
3.3 Wingwall and Retaining Wall Systems
3.3.1 Cantilever Walls
3.3.1.1 Precast Wall Stem to Precast Footing Connection
3.3.1.2 Precast Wall Stem to Precast Wall Stem Connection
3.3.2 Modular Precast Wall Systems
3.3.2.1 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Systems
3.3.2.2 Modular Block Systems
3.3.3 Tolerances
3.3.4 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Prefabricated
Wall Systems
3.3.5 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
3.3.6 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
3.3.7 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Wingwall and Retaining Wall Systems

Chapter 4 – Foundation Connections

4.1 Footing and Pile Systems
4.1.1 Precast Footing to Subgrade Connections
4.1.2 Precast Footing to Precast Footing Connections
4.1.3 Precast Footing to Steel Pile Connections

Page TOC-6 Table of Contents

 4.1.4 Precast Footing to Precast Concrete Pile Connections
4.1.5 Precast Footing to Cast-in-place Pile or Drilled Shaft Connections
4.1.6 Precast Pile to Precast Pile Connection
4.1.7 Precast Pier Box Cofferdams
4.1.8 Grade Control and Tolerances
4.1.9 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Prefabricated
Footing and Pile Systems
4.1.10 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
4.1.11 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices
4.1.12 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Footing and Pile Systems

Appendices
Appendix A: Connection Design Examples
Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs
Precast Column Connections
Column to Cap Connection using mild reinforcement embedded in
grouted post-tensioning duct
Precast Column Connections
Precast Column Connections using Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers
Appendix B: Proprietary Products
Prefabricated Superstructure Systems
Inverset
Effideck™
CON/SPAN® Bridge Systems
BEBO® Concrete Arch System
HY-SPAN® Bridge System
Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers
NMB Splice Sleeve
Dayton Superior DB Grout Sleeve
Erico Lenton Interlok Rebar Splicing System
Proprietary Retaining Wall Systems
Reinforced Earth® and Retained Earth™ Retaining Walls
Doublewal Retaining Wall
T-WALL® Retaining Wall System
Post-Tensioning Systems
Dydiwag Systems
VSL Post-Tensioning Systems
Williams Threadbar Systems
Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
New Hampshire DOT – Prefabricated Substructures
New Hampshire DOT - Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs
Maine DOT – Prefabricated Integral abutments, piers and approach slabs
Texas DOT Precast Column Connections:
Column to Cap Connection using mild reinforcement embedded in
grouted post-tensioning duct
Appendix D: Case Studies
New Hampshire DOT
Mill Street over the Lamprey River, Epping, New Hampshire
Texas DOT
State Highway 36 over Lake Belton, Belton, Texas

Page TOC-7 Table of Contents

 Texas DOT
Short Span Local Bridges in Texas
Hypothetical Bridge Replacement Project using All Prefabricated Components.
Details taken from this document
Appendix E: Glossary
Appendix F: References

Page TOC-8 Table of Contents

 Introduction
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has undertaken a program called
Highways for LIFE. The word “LIFE” in this program title is an acronym for:

L = Long lasting
I = Innovative
F = Fast construction
E = Efficient and safe

The thrust of this program is to change the way we design and build our highways. A
former Deputy Secretary for the US Department of Transportation put it best when he
stated:
“Change the way we build highways. We need to build them faster, have them
last longer, have them be safer and at a lesser cost. Be BOLD and AUDACIOUS
in your thinking."

The Highways for LIFE program motto is: “Get In, Get Out, and Stay Out”. The first two
portions of the motto are self explanatory. The “Stay Out” portion refers to the inherent
lasting quality of prefabricated components that are produced in the controlled
environment of a fabrication site. Just because something can get built fast does not
mean that we need to sacrifice quality. In fact, the exact opposite is true. We can build
highways faster and better.

The focus of this Manual is on connections used in prefabricated bridge construction.

Prefabrication is not a new concept. The vast majority of bridges built today employ
some form of prefabrication. Steel and pretensioned concrete beams are two of the
most common prefabricated components. Using prefabrication, large portions of the
structure are manufactured off site before construction begins. There are many benefits
to the use of prefabricated components; however, this Manual will focus on
prefabrication as a means of accelerating bridge construction.

Numerous agencies have experimented with rapid construction techniques when bridges
needed to be constructed quickly. There have been many successes, and a few
failures. The next logical step in the evolution of this process is to make accelerated
construction more commonplace and effective.

This type of evolution is not unprecedented. Forty years ago, parking garage structures
were constructed primarily with cast-in-place concrete (either all concrete or concrete on
steel framing). Today, in most parts of the country, total precast concrete parking
structures are the norm and construction times for these structures have been
dramatically reduced as a result. The fact that structures using prefabricated elements
and systems are common in a competitive construction market also indicates the
economies of this type of construction.

Accelerated Construction Technology Transfer Program (ACTT)

The FHWA has sponsored numerous three-day workshops under their
Accelerated Construction Technology Transfer Program (ACTT). During each
workshop, a team of national experts visited a state highway agency to
brainstorm on a particular project proposed for accelerated construction
techniques. Each workshop provided the state agency with a wealth of
information to be used as the building blocks for a successful accelerated

Page INT-1 Introduction

 construction project. During these workshops, the following were identified as
common needs for successfully implementing accelerated bridge construction:

• Quality details
• Long-term performance and durability
• Design methodologies and training
• Construction methodologies

Manual Intent
This Manual is intended to focus primarily on the first three items listed above.
Construction methodologies have been partially addressed in previous FHWA
manuals and will be further addressed in a future FHWA manual.

This Manual has been prepared through the perspective of an owner agency. It
is intended to be used by bridge design engineers at the structure type study
phase of a design project. Each bridge will have unique design constraints.
The details included in this Manual are not intended to be simply inserted into a
design. The bridge design engineer will need to adapt each detail for the
specific geometric criteria and structural demands that are anticipated.

The development of a manual on connection details for prefabricated bridge

elements and systems must evaluate what techniques have been used in the
past. To be considered viable, any connection detail or process needs to pass
a test:
• Does it result in a rapid construction process?
• Does it transmit the forces between elements and systems effectively?
• Is it durable?
• Has it performed well under traffic and in exposed environments?
• Is it cost effective?
• If a process or connection is proprietary, can it be incorporated into
numerous projects without producing contracting issues?

If the answer to any of these questions is “no”, then the connection should not be
considered. The details included in this Manual have passed this test.
Performance ratings are given for each detail. In most cases, these ratings were
assigned by the agency that submitted the detail and are, therefore, subjective.
Users of this Manual should critically evaluate each detail and judge whether it is
appropriate for the intended use. The agency and person who submitted each
detail are listed. Users are encouraged to contact these engineers for further
information on specific details.

Sources of Details
This Manual includes a compilation of details used by various agencies. The
vast majority of connection details have been put into practice on bridges. There
are several details in the Manual that have not been used on actual bridges;
therefore, these are labeled as conceptual.

The details in this Manual were obtained by a solicitation to all 50 state highway
agencies; 19 state highway agencies responded. Federal agencies, suppliers,
industry groups and fabricators were also contacted. The details that met the
criteria listed above were sent to the authors for development of this Manual. In
many cases, the details were simply copies of the original contract plans. These

Page INT-2 Introduction

 details were re-drafted in order to present a consistent representation throughout
the manual. The authors recommend that users of this Manual contact the
agency that provided the detail if there are questions. To assist the user, the
following information is presented for each connection included in this Manual:

• Agency providing the detail

• Contact person’s name, address, telephone number, and e-mail address
• Project description

It is understood that not all contact persons may be available in the future.
However, with the information provided, a user should be able to locate persons
in each agency who are familiar with the details.

The details provided in this document by no means represent all prefabricated

bridge construction projects in the United States. The authors are aware of
numerous other projects that were not submitted by the owner agencies. In
addition, there are numerous planned prefabricated bridge construction projects
that are either in construction or awaiting bidding. Designers should keep
apprised of further developments in prefabricated bridge elements and systems
through the Federal Highway Highways for LIFE website at:
www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl/

Manual Format
The Manual has been divided into four chapters. Chapter 1, “General Topics,”
addresses issues that are common to most connections in bridge construction.
Chapters 2, 3 and 4 address issues which are specific to the major portions of
typical bridges, in accordance with the terminology in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge
Design Specifications [1]:

Chapter 2: Superstructures: Decks, beams, stringers, modular

superstructure prefabricated systems, connection between
superstructures and substructures, and miscellaneous
superstructure details
Chapter 3: Substructures: Piers, abutments, walls (to top of footings)
Chapter 4: Foundations: Footings, piles

This Manual is formatted to help users find the correct detail through a logical
hierarchy that will be consistent with a web site application. The chart in Figure 1
depicts this Manual layout:

Page INT-3 Introduction

 Figure I-1: Manual Format

Forward
Table of Contents
Introduction

Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Appendices

General Topics Superstructure Substructure Foundation
Connections Connections Connections

1.1 2.1 3.1 4.1 Appendix A

Benefits of Deck Systems Pier Systems Footing and Pile Connection Design
Prefabrication Systems Examples

1.2 2.2 3.2 Appendix B

Accelerated Adjacent Butted Abutment Systems Proprietary Products
Construction Beam Systems
Overview

1.3 2.3 3.3 Appendix C

Applicability to Decked Stringer Wingwalls and Sample Const.
Typical Bridges Systems Retaining Wall Specifications
Systems

1.4 2.4 Appendix D

Typ. Accelerated Modular Case Studies
Construction Prefabricated
Connection Types Superstructures

1.5 2.5 Appendix E

Seismic Conn. between Glossary
Considerations Superstructures and
Substructures

1.6 2.6 Appendix F

Materials Miscellaneous References
Superstructure
Connections

1.7
Tolerances

1.8
Fabrication and
Construction

Page INT-4 Introduction

 Detail Classification
To help users of this Manual understand the practicality of each detail, the
authors and members of the FHWA Office of Bridge Technology Staff developed
a level classification that categorizes each detail based on its frequency of use
and effectiveness. This level classification is somewhat subjective; however, it
provides the user a measure of effectiveness of the detail. By assigning these
levels, the authors and the FHWA staff do not endorse or guarantee the
performance of each detail. Users of this Manual are reminded that sound
engineering judgment must be applied to all bridge designs.

Three classifications have been developed for this Manual based on the following
general criteria:

Level 1
This is the highest classification level. It is assigned to connections that
have been used on multiple projects or that have become standard
practice by at least one owner agency. Level 1 details are typically
practical to build and will perform adequately.

Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only once and were
found to be practical to build and have performed adequately.

Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental or conceptual.
Some Level 3 details have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical use on a
bridge. Also included in the Level 3 classification are conceptual details
that have not been studied in the laboratory, but are thought to be
practical and useful.

Connection Detail Data Sheets

The authors intend users of this Manual to be able to “shop” for details for use on
new projects. To facilitate this use, the details are presented on simple two-page
data sheets that can easily be removed and copied from the Manual. Each data
sheet contains the following information:

Originating Organization Information:

This information includes the organization, contact person information
and a description of the project where the detail was used.

Connection Details:
In most cases, the original contract details are presented; when available,
multiple details are presented in order to properly present each
connection.

Description, Comments, Specifications and Special Design Procedures:

Page INT-5 Introduction

 This section contains additional information on the connection including
design information and issues that may have been encountered during
the construction of the connection. If photographs were available, they
are presented in this section.

Performance Data:
This section contains information on the age and durability of the
connection. Agencies were asked to rate the performance of each
connection on a scale of 0 to 10 as part of the submission. The ratings
include:
• Speed of Construction
• Constructability
• Cost
• Durability
• Inspection Access
• Future Maintenance

Figure I-2 presents an abbreviated sample connection data sheet.

Page INT-6 Introduction

 Figure I-2
Sample Connection Data Sheet – Page 1

Page INT-7 Introduction

 Figure I-2
Sample Connection Data Sheet – Page 2

Page INT-8 Introduction

 Chapter 1 – General Topics
1.1 Benefits of Prefabrication
There are numerous benefits to the use of prefabrication beyond accelerated
bridge construction. Prefabrication can improve the quality of bridge elements
and systems since they are constructed in a controlled environment using high
quality materials and standardized production processes. Improved quality leads
to an extension of the structure service life. Prefabrication can also reduce
bridge construction costs and life-cycle costs.

A major advantage of prefabrication is that it can reduce onsite construction time,

resulting in several key benefits when compared to conventional on-site
construction practices:
• Traffic: The disruption of traffic is often cited as a reason for using
accelerated construction techniques. Reduction in lane closures and the
number of days of traffic detours can have a measurable affect on the
user costs of a highway system.
• Safety: By reducing the amount of construction that takes place at the
site, the amount of time that construction crews and motorists are
exposed to the dangers of work-zones is also reduced. In addition,
prefabrication can improve construction crew safety when working over
water or in hazardous conditions such as when construction is adjacent to
high voltage power lines.
• Environmental: Often environmental permitting requirements limit onsite
construction, for example, to certain seasons of the year. These
limitations effectively reduce the number of available calendar days for
construction. Prefabrication and accelerated construction can keep a
project on schedule even with fewer available working days and other
environmental limitations at the site.
• Weather: As with environmental constraints, many areas of the country
have limited work seasons due to severe winter weather. Prefabrication
and accelerated construction can be used to complete more construction
during a short construction season.

Page 1-1 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.2 Accelerated Construction Overview
This section includes a brief overview of the accelerated construction process for
bridges. Several FHWA documents on accelerated construction already exist and
are hereby referenced to supplement this section:
• Decision-Making Framework for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and
Systems (PBES) [2]
• Manual on Use of Self-Propelled Modular Transporters to Remove
and Replace Bridges [3]

A future FHWA manual is planned that will present information on accelerated

bridge construction systems and processes that are not directly related to
connections. This manual will include concepts such as total bridge
prefabrication and installation.

1.2.1 When to Use Accelerated Construction

There are a number of scenarios where accelerated bridge construction is
appropriate. On many projects, construction of the bridges is the critical
path to the overall completion of the project. This may not be the case for
large roadway projects where there are few bridges. In this case, the
roadway construction is usually the critical path.

At this time, there can be a cost premium for using accelerated bridge
construction techniques. Many designers believe that this will change in
the future as more accelerated bridge construction projects are
undertaken. Contractors and fabricators will continue to become more
proficient in the techniques, thereby improving the economy of
accelerated construction. Other common scenarios that can offset or
justify additional costs for accelerated construction include:
• Improved Safety: Any change to traffic flow can increase safety
risks to motorists. Reducing onsite construction time reduces
these safety risks to both motorists and construction crews in the
work zone.
• Elimination of Temporary Bridges: Temporary bridges are often
used for projects where detours are undesirable and staging is not
feasible. However, a short-term detour combined with accelerated
bridge construction can often be used instead of a temporary
bridge, thereby reducing the overall project cost.
• Elimination of Detour Repairs: Roads used for detour routes are
often not designed for the high traffic volumes over the extended
periods required for conventional construction. Accelerated
construction can eliminate the need for detour repairs.
• Reduced User Costs: User costs for highly congested highways
can be significant, often exceeding the additional cost of
accelerated construction. Several states account for user costs
for projects in the preliminary design phase of most projects in
order to make educated decisions on the approach to the project.
The user costs are factored into the cost for each construction
option considered.

Page 1-2 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.2.2 Rehabilitation Projects
Several types of rehabilitation projects commonly use accelerated
construction techniques. Often bridge rehabilitation projects present the
greatest challenges for maintaining traffic flow during construction.
Common rehabilitation projects that use accelerated construction
techniques are:
• Bridge Deck Replacement: Many states (especially in northern
environments) are experiencing bridge deck life-spans that are
less than the life span of the overall bridge. New high
performance materials and protective coatings can extend the life
of a bridge deck; however, a large percentage of the national
bridge inventory includes bridges with decks that will need to be
replaced in the next 30 years. Prefabricated bridge deck elements
made with precast concrete, filled steel grids and fiber reinforced
polymers have been successfully installed on existing bridges with
either weekend or overnight lane closures.
• Superstructure Replacement: Bridges with deteriorating bridge
decks often have deteriorating support beams as well. The cost of
removing lead paint on steel or repairing deteriorated concrete
can approach or exceed the cost of new beams. If a bridge deck
is already scheduled to be replaced, and repairs are anticipated to
the support framing, it may be cost effective to replace the entire
superstructure. In this case, a full prefabricated superstructure
can be a means to replace the entire bridge superstructure in as
little as one night.

1.2.3 Typical Accelerated Construction Approaches

During the development of this Manual, there have been several common
types of approaches to accelerated bridge construction projects:
1.2.3.1 Short-term Full-Closure Projects
This approach involves the full closure of the roadway for an
extended (but shortened) period of time. In this case, the
contractor is given free use of the entire site, which will often result
in very fast construction. This option is feasible if there is a
reasonable detour around the project area. There are impacts
with local businesses with this option; however, several states
have noted that the businesses can better tolerate a short-term full
closure when compared to a lengthy construction process.

1.2.3.2 Weekend Closures

On many bridge sites, traffic volumes drop off dramatically during
weekends. This is especially true for urban environments. In
many cases, multiple lanes and even entire roadways can be
closed for approximately 50 hours during a typical weekend. By
using prefabrication, bridge decks and entire superstructures can
be replaced and re-opened to traffic during this time frame.

1.2.3.3 Overnight Closures

A typical overnight construction window is limited to 8 hours or
less. This limits the amount of work that can be accomplished
even with the use of prefabrication. In this scenario, full or partial

Page 1-3 Chapter 1: General Topics

 superstructure prefabrication is often employed. Several projects
have been successfully completed using these techniques. The
most dramatic involved the placement of an entire superstructure
in less than one hour.

1.2.4 Examples of Prefabricated Elements

For the purposes of this manual, the term “Elements” describes individual
prefabricated components that make a system, e.g., deck panels are
elements that make a superstructure system and bent caps are elements
that make a substructure system.

Prefabrication is not a new concept. The vast majority of bridges built

today employ some form of prefabrication. Steel and pretensioned
concrete beams are two of the most common prefabricated elements on
typical bridges. Partial-depth precast concrete deck panels have also
been used in some regions for many years. Other common accelerated
bridge elements include:
• Full-Depth Prefabricated Decks: Several different types of
prefabricated decks are used, including full-depth precast
concrete panels, steel grids (unfilled, filled and exodermic), fiber
reinforced polymer panels, and glue laminated timber panels.

Figure 1.2.4-1 Full Depth Precast Deck Panels

Page 1-4 Chapter 1: General Topics

 o Pier Caps: Several states use precast pier caps due to the
difficulties of casting a large concrete element high in the air or
over water. Precast pier caps have been used on both pile bent
piers and standard concrete pier bents.

Figure 1.2.4.-2 Precast Pier Cap

In recent years, states have used more prefabricated elements to build

bridges faster. These include:
• Pier columns
• Pile cap footings
• Abutment stems
• Integral abutments
• Footings
• Barriers

These elements will be discussed in more detail in the following chapters.

Page 1-5 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.2.5 Opportunities for Architectural Treatments
An ancillary benefit of prefabrication is the opportunity to incorporate
architectural features. Many prefabricated elements are made with
precast concrete. Several states (Texas in particular) have taken
advantage of precasting to apply significant architectural features to the
prefabricated bridge elements. Figure 1.2.5-1 shows a precast pier cap
constructed on a pair of cast-in-place columns. Architectural treatments
typically found in building construction can also be applied to bridge
projects. This gives designers significant opportunities to work with
communities in the context sensitive design process to produce bridges
that are preferable to the users.

Figure 1.2.5-1 Lake Belton Bridge

(Photo Courtesy of TX DOT)

Page 1-6 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.3 Applicability to Typical Bridges
Prefabrication and accelerated construction are not limited to large scale or
signature bridges. Many states are applying this technology to ordinary bridges.
Prefabrication and accelerated construction techniques can be applied to a
variety of bridge projects, as discussed below:

1.3.1 New Bridges

New bridge construction offers a significant advantage when compared to
rehabilitation or replacement projects in that there is often little or no
conflict with traffic. These sites are often the least constricted; therefore,
larger equipment can be used to move and erect the prefabricated
pieces. Even if traffic control is not an issue, prefabrication and
accelerated construction can be used to minimize impacts to the
environment and to build a bridge faster in a harsh environment. In
addition, the use of identical repeating elements, for example, precast
pier caps, reduces costs.

1.3.2 Replacement of Existing Bridges

Bridge replacement projects differ from new bridge projects in that there
is usually a need to maintain traffic on the roadway. In some cases, a
detour can be arranged; however, detours can have a devastating impact
to local communities and businesses. Prefabrication and accelerated
construction can be used to reduce the time that detours are in place to
minimize the impact of the project on the community.

In cases where traffic must be maintained, accelerated construction can

be used to reduce the time for lane closures and diversions. It can also
eliminate the need for temporary bridge structures. If a bridge can be
replaced with an existing detour route combined with accelerated
construction, the owner agency can save the significant costs and
eliminate the environmental impact of a temporary bridge.

1.3.3 Rehabilitation of Existing Bridges

In parts of the country where there is already a mature highway network,
a large portion of the assigned bridge projects involve rehabilitation of
existing bridges. In many cases, this involves deck replacements,
superstructure replacements, and bridge widening. Prefabrication and
accelerated bridge construction techniques have proven very valuable for
these types of projects, especially where lane closure limitations are
severe. Many prefabricated bridge rehabilitation projects, for example,
deck replacements, have been successfully completed in as little as one
weekend.

1.3.4 Issues with Curved, Skewed and Flared Bridges

The complexity of the geometry of curved, severely skewed, or flared
bridges combined with the lack of repetitive details makes prefabrication
for these types of bridge a challenge. This does not preclude the
possibility of using prefabrication for these structures, however.
Prefabricated bridge deck replacement projects have been completed on
bridges with significant skews and flared exit ramps, and prefabrication
can be the solution of choice when widening or rehabilitating these

Page 1-7 Chapter 1: General Topics

 structures over traffic. Attention to tolerances and field fit-up is essential
for these complex structures.

1.3.5 Truss Bridges and Girder-Floorbeam Bridges

Truss bridges and bridges with girder-floorbeam systems offer unique
challenges, but also an opportunity for prefabrication. During one
successful project, the entire floor system was replaced with only
overnight traffic closures. In this example, the deck on the Lewis and
Clark Bridge in Washington State was replaced using a precast
deck/stringer system. Figure 1.3.5-1 shows the original and the final
cross-section of the bridge. The floorbeam system on the truss bridge
was highly stressed in bending, but had reserve shear capacity. By
varying the spacing of the stringers, the designers were able to reduce
the bending moments in the floorbeams, thereby increasing the load
capacity of the bridge. By using an innovative gantry crane, full-width
sections were removed and replaced with full-width prefabricated sections
during night closures.

Page 1-8 Chapter 1: General Topics

 Figure 1.3.5-1 Lewis & Clark Bridge
(Detail Courtesy of Washington State DOT)

Page 1-9 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.4 Typical Accelerated Construction Connection Types
During the development of this manual, information on various types of
prefabricated connections were collected from across the country. The details
can be categorized into several common types. These types make up the
majority of connections discussed in this manual.

1.4.1 Steel Elements

1.4.1.1 Bolted
Bolted connections have been used to connect prefabricated bridge
elements for many years. The process of bolting two pieces of steel
together can be very fast for some connections and slow for others.
Girder splices tend to be slow connections due to the large number of
bolts required to make the connection.

One way to speed up construction of bolted connections is to allow a

contractor the option to place only a portion of the bolts before the
crane releases a particular piece. The National Steel Bridge Alliance
is currently writing a steel bridge erection guide that will likely
recommend that 50 percent of all bolts in each portion of a connection
be installed prior to member release. This means that 50 percent of
the bolts in the flanges and the webs need to be in place. By allowing
a crane to release an element faster, the overall construction can
proceed more rapidly.

1.4.1.2 Welded
Field welding is not as common as field bolting in most states. This is
due to several factors:
• Lack of certified field welders
• Difficulties with welding in colder environments
• Concerns with the quality of field welds
• Time
Recently, several states have started to expand the use of field
welding and have developed procedures that address these concerns.
These new procedures show promise to increase the speed of steel
element connections.

1.4.1.3 Cast-in-Place Concrete Closure Pours with Shear Studs

Several structure types make use of concrete to connect two steel
elements. The idea of connecting two girders at a bridge pier shows
the most promise. The concept is to design the girders as simple
spans for dead load and as continuous spans for live load. This
concept has been used for many years in the precast industry. The
connection of two steel girders can be made by encasing the girder
ends in a concrete closure pour. The live load continuity connection is
transferred through the reinforced closure pour and back to the steel
member via welded stud shear connectors, or bearing plates.
Depending on the geometry of the closure pour, the shear studs can
be placed on the girder flanges or webs.

1.4.2 Concrete Elements

Page 1-10 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.4.2.1 Principles of Emulation Design
The America Concrete Institute has published a document entitled
“Emulating Cast-in-Place Detailing in Precast Concrete Structures
ACI-550.1 R01” [4]. The goal of emulation design is to achieve
performance of a prefabricated system that is comparable to a cast-in-
place system. For emulation design in seismic regions, the goal is for
a prefabricated system to be comparable to a cast-in-place system in
performance such as energy dissipation, ductility, stiffness, strength,
and similar reliable failure modes. Cast-in-place concrete structures
are built with construction joints that usually involve lapped reinforcing
bars. The principal of emulation design is to substitute an alternate
connection that mimics or “emulates” the standard lap splice. This
approach has been developed primarily by the precast parking garage
and hotel industry. By using emulation, a bridge designer or
contractor can substitute precast concrete elements for traditional
cast-in-place elements.

ACI-550.1 goes into great detail on different connections; therefore,

the authors suggest referring to this document. The following sections
outline some of the most common emulation connections:

Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers

Several manufacturers have developed couplers that can splice
large diameter reinforcing steel bars within precast elements.
These couplers are typically hollow cast steel sleeves (similar to a
pipe). The sleeve is cast into the end of one element and a
protruding reinforcing bar is cast in the end of the adjacent
element. The elements are connected by inserting the protruding
bars from one element into the hollow end of the coupler in the
other element. The joint between the pieces is then grouted, and
grout is pumped into the couplers to make the connection.

Casting tolerances are important with these couplers; however,

the precast industry has demonstrated on many projects that the
required tolerances are achievable on plant produced precast
products.

Large diameter bars can be spliced in distances that are much

less than conventional development lengths; an attribute which
makes this connection desirable for substructure connections with
large bars (pier caps, columns, etc.). These connections can be
made quickly in tight confines. It is reasonable to obtain a full
moment connection in as little as 12 hours. Temporary struts can
be used to allow erection of the elements prior to grouting.

Sleeved connections are most often used in the vertical direction.

They can be used in the horizontal direction, but this can
complicate the erection procedure because of the difficulty of
rigging a large element with small tolerances.

Page 1-11 Chapter 1: General Topics

 These connections have been thoroughly tested and can develop
up to 125%, 150% and even 160% of the specified yield strength
of the reinforcing bars.

Grouted Post-Tensioning (PT) Ducts

Several states have experimented with the use of PT ducts for
connections between precast concrete elements. These
connections are similar to grouted reinforcing splice couplers in
that reinforcing bars or threaded rods are inserted into a sleeve
made up of standard post-tensioning duct. The difference is that
the duct is non-structural; therefore, additional confinement
reinforcing is required around the pipe to develop a significant
connection. The PT duct is much larger than a grouted coupler;
therefore, tolerances are not as strict. Research to date has
demonstrated that significant moments can be achieved with this
system; however, the system is currently not recommended for
high seismic areas that require plastic hinging of connections.
These connections have not demonstrated the required ductility
required in high seismic zones.

Grouted Voids
Like PT ducts, these connections are similar to grouted splice
couplers except the coupler is simply replaced with a void cast in
the receiving element. These connections typically have been
used on connections that are considered pin connections that will
transfer little or no moment between the elements.

Traditional Post-tensioning (PT)

PT connections have been used between precast concrete
elements for years. The most common type of PT connection is
between pieces in a segmental box girder bridge. Several states
have also used PT for connections in pier columns and pier caps.
Another common use of PT is in precast concrete bridge decks.
Many states have used PT combined with grouted shear keys to
connect deck elements (typically the PT is run in the longitudinal
direction on typical stringer bridges). The PT systems often used
include multiple grouted strands in ducts and grouted high
strength thread bars.

Welded Connections
Precast elements can be connected using welding. This process
is common in the building and parking garage industry. Steel
plates are embedded in the precast elements and a welded
connection is made after erection. Several states have developed
and researched welded connections for precast butted beam
systems such as slabs, double tees and even deck bulb tee
girders.

Bolted Connections
Bolting of precast elements is rare, due to the difficulties of
working with the tight tolerances required for quality bolting.

Page 1-12 Chapter 1: General Topics

 Several states have used bolting to connect steel diaphragms on
parallel precast stringer bridges; however, differential camber
between members can make this connection difficult. Another use
of bolting is to connect precast concrete parapet elements.
Several states have used bolts that are drilled and grouted into the
bridge deck to secure the precast parapet to the deck. Designers
should check with each state regarding these connections; some
have not been crash tested and approved for used on the national
highway system.

Cast-in-place Concrete Closure Pours

One of the simplest connections that can be made between two
precast concrete elements is to leave a small area between the
elements to allow for a closure pour of cast-in-place concrete.
This is often done on horizontal connections that make sleeved
connections difficult to achieve. The connection is usually made
using simple lap splices.

1.5 Seismic Considerations

During seismic events, connections between bridge elements must resist the
highest force demand and cyclic effects. This section discusses current criteria
for seismic details, and provides information on current and proposed research.

1.5.1 General Criteria

The design and detailing of elements and connections in a prefabricated
bridge for seismic forces generally needs to be similar to designs and
details in non-prefabricated bridges. All provisions specified in AASHTO
LRFD Bridge Design Specification [1] need to be satisfied in any bridge.
This includes, but is not limited to, reinforcing steel in footings, plastic
hinge zones, column confinement, and connections between the
superstructure and substructure. There is on-going research into
alternate connection designs for high seismic regions [5]

1.5.2 Connection of Superstructure to Substructure

There are several methods of connecting normal stringer bridges to the
substructures. In most cases, these connections are designed to
transmit lateral seismic forces from the superstructure to the
substructure. It is also possible to make the connection integral.

Pinned Connections
In most states, the connection of the superstructure to the
substructure is detailed as a pinned connection. Integral
connections are also specified, but are not as common. The
most common type of pinned connection is through the bearing
device. The forces are transmitted from the superstructure,
through the bearing and then into the substructure. Often this is
accomplished using anchor rods. However, the current
AASHTO design specifications do not address the resistance of
embedded anchor rods in concrete. A pending revision to the
AASHTO specifications will include a reference to the American
Concrete Institute Building Code Requirements for Structural
Concrete (ACI 318), Appendix D [6]. This ACI code addresses

Page 1-13 Chapter 1: General Topics

 the issue of resistance of imbedded anchor rods in great detail.

Another means to provide lateral restraint is to install keeper

assemblies adjacent to beams. Keeper assemblies usually
consist of concrete keys placed between two interior beams to
transmit lateral forces from the superstructure to the
substructure. The assemblies are usually cast after the beams
have been erected; therefore, tolerances are not a significant
issue. Longitudinal seismic forces can be resisted by the
abutment backwall. Keeper assemblies are often the most cost
effective means of restraining a bridge for seismic events in low
seismic zones. They are especially desirable on skewed
concrete pier bents where the tight confines of reinforcing steel
make installation of anchor rods very difficult (if not impossible).
The location of the reinforcing steel in the keeper assemblies is
not as critical as an anchor rod; therefore they can be easily
adjusted to fit the field conditions. Figure 1.5.2-1 shows a typical
keeper assembly used in the northeast states.

Figure 1.5.2-1 Concrete Keeper Assembly

There are other options for seismic restraint such as cable

restrainers and seismic isolation devices. These methods are
also acceptable; however, they are not commonplace and are
therefore not included in this Manual.

Moment Connections
Moment connections between substructures and superstructures
are used to provide additional stability to the structure during
seismic events and to eliminate bridge deck joints. These
connections can also reduce lateral displacements of the structure
and reduce forces in the foundations. Integral pier connections
and integral abutment connections are common in high seismic
regions. This requires high moment demand on the connections.
The most common type of connection between prefabricated
elements is a cast-in-place closure pour. There is concern in the

Page 1-14 Chapter 1: General Topics

 industry that grouted reinforcing splice couplers and grouted PT
ducts are not capable of developing plastic hinges in these high
demand connections; therefore their use has been limited. It is
anticipated that future research will address these concerns. See
Section 1.5.4 for more discussion on this topic.

1.5.3 Superstructure Connections

In conventional stringer bridges having no integral connection between
the superstructure and substructure, there is relatively low force demand
on superstructure elements. The superstructure does see seismic forces;
however, the majority of the seismic induced forces are found in the
substructure. If the superstructure is integrally connected to the
substructure, large seismic forces can be transmitted to the
superstructure. In this scenario, engineers must take care in designing
connections between prefabricated bridge superstructure elements in
addition to connections in substructure elements, including superstructure
design for overstrength conditions.

1.5.4 Columns and Column Connections

Columns are often the most heavily loaded elements during a seismic
event. Special care must be taken to properly detail connections in
precast concrete column elements. In high seismic regions, columns
are designed to form plastic hinges and contribute to dissipation of
seismic forces. The high demand region on a typical column is at the
ends where the column connects to the footings and pier caps.

Semi-ductile moment connections can be made in precast elements by

using grouted reinforcing splice couplers for longitudinal reinforcing
steel confined by transverse reinforcing steel. Research from Japan
has shown that the grouted reinforcing splice couplers can fully develop
the longitudinal reinforcing bars as well as contribute to shifting the
plastic hinge away from the extreme end of the column [7].

Grout filled reinforcing splice couplers are capable of developing 125%

reinforcing steel yield strength. Some states require at least 150% of
the specified steel yield strength of the bar be developed for splices in
plastic hinge zones. Some grout filled reinforcing splice couplers and
grouted post-tensioning duct can also achieve this level of strength.

The AASHTO specifications allow for splicing 100% of the longitudinal

bars with mechanical splices at one location for low to moderate seismic
zones. Low seismic zones are defined Zones 1 and 2 in the LRFD
Specifications [1]. For higher seismic categories and zones, the codes
require staggering every other bar by a distance of 24 inches (Section
5.10.11.4.1f of the LRFD Specifications [1]). A grout filled reinforcing
splice coupler behaves differently than a lap splice. The strength of the
splice is not dependent on the concrete surrounding the sleeves.
Therefore, limitations for locations of lap splices caused by lack of cover
concrete in the hinge zones in theory should not be applicable to
mechanical connectors. There are ongoing discussions within the
industry on this topic, and future research may explore this issue.

Page 1-15 Chapter 1: General Topics

 There is one way to meet the AASHTO requirements using grouted
reinforcing splice couplers. The designer can detail one-half of the
sleeves on one side of the connection and one-half of the sleeves on
the other side of the connection. Another way to accomplish this is to
place the mechanical connectors within the footing where loss of
confinement is not a factor; however, locating the connectors in a pier
cap connection may still be an issue due to possibility of loss of cover
on the side faces of the pier cap.

Confinement Reinforcement
Some designers believe that the only way to confine column
reinforcing is to use spiral confinement reinforcing that passes
into the footing or pier cap, making precast columns impractical.
This, however, is not the case. AASHTO provisions for
confinement based on cast-in-place concrete construction
should be followed.

Longitudinal bars can be confined with transverse ties detailed in

accordance with the AASHTO specifications. Transverse ties
can be used in place of spiral stirrups as long as they are
properly detailed to achieve confinement. The AASHTO LRFD
Specifications [1] states:
“Column transverse reinforcement, as specified in Article
5.10.11.4.1d, shall be continued for a distance not less
than one-half the maximum column dimension or 15.0 in.
from the face of the column connection into the adjoining
member.”

Section 5.10.2.2 states:

“Seismic hooks shall consist of a 135°-bend, plus an
extension of not less than the larger of 6.0 db or 3.0 in.
Seismic hooks shall be used for transverse reinforcement
in regions of expected plastic hinges. Such hooks and their
required locations shall be detailed in the contract
documents.”

These provisions do not require the confinement steel to pass

through the joint between the column and pier cap or footing.
Therefore, it is acceptable to properly terminate the transverse
tie confinement steel at the end of the precast column, and also
in the adjoining member by using ties in place of spiral
reinforcement. The AASHTO Subcommittee on Bridges and
Structures continues to look into these issues; therefore, users
of this Manual should refer to the AASHTO specifications for the
latest requirements.

1.5.5 Footings
The design of precast footings for seismic forces should follow normal
procedures for cast-in-place concrete footings. Requirements must be
met for confinement of column dowels.

1.5.6 Deep Foundations

If precast pile caps are used, special details may be required to provide

Page 1-16 Chapter 1: General Topics

 pile uplift and moment capacity in precast footings. Several states have
developed details for footing connections that consist of extending the
pile reinforcing into a concrete closure pour pocket. Several conceptual
methods for connecting a precast footing to steel or precast piles have
also been developed by the Northeast Regional PCI Bridge Technical
committee and are included in data sheets in this manual.

Several states have used prefabricated concrete panels to form a

cofferdam on top of precast piles and drilled shafts. These cofferdams
eliminate the need for deep sheeting and dewatering that have been
commonly used for years. The prefabricated panels form a pier box that
when used in conjunction with a tremie concrete pour provide a platform
and area in which to cast the pier footing and connect it to the drilled
shaft or pile below.

1.5.7 Research
There is ongoing research into connections between prefabricated
elements in high seismic zones, including column and cap-to-column
connections using various types of connectors. Designers should refer to
the results of these research projects for guidance.

Page 1-17 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.6 Materials
This section provides an overview of the many different types of materials used
in prefabrication and discusses the impact of the materials on accelerated
construction processes.

1.6.1 Concrete
Concrete is a popular material for prefabrication and accelerated
construction projects. The ability to build elements off site in virtually any
shape makes this material a prime choice for designers. Common
prefabricated concrete elements include beams and girders, full depth
deck slabs, and pier caps. Several states have built entire bridges using
precast concrete elements including pier columns, abutment stems,
footings, and retaining walls.

Concrete is also used for making connections between different

prefabricated bridge elements. These connections often require the use
of high early strength concrete to allow for accelerated construction
processes.

Durability is a major concern of bridge owners. The new generation of

high performance concretes offer durability that far exceeds the
performance of past concretes. Plant produced precast concrete also
has the advantage of being constructed in a controlled environment with
higher production and curing standards than normally found in the field.
This benefit of accelerated construction projects is often overlooked by
designers.

1.6.2 Structural Steel

Steel elements are well suited for prefabrication and accelerated
construction. There is a high degree of control over fabrication
tolerances; therefore, complex connections can be employed using
structural steel. Common elements include steel beams and girders,
steel grid decks (including concrete and grid exodermic decks), and steel
railings. Other less common applications include steel pier columns and
bents.

One advantage that steel has over precast concrete is that it typically
weighs less than an equivalent concrete element. This factor can be
critical when shipping and crane capacities limit the amount of room for
erection. A disadvantage relative to precast concrete is steel’s greater
flexibility. More attention is required to ensure deflections and internal
stresses of elements and systems are not exceeded during transport.

1.6.3 Timber
Timber bridges were common in the 1800’s. There has been a
resurgence in the use of timber as a bridge material during the last two
decades. The use of glue laminated products and the introduction of
composites make the design of larger timber bridge elements more
practical and cost effective. Common types of prefabricated timber bridge
elements include glue laminated deck panels and glue laminated beams
and stringers.

Page 1-18 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.6.4 Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRP)
There has been much research into the use of fiber-reinforced polymers
in recent years. Many states and universities have experimented with
these materials. The development of carbon fiber polymers has made the
use of FRP materials practical for bridge applications. Types of FRP
bridge elements include beams and stringers and full-depth deck panels.
The state of New York has had FPR deck systems in place for almost a
decade with excellent performance.

1.6.5 Grouts
The majority of precast concrete elements discussed in this Manual are
joined with grout. The connections between precast concrete elements
require the use of grout to fill the void between the adjoining elements.
Nominal width joints are required for several reasons. The primary
reasons are to allow for element tolerances and to make adjustments in
the field. See Section 1.7 for more information on element tolerances.

Non-shrink cementitious grout is most often used to easily and efficiently

provide a durable, structurally stable connection between precast
concrete elements. Epoxy grouts can be used; however, they tend to
have a low modulus of elasticity and are expensive when compared to
cementitious grouts. In order to achieve desired results, careful selection
and specification is required when using non-shrink grouts.

1.6.5.1 Grout types

There is no such thing as a generic non-shrink grout. There are
several different types of grouts, each with its own advantages and
disadvantages. Cementitious non-shrink grouts are inexpensive,
generally easy to work with, and develop adequate strengths in
reasonable time. These grouts are often pre-packaged and can be
extended using small diameter stone for larger pours. Cementitious
grouts are ideal for static and light dynamic loadings. This section will
focus on cementitious non-shrink grouts since they are adequate for
virtually all prefabricated connections. Other grout types may be
acceptable for precast connections but require additional specification
and suitability considerations on the part of the designer.

Ideally a non-shrink cementitious grout will not exhibit dimensional

change in the plastic or hardened state. To achieve non-shrink
characteristics in grout, additives are mixed into the grout to
counteract the natural tendency of grouts to shrink. There are
different types of additives for cementitious grouts in the market. The
additives have certain advantages and disadvantages. Several
common additives are as follows:

Gas generating:
This is the most common grout type. A chemical substance is
added to the grout mixture to control shrinkage. In most cases, an
aluminum powder is used. A chemical reaction occurs with the

Page 1-19 Chapter 1: General Topics

 aluminum powder and the alkalis in the cement during the plastic
phase to form hydrogen gas. The generated gas is used to
promote expansion.

However, because small amounts of aluminum powder are used,

the expansion can be difficult to control under various conditions.
This uncontrolled expansion can cause bleed water to form at the
grout surface that can cause loss of support and bond. This has
led to the development of alternative compounds that can ensure
a quality grout under varying conditions.

Ettringite:
Ettringite expansive grout relies on the growth of ettringite crystals
during the hardened state to counteract shrinkage.

Air release:
Air release grouts do not rely on a chemical reaction to achieve
expansion. The additive reacts with water to release air and
cause expansion.

1.6.5.2 Environmental Conditions

Each of the additives mentioned above rely on specific conditions to
achieve a desired result:

Temperature:
The temperature at the time of placement needs to be carefully
controlled for some grouts. In particular, gas generating non-
shrink grouts have a small window of acceptable temperatures for
achieving the desired expansion. Cold temperatures can inhibit
the chemical reaction, thus limiting expansion. Higher
temperatures can cause rapid expansion that limits placement
time. The typical temperature range for grout placement is
between 40 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Designers should
investigate manufacturer’s requirements for grouting in
temperatures beyond these typical ranges. For extreme
conditions, the area may need to heated or cooled during the
curing process.

Moisture:
Water should always be added to non-shrink grout in strict
accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. Deviation from
specified water content can adversely affect the performance of
the grout. Trial batching of grout should always be specified in
contract documents.

For example, ettringite crystals grow during the grout’s hardened

state. If too little water is added or if water is drawn out of the
mixture due to a dry surrounding substrate, the expansive growth
will be less than desired. Conversely, over-watering can cause
segregation, increased shrinkage and reduced strength. Over-

Page 1-20 Chapter 1: General Topics

 watering can cause bleed water to accumulate at the grout
surface, leading to loss of support and bond.

Surface preparation:
Additives used in non-shrink grouts rely on moisture to achieve
expansion and counteract shrinkage. A dry concrete substrate will
draw water out of the grout mixture and cause a weak layer to
develop at the grout member interface.

Surface preparation is of particular importance for grouts with low

water content, since a small loss of grout moisture can lead to a
brittle grout. Concrete surfaces should be wetted to a saturated
surface dry (SSD) condition prior to application of grout. SSD
conditions are achieved when the base concrete is moist;
however, there can be no standing water present.

There are common misconceptions as to how to achieve a SSD

condition. Many contractors will simply apply water to the
interface just prior to grout placement. Proper SSD conditions
usually require pre-soaking the area for a specified time. Each
manufacturer has recommended pre-soak times, which should be
followed. (Note that epoxy grouts do not require pre-soaking).

1.6.5.3 Placement Methods

Depending on the size and location of the void to be grouted several
different techniques are used for placement:

Dry Pack:
Dry pack grouting does not require the use of formwork; however,
dry packing is labor intensive and requires highly skilled workers
in order to place the grout properly. This method involves using a
very dry grout that can be balled up in the hand. Dry packing
should only be used for small voids that are easily accessible.
The process involves ramming the grout into place with tools (not
only by hand). If the space is not confined, there will be no place
to pack the grout against, which will result in loose placement and
a poor quality joint.

Pouring:
By varying the water content according to the manufacturer’s
specifications, grout can exhibit a near fluid consistency. Fluid
grouts can be poured into voids by gravity feed if there is access
to the void from the top. Placing grout by pouring requires the use
of forms and a head box to ensure containment and proper
placement. The forms should be designed to resist the hydraulic
head that will develop in the connection. Foam backer rods have
very limited resistance to significant pressure and should only be
used for very small vertical pours. Solid forms should be used for
most applications.

Pumping:

Page 1-21 Chapter 1: General Topics

 Typical pumping applications use grouts that exhibit a flowable
consistency that is stiffer than fluid consistency. Therefore, less
water can be used in the grout which will result in higher
compressive strengths. Pumping should be used for large grout
installations or areas with accessibility problems. Unlike pouring it
does not require the use of a head box. The void that is to be
grouted will need to be formed. Grout delivery tubes and air vent
tubes are also required to ensure that all voids are filled.
Pumping grout into confined pockets needs special attention to
quality control. Specifications should require trial pours in mock-
up joints. These mock-ups can be disassembled and inspected
for voids. Adjustments to air vent locations may be required after
the mock-up testing.

Post-tensioning Duct Grouting

Many details in this manual involve the use of post-tensioning (PT)
systems. Grouting of post-tensioning is a specialized field that
required quality products and expertise. Many state DOT’s have
developed standard PT grouting specifications. Users of this
manual are encouraged to contact specific DOT’s for more
information on approved PT grouting materials and methods.
Information can also be obtained at the American Segmental
Bridge Institute (ASBI) website (www.asbi-assoc.org) or from post-
tensioning material manufacturers.

1.6.5.4 Curing
There are several methods for curing cementitious grouts. The most
important factor is to follow the manufacturer’s specified curing
methods. Each particular grout manufacturer may have unique curing
characteristics that are required in order to achieve the desired grout
properties. The following curing procedures are most common:

Wet Curing:
Wet curing is used to prevent loss of surface water. During wet
curing, all exposed surfaces should be covered with continuously
wetted burlap for a specified time. Most manufacturers
recommend a minimum of three days of wet curing.

Curing Temperature:
For most grouts, the surrounding substrate should be kept at a
temperature between 40 and 90 degrees Fahrenheit for a
minimum of 24 hours during and after grouting.

Curing compounds:
Curing compounds can be applied to the exposed surface of the
grout in place of continuously wet curing. Curing compounds do
not replace wet curing, they simply reduce the amount of time
required for wet curing. Application of curing compounds can vary
by product; and therefore, it is necessary to follow the
manufacturer’s recommendations for use of curing compounds.
Typically, all surfaces should be wet cured for at least one day

Page 1-22 Chapter 1: General Topics

 before the curing compound can be applied to all surfaces.
Curing compounds for grouting should meet the requirements of
ASTM C 309, Type 2, Class B [8].

1.6.5.5 Specifications
Non-shrink cementitious grouts are sometimes simply specified as
“non-shrink grout”. However, without specifications to control material
properties the resulting product may shrink, resulting in a poor quality
connection. Therefore, it is imperative to use ASTM standards when
specifying any “non-shrink” grout. The following are a list of standard
specifications that should be used when specifying grout.

1. ASTM C 1107 - Standard Specification for Packaged Dry,

Hydraulic-Cement Grout (nonshrink) [9]
2. ASTM C 928 - Standard Specification for Packaged, Dry,
Rapid-Hardening Cementitious Materials for Concrete Repair
[10]
3. CRD C-621 – Army Corp of Engineers Specification for Non-
Shrink Grout [11]

These documents specify testing and sampling methods for grouts as

well as batching, mixing, and proportioning requirements. Grout
compressive strength is measured using two-inch square cubes in
place of test cylinders (ASTM C 109 [12]). Shrinkage is measured via
a vertical height change method. There are two methods commonly
used. ASTM C 827 [13] measures height change in the plastic state.
ASTM C 1090 [14] measures height change in the hardened state.
These standards also reference specifications for flowability,
consistency, and working time. ASTM D6449 [15] is the standard flow
cone test for flowability. This test is often the most critical for
controlling quality of flowable grouts.

Most state transportation agencies have approved non-shrink grout

product lists. During the design process of a prefabricated bridge
project, designers should carefully review each state-approved
product to see if it is appropriate for the particular connection being
used. The grouts that meet the project requirements should be clearly
specified. Designers should carefully evaluate any request from
contractors to substitute other grout materials.

1.6.5.6 Quality Control

A properly specified grout is the first step necessary to ensure a
quality final product. Quality control from the manufacturer to the
contractor can be the cornerstone of a job well done. For initial
grouting procedures and trial batching, the designer should specify
that a manufacturer’s representative be on site as the grouting
process begins. This can avoid guesswork on the part of the
contractor when it comes time to proportioning and placing materials.

Test Pours, Trial Batching and Mock-ups:

Page 1-23 Chapter 1: General Topics

 For complex void grouting, trial batching, test pours and test
mock-ups are recommended. This is especially true for large or
irregular shaped pours and pumping operations. The layout and
placement of delivery and vent tubes in large pumped grout voids
may require testing of several different layouts to achieve a quality
product. Wood mock-ups of portions of each element to be joined
can be used to test grouting procedures. After curing, the mock-
up can be dismantled and the grout void inspected. If significant
voids are found, the contractor can modify the placement of
delivery and vent tubes and repeat the test. It should be noted
that this testing procedure should be completed prior to fabricating
the precast elements to be joined since the delivery and vent
tubes are often embedded in the elements.

Grouting of Post-Tensioning Ducts

Quality control during grouting of post-tensioning ducts is critical to
a successful long lasting system. There have been several
problems with corrosion and failures of post-tensioning systems in
Florida. Improved quality control is thought to be the best
approach to eliminating these problems in the future.

The American Segmental Bridge Institute (ASBI) offers a Grouting

Certification Program that is intended to provide supervisors and
inspectors of grouting operations with the training necessary to
understand and successfully implement grouting specifications for
post-tensioned structures.

Individuals, who successfully complete the ASBI Grouting

Certification Training and have three years of experience in
construction of grouted post-tensioned structures, are certified as
“ASBI Certified Grouting Technician.” Some State DOT’s already
require this certification for grouting procedures involving post-
tensioning ducts. States that plan to employ significant post-
tensioning designs in the future should consider this program.
More information on this topic can be found at the ASBI website
(www.asbi-assoc.org).

Page 1-24 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.7 Tolerances
Tolerances can be the source of most problems in accelerated bridge
construction projects. Field fit-up is also one of the major concerns of agencies
who are considering an accelerated bridge project using prefabricated elements.
Designers of a prefabricated bridge project should assume that nothing is perfect
and that tolerance will need to be accounted for in every connection. The
following sections discuss the issues with tolerance in prefabricated bridge
elements.

1.7.1 Element Tolerances

A common misconception by designers of prefabricated bridge projects is
that the elements are built to exact dimensions. In fact, all prefabricated
elements are built to some tolerance. The designers should be aware of
the specified construction tolerances for cambers, sweep, and overall
dimensions in all elements. The locations of holes, inserts and blockouts
are also very important.

Prefabrication and accelerated bridge construction projects usually do not

need to be designed with elements having stricter tolerances than
conventional construction. The tolerances specified by the various
industries are usually sufficient. A designer of prefabricated bridges
should be familiar with the design tolerances in the states in which each
project is located and account for these tolerances in the design and
details. Consideration should also be given to whether tolerances used in
conventional construction can be increased for prefabricated construction
to ease fit-up in the field.

1.7.2 Dimensional Growth

If designers do not account for element tolerances, a phenomenon called
“dimensional growth” can occur. For example, if ten panels that are each
ten feet wide are placed side by side, the overall length of the system will
typically be greater than 100 feet. This is due to the tolerances of the
edge of the adjoining pieces. Match casting of concrete projects can
minimize this problem, but minor dimensional growth of the structure is
inevitable. To address this problem, designers should compensate for
member tolerances in the joint designs or allow for minor overall variation
in the structure dimensions.

Another form of dimensional growth has to do with the detailing of

tolerance limits for multiple protruding elements, post-tensioning ducts,
and embedded attachments. It is important to specify that the location
tolerance be measured from a common working point. If center-to-center
spacing tolerances are used, the layout error tolerance can become
additive and affect the connection of the elements.

1.7.3 Hardware Tolerances

The location of hardware in prefabricated elements can be critical to the
success of the project. Some hardware elements are more critical than
others; therefore, designers need to specify the location tolerances of all
hardware and attachments.

Page 1-25 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.7.3.1 Post-tensioning Systems
Post-tensioning systems usually require the installation of strand or
thread bars after the erection of the individual elements. It is important
to specify the tolerance of the location of the ducts, especially at the
ends of the element. Match casting is often used to keep these
tolerances to a minimum. If small grout keys or closure pours are
used, there is a greater likelihood of post-tensioning duct offset at the
joints. In this case, it is recommended that ducts be oversized to
allow for minor offsets in the duct at the joints.

1.7.3.2 Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers

Couplers require a certain degree of tolerance that is attainable in
normal precast concrete construction. One method for accounting for
tolerances is to oversize the couplers. The typical coupler can
accommodate minor variation in bar locations. It is also possible to
use an oversized coupler (by two bar sizes) to provide even greater
tolerance. This provides approximately ½ inch of tolerance
adjustment, which is well within normal tolerances for precast
elements.

Precast manufacturers can maintain the level of tolerance between

pieces by using frames and jigs as templates to position and support
the reinforcing steel and couplers. If a design requires the connection
of a precast element to a field cast portion of the bridge, it is
recommended that the precast producer provide a template jig to the
general contract to ensure proper fit-up in the field during erection.
The designer should clearly specify the responsible parties for this
approach.

1.7.3.3 Embedded Attachments

The level of tolerance for embedded attachments is a function of the
tolerance for the attaching member. If the attachment is for a utility
pipe hanger that has adjustability, then the tolerance will not be as
strict as it will be for other elements. Designers should clearly identify
the required level of tolerance for all embedded attachments.

1.7.4 Layout and Joint Widths

When grouted joints are used between elements, the layout of the
structure should be based on nominal element spacing. The actual width
of the elements should be equal to the element spacing minus the
specified joint width. The width of the joints between the elements should
be based on the maximum specified element tolerance, accounting for
member sweep, variation in overall dimensions, and variation in the side
forms. Typical joint widths range from one-half inch to one-inch
depending on the element. Larger elements tend to have larger joint
widths.

1.7.5 Closure Pours

Closure pours can allow for large construction tolerances. They are often
used to make up for dimensional growth and for unknowns in the field.

Page 1-26 Chapter 1: General Topics

 Even large match-cast structures, such as segmental bridges, use
closure pours where large portions of the bridge are joined.

1.7.6 Camber Issues

Camber tolerance is often not given enough forethought by designers in
prefabricated bridge projects. Steel and concrete beams have significant
camber tolerances. Most designers allow for camber tolerance by
requiring a variable web gap or haunch between the top of the beams and
the underside of the deck. This is recommended for prefabricated bridge
decks as well. Attempting to set prefabricated deck elements directly on
top of steel or concrete will result in numerous fit-up problems.

1.7.7 Specification Requirements

In most cases, normal specification tolerances for typical members such
as beams and girders are sufficient for prefabricated bridge projects. For
specialty elements such as deck slabs and substructure elements, the
designer should include tolerance requirements within the specifications
or the contract plans. A recommended guide for developing tolerances
for elements is the Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Manual
entitled “Tolerance Manual for Precast and Prestressed Concrete
Construction (MNL 135-00)” [16]. This manual offers recommended
tolerances for all types of precast products. Designers are also
encouraged to contact local producers to discuss appropriate tolerances.

Another approach is to use a performance type specification that requires

the contractor to determine the applicable tolerances for each element
and then be responsible for the fit-up in the field. The PCI manual could
be used as a reference in the specification.

Page 1-27 Chapter 1: General Topics

 1.8 Fabrication and Construction Issues
The basis of prefabrication is the construction or fabrication of elements off site
or near the construction site. Large-scale prefabrication raises issues not
normally encountered on typical bridge projects. Prefabricated elements are
large and heavy, requiring special means of fabrication, transport and assembly.
This section discusses fabrication and construction issues related to
prefabricated bridge projects.

1.8.1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)

Most transportation agencies have well established QA/QC procedures.
Prefabricated bridge projects can encounter different conditions that are
not typically encountered on regular bridge projects. For instance, a
contractor may choose to make portions of the bridge near the bridge site
in a temporary fabrication facility. An agency may have one set of QA/QC
procedures for field construction and a separate set of procedures for
permanent fabrication plants. A near-site temporary fabrication yard may
need special QA/QC procedures that are a combination of procedures for
site construction and plant fabrication.

1.8.1.1 Fabricator Certification

There is debate in the industry about certification of fabricators for
prefabricated bridge projects. Some states require that all elements
be fabricated by producers certified by the Precast/Prestressed
Concrete Institute. The positive side to this approach is that the
elements will be manufactured by a known source with internal quality
controls in place. The negative aspect to this approach is that all the
elements will need to be shipped from fabrication plants to the site.
This can limit the size of the elements and lead to higher costs. PCI
plant certification is recommended for complex elements such as
beams and girders. Information on the PCI Plant Certification can be
found on the PCI website (www.pci.org).

1.8.1.2 Near Site Fabrication

Several states have allowed near site fabrication. This approach is
common in the segmental bridge industry; however, it is not often
used for smaller bridges. The cost and time of setting up a certified
fabrication facility near the bridge site can be significant. One option
may be to allow prefabrication of the less complicated elements in the
field. Examples of these elements are footings, abutment and wall
stems, and pile caps. Often these elements are the heaviest
elements in the prefabricated bridge. If these elements can be
fabricated in a location that does not require shipping over roads, the
weight of the elements can be increased dramatically. It is not
uncommon to move 200-ton segmental bridge sections from a near-
site fabrication yard.

1.8.1.3 Inspection
Inspection of prefabricated bridge elements is critical. In order to
ensure the proper fit of prefabricated elements, a higher degree of
inspection will be required. Forming of concrete in the field will be
replaced by prefabricated pieces that will need to be constructed to a

Page 1-28 Chapter 1: General Topics

 specified tolerance. The success of a prefabricated bridge project will
hinge on the level of quality and accuracy of each element.

1.8.2 Handling and Shipping

1.8.2.1 Element Weight and Shipping
There are many factors that can affect the maximum size of an
individual element. The following are some of the most common
factors:

Over-the-Road Shipping Limits:

Every state has requirements for shipping of oversize and
overweight loads that can limit the permissible size of the
elements. Because designers do not know where an element will
be fabricated, investigation of possible shipping routes is not
possible. Designers should become familiar with the shipping
requirements of the state where the bridge exists, and any
neighboring states, to set reasonable limits on element size and
weight.

Designers can often facilitate shipping over the road by identifying

any deficient bridges or height and width restrictions on main
roads leading to the site. Contractors usually do not have the
time or resources to determine exact shipping routes for heavy
elements in the short time allotted for bidding. A defined access
road to the site from major highways would be beneficial to
prospective bidders.

Barge and Rail Access:

Access to the bridge site by rail and water can allow for larger
element sizes and weights. Barge access may allow large-scale
prefabrication, including the potential for total superstructure
prefabrication. Barge access should be identified in the project
plans if this option is viable. The necessary permits for the project
(environmental, Coast Guard, etc.) should identify barge access
points, anchor sites and staging areas.

Near Site Shipping:

If near-site fabrication is an option, the size of individual elements
can be increased dramatically. It may be possible to prefabricate
an entire multi-span superstructure with substructure.

Crane Capacities:
If lifting of elements is to be done by cranes, the size of the
elements may be limited. Large elements will require large cranes
that may not fit within the construction site. This is often the case
for bridge replacements where maintenance of traffic is required.
Also, the cost of large cranes can become prohibitive.

Lifting Hardware:

Page 1-29 Chapter 1: General Topics

 Normal lifting procedure for individual elements is a four-point
sling. This involves four cables attached to four discrete points on
the piece. Typically, erection engineers assume that only two of
the points are supporting the load at any time. The capacities of
lifting hardware are sometimes limited, especially if the element
being moved is a thin concrete panel. It is possible to use more
complex lifting arrangements. Designers should consult with
erection contractors for lifting of very large or heavy elements.

Use of Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMTs):

In the U.S., entire superstructure spans have been lifted, carried,
and placed in final position with SPMTs. In Europe, SPMTs have
been used to install multi-span superstructures complete with
substructures, with weights up to 3600 tons moved from near-site
staging areas.

Member Stresses During Lifting

Often precast elements are lifted from point that different than the
final support points. This can have a significant affect on the
component. This is especially true for pretensioned members that
are highly prestressed. Lifting a pretensioned beam far from the
beam end can easily overstress the beam and lead to cracking
and even failures. Non-prestressed concrete members can also
experience cracking during handling. Designers of precast
concrete components should investigate handling stresses.

It may be desirable to incorporate minor amounts of prestressing

in components that are designed with mild reinforcement in order
to minimize the potential for cracking during handling. It should be
noted that this approach will most likely increase the cost of the
component since it may need to be cast in a prestressing bed.

1.8.2.2 Recommended Design Approaches to Element Weight

Virtually all items listed in Section 1.8.2.1 are unknown to the designer
of a prefabricated bridge project. This makes the layout and size of
elements difficult, and it raises the possibility of claims from
contractors if they find that they cannot ship the elements.

One approach that has been used by the New Hampshire DOT is to
detail a schematic layout of the bridge and its elements on the plans
and to allow the contractor to determine the number of segments in an
element, for example, the number of segments in an abutment
backwall, as part of a detailed assembly plan that is submitted to the
engineer for approval. The designer notes certain limits on joint
locations, but leaves the maximum segment size and weight and the
exact location of all joints up to the contractor.

Another approach is to simply detail the bridge as a cast-in-place

bridge, and show details for typical prefabricated connections. The
contractor can then develop an assembly plan based on the geometry
of the bridge and the details provided.

Page 1-30 Chapter 1: General Topics

 By using these methods, element size and weight can be set by the
contractor to provide the most cost effective bridge, taking into
account all the factors that the designers simply do not have during
the design phase of a project.

1.8.2.3 Imperfections, Damage and Repairs

The process of fabricating, shipping and handling of elements can
lead to damage and subsequent repairs. The Precast Prestressed
Concrete Institute has recently published a document entitled “Manual
for the Evaluation and Repair of Precast, Prestressed Concrete
Bridge Products (MNL-37-06)” [17]. This document includes
information on imperfections and damage that occur from fabrication
through erection of precast concrete products. The manual is written
for typical bridge products such as girders and beams. Designers
may want to establish similar criteria for other prefabricated bridge
elements.

Steel elements tend to be easier to handle and ship without damage

than precast concrete elements. If damage occurs to a prefabricated
steel element, there are well established procedures for repair
outlined in typical project specifications, as described in the
ANSI/AASHTO/AWS Bridge Welding Code [18].

1.8.3 Constructability
Constructability can be a major factor in the development of a
prefabricated bridge plan. This is especially true for projects within tight
confines. Contractors are often required to work in limited space and time
constraints. Existing and future FHWA manuals will address these issues
in detail. The following sections are presented as an overview on
constructability.

1.8.3.1 Cranes
Crane capacities and crane footprints can have a major impact on the
constructability of a prefabricated bridge. Designers should attempt to
provide as much room as possible for crane setting locations.
Designers should also provide enough time for crane set-up and
breakdown if the cranes are to be placed in travel ways.

1.8.3.2 Self-Propelled Modular Transporters (SPMTs)

A new generation of heavy lifting equipment has been developed by
the shipping and petrochemical industries. The piece of equipment
that provides the most flexibility and speed is the Self-Propelled
Modular Transporter. SPMTs can lift very large loads and move them
in multiple directions with a high degree of accuracy. The following
photo shows the new Providence River Bridge in Providence, Rhode
Island. SPMTs were used to move this six-million-pound bridge from
a shipping pier onto two large shipping barges where it was then
shipped to the project site. The prefabrication of this superstructure

Page 1-31 Chapter 1: General Topics

 and the use of SPMT’s saved the contractor approximately one year
in construction time.

Figure 1.8.3.2-1 Providence River Bridge

(Photo Courtesy of Mammoet)

The FHWA has published a detailed manual on the use of SPMTs [3].
Designers are encouraged to review this manual to learn more about
the use of SPMTs.

1.8.3.3 Temporary Support of Elements

In a typical prefabricated bridge project, portions of the bridge may
need to be supported on temporary falsework until the bridge is
whole. Designers should account for the space needed to install
temporary supports, as well as the time required for assembly and
disassembly. In some cases, the structure will be supported in a
configuration that is quite different from the finished product. Figure
1.8.3.2-1 shows a steel arch being temporarily supported at the third
points, which had a dramatic effect on the internal stresses in the
structure. Temporary framing (vertical struts) needed to be designed
in order to keep the stresses within tolerable limits. Any structure that
is to be placed on temporary supports needs to be checked for these
temporary stresses. If the lifting method is shown on the contract
drawings, then the designer should verify the feasibility of the lifting
method. If the method is proposed by the contractor, the stresses
should be checked by the contractor’s engineer.

1.8.3.4 Time Constraints

Each prefabricated bridge project will have different time constraints.
Section 1.2.3 outlines some typical approaches to accelerated bridge
construction projects. The time constraints will affect the feasibility of
various methods of prefabrication. The designers need to develop a
structure type and prefabrication approach that can be executed
within the time constraints of the project site.

Connections play a critical role in this approach. Often the time to

develop a structural connection is a function of cure times for grouted

Page 1-32 Chapter 1: General Topics

 connections, and the time to make a welded or bolted steel
connection. The development of a connection can be the critical path
in a short duration construction project. Designers should contact
manufacturers to determine reasonable construction times for each
connection.

1.8.3.5 Assembly Plans

It is common for designers to require the submission of erection plans
for conventional construction projects. This is normally limited to the
erection of beams and girders. Bridges built with prefabricated
elements require special erection and assembly procedures due to
larger number of elements that need to be erected. The New
Hampshire Department of Transportation required the contractor to
submit an assembly plan for their first fully prefabricated bridge
project. The assembly plan is similar to an erection plan; however, it
also includes information such as grouting and grout curing
procedures, timing and sequence of construction, and temporary
shoring of substructure elements during each phase of construction.
It is recommended that projects built with prefabricated elements
contain specifications requiring the submission of a detailed assembly
plan.

Page 1-33 Chapter 1: General Topics

Page 1-34 Chapter 1: General Topics
 Chapter 2 – Superstructure Connections
This chapter is devoted to connections in superstructure systems. Superstructures are
defined by AASHTO as “Structural parts of the bridge that provide the horizontal span.”
This is a very general definition. For conventional bridges, the superstructure is often
defined as the portion of the bridge above the bridge bearings.

Integral abutments and integral piers are special bridge elements that are not clearly
identified by the AASHTO definition. An integral abutment connection is a connection
between the superstructure and the substructure. For the purpose of organizing this
Manual, the integral connection between the superstructure and the substructure has
been categorized as a superstructure connection, and is included in this chapter.

The following sections discuss typical systems of superstructure connections used on

most bridges. These systems include decks, stringers/beams, and large modular
systems.

2.1 Deck Systems

Because prefabricated decks are typically designed and constructed as complete
systems, this section is divided into common types of systems, rather than
individual connection types. Deck systems are the most commonly used for
accelerated bridge construction projects, due to several distinct advantages. First,
the conventional construction of a concrete deck (concrete is the most common
material for decks), can be very time consuming because of the significant amount
of forming required to cast the deck. Prefabrication can minimize or eliminate the
need for field forming of concrete. Second, the elements are smaller and easier to
transport and place than are most other bridge elements.

Most bridges are parallel stringer structures where the beams run parallel to the
roadway centerline. In these bridges, the deck is analyzed and designed as a one-
way slab with the strength design being in the transverse direction. In a concrete
deck, the primary strength bars run perpendicular to the bridge beam. The
reinforcement that runs parallel to the beams is used for distribution of strength.
Some structures, such as trusses and girder/floorbeam bridges, have the support
framing running perpendicular to the roadway centerline. In this case, the strength
direction is in the longitudinal direction.

The design of connections between prefabricated deck elements is largely a

function of whether the connection will be used to transfer moments and shears
caused by wheel loads (transverse reinforcement between supporting members) or
to assist with distribution (typical reinforcement parallel to supporting members).
Most systems presented in this Manual can be used in either direction; therefore,
the description of the connections will be as follows:

Strength Direction:
This is a connection used to resist forces (moments and shears) based on the
strength design of the deck element. For example: On a typical stringer bridge
with a concrete deck, the strength direction forces are resisted by the transverse
reinforcing steel in the deck.

Distribution Direction:

Page 2-1 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 This is a connection used to distribute forces laterally between elements. For
example: On a typical stringer bridge with a concrete deck, the distribution
direction forces are resisted by the longitudinal reinforcing steel in the deck.

2.1.1 Full-Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs

Full-depth precast concrete deck systems have been used by a number
of states. A group of northeast states, working as a PCI Bridge Technical
committee, has published design and detailing standards for this type of
system. In general, this system is designed as a one-way slab between
supporting beams using either mild reinforcement or prestressing.

There has been significant research [19-36] in this area; therefore, many
of the details are thoroughly tested and the behavior of the systems is
well known. Most research has focused on the connection between the
deck and the supporting beams. Composite action is a prerequisite for
most designers; therefore, this connection is critical. Most of this
research has been completed on steel beam connections, and several
studies have been completed on precast concrete beams. More research
is underway on the connection of deck slabs to concrete beams; therefore
designer should keep apprised of further work in this area.

A number of bridges built with full-depth precast concrete decks have

been in service for more than 10 years, and the performance has been
excellent. One notable bridge is the Woodrow Wilson Bridge that crosses
the Potomac River near Washington, D.C. This bridge carries Interstate
95 and is one of the most heavily traveled bridges in the country. In the
1980’s, the deck was replaced with full-depth precast lightweight concrete
slabs [37]. The Maryland DOT has noted that the deck had performed
very well under the most severe environment until it was replaced by the
new Outer Loop Bridge in the summer of 2006. Several bridges in
Connecticut were re-decked in the early 1990’s using this system. These
bridges have been in service for over 10 years and are in excellent
condition.

The following sections contain information on the typical connections

used in full-depth precast concrete deck slab systems.

2.1.1.1 Connections Between Slab Elements

There are two distinct types of element connections used between
adjacent slab elements; one in the strength direction and one in the
distribution direction:

Strength Direction:
This connection is used to transfer primary deck moment and
shear from one deck element to another. The most common
applications of the connection are to make connections between
construction stages, and to provide a cross slope change in the
deck. This is often done by placing a small cast-in-place closure
pour between the adjacent panels

Page 2-2 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Experience has shown that the need to provide a small reinforced
closure pours does not preclude the use of precast deck slabs for
accelerated construction projects. High early strength concrete
can be used to make this connection and the bridge can often be
opened to traffic in less than one day.

Distribution Direction
This connection is primarily used to transfer shear and minor
distribution moments between adjacent panels. The most
common form of this connection is a grouted shear key with
longitudinal post-tensioning placed across the key to insure that
the joint remains in compression under the worst loading
condition, which normally is a live load negative moment area.
Several agencies have experimented with joints without post-
tensioning; however, leakage through these joints has been noted.

There is on-going research into improving this connection and

possibly developing a connection that does not require post-
tensioning [22]. Post-tensioning is a slow and costly process.
Elimination of post-tensioning would further accelerate the
construction of a precast concrete deck slab system. Users of this
Manual should keep apprised of the results of this research.

Connection Design Considerations

The strength direction connection needs to be designed to transfer
the full moments and shears in the deck slab. This is important for
the performance of the deck as well as the performance of the
bridge framing below.

The design requirements for the distribution direction connection

are not as well defined. Some designers believe that the
connection only needs to transfer shear; however, many
designers understand that this connection also needs to resist
some bending moment caused by the localized effects of a wheel
load. This is the reason that post-tensioning designs are used by
many agencies.

Some guidance on these connections is available in the AASHTO

LRFD specifications. Section 9.7.5 [1] recommends that
longitudinal post-tensioning be used at mid-depth of the deck, and
that the effective prestress force not be less than 250 pounds per
square inch (psi). It should be noted that 250 psi is a net effective
value used on several successful designs. However, if a bridge is
continuous, designers should consider increasing the post-
tensioning stress over piers to overcome any tension in the deck
caused by composite dead loads. Some designers also increase
the post-tensioning to account for live load tension stresses in the
deck.

Page 2-3 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.1.1.2 Connections to Steel Beam Framing
The connection of precast concrete full-depth panels to steel beams
usually consists of a rectangular or oval pocket above the beam that
allows the installation of welded stud shear connectors after the
panels are set. Some designers prefer the oval shaped pocket to
minimize the potential for cracking in the precast panels emanating
from the corners of the pocket. The oval pockets are more expensive
to fabricate, but the additional cost is usually insignificant.

Once filled with grout, the pocket has proven to develop full composite
action. Often the pockets are tapered in the vertical direction to
provide more of a mechanical connection between the grout and the
panel.

The design of the composite action using this system is the same as
conventional shear connector design, except the spacing of the studs
needs to match the spacing of the pockets. The variation in shear
strength required is accounted for by varying the number of studs in
the pockets. The maximum spacing of the pockets is 2 feet on center,
based on requirements of Article 6.10.10.1.2 of the AASHTO
Specifications [1]. This section states:

The center-to-center pitch of shear connectors shall

not exceed 24.0 in. and shall not be less than six stud
diameters.

This provision has been in the AASHTO Bridge Design Specification

for many years, though its source is not well known. Current research
[22] has shown that the maximum spacing of shear connectors may
be increased. Typically, increasing the spacing also requires
increasing the size of the shear connectors. Users of this Manual
should keep apprised of any changes to the AASHTO Design
Specification that may result from this research.

2.1.1.3 Connections to Concrete Beam Framing

Most full-depth precast concrete deck systems have been installed on
steel framing. As stated in the previous section, the connection to
steel framing has been well researched and verified. The connection
to concrete beams is not as thoroughly researched, but several
universities have recently researched this connection [32-33]. The
approach is to use a system similar to the steel framing connection.
Hooked reinforcing steel and welded stud shear connectors projecting
from the beam have been studied. For systems with headed studs,
two options have been studied. One option is to embed a steel plate
in the beam and field weld studs in a manner similar to a steel girder
connection. There are concerns that this welding might result in
cracking of the surrounding concrete due to thermal effects. This
concern has not manifested itself in laboratory testing and in the field
on several projects. It is recommended that the thickness of the
embedded plate be kept thick in order to better disperse the heat from
the weld. Another option is to embed a headed stud directly into the

Page 2-4 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 beam. The difficulty in these systems is the location of embedded
bars or studs. The layout of these bars needs to be carefully planned
during fabrication of the beams so that the studs will line up with the
blockouts in the precast slab above.

Another option for connecting to concrete beams is to drill and grout

the connectors in the field after erection and placement of the deck
panels. Drilling into the top of a prestressed beam will not be a
problem in most cases because the prestressing steel is usually
located near the bottom of the beam.

Recent research at Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

[33] indicates that the provisions in the AASHTO Specifications for
Interface Shear Resistance are adequate for the design of projecting
reinforcing steel grouted in a pocket in a precast deck slab. The
provisions for interfaces not intentionally roughened most closely
matched the research data. This research also confirmed the validity
of a connection with welded stud shear connectors attached to an
embedded plate. In this case the AASHTO provisions for design of
welded stud shear connector was validated. Specific provisions for
the design of these connections will likely be published in the
AASHTO Design Specifications in the near future.

2.1.1.4 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings

The connection of a parapet, curb or railing to a precast concrete full-
depth deck panel needs to satisfy all the criteria for a non-
prefabricated system. FHWA requires that all parapets and railings
on the National Highway System (NHS) be crash tested. This
requirement has limited the number of prefabricated parapet and
railing connections. States may use parapets and railings designed
according to the AASHTO Specifications [1] for non-NHS projects.

Some states anchor prefabricated barriers to full depth slabs by

through bolting the barrier or railing to the deck. In this scenario, the
bolt projects down below the deck and is secured with a nut and an
anchor plate. This type of connection has been problematic. If the
bolts are placed in pre-formed holes, water can migrate through the
hole and corrode the anchor plate and the underlying framing. If this
connection is used, it should be properly sealed.

The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications [1] require that all
barriers and railing be crash tested in accordance with the
requirements outlined in NCHRP Report 350 entitled “Recommended
Procedure for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway
Features” [47]. This document is published by the Transportation
Research Board and is available for download at the Transportation
Research Board online publication website. There is at least one
proprietary precast concrete barrier that has been approved for use.
ClampcreteTM is a system that uses polyester resin anchors that are
drilled into the bridge deck. This barrier is approved for use on the

Page 2-5 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 federal highway system. Figure 2.1.1.4-1 shows the features of the
ClampcreteTM system.

Figure 2.1.1.4-1 ClampcreteTM Barrier System

Detail Courtesy of ClampcreteTM

The New York DOT has developed a static load procedure for
parapets based on the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications [1]. This
procedure is useful for testing of parapet sections that have shapes
similar to standard parapets. The test verifies the structural integrity
of the parapet, but not the vehicle impact performance. The theory is
that the reaction of the vehicle to the barrier is a function of the shape,
assuming that the barrier has close to zero deflection during impact.
If a precast parapet has a shape similar to a crash tested shape, then
only the structural integrity of that parapet needs to be evaluated.
Note that this is a New York State DOT requirement, which may not
be acceptable in other states.

The following methods have been used for this connection:

Concrete Parapets and Curbs

Most states do not have crash-tested precast parapets; therefore
a cast-in-place parapet may be the only option. However, this
does not eliminate the potential use of full-depth precast concrete
deck systems for accelerated construction projects. In
Connecticut, the construction of the parapet was expedited by
eliminating construction joints in standard concrete parapets,
allowing a full length single pour for the parapet on each span.
Using this system, the parapet was installed at a rate of 250 linear
feet per day. Some shrinkage cracking was noted; however,
these cracks were easily sealed and had no effect on the
structural integrity of the parapet.

Another option used to open the bridge to traffic as soon as

possible is to place a temporary barrier in front of the proposed

Page 2-6 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 barrier. Once the temporary barrier is secured, the construction of
the permanent parapet can proceed behind the temporary barrier
during off-peak hours.

Several states do have crash tested railings. Texas DOT has

several that have been tested to AASHTO Test Level 4. There
are also several proprietary parapet and railing systems that have
been successfully tested. Designers should refer to state DOT
standards for barriers and railings that are acceptable for use on
each project.

New Hampshire DOT and the Vermont AOT are developing a

precast open railing system. This system has a bolt down
connection that can be made quickly. The system has been static
load tested in the laboratory and installed on one bridge. Details
of this system should be available shortly from the Northeast PCI
Bridge Technical Committee Website (www.pcine.org).

Steel and Aluminum Railings

Prefabricated steel railings can be installed on a precast deck
system. The anchor bolts can either be precast into the decks or
drilled and grouted in the field. Some states drill the anchor bolts
completely through the deck and secure them with an anchor
plate and bolts. This method can lead to difficulties with alignment
of the bolts. There have also been long term maintenance issues
with through bolts because they often provide an avenue for
leakage of water through the deck. Usually steel railings are
placed on top of concrete curbs to control storm water runoff;
therefore, the discussion of casting concrete parapets and curbs
in the previous section also applies to the design of steel railings.

Some states have standard aluminum rail systems that are bolted
to concrete curbs. If these systems are use, designers should be
aware that a galvanic reaction will develop between the aluminum
and the base concrete. To avoid this, designers simply need to
place a thin (1/8” thick is common) elastomeric sheet under the
post base plate. This will disrupt the potential reaction. Type 304
Stainless steel anchor bolts should also be used for the same
reason. Aluminum railings have had a very good track record of
durability as long as these two features are incorporated into the
design.

2.1.2 Open Grid Decks

Open grid decks have been used for many years. They are most
common on bridges that require lightweight decks, such as moveable
bridges and suspension bridges. However, long term durability of
elements below the open grid decks are a concern and should be
addressed accordingly.

Grid decks are essentially mini-steel framing systems. They usually

consist of main rail members in the strength direction that span between

Page 2-7 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 supporting beams, and transverse cross bars in the distribution direction
that run parallel to the supporting beams.

This Manual includes some typical details from past projects. Users of
the Manual are encouraged to contact the Bridge Grid Flooring
Manufacturers Association for assistance with connections for specific
bridge projects (www.bgfma.org).

2.1.2.1 Connections Between Grids

Since these systems are steel framed members, the connection
between grids is usually made with a bolted or welded connection.
Bolted connections are preferred to minimize the use of fatigue prone
welded details.

2.1.2.2 Connections to Steel Framing

There are several options for connecting grids to steel framing. These
include welded, bolted or grouted shear connector pockets. Typically
the main bearing bars are connected to the supporting framing.

2.1.2.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings

No details of this type were submitted for publication in this Manual;
however, in most cases, steel railings are used due to their light
weight. Railings are typically connected to the grids using bolted
connections.

2.1.3 Concrete/Steel Hybrid Decks

These systems consist of decks that include a combination of concrete
and steel components. The most common systems involve the use of
steel grid. There are two common options for these systems, as
described below:

Partially Filled Grid Decks

These systems include a steel grid deck in which the upper
portion of the deck is filled with concrete after placement. In most
cases, the concrete is filled over the top of the grid to improve
performance

Exodermic DecksTM
An exodermic deck is a proprietary deck system that is similar to
partially filled grid decks except the concrete is primarily placed
above the grid. The main bars act as mini-composite steel beams
in concert with the concrete over pour. These decks are
lightweight and lend themselves to precast operations. The
connections used for exodermic bridge decks are similar to
precast full-depth concrete deck systems. Figure 2.1.3-1 shows
exodermic deck details and Figure 2.1.3-2 is a photograph of an
exodermic deck installation during a nighttime closure.

Page 2-8 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Figure 2.1.3-1 Exodermic Deck Details
Courtesy of the D.S. Brown Company

Figure 2.1.3-2 Exodermic Deck Installation

Photo courtesy of the D.S. Brown Company

Similar systems include the EffideckTM system developed by the Fort

Miller Company in New York. Some details provided by the New York
State DOT for this Manual are of the EffideckTM system.

Page 2-9 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 This Manual includes some typical details from past projects. Users of
the Manual are encouraged to contact the manufacturers of these
systems for guidance with connections for specific bridge projects.

2.1.3.1 Connections Between Panels

As with open grid systems, concrete/steel hybrid deck systems are
made with steel framed members. The connection between panels
can be made with bolts or welds. Bolted connections are preferred to
minimize the use of fatigue prone welded details. Grouted keys are
also used.

2.1.3.2 Connections to Steel Framing

Since the finished product of concrete/steel hybrid systems is similar
to a full-depth precast concrete deck, the connection details are also
similar. The connection is usually made with welded stud shear
connectors placed in a pocket filled with grout.

2.1.3.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings

In concrete/steel hybrid systems, connections of parapets, curbs and
railings are similar to those used in precast full-depth deck panels.
Refer to Section 2.1.1.4 for specific information on these connections.

2.1.4 Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Decks

Fiber reinforced polymers have been used in the aerospace industry for
years but have been used only recently in the bridge industry. FPR
composites can be manufactured with several different types of fibers
combined with polymer resins to form structural shapes. The choice of
fiber affects the material properties of the finished product. The most
common fibers used are glass fiber and carbon fiber. FRP can be
molded into virtually any shape by using established manufacturing
methods such as pultrusion and vacuum assisted resin transfer.

FRP products offer the following advantages over other structural

materials:
• High strength
• Lightweight
• High Stiffness to weight ratio
• Corrosion resistance
• High quality

These properties have led to the use of FRP decks on load restricted
structures. The use of FRP deck panels can have a significant effect on
the load capacity of the bridge. To date, most FRP bridge projects have
focused on decks. The relatively low modulus of elasticity of FRP
products limits their use for elements such as beams and girders. This is
not an issue with decks, since the structural spans of the elements are
very short. FRP can be molded into cellular panels that can be used as
full-depth deck panels. FRP products to date have not been

Page 2-10 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 standardized. Each project has been “one of a kind,” based on the
manufacturing process of the supplier.

FRP deck projects are not limited to the details included in this manual.
Virginia has installed three FRP decks. West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and
Delaware have also installed FRP decks. Ohio had an initiative to install
an FRP deck in each of its counties.

2.1.4.1 Connections Between Panels

The process of making FRP panels allows for development of
complex shapes and joint configurations. Interlocking panels and
male-female shear keys have been used. High quality epoxy
adhesives are used to join panels together.

2.1.4.2 Connections to Steel Framing

FRP panels can be made composite with the bridge framing.
Typically pockets are formed over the beams to allow for the
installation of welded stud shear connectors and non-shrink grout.
Bolts have also been used to connect the panels to the framing.

2.1.4.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs, and Railings

The connection of parapets and railings to FRP panels is not well
studied or documented. On several FRP bridge deck projects, the
railing was not attached to the panels. Instead, the railings were
attached directly to the steel framing below, or to the truss chords
adjacent to the panels.

New York DOT used an FRP railing that was attached to the FRP
panels using grouted reinforcing bars. The bars were grouted into
voids in the deck panels. The barrier was a hollow FRP box used to
form a reinforced concrete parapet. This project was the Route 248
Bridge over Bennett’s Creek. Details of this connection are included
in this manual.

2.1.5 Partial-Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panels

Partial-depth precast concrete deck panels have been used by many
states; for example, 85 percent of all bridges built in Texas use this
forming method [38]. These panels are typically 3.5 to 4 inches thick and
placed on top of the beams on interior bays. The typical details used in
Texas can be found at the Texas DOT Website (www.state.tx.us).
Overhangs on bridges with these panels are usually formed using
conventional forming methods. The panels have not been cantilevered
over the fascia beam because normally the design requires a composite
connection between the beam and the deck. A continuous deck panel
interferes with this connection. In the past the Texas DOT experimented
with a system that used blockouts for shear connectors, but has since
decided that it is easier to simply form the overhangs using conventional
deck forming techniques.

Page 2-11 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Once placed, a top layer of conventional reinforcing is placed over the
panels and a partial-depth concrete pour is made to finish the composite
deck.

These deck panels serve two purposes:

1. They act as a form to support the wet concrete of the deck pour. The
slowest portion of reinforced concrete deck construction is the
installation of deck formwork. On a conventional bridge, this is
accomplished using wood forms or steel stay-in-place forms. These
forms need to be fit between the beam flanges within tight tolerances.
The precast concrete panels span between the beams and are
supported temporarily on bedding strips on top of the flanges until the
deck concrete flows underneath them to provide continuous support;
therefore, installation is faster and requires less manufacturing
tolerance.
2. The deck panels also act as the lower portion of the reinforced
concrete deck. This is possible because the moment demand in a
deck is primarily positive bending in the middle portion of the bay
between beams, and negative bending over the beams. Having a
discontinuity over the beams between the panels is not an issue
because the moment demand is resisted by the top reinforcing in the
cast-in-place top pour.

Research has been completed on partial-depth deck panels. The Texas

DOT has sponsored much of this research [39]. There have been
laboratory studies and field verification. Strength tests and cyclic live load
tests have also been completed. The results of this research show the
following:
• Decks composed of precast panels topped with cast-in-place
concrete are stronger and stiffer than full-depth cast-in-place
concrete decks [40].
• The panels can be considered a part of the structural deck
system.
• Composite action between the panels and the topping
concrete is possible without the use of horizontal shear
reinforcement.
• The panels combined with the concrete topping can be used
as a composite deck for the design of the beam.
• It is preferred to use prestressing as the main reinforcement in
the panels.
• The amount of force and the size of the prestress strand
should be kept as low as possible to minimize cracking and
the development requirements of the strand.

Texas and Tennessee have had good performance on their decks where
partial-depth precast concrete decks panels have been used. The key to
good performance is a positive support between the panels and the top of
the girders. Other States have experience problems with the panels
where fiber board was used to support the panels and which deteriorated
over time or where there was not a positive support between the panels

Page 2-12 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 and the girders. Flexibility of the superstructures should also be taken
into consideration. Virginia has experienced significant reflective cracks
on flexible steel structures with span lengths greater than 140 feet.
These reflective cracks can affect the long term durability of the deck,
particularly where deicing chemicals are used.

2.1.5.1 Connection to Steel Beam Framing

The connection between partial-depth precast concrete deck panels
and steel beam framing is made using welded stud shear connectors
in the gap between adjacent panels. This area is filled with concrete
as the deck topping concrete is placed.

There is one key feature of this connection that most states strictly
adhere to; the deck panel should have concrete bedding placed
between the underside of the deck panel edge and the beam below to
provide continuous support for the panels to resist live loads. Earlier
installations did not use this concrete bedding and excessive cracking
occurred above this connection.

Some states require that the prestressing strand in the panels be

extended into the area over the beams. This was done to improve the
connection of the panel to the beam. Research has shown that these
extensions have no affect on the structural integrity of the connection;
therefore, many states allow a smooth edge on the panel [40]. This
greatly simplifies the production of these panels and has led to
reduced costs.

Grade control is often accomplished by stacking shims under the

panels. The shim heights are predetermined following a beam grade
survey. Several states use leveling screws embedded in the panel
that can be adjusted after installation. These screws are temporary
and are removed after grout is placed between the panel and the
beams.

2.1.5.2 Connections to Concrete Beam Framing

This connection is almost identical to the steel beam framing
connection discussed in Section 2.1.5.1. The only difference is that
the composite action is made with standard shear reinforcement
extending from the beam into the deck. The same issues noted in
Section 2.1.5.1 are applicable to this connection.

2.1.5.3 Joints Between Panels

The partial-depth precast concrete deck panels are usually
prestressed in the strength direction. The joint between the panels
over the beams is essentially a compression connection since it is in
the compression zone of the negative moment section of the deck.
The cast-in-place concrete simply transfers compression forces
between adjacent panels.

The joints in the distribution direction are simply butted in the field with
slight gaps. The connection between the panels is made via the

Page 2-13 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 concrete topping and topping reinforcing. Even with these small gaps
between panels, full composite beam action of the entire bridge deck
(precast plus topping) is achieved.

2.1.6 Timber Deck Panels

The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Products Laboratory
(USDA FPL) has developed standard details for timber bridges, including
details for prefabricated timber panels and beams. There is a significant
amount of information on timber bridges at the USDA FPL website. At
this time, most timber bridges are used on low volume roadways, but may
be applicable to higher volume roads as well. Users of this Manual are
encouraged to visit the Forest Products Laboratory website for more
information on timber bridges (www.fpl.fs.fed.us).

Prefabricated timber beams and panels are normally manufactured using

the glue laminating process. This involves gluing nominal dimension
lumber side-by-side to create a solid panel. For beams, the wide
dimension of the laminations is normally placed horizontal. For deck
panels, the wide dimension of the laminations is typically placed vertical.
Protection against rotting is controlled by the use of pressure treated
wood products. The individual laminations can be pressure treated
before being laminated together, or the laminated pieces can be pressure
treated after fabrication. The glue used for bridge application must be
water proof.

Timber deck panels have be used in two ways:

• Installed on top of glue laminated wood beams
• Installed on top of steel stringers
• Installed as adjacent-deck-slab superstructure for short span
bridges

The following sections contain information on the first two uses. The third
use is discussed in Section 2.2.4.

2.1.6.1 Connection Between Panels

The connection between wood deck panels is used to transfer shear
between the panels. Earlier versions of this system used only steel
dowels placed mid-depth between the panels. This system proved to
be problematic for higher volume roadways, especially when a
bituminous wearing surface was employed. The connections would
eventually loosen, leading to cracking of the pavement and leakage
through the joints.

The current details include a load transfer beam placed at mid-bay

between the support stringers. This beam provides a more significant
shear transfer mechanism. Even with this connection, reflective
cracking can occur in the overlay pavement. For this reason, it is
recommended that a layer of geotextile fabric be installed between the
pavement and the panels.

2.1.6.2 Connections to Framing

Page 2-14 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 The currently used connections of timber deck panels to beam
framing are not intended to provide composite action between the
beams and the deck, but rather, simply to keep the deck in place over
the beams. The system consists of bolts and brackets that connect
the deck panels to the beams.

2.1.6.3 Connections of Parapets, Curbs and Railings

The UDSA FPL has developed crash tested parapet details for some
timber bridges. The most common details are for stress laminated
timber deck bridges. These details have been crash tested for
AASHTO Test Level 2 and 4 and are available at the USDA FPL
website. Two Railing Details have also been developed for glue
laminated timber deck systems that meet the requirements of
AASHTO Test Level 2. Users of this Manual are encouraged to
contact the USDA FPL for guidance on these connections.

2.1.7 Grouting Techniques for Deck Systems

Many of the systems described in this chapter make use of grout for the
connections. Section 1.6.5 in this Manual contains information on grout
materials and placement. There are four major uses of grouts in deck
systems, as described below.

2.1.7.1 Joint Grouting

Most joints between panels contain a grouted shear key. It is very
important that the grout placed in these keys completely fills the void.
The most common form of keyway failure is due to inadequate filling
of the keys. If voids are present, the mechanical interlock of the key is
lost. Project specifications should require the use of flowable grouts.
Another method of placement that has proven successful requires
minor rodding of the grout after placement.

2.1.7.2 Shear Connector Pocket Grouting

These grout areas are used to make the deck composite with the
beam framing. In most cases, the pockets are exposed on the top of
the deck; therefore placement of the grout is a simple process.

There is on-going research (not yet published) at the Virginia

Polytechnic Institute & State University that has looked into the issues
with grouting of shear connector pockets. They have found that
certain grouts can shrink slightly; thereby creating minor shrinkage
cracks around the perimeter of the pocket. The cracking was not
found to be detrimental to the structural capacity of the connection,
but water leakage was a concern. These cracks can be easily sealed
with methacralate crack sealers. In lieu of this, Most states that use
this system overlay the deck with either a bituminous wearing surface
combined with a waterproofing membrane, or a thin concrete overlay.
Other states have tried thin polymer overlays. Use of overlays will
eliminate the need to seal these cracks. The overlay also dramatically
improves the riding surface quality of the deck.

Page 2-15 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 A new blind pocket system was recently developed as part of and
NCHRP research project. The grout for these blind pockets needs to
be pumped through small ports in the top of the deck [22]. This
process is similar to grouting post-tensioning ducts.

2.1.7.3 Post-Tensioning Duct Grouting

Many states have standard specifications for this process. It is critical
that whichever specification is followed, the specifications are followed
precisely in the field. The grout is used to provide corrosion protection
to the post-tensioning system and to provide a bond between the
strand and the surrounding concrete. Elimination of voids and bleed
water are two important issues that need to be addressed with any
specification or construction process. Normally grouting starts at the
low end of the deck and bleed water ports are placed at the high end
of the deck. See Section 1.6.5.6 for more information on grouting of
post-tensioning ducts.

The connection of the ducts between panels is typically done using a

simple duct splice with duct tape. Some states have used heat shrink
wraps as well; however this may not be possible with polyethylene
ducts, and it may be difficult to get the heat all the way around the
duct in the limited pocket areas.

2.1.7.4 Bedding Under Deck Panels

Typically a gap is used between the underside of concrete bridge
decks and the top of the supporting beams to account for tolerances
such as beam camber. This gap needs to be filled with grout so that
the panels have continuous support for wheel loads. In order to
properly fill these thin gaps, a flowable grout will likely be needed.
Some states have specified dry pack grouting in this area. This can
be done, but it is very labor intensive. It is recommended that dry
pack grouting only be used for repair to voids in poured areas.

Contractors have used several forming techniques for this area.

Some states have specified compressible foam forms. It is
recommended that the contract details not include a forming
technique, since it is part of the contractor’s mean’s and methods.

2.1.8 Grade Control and Tolerances

Most deck systems are installed on bridges that have precise grade
requirements. The deck panels are required to follow the grade of the
road.

Pretensioned concrete beams are cast in flat forms. Upon release of the
prestressing strand the beams will camber up due to the eccentricity of
the prestressing force with respect to the centroid of the beam. It is also
common for bridges to be built on vertical curves. These two parameters
lead to the fact that the distance between the top of the beam and the
underside of the deck will vary along the beam length. Steel beams and
glue laminated wood beams are often fabricated to match the grade of

Page 2-16 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 the proposed roadway; however, tolerances on beam camber still need to
be accounted for.

These issues lead to a common detail where the gap between the top of
the beam and the underside of the deck will vary along the beam length.
This brings about a need to adjust the elevation of deck panels as they
are placed. Many states use some sort of leveling device embedded in
the deck panels. The most common device is a leveling bolt system.
These devices serve two purposes. First, they allow for vertical field
adjustment as the deck panels are being placed. Second, they provide
temporary bearing for the panel and the proper distribution of the panel
weight to the beams. To ensure proper dead load distribution, some
agencies require that the torque on the leveling devices be within a
specified range. Usually, the torque on bolts is specified to vary by no
greater than 20 percent [41]. This has proven to be a reasonable range
to obtain in the field. Once the grout is placed between the panels and
the beams, the bolts are typically removed, thereby using the grout to
distribution dead loads and live loads to the beams.

Tolerances for prefabricated elements are discussed in Section 1.7.

Deck systems normally have nominal width joints between the panels;
therefore, most tolerances can be handled in the joint. Precast concrete
deck systems are often post-tensioned together in the field. The
tolerance on the location of the PT ducts is usually the most critical
dimension in the element. Designers should specify smaller tolerances
for these systems. The tolerance should be based on the post-tensioning
manufacturer’s recommendations. Another option to specifying tight
tolerances on the PT duct is to oversize the duct so that minor
misalignments will not lead to binding of the PT system in the duct. Care
should be taken to maintain cover over the larger ducts.

2.1.9 Evaluation of Performance and Long-Term Durability of

Prefabricated Deck Systems

2.1.9.1 Reflective Cracking and Leakage

Most prefabricated deck systems have performed very well.
However, there have been minor problems with reflective cracking
through overlays and leakage through joints. The primary causes of
these problems were identified as:

Poor Joint Configurations:

Some early systems (not included in this Manual) used joints that
were not grouted. Early timber deck systems used simple dowels
at transverse joints. These dowels eventually loosened and
allowed the panels to work independently (piano key action). This
eventually led to pavement cracking and leakage. The addition of
a stiffening beam at mid-span may improve this connection.
Several stiffening beams at regular intervals would be preferred.

Lack of Post-Tensioning:

Page 2-17 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 There have been several attempts to construct distribution joints
without post-tensioning. While these joints are primarily used to
transfer shear between panels, there is some moment demand,
which leads to cracking and leakage

Reflective Cracking in Concrete Topping Over Partial-Depth Deck

Panels:
Reflective cracking in the concrete topping over the transverse
joints is not uncommon. Research has shown that this cracking is
not a structural deficiency, even under cyclic load testing. Texas
research has shown that this cracking is less than occurs in full-
depth cast-in-place concrete decks under comparable live loads.
Serviceability is a concern, since the cracks are on the top surface
of the deck, especially in states that use de-icing chemicals.
Some states that use exposed concrete decks use surface sealers
to fill these cracks. Other states use membrane waterproofing
systems combined with overlays; therefore, the cracks are
covered by these systems.

2.1.9.2 Riding Surface Issues

Prefabricated bridge deck systems are composed of discrete
elements connected in the field. Many systems are also made
composite with the bridge framing. This design requires joints and
shear connector pockets exposed to the top surface of the deck.

Even with the best grouting practices, the top of the deck can be
rough when compared to conventional concrete deck placement
techniques. Most projects that employ these systems include some
form of deck overlay to provide the final wearing surface, which
dramatically improves the ride quality. Common systems include
waterproofing membrane with bituminous pavement or thin concrete
overlays. Most states that use bituminous overlays specify 2½” to 3”
pavement thicknesses placed in two lifts (thicker overlays have been
used in Europe and Japan). The bottom layer is typically a small
aggregate mix that will not damage the membrane during placement
and compaction. The two layers of asphalt provide better protection
to waterproof membrane and minimize any damage to the membrane
when the top layer of asphalt is milled off for pavement rehabilitation.

Several states are attempting to develop full-depth precast concrete

deck systems that do not need overlays. One approach uses shear
connector pockets that are hidden from the top of the deck. The
pockets are formed on the underside of the deck and grouted through
small grout ports on the top. Early research results show that this
system is viable [22]. There has also been discussion about diamond
grinding the deck surface at the end of construction to provide a
smooth surface, though this approach has yet to be employed on a
bridge.

Some states use thin epoxy overlays on prefabricated deck systems.

This approach is most effectively employed on bridges with load

Page 2-18 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 capacity restrictions. Thin overlays have historically been subject to
debonding and peeling. Careful surface preparation is critical to
ensure successful performance of thin overlays.

2.1.10 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

Timelines for construction depend on the weather and site-specific factors
such as access, traffic control, and locations for cranes and storage.
Nonetheless, it is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction
time for the various systems discussed in this section.

Often prefabricated decks are used for replacement of old deteriorated

decks. In this case, removal of the old deck can be a significant time
constraint, especially if the old deck is composite with the beams.
Removal of non-composite decks can be done by carefully prying the
deck from the beams. Using this method, a non-composite deck on a
single span can be removed in a few hours.

Removal of composite decks required significant labor, especially over

the tops of the beams. The size of pneumatic hammers should be limited
over the beams to less than 50 pounds so that the top of the beams do
not get significantly damaged. Minor flange damage is normally
acceptable in positive moment regions. Damage to steel flanges in
negative moment regions (notches and gouges) should be repaired by
grinding since this may result in future fatigue cracking.

Hydro demolition of the concrete over the beams may also be feasible;
however control of the waste water may be difficult. Contractors have
demonstrated the ability to remove a composite deck on a typical span
(100’+) in approximately 8 hours. This means that replacement of a
composite deck during an overnight closure is not feasible; however
weekend replacements are reasonable and have been done successfully
on numerous projects.

Table 2.1.10-1 contains approximate installation times for the various

deck systems included in this section:

Page 2-19 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 System Minimum Comments
Installation
Time*
Full-depth precast 2 days per This includes longitudinal post-
concrete deck span tensioning and closure pours.
panels Deck replacements have been
completed during a single weekend
closure.
Open Grid Decks 1 Day The lack of post-tensioning needs
for these systems can lead to very
fast installation
Concrete/Steel 2 Days Some of these systems are similar
Hybrid Decks to full-depth precast decks. They
require grouting in order to make
the connection to the beam framing
FRP Deck Panels 2 Days Adhesive connections and grouting
are the major installation tasks
Partial-Depth 7 Days The panels install quickly (1 day);
Precast Deck however, placement of the top mat
Panels of reinforcement and concrete is
needed to complete the deck
Timber Deck 1 Day This system is simple and requires
Panels no grouting or post-tensioning.
Table 2.1.10-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Deck
Systems

* Times shown are for single spans. Multiple spans can be completed if multiple
crews are used.

2.1.11 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

Many decks included in this section are successful and proven systems.
Nonetheless, some factors could be improved, as discussed below:

Elimination of Post-Tensioning:
Distribution connections for deck panel systems are typically
made with post-tensioning because this connection experiences
some moment demand. However, the post-tensioning of the deck
(including duct grouting) is one of the slowest tasks in the deck
installation process. If post-tensioning could be eliminated, the
speed of installation could be improved. Deck removal and
replacement projects can currently be completed in as little as two
days. Elimination of the post-tensioning task could make it
possible to remove and replace a bridge deck in a single night.

Corrosion of the post-tensioning anchorage assemblies is a

concern. If the assembly is placed at the extreme end of the deck,
it may be exposed to corrosion attack from leaking joints.

Page 2-20 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Designers should look into casting a small closure pour between
the end of the last precast panel and the bridge joint in order to
properly protect this area.

Another issue with post-tensioning in bridge decks is the effect of

long term creep of the panels. This phenomenon results in a loss
of post-tensioning force and a transfer of stress into the supporting
beams. There is on-going research (not yet published) at the
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University on this subject.

There has been research involving the development of transverse

deck connections that do not use post-tensioning [22]. One of the
decks studied in this research has been constructed by Texas
DOT and is included in this manual. The early results of this
research are promising. Users of this Manual should keep
apprised of the further development of these systems.

2.1.12 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Deck Systems

The following pages contain data sheets for various details used in
prefabricated deck systems. This information was primarily gathered
from agencies that have developed and used the systems. Some
systems were obtained from manufacturers and industry groups. Most
data in the sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors added
text when an agency did not supply all requested information. The owner
agencies also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2

Page 2-21 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 2-22 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.1 A

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panel to Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panel

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-23 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The Boone County IBRC Project utilized full depth precast concrete deck panels on precast pretensioned concrete beams. The precast panels
were joined transversely by a keyway cast into each precast panel. The diamond shaped keyway was filled with a early high strength, low
shrinkage concrete mix. The transverse joints were later compressed during longitudinal post-tensioning of the bridge deck.

The keyway included a small quantity of concrete and was cast in cold weather. This small quantity required blankets to keep the concrete
insulated from the cold to allow for proper curing.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Once Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-24 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.1 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Precast full depth slab

Name of Project where the detail was used I-84/Rt 8 Interchange, Waterbury, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Note A:
The variation is due to sweep and camber of the slabs. The designer shall add the following note to the plans. "The slabs shall be
placed at the nominal spacing shown on the plans with a 1/4" wide gap between the slabs. The width of the gap can vary due to
tolerances of the slabs"

Note B:
The designer shall add the following note to the plans. "Grout for shear keys shall be rodded or vibrated to ensure that all voids in
the shear keys are filled"

Page 2-25 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection between two full depth precast concrete slabs. This connection has primarily been used as a transverse joint (stringer bridges). This
detail is typically used in conjunction with longitudinal post-tensioning. Some states have used this detail without PT however there have been
problems with leakage. A PT level of 250 psi (concentric) is recommended.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 4 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-26 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.1 C

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Precast full depth slab

Name of Project where the detail was used I-84/Rt 8 Interchange, Waterbury, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-27 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection between two full depth precast concrete slabs. This connection is used in conjunction with a grouted shear key. It is very important to
seal this connection, since the PT is pulled after the grout has been placed. There have been problems with pushing the PT strand through if the the
maximum size and number of strand are used. The ducts should be oversized for the intended PT strand. Tight tolerances should be specified for
the location of these ducts. The duct should also be tied to a rebar in order to maintain its alignment during casting.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 6 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-28 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.1 D

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Precast full depth slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 8 Viaduct, Seymour, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-29 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Connection between two full depth precast concrete slabs. This connection was used to account for the crown of the bridge deck. This connection
can also be used for stage construction joints. High early concrete was specified. This connection was constructed in one day and opened to traffic
the next day.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-30 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.1.1.1 E

Contact Name: Nicolas A. Choubah Phone Number: (845) 431-7924

Address: Regional Structures Group E-mail: [email protected]
4 Burnett Blvd.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Deck Slab to Precast Deck Slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Replacement of I-287 Viaduct over the Bronx River Parkway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-31 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Precast post-tensioned slabs were used to speed up the construction. The design was based on providing minimal tension in deck slab. It is a
good option for viaducts with steel box girders.

The detail shown is the transverse joint between adjacent slabs. The connection is post-tensioned longitudinally. The longitudinal post tensioning
was staggered with anchorages at various locations throughout the span in order to control the stresses in the slab. The anchorage detail shows an
anchorage away from the deck end.

An overall view of the system is shown below.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1997 Condition at last inspection (if known) Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 3 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-32 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.1 F

Contact Name: Michael Hyzak Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Full Depth Deck Panel to Precast Full Depth Deck Panel

Name of Project where the detail was used Live Oak Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-33 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This is believed to be the first use of the details developed and tested under NCHRP Project 12-65. The results of this research are available in
NCHRP Report 584 entitled "Full Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panel Systems" authored by Sameh S. Badie at George Washington
University and Maher K. Tadros at the University of Nebrask-Lincoln.

Features of the connection:

1. Longitudinal post-tensioning is not required to connect the deck panels in the field. Short reinforcing bars are placed in
reinforced blockouts and grouted in place.
2. The bridge is a multi-span non-continuous structure, however the deck panels were run continuouis over the beam
to create a continuous deck. This approach is taken on many Texas bridges. Minor cracking is expected over the beam
ends, whcih is acceptable in the arid environment.
3. A 1/4" thick sacrificial surface is cast in the panel so that grinding of the deck after installation is possible.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2008 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-34 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State D.O.T. Detail Number 2.1.1.1 G

Contact Name: Eric Ferluga Phone Number: 360-705-7179

Address: Bridge and Structures Office E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 47340
Olympia, WA 98504-7340 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth to Precast full depth

Name of Project where the detail was used US 101 ~ Nolan Creek Vic. Bridge and Realignment

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-35 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This project consisted of an option to use full depth 8" precast deck panels with a 2" ACP overlay (instead of a 9" C.I.P. concrete deck).

This option was included because of the remoteness of the site. Procedure is as follows:
- place and level panels (see other details)
- place duct couplers and grout transverse joints
- post-tension strand starting at bridge centerline and alternating each side of centerline
- grout shear connector blockouts (see other details) and post-tensioning ducts
- grind deck areas with relief of greater than ¼", construct barriers and place overlay

20 ducts were used with one strand per duct spaced at 1'-6".

The precast deck option was not chosen by the contractor on this project, however the details may be used on future projects.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known) N/A
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 6 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 6 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 6 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-36 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Colorado DOT Detail Number 2.1.1.1 H

Contact Name: T. Mashesha Phone Number: 303-757-9352

Address: 4201 East Arkansas Avenue E-mail:
Room 330
Denver, CO 80222-3400 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Deck Slab to Precast PT Tub Girders

Name of Project where the detail was used Richmond Road over US285

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-37 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The connections between the precast slabs were made by using the reinforced concrete closure pour shown. They did have fit up problems with
the precast panels because the projecting tie bars conflicted with the adjacent panels. These bars had to be bent in the field (see photo). The
contractor also had difficulty feeding the transverse #5 bars in the closure pour between the two panels due to conflicts with the PT Dects (see
photo); therefore prestress strand was used as a subsitute. The prestress strand should have been coated. The joint was filled with self
consolidating concrete (SCC). Initially the SCC leaked through the forms. Subsequent pours were sealed properly.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension x Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2007 Condition at last inspection (if known) N/A (new construction)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 5 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-38 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.1 I

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panel to Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panel

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-39 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The Boone County IBRC Project had a out to out deck deck width of 33'-2". This deck was made up of two full depth precast deck panels
measuring 16'-1" wide with a 1' wide longitudinal joint running down the centerline of the bridge. The precast panels included #5 bar double hoops
extending from each panel into the joint. Four #5 bars where then placed longitudinally in the joint. The joint was then formed and cast-in-place
with a high early strength concrete with low shrinkage characteristics.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Once Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-40 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.1 J

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected P/C Slab Connection For Stage Construction to Steel Girder Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 7 over Route 50, 7 Corners

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-41 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The existing composite concrete deck is replaced in 3 stages. In each stage, a portion of the transverse section is removed and replaced the full
length of the bridge, while two traffic lanes are allowed on the bridge during the replacement. A total of 18 different panel shapes were designed to
fit the 3 construction stages and the skewed ends of the deck slab, while conforming to the weight limit for transportability and constructability (10
tons). A typical panel is 10' in longitudinal direction of the bridge (direction of traffic) and its width varies depending on the stage of construction.
Light weight concrete (110 lb/cy) is used in fabrication of the panels to compensate for the additional weight of the overlay.

Project Requirements for Precast Construction

The project requirements included the following: 1.)Construction operations shall be conducted in such a manner that all lanes on the bridges are
open to traffic from 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 2.)During construction (i.e., 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m.) the bridges shall be partially open to traffic at all times.
3.)Weight of the precast concrete panels shall be limited to 10 tons to avoid special shipping and constructability requirements. 4.) Joints between
precast panels shall be watertight. 5.)The bridge decks shall be overlaid to provide smooth ride over the precast panel joints. 6.)Joints between
precast panels shall not reflect through the overlay. 7.)The dead load of the bridge deck (including overlay) shall not be higher than the dead load of
the existing deck. 8.)The bridge deck shall be made composite with the existing steel framing.

Panel Continuity Across Longitudinal Joints

The two longitudinal joints between the three construction stages are oriented over girders to minimize shear forces at the panel longitudinal joints.
The negative moment transfer at the longitudinal joints is provided by spliced top transverse bars embedded in a 3' strip of partial depth, high-early-
strength, cast-in-place concrete.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) (7) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-42 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.1 K

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected P/C Slab Longitudinal Connection to Steel Girder Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 7 over Route 50, 7 Corners

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-43 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The existing composite concrete deck is replaced in 3 stages. In each stage, a portion of the transverse section is removed and replaced the full
length of the bridge, while two traffic lanes are allowed on the bridge during the replacement. A total of 18 different panel shapes were designed to
fit the 3 construction stages and the skewed ends of the deck slab, while conforming to the weight limit for transportability and constructability (10
tons). A typical panel is 10' in longitudinal direction of the bridge (direction of traffic) and its width varies depending on the stage of construction.
Light weight concrete (110 lb/cy) is used in fabrication of the panels to compensate for the additional weight of the overlay.

Project Requirements for Precast Construction

The project requirements included the following: 1.)Construction operations shall be conducted in such a manner that all lanes on the bridges are
open to traffic from 5:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. 2.)During construction (i.e., 9:00 p.m. to 5:00 a.m.) the bridges shall be partially open to traffic at all times.
3.)Weight of the precast concrete panels shall be limited to 10 tons to avoid special shipping and constructability requirements. 4.) Joints between
precast panels shall be watertight. 5.)The bridge decks shall be overlaid to provide smooth ride over the precast panel joints. 6.)Joints between
precast panels shall not reflect through the overlay. 7.)The dead load of the bridge deck (including overlay) shall not be higher than the dead load of
the existing deck. 8.)The bridge deck shall be made composite with the existing steel framing.

Panel Continuity Across Transverse Joints

Continuity across the transverse joints is accomplished by providing a post-tensioned, grouted shear key. High-early-strength grout is used in the
shear key. The gap at the bottom of shear key compensates for the dimensional tolerance of the panels. Post-tensioning provides 200 psi
compression at the transverse joint. This amount of compression is sufficient for simple span bridges, since the deck is under compression from
superimposed dead loads and live loads. The post-tensioning strands run along oblong ducts placed at mid-depth of the panels. The ducts are
spliced at each transverse joint in small blockouts. Each post-tensioning duct utilizes three 0.6- inch diameter, seven wire, low relaxation strands
with an ultimate tensile strength of 270 ksi. After post-tensioning, the ducts are pressure grouted and the blockouts are filled with the high-early-
strength concrete.

To further improve shear transfer, welded sliding shear plates are installed across each transverse joint.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) (7) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2008
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-44 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.2 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to steel beam

Name of Project where the detail was used I-84/Rt 8 Interchange, Waterbury, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-45 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection of a full depth precast concrete slab to a steel beam. This detail can be used for stringer beams or floorbeams. This connection was
used very effectively on two successful projects. It is important that the shear studs be installed after slab erection. Reinforcing in the slab needs to
be adjusted to avoid the blockouts. The design is the same as a cast-in-place slab shear connector. Spacing of blockouts is usually kept to 24" on
center. Blockouts have been built with both rounded and square corners. Rounded corners are preferred in order to minimize potential for cracking.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 4 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-46 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.2 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Steel Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used I-84/Rt 8 Interchange, Waterbury, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-47 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is used to control grade during installation and to properly distribute the slab dead load to each stringer. Two bolts should be placed on
each beam or stringer. Specifications should indicate that the torque of each bolt should all be within 20% of each other so that the dead load is
relatively uniform. The details shown allows for removal of the bolt after the grout in the beam haunch has set. The contractor should be allowed to
substitute alternate details; however they should be adjustable and should be able to transmit the dead load evenly to each beam below.

This detail should be used in conjunction with grouted shear connector pockets (see details in Section 2.1.1).

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-48 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.2 C

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Steel end diaphragm

Name of Project where the detail was used I-84/Rt 8 Interchange, Waterbury, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-49 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This connection was used to account for field adjustability, accomodate the deck expansion joint, and make a composite connection to the steel end
diaphragm. High early concrete was specified. This connection was constructed in one day and opened to traffic the next.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 5 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 5 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-50 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State D.O.T. Detail Number 2.1.1.2 D

Contact Name: Eric Ferluga Phone Number: 360-705-7179

Address: Bridge and Structures Office E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 47340
Olympia, WA 98504-7340 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth deck to Steel Girder

Name of Project where the detail was used US 101 ~ Nolan Creek Vic. Bridge and Realignment

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-51 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This project consisted of an option to use full depth 8" precast deck panels with a 2" ACP overlay (instead of a 9" C.I.P. concrete deck).

This option was included because of the remoteness of the site. Procedure is as follows:
- grout stops are placed along girder flanges, place precast deck panels
- adjust leveling bolts to achieve profile and install shear connectors
- construct transverse joints and post tension (see other details) then grout shear connector blockouts
- grind deck, construct traffic barriers and overlay deck

Shear connectors are spaced at 1'-6" o.c. and there are 6 leveling bolts per panel (2 per girder).

Slab reinforcing is adjusted to miss blockouts.

The precast deck option was not chosen by the contractor on this project, however the details may be used on future projects.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known) N/A
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-52 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.1.1.2 E

Contact Name: Nicolas A. Choubah Phone Number: (845) 431-7924

Address: Regional Structures Group E-mail: [email protected]
4 Burnett Blvd.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Deck Slab to Steel Box Girder

Name of Project where the detail was used Replacement of I-287 Viaduct over the Bronx River Parkway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-53 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Precast post-tensioned slabs were used to speed up the construction. The design was based on providing minimal tension in
deck slab. It is a good option for viaducts with steel box girders.

The detail shown is the connection between the slab and the steel box girder. Up to 12 studs were installed per blockout. The
spacing of the blockouts was 2’-6” in order to minimize interference with the transverse and longitudinal post-tensioning ducts.

An overall view of the system is shown below.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1997 Condition at last inspection (if known) Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 3 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-54 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.2 F

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected P/C Concrete Slab to Steel Girder Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 7 over Route 50, 7 Corners

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-55 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Panels Elevation Adjustment
The top of panel elevations are adjusted by a leveling bolt system. Each panel has 4 bolts threaded through cast-in-place sockets. These bolts
temporarily bear on the existing girders and are adjusted by a wrench. After positioning the panel, the haunch between the panel and girder is built
with a high-early-strength concrete. The high-early-strength concrete is a latex-modified concrete that gains 3,000 psi compressive strength in 3
hours sufficient to allow traffic on the bridge. The strength in 24 hours is 6,000 psi.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) (7) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2008
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 5 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-56 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.2 G

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected P/C Concrete Slab to Steel Girder Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 7 Over Route 50, 7 Corners

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-57 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Composite Action

The panels have shear stud blockouts located over the girders. Composite action is provided by studs welded to the girders in these blockouts.
The blockouts have a tapered wall to prevent uplift of the panel, and they are filled with the high early strength concrete. It should be noted that the
shear stud blockouts are filled after post-tensioning, to prevent exerting positive moments onto superstructure from post-tensioning.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) (7) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? >1 Year of last inspection 2008
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 5 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-58 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.3 A

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panel to Precast Concrete Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-59 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The Boone County IBRC Project utilized full depth precast concrete deck panels sitting on precast pretensioned concrete beams. The beams were
cast with stirrup steel extending from the top flanges of the beams. The precast panels were fabricated longitudinal openings measuring 10" across
where the panels intersected the beams. Reinforcing steel from the panels extended across the voids. The panels were placed in the beams and
raised to the proper elevation using leveling devices that the contractor created. Once leveled, the beam haunches were formed and deck panels
post-tensioned together utilizing the void above the beams as post-tensioning ducts. Once post-tensioned, the beam haunches and voids in the
panels were cast with a early high strength, low shrinkage concrete.

A number of beam stirrups had to be bent by the contractor to relieve the interference caused by the panel reinforcing steel extending across the
opening. The 30 degree skew created a number of interference points. The contractor pointed out that if the beam stirrups had been placed in the
beam at a matching skew, no stirrups would have had to been bent to make the panels fit.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Once Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-60 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.3 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to New Prestressed Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-61 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection of full depth precast concrete slabs to precast concrete bulb tee beam. This detail is used to transfer horizontal shear between the
beams and the slab. This detail is being studied by several researchers. Design equations for this connection will most likely be issued in the
codes in the near future. Preliminary research has shown that the current AASHTO equations for horizontal shear reinforcement may be adequate.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? NA Condition at last inspection (if known) NA
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection NA
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-62 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.3 C

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Existing concrete beams

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-63 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection of full depth precast concrete slabs to existing precast concrete beam as part of a deck replacement. This detail is used to transfer
horizontal shear between the beams and the slab. This detail can be used for deck replacement projects. This detail is being studied by several
researchers. Design equations for this connection will most likely be issued in the codes in the near future. Preliminary research has shown that the
current AASHTO equations for horizontal shear reinforcement may be adequate. Drilling into the existing beams should not be problematic since
most prestressing steel is place in the lower portions of the beam.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? NA Condition at last inspection (if known) NA
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection NA
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-64 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.3 D

Contact Name: Michael Hyzak Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Full Depth Deck Panel to Prestressed Concrete I-Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Live Oak Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-65 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This is believed to be the first use of the details developed and tested under NCHRP Project 12-65. The results of this research are available in
NCHRP Report 584 entitled "Full Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panel Systems" authored by Sameh S. Badie at George Washington
University and Maher K. Tadros at the University of Nebrask-Lincoln.

Features of the connection:

1. The shear stud pockets are spaced at 4 feet on center, which reduced the amount of grouting required in the field.
2. The pockets for the shear connectors are blind in that they do not penetrate the top surface of the deck. The pockets are
grouted through tubes that project through the top of the deck.
3. The limited number of pockets in the top of the deck will provide a better riding surface as a bare concrete deck.
4. A 1/4" thick sacrificial surface is cast in the panel so that grinding of the deck after installation is possible.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2008 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-66 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Colorado DOT Detail Number 2.1.1.3 E

Contact Name: T. Mashesha Phone Number: 303-757-9352

Address: 4201 East Arkansas Avenue E-mail:
Room 330
Denver, CO 80222-3400 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Deck Slab to Precast PT Tub Girders

Name of Project where the detail was used Richmond Road over US285

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-67 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The connections between the precast slabs and the precast beams were made by embedding a steel plate into the top of the precast beams in the
fabrication yard. The studs were then welded in the field. The fabricator had difficulty with the installation of the plate at the yard. The slabs were
designed with longitudinal post tensioning (4-0.6" diameter prestressing strand per duct) and transverse prestressing.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2007 Condition at last inspection (if known) N/A (new construction)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-68 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.3 F

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to Concrete Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Various

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-69 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This detail is used to control grade during installation and to properly distribute the slab dead load to each stringer. Two bolts should be placed on
each beam or stringer. Specifications should indicate that the torque of each bolt should all be within 20% of each other so that the dead load is
relatively uniform. The details shown allows for removal of the bolt after the grout in the beam haunch has set. The contractor should be allowed to
substitute alternate details; however they should be adjustable and should be able to transmit the dead load evenly to each beam below.

This detail should be used in conjunction with grouted shear connector pockets (see details in Section 2.1.1).

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-70 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.1.4 A

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Panel to Cast-in-place Open Concrete Barrier Rail

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-71 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The Boone County IBRC Project utilized full depth precast concrete deck panels. The fabricator was given two options for precast deck panel to
barrier rail connections. The first option was a traditional option with reinforcing steel bars extending from the deck as typical in cast-in-place deck
construction. The second option involved the use of mechanical splices placed in the precast deck panels for the barrier rail connection. The
fabricator elected to use the mechanical splice connection

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression x Tension x Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Once Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-72 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.1.1.4 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast full depth slab to CIP Parapet

Name of Project where the detail was used I-84/Rt 8 Interchange, Waterbury, CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-73 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection between full depth precast concrete slabs and CIP parapet. This connection was used because of issues with lack of crash tested
precast parapets. The parapet was cast over the edge of the slabs in order to hide the edge that has the cut-off prestressing. It also hides the joints
between the slabs. To expedite construction, the parapet was cast continuously without joints. This accelerated construction to approximatley 250
feet per day.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1990 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-74 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: BGFMA Detail Number 2.1.2.2 A

Contact Name: Mark R. Kaczinski, P.E. Phone Number: 877-257-5499

Address: 300 East Cherry Street E-mail: [email protected]
North Baltimore, Ohio 45872
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Grid Deck to Steel Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Various

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.2.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-75 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Attachment of an open grid is made by field welds of the grid deck to the supporting steel beams. Partially or fully filled grids are attached to the
beams compositely through shear studs. At least one stud between each main bearing bar per beam is recommended regardless whether the
design is composite or not, and depends on the requirements of composite design. Open grid decks or filled decks can also be attached by bolting.
Minimial allowance for vertical adjustment is permitted with the bolting and welding options.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? unknown Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-76 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: BGFMA Detail Number 2.1.3.1 A

Contact Name: Mark R. Kaczinski, P.E. Phone Number: 877-257-5499

Address: 300 East Cherry Street E-mail: [email protected]
North Baltimore, Ohio 45872
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Exodermic Deck panel to Exodermic Deck panel

Name of Project where the detail was used various

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-77 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This connection is used to splice panels in the "strong" direction. The same connection is used for cast-in-place operations except that the rebar is
continuous.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1984 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? unknown Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 2 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-78 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NYSDOT Detail Number 2.1.3.2 A

Contact Name: James Flynn Phone Number: 518-485-1148

Address: 50 Wolf Rd E-mail: [email protected]
Pod 43 Albany NY 12232
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected precast slabs to steel truss stringers

Name of Project where the detail was used Troy Menands Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-79 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Precast deck panels placed onto stringers of a truss structure. Pockets have been left in the panels to create the connection to the stringers. Part of
the connection system is grade adjustment that is provided by an adjusting bolt.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1994 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 5 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 4 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-80 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NYSDOT Detail Number 2.1.3.2 B

Contact Name: James Flynn Phone Number: 518-485-1148

Address: 50 Wolf Rd E-mail: [email protected]
Pod 43 Albany NY 12232
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected precast slabs to steel floorbeam

Name of Project where the detail was used Troy Menands Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-81 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Precast deck panels placed onto stringers of a truss structure. Pockets have been left in the panels to create the connection to the stringers.
Connections between slabs are made at the floorbeam locations. This detail shows the connection away from a shear stud pocket.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1994 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 5 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 4 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-82 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NYSDOT Detail Number 2.1.3.3 A

Contact Name: James Flynn Phone Number: 518-485-1148

Address: 50 Wolf Rd E-mail: [email protected]
Pod 43 Albany NY 12232
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected precast slabs to precast curb

Name of Project where the detail was used Troy Menands Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.3.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-83 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Precast deck panels placed onto stringers of a truss structure. Pockets have been left in the panels to create the connection to the stringers. The
connections between slabs and a precast curb section are shown in this detail.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1994 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 5 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 4 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-84 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.1.4.1 A

Contact Name: Ronald Mauro Phone Number: 607-324-8454

Address: 107 Broadway E-mail: [email protected]
Hornell, NY 14843
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected FRP Superstructure component to FRP Superstructure component

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 248 over Bennett's Creek, BIN 1043150

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-85 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This project consisted of the replacement of a deteriorated reinforced concrete slab superstructure with an FRP superstructure. The new
superstructure was prefabricated in two pieces and was placed on rehabilitated reinforced concrete abutments. The detail above shows the
longitudinal connection between two adjacent panels.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-86 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.4.1 B

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Fiber Reinforced Polymer Deck to Fiber Reinforced Polymer Deck

Name of Project where the detail was used Hawthorne Street over CSX Railway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-87 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The details consist of a fiber reinforced polymer deck system attached to an existing steel floor beam/stringer system that is apart of a larger steel
truss bridge. The riding surface is a 3/8” epoxy concrete overlay.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) (8) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? >1 Year of last inspection 2008
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-88 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.1.4.2 A

Contact Name: Ronald Mauro Phone Number: 607-324-8454

Address: 107 Broadway E-mail: [email protected]
Hornell, NY 14843
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected FRP Deck to Steel Floor Beams

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 367 over Bentley Creek, BIN 1046800

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-89 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
FRP panels were used to replace the original concrete deck on this steel pony truss. FRP shims were used between the deck and the floor beams
to provide the roadway cross slope. Portions of the top skin of the deck were removed to provide access to drill through the bottom of the deck,
shims and floor beam flanges in order to bolt the panels to the floor beams. This has worked well but drilling through the shims was very difficult. If
we were to do this again, we would probably have the holes in the shims preformed.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1999 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 5 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-90 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.1.4.2 B

Contact Name: Tom Hoffman Phone Number: 518-388-0317

Address: 328 State Street E-mail: [email protected]
Schenectady, NY 12305
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected FRP Deck to Steel Truss Floorbeam

Name of Project where the detail was used Rt 418 over the Schroon River BIN 1048240

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-91 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Connection of a FRP deck to truss floorbeams. This detail can be used for stringer beams or floorbeams. Vertical adjustment
is made through the use of leveling bolts. This connection was used very effectively on this project. The design is the same as
a cast-in-place slab shear connector.

While the connection and FRP deck are working well, the thin overlay has proved to be problematic. Grout pocket reflect
through, and surface has worn, possibly from plowing.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2000 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? One known Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? maybe (yes/no/maybe) for dead load reduction
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 0 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-92 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.4.2 C

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Fiber Reinforced Polymer Deck to Existing Floor Beam of a Steel Truss

Name of Project where the detail was used Hawthorne Street over CSX Railway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-93 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The details consist of a fiber reinforced polymer deck system attached to an existing steel floor beam/stringer system that is apart of a larger steel
truss bridge. The riding surface is a 3/8” epoxy concrete overlay.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) (8) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? >1 Year of last inspection 2008
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-94 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.4.2 D

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Fiber Reinforced Polymer Deck to Steel Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 1302 over Canton Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-95 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The existing deck had been replaced by a fiber reinforced polymer deck system.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known) (7) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2007
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 6 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-96 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.1.4.3 A

Contact Name: Ronald Mauro Phone Number: 607-324-8454

Address: 107 Broadway E-mail: [email protected]
Hornell, NY 14843
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected FRP Superstructure component to FRP Barrier

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 248 over Bennett's Creek, BIN 1043150

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.4.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-97 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This project consisted of the replacement of a deteriorated reinforced concrete slab superstructure with an FRP superstructure. The new
superstructure was prefabricated in two pieces and was placed on rehabilitated reinforced concrete abutments. The detail above shows the
connection and makeup of the concrete filled barrier.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-98 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.5.1 A

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Prestressed Deck Sub-panel to Steel Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Commonly used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.5.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-99 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
A key to the performance of the deck sub-panel is to provide positive uniform support of the panels. Many states do this by working the concrete
under the panel ends over the beams. If this is specified, the 1/2" minimum dimension between the panel and the top flange should be increase to
at least equal to the largest size aggregate in the deck concrete.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-100 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.5.2 A

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Prestressed Deck Sub-panel to Prestressed Concrete I-Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Commonly used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.5.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-101 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
A key to the performance of the deck sub-panel is to provide positive uniform support of the panels. Many states do this by working the concrete
under the panel ends over the beams. If this is specified, the 1/2" minimum dimension between the panel and the top flange should be increase to
at least equal to the largest size aggregate in the deck concrete.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-102 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.5.2 B

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Prestressed Deck Sub-panel to Prestressed Concrete U-Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Commonly used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.5.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-103 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
A key to the performance of the deck sub-panel is to provide positive uniform support of the panels. Many states do this by working the concrete
under the panel ends over the beams. If this is specified, the 1/2" minimum dimension between the panel and the top flange should be increase to
at least equal to the largest size aggregate in the deck concrete.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-104 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State Dept of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.5.2 C

Contact Name: Joseph Merth, P.E. Phone Number: 360-705-7166

Address: Bridge and Structures Office E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 47340
Olympia, WA 98504-7340 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Stay-in-place deck panels to Precast trapezoidal tub girders

Name of Project where the detail was used SR5 - 38th Street Interchange - Tacoma, WA

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.5.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-105 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

To eliminate the need for deck falsework, stay-in-place precast deck panels were used.

After placement, the panels were adjusted for camber by leveling screws in each panel corner.

Grout was then placed below the panels to provide a continuous support.

After the grout cured, the leveling bolts were backed off to eliminate hard points.

Editor’s note: Other states have used nylon leveling screws to eliminate the hard points. This eliminates the process of backing them out.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 3 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-106 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: USDA Forest Products Laboratory Detail Number 2.1.6.1 A

Contact Name: Jim Wacker Phone Number: 608-231-9224

Address: One Gifford Pinchot Drive E-mail: [email protected]
Madison, WI 53726
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Glulam wood deck panel to Glulam wood deck panel

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.6.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-107 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
There have been problems with reflective cracking of the asphalt overlay even with these details. Long term maintenance may be required.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 6 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 6 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-108 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: USDA Forest Products Laboratory Detail Number 2.1.6.2 A

Contact Name: Jim Wacker Phone Number: 608-231-9224

Address: One Gifford Pinchot Drive E-mail: [email protected]
Madison, WI 53726
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Glulam wood deck panel to Glulam wood stringer

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-109 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The deck panels are made up of glue laminated wood members. The details provide the connection between the panels and a glue laminated wood
beam. For more information on this bridge type and this connection, see the Manual entitled "Standard Plans for Timber Bridge Superstructures -
General Technical Report FPL-GTR-125" published by the United States Department of Agricuilture Forest Products Laboratory. It can be obtained
at: www.fpl.fs.fed.us.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-110 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: USDA Forest Products Laboratory Detail Number 2.1.6.2 B

Contact Name: Jim Wacker Phone Number: 608-231-9224

Address: One Gifford Pinchot Drive E-mail: [email protected]
Madison, WI 53726
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Glulam wood deck panel to Steel Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-111 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The deck panels are made up of glue laminated wood members. The details provide the connection between the panels and a steel beam. For
more information on this bridge type and this connection, see the Manual entitled "Standard Plans for Timber Bridge Superstructures - General
Technical Report FPL-GTR-125" published by the United States Department of Agricuilture Forest Products Laboratory. It can be obtained at:
www.fpl.fs.fed.us.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-112 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.1.6.2 C

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Glulam Timber Deck to FRP Beam Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 601 over Dickey Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.1.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-113 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The rehabilitation of this single span bridge consists of a fiber reinforced polymer superstructure with a glulam timber deck. The superstructure is
attached to an existing concrete abutment.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) (7) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2008
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 4 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-114 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.2 Adjacent Butted Beam Systems
Butted beam systems have been used for many years. These systems are often
used for accelerated bridge construction projects to avoid deck forming and, in
some instances, deck placement. Many states have standard details for butted
systems, though only a few states have submitted details for this Manual. The
following sections outline some of the more common systems in use.

Figure 2.2-1 shows typical span ranges for different butted beam systems. The
span ranges can vary significantly depending on the specific state standards, but
the general span ranges are shown for informational purposes.

Beam Type Span Length (feet)

Adjacent Slabs/Deck Beams

Adjacent Box Beams

Double Tee Beams

Butted Bulb Tee Beams

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140

Figure 2.2-1 Typical Span Ranges for Different Butted Beam Systems

Notes:
1. This chart is for information purposes. It should not be construed to mean
specific limits.
2. Common span ranges are shown for the type of beams listed.
3. Minimum spans shown are based on common bridges. Shorter spans can be
used for all beams. For instance, a bulb tee bridge can be built to a 40 foot
span, but this is not common.
4. Maximum spans are approximate based on previous and current studies.
The maximum span length will vary depending on many factors such as
number of beams, size of parapets and sidewalks, concrete strengths, etc.

2.2.1 Precast Prestressed Concrete Deck Bulb Tee Systems

Many states have standard bulb tee beams. Bulb Tees are precast
prestressed concrete I-shaped beams that have two common
characteristics. First, the bottom flange is larger than on the older
concrete I-beams, allowing for more strands to be placed in the bottom
flange. Second, the top flange is approximately four feet wide. The
combination of these two features improves the efficiency of the section.
The top flange is relatively thin and does not act as a structural slab to
support wheel loads. Typically a composite, cast-in-place concrete deck
is placed over these beams.

Page 2-115 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 The design and dimensions of bulb tees vary from state to state;
however, several regions have agreed to use a common set of sections to
facilitate fabrication across state lines.

Following development of precast prestressed concrete bulb tee beams,

several states developed sections called deck bulb tees. The difference
between these beams and normal bulb tee beams is that the top flange is
intended to be the structural deck of the bridge. The top flanges can be
as much as eight feet wide. The beams are connected in the field to form
a beam/deck system.

When compared to adjacent prestressed box beams, deck bulb tee

beams offer a system with improved inspection access and a simpler
fabrication process. The undersides of the deck bulb tee beams are
exposed for inspection unlike the inside of the most adjacent prestressed
concrete box girders. There also are no void forms in bulb tees that need
to be held in-place when placing the concrete.

2.2.1.1 Connections Between Beams

The states that use deck bulb tees use a welded tie connection
combined with a grouted key. The ties are normally spaced five feet
on center along the edge of the beam. This connection is primarily
designed as a shear only connection. There is no intent to make this
connection a deck moment connection; therefore each flange edge
needs to be designed as a cantilever deck overhang.

Connections similar to this have been used in precast parking garage

structures for years. There was concern that the welds would fatigue
and break over time. The Texas DOT has researched transverse
welded connections for adjacent precast members and found that
when combined with a grouted shear key, the connection is sound
and durable. The Texas research was completed for butted slab
beams and double tees; however the results indicate that that the
same connection may be viable for larger butted bulb tee systems.

The Washington State DOT detail is similar to details in Texas in that

the weld is made in a beveled steel plate groove. This design allows
the connection to be made even if there is slight camber differential
between the beams.

There is ongoing research (unpublished at this time) on alternate

grouted pocket connections between beams. Researchers are
investigating the use of a small closure pour with headed reinforcing
bars and even wire mesh projecting from the flange edges. This
research has not been put into practice, but early testing has
produced favorable results.

Some designers have concerns with the long term fatigue behavior of
the welded tie connections. Therefore, at this time, it is recommended
that these welded tie details be used for bridges with lower truck
volumes.

Page 2-116 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.2.1.2 Welding and Grouting Issues
Several issues need to be considered when using welded plate
connections. First, the bottom portion of the welded plate connector is
not protected from the weather on the underside of the connection. If
a bridge is to be constructed in a corrosive environment, the
designers may want to consider the use of stainless steel plates and
rods. Second, it is important that the grout placed in the keys
between the beams completely fills the void. The most common
keyway failure results from inadequate filling of the keys. If voids are
present, the mechanical interlock of the key is lost. Project
specifications should require the use of durable, flowable grouts.
Another successful method of placement requires minor rodding of
the grout after placement. Leakage through grouted joints is a
concern for many states. Even with the best grout, minor shrinkage
cracking can be expected. For this reason, many states incorporate
overlays and waterproofing systems for butted beam systems. If an
exposed deck is desired, the cracks can be sealed during construction
(see discussion in Section 2.1.7.2 for more information on this
subject).

2.2.1.3 Camber Issues

Differential camber of the beams can lead to dimensional problems
with the connections. The Texas and Washington DOT details can
accommodate minor differential camber. If the differential camber is
excessive, the contractors in some states will apply dead load to the
high beam to bring it within the connection tolerance.

2.2.2 Precast Prestressed Concrete Tee Systems

Several different precast prestressed concrete tee systems are in use.
Texas DOT has a modified deck slab beam with a tee flange extending
beyond the sides of the slab as well as a double-tee section. Figure
2.2.2-1 depicts a typical cross section of the Texas decked slab beam
with extended flanges. The Texas beams are connected using a welded
anchor plate and grout. Other states have double-tees and even a triple-
tee. New York DOT built a quad tee system that was the full width of a
two lane road.

Page 2-117 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Figure 2.2.2-1 Texas Decked Slab Beam with Flanges

These tee systems are very similar to the deck bulb tee sections
described in Section 2.2.1 in that the top flanges of these sections are
designed to be the structural deck of the bridge.

2.2.2.1 Connections Between Beams

The connections used for tee beams are essentially the same
connection used for the deck bulb tees. See Section 2.2.1 for more
information on this connection.

2.2.2.2 Span-to-Span Connections

New York DOT has used a beam end-to-end connection over the
supports to provide span-to-span continuity. The negative moment
reinforcing was connected using mild reinforcing bar couplers. The
design was proposed as part of a value engineering proposal for a
large viaduct on Long Island (Robert Moses Causeway). This project
involved the use of full width precast superstructure sections (quad-
tee). The bridge is designed to act as a simple span for dead load,
and as a continuous beam for live load. This concept is not new to
the prestressed concrete industry. Prestressed concrete I girders are
commonly made continuous for live load by using the cast-in-place
concrete deck as a top flange tension connection. The New York
detail makes use of the full width top flange of the quad tee to make a
small closure pour across the bridge deck. The quad tee system
included concrete end diaphragms cast into the pieces, which acted
as forms for the small closure pour.

2.2.2.3 Welding and Grouting Issues

See Section 2.2.1.2 for information on welding and grouting issues
with prestressed adjacent butted beam bridges.

2.2.2.4 Camber Issues

See Section 2.2.1.3 for information on camber issues with prestressed
adjacent butted beam bridges.

Page 2-118 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.2.3 Precast Prestressed Adjacent Slab and Adjacent Box Beam Systems
Many states have used precast prestressed adjacent deck slab and
adjacent box beam bridges as standard bridge systems for years. The
“slab system” or “deck slab system” is typically less than 21 inches deep.
The “adjacent box beam system” is typically more than 21 inches deep.
The beams are normally three feet or four feet wide; however, some
states have used wider sections. Figure 2.2.3-2 shows cross sections of
common butted precast prestressed beams.

Figure 2.2.3-2 Typical Butted Precast Prestressed Beam Sections

(Box Beams (top), Slab/Deck Beams (bottom))

These deck slab and adjacent box beam systems all function in the same
manner; they are intended to act as the structural deck of the bridge.
Most are designed so that no concrete deck is required over the beams,
often leading to rapid construction. Typical construction involves
placement of the beams, connecting the beams with a lateral tie system
and grout, and installation of a bituminous wearing surface. It is
recommended that an asphalt overlay with waterproofing membrane be
used for these systems to extend the service life, particularly where

Page 2-119 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 deicing chemicals are used. Using these systems, construction of an
entire superstructure can be completed in less than three days.

Many states have noted that when these bridges are exposed to heavy
truck traffic, there is a tendency for the joints between the beams to leak.
In extreme cases, the joints have completely failed. There has been a
call for more research on this connection; however the research has
never been funded.

Even with the current details, the performance of these bridges on lower
volume roadways has been very good. Massachusetts has used these
structures since the 1950’s. Recent inspection reports indicate that these
local road bridges are performing very well, even after 50 years of service
[51].

Louisiana DOT submitted details for precast approach slabs that are
similar to details for precast adjacent slab systems. Since these details
are essentially the same as deck slab systems, they have been included
in this section. Additional details for connections of approach slabs to
abutments can be found in Section 3.2.4.2.

Most states have standard details for connection of these systems,

though only a few submitted details for publication in this Manual. It is
recommended that users of this Manual refer to the applicable state
standards for more information on the specific detail requirements of each
state.

2.2.3.1 Connections Between Slabs and Between Adjacent Box Beams

Most of the states using these systems have standard details
available on-line. The typical connection systems include a lateral tie
system combined with a shear key filled with non-shrink grout. There
are no design parameters for these connections in the AASHTO
LRFD Design Specifications. The designs have evolved over the
years on a trial and error basis. Louisiana has used similar
connections to make longitudinal connections between precast
approach slab elements.

Traditional Post-Tensioning and Bolted Systems

Most states use a transverse tie system to connect the beams.
The ties range from simple threaded rods to sophisticated post-
tensioning systems. The spacing of the ties varies, but most are
approximately 25 feet maximum on center. The amount of post-
tensioning force varies greatly from state to state. Some state
use a little as 10,000 pounds per tie, others use over 60,000
pounds per tie.

The AASHTO LRFD specifications [1] have a recommendation for

250 psi transverse post-tensioning between deck slabs. This
provision is not recommended for these connections because the
connected elements are not deck slabs, and achieving this level of
post-tensioning is not easily attainable. There has been research

Page 2-120 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 recommended for this connection by the Concrete Bridge
Committee of the Transportation Research Board; however the
research has not been funded to date. The Precast Prestressed
Concrete Institute is also studying this connection. Users of this
manual should keep apprised of future developments of these
connections from these two organizations.

The ties are normally placed inside of holes that are cast through
the width of the beams. Many states tension the ties prior to
grouting the shear keys. The problem with this approach is that
the post-tensioning force is taken up through friction in the
bearings. Little or no force is actually applied to the interface
between the beams.

In the northeast, the ties are tensioned after the grout is set. This
approach places the actual grouted joint between the beams into
compression, which is a preferred method of making this
connection. This means that the post-tensioning system needs to
be in a duct so that the shear key grout will not bind the tie. These
states typically use an unbonded single strand tendon in a grease
filled sheath. The anchorages are epoxy coated and the entire
system is sealed with grease.

Reinforced Closure Pours

The Minnesota DOT has developed a new system based on a
system developed in France. The important feature of this system
is the connection between the beams. Lateral reinforcing steel
projects from the sides of the inverted tee beams. Instead of a
traditional grouted shear key, a large reinforced concrete closure
pour is used between and over the adjacent inverted team beams
to form the bridge deck. Figure 2.2.3.1-1 shows this system under
construction. This system has been used successfully on several
bridges in Minnesota.

Figure 2.2.3.1-1 Minnesota Adjacent Beam System

Page 2-121 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Welded Connections
At least one state (Texas) uses a welded plate connection for
adjacent deck slab bridges. Please refer to Section 2.2.1 for more
information on welded connections.

2.2.3.2 Concrete Over Pours and Composite Toppings

To alleviate longitudinal joint leakage problems on higher volume
roads, some states are now specifying reinforced concrete topping
slabs over the adjacent beams. These slabs contain one reinforcing
layer and are typically five to six inches thick. Even with the concrete
topping, these bridges can be constructed much more rapidly than a
conventional bridge with a cast-in-place deck because no forming is
required to support the wet concrete.

2.2.4 Glue Laminated Timber Adjacent Deck Slabs

The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Products Laboratory
(USDA FPL) has developed standard bridge details for timber bridges.
These standards include prefabricated timber panels and beams. Most
timber bridges are used on low volume roadways, but may be applicable
to higher volume roads as well. Users of this Manual are encouraged to
visit the USDA FPL for more information on timber bridges
(www.fpl.fs.fed.us).

Short span bridges can be built using longitudinal glue laminated timber
deck panels that span from support to support. The prefabrication
involves gluing nominal dimension lumber side-by-side to create a solid
panel. For deck slabs, the laminations have the wide face in the vertical
direction. Protection against rotting is controlled by the use of pressure
treated wood products. The individual laminations can be pressure
treated before being laminated together, or the laminated pieces can be
pressure treated after fabrication. The glue used for bridge application
must be waterproof.

The connection between wood deck panels is used to transfer shear

between the panels. Earlier versions of this system used only steel
dowels placed mid-depth between the panels. This system proved to be
problematic for higher volume roadways, especially when a bituminous
wearing surface was employed. The connections would eventually
loosen, leading to cracking of the pavement and leakage through the
joints.

The current details include a load transfer beam placed at mid-bay

between the support stringers. This beam provides a more significant
shear transfer mechanism. Even with this connection, reflective cracking
can occur in the overlay pavement. For this reason, it is recommended
that a layer of geotextile fabric be installed between the pavement and the
panels.

Page 2-122 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Another type of timber superstructure that has been used quite often is a
nail laminated or stress laminated wood deck. These systems consist of
dimensional lumber placed side by side that are either nailed together, or
post-tensioned together. This type of construction can be completed in a
relatively short amount of time. Connection details of laminated decks
are not included in this manual because the decks are more of a system
as opposed to a specific connection. Users of this Manual are
encouraged to visit the Forest Products Laboratory website for more
information on nail laminated and stress laminated timber decks
(www.fpl.fs.fed.us).

2.2.4.1 Connections Between Slabs

The connection between wood deck slabs is used to transfer shear
between the slabs. A load transfer beam placed transversely across
the bridge at a specified spacing provides a shear transfer mechanism
between the units.

2.2.5 Grade Control and Tolerances

Most adjacent butted systems are constructed with precast pretensioned
concrete. Precast beams are normally cast flat and arrive at the project
site with minor camber caused by the prestressing force. In order to build
a bridge to a specified vertical profile, the thickness of the concrete
topping or wearing surface must vary along the beam length to
compensate for this camber. For bridges on crest vertical curves, the
thickness of the topping or wearing surface will be thicker near mid-span.
For bridges on sag vertical curves, the topping or wearing surface will be
thicker near the supports. Designers need to account for these variations
when designing the beams and setting the grades of the supports.

The grades of the roadway also affect construction of parapets and curbs.
The variation in topping and wearing surface thickness must be applied to
curb heights as well.

Normal tolerances specified in the PCI Manual entitled “Tolerance Manual

for Precast and Prestressed Concrete Construction – MNL 135-00”
should suffice for precast prestressed adjacent butted beam systems [16].
A nominal width joint is normally specified between the beams to account
for the allowable sweep tolerance in the beams.

2.2.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Adjacent

Beam Systems
As previously stated, adjacent butted beam systems have proven very
durable. Some bridges have been in service for over 50 years with no
significant deterioration. Most problems with these systems are found on
high volume roadways. It appears that the standard grouted shear keys
with nominal lateral ties may not be adequate for high volume roads. An
informal unpublished study was performed by the Connecticut DOT on
failed grouted shear key connections on an Interstate highway bridge.
Several joints were cored to inspect the grouted keys. Voids were
discovered in the upper half of all joints, indicating that the mechanical
interlock of the shear key was lost. Based on this discovery, it was

Page 2-123 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 determined that poor grouting techniques were employed during
construction of the bridge, which led to the voids in the keyways. Even
with this limited study, there is no consensus about the cause of leakage
through longitudinal joints. The cause is either inadequate lateral post-
tensioning, or poor grouting techniques.

Several states are addressing this problem by adding reinforced concrete

toppings to make a better connection between the beams. This has
proven to be a successful way to minimize the problems with leakage
through the joints.

The more traditional lateral tie systems with bituminous wearing surfaces
appear well suited for local low volume roads. These bridges can be
constructed rapidly with minimal field construction, and should require
little or no maintenance for many years.

2.2.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

Timelines for construction depend on the weather and site-specific factors
such as access, traffic control, and locations for cranes and storage.
Nonetheless, it is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction
time for the various systems discussed in this section.

Table 2.2.7-1 contains approximate installation times for the various

adjacent butted beam systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time*
Deck Bulb Tee 2 days Includes erection, welding, and
Beams grouting
Tee Beams 2 Days Includes erection, welding, and
grouting
Adjacent Deck Slab 2 Days Includes erection, welding or tie
and Adjacent Box installation, and grouting
Beam Systems
Table 2.2.7-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Butted Beam
Systems
• Times indicated are for a typical single span bridge. Multiple
spans can be built in the same time frame with larger construction
crews.

2.2.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

Most problems with butted beam systems involve the adjacent deck slab
and adjacent box beam systems. The leakage of the joints on high
volume bridges without concrete toppings can be problematic. The
concrete topping addresses this problem, but adds time and cost to the
project. Additional research should study the grouted key construction
combined with lateral post-tensioning to determine if a durable grouted
key system is feasible.

Page 2-124 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.2.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Adjacent Butted Beam Systems
The following pages contain data sheets for the various prefabricated
butted beam systems. This information was primarily gathered from
agencies that have developed and used the systems. Most data in the
sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors added text when
an agency did not supply all requested information. The owner agencies
also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components Connected
• Name of Project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit

Page 2-125 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 • Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 2-126 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State D.O.T. Detail Number 2.2.1.1 A

Contact Name: Bijan Khaleghi Phone Number: 360-705-7395

Address: P O Box 47340 E-mail: [email protected]
Olympia, WA 98504
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Deck Beam to Precast Deck Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard Detail

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-127 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
These connections are used for a variety of girder types in Washington State. Girder types include:
- Double tee beams
- Triple Tee (Ribbed) Beams
- Deck Bulb Tees

The welded connections are spaced a maximum of 5 feet on center.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 5 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 6 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-128 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Wyoming DOT Detail Number 2.2.1.1 B

Contact Name: Gregg Fredrick Phone Number: 307 777 4427

Address: 5300 Bishop Blvd E-mail: [email protected]
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Longitudinal Beam/Slab to Adjacent Longitudinal Beam/Slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge over middle Fork Crazy Woman Creek (Wyoming Drawing Number 6635)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-129 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This is a typical connection used between deck bulbed T girders. The welded connection is spaced at approximately 6 foot intervals. Additional
surfacing is not typically specified, as the top of the flange is the final wearing surface.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 3 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-130 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Wyoming DOT Detail Number 2.2.1.1 C

Contact Name: Gregg Fredrick Phone Number: 307 777 4427

Address: 5300 Bishop Blvd E-mail: [email protected]
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concrete Backwall Panel to Adjacent Precast Concrete Backwall Panel

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge over middle Fork Crazy Woman Creek (Wyoming Drawing Number 6635)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-131 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
The welded steel plates are somewhat exposed after construction is complete. It is recommended that stainless steel plates and welds be used for
this connection.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-132 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.2.2.1 A

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Prestressed Double Tee Beam to Prestressed Double Tee Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.2.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-133 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

These connectors are spaced 5 feet on center along the entire length of the beam.

Editor's Notes
The welded steel plates are exposed on the under side of the bridge; therefore it is recommended that stainless steel plates and welds be used to
improve durability.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-134 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.2.2.1 B

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Prestressed T Beam to Prestressed T Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Battleground Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.2.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-135 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

These connectors are spaced 5 feet on center along the entire length of the beam.

Editor's Notes
The welded steel plates are exposed on the under side of the bridge; therefore it is recommended that stainless steel plates and welds be used to
improve durability.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-136 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.2.2.2 A

Contact Name: Paul Besmertnik - Regional Struct. Eng. Phone Number: (631) 952-6074
Address: State Office Building E-mail: [email protected]
250 Veterans Memorial Highway
Hauppauge, NY 11788 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Quad Tee Superstructure to Precast Quad Tee Superstructure

Name of Project where the detail was used Robert Moses Causway Bridge Rehabilitation over Great South Bay

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.2.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-137 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This is a continuity connection for precast/prestressed quad-T superstructure made continuous for live load. Connecting these units together
longitudinally is made with a rebar coupler at the top and overlapping mild steel at the bottom (similar to standard AASHTO I-girders). Upon
completion of the connection the entire superstructure was overlaid with a 1.5" microsilica concrete wearing surface. Transverse post tensioning is
not needed as the precast units are fabricated the full width of the superstructure. Connection details to the pile cap are similar to NYSDOT's
standard connection for precast box girders and AASHTO I-beams with the use of a dowel grouted into the top of the cap beam. Waterway access
is necessary to transport these full width units to the bridge site.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1999 Condition at last inspection (if known)deterioration noted
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-138 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Louisiana DOT Detail Number 2.2.3.1 A

Contact Name: Paul Fossier Phone Number: (225) 379-1323

Address: Louisiana Department of Transportation E-mail: [email protected]
1201 Capitol Access RD
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Approach Slab to Precast Approach Slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Louisiana Forest Highway Kisatchie National Forest Clear Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-139 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This type of bridge is used on short span bridges on low volume roadways. The approach slabs and deck slabs are made of precast solid slab
sections.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-140 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Louisiana DOT Detail Number 2.2.3.1 B

Contact Name: Paul Fossier Phone Number: (225) 379-1323

Address: Louisiana Department of Transportation E-mail: [email protected]
1201 Capitol Access RD
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Approach Slab to Precast Deck Slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Louisiana Forest Highway Kisatchie National Forest Clear Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-141 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This type of bridge is used on short span bridges on low volume roadways. The approach slabs and deck slabs are made of precast solid slab
sections.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-142 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Louisiana DOT Detail Number 2.2.3.1 C

Contact Name: Paul Fossier Phone Number: (225) 379-1323

Address: Louisiana Department of Transportation E-mail: [email protected]
1201 Capitol Access RD
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Deck Slab to Precast Deck Slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Louisiana Forest Highway Kisatchie National Forest Clear Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-143 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-144 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: MnDOT Bridge Office Detail Number 2.2.3.1 D

Contact Name: Joseph M. Fishbein, P.E. Phone Number: 651-747-2196

Address: 3485 Hadley Avenue N. E-mail: [email protected]
Oakdale, MN 55128
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast "Inverted-T" Beams to Adjacent "Inverted-T" Beams

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge 13004, TH 8 over Center Lake Channel, Center City, MN

Connection Details: Manual Reference: Section 2.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-145 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Connection between adjacent precast "Inverted-T" beams. The beams

consist of a rectangular prestressed section with smaller flanges along
the sides. When beams are butted laterally, the flanges form a channel
between beams. Rebar hooks cast into the beams overlap in this region,
and a pre-tied rebar cage is also placed in the channel. When the deck
topping is poured, the beam sections are locked together monolithically.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 3 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 6 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-146 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: USDA Forest Products Laboratory Detail Number 2.2.4.1 A

Contact Name: Jim Wacker Phone Number: 608-231-9224

Address: One Gifford Pinchot Drive E-mail: [email protected]
Madison, WI 53726
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Glulam wood deck panel to Glulam wood deck panel

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.2.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-147 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The deck panels are made up of glue laminated wood members. The details provide the interconnection between the panels. These bridges are
typically used for low volume roadways. For more information on this bridge type and this connection, see the Manual entitled "Standard Plans for
Timber Bridge Superstructures - General Technical Report FPL-GTR-125" published by the United States Department of Agricuilture Forest
Products Laboratory. It can be obtained at: www.fpl.fs.fed.us.

Editor's Notes
There have been problems with reflective cracking of the asphalt overlay even with these details. Long term maintenance may be required.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 6 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 6 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-148 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.3 Decked Stringer Systems
This section focuses on connections between traditional parallel superstructure
stringer beam elements, the most common form of bridge in use today. The
connections presented include both transverse connections and longitudinal beam
splices.

2.3.1 Transverse Connections

The transverse connection between parallel beam elements is referred to
as a cross frame or diaphragm. These connections serve to:
• Assist with lateral distribution of load in the structure
• Provide lateral stability of the beams during construction
• Transfer wind loads from the fascia beam to the interior beams
and deck slab.

2.3.1.1. Connections Between Steel Beams

Diaphragms and cross frames for steel bridges are easily attached by
bolting or welding. State agencies have standard details for these
connections; therefore, they are not presented in this Manual. Most
diaphragms and cross frames have bolted connections. To expedite
construction, designers should keep the number of bolts required for
these connections to a minimum.

2.3.1.2 Connections Between Prestressed Precast Beams

Diaphragms and cross frames for prestressed precast concrete
beams are typically more difficult to build than steel bridge members.
Often, these elements are made using cast-in-place concrete. The
time for forming and curing of the connections can be significant. This
section contains details for prefabricated diaphragms and cross
frames that have been developed by several states. They include
both steel bolt-on diaphragms and precast diaphragm forms.

2.3.2 Longitudinal Connections

2.3.2.1 Steel Beams
Longitudinal connections for steel beams are commonly referred to as
beam splices. The most common form of beam splice is a bolted
connection. These connections can be quite large and contain
numerous bolts; however, in most cases, several connections can be
made in one day.

There are ways to expedite the erection of steel beams with bolted
splices. The critical time constraint on a steel beam erection site is
the time that the cranes are idle while the connections are made. Two
things can be done to expedite this process. First, an erection tower
can be used to rest the beams after they are set. Second, the
designer can allow for early release of the beam by the cranes after a
certain number of bolts are installed. The National Steel Bridge
Alliance recommends the following practice [42]:

“For splice connections of primary members, as well as

connections of diaphragms or cross frames designed to brace

Page 2-149 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 curved girders, fill at least 50 percent of the holes prior to crane
release. The 50 percent may be either erection bolts in a snug tight
condition or full-size erection pins, but at least half (25 percent of
all holes) shall be bolts, and sufficient pins shall be used near
outside corners of splice plates and at member ends near splice
plate edges to ensure alignment. Uniformly distribute the filled
holes.

The 50 percent requirement may be waived if a reduced

percentage is calculated as sufficient and shown on the approved
erection procedure.”

Welded field splices are not as common as bolted splices. Temporary

support towers are usually required to complete a welded field splice.

2.3.2.2 Prestressed Precast Concrete Beams

There are two methods used to splice a prestressed precast concrete
beam. The most common splice involves a concrete closure pour
combined with longitudinal post-tensioning. Closure pours are used
because precast beam elements will arrive in the field with some
residual camber from prestressing. The camber leads to beam end
rotation that is variable and difficult to estimate. The closure pour can
accommodate variations in beam end angles and also allow for minor
length tolerance adjustments. The closure pours are reinforced with
steel projecting from the beam element and often include shear keys.
The post-tensioning ducts are simply spliced within the closure pour
area.

The second method that has been used is to match cast the two
adjacent elements in the fabrication shop. This method can be
problematic if there is any measurable prestress in the beams that
would lead to camber growth. Match casting should only be used for
beams with little or no pretensioned prestressing.

2.3.3 Simple Span Beams Made Continuous For Live Load

It can be cost effective to construct multi-span bridges that act as simple
spans for dead loads and continuous spans for composite dead loads and
live loads. This is accomplished using the following construction
procedure:
• Erect the beams spanning from support-to-support without a
continuity connection at the supports. The beam ends are butted
with a minor gap at the piers.
• Cast the bridge decks over the spans but not over the beam ends
at the pier.
• Connect the beams by casting a block of concrete between the
beam ends. This pour usually includes an integral diaphragm.
• Cast the bridge deck over the pier closure pour. Negative
moment reinforcing is normally placed within the deck in this area.
The deck is sometimes cast with the beam end closure pour.

Page 2-150 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 From this time forward, the bridge acts as a continuous span
because the closure pour is designed to transfer the subsequent
composite dead load (e.g., median barrier, parapet, sidewalk) and
live load moments from one beam end to the adjacent beam end.
• Complete the bridge construction.

2.3.3.1 Prestressed Precast Concrete Beams

The prestressed concrete industry has been making precast concrete
beams for many years. There are special considerations that need to
be addressed in a design with prestressed concrete beams.
Prestressed concrete beams will continue to experience camber
growth after prestress release. Camber growth results in minor
rotation of the ends of the beams. After the beams are connected at
the piers, the camber growth will either crack the closure pour, or
create positive moments in the connection. There have been several
research projects regarding this connection. The most commonly
reference document is NCHRP Report 322 entitled “Design of Precast
Bridge Girders Made Continuous. The basic issues noted in this
research are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Different states use different approaches to address the camber

growth phenomenon. Some states use little reinforcing in the
connection and allow it to crack. Once the crack forms, the
connection will be free to rotate and the bridge will behave as a simple
span bridge for live load because of the hinging effect of the cracked
connection. Even with the cracking, there are advantages to this
connection; the bridge will still be jointless and more durable than a
simple span bridge with a deck joint.

Another approach to this connection is to reinforce the connection to

resist the positive moments at the piers that are generated by camber
growth. This will lead to positive moments along the span due to
prestress, but will provide significant negative moment capacity that
can decrease positive moments along the span. There are two
methods used to create the positive moment connection within the
closure pour. The first is to extend a number of prestressing strands
into the closure pour by bending them near the face of the beam end.
The second method is to embed mild reinforcing steel in the beam
that protrudes from the beam end and into the closure pour. With
either method, the long term internal stresses in the beams need to be
calculated and checked, and the negative moment reinforcing in the
slab needs to be designed.

Although engineers are taught that continuous span designs are more
efficient than simple span designs, simple span structures without
deck joints described above can also be efficient, cost effective, and
quickly built. The efficiencies are seen primarily in the negative
moment regions. A large portion of the sharp moment gradients near
interior supports are shifted to the positive moment regions. An
added benefit to the simple span designs described above is that the
deck joint over the pier will be eliminated, thereby reducing the

Page 2-151 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 potential for future deterioration of the underlying framing and
foundations. Depending on the design, minor cracking may occur at
the pier, but this can be controlled with waterproofing membranes or
in dryer climates, left alone. Also, simple-span construction allows
simplified future replacement of beams, e.g., when damaged from
below by over height loads, and simplified future widening.

State agencies have standard practices for the design and detailing of
this connection. Many use the jointless simple span approach due to
the simplicity of the design and detailing. Designers should refer to
the specific state standards for this connection. If none exist, the
authors of this manual recommend the approach developed by the
New Hampshire DOT that is available through the PCI Northeast
Bridge Technical committee. The committee has prepared a concise
design and detailing guide based on methods developed by the New
Hampshire DOT [43].

2.3.3.2 Steel Beams

This method of construction is primarily used by the precast
prestressed concrete industry; however, the approach can also be
applied to steel beam bridges. There has been recent research into
the use of multiple simple span steel bridges that are made
continuous for live load only. The idea is to erect each span as a
simple span and then make a simple connection at the supports using
cast-in-place concrete. This connection eliminates the need for
significant field bolting or welds, allowing the cranes to release the
beams immediately after they are in position, greatly reducing erection
time.

Several states have used this method to make older simple span
bridges continuous for live load during deck replacement projects.
Once the deck is removed, the bottom flanges can be connected with
welded plates. The bridge deck can be designed to act as the tension
flange by reinforcing the deck over the pier, thereby eliminating the
need for a top flange tension splice. Welded stud shear connectors
complete the top flange connection by joining the deck slab to the
beams.

2.3.4 Tolerances
Tolerances play a key role in transverse connections between longitudinal
beam elements.

Steel beams are fabricated to specific cambers; however, tolerances in

manufacturing can affect the cross frame connections. This is not usually
an issue because the beams are quite flexible. Some designers have
specified the use of slotted holes to accommodate camber tolerance.
This approach is not recommended because it can lead to a buildup of
erection misalignments. The steel industry suggests simply designing
these connections with standard bolt holes.

Page 2-152 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Concrete beams can be more problematic because the beam camber is
constantly changing due to the prestress forces. It is not unusual for
camber to vary from one beam to another. The connections need to
address this differential camber potential. Slotted holes in steel cross
frames and adjustable forms for closure pours are often employed.

2.3.5 Evaluation of Performance and Long-Term Durability of Stringer

Beam Systems
Some of the connections discussed in this section are located below the
bridge deck and are therefore not subject to corrosive environments. One
connection that can have a significant effect on long term durability is the
continuity connection on bridges that are designed as continuous for live
load. The elimination of deck joints is one of the most effective ways to
improve the durability of the entire bridge structure. Leakage from deck
joints can cause damage to the beam framing and foundations.

2.3.6 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

The times required for construction depend on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and
proximity to storage areas. Nonetheless, it is possible to make
reasonable estimates of the minimum required construction time for the
various systems discussed in this section.

Table 2.3.6-1 provides approximate installation times for various decked

stringer systems:

Page 2-153 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 System Minimum Comments
Installation
Time*
Cast-in-place 2 Days Time includes forming multiple
concrete diaphragm diaphragms and placing of
on PS beams concrete.
Precast diaphragms 1 Day Multiple diaphragms can be
on PS beams completed in one day
Steel cross frames 1 Day Multiple cross frames can be
on PS beams completed in one day
Bolted beam splices 1 Day Except for very large connections,
on steel beams in most cases multiple connections
can be completed in one day.
Welded beam splice 2 Days Large beam splices may take
on steel beam longer
Cast-in-place closure 2 Days Time includes forming multiple
pour splice on PS splices and placing of concrete
beams
Live load continuity 3 Days Time includes forming multiple
connections on closure pours and placing of
concrete and steel concrete
beams
Table 2.3.6-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Decked
Stringer Systems

* The time for cast-in-place concrete is based on the use of high early
strength concrete that can be cured rapidly.

2.3.7 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

The connections described in this section are quite common and well
tested. They result in durable stable connections.

2.3.8 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Decked Stringer Systems

The following pages contain data sheets for the various decked stringer
systems. This information was primarily gathered from agencies that
have developed and used the systems. Most data in the sheets were
provided by the owner agency; the authors added text when an agency
did not supply all requested information. The owner agencies also
provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its

Page 2-154 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Component Connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 2-155 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Page 2-156 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections
Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.3.1.2 A

Contact Name: James Flynn Phone Number: 518-485-1148

Address: POD 43 E-mail: [email protected]
50 Wolf Rd
Albany NY 12232 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Diaphragms to Precast Spread Girders

Name of Project where the detail was used

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-157 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The detail shown is a precast diaphragm that is attached to precast bulb tees and/or AASHTO I-beams. The precast portion of the diaphragm acts
as a form. The precast piece is u-shaped and when it is set in place reinforcing runs through the girder webs and into the diaphragm. CIP concrete
is then placed in the precast diaphragm to form the connection.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1985 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 10 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? maybe (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 5 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-158 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.3.1.2 B

Contact Name: James Flynn Phone Number: 518-485-1148

Address: POD 43 E-mail: [email protected]
50 Wolf Rd
Albany NY 12232 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Steel Diaphragms to Precast Spread Girders

Name of Project where the detail was used

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-159 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The detail shows the connection of steel diaphragms to precast concrete bulb tees/ AASHTO I-beams. The beams have threaded inserts cast into
them so the steel can be bolted into the webs. When diaphragms are in line with each other, a hole is placed in the web and diaphragms are bolted
to each side.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment x Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 6 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-160 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.3.1.2 C

Contact Name: James Flynn Phone Number: 518-485-1148

Address: POD 43 E-mail: [email protected]
50 Wolf Rd
Albany NY 12232 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Steel Diaphragms to Precast Spread Girders

Name of Project where the detail was used

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-161 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The detail shows the connection of steel diaphragms to precast concrete bulb tees/ AASHTO I-beams. The beams have threaded inserts cast into
them so the steel can be bolted into the webs. When diaphragms are in line with each other, a hole is placed in the web and diaphragms are bolted
to each side.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment x Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 6 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-162 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Pennsylvania DOT Detail Number 2.3.1.2 D

Contact Name: Tom Macioce, P.E. Phone Number: (717) 787-2881

Address: 400 North Street E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 2951
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2951 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Intermediate Diaphragm to Precast Girder

Name of Project where the detail was used Penn DOT Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-163 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The diaphragm is attached to the girders by means of a lateral post tensioning system. Small closure pours are used to accomodate sweep
tolerances in the girders. Several details are shown. More details for different bridge configurations are available from the DOT.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1987 Condition at last inspection (if known) 7 - Good
How many times has this detail been used? <20 Year of last inspection 2007
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-164 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State D.O.T. Detail Number 2.3.2.2 A

Contact Name: Joseph Merth, P.E. Phone Number: 360-705-7166

Address: Bridge and Structures Office E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 47340
Olympia, WA 98504-7340 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast tub girder segment to Precast tub girder segment

Name of Project where the detail was used SR5 - 38th Street Interchange - Tacoma, WA

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.2.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-165 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The two-span superstructure consists of precast trapezoidal tub girder segments with 3 segments per span. The segments were post-tensioned
together after the deck pour. In between each segment is a 3' closure. A partial height intermediate diaphragm spans transversely between
segments. Initial design did not include the intermediate diaphragms. However, further interpretation of the AASHTO 16th Edition indicated that they
were required.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? Several Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? Maybe (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 4 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 5 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-166 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: MnDOT Bridge Office Detail Number 2.3.3.1 A

Contact Name: Joseph M. Fishbein, P.E. Phone Number: 651-747-2196

Address: 3485 Hadley Avenue N. E-mail: [email protected]
Oakdale, MN 55128
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast "Inverted-T" Beam to Precast "Inverted-T" Beam at pier

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge 13004, TH 8 over Center Lake Channel, Center City, MN

Connection Details: Manual Reference: Section 2.3.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-167 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection at piers between precast "Inverted-T" beams on successive spans and the pier cap. Beams rest on elastomeric pads on pier cap with a
4" space between successive spans. Vertical dowels in pier cap, spaced 12" apart over central 50% of bridge width, are between beams. A
prefabricated rebar cage spans across pier cap in the channels formed by adjacent Inv-T beams. When deck topping is poured, the space
between beams is filled as well, forming a continuous connection. For design, spans are treated as simply-supported for non-composite DL and
continuous for LL and composite DL. Additional analysis for restraining moment due to creep is also performed.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 3 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-168 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NMB Splice Sleeve Detail Number 2.3.3.1 B

Contact Name: Alvin C. Ericson Phone Number: 888-446-5376

Address: PO Box 367897 E-mail: [email protected]
Bonita Springs, FL 34136-7897
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Box Beam to Precast Box Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Unquowa Road, Fairfield CT

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-169 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to create a structure that is continuous for live load. Special splice sleeves were used that could be slid to one side and then
slid into position after beam placement. The installation procedure is shown below.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-170 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Highway Bridge Services, L.L.C. Detail Number 2.3.3.2 A

Contact Name: Atorod Azizinamini Phone Number: (402) 472-3029

Address: 4701 Innovation Dr. Suite 106 E-mail: [email protected]
UN-Technology Park
Lincoln, NE Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Steel I-Girder to Steel I-Girder

Name of Project where the detail was used SPRAGUE BRIDGE, Lincoln, NE

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-171 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is for connecting the pier over the pier for steel bridge systems designed
as simple for dead load and continous for live and superimposed dead loads.
Significant research studies were carried out, led by Azizinamini, in developing this
detail.

The construction starts by placing the girders over the abutment and pier. The photo
on the top right shows the girders after placing over the pier. The plywoods shown
are the formwork for placing concrete diaphragm. The bottom of girders are in
contact through thick plates welded to end bearing plates. These plates do not have
to be in full contact. The construction sequence proceeds with pouring the concrete
diaphgram all the way to bottom of the girdre top flange. Two design considerations
are the type of reinforcements to be placed in the concrete diphgram before casting
and control of cracking when casting the deck slab.

After about three days after casting concrete diaphgram, the concrete deck could be
cast. The bottom right photo shows casting the concrete diaphgram prior to casting
deck slab. The continuity for the live loads and superimposed dead loads are
provided by reinforcement over the pier, prior to casting deck slab.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2003 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 4 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? YES (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-172 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Highway Bridge Services, L.L.C. Detail Number 2.3.3.2 B

Contact Name: Atorod Azizinamini Phone Number: (402) 472-3029

Address: 4701 Innovation Dr. Suite 106 E-mail: [email protected]
UN-Technology Park
Lincoln, NE Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Steel I-Girder to Steel I-Girder

Name of Project where the detail was used N2 Over I-80, Nearr Grand Island Nebraska

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-173 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This connection detail is for steel bridge systems utilizing the simple for dead load
and continous for live loads and superimposed dead loads concept. It is specialized
for steel box girder bridges. This detail is simliar to the one used for I girder bridges
using same system.

The end of girders consists of plates welded to top flanges and thick plates welded
to bottom flange of box. The end shown is placed over the pier. The two adjacent
box girders contact over the pier via plates welded to the bottom flanges.

The steel blukhead shown serves two purposes. It stabilizes the box ends and
provides a formwork for placing the concrete diaphgram over the pier. The
continuity for the live loads are achieved through reinforcement placed over the pier
prior to casting the deck slab. The construction sequence can proceed using the
same procedures as specified for I girder option

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2003 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-174 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.3.3.2 C

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Beam/Slab Unit to Precast Beam/Slab Unit

Name of Project where the detail was used Route I-95 over Lombardy Street and CSX Railroad

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.3.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-175 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to create a structure that is continuous for live load.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? >1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-176 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.4 Modular Prefabricated Superstructure Systems
This section focuses on connections between large prefabricated systems that
tend to be composed of larger elements with fewer pieces in the superstructure
system. These systems save time during construction because fewer connections
are required. These larger systems also have the advantage of fewer joints.
Several of these systems are proprietary.

2.4.1 Precast Deck/Stringer Systems (inverset)

One method of prefabrication involves constructing conventional
composite stringer bridges off site and installing them rapidly on site. In
the 1980’s, the inverset system was developed in Oklahoma. The
Inverset system consists of two steel stringers supporting a composite
concrete deck (see Figure 2.4.1-1 for Details of the system). While this
system may not seem original, the method of casting the deck makes the
system unique.

Figure 2.4.1-1 Inverset Deck System Details

The inverset system is cast at the prefabrication yard in an inverted

position with the deck forms hung from the steel stringers. This brings
about two key features of the system.
• The weight of the wet concrete induces bending stresses in the
steel stringers.
• The final top of the deck is against the form, which leads to high
quality concrete.

Figure 2.4.1-2 is a schematic of the casting operation.

Page 2-177 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Figure 2.4.1-2 Inverset™ Casting Technique

Once the deck is cast and cured, the entire system is flipped over. The
inverted casting technique induces dead load bending stresses in the
stringers which are opposite to the future live load stresses when the
bridge is constructed. This results in prestress forces in the stringers,
which permits smaller stringers or longer spans with shallow girders.

It is possible to construct complex geometries using this system. Skewed

supports and vertical curves are possible. Camber is controlled by using
deflection control stops in the casting bed; therefore, it is possible to
make connections to adjacent units using high strength bolts.

The inverset system was formerly a proprietary system and only

manufactured by a few licensed fabricators. This is no longer the case,
and these systems can now be used throughout the country without
licensing from Inverset.

2.4.1.1 Transverse Connection Between Units

The inverset system is essentially a double tee unit that can be
transported to the bridge site and erected quickly. The main
connection to adjacent units is accomplished using bolted diaphragm
plates. The overhangs of the units are normally kept small so that the
connection at the deck level is essentially a shear connection that
requires only a grouted keyway.

Several states have used this system. New York DOT has used it
extensively to replace aging bridge superstructures and to increase
vertical clearance at highway overpasses. There are several details
used at the deck connection. The most common is a non-shrink
grouted shear key to improve durability. Other details include small
closure pours containing hooked reinforcing projecting from the edges
of the deck units.

2.4.2 Large Precast Deck/Stringer Superstructure Systems for Bridges

with Floorbeams
There are many large steel bridges in the United States that are
constructed with either trusses or large girders connected with
floorbeams. In most cases, another layer of framing called stringers
spans between the floor beams. The stringers normally support the
bridge deck. The process of replacing a deck on a floorbeam stringer
bridge is cumbersome. If the floor beams are composite, it may not even

Page 2-178 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 be possible to replace the deck without closing the bridge, since removal
of the deck would reduce the capacity of the floorbeam.

At least one state (Washington State DOT) has developed a system that
can be used to replace the deck of a floorbeam stringer bridge with only
nighttime closures. To expedite the process, the existing deck and
stringers are replaced with a full-width unit that consists of the full-depth
precast deck and all framing between the floorbeams.

This system was used effectively on the Lewis and Clark Bridge, which
spans the Columbia River between Washington and Oregon. Designers
reduced the number of stringers from six to two in order to reduce the
bending moments in the floorbeams, which led to an increase in the load
capacity of the bridge. This also reduced the number of connections in
each panel.

Figure 2.4.2-1 depicts the bridge cross section before and after the
project.

Figure 2.4.2-1 Lewis and Clark Bridge Details

(Courtesy of Washington DOT)

The re-arrangement of the stringer locations on the Lewis and Clark

Bridge actually assisted in this operation since much of the framing work

Page 2-179 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 required at the new connection location could be completed before
removal of the old bridge deck.

The construction of the deck of the Lewis and Clark Bridge was
accomplished with a trailer-mounted gantry crane that was used to
remove the portion of the deck between the floorbeams and set the new
unit in one operation. This approach was complicated by the overhead
framing of the bridge truss. The gantry system was designed to fit within
the bridge opening and allowed the replacement of the deck stringer units
in overnight operations. Figure 2.4.2-2 is a photo of the completed
bridge, showing the limited height available for operation of the gantry
system.

Figure 2.4.2-2 Lewis and Clark Bridge

(Courtesy of Washington DOT)

2.4.2.1 Connection to Steel Floorbeams

The connection of a deck stringer system to the floorbeams is critical.
The connection needs to clear the top flanges of the floorbeam and be
seated properly.

The details presented are for one specific bridge; however, the
system can be adapted to many other floorbeam stringer bridge
spans.

2.4.3 Precast Concrete Arch Systems

Several precast manufacturers have developed precast concrete arch
systems. These systems consist of strip arch segments placed side-by-
side to create the bridge span. Most systems are filled arches with
granular backfill placed over the arch to complete the structure.

Most precast arch systems are complete span elements that include the
vertical stems. Other systems consist of two or three precast arch
elements connected in the field to complete the arch. Some of these
systems are proprietary and others have been developed by state
agencies.

Page 2-180 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 In most cases, the arches are designed as a two-hinge arch. The
connection to the footings is designed as a pinned connection. The arch
base is simply inserted into a keyway in the footing and grouted in place.

Figure 2.4.3-1 depicts a proprietary arch system call the Con/Span®

Bridge System. This system, including the arch elements, the spandrel
walls, the wingwalls and the footings, can be completely made with
precast concrete elements. The connections shown in Figure 2.4.3-1 are
described in the following sections.

Figure 2.4.3-1 Con/Span® Bridge System

2.4.3.1 Connection Between Arch Elements

The State of Tennessee developed a precast arch system for a bridge
on State Route 1 over Piney Creek. A similar connection has been
developed for the Bebo® arch system. The arch segments are cast in
two pieces. When erected, the two pieces form a three pin arch to
support its self weight (pinned at the base and at the crest). The
connection of the arch pieces was essentially a cast-in-place closure
pour with lapped reinforcing. Once the connection is complete, the
arch behaves as a two hinge arch for all other loads. This greatly
reduced the amount of falsework typically required to erect a concrete
arch bridge.

2.4.3.2 Connection Between Arch Segments

Most precast arch segments are simply butted together with no
structural connection. These joints can are the joints that are shown
parallel to the roadway in Figure 2.4.3-1. This lack of connection is
accounted for in the arch design. A waterproofing strip is placed over
the opening to prevent backfill soils from falling through the joints.

Page 2-181 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 On one system, there is a structural connection between the fascia
arch and the interior arches. The lateral forces acting on the spandrel
walls impart transverse overturning forces on the fascia arch. A
simple tension connection on the top of the arches ties several arch
elements together to increase the overturning resistance of the arch
structure.

2.4.3.3 Connection of Spandrel Walls

Most arch systems have fill placed over them, requiring the use of
spandrel walls to contain the fill soils. The spandrel walls can either
be precast onto the fascia arch in the fabrication plant, or precast for
installation in the field. The Con/Span® Bridge System has precast
fascia panels that are bolted to the fascia arch element.

2.4.4 Precast Concrete Box Culverts

Many state agencies have developed standard details for precast
concrete box culvert systems. The American Society of Testing and
Materials (ASTM) Specification C1433 entitled “Standard Specification for
Manufacture of Precast Reinforced Concrete Box Culverts, Storm Drains,
and Sewers” [52] can be used to design and detail these systems. This
ASTM specification is for single cell box culverts. For multi-cell box
culverts, designers typically butt single cell units side-by-side.

The use of precast concrete box culverts has become commonplace

across the country; therefore, significant details are not presented in this
Manual. Typical connections include the installation of headwalls, and
nosings. The connection between boxes is typically a nested shear key
that is not grouted, similar to the connection used on reinforced concrete
drainage pipe. Some states require rubber gaskets in the keys. Several
details are presented in this Manual for information. Readers are urged
to contact state highway agencies for more information on the details
used in their region.

2.4.5 Grade Control and Tolerances

Grade control and tolerances are critical for most systems presented in
this section. This is especially true for large prefabricated deck stringer
systems. Detailed surveys of the existing bridge framing are required to
ensure proper fit-up of the systems. Designers should also detail minor
adjustability to accommodate fabrication tolerances. This is usually
accomplished through the use of variable thickness shims.

Grade control and tolerances are not as critical for large precast concrete
arch systems and box culverts; however, designers should specify the
appropriate casting tolerances to ensure proper fit-up of the elements in
the field. The setting of tolerances on proprietary systems is usually left
up to the fabricator. ASTM C1433 includes guidance on fabrication of
box culverts.

2.4.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of Modular

Prefabricated Superstructure Systems

Page 2-182 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 With the exception of precast concrete box culverts, the systems
presented in this section are relatively new to the bridge industry. The
modular precast deck stringer systems should provide improved
resistance to the elements because the systems are constructed with
fewer joints and in a controlled environment using high quality concretes.

The inverset system uses a casting technique that has the final top
surface of the deck cast against a form. It is believed that this process
will lead to a denser top surface since the bleed water will exit the slab
through the bottom during curing, which in theory will lead to a less
pervious surface.

Precast concrete arch systems and box culverts are produced with high
quality concrete in a controlled environment, which should result in higher
quality products with longer service lives.

2.4.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

The times required for construction depend on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and
proximity to storage areas. Nonetheless, it is possible to make
reasonable estimates of the minimum required construction time for the
various systems discussed in this section.

Table 2.4.7-1 provides approximate installation times for the various

systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time
Precast Deck/Slab 1 Day Can also be installed during an
Systems overnight closure operation
Larger Precast Deck 1 Day Can also be installed during
stringer systems. multiple overnight closure
operations
Precast Concrete 1-2 Days A small single-span bridge can be
Arch Systems erected in one day after preparation
of the site. This does not include
the time for backfilling. Total
construction can be completed in
less than 2 weeks
Precast Concrete 1 Day Does not include time for site
Box Culvert preparation or backfilling
Table 2.4.7-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Modular
Prefabricated Systems

2.4.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

Each system presented in this section is unique. The standard details for
most of these systems have been thoroughly tested and demonstrated on

Page 2-183 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 numerous projects; therefore, the authors have no recommendations for
improvements.

2.4.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Modular Prefabricated

Superstructure Systems
The following pages contain data sheets for the various modular
prefabricated superstructure systems. Some systems were obtained from
manufacturers and industry groups. This information was primarily
gathered from agencies that have developed and used the systems.
Most data in the sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors
added text when an agency did not supply all requested information. The
owner agencies also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section

Page 2-184 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 2-185 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Page 2-186 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections
Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: FHWA - NJ Div. / NJ DOT Detail Number 2.4.1.1 A

Contact Name: Luc Saroufim Phone Number: 609-637-4239

Address: 840 Bear Tavern Road E-mail: [email protected]
Suite 310
West Trenton, NJ 08628 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Double Beam/Slab Component to Precast Double Beam/Slab Component

Name of Project where the detail was used I-280 over Morristown - Erie Railroad

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-187 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The superstructure is prefabricated and cannot be altered, therefore precise surveying is paramount. Replacing existing superstructures with
prefabricated components requires modifications to existing pedestals or prefabricated steel bolsters on the abutment seat. This is due to the
different geometry of the beams and the desire to meet existing grades and elevations. Pedestals are modified by removing existing masonry plates
and pouring quick setting material to the desired elevation. Steel bolsters are installed as-is.

For proper placement, the steel armoring over the abutment headers has to be removed, and the headers themselves are shaved down. From
there, field adjustments to the prefabricated system are made. Field adjustments to meet desired elevations are made via horizontal, slotted holes
in the prefabricated blockout. The blockout is then to be filled with rapid set latex modified concrete.

The system is known as the Inverset® system developed by the Fort Miller Company in New York. At one time is was a proprietary system. At this
time, the system is no longer proprietary. The photo shown below is an example of the system from another project.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known) itial insp. Conducted
How many times has this detail been used? 4 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-188 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York City DOT Detail Number 2.4.1.1 B

Contact Name: Chris Sklavounakis, PE Phone Number: 212-788-2078

Address: NYCDOT E-mail: [email protected]
2 Rector St., 7th Floor
New York, NY 10006 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Double Beam/Slab Component to Precast Double Beam/Slab Component

Name of Project where the detail was used Belt Parkway over Ocean Parkway, Brooklyn

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-189 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Adjacent prefabricated steel girder/deck units (Inverset®) were fabricated with integral backwalls. The system is comprised of two steel beams
precast into a composite slab. The resulting units are similar to precast double tees. The system on this structure also included an integral precast
backwall (see additional connection detail sheet).

Adjacent units were installed and backwalls were transversely post-tensioned. (Post-tensioning not shown in section.) The short overhang of the
slab reduces the moment demand on the connection. The connection primarily transfers shear between the connections. This detail has been part
of a proprietary system, however it may be applicable to other similar systems.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) good
How many times has this detail been used? unknown Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-190 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York City DOT Detail Number 2.4.1.1 C

Contact Name: Chris Sklavounakis, PE Phone Number: 212-788-2078

Address: NYCDOT E-mail: [email protected]
2 Rector St., 7th Floor
New York, NY 10006 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Double Beam/Slab Component to Precast Double Beam/Slab Component

Name of Project where the detail was used Belt Parkway over Ocean Parkway, Brooklyn

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-191 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Adjacent prefabricated steel girder/deck units (Inverset®) were fabricated with integral backwalls. Adjacent units were installed and backwalls were
transversely post-tensioned. Two post-tensioning ducts were used due to stage construction. Only one duct was used in the one of the stages.
This detail has been part of a proprietary system, however it may be applicable to other similar systems.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) good
How many times has this detail been used? unknown Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-192 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.4.1.1.D

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected P/C Deck/Stringer System to P/C Deck/Stringer System

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 15/29 Buckland Bridge Replacement

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-193 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Each segment of this bridge is a precast reinforced concrete deck slab cast compositely with steel rolled beams. The segments are transported to
the site for stage erection.

Joint location was set based on staging requirements.

The Middle Diaphragms shall be field installed after superstructure segments on either side of the joint are secured firmly on the bearings. Prior to
opening the bridge for the following day-traffic the Contractor shall field-drill 1” diameter doles for 7/8” diameter slip critical bolted connection, on the
connection plates and install the Middle diaphragms.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2007 Condition at last inspection (if known) Under Construction
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 5 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 3 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-194 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State D.O.T. Detail Number 2.4.2.1 A

Contact Name: Eric Schultz P.E. / John Olk P.E. Phone Number: 360-705-7227 / 360-705-7395
Address: P O Box 47340 E-mail: [email protected]/[email protected]
Olympia, WA 98504
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Stringer deck unit to Existing Steel Truss

Name of Project where the detail was used SR433, Lewis & Clark Bridge Deck Replacement

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.2.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-195 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures
C channels and W shape seats were placed while bridge was under traffic. Panels were constructed on site next to the bridge. Panels were
transported to their final location on the bridge during the night time closures using SPMTs (Self Propelled Modular Transporter) and a truss gantry
system. One panel placed per night for 4 nights in a row (each week). The design reduces bending moments on the floor beams. Future designs
should consider the exact placement method to be used. Design should also consider the methods to obtain accurate as-built dimensions so that
connection holes can be fabricated before hand to maintain existing bridge geometry. Drilling holes in place, with heavy installation equipment loads
nearby, may lock in unwanted stresses and deformations. Consideration should be given to provided a method of adjustment in the vertical
direction so that a smooth roadway profile can be maintained. The photo below shows the connection before removal of the existing stringer.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2003 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-196 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Pennsylvania DOT Detail Number 2.4.3.1 A

Contact Name: Tom Macioce, P.E. Phone Number: (717) 787-2881

Address: 400 North Street E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 2951
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2951 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Arch Section to Precast Arch Section

Name of Project where the detail was used Penn DOT Standard - Proprietary (Bebo Arch System)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-197 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The arch elements are designed with an assumed pinned connection at the base and continuous over the span. For long span arches, a mid-span
splice is made. This is achieved by installing the arch in two pieces and temporarily bolting them together at the crown. Closure pours are then
made between the two pieces. The soffit of the arch acts as a form for the closure pour.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known) 8 - Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? <20 Year of last inspection 2007
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-198 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Virginia DOT-Structure and Bridge Division Detail Number 2.4.3.1 B

Contact Name: Ken Walus Phone Number: (840) 786-4575

Address: 1404 East Broad St. E-mail: [email protected]
Richmond, VA 2319
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Post-Tensioned Concrete Arch Rib to Precast Post-Tensioned Concrete Arch Rib

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 29 Bridge over Dan River

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-199 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This bridge uses a precast post-tensioned concrete arch rib. Each rib is set in place and kept apart by steel channels (see Section D-43/43). Once
in place, the arch ribs are connected and strengthen by a post tensioning system (see Plan Detail). Then the ribs are filled with concrete. Also, the
arches are joined together by a cast in place tie beam.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2000 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-200 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Conspan Bridge Systems Detail Number 2.4.3.2 A

Contact Name: Phone Number: 800-526-3999

Address: 3100 Research Blvd. E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Arch to Precast Arch

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-201 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This detail is used to connect adjacent precast arch units. The connection is used to resist the lateral soil forces acting on the spandrel walls. A
structural connection is only used on the exterior units. Other joints are butted and sealed.

Since the plates are exposed to emnakment soils, the hardware is hot dip galvanized or stainless steel for corrosion protection.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension x Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-202 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Conspan Bridge Systems Detail Number 2.4.3.3 A

Contact Name: Phone Number: 800-526-3999

Address: 3100 Research Blvd. E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Spandrel Wall to Precast Arch Unit

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-203 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is used to connect a precast spandrel wall to a precast arch unit. The connection is a simple spread footing that is bolted using stainless
steel bolts. The photo below shows a bridge that has precast spandrel walls in the corners. The spandrel walls at mid span were precast into the
arch units at the fabrication yard. This was done due to limited cover at the gutterlines, where the L shaped spandrel unit footing could not be used.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-204 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Pennsylvania DOT Detail Number 2.4.3.3 B

Contact Name: Tom Macioce, P.E. Phone Number: (717) 787-2881

Address: 400 North Street E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 2951
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2951 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Arch Section to Precast Sandrel Wall

Name of Project where the detail was used Penn DOT Standard - Proprietary (Bebo Arch System)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-205 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The spandrel wall is attached to the precast arch by means of a cast-in-place concrete bond beam. The bond beam is used to resist the overturning
forces due to vehicle impacts. A key in the fascia arch is used to assist with sliding resistance.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known) 8 - Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? <20 Year of last inspection 2007
Would you use it again? maybe (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-206 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Conspan Bridge Systems Detail Number 2.4.3 A

Contact Name: Phone Number: 800-526-3999

Address: 3100 Research Blvd. E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Wall Stem to Precast Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-207 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is unique to Conspan Bridge Systems. The retaining wall elements are pinned to the top of the footing via a grouted joint between the
wall anchor and the footing. Overturning resistance is achieved through the wall anchor; therefore the footing connection only needs to be pinned.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-208 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Conspan Bridge Systems Detail Number 2.4.3 B

Contact Name: Phone Number: 800-526-3999

Address: 3100 Research Blvd. E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Arch Unit to Precast Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-209 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The arch elements are designed with an assumed pinned connection at the base. This is achieved by installing the arch into a shallow pocket in
order to develop the lateral shear. The footings can either be cast in place or precast. The arch units are set on shims to adjust grade and to allow
for grouting under the stem.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-210 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Conspan Bridge Systems Detail Number 2.4.3 C

Contact Name: Phone Number: 800-526-3999

Address: 3100 Research Blvd. E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Footing to Precast Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-211 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This detail is for a precast concrete footing placed on compacted gravel. The footing joint is used to connect the wingwall footing to the arch
footing.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-212 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Conspan Bridge Systems Detail Number 2.4.3 D

Contact Name: Phone Number: 800-526-3999

Address: 3100 Research Blvd. E-mail: [email protected]
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Arch to Precast Wingwall

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-213 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is used to connect a wingwall stem to the precast arch and spandrel wall. The connection is bolted using galvanized steel bolts and
plates. The connection is used to maintain alignment during backfilling. The overturning forces on the wingwall stem is resisted by the wall anchors
cast into the stem elements.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 3 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-214 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Pennsylvania DOT Detail Number 2.4.3 E

Contact Name: Tom Macioce, P.E. Phone Number: (717) 787-2881

Address: 400 North Street E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 2951
Harrisburg, PA 17105-2951 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Arch Section to Cast-in-place footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Penn DOT Standard - Proprietary (Bebo Arch System)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-215 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The arch elements are designed with an assumed pinned connection at the base. This is achieved by installing the arch into a shallow pocket in
order to develop the lateral shear.

Note: This is a proprietary bridge system.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known) 8 - Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? <20 Year of last inspection 2007
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-216 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Connecticut DOT Detail Number 2.4.4 A

Contact Name: Michael Culmo (CME Associates, Inc.) Phone Number: (860) 290-4100
Address: CME Associates, Inc. E-mail: [email protected]
333 East River Dr, Suite 400
East Hartford, CT 06108 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concrete Box Culvert to Cast-in-Place Cutoff and Return Wall

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-217 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This detail is used to create a scour prevention cut-off wall. The wall is cast prior to installation of the culvert sections. The details are taken from
the Connecticut Department of Transportation Bridge Design Manual. The photos are from another state and do not match the details exactly.

Image Courtesy Hoover Dam Bypass Project, 2004 Image Courtesy Premarc Corp., 2007

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1970's Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-218 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Connecticut DOT Detail Number 2.4.4 B

Contact Name: Michael Culmo (CME Associates, Inc.) Phone Number: (860) 290-4100
Address: CME Associates, Inc. E-mail: [email protected]
333 East River Dr, Suite 400
East Hartford, CT 06108 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concret Box Culvert to Cast-in-Place Nose and Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-219 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This detail is used when a multi-cell culvert is required for hydraulics. The nosing keeps water from infiltrating between the precast concrete box
culvert sections and improves the hydraulic capcity of the inlet.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1970'S Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-220 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Various Detail Number 2.4.4 C

Contact Name: Michael Culmo (CME Associates, Inc.) Phone Number: (860) 290-4100
Address: CME Associates, Inc. E-mail: [email protected]
333 East River Dr, Suite 400
East Hartford, CT 06108 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concret Box Culvert to Precast Concrete Box Culvert

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.4.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The connection between adjacent box culvert sections is normally treated as a simple key. The purpose of the connection is to maintain alignment
of the culvert sections. It is not intended to be a structural connection. Some states specify rubber gaskets for this joint in order to minimize piping
of backfill soils; however, many states have had success with the use of dry joints.

Page 2-221 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The individual culvert sections are set on compacted gravel or crushed

stone adjacent to each other and drawn together.

The sections are designed as a 2d frame in cross section.

Image Courtesy The Premarc Corporation, 2007

Image Courtesy American Concrete Industries, 2007

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-222 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.5 Connections between Superstructures and Substructures
This section focuses on connections between superstructure systems and
substructures. In most cases, agencies place structural bearings at these
connections. However, designers are increasingly specifying integral connections.
This section will cover both types of connections and how each relates to
accelerated bridge construction.

2.5.1 Integral Pier Caps

Several states have built bridges with integral pier caps. Integral piers
are common on the west coast due to the high seismic requirements. In
many cases, the superstructures are constructed with cast-in-place
concrete; however, the connection can also be made using precast
concrete in either the pier columns or the superstructure elements.

This connection is often very complicated and congested. There are also
tight controls over tolerances and grades. For these reasons, the most
common form of connection is a cast-in-place concrete closure pour.
Reinforcing is typically extended from the precast concrete elements to
form the connection.

2.5.2 Integral Abutments

Similar to integral pier connections, integral abutment connections are
often complicated and congested. Cast-in-place closure pours are the
common form of connection used for integral abutments.

2.5.3 Semi-Integral Abutments

Semi-integral abutment connections are similar to integral abutment
connections except they are not designed for moment transfer between
the substructure and the superstructure. Instead, the connection
transfers horizontal shear only (in both directions). These pinned
connections can be detailed with anchor rods or simply by keying the
superstructure to the substructure. The lack of a moment connection
allows for a simpler connection that can be made with little or no site-cast
concrete. The Maine DOT has developed a connection that uses precast
prestressed concrete adjacent box beams keyed into the abutment seat.
The beams are keyed in place by side blocks in the abutment and a
precast approach slab in the rear of the abutment. This system does not
require anchor bolts, allowing for a very fast connection.

2.5.4 Structural Bearings

Most bridges built in the United States employ structural bearings
between the superstructure and substructure. This connection is usually
not the critical path in the construction of a prefabricated bridge.

No bearing details are included in this Manual because each state agency
has standard details for bearings. The detailing of bearing connections
can be elaborate. Designers should make every attempt to simplify the
design of bearings on prefabricated construction projects so that the
connections can be made quickly.

2.5.5 Grade Control and Tolerances

Page 2-223 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 The connection between the substructure and the superstructure is a
location that lends itself to grade control and tolerance adjustments. This
connection is often a cast-in-place concrete pour; therefore, there
typically is room for a certain amount of adjustment.

Structural bearings are another location where adjustment can be

accommodated. Designers should detail bearing connections that allow
for adjustment. One approach is to eliminate anchor bolts at the
bearings. Another method to provide lateral restraint is the use of
concrete shear keys cast between the beams. Figure 2.5.5-1 shows a
seismic shear key for a precast pier cap. By eliminating anchor bolts, the
contractor can adjust the layout of the superstructure on the substructure.
AASHTO and the National Steel Bridge Alliance (NSBA) have published a
document entitled “Steel Bridge Bearing Design and Detailing Guide” [45].
This document, available at the NSBA website and the AASHTO internet
bookstore, has more information on anchoring bridge superstructures.

Figure 2.5.5-1 Seismic Shear Key

2.5.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long-Term Durability of

Superstructure to Substructure Connections
Most connections listed in this section include the use of cast-in-place
concrete. These connections have been used for years on conventional
integral abutments and integral pier projects. The details have been
adapted for prefabricated bridge construction.

The use of integral connections eliminates bridge deck joints, which are
the primary sites of structural deterioration. Cast-in-place closure pours
require more time than some connections; however, the durability of an
integral connection is normally worth the extra construction time.

Page 2-224 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.5.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
The times required for construction depend on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and
proximity to storage areas. Nonetheless, it is possible to make
reasonable estimates of the minimum required construction time for the
various systems discussed in this section.

Table 2.5.7-1 contains approximate installation times for the various

systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time
Integral Pier Caps 2-3 Days Time varies depending on the size
and complexity of the connection
Integral Abutment 2-3 Days Time varies depending on the size
and complexity of the connection
Semi-Integral 1-2 Days Can be as fast a few hours
Abutment depending on the details
Structural bearings 1-4 hours Some simple connections take only
minutes to connect
Table 2.5.7-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Superstructure
to Substructure Connections

2.5.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

In connecting superstructures to substructures, the detailing of structural
bearings has room for improvement. There are many bearing details in
the industry that are overly complex and difficult to build. The use of
elastomeric bearing pads should be the first bearing of choice. These
bearings are inexpensive and can be detailed for very simple and fast
installations.

It is possible to design and detail bridges with few or no anchor bolts.

Improperly placed anchor bolts can be a source of delays and cost
overruns. The AASHTO/ (NSBA) document entitled “Steel Bridge
Bearing Design and Detailing Guide” [45] offers guidance on the
elimination of anchor bolts. Even though this document is written for steel
bridges, much of the information can easily be applied to concrete bridges
as well.

2.5.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Superstructure to Substructure

Connections
The following pages contain data sheets for the various substructure to
superstructure connections.

Page 2-225 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Most data in the sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors
added text when an agency did not supply all requested information. The
owner agencies also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components Connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section of this Manual that is applicable to the
particular detail shown.
• Connection details
• Description, Comments, specification and Special Design
Procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 2-226 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: WSDOT - Bridge Office Detail Number 2.5.1 A

Contact Name: John Olk, P.E. Phone Number: 360-705-7395

Address: P O Box 47340 E-mail: [email protected]
Olympia, WA 98504
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Rectangular Column to Cast in Place Integral Pier Cap

Name of Project where the detail was used I-405, Bellevue Access Transit NE 4th / NE 6th

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.5.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-227 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection of a precast concrete column, temporarily supported, to a cast in place pier cap. This details can be used for any type of cast in place
pier cap. The column is precast with a embedded 6x6x3/4 steel angle that is used to support the column temporarily. The angle bears on a 4 by 4
foot, 8 inch concrete pad. The photo below shows the columns in the field, with a temporary concrete pad in the lower left.

Column Top View

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2003 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-228 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Washington State D.O.T. Detail Number 2.5.1 B

Contact Name: Joseph Merth, P.E. Phone Number: 360-705-7166

Address: Bridge and Structures Office E-mail: [email protected]
PO Box 47340
Olympia, WA 98504-7340 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast tub girder segment to Interior pier

Name of Project where the detail was used SR5 - 38th Street Interchange - Tacoma, WA

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.5.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-229 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Prior to casting the crossbeam the precast tub segments were placed on temporary supports. After the crossbeam was cast, the segments were
then post-tensioned together and the temporary supports removed.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? Several Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 6 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-230 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 2.5.2 A

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast concrete beam to Precast concrete integral abutment

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek, Madison County IBRC Project

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.5.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-231 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This connection was also laboratory tested by Iowa State University as part of the evaluation of the IBRC project. The results of ISU's study will be
published at a future date.

The connection to the superstruture is a reinforced cast in place concrete closure pour.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-232 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.5.3 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Adjacent Box Beam Superstructure to Precast semi-integral abutment stem

Name of Project where the detail was used Upton Maine Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.5.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-233 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the Maine DOT and adopted by the committee for bridges for semi integral abutment bridges. The pieces were match
cast with shear keys in the fabrication plant. The precast components were epoxy bonded in the field and post tensioned. Once the abutment cap
was completed, the box beams were set on top and keyed in using the approach slabs.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-234 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 2.5.3 B

Contact Name: Ronald Mauro Phone Number: 607-324-8454

Address: 107 Broadway E-mail: [email protected]
Hornell, NY 14843
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected FRP Superstructure to Abutment

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 248 over Bennett's Creek, BIN 1043150

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.5.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-235 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This project consisted of the replacement of a deteriorated reinforced concrete slab superstructure with an FRP superstructure. The new
superstructure was prefabricated in two pieces and was placed on rehabilitated reinforced concrete abutments. The detail above shows how the
new superstructure was anchored to the abutments using threaded stainless steel anchor bolts.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1998 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-236 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NMB Splice Sleeve Detail Number 2.5.3 C

Contact Name: Alvin C. Ericson Phone Number: 888-446-5376

Address: PO Box 367897 E-mail: [email protected]
Bonita Springs, FL 34136-7897
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Box Beam to Semi-Integral Abutment Stem

Name of Project where the detail was used

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.5.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-237 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used on a bridge in Massachusetts to create a semi-integral abutment structure. The beams were adjacent precast prestressed
butted box beams.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-238 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.6 Miscellaneous Superstructure Connections
This section focuses on connections of miscellaneous items not covered under
other sections in this chapter.

2.6.1 Utilities, Drainage Assemblies and other Appurtenances

No details were submitted by owner agencies for the connection of
utilities, drainage assemblies or other appurtenances to prefabricated
bridge elements. This does not mean that these connections are not
important, only that they are commonplace and not considered integral
parts of the bridge structure.

The collapse of several concrete panels on the Boston Central Artery

Tunnel underscores the importance of quality connection for these types
of connections. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued
a safety recommendation following their investigation into this collapse.
The cause of the collapse has been linked to failed connections that used
epoxy adhesive anchors.

The NTSB recommended that epoxy adhesive anchoring systems not be

used in connections that experience sustained tensile load because the
adhesives creep substantially under long-term loading. In extreme cases,
the anchors completely pull out. Designers should investigate other
anchoring systems that will perform under the anticipated conditions. The
designers should consider the type of loading, the environmental
conditions and the vibrations associated with the connections.

Connectors of particular concern are overhead hanger type systems such

as utility and drainage systems. Designers should investigate hanging
these items from the sides of beams, cross frames or additional utility
support members. There may be cases where overhead anchoring is
unavoidable. In these cases, designers should use the following
guidelines:
• For connections to steel elements, design supports using high
strength bolts. Bolts loaded in shear are preferred to bolts loaded
in tension.
• For connections to concrete elements, use anchors cast into the
overhead element. The ACI document entitled “Building Code
Requirements for Structural Concrete - ACI 318” is recommended
for the design of anchors embedded in concrete. Appendix D of
this document offers guidance on this subject [46].
• Specify anchors that do not use epoxy adhesive. Other anchor
types are also not appropriate for situations where vibrations may
be present. Designers should carefully evaluate any anchor if
vibrations are anticipated.
• If epoxy adhesive anchors are unavoidable, the designer should
investigate the long-term affects of the adhesive and specify
testing requirements to ensure the durability of the anchor.

Page 2-239 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 2.6.2 Barriers, Curbs and Railings
Section 2.1.1.4 covers connections of barriers and railing to full depth
precast concrete deck panels. In some instances, prefabricated barriers
and railings are attached to other elements such as cast-in-place
concrete decks, and even timber decks. Refer to Section 2.1.1.4 for more
information on barrier and railing connections.

The United States Department of Agriculture Forest Products Laboratory

(USDA FPL) has developed standard details for timber barriers attached
to timber bridges. This connection typically involves the used of bolts and
split ring connectors. A split ring connector is a steel casting that is
placed at the interface between two members loaded in shear. The
connector greatly improves the resistance of the connection by spreading
out the shear load to a larger area of wood. This essentially eliminates
the crushing of wood against the side of the steel shear bolt. There is a
significant amount of information on bridge railing connections at the
USDA FPL website. Users of this Manual are encouraged to visit the
Forest Products Laboratory website for more information on timber
bridges (www.fpl.fs.fed.us).

2.6.3 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of

Miscellaneous Superstructure Connections
The attachments of appurtenances, barriers and railings have different
performance requirements. Attachments under bridge decks are not as
exposed as barriers; however, these areas can be damp and subject to
corrosion. Anchorages for appurtenances should be hot dip galvanized,
according to ASTM A123 [48]. Designers may consider the use of
stainless steel anchors for improved performance.

Barriers, curbs and railings experience some of the most severe

exposure, especially in northern climates. Often the connection of a
barrier to the deck is located at the gutter line. The joint between the
barrier and the bridge deck should be protected from water infiltration. If
this is not feasible, anchors used for the connection should be either hot
dip galvanized according to ASTM A123 or made of stainless steel.

2.6.4 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

Exact timelines for construction are dependent on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and storage
areas. It is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction time
for the various systems discussed in this section.

Table 2.6.4-1 contains approximate installation times for the various

systems included in this section:

Page 2-240 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 System Minimum Comments
Installation
Time
Miscellaneous 1 hour Depending on the details,
appurtenances numerous connections can be
made in one day
Steel Barriers 1-2 Days Time is for a typical single span
bridge; larger bridges may take
longer
Precast Concrete 1-2 Days This is for a typical single span
Barriers bridge; larger bridges may take
longer
Cast-in-place 1-4 Days The time of construction is a
Concrete Barriers function of the number of pours
required to complete the installation
Table 2.6.4-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Miscellaneous
Superstructure Connections

2.6.5 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

The most important improvement to current practice is to cease the use of
overhead epoxy adhesive anchoring systems. The 2006 collapse of the
precast concrete roof panels in the Boston Central Artery Tunnel has
indicated the inability of these anchors to support long-term tension loads.

2.6.6 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Miscellaneous Superstructure

Connections
The following pages contain data sheets for the various miscellaneous
superstructure connections. This information was primarily gathered from
agencies that have developed and used the systems. Most data in the
sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors added text when
an agency did not supply all requested information. The owner agencies
also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization

Page 2-241 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 • Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 2-242 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 2.6.2 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Barrier to Deck

Name of Project where the detail was used N.H. Rte. 175-A Over Pemigewasset River in Holderness/Plymouth, NH

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-243 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This parapet was developed through a cooperative effort between the New Hampshire DOT and the Vermont AOT. The parapet design is based on
a similar Texas DOT cast in place parapet. The intent is to use this parapet on bridges in urban environments and where historic bridges need to be
replaced. The section has been static load tested to LRFD Performance Level 2 in a University of New Hampshire laboratory. Several different
opening shapes are proposed. This can be modified by changing the inserts in the steel forms (see photo below). This parapet has been used on
one bridge project so far. Several other projects are also proposed.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2007 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-244 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: South Carolina DOT Detail Number 2.6.2 B

Contact Name: Barry Bowers Phone Number: 803-737-4814

Address: Post Office Box 191 E-mail: [email protected]
Columbia, South Carolina 29202
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Prestressed Concrete Slab to Precast R. C. Barrier Parapet

Name of Project where the detail was used Maintenance Bridges

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-245 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
This detail is used in South Carolina. It is not known if the blockouts meet current crash testing criteria for snagging. Designers should consider
filling the blockouts with grout.

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Numerous Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 7 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-246 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 2.6.2 C

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast Parapet to CIP Deck on Double Tee

Name of Project where the detail was used Conceptual

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-247 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the Bridge Technical Committee of the Northeast Region of the PCI. The detail is part of the development of a new
bridge beam called the Next Beam (Northeast Extreme Tee). The intent of this new beam is to eliminate the need for deck forming, thereby saving
construction time. The top flange of the beam is intended as a form only. The cast-in-place deck is designed like a stringer bridge. The tees can
vary in width from 8 feet to 12 feet. The wearing surface can wither be bituminous or sacrificial concrete.

The overhang of the fascia tee allows the use of precast parapets. Any cast-in-place standard parapet can now be detailed as a precast parapet.
The typical horizontal construction joint in most parapets is replaced with a vertical construction joint. If standard shapes and reinforcing are used,
there should be no need for crash testing of this connection.

The following notes outline the typical construction sequence for this detail.
1. Erect the NEXT Beams
2. Place the precast parapet in a grout bed. Use plastic shims to adjust grade.
3. Grout keyway voids between parapet pieces.
4. place deck reinforcing and cast the deck using the parapet as a side form.
5. Seal the joint between the parapet and the deck pour.
6. Place wearing surface (is required)

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension x Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-248 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: USDA Forest Products Laboratory Detail Number 2.6.2 D

Contact Name: Jim Wacker Phone Number: 608-231-9224

Address: One Gifford Pinchot Drive E-mail: [email protected]
Madison, WI 53726
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Glulam wood railing to Glulam wood deck

Name of Project where the detail was used Standard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 2.6.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 2-249 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
The details provide the connection between the bridge railing and the glue laminated wood deck. This railing is has been crash tested to Test Level
4. Other railings are available on line. For more information on this bridge type and this connection, see the Manual entitled "Standard Plans for
Timber Bridge Superstructures - General Technical Report FPL-GTR-125" published by the United States Department of Agriculture Forest
Products Laboratory. It can be obtained at: www.fpl.fs.fed.us.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 2-250 Chapter 2: Superstructure Connections

 Chapter 3 – Substructure Connections
This chapter is devoted to connections in substructure systems. The chapter has been
broken out into typical substructure systems that are used on most bridges. These
systems include piers, abutments, and walls. The connections between substructure
elements that are directly connected to foundation elements (pile bents) will also be
covered in this chapter.

3.1 Pier Elements

Prefabricated pier elements have been used by many state agencies. This is due
to the difficulty of forming and pouring concrete high above the ground and the fact
that substructures offer opportunities for repetition. There can also be significant
savings by reducing construction time for substructure work over bodies of water or
near hazards such as power lines.

3.1.1 Precast Concrete Cap Beam Connections

The most common prefabricated elements in substructures are pier cap
beams. These elements are often the most difficult to construct using
cast-in-place concrete, where shoring and forming can become
significant.

Details presented in this manual were developed in states that are in low
to moderate seismic zones. Many of the connections depicted cannot
develop plastic hinges or do not include adequate confinement
reinforcement. Several details developed by the Northeast States PCI
Bridge Technical Committee may be appropriate for high seismic zones;
however at this time research to verify their seismic performance has not
been conducted and, therefore, they are still only recommended for
moderate seismic zones.

There is research underway to investigate designs for prefabricated

connections in high seismic zones. Users of this Manual should keep
abreast of this research as it is completed. See Section 1.5 of this
Manual for more information on this topic.

3.1.1.1 Connection to Cast-in-Place Concrete Columns and Piles

There have been several projects where precast concrete pier caps
were connected to cast-in-place concrete columns and piles. The
major issue with this approach is that the tolerance of the cast-in-
place columns and piles needs to be addressed in the connection.
Templates can be used to provide good fit-up in the field. Details
using large blockouts in the pier cap element have been successfully
built.

Texas DOT has built connections that employ standard post-

tensioning ducts to create voids for projecting reinforcing steel. These
ducts, when combined with additional confinement reinforcing in the
pier cap and grouted, can develop significant bending moment
capacity; however research to verify their performance in moderate-
to-high seismic regions has not been completed [5]. More information
on this connection can be found in the Texas DOT research report

Page 3-1 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 Number 1748-1 entitled “Development of a Precast Bent Cap System”
[49]. Other states have used recessed grouted cap pockets to
develop semi-moment connections, or simple bolted connections that
would be considered a pinned connection.

3.1.1.2 Connection to Precast Columns

At least one state has constructed a pier bent using both precast
concrete pier caps with precast concrete columns. Florida DOT built
a large bridge called the Edison Bridge in Lee County. Figure 3.1.1.2-
1 shows the completed structure.

Figure 3.1.1.2-1 Edison Bridge

(Photo courtesy of Florida DOT)

The Edison bridge pier connections used proprietary grouted splice

couplers to create moment connections between the pieces. The
couplers were embedded in the precast components and filled with
grout after installation. The couplers used are proprietary; however
there are multiple manufacturers of this type of coupler. This means
that they can be used on federally funded projects. See section
1.4.2.1 for more information on these couplers.

The columns and pier caps

had unique shapes that
were developed to reduce
shipping and lifting weight
of the elements. The
columns were cast in an H
shape, and the cap an
inverted U shape. Figure
3.1.1.2-2 shows the column
section during casting.

Figure 3.1.1.2-2 Pier Column Section

(Photo courtesy of Florida DOT)

Page 3-2 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.1.1.3 Connection to Steel Piles (pile bents)
Many states build simple pier structures that consist of driven steel
piles supporting a reinforced concrete pile cap. These piers are
referred to as pile bents.

Several states have developed details for prefabricated reinforced

concrete bent caps. One option for the connection of the bent cap to
the steel piles is a welded connection. The precast bent cap is built
with embedded steel plates that are anchored in the precast bent with
welded studs. After pile driving is complete, the steel piles are cut off
to the proper elevation. The bent cap is placed over the piles and
welded in place.

Some pile bents are constructed with hollow pipe piles. In this case,
the connection of the pipe pile to the cap can be made by inserting
reinforcing steel or an anchor rod into a void in the precast pile cap
and the void in the pipe pile. A cast-in-place concrete closure pour in
the pier cap void and the top of the hollow steel pile completes the
connection.

3.1.1.4 Connection to Precast Concrete Piles (pile bents)

There are several details for connections of precast concrete pile caps
to precast concrete piles. Most of these connections involve grouting
the pile into a void in the pier cap. Some states use reinforcing in this
connection.

Florida DOT uses large hollow precast piles for viaduct structures.
The connection of these piles to the precast pier cap is similar to the
connection of a precast pier cap to a hollow steel pile. A reinforced
closure pour is used to connect the two elements.

3.1.1.5 Connection of Precast Concrete Cap to Precast Concrete Cap

There are several reasons to construct precast pier caps in several
pieces and connect them in the field. On wide bridges, it may be
desirable to have a very wide pier cap. Shipping limitations
(dimensions) may require that the cap be manufactured in multiple
pieces. Also, if the cap pieces are very heavy, it may be desirable to
build the cap in multiple pieces to limit the size of cranes on site.
Another reason to use multiple cap pieces is to facilitate fit up in the
field. Connecting a precast cap to three or more columns is not
impossible, but it is easier to connect to two columns. Designers
should consider incorporating open joints in pier cap designs. This
will facilitate the erection of caps and reduce the thermal forces in the
pier bents.

One of the details submitted by the Northeast PCI Bridge Technical

Committee shows a cast-in-place closure pour. This is done because
it is very difficult to erect two components with a horizontal connection
using grouted reinforcing bar couplers. The time to cure a closure
pour might seem to be a problem with accelerated construction

Page 3-3 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 methods; however if detailed properly, this connection can be
designed to support only loads placed on the structure after erection
of the beams. This means that the erection process can proceed
while this connection is formed, poured and cured.

3.1.2 Precast Concrete Column Connections

3.1.2.1 Connection of Column to Column
Few states have designed bridges with prefabricated pier column
connections. The connections were made by using the match cast
method of construction combined with post-tensioning. The joints are
epoxy bonded together and the post-tensioning completes the joint.

The details for column connections that are proposed by the

Northeast States PCI Bridge Technical Committee could also be used
for this connection. This type of connection uses grouted reinforcing
splice couplers to connect the reinforcing from one element to the
next. This type of connection has been used in stadium construction
projects. See Section 3.1.1.2 for more information on this type of
connection.

3.1.3 Wall Pier Connections

3.1.3.1 Connection of Precast Wall to Precast Footing
The Northeast States PCI Bridge Technical Committee has developed
details for a precast concrete wall pier. While this type of structure
has not been constructed yet, a precast cantilever wall abutment has
been successfully built. The details are essentially the same except
the structure does not support unbalanced soil loads. The pier
elements can be connected using grouted shear keys or simply
sealed to prevent moisture infiltration. See Section 3.2.1 for more
information on these connections.

Other connections described in this section for precast pier columns

can easily be applied to wall piers. For instance, a precast wall pier
element can be connected to a cast-in-place concrete footing as
described in Section 3.1.4.1 below.

3.1.4 Precast Concrete Column to Footing Connections

3.1.4.1 Connection to Cast-in-Place Concrete Footing
The connection of a precast pier column element to a cast-in-place
concrete footing can be made using two approaches. The state of
Washington developed a detail that involved casting the footing under
the precast column element, which had reinforcing projecting from the
base. The column was braced in position on top of a temporary
support in the middle of the column. The footing was simply formed
and poured around the projecting column reinforcement.

The second method of making this connection is by the use of

mechanical connectors or post-tensioning. In this case, the location
of the mechanical devices and/or post-tensioning needs to be
carefully coordinated. Tolerances need to be established and

Page 3-4 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 specified so that the field fit-up is successful. See Section 1.7 for
more discussion on tolerances.

3.1.4.2 Connection to Precast Concrete Footing

To the knowledge of the authors of this manual, the connection of a
precast column element to a precast footing element has not been
used on a bridge project in the United States. Section 3.2.1.1 will
discuss the connection of cantilever wall elements to precast footings
(which has been used on at least one bridge project). This type of
connection is essentially the same as a pier column connection, since
it is called on to provide a moment splice.

The Northeast States PCI Bridge Technical Committee has developed

standard details for this connection that use grouted reinforcing splice
couplers. These connections are based on details used in building
and parking garage construction, where they have been used
successfully. The detail has been classified as conceptual in this
manual; however, based on the performance of abutment connections
and its use in other industries; it should be a reliable and useful
connection for piers.

As with any mechanical splice connection, the tolerances of the

mechanical connectors need to be specified. See Section 1.7 for
more discussion on tolerances.

3.1.5 Grade Control and Tolerances

The construction of prefabricated pier elements can lead to problems with
grade and horizontal control. Minor grade and alignment problems can
be corrected in other connections above the pier (haunches in deck pour
forming for example); however it is always desirable to make adjustment
for grade as the construction progresses. All of the connections shown in
the manual have grout beds or cast-in-place closer pours which can be
used to make minor adjustment to grade. This is commonly done by
means of small shim packs that are placed between the elements being
connected. Often these shims are made of polymer sheets and are left in
place in the finished structure. Steel shims should be avoided because
they would represent a hard point that may attract stresses as the
structure is loaded, which could lead to spalling of the precast elements.

The use of mechanical connectors or post-tensioning requires more

careful attention to tolerances in the precast process. Two things can be
done to ensure proper fit-up in the field. If post-tensioning is specified,
the connections can be match cast to minimize field fit-up problems. If
grouted reinforcing splice couplers are used between two precast
elements, the designer can specify that the connections be dry connected
in the shop to ensure proper fit.

See Section 1.7 for more discussion on tolerances.

Page 3-5 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.1.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of
Prefabricated Pier Systems
The connections shown in the manual have proven to be quite durable.
During the collection of data for this manual, several precast pier projects
were identified that did not perform well. These involved the use of steel
plate connectors in high corrosion environments.

To date, connections using grouted joints have performed very well. For
example, the Edison Bridge in Lee County Florida has been in service for
over 15 years and is in very good condition. The connections on this
bridge are in one of the most severe environments in the country.

Several details included in this manual consist of exposed welded plate

connections. These connections should either be used in non-corrosive
environments, or coated after welding to prevent future corrosion.

3.1.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

Exact timelines for construction are dependent on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and storage
areas. It is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction time
for the various systems discussed in this section.

Table 3.1.7-1 contains approximate installation times for the various pier
systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time
Grouted Duct or 1 Day or This includes bracing and grouting.
Reinforcing Splice less
Coupler
Connections
Blockout closure 2 Days Two days are required for the
pour connections closure pour concrete (high early
strength) to attain at least enough
strength to allow for construction to
progress.
Post-Tensioning 3 Days This includes connecting the
Systems elements with epoxy, placement of
the post-tensioning strand or rod,
and grouting of the ducts.
Table 3.1.7-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Pier
Connection Systems

3.1.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

To date, grouted connections and closure pour systems on precast piers
have been very successful and durable. The one major hurdle that needs
to be addressed is the development of pier connections in high seismic
regions. Most of the connections presented in this manual are only
applicable to low to moderate seismic regions where plastic hinging of

Page 3-6 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 column elements in not required until research proves otherwise.
Research is underway to develop connections that can be used in high
seismic regions.

3.1.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Pier Systems

The following pages contain data sheets for the various prefabricated pier
systems. This information was primarily gathered from agencies that
have developed and used the systems. Most data in the sheets were
provided by the owner agency; the authors added text when an agency
did not supply all requested information. The owner agencies also
provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.

Page 3-7 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 • Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 3-8 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: MnDOT Bridge Office Detail Number 3.1.1.1 A

Contact Name: Joseph M. Fishbein, P.E. Phone Number: 651-747-2196

Address: 3485 Hadley Avenue N. E-mail: [email protected]
Oakdale, MN 55128
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast pier cap to Round CIP piles

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge 13004, TH 8 over Center Lake Channel, Center City, MN

Connection Details: Manual Reference: Section 3.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-9 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection between precast pier cap and round CIP piles for pile-bent pier. Cap was precast with oversized holes for piles, and smaller holes
between pile blockouts and top of cap were included for grouting. After piles were installed, the cap was placed over piles, leveled into position, and
high-strength grout injected from top of cap through grouting holes. Rebar inside the CIP piles projected into the pier cap for additional bonding.
Few problems were reported from the field. This approach required careful control of pile locations, which was accomplished by using a template,
as well as waiting to excavate final slope contour until after piles were driven.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 10 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-10 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.1.1.1 B

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Pier Cap to Cast-in-place Concrete Column

Name of Project where the detail was used Lake Belton

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-11 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The photo shown below was taken during construction. The photo shows the pier cap being lowered onto the cast-in-place concrete columns. The
contractor used shims to set the grades of the caps. The ducts run from the bottom to a point near the top of the cap. This was done to avoid
interference with the large amount of top reinforcing in the cap. The ducts are standard post tensioning ducts.

The contractor used a man-lift (just off the photo to the left) to facilitate this installation. A worker guided the bars into the duct openings.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 2007 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 3+ Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-12 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.1.1.1 C

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Pier Cap to Cast-in-place Concrete Column

Name of Project where the detail was used Lake Ray Hubbard

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-13 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The photos shown below were taken during construction. The photo on the left shows the pier cap being lowered onto the cast-in-place concrete
columns. The contractor used a cap leveling system that was strapped to the outside columns (green jacket and jacks) that was used to set the cap
grades.

The photo on the right is the cap pocket during fabrication. The ducts run from the bottom to the top of the cap. The ducts are standard post
tensioning ducts.

Editor's Notes

The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 2007 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 3+ Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-14 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Wyoming DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.1 D

Contact Name: Gregg Fredrick Phone Number: 307 777 4427

Address: 5300 Bishop Blvd E-mail: [email protected]
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Concrete Bent Cap to Cast in Place Concrete Column

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge over BNSF Railroad (Wyoming Drawing Number 7024)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-15 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 5 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-16 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Florida DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.2 A

Contact Name: Thomas Andres Phone Number: 850-414-4269

Address: 605 Suwannee Street, MS 33 E-mail: [email protected]
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Pier Column to Precast Pier Cap

Name of Project where the detail was used Edison Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-17 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This Connection was made with a steel grouted reinforcing bar splicer system.

The grouted splicers can develop over 150% of bar yield. Quality control on bar and splicer locations are critical. The splicers
can be oversized to accommodate approximately 1/2" of tolerance. The only design effect is that the bars must be moved
closer to the center of the members in order to maintain cover around the splicers (approx. 1"). This design incorporates an H
shaped column section and a U shaped cap section to reduce weight. Weight of cap did not control crane requirements
(approx. same weight as beams). Contractor's labor and insurance costs less due to reduced time on the water.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 1992 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? one Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-18 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.1.1.2 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast Cap Beam to Precast column

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-19 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges with multi-column bent piers. Details similar to these have been used in precast parking
garage and stadium projects. The performance information listed below is based on these structures. The grouted splicers can be placed in the
column or the cap beam. The cap beam is shimmed to grade and grouted. Square, hexagonal and octagonal columns are preferred over round
columns because they can be cast in the flat position. Long cap beams may require a joint. This joint can be left open in order to control thermal
forces, or can be connected with a small closure pour after placement. The closure pour is shown.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-20 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Arora & Associates, P.C. Detail Number 3.1.1.2 C

Contact Name: Alan Haring, P.E. Phone Number: (609)219-6785

Address: 3120 Princeton Pike E-mail: [email protected]
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Pier Column to Cast in place footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 70 over Manasquan River, Brielle, NJ

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-21 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Connection provides a means of connecting the precast column segments to precast cap beams. This allows for the accelerated construction of
the piers above the footing level using precast concrete construction. The anchorage devices specified in the contract plans were proprietary. The
project was designed with Inclined columns with a trumpet shaped anchorages, which allowed strand to be placed and grouted after the column has
been erected. Temporary threaded PT bars were used to support the columns until the cap beams were placed.

The Contractor substituted alternative details, which eliminated temporary column post-tensioning. A single full-height column section was used.
All post tensioning was accomplished with threaded PT bars in place of the strand tendons. Once the precast cap beam was installed, the cap was
sealed with a cast-in-place concrete cap.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)(new construction)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 3 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 5 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-22 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Utah DOT via CME Associates, Inc. Detail Number 3.1.1.2.D

Contact Name: Michael P. Culmo, P.E. Phone Number: 860-290-4100

Address: 333 East River Drive, Suite 400 E-mail: [email protected]
East Hartford, CT 06108
Detail Classification 1

Components Connected Precast Pier Column to Precast Cap Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Under Development

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-23 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The UTAH DOT is currently in the process of developing standard details for prefabricated bridge elements. The detail depicted is based on
several successful details that are included in the manual. The success of the other projects warranted the Level 1 detail classification. The
details below depict one of the preliminary pier configurations. Others are also being developed.

CME Associates is developing the standard details; therefore they are listed as the contact.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-24 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.1.1.3 A

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete pier cap to Steel Pipe foundation pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-25 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The three span Boone County IBRC Project included two piers that consisted of 16" diameter steel pipe pile filled with concrete with a precast
concrete pier cap. The connection between the pipe pile and the precast cap was made with hooked #8 bars cast into the pipe pile concrete and
extending into the void created in the pier cap by the 21" diameter corrugated metal pipe. The pile were driven with a plan end tolerance of 2" in
any horizontal direction to ensure that the pile-cap connection would fit together. The voids were filled with a early high strength concrete that
exhibited low shrinkage properties.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Once Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-26 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Wyoming DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.3 B

Contact Name: Gregg Fredrick Phone Number: 307 777 4427

Address: 5300 Bishop Blvd E-mail: [email protected]
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concrete Bent Cap to Driven Steel H Piling

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge over Crow Creek (Wyoming Drawing Number 6291)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-27 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Steel plates with shear studs are cast at the pile locations in the bottom of the pier cap. In the field the steel H piles are driven and then cut off level
at the elevation of the bottom of the cap. The cap is set on the H piles and then the H piles are field welded to the bottom of the steel plates.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-28 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Florida DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.4 A

Contact Name: Thomas Andres Phone Number: 850-414-4269

Address: 605 Suwannee Street, MS 33 E-mail: [email protected]
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected pile cap to Hollow P/S concrete square pile

Name of Project where the detail was used I-10 Escambia Bay Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-29 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Fit-up issue: pile placement tolerance is important. In order to fit prefabricated pile cap, only 3" lateral tolerance is allowed for each pile.

Design Issue: Consider lateral confining pressure of confined hole; and connection rebar development length for confined concrete.

Durability issues: Shrinkage cracks at pile cap/pile interface especially at top surface of pile cap. Corrosion concern due to shrinkage cracks.
Precast element has a tendency to pull water from fresh concrete grout. There are quite a few vertical cracks observed around top of piles after
concrete placement. Possible cause: Thermal expansion of concrete.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 6 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 6 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-30 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Florida DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.4 B

Contact Name: Thomas Andres Phone Number: 850-414-4269

Address: 605 Suwannee Street, MS 33 E-mail: [email protected]
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected P/S concrete cylinder pile to Precast pile cap

Name of Project where the detail was used St George Island Bridge, Florida

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-31 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Water hammer problem on cylinder piles.

Concrete spalling at joints between cylinder segments

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 50 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 5+- Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-32 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Louisiana DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.4 C

Contact Name: Paul Fossier Phone Number: (225) 379-1323

Address: Louisiana Department of Transportation E-mail: [email protected]
1201 Capitol Access RD
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9245 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Pier Cap to Precast Piles

Name of Project where the detail was used Louisiana Forest Highway Kisatchie National Forest Clear Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-33 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The pier to pile connection is designed as a pinned connection that transfers lateral forces and axial compression.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-34 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: South Carolina DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.4 D

Contact Name: Barry Bowers Phone Number: 803-737-4814

Address: Post Office Box 191 E-mail: [email protected]
Columbia, South Carolina 29202
Detail Classigication Level 2

Components Connected Precast R. C. Bent Cap to Prestressed Concrete Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Carolina Bays Parkway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-35 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? One Project Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Maybe (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-36 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: South Carolina DOT Detail Number 3.1.1.4 E

Contact Name: Barry Bowers Phone Number: 803-737-4814

Address: Post Office Box 191 E-mail: [email protected]
Columbia, South Carolina 29202
Detail Classigication Level 2

Components Connected Precast R. C. Bent Cap to Prestressed Concrete Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Conway Bypass

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-37 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2000 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? One Project Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Maybe (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-38 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.1.1.4 F

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Pier Cap to Precast Concrete Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Redfish Bay

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-39 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Note: The photos shown below were taken during construction. The photo on the left shows the pier cap after being set into positiong on
the precast concrete piles. The contractor used a cap leveling system that was strapped to the outside columns (right photo) that was used to set
the cap grades.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 3+ Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-40 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.1.1.5 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast Cap Beam to Precast Cap Beam

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.1.5 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-41 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges with multi-column bent piers. Details similar to these have been used in precast parking
garage and stadium projects. The performance information listed below is based on these structures. The grouted splicers can be placed in the
cap beam. The cap beam is shimmed to grade and grouted. Long cap beams may require a joint due to shipping and weight limitations.

This connection has never been used on a bridge; however it is quite common in the vertical construction industry.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? never Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-42 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 3.1.2.1 A

Contact Name: Nicolas A. Choubah Phone Number: (845) 431-7924

Address: Regional Structures Group E-mail: [email protected]
4 Burnett Blvd.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concrete Pier Column to Precast Concrete Pier Column

Name of Project where the detail was used Replacement of I-287 Viaduct over the Saw Mill River Parkway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.2.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-43 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Precast post-tensioned piers were used to speed up the construction. Due to smaller footprint at bottom, this type of pier can be used for viaducts
or for elevated rail or expressways in the median of an existing roadway section. This approach is expensive for a small bridge, but it is fast and
economical for multiple span bridges with heavy traffic. The subject bridge had 8 bents with 3 piers each = 24 piers.

The detail shown is the connection between adjacent pier segments. Joints were sealed and bonded with epoxy adhesive. Shear was
transferred between pieces by means of shear keys in the precast pieces.

PT rods were embedded in the cast in place footing and spliced with couplers at several levels. Upon the completion of the installation of all
segments, the entire pier was post tensioned.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1997 Condition at last inspection (if known) Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 4 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 4 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-44 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Utah DOT via CME Associates, Inc. Detail Number 3.1.2.1.B

Contact Name: Michael P. Culmo, P.E. Phone Number: 860-290-4100

Address: 333 East River Drive, Suite 400 E-mail: [email protected]
East Hartford, CT 06108
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Pier Column Section to Precast Pier Column Section

Name of Project where the detail was used Under Development

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.2.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-45 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The UTAH DOT is currently in the process of developing standard details for prefabricated bridge elements. The detail depicted is based on
several successful details that are included in the manual. The success of the other projects warranted the Level 1 detail classification. The
details below depict one of the preliminary pier configurations. Others are also being developed.

CME Associates is developing the standard details; therefore they are listed as the contact.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-46 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.1.3.1 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast spread footing to Precast Wall Pier Stem

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-47 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges with wall piers. This detail is very similar to an abutment detail that was sucessfully built in
Epping, New Hampshire. The performance information listed below is based on the Epping Bridge Abutment. Leveling bolts are used in the
corners to set grade, and a small aggregate concrete is poured through ports to fill the void under the footing. The design of the footings and walls
are the same as cast-in-place concrete construction. Wall pier footings and stems are designed as one-way cantilevers; therefore the joints
between the pieces need not be reinforced. Grouted keys or foam filled joints are acceptable.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2001 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-48 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Florida DOT Detail Number 3.1.4.1 A

Contact Name: Thomas Andres Phone Number: 850-414-4269

Address: 605 Suwannee Street, MS 33 E-mail: [email protected]
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Cast-in-place footing to Precast Pier Column

Name of Project where the detail was used Edison Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-49 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This Connection was made with a steel grouted reinforcing bar splicer system. The grouted splicers can develop over 150% of
bar yield.

Quality control on bar and splicer locations are critical. The splicers can be oversized to accommodate approximately 1/2" of
tolerance.
The only design effect is that the bars must be moved closer to the center of the members in order to maintain cover around the
splicers (approx. 1").

This design incorporates an H shaped column section to reduce weight. Contractor's labor and insurance costs less due to
reduced time on the water.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 1992 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? One Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-50 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: New York State DOT Detail Number 3.1.4.1 B

Contact Name: Nicolas A. Choubah Phone Number: (845) 431-7924

Address: Regional Structures Group E-mail: [email protected]
4 Burnett Blvd.
Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concrete Pier Column to CIP Concrete Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Replacement of I-287 Viaduct over the Saw Mill River Parkway

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-51 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Precast post-tensioned pier were used to speed up the construction.
Due to smaller footprint at bottom, this type of pier can be used for
viaducts or for elevated rail or expressways in the median of an
existing roadway section. This approach is expensive for a small
bridge, but it is fast and economical for multiple span bridges with
heavy traffic. The subject bridge had 8 bents with 3 piers each = 24
piers.

The detail shown is the connection between the bottom pier segment
and the footing. The piece was placed in a grout bed. Intermediate
joints were connected sealed and bonded with epoxy adhesive.
Shear was transferred between pieces by means of shear keys in the
precast pieces.

PT rods were embedded in the cast in place footing and spliced with
couplers at several levels. Upon the completion of the installation of
all segments, the entire pier was post tensioned.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 1997 Condition at last inspection (if known) Very Good
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection 2005
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 4 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 4 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-52 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: WSDOT - Bridge Office Detail Number 3.1.4.1 C

Contact Name: John Olk, P.E. Phone Number: 360-705-7395

Address: P O Box 47340 E-mail: [email protected]
Olympia, WA 98504
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Rectangular Column to Cast in Place Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used I-405, Bellevue Access Transit NE 4th / NE 6th

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-53 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection of a precast concrete column, temporarily supported, to a cast in place footing. This details can be used for any type of cast in place
column. The column is precast with a embedded 6x6x3/4 steel angle that is used to support the column temporarily. The angle bears on a 4 by 4
foot, 8 inch concrete pad. The photo below shows the columns in the field, with a temporary concrete pad in the lower left.

Column Bottom View

Column Top View

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2003 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-54 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Arora & Associates, P.C. Detail Number 3.1.4.1 D

Contact Name: Alan Haring, P.E. Phone Number: (609)219-6785

Address: 3120 Princeton Pike E-mail: [email protected]
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Pier Column to Cast in place footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 70 over Manasquan River, Brielle, NJ

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-55 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection provides a means of connecting the precast column segments to the cast-in-place footing. This allows for the accelerated construction
of the piers above the footing level using precast concrete construction. The anchorage devices specified in the contract plans are proprietary. The
project was designed with Inclined columns with a trumpet shaped anchorages, which allowed strand to be placed and grouted after the column has
been erected. Temporary threaded PT bars were used to support the columns until the cap beams were placed.

The Contractor substituted alternative details, which eliminated temporary column post-tensioning. A single full-height column section was used.
All post tensioning was accomplished with threaded PT bars in place of the strand tendons.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)(new construction)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 3 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 5 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-56 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.1.4.2 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast Column to Precast spread footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-57 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges with multi-column bent piers. This detail is very similar to an abutment detail that was
sucessfully built in Epping, New Hampshire. The performance information listed below is based on the Epping Bridge Abutment. The leveling bolts
are used to set grade. After placement, the void under the footing is grouted through ports in the footing. The leveling bolt access holes are also
grouted. The grouted splicers can be placed in the column or the footing. The columns are shimmed to grade and grouted. Square, hexagonal and
octagonal columns are preferred over round columns because they can be cast in the flat position.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? many Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 8 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-58 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Utah DOT via CME Associates, Inc. Detail Number 3.1.4.2 B

Contact Name: Michael P. Culmo, P.E. Phone Number: 860-290-4100

Address: 333 East River Drive, Suite 400 E-mail: [email protected]
East Hartford, CT 06108
Detail Classification 1

Components Connected Precast Column to Precast spread footing

Name of Project where the detail was used

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.1.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-59 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

The UTAH DOT is currently in the process of developing standard details for prefabricated bridge elements. The detail depicted is based on
several successful details that are included in the manual. The success of the other projects warranted the Level 1 detail classification. The
details below depict one of the preliminary pier configurations. Others are also being developed.

CME Associates is developing the standard details; therefore they are listed as the contact.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 7 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-60 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.2 Abutment Systems
Most states have not attempted prefabricated abutment designs; however several
have had very successful projects. Abutment construction can be a slow process;
therefore prefabrication offers an opportunity to greatly reduce the overall project
time. There are different types of abutments in use today in the United States.
Integral and semi-integral abutments are gaining popularity over conventional free
standing wall abutments. Both types of abutments have been built using
prefabricated elements; therefore designers can detail prefabricated abutments for
virtually any abutment configuration that is in use today.

The spread footings and other substructure components for the Epping Bridge in
New Hampshire were fabricated in segments as determined by the contractor and
precaster to facilitate shipping and handling, and were standardized to reduce
fabrication costs. The precaster used a template in the plant fabrication to ensure
adequate tolerances between the abutments, wingwalls, and footing segments.
The contractor developed the assembly plan.

Backfilling Options:
All abutments require some level of filling. Earth placement can be time
consuming; however there are some methods that can be employed to
reduce filling times.

One method is to use flowable fill for the backfill soils. Flowable fill is a
mixture of sand, water and minor amounts of cement. It can be installed
without compaction since it is in a semi-liquid state when placed.
Therefore, flowable fill can dramatically reduce the amount of time to
complete the backfilling. The only disadvantages are that the backfill
area needs to be contained or formed so the fill does not spill out, and the
material cost is somewhat higher than granular backfills. Designers
should also note that flowable fills have different soil properties than
compacted fill, which will affect the design of the abutments. The fill
generally has a slightly higher unit weight when placed (approximately
125 pcf). Once set, the fill has very high passive pressure resistance
since it is essentially a concrete product. For this reason, it should not be
used behind integral abutments where abutment movement could
generate large passive pressures against the fill.

Another method for reducing backfilling times is to use foam block fill
materials. These blocks are normally made with expanded polystyrene.
They are very lightweight and easy to install. The blocks are simply
stacked behind the abutment. This system can greatly reduce the forces
acting on the abutment stems; however there is also a reduction in
overturning resistance on the top of the footings. The disadvantages to
this system is that there needs to be a certain amount of fill placed over
the blocks to support wheel loads, the system can float out of the ground
if there is a high water table, the system needs to be waterproofed
against certain types of spills, and they can be expensive when compared
to conventional granular fills.

On an accelerated construction project, it may be preferable to allow one

or both of these backfilling methods in combination with conventional

Page 3-61 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 granular backfill. The contractor can then choose whether or not to use
the compacted granular fill or one of these methods.

3.2.1 Cantilever Wall Abutments

Cantilever abutments serve two purposes. They need to retain the soils
behind the ends of the bridge and they need to support the bridge
superstructure. Some wall abutments are referred to as stub abutments.
These abutments are made as short as possible and are installed at the
top of fill embankments. Stub abutments usually only retain soils that are
slightly higher than the superstructure thickness. Stub abutments can be
very economical; however they tend to increase the length of the end
spans. Other wall abutments can be much taller and are often
constructed to the full height of the crossing. Full height abutments are
more difficult to build; however they tend to reduce the length of the end
spans.

The New Hampshire DOT has constructed one prefabricated bridge in

Epping, New Hampshire, using precast concrete wall abutments. The
abutments were designed as conventional cast-in-place concrete
abutments; however the construction joints were replaced with
connections that used grouted reinforcing splice couplers. Full height
abutments were used to reduce the main span length. Both abutments
were constructed in less than three (3) days once the excavation was
complete. The details on the Epping Bridge can easily be used for any
bridge since the connections simply emulate a cast-in-place concrete
construction joint. See the Case Study of this bridge in Appendix D for
more information on this bridge.

3.2.1.1 Precast Abutment Stem to Precast Footing Connection

Spread footings provide significant speed and simplicity to bridge
construction when soil conditions permit their use. At least one state
has built a prefabricated abutment wall structure that was supported
on precast concrete footings. This was the Epping Bridge in New
Hampshire. The connection was made using grouted reinforcing
splice couplers. The splice was set in a recessed pocket in the
footing. This pocket may not be necessary for shear; however it was
used to provide head for flowing the grout into the joint. The same
precast producer constructed both elements; therefore the fit-up of the
couplers was not a problem.

3.2.1.2 Precast Backwall to Abutment Stem Connection

Backwalls are primarily used to support the soil directly behind the
beam ends. Often they are also used to support concrete approach
slabs.

The connection of a precast concrete backwall to a precast concrete

abutment stem can be made in a similar fashion as the stem to footing
connection described in Section 3.2.1.1 above. Grouted reinforcing
splice couplers can be used to provide a moment connection for these
elements. Other typical connection methods can also be used for this
element. See Section 1.4 for more information on connection options.

Page 3-62 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.2.1.3 Precast Breastwall (cheekwall) to Abutment Stem Connections
Breastwalls or cheekwalls are often used as a decorative element to
conceal the ends of the beams at the corners of the abutments.
Some states used these elements to restrain the superstructure from
seismic forces.

The connection of a precast concrete breastwall to a precast concrete

abutment stem can be made in a similar fashion as the stem to footing
connection described in Section 3.2.1.1 above. Grouted reinforcing
splice couplers can be used to provide a moment connection for these
elements. Other typical connection methods can also be used for this
element. See Section 1.4 for more information on connection options.

3.2.2 Spill-through Abutments

The intent of spill-through abutments is to reduce the amount of soil
pressure on the abutment by installing large voids in the stem. Spill-
through abutments are similar to piers except the majority of the structure
is below grade. Information in Section 3.1 can be used for prefabricated
bridges with spill-through abutments.

3.2.3 Precast Concrete Integral Abutments

Integral abutments get their name because the abutment structure is
made integral with the superstructure elements. There are two major
advantages for the use of integral abutments:
• Integral abutments do not normally have deck joints. This
eliminates one of the most common deterioration areas on
bridges.
• Integral abutments transfer the soil forces into the bridge
superstructure. The superstructure has tremendous available
capacity; therefore this usually has no affect on the superstructure
design. Integral abutments are normally supported on a single
row of piles that are designed to move with the bridge during
thermal cycles. The result of this approach is that the abutment
does not need a spread footing or multiple rows of piles to resist
the overturning soil forces.

There are two types of integral abutments. The most common is a fully
integral abutment where the connection to the superstructure is a full
moment connection. The second type of integral abutment is a semi-
integral abutment where the moment connection is replaced with a pinned
connection that allows rotation of the superstructure with respect to the
substructure. See Section 2.5 for information on the connection of the
superstructure to integral abutments.

3.2.3.1 Connection Between Abutment Stem or Cap and Steel Piles

There are several options for connecting precast concrete abutment
stems or caps to steel piles. Several states have cast the abutment
caps with anchored steel plates that can be field welded to the piles
after they are cut off to the proper elevation.

Page 3-63 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 Other states embed the piles in large pockets in the precast abutment
stem element. After placement over the piles, the void is filled with
non-shrink grout or concrete.

3.2.3.2 Connection Between Abutment Stem or Cap and Concrete Piles

There are several options for connecting a precast concrete abutment
stem or cap to concrete piles. The first method is to drill and grout
reinforcing bars into the top of the pile, and insert these bars into
grouted tube couplers in the abutment stem element.

Another option is to embed the piles into large pockets in the precast
abutment stem element. After placement over the piles, the void is
filled with non-shrink grout or concrete.

3.2.3.3 Connection Between Adjacent Abutment Stems or Caps

In some cases, the integral abutment stem or cap will need to be
manufactured in several pieces due to shipping and crane limitations.
The Maine DOT built several prefabricated integral abutment bridges
with two abutment pieces that were match cast and post-tensioned in
the field.

Small closure pours could also be used for this connection since the
curing of the closure pour concrete would most likely not restrict the
continuation of the bridge construction.

3.2.4 Miscellaneous Abutment Connections

3.2.4.1 Flying Wingwalls
Flying wingwalls are small retaining walls that project from abutment
stems. These walls do not have footings or any vertical support. The
soil forces are transferred to the abutment stem by means of a vertical
moment connection.

Several states have used prefabricated flying wingwalls. Wyoming

DOT has used welded plate connection. Plates were embedded and
anchored in the elements. During installation, the plates were field
welded together. Maine DOT used a match cast piece combined with
post-tensioning. This was done because the abutments were
constructed with two abutment stem elements in order to reduce
shipping and lifting weight. The addition of the flying wingwall pieces
to the process of constructing the abutments was not significant.

3.2.4.2 Approach Slabs

Approach slabs are used to prevent the “bump at the end of the
bridge” that results from settlement of the approach roadway fills
directly behind the abutments. The size of approach slabs vary from
state to state. Many states use nominal length approach slabs of
approximately 10 to 15 feet in length. These slabs are designed to
span from the rear face of the abutment to the roadway approach
embankment.

Page 3-64 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 The connection of the approach slab to the abutment is often detailed
as pinned connection with minimal reinforcing steel. Maine DOT has
prefabricated approach slabs for several bridges. The Maine details
are similar to the details shown in this manual from the New
Hampshire DOT. The slabs were simply pinned to the abutments by
means of simple dowel bars. The other end of the slab was simply set
on compacted fill.

3.2.5 Grade Control and Tolerances

As with pier systems, the construction of prefabricated abutment
elements can lead to problems with grade and horizontal control. Minor
grade and alignment problems can be corrected in other connections
above the abutment (haunches in deck pour forming for example);
however it is always desirable to make adjustment for grade as the
construction progresses. Some of the connections shown in the manual
have grout beds or cast-in-place closure pours which can be used to
make minor adjustment to grade. This is commonly done by means of
small shim packs that are placed between the elements being connected.
Often these shims are made of polymer sheets, and are left in place in
the finished structure. Steel shims should be avoided because they
would represent a hard point that may attract stresses as the structure is
loaded, which could lead to spalling of the precast elements.

The use of mechanical connectors requires more careful attention to

tolerances in the precast process. If grouted reinforcing splice couplers
are used between two precast elements, the designer can specify that the
connections be dry connected in the shop to ensure proper fit.

See Section 1.7 for more discussion on tolerances.

3.2.6 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of

Prefabricated Abutment Systems
Generally the abutment connections shown in the manual are relatively
new; therefore do not have a significant record of performance. The
details used in the New Hampshire Epping Bridge are essentially the
same as the Florida Edison Bridge, which has performed very well. It is
expected that all of these details will perform very well over time.

Several details included in this manual consist of exposed welded plate

connections. These connections should either be used in non-corrosive
environments, or made with stainless steel plates. The use of stainless
steel connection plates has become common in precast parking garage
structures.

Owners should consider how aggressive the environment will be where

these connections will be used and select the materials accordingly like
stainless steel, galvanized connections, or coated connections. After
welding, proper repair of corrosion protection is required. Galvanized or
coated elements will require future periodic maintenance.

Page 3-65 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.2.7 Estimated Construction Time for Connections
Exact timelines for construction are dependent on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and storage
areas. It is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction time
for the various systems discussed in this section.

Table 3.2.7-1 contains approximate installation times for the various

abutment systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time
Grouted 1 Day or This includes bracing and grouting.
Reinforcing Splice less
Coupler
Connections
Blockout closure 1-2 Days Two days are required for the
pour connections closure pour concrete (high early
strength) to attain at least enough
strength to allow for construction to
progress.
Post-Tensioning 3 Days This includes connecting the
Systems elements with epoxy, placement of
the post-tensioning strand or rod,
and grouting of the ducts.
Table 3.2.7-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Abutment
Connection Systems

3.2.8 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

To date, grouted connections and closure pour systems on precast
abutments have been very successful. Based on the performance of pier
systems using similar connections, it can be assumed that prefabricated
abutment connection will also be durable.

3.2.9 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Abutment Systems

The following pages contain data sheets for the various prefabricated
abutment systems. This information was primarily gathered from
agencies that have developed and used the systems. Most data in the
sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors added text when
an agency did not supply all requested information. The owner agencies
also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,

Page 3-66 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 3-67 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Page 3-68 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections
Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 3.2.1.1 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete abutment stem to Precast concrete footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-69 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to connect a precast concrete footing to abutment and wingwall wall stems. The key feature with the connection is the
embeded grouted splice sleeve connectors. Care needs to be taken with the casting of the footings and panels within tolerance (about 1/2") so that
the splice sleeves line up with the extended bars. This was not a problem during construction. The design of the connection was according to ACI
Manual on Emulation Design. The wall stem was placed in a pocket to facilitate grouting and provide shear resistance.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-70 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 3.2.1.2 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete backwall to Precast concrete abutment seat

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-71 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is similar to the NH wall stem to footing detail. The connection is made with grouted slice sleeves. Care needs to be taken with the
casting elements within tolerance (about 1/2") so that the splice sleeves line up with the extended bars. This was not a problem during construction.
The design of the connection was according to ACI Manual on Emulation Design. This connection is also used to transfer longitudinal seismic forces
from the superstructure to the substructure.

Precast Backwall

Grouted splicers embeded

in backwall

Reinforcing extending from

abutment stem

Precast Abutment Stem

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-72 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 3.2.1.3 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete abutment stem to Precast concrete cheekwall

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-73 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is similar to the NH wall stem to footing detail. The connection is made with grouted slice sleeves. Care needs to be taken with the
elements within tolerance (about 1/2") so that the splice sleeves line up with the extended bars. This was not a problem during construction. The
design of the connection was according to ACI Manual on Emulation Design. This connection is also used to transfer longitudinal seismic forces
from the superstructure to the substructure.

Precast Cheekwall

Grouted splicers embeded in

cheekwall

Reinforcing extending from

abutment stem

Precast Abutment Stem

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-74 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Iowa Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.2.3.1 A

Contact Name: Ahmad Abu-Hawash, Chief Structural Eng. Phone Number: (515-239-1393
Address: Office of Bridge and Structures E-mail: [email protected]
800 Lincoln Way
Ames, IA 50010 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast concrete integral abutment to Steel Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Boone County IBRC Project over Squaw Creek, Madison County IBRC Project

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-75 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

This connection connected steel HP 10x57 pile to the precast concrete abutment footing on an integral abutment bridge. The piles were driven to
design bearing in soil and two feet of pile were left above grade for embedment into the precast footing. The integral abutment utilized 5 feet of
prebore filled with bentonite. The precast concrete footing was cast with 21 inch diameter galvanized corrugated metal pipe that acted as wells for
the steel pile. Two 7/8 inch by 5 inch shear studs were welded to each side of the pile web to aid in connection. The footing was placed over the
pile and the voids (corrugated metal pipe) were filled with a special concrete mix designed for rapid cure.

Plan notes were needed to specify a final pile driving tolerance of 3 inches in any horizontal direction. Iowa Specifications are currently written with
a starting pile tolerance, but not an end tolerance. This tight tolerance was to insure that the piles would fit into the wells created by the corrugated
metal pipe. The precast abutment footing was leveled using steel channel sections welded to the steel pile. The void under the precast abutment
footing created by this method of construction was filled with flowable mortar. This connection enabled pile to be driven, abutment footing placed,
and flowable mortar placed in one day. The concrete in the footing voids were placed the next day.

This connection was also laboratory tested by Iowa State University as part of the evaluation of the IBRC project. The results of ISU's study will be
published at a future date.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? Yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-76 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.2.3.1 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast semi-integral abutment stem to steel piles

Name of Project where the detail was used Upton Maine Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-77 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the Maine DOT and adopted by the committee for bridges for integral abutment bridges. The pieces were match cast
with shear keys in the fabrication plant. The piles were standard steel H piles that were driven ahead of time through the roadway behind the
existing abutments. The precast wall segments were epoxy bonded in the field and post tensioned. The pockets for the piles were then filled with
self consolidating concrete from ports on the top face of the abutment. Installation took approximately 1 day.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-78 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.2.3.1 C

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Abutment Cap to Steel H-Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Battleground Creek

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-79 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Steel plates with shear studs are cast at the pile locations in the bottom of the abutment seat. In the field the steel H piles are driven and then cut
off level at the elevation of the bottom of the cap. The cap is set on the H piles and then the H piles are field welded to the bottom of the steel
plates. Following this procedure, fill is placed under the abutment seat and behind the abutment seat.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 2006 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 2+ Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 8 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 8 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-80 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Wyoming DOT Detail Number 3.2.3.1 D

Contact Name: Gregg Fredrick Phone Number: 307 777 4427

Address: 5300 Bishop Blvd E-mail: [email protected]
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast Concrete Abutment Seat to Driven Steel H Piling

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge over Middle Fork Crazy Woman Creek (Wyoming Drawing Number 6635)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-81 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Steel plates with shear studs are cast at the pile locations in the bottom of the abutment seat. In the field the steel H piles are driven and then cut
off level at the elevation of the bottom of the cap. The cap is set on the H piles and then the H piles are field welded to the bottom of the steel
plates. Following this procedure, fill is placed under the abutment seat and behind the abutment seat.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 4 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 6 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-82 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: MnDOT Bridge Office Detail Number 3.2.3.2 A

Contact Name: Joseph M. Fishbein, P.E. Phone Number: 651-747-2196

Address: 3485 Hadley Avenue N. E-mail: [email protected]
Oakdale, MN 55128
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Abutment to Round CIP piles

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge 13004, TH 8 over Center Lake Channel, Center City, MN

Connection Details: Manual Reference: Section 3.2.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-83 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Connection between precast abutment and round CIP piles. Abutment was precast with oversized holes for piles, and smaller holes between pile
blockouts and top of abutment were included for grouting. After piles were installed, abutment was placed over piles, leveled into position, and high-
strength grout injected from top of abutment through grout holes. Rebar inside the CIP piles projected into the abutment for additional bonding. The
main problem was the difficulty in handling the precast abutments, due to their weight (72 tons for the stage I segments) and non-symmetric shape.
For phase II of the project, conventional CIP abutments were used.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known) Good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? maybe (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 2 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-84 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.2.3.2 B

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Abutment Cap to Prestressed Concrete Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Tanglewood

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-85 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-86 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Texas Department of Transportation Detail Number 3.2.3.2 C

Contact Name: Lloyd M. Wolf, PE Phone Number: 512-416-2279

Address: Bridge Division E-mail: [email protected]
112 E. 11th Street
Austin, TX 78704 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Abutment Cap to Prestressed Concrete Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Dry Creek Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-87 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Note: The photos shown below were taken during construction. The photo on the left shows the pier cap being lowered onto the
prestressed concrete piles.

The photo on the right is the top of the cap during the grouting procedure for the reinforcing bars. The ducts run from the bottom to the top of the
cap. The ducts are standard post tensioning ducts.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion X
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-88 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.2.3.3 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast semi-integral abutment stem to Precast semi-integral abutment stem

Name of Project where the detail was used Upton Maine Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.3.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-89 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the Maine DOT and adopted by the committee for bridges for integral abutment bridges. The pieces were match cast
with shear keys in the fabrication plant. The precast components were epoxy bonded in the field and post tensioned. Installation took
approximately 1 day.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-90 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 3.2.4.1 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast flying wingwall to Precast semi-integral abutment stem

Name of Project where the detail was used Upton Maine Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-91 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the Maine DOT and adopted by the committee for bridges for integral abutment bridges. The pieces were match cast
with shear keys in the fabrication plant. The precast components were epoxy bonded in the field and post tensioned. Installation took
approximately 1 day.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression Tension Torsion x
What year was this detail first used? 2004 Condition at last inspection (if known) Excellent
How many times has this detail been used? 2 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-92 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Wyoming DOT Detail Number 3.2.4.1 B

Contact Name: Gregg Fredrick Phone Number: 307 777 4427

Address: 5300 Bishop Blvd E-mail: [email protected]
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Concrete Wingwall to Precast Concrete Abutment Seat

Name of Project where the detail was used Bridge over Middle Fork Crazy Woman Creek (Wyoming Drawing Number 6635)

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.4.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-93 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Editor's Note: The welded steel plates are somewhat exposed after constructionis complete. It is recommended that stainless steel plates and
welds be used for this connection.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 5 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 5 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 4 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 7 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-94 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 3.2.4.2 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast concrete abutment or backwall to Precast concrete approach slab

Name of Project where the detail was used Conceptual detail

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.2.4.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-95 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail is a conceptual detail that may be used on future accelerated bridge projects in New Hampshire. The approach slab will be doweled to
the abutment stem and set on the approach backfill.

A similar detail has been used by the Maine DOT on several projects.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 10 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-96 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.3 Wingwall and Retaining Wall Systems
Wingwalls and retaining walls are sometimes referred to as earth retaining
systems. There are many different types of systems for constructing earth
retaining walls. The most common types of walls include:

• Concrete Cantilever
• Concrete Gravity
• Mechanically Stabilized Earth
• Prefabricated Modular
• Anchored
• Cantilever Sheeting and Soldier Pile

The AASHTO LRFD Specifications [1] includes details about each one of these
walls. This section will include information on prefabrication of retaining wall
systems and how they can be used in accelerated construction projects.

Some of the systems shown in this section are proprietary; however in most
cases, there are multiple manufacturers that can produce similar walls. Some
states allow multiple wall systems for larger wall projects by bidding the walls as
a design-build product, where the manufacturer designs the wall based on the
constraints of the site.

3.3.1 Cantilever Walls

Conventional cantilever walls are normally comprised of a reinforced
concrete footing connected to a reinforced concrete stem. These wall
types are common for wingwalls on bridges that are relatively short in
both length and height.

3.3.1.1 Precast Wall Stem to Precast Footing Connection

The state of New Hampshire has developed a prefabricated version of
a conventional cantilever wall system by using emulation techniques
(see Section 1.4.2.1 for more information on emulation). The typical
construction joint between the wall stem and the footing is replaced by
a grouted reinforcing splice coupler connection. The New Hampshire
system also includes precast concrete footings (see Section 3.2.1.1
and Chapter 4 for more information on precast footings).

This system was used on a bridge in Epping, New Hampshire, where

the entire bridge was constructed in only eight days. The wingwall
construction took approximately one (1) day. The data sheet detail in
this section is for the Epping precast abutment stem to precast footing
connection, which also works for a precast cantilever wall to precast
footing connection.

3.3.1.2 Precast Wall Stem to Precast Wall Stem Connection

The AASHTO LRFD Specifications [1] require that retaining walls be
constructed with contraction joints spaced at a maximum of 30 feet
and expansion joints spaced at no more than 90 feet. The
specification goes on to require that the joints be filled with an
approved filler material to ensure the proper function of the joint.

Page 3-97 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 Contraction joints are used to allow the concrete to shrink during
curing and to contract with temperature changes. Contraction joints
differ from construction joints in that they do not have reinforcing
passing through the joint. Expansion joints are used to allow the
concrete to shrink and to allow thermal expansion of the wall.
Expansion joints also do not have reinforcing passing through them;
however the joint must be filled with a compressible material.

Some states detail the contraction joints with shear keys to provide
interaction with adjacent wall panels. Other states simply have a flat
joint without shear keys. The New Hampshire DOT details include
shear keys; therefore a grouted shear key configuration was used.
The grout was placed after the wall panels were set and connected to
the footings. The Epping Bridge did not require expansion joints due
to the length of the walls; however they have developed details for
longer walls where the expansion joints would be filled with expanded
foam to allow for thermal expansion. Information on this detail can be
found in the PCI Northeast document entitled “Guidelines for
Accelerated Bridge Construction Using Precast/Prestressed Concrete
Components” [44].

3.3.2 Modular Precast Wall Systems

Modular precast concrete wall systems are walls that are made up of
prefabricated elements that are joined in different ways to create a wall
system.

There are two distinct types of prefabricated wall systems that are
primarily in use today. There are other systems in use and more in
development. All of these wall systems include prefabricated elements;
therefore they are well suited for prefabricated bridge projects.

3.3.2.1 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Systems (MSE)

MSE systems use thin prefabricated wall panels that are connected to
earth anchoring devices. These devices engage the soil mass behind
the wall face to create a soil mass gravity wall. The construction of
these walls can progress rapidly because the system is built while the
soil is being placed behind the wall; thereby combining two processes
into one.

MSE walls are proprietary; however there are several manufacturers

that make this type of system. Most states have standard details or
approved wall products; therefore individual details from each state
are not presented in this manual. Figure 3.3.2.1-1 depicts a typical
wall section for a mechanically stabilized earth wall. Designers should
contact each state to determine which wall systems are allowed for
use.

Page 3-98 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 Figure 3.3.2.1-1 Typical MSE Wall Details

3.3.2.2 Modular Block Systems

Modular block retaining walls are a form of gravity retaining wall in
which the cast-in-place concrete is replaced by modular reinforced
concrete modules that interlock to form a wall system. The system
resists soil forces by the mass of the wall and sometimes by the mass
of soil placed within voids in the blocks.

As with MSE systems, modular block walls are normally proprietary.

Many states have approved product lists for these wall systems;
therefore individual details from each state are not presented in this
manual. Figure 3.3.2.2-1 depicts a typical wall section for a modular
block wall. Designers should contact each state to determine which
wall systems are allowed for use.

Figure 3.3.2.2-1 Modular Block Wall Example

(T-WALL®, Courtesy of the Neel Company)

Page 3-99 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 3.3.3 Tolerances
In cases where wingwalls are directly attached to the bridge structure the
same tolerances for the bridge should be followed for the wingwall.

Most retaining walls are constructed away from the roadway and
therefore do not need to be constructed to a tight tolerance. Each
individual wall manufacturer has developed wall construction tolerances
that should be followed during the installation. These tolerances ensure
the proper fit of the individual elements.

3.3.4 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of

Prefabricated Wall Systems
There is a long history of prefabricated wall systems in the United States.
The modular retaining wall systems that are constructed with high quality
precast concrete have performed very well. Most performance issues
with wall systems can be attributed to problems with either the supporting
soils or the backfill soils. The use of proper drainage systems for backfill
soils is also critical for the long term performance of any wall system.
Proper compaction of backfill soils also plays an important role in
performance.

3.3.5 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

Exact timelines for construction are dependent on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and storage
areas. It is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction time
for the various systems discussed in this section. Since retaining walls
and wingwalls can vary in size, the values given are for a typical bridge
wingwall that is approximately 50 feet long and approximately 15 feet tall.

Table 3.3.5-1 contains approximate installation times for the various wall
systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time
Precast Cantilever 3 Days This includes bracing, grouting and
Wall backfilling.
MSE Wall System 4-Days This includes a concrete leveling
pad, placement and backfilling.
Modular Block 4 Days This includes a concrete leveling
Systems pad, placement and backfilling.
Table 3.3.5-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Retaining Wall
Systems (approximately 50 feet long)

3.3.6 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

Many states use prefabricated wall systems. The construction of
retaining walls can be the critical path to an accelerated construction
project. With many highways being widened within limited right of way, it

Page 3-100 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 is common for designers to detail long retaining walls along the edge of
roadway where earth embankments exist. These walls can be over a
mile long and therefore represent the most significant structure on the
project.

Designers often detail only one wall system for a given site. An option
that could be considered is to allow multiple wall types at a given location
so contractors can choose the most efficient system for construction. In
this case the wall is bid as a lump sum item. Designers need to carefully
detail the limits of payment for a lump sum wall bid, which should include
the backfill soils. This is required because the backfill soils are an integral
portion of any wall system (see Section 3.2 for backfilling options).

3.3.7 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Wingwall and Retaining Wall
Systems
The following pages contain data sheets for various prefabricated
wingwall and retaining wall systems. This information was primarily
gathered from agencies that have developed and used the systems.
Some systems were obtained from manufacturers and industry groups.
Most data in the sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors
added text when an agency did not supply all requested information. The
owner agencies also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,
consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that

Page 3-101 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components connected
• Name of project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 3-102 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 3.3.1.1 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete wall stem to Precast concrete footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.3.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-103 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to connect a precast concrete footing to abutment and wingwall wall stems. The key feature with the connection is the
embeded grouted splice sleeve connectors. Care needs to be taken with the casting of the footings and panels within tolerance (about 1/2") so that
the splice sleeves line up with the extended bars. This was not a problem during construction. The design of the connection was according to ACI
Manual on Emulation Design. The wall stem was placed in a pocket to facilitate grouting and provide shear resistance.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-104 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 3.3.1.2 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete wall stem to Precast concrete wall stem

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 3.3.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 3-105 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to connect two adjacent wall stem section. New Hampshire typically keys wall stem joint; therefore a grouted key joint was
used. The contractor did have problems with the forming of the keyways. Foam backer rods were initially used, however the pressure head of the
grout overcame the strength of the rod and the form failed. Subsequent forms were strengthened and performed well.

Construction Photo

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 8 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 8 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 9 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 9 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 3-106 Chapter 3: Substructure Connections

 Chapter 4 – Foundation Connections
This chapter is devoted to connections in foundation systems. The chapter has been
broken out into typical foundation elements that are used on most bridges. The
AASHTO LRFD design specifications [1] define constructed foundations as spread
footings, driven piles and drilled shafts.

4.1: Footing and Pile Systems

Few states have designed and constructed prefabricated footings for bridges, while
most states use prefabricated piles. The New Hampshire DOT has had success
with prefabricated footings. The Northeast PCI Bridge Technical Committee has
adopted these details as a standard for the northeast region.

4.1.1 Precast Footing to Subgrade Connections

One of the primary difficulties with using precast concrete footings is the
ability to properly seat the footing on the subgrade. Inadequate seating
will result in rocking of the footings and settlement of the foundation.

In order to eliminate this problem, it is necessary to place a flowable

concrete or grout under the footing. The New Hampshire DOT has
developed a detail that includes leveling bolts that lift the footing above
the subgrade material and allows for the installation of flowable grout.
The flowable grout can either be a low grade concrete, or even flowable
fill. High strength material is not required for the fill because the material
is simply a filler, and the footing bearing pressures are normally in the
order of 50 psi.

For footings constructed on bedrock, it is recommended that a sub-footing

be poured to provide a relatively level area for setting the footings. When
a footing is placed on soil, the footings can be placed on steel plates
under the leveling bolts.

4.1.2 Precast Footing to Precast Footing Connections

Depending on the design of the footing, the connection between adjacent
footing elements may or may not need to be a structural connection.
Abutment and wall footings are primarily designed as one way slabs.
This means that discrete footing elements can be placed without a
significant connection. The New Hampshire DOT has developed a detail
where the footings are connected with a simple grouted shear key.

If a more substantial moment connection is desired, a small closure pour

is recommended. Reinforcing steel can be projected from each footing
elements with a simple lap splice between the bars. This closure pour is
easy to form and pour because the two footing elements and the
subgrade can be used for most of the formed area.

4.1.3 Precast Footing to Steel Pile Connection

Several states have developed details for connecting precast concrete
pier caps to steel pile when used as a pier bent (see Section 3.1.1.3).
Some of these details could be used for footing connections also. There

Page 4-1 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

 has also been steel pile connection details developed for integral
abutment bridges (see Section 3.2.3).

The Northeast PCI Bridge Technical Committee has developed

conceptual details for the connection of a spread footing to steel piles.
While these details are conceptual, they are based on details that are
similar to the pier cap connections.

The major issues with a pile to footing connection are whether or not
there is anticipated uplift on the piles or if there is a need to provide
moment capacity in the pile connection. Uplift capacity can be achieved
by welding reinforcing steel to the pile end and embedding the reinforcing
in a closure pour (note that weldable reinforcing steel will be required for
this connection). Moment capacity is achieved by embedding the pile top
at least 12 inches into the footing.

4.1.4 Precast Footing to Precast Concrete Piles

As with the steel pile connections described above, several states have
developed connection details for precast concrete piles connected to
precast concrete pier bents. There have also been concrete pile
connection details developed for integral abutment bridges (see Section
3.2.3).

The Florida DOT has developed a connection of a hollow precast

concrete pile to a precast footing. This connection consists of a large
blockout in the footing where a reinforcing steel cage can be installed
between the pile top and the blockout. This connection can develop the
full moment capacity of the pile. The Northeast PCI Bridge Technical
Committee has also developed conceptual details for the connection of a
spread footing to precast concrete piles.

4.1.5 Precast Footing to Cast-in-place Pile or Drilled Shaft Connections

To the knowledge of the authors, no state has developed a connection
detail for cast-in-place piles or drilled shafts connected to precast
concrete footings. The details discussed in Section 4.1.4 could easily be
adapted for use with cast-in-place concrete piles or drilled shafts.

4.1.6 Precast Pile to Precast Pile Connection

Most precast concrete driven piles are square, round, or octagonal solid
piles. Many states used this pile and have standard details for connecting
piles that need to be spliced. The precast concrete pile industry has
developed standard pile splicing details. The PCI manual entitled
“Precast Prestressed Concrete Piles (BM-20-04)”[50] is recommended for
more information on this subject.

The Florida DOT has developed a detail for splicing hollow square
prestressed concrete piles. This detail consists of a reinforced concrete
closure pour between pile elements.

Page 4-2 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

 4.1.7 Precast Pier Box Cofferdams
One of the most difficult processes for construction of piers over water
involves the construction of the pier footings on piles. This can involve
complicated sheeting systems and cofferdams. The advent of larger
diameter drilled shaft technology has brought about new methods for
supporting bridge structures over water. With large diameter drilled
shafts, it is possible to support large bridges with a few or even one drilled
shaft per pier column.

Several projects have been designed where a precast concrete pier box
was used to dewater the area where the drilled shaft connects to the
bridge footing. For example, the new Providence River Bridge in
Providence, Rhode Island, has precast concrete pier boxes that were
hung from the 8 foot diameter drilled shafts that allowed the construction
of the footings in the dry. The precast box was set over the drilled shaft
and sealed with a small tremie pour around the drilled shaft. These
systems can eliminate the need for complicated deep cofferdams and
dewatering systems, especially in deep water. When built using HPC, the
precast box forms can serve as an additional corrosion protection system
for the new pier footing.

Figure 4.1.7-1 Providence River Bridge Pier Box

Page 4-3 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

 Figure 4.1.7-2 Providence River Bridge Pier Box
Preparation for Footing Reinforcing Placement

Figures 4.1.7-1 and 2 show the construction of the Providence River

Bridge. The use of the precast concrete pier boxes saved the contractor
significant time in the construction of the foundations.

4.1.8 Grade Control and Tolerances

The grade and alignment of prefabricated foundation elements should be
controlled as much as possible, since it may be difficult to make
significant adjustments in other parts of the structure.

The placement of precast footing elements can be adjusted by shims

during placement. The New Hampshire DOT installed leveling bolts in
the footings that allow precise adjustment of the footing during
installation. This system worked well, although there was some difficulty
in turning the leveling bolts. This was attributed to corrosion of the bolt
threads. They corrected this by greasing the bolts and by adjusting the
bolts prior to full release of the footing from the crane.

4.1.9 Evaluation of Performance and Long Term Durability of

Prefabricated Footing and Pile Systems
To date, very few prefabricated footing systems have been constructed.
The oldest installation is on the Escambia Bay Bridge in Florida. This
footing is in a severe corrosion environment and is still in good condition.

Based on the performance of other precast foundation systems (piers,

abutments) which have similar details, it is likely that the precast footing
systems will be very durable.

4.1.10 Estimated Construction Time for Connections

Exact timelines for construction are dependent on a number of factors
including site access, traffic control, weather, crane locations and storage

Page 4-4 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

 areas. It is possible to make reasonable estimates on construction time
for the various systems discussed in this section.

Table 4.1.10-1 contains approximate installation times for the various

foundation connection systems included in this section:

System Minimum Comments

Installation
Time
Precast footing to 1-2 Days This includes installation leveling
subgrade and grouting.
Precast footing to 1-2 Days One day for a grouted shear key, 2
precast footing days for a concrete closure pour.
Precast footings to 1-3 Days This includes placement and
various piles grouting.
Precast Pile to 1 day
Precast Pile
Precast concrete 1-4 weeks This includes the installation of the
pier boxes box and dewatering (not footing
placement). This depends greatly
on the size of the pier and the
complexity of the footing.
Table 4.1.10-1 Approximate Minimum Installation Times for Foundation
Connection Systems

4.1.11 Recommendations for Improvements to Current Practices

Prefabricated footings have not been used by many states. This is
probably because of concerns about obtaining a proper connection to the
subgrade materials. The work completed by several states should be
expanded to more projects so that a more substantial knowledge base
will be developed.

4.1.12 Connection Detail Data Sheets for Footing and Pile Systems
The following pages contain data sheets for the various prefabricated
foundation systems. This information was primarily gathered from
agencies that have developed and used the systems. Most data in the
sheets were provided by the owner agency; the authors added text when
an agency did not supply all requested information. The owner agencies
also provide a comparative classification rating.

Each connection detail data sheet is presented in a two-page format.

Users of this Manual can simply remove and copy a data sheet for use in
developing a system for a particular project. These sheets are meant to
give users a basic understanding of each connection that can be used
during the type study phase of a project. The data sheets are not meant
to be comprehensive, but do convey the component make-up of the
detail, how it is meant to function, and provide some background on its
field application. Users will need to investigate each connection further,

Page 4-5 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

 consider site-specific conditions, and apply sound engineering judgment
during design.

The key information provided for each connection is as follows:

• Name of the organization that supplied the detail
• Contact person at the organization
• Detail Classification Level
Level 1
This is the highest classification level that is generally
assigned to connections that have either been used on
multiple projects or have become standard practice by at
least one owner agency. It typically represents details that
are practical to build and will perform adequately.
Level 2
This classification is for details that have been used only
once and were found to be practical to build and have
performed adequately.
Level 3
This classification is for details that are either experimental
or conceptual. Details are included in this Manual that
have been researched in laboratories, but to the
knowledge of the authors, have not been put into practical
use on a bridge. Also included in this classification are
conceptual details that have not been studied in the
laboratory, but are thought to be practical and useful.
• Components Connected
• Name of Project where the detail was used
• Manual Reference Section
The section(s) of this Manual applicable to the particular
detail shown.
• Connection Details
• Description, comments, specifications and special design
procedures
• Forces that the connection is designed to transmit
• Information on the use of the connection (including inspection
ratings)
• A performance evaluation of the connection rated by the
submitting agency

Page 4-6 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 4.1.1 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 1

Components Connected Precast concrete footing to Subgrade

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.1 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-7 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to place a precast footing on the native subgrade. A lean concrete sub-footing was used to provide a level work area over
blasted bedrock. In addition, details have been developed for placement over compacted gravel. The key feature is that concrete grout is placed
between the footing and subgrade to provide even bearing. Leveling bolts are also incorporated so that the grade of the footing can be adjusted
easily. This was found to be an easy adjustment as long as the bolts were lubricated and the leveling took place before the crane released the
piece.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear Moment Compression x Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-8 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: NHDOT - Bureau of Bridge Design Detail Number 4.1.2 A

Contact Name: David L. Scott, P.E. Phone Number: (603) 271-2731

Address: PO Box 483 E-mail: [email protected]
7 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0483 Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast concrete footing to Precast concrete footing

Name of Project where the detail was used Epping, New Hampshire

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.2 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-9 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was used to connect two adjacent footing components. The footing reinforcing was designed with one way action and only distribution
reinforcing in the other direction. This allowed for a simple grouted shear connection. The joints in the footing were offset from the wall stem joint.
The shear keys were grouted at the same time as the under footing grouting procedure. The photo shows the footing being installed. A concrete
sub-footing was used due to the presence of fractured bedrock on the site. This detail can also be used on compacted fill.

Editor's Notes
The submitting agency did not submit the data shown below. The authors have inserted the data based on a review of the details.

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment Compression Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 10 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 9 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 10 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-10 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 4.1.3 A

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast spread footing to Steel Pile with uplift

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.3 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-11 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges as a conceptual detail. This has not yet been built; however similar configurations have
been built in other states. Leveling bolts are used in the corners to set grade, and a small aggregate concrete is poured through ports to fill the voids
around the piles. The reinforcing around the piles is to control shrinkage of the poured concrete and can be placed prior to setting the footing. The
design of the footing is the same as a conventional cast-in-place concrete footing design. A corrugated steel duct pocket could be substituted for the
tapered pocket.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion
What year was this detail first used? NA Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 0 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-12 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Florida DOT Detail Number 4.1.4 A

Contact Name: Thomas Andres Phone Number: 850-414-4269

Address: 605 Suwannee Street, MS 33 E-mail: [email protected]
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected P/S concrete square pile to Pile Footing

Name of Project where the detail was used I-10 Escambia Bay Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-13 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Fit-up issue: pile placement tolerance is important. In order to fit prefabricated pile footing, only 3" lateral tolerance is allowed for each pile.

Design Issue: Evaluate the effect of eccentricity load from column due to pile placement tolerance; consider lateral confining pressure of confined
hole; and connection rebar development length for confined concrete.

Durability issues: Shrinkage cracks at pile footing/pile interface especially at top surface of pile footing. Corrosion concern due to shrinkage cracks.
Precast element has a tendency to pull water from fresh concrete placement.

Shape of the underside of the grout cavity is important to prevent hollow areas. The contractor was required to do a test pour to ensure proper
concrete placement. This process is recommended for all complex void filling operations.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known) good
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection 2006
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 5 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 5 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 5 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-14 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 4.1.4 B

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast spread footing to Precast concrete piles

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-15 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges as a conceptual detail. This has not yet been built; however similar configurations have
been built in other states. Leveling bolts are used in the corners to set grade, and a small aggregate concrete is poured through ports to fill the voids
around the piles. The reinforcing around the piles is to control shrinkage of the poured concrete and can be placed prior to setting the footing. The
design of the footing is the same as a conventional cast-in-place concrete footing design.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? NA Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 9 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 0 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-16 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: PCI Northeast Bridge Tech Committee Detail Number 4.1.4 C

Contact Name: Rita Seraderian Phone Number: 888-700-5670

Address: 116 Radcliffe Road E-mail: contact @pcine.org
Belmont, MA 02478
Detail Classification Level 3

Components Connected Precast spread footing to Precast Concrete Pile with uplift

Name of Project where the detail was used Never used: CONCEPTUAL

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.4 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-17 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
This detail was developed by the committee for bridges as a conceptual detail. This has not yet been built; however similar configurations have
been built in other states. Leveling bolts are used in the corners to set grade, and a small aggregate concrete is poured through ports to fill the voids
around the piles. The reinforcing around the piles is to control shrinkage of the poured concrete and can be placed prior to setting the footing. The
design of the footing is the same as a conventional cast-in-place concrete footing design. A corrugated steel duct pocket could be substituted for the
tapered pocket.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension X Torsion
What year was this detail first used? NA Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 0 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 6 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 7 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 9 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 0 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-18 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Florida DOT Detail Number 4.1.6 A

Contact Name: Thomas Andres Phone Number: 850-414-4269

Address: 605 Suwannee Street, MS 33 E-mail: [email protected]
Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Hollow P/S concrete square pile to Hollow P/S concrete square pile

Name of Project where the detail was used I-10 Escambia Bay Bridge

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.6 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-19 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
See discussion on pile to pier cap detail.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear X Moment X Compression X Tension Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2002 Condition at last inspection (if known)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 9 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 8 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 10 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 6 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 6 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 6 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-20 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements Federal Highway Administration
Organization: Arora & Associates, P.C. Detail Number 4.1.7 A

Contact Name: Alan Haring, P.E. Phone Number: (609)219-6785

Address: 3120 Princeton Pike E-mail: [email protected]
Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
Detail Classification Level 2

Components Connected Precast Pier Box Cofferdam to Steel Pipe Pile

Name of Project where the detail was used Route 70 over Manasquan River, Brielle, NJ

Connection Details: Manual Reference Section 4.1.7 See Reverse side for more information on this connection

Page 4-21 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

Description, comments, specifications, and special design procedures See Reverse side for more information on this connection
Temporary support systems for supporting segmental precast cofferdam sections used as a pile-driving frame and as formwork of the cast-in-place
footing. Stage 1 shows a plan of the first framing system used to lift the precast cofferdam sections. The system is supported on the outside rows
of piles temporarily. After driving the remaining piles through the openings in the bottom of the cofferdam, the Stage 2 support system is installed
above the top of the cutoff piles and the first framing system is removed. The annulus between the piles and the cofferdam openings are sealed
with grout and a tremie seal is installed. The footing concrete can now be placed in the dry.

Editor's Notes

What forces are the connection designed to transmit? (place x in appropriate boxes)
Shear x Moment x Compression x Tension x Torsion
What year was this detail first used? 2005 Condition at last inspection (if known)(new construction)
How many times has this detail been used? 1 Year of last inspection N/A
Would you use it again? yes (yes/no/maybe)
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the performance of this connection in the following categories?
Speed of Construction 7 (0 very slow, 10 very fast) When compared to conventional construction
Constructability 7 (0 difficulty making connection, 10 went together easily)
Cost 3 (0 expensive, 10 cost effective) When compared to other connection methods
Durability 5 (0 not durable, 10 very durable)
Inspection Access 0 (0 not visible, 10 easily inspected)
Future Maintenance 10 (0 will need maintenance, 10 no maintenance anticipated)

Page 4-22 Chapter 4: Foundation Connections

 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

Example Title Page

1 Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs A-3

2 Precast Column Connections: A-9

Column to Cap Connection using mild reinforcement embedded
in grouted post-tensioning duct

3 Precast Column Connections: A-11

Precast Column Connections using Grouted Reinforcing Splice
Couplers

Page App A-1 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

Page App A-2 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples
 Example 1
Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs

The design of full depth precast concrete deck slabs is similar to the design of a cast-in-
place concrete deck with a few exceptions. The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications [1] contain provisions for precast full depth deck slabs. Portions of those
provisions will be covered in this example.

This example will be for a full depth precast concrete deck slab placed on girders that
run parallel to the span. The connections that will be highlighted include the transverse
connection between adjacent deck panels and the connection between the slab and the
beam. There will also be discussion regarding the design of the actual deck.

Design of Main Reinforcing in the Deck

The design of the main deck reinforcing can be based on the standard design provisions
for cast-in-place concrete decks as outlined in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications [1]. The one exception to this is that the empirical design method as
specified in Article 9.7.2 is not applicable to precast decks.

The reinforcing in the deck can be mild reinforcing, prestressing (pretensioned or post-
tensioned), or a combinations of each. The AASHTO specifications cover the design of
all of these approaches; therefore a detailed design example is not presented here.

The design of the overhang requires special attention. The maximum moment in the
overhang deck can be at the base of the bridge parapet or railing post. This location is
often very close to the end of the deck slab. It may not be possible to design this
connection using prestressing strand since the moment is normally applied within the
development length of the strand and sometimes within the transfer length of the strand.
In this case, the overhang slab will need to be supplemented with mild reinforcement.

Design of the connection to the steel beams

The design of this connection is critical to the performance of the superstructure if the
design of the girders is based on composite action. Standard shear connectors can be
used that are placed in pockets that are cast in the precast deck slab. The pocket shape
is normally rectangular with either square or rounded corners. The sides of the pockets
can be vertical; however it is recommended that the pockets be tapered from top to
bottom for several reasons. It is easier to remove a tapered pocket form in the deck
after casting, and a tapered pocket will develop a mechanical connection to the beam.

The design of the shear connectors is according to the AASHTO specifications. Instead
of varying the spacing of the connectors across the beam, the spacing is kept constant
and the number of connectors in each pocket is varied as the shear demand changes.

Design of the connection to concrete beams

The design of this connection is similar to the steel beam connection above. The
AASHTO provisions for horizontal shear design can be followed. If projecting reinforcing
is used, the bars need to be spaced in cadence with the proposed slab pocket spacing.
Research has shown that embedded headed studs can also be used for this connection
[22]. Other research has shown that this connection can be made using embedded steel

Page App A-3 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

 plates cast into the precast beams [33]. These plates are attached to the beam using
shear studs. In the field, the deck is connected in a similar manner as a steel beam.

Transverse Connection with Post-tensioning (PT)

The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications [1] contain several provisions that
cover the design of post-tensioning systems. This example will cover the sections that
are applicable to the design of a post-tensioning for the connection between full depth
precast concrete deck slabs.

Givens:
• 200 foot long single span bridge
• Deck information
o 8 inches thick
o 50 feet wide
o f’c = 4000 psi
• PT duct information
o Use 1”x3” Oval polyethylene duct placed flat (inside dimensions)
o Use a maximum of 4-0.5” diameter grade 270 strand for PT
ƒ fpu = 270 ksi
ƒ fpy = 0.9 * fpu = 243 ksi

1. Article 9.7.5.3 Longitudinally Post-Tensioned Precast Decks

a. The average effective prestress shall not be less than 0.25 ksi.
i. This will be the basis of this design example. The prestress is
placed at mid-depth of the slab to provide uniform pre-
compression across a grouted shear key joint.
ii. Article 9.7.5.3 specifies a minimum average effective prestress of
0.250 ksi. Most designers assume this prestress is taken at
release and do not account for long term losses due to creep,
shrinkage and elastic shortening of the strand. The interaction of
the composite prestressed deck with the supporting framing is a
very complex situation. Some prestress will be lost due to these
effects; however the beam framing will resist these losses. There
is not a recognized method for calculating these losses in a
composite deck. Most designers assume that 0.250 ksi prestress
is conservative enough to cover any minor loss of prestress. For
this example, it will be assumed that the effective prestress is
taken at release. Losses will be calculated for friction between the
duct and the PT strand, anchorage set, and elastic shortening.

2. Article 5.4.6.2 Size of Ducts

a. For multiple strand tendons: Required Area > 2.5 * As

As = Net area of prestressing steel = 4 * 0.153 = 0.612 in2
Duct Area = 2.79 in2 (from manufacturer)

Therefore: 2.79 in2 > 0.612 in2 ok

b. Inside diameter > d + 0.25 in.

Page App A-4 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

 d = strand diameter = 0.5 in.

Therefore: 1” > 0.5 + 0.25 = 0.75 ok

c. Duct size < 0.4 * least gross concrete thickness

Therefore: 1” < 0.4 * 8” = 3.2” ok

3. Article 5.9.3 Stress limitations for prestressing tendons

Prior to seating = 0.9fpy = 219 ksi

At anchorages immediately after anchor set = 0.7fpu = 189 ksi

4. Article 5.9.5.1 Total Loss of Prestress

a. For post-tensioned members:

ΔfpT = ΔfpF + ΔfpA + ΔfpES + ΔfpLT

ΔfpT = total loss (ksi)

ΔfpF = Loss due to friction (ksi)
ΔfpA = Loss due to anchorage set (ksi)
ΔfpES = sum of all losses due to elastic shortening (ksi)
ΔfpLT = losses due to long-term shrinkage and creep of concrete
and relaxation of the steel (ksi)

i. Loss due to anchorage set

Elongation = Δ = PL/AEp
In terms of stress = σ = fpA = P/A = ΔEp/L

Δ = anchorage set dimension = 0.375 (C5.9.5.2.1)

L = 200 feet = 2400 inches
Ep = Modulus of elasticity of strand = 28500 ksi (5.4.4.2)

fpA = 0.375 * 28500 / 2400 = 4.45 ksi

ii. Loss Due to friction

ΔfpF = fpj (1-e-(Kx + μα))

fpj = stress in prestressing steel at jacking (ksi)

Controlling stress after anchor set = 189 ksi
(see above)
Anchorage set stress = fpA = 4.5 ksi (see above)

Therefore: fpj = fpj + fpA = 189 + 4.5 = 193.5

x = length of prestressing tendon from jacking end to any

point under consideration (ft)

Page App A-5 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

 Assume that jacking will be done from one end;
therefore the point under consideration will be the
far end of the slab
Therefore: x = 200 ft

K = wobble coefficient (per foot of tendon)

= 0.0002 (Table 5.9.5.2.2b-1)

μ = coefficient of friction
= 0.23 (Table 5.9.5.2.2b-1)

α = sum of angular change of prestressing steel path

= 0 (straight bridge)

e = base of Napierian logarithms = 2.718

Therefore: ΔfpF = 193.5 (1-e-(0.0002*200 + 0.23*0)) = 7.59 ksi

iii. Article 5.9.5.2.3 Elastic shortening

There are two portions of this section. One for pretensioned
members and one for post-tensioned members. The equations
are as follows:

Pretensioned members
ΔfpES = (Ep /Ect)* fcgp

Post-tensioned members
ΔfpES = ((N-1)/2N) * (Ep /Ect)* fcgp

The equations are very similar. The PT equation has an

additional multiplier term (N-1)/2N. This term will always be less
than 1. The notes also state that this value can be multiplied by
0.25 for slab systems. A precast deck system is more similar to a
pretensioned beam since the prestressing is concentric and
uniform. For this reason, it is recommended that the equation for
pretensioned members be used. This is significantly more
conservative than equation for PT members.

ΔfpES =(Ep /Ect)* fcgp

Ep = modulus of elasticity of prestressing steel (ksi)

= 28500 ksi (5.4.4.2)

Ect = modulus of elasticity of concrete at transfer (ksi)

= 33,000K1wc1.5√fc’ (5.4.2.4-1)

K1 = correction factor for aggregate

= 1.0 (5.4.2.4)
wc = unit weight of concrete (kcf)
= 0.145 (Table 3.5.1-1)
fc’ = 4.0 ksi (given)

Page App A-6 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

 Therefore Ect = 3644 ksi

fcgp = the concrete stress at release (ksi)

= 0.250 ksi (9.7.5.3)

Therefore ΔfpES = 1.96 ksi

Therefore the total losses = ΔfpT = ΔfpF + ΔfpA + ΔfpES + ΔfpLT

= 7.59 + 4.45 + 1.96 + 0

= 14.0 ksi

5. Required number of Post-tensioning Ducts

a. Area of bridge deck
Width = 50 feet = 600 in. (given)
Thickness of deck = 8 in. (given)

Therefore deck area = 4800 in2

b. Required Prestress force

Effective Prestress = fcgp = 0.250 ksi (see Step 1 above)

Therefore the required prestress force = 0.250 * 4800 = 1200 kips

c. Number of PT strand required

Prestress after anchorage set = 189 ksi (see Step 3 above)
Anchorage set = 4.45 ksi

Therefore stress prior to anchorage set = 189 + 4.45 = 193.45 ksi

Prestress after losses = Effective prestress

= 193.45 – 14.0 = 179.45 ksi

Area of strand req. = Asreq

= Req. Prestress force / Prestress after losses
= 1200 / 179.45
= 6.69 in2

Area of strand per duct = 0.612 in2

Number of Ducts required = 6.69 / 0.612 = 10.9

Therefore use 11 Ducts with 4 – ½ in. diameter grade 270 strand

Page App A-7 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

Page App A-8 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples
 Example 2
Precast Column Connections

Column to Cap Connection using mild reinforcement embedded

in grouted post-tensioning duct
Post-tensioning ducts embedded in precast concrete components offer a means to
connect two concrete elements. There are proprietary connectors that are available for
this connection (see next section). There is one proprietary option that can be used for
several types of connections.

This connection was developed through

research undertaken by the Texas
Department of Transportation and put into
practice on the Lake Belton Bridge (see
photo to the left).

Design of the connection and connected

components
The design of this connection is currently
not covered in the AASHTO LRFD Bridge
Design Specifications [1]. The Texas
Research project included the development
of a design methodology for this connection.
The research report for this work is as
follows: Figure EX2-1 Lake Belton Bridge Pier

Development of a Precast Bent Cap System [49]

Authors: E.E. Matsumoto, M.C. Waggoner, M.E. Kreger, S.L. Wood and
J.E. Breen
The University of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation Research
Published: January 2001
Design Methodology: Pages 251-309

This methodology is well developed and is quite lengthy. In order to keep the size of this
manual reasonable, it was decided to not include this detailed design methodology in
this appendix. The full research document and design methodology is available at the
following website:
http://www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_1748_2.pdf

Seismic Issues
At this time, this connection does not meet the requirements for high seismic
applications. Future research may lead to a similar connection that can be used in high
seismic areas.

Page App A-9 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

Page App A-10 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples
 Example 3
Precast Column Connections

Precast Column Connections using Grouted Reinforcing Splice

Couplers
Several states have designed and built
bridges using grouted reinforcing splice
couplers. These couplers are mechanical
couplers that take the place of a reinforcing
lap splice. There is no requirement for the
design of the coupler. They are an off-the-
shelf item that is normally handled through a
performance specification. They are
particularly suited for prefabrication because
the connector is embedded in the precast
concrete component. The connection is
made by injecting grout into the cast steel
connector.
Figure EX3-1 Grouted Reinforcing
Splice Coupler

These couplers have been in the building

market for many years; however, they are
relatively new to the bridge market. One of
the first agencies to use these couplers on a
bridge project was the Florida Department of
Transportation. The Edison Bridge was built
using couplers for the column to footing
connection and the column to cap connection.
The detail above and the photo to the left are
Figure EX3-2 Edison Bridge
from the Edison Bridge Project.

Design of the Grouted Splice Coupler

The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications require that all mechanical reinforcing
splices develop 125% of the specified yield strength of the bar (Article 5.11.5.2.2) [1].
Several manufacturers make grouted splice couplers that can meet and exceed this
requirement.

Design of the Connecting Components

The design of the components is the same as the design of a standard reinforced
concrete component with one minor change. The couplers are larger than the
connecting bars; therefore in order to obtain proper cover over the coupler, the
reinforcing cage needs to be moved toward the interior of the component. This may
have an effect on the design of the component since the effective structural depth of the
member is reduced when compared to cast-in-place concrete construction. The
resulting change will be larger or more closely spaced bars.

Seismic Issues

Page App A-11 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

 At this time, this connection has been approved for use on seismic connection designed
for Seismic Zones 1 and 2. There is concern that this connection will meet the stringent
demands of ductile plastic hinging. Research has been completed in Japan in the past
that investigated plastic hinging capabilities of these connections [7]. The following two
plots show the results of this limited research. The upper plot is a plot of a control
sample column connection built without couplers. The lower plot is a plot of a column
connection built with couplers.

Figure EX3-3 Grouted Reinforcing Splice Coupler Test Results

Page App A-12 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

 A review of these two plots indicate that the column with the couplers behave essentially
the same as the control column and the plastic deformations are well above what is
normally required for ductile column behavior. There is concern that this research was
not broad enough for acceptance in the US bridge market. Future research may be
undertaken to confirm the behavior of these couplers on bridge.

Page App A-13 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples

Page App A-14 Appendix A: Connection Design Examples
 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

The following is a listing of proprietary products and systems that can be used for
prefabricated bridges. The list is based on the information contained in this document.
There are other products and systems available in the United States. Designers should
keep apprised of systems that may be available.

Description Page

Prefabricated Superstructure Systems B-3

Inverset
Effideck™
CON/SPAN® Bridge Systems
BEBO® Concrete Arch System
HY-SPAN® Bridge System
Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers B-5
NMB Splice Sleeve
Dayton Superior DB Grout Sleeve
Erico Lenton Interlok Rebar Splicing System
Proprietary Retaining Wall Systems B-6
Reinforced Earth® and Retained Earth™ Retaining Walls
Doublewal Retaining Wall
T-WALL® Retaining Wall System
Post-tensioning Systems B-7
Dydiwag Systems
VSL Post-tensioning Systems
Williams Threadbar Systems

Page App B-1 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

Page App B-2 Appendix B: Proprietary Products
 Prefabricated Superstructure Systems
1. Inverset
A precast concrete steel composite superstructure unit that is fabricated in the
inverted (up side down) position. When flipped right side up, the deck is pre-
compressed by the weight of the unit. The units are placed on the substructure
and narrow reinforced longitudinal closure pours complete the superstructure.
The additional compression due to the inverted casting increases the quality and
durability of the deck. The system was at one time patented. It is the
understanding of the authors that patent has run out; therefore it can be
manufactured by any precast fabricators.

Contact Information:
The Fort Miller Co, Inc.
P.O. Box 98
Schuylerville, NY 12871
Phone: (518) 695-5000
www.fortmiller.com

2. Effideck™
Effideck™ is a lightweight, precast concrete bolt down deck replacement
system. The system consists of a lightweight concrete deck slab and closely
spaced structural steel members cast integrally.

Contact Information:
The Fort Miller Co, Inc.
P.O. Box 98
Schuylerville, NY 12871
Phone: (518) 695-5000
www.fortmiller.com

3. CON/SPAN® Bridge Systems

CON/SPAN® is a patented modular precast concrete system for the construction
of bridges, culverts, underground structures and environmentally acceptable
alternatives for underground containment. The structures are arch type spans
with spandrel walls. Precast wingwalls are also included in this system.

Contact Information:
CON/SPAN®
3100 Research Blvd.
P.O. Box 20266
Dayton, Ohio 45420-0266
Phone: 937-254-2233
www.con-span.com

4. BEBO® Concrete Arch System

The BEBO® Concrete Arch System is a combination of cast-in-place concrete
footings, precast arch elements, headwalls, and wingwalls. The arch segments
can be supplied in one or two piece configurations.

Contact Information:
CONTECH Construction Products Inc.

Page App B-3 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

 9025 Centre Pointe Dr.
Suite 400
West Chester, OH 45069
Phone: 800-338-1122
www.contech-cpi.com

5. HY-SPAN® Bridge System

The HY-SPAN® Bridge System is a precast concrete rigid frame system with a
flat top. It can span from six to forty feet.

Contact Information:
HY-SPAN® Systems, Inc.
2050 South Harding
Indianapolis, Indiana 46221
Phone: 800-875-4920
www.hyspan.com

Page App B-4 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

 Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers
1. NMB Splice Sleeve
The NMB Splice Sleeve is a mechanical coupler for splicing reinforcing bars
which uses a cylindrical shaped casting filled with a Portland cement based non-
shrink high early strength grout. Reinforcing bars being spliced are inserted into
the sleeve to meet approximately at the center of the sleeve. This allows for the
structural connection of precast sections that will develop connections beyond
the tensile strength of the bar.

Contact Information:
Splice Sleeve North America, Inc.
192 Technology Drive, Suite J,
Irvine, California 92618-2409
Phone: (949)861-8393
www.splicesleeve.com

2. Dayton Superior DB Grout Sleeve

The Dayton Superior DB Grout Sleeve provides a two-piece splicing technique
for splicing rebar. Typical applications include splicing rebar in precast concrete
construction and cast-in-place concrete structures. The DB Grout Sleeve is a
steel casting filled with special non-shrink grout that splices reinforcing after
elements are erected.

Contact Information:
Dayton Superior
Corporate Headquarters
7777 Washington Village Dr., Ste. 130
Dayton, OH 45459
Phone: 937-428-6360
www.daytonsuperior.com

3. Erico Lenton Interlok

The Erico Lenton Interlok rebar splicing system is a coupler using for connecting
precast elements using the patented Lenton tapered thread system along with a
specially formulated cementitious grout placed in a steel casting sleeve.

Contact Information:
ERICO United States
34600 Solon Road
Solon, Ohio 44139
Phone: 440-248-0100
www.erico.com

Page App B-5 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

 Proprietary Retaining Wall Systems
There are numerous prefabricated retaining wall companies in the United States. Most
agencies have approved product lists for proprietary retaining walls. Designers are
encouraged to contact the local agencies for walls that are approved for use.

1. Reinforced Earth
Reinforced Earth® and Retained Earth™ Retaining Walls are mechanically
stabilized earth (MSE) gravity structures consisting of alternating layers of
granular backfill and reinforcing strips with a modular precast concrete facing.

Contact Information:
The Reinforced Earth Company
8614 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 1100
Vienna, VA 22182-2233
Phone: 1-800-446-5700
www.reinforcedearth.com

2. Doublewal
Doublewal is an interlocking precast retaining wall system. Each Doublewal unit
consist of two concrete panels connected by cross beams to form a soil bin. The
units are keyed together and filled with granular materials.

Contact Information:
Doublewal Corporation
7 West Main Street Plainville, CT 06062
Phone: 860-793-0295
www.doublewal.com

3. T-Wall
The T-WALL® Retaining Wall System is a precast reinforced concrete modular
wall system. The precast unit is comprised of a rectangular face panel and a
stem that extends into the backfill. The units are fabricated with a stem length
designed to suit the application. The units are then stacked and backfilled to suit
site conditions.

Contact Information:
The Neel Company
8328-D Traford Lane
Springfield, VA 22152
Phone: 703-913-7858
[email protected]

Page App B-6 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

 Post-tensioning Systems
1. Dywidag Systems
Dydiwag Systems supplies both multi-strand and threaded bar post-tensioning
systems.

Contact Information:
DYWIDAG Systems International USA, Inc.
320 Marmon Drive
Bolingbrook, IL 60440
Phone: 630-739-1100
www.dsiamerica.com

2. VSL Post-tensioning Systems

VSL supplies all types of multi-strand post-tensioning systems.

Contact Information:
VSL Corporate Headquarters
7455 New Ridge Road, Suite T
Hanover, MD 21076
Phone: 410-850-7000
www.vsl.net

3. Williams Threadbar
Williams supplies threaded bar post-tensioning systems.

Contact Information:
Williams Form Engineering Corp.
8165 Graphic Drive
Belmont, MI 49306
Phone: 616-866-1890
www.williamsform.com

Page App B-7 Appendix B: Proprietary Products

Page App B-8 Appendix B: Proprietary Products
 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
The following is a listing of sample specifications from several state agencies. These
specifications are written in the format of the particular agency; therefore the formats are
not similar. These specifications are presented for reference only. Designers can use
the information contained in this appendix; however the specifications should be
carefully reviewed and modified as needed.

Example Title Page

1 New Hampshire DOT – Prefabricated Substructures C-3

2 New Hampshire DOT - Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs C-11

3 Maine DOT – Prefabricated Integral abutments and piers C-27

3 Texas DOT Precast Column Connections: C-41

Column to Cap Connection using mild reinforcement embedded
in grouted post-tensioning duct

Page App C-1 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

Page App C-2 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 Example 1: New Hampshire DOT
Prefabricated Substructures
The following specification was taken from a project that involved the reconstruction of a
portion of Interstate 93. In this project, the design was based on conventional cast-in-
place concrete construction for the substructure elements. Typical details for
prefabricated substructure elements were also included in the contract. Contractors
were given the option to use either conventional construction or prefabricated
construction. Two specifications are included. One supplements the standards concrete
specification, and the other supplements the standard prestressed concrete
specifications.

SALEM TO MANCHESTER
13933C

June 6, 2007
SPECIAL PROVISION

AMENDMENT TO SECTION 520 -- PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE

Item 520.01027 - Concrete Class AA (QC/QA) (Precast Option) (F)

Item 520.03007 – Concrete Class AA (Precast Option)
Item 520.03027 - Concrete Class AA, Approach Slabs (QC/QA) (Precast Option) (F)
Item 520.12007 - Concrete Class A, Above Footings (Precast Option) (F)
Item 520.21307 - Concrete Class B, Footings (On Soil) (Precast Option) (F)

This spec ial provis ion a llows the o ptional subs titution of p recast e lements to construct
stub abutments, approach slabs, and piers for th e cast-in-place elements deta iled on the
plans. All applicable provisi ons of 520 shall apply to cast-in -place concrete except as
amended or modified below. All applicable provisions of 528 and any special provisions
to 528 shall apply to precast con crete. The QC/QA provisions of this section sh all not
apply if the precast option is selected.

Add to 520.1.1 the following:

1.1.2 This work shall consist of m anufacturing, storing, transporting, and assem bling
precast con crete substructure elem ents in cluding stub abu tments, approach s labs, and
piers, he rein referred to as “m embers”, in accordance w ith the con tract plans. The
relevant provisions of the design m ethod specified on the contract plans shall be adhered
to unless such provisions are in conflict with this specification, in which case this
specification shall govern.

1.1.3 This work shall also include the installa tion of approved ce mentitious grou t
where indicated on the plans, and/or assembly plans and shop drawings.

Add to 520.1 the following:

Page App C-3 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 1.3 Design Criteria. P recast subs titutions requ iring a re-d esign sh all m eet all the
applicable requirements from the current AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway
Bridges, including both seismic and non-seismic loading.

1.3.1 Design loads used for the development of contract plans and required for the re-
design of the optional precast m embers m ay be obtained from the Departm ent upon
request.

1.3.2 Details of the precast options are provided as an attachment to this specification.

Add to 520.3 the following:

3.13 Special Contract Requirements for Precast Members

3.13.1 Assembly Plan for Precast Concrete Members.

3.13.1.1 One assem bly plan shall docum ent all asp ects of the precast elem ent
substitution. The plan shall include but shall not be limited to:

a) shop drawings of all products

b) material requirements for other grout products proposed for use
c) method of erection proposed and the am ount and character of equipm ent to be
utilized
d) temporary support requirem ents includi ng leveling screws and/or shim s for
footings and lateral load and moment resistance for stems
e) member placement sequence
f) tolerance requirements for assembly
g) grouting plan

3.13.1.2 T he plan shall be subm itted for a pproval 60 days prior to the start of
fabrication and shall be stam ped by a Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of NH.
Multiple PE stamps may be include d on the var ious portions of the pla n, but only ONE
engineer with PE stamp shall be clearly identified as the Engineer of Record for the entire
assembly plan. All questions, comments, a nd revisions shall be coordinated with the
Engineer of Record.

3.13.1.3 The Engineer of Record for the a ssembly plan is responsible for the
precast system and its ability to resist the minimum design loads detailed on the con tract
drawings or provided in the specifications. The design loads detailed are specified to a
particular location for a cast-in-p lace solution. Loadings specific to a precast system are
not addressed and their inclusion and applicatio n shall be the sole re sponsibility of the
assembly plan Engineer of Record.

3.13.2 Pre-Placement Meeting. A pre-place ment meeting will be he ld to review

the specifications, schedule, and assem bly plan, and to discuss any special requirem ents.
The meeting will be held at least forty-five (45) days prior to the scheduled casting of any

Page App C-4 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 member. The Contract Adm inistrator sh all schedule the m eeting and invite
representatives of the Contr actor, Fabricator, and the Bur eaus of Bridge Design and
Materials and Research, along with any other party the Engineer deems appropriate.

3.13.3 All precast products used in the bridge system shall be fabricated by the same
precast plant.

Add to 520.4 the following:

4.4 The furnishing and placing of precast m embers substituted for cast-in-plac e
elements will not be measured.

Add to 520.5 the following:

5.10 Precast Option

5.10.1 No additiona l paym ent will b e m ade f or use of the pre cast construc tion
method. Payment will be made on plan quantities only.

5.10.2 The Contract final pay quantity will n ot be ad justed by the v olume of the
precast concrete or by any additional concrete thickness required for the precas t concrete
option.

5.10.3 The Contract es timated quantity f or reinforcing steel will not b e adjusted b y
the quantity of reinforcement included in the precast concrete element.

5.10.4 All costs for preparing and following the assembly plan shall be subsidiary.

5.10.5 The furnishing and placing of precast concrete members shall be subsidiary.

5.10.6 All costs for materials used in th e assembly of the precast m embers and/or
detailed in the assembly plan shall be subsidiary.

Add to Pay items and units:

520.01027 Concrete Class AA (QC/QA)

(Precast Option) (F) Cubic Yard
520.03007 Concrete Class AA (Precast Option) Cubic Yard
520.03027 Concrete Class AA, Approach Slabs (QC/QA)
(Precast Option) (F) Cubic Yard
520.12007 Concrete Class A, Above Footings
(Precast Option) (F) Cubic Yard
520.21307 Concrete Class B, Footings (On Soil)
(Precast Option) (F) Cubic Yard

Page App C-5 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 SALEM TO MANCHESTER
13933C

June 6, 2007
SPECIAL PROVISION

AMENDMENT TO SECTION 528 -- PRESTRESSED CONCRETE MEMBERS

This spec ial provis ion a llows the o ptional subs titution of p recast e lements to construct
stub abutments, approach slabs, and piers for th e cast-in-place elements deta iled on the
plans. All applicable provisions of 528 shall apply to precast concrete except as amended
or m odified below. Refer to PCINER- 06-ABC “Guidelines for Accelerated B ridge
Construction Using Pr ecast/Prestressed Concrete Com ponents” ( www.pcine.org) for
more inform ation and additional guidelies. This specification includes provisions for
self-consolidating concrete.

Replace 528.2.8.2 with the following:

2.8.2 Mix Design for Precast Substitution. The fabricator shall design and subm it
for approval the proportions a nd tes t resu lts f or a concr ete m ix which shall attain th e
minimum properties in 520 Table 1A. Compre ssive strength test cylinders shall be
sampled in accordan ce with the req uirements of AASHTO T 141, m olded and cured in
accordance with the req uirements o f AASHTO T23, and tested in accordance with the
requirements of AASHTO T 22. The perm eability shall be m easured at 56 days using
AASHTO T 277. Air entrainm ent testing shal l be in acco rdance with A ASHTO T 119
and T 152. The m inimum average com pressive strength of the proposed m ix shall be
determined using the procedure in Appendix D of 528.

Add to 528.2.8 the following:

2.8.4 Mix designs for Self Consolidating Concrete shall be subm itted for approval to
the Bureau of Materials and Research. Mix designs and m aterial testing shall conform to
the Interim Guidelines for the u se of Self-Consolidating Concrete in Precast/Pres tressed
Concrete Institute Member Plants, PCI Report TR-6-03 (www.pci.org). Submittals shall
be approved by the admixture manufacturer. Results of trial mixes shall be included with
the m ix design subm ittal and shall include all test results. Test results shall include:
compressive strength; air content; permeability; slump flow; and U-tube test. Test results
for the slum p flow shall show that the m ix meets the requirem ents for fl ow and that the
aggregate distribution and m ortar halo sha ll show no segregation or bleeding. Test
results for the U-tube test shall sh ow that the m ix is cap able of flowing around the
reinforcing. Com pression testing and perm eability testing shall be don e on rodded and
non-rodded specim ens to show that the ma terial perf orms sa tisfactorily without
consolidation.

Page App C-6 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 Amend 528.2.9 to read:

2.9 Shear Key Grout for Butted Box Beams, Shear Keys, Joints and Blockouts

Amend 528.2.9.1 to read:

2.9.1 Grout for shear keys, joints, and blockouts shall be an approved grout as listed
under Section 529A of the Qualified Products List. Ad ditional ag gregates an d/or
materials shall not be added to the m aterial during field m ixing. Gr out shall have a
minimum strength of the cast-in-place concrete that is being replaced.

Add to 528.2.10 the following:

2.10.1 Temporary supports, leveling screws, and shim s s hall be approved prior to
use.

Amend 528.3.1.4.3.1 with the following:

3.1.4.3.1 At least thirty (30) days prior to fa brication of the precas t members, a test
placement [10 feet (3 meters) in length] of the actual member section (unreinforced) shall
be poured utilizing the proposed m ethods of concrete p lacement an d curing. The
minimum ai r entrainm ent value shown in 520 Table 1A shall be held as the ab solute
minimum value f or the test se ction. Concrete that does not m eet this value shall not be
used in the test section.

Add to 528.3.4 the following:

3.4.5 Upon approval, the shop drawings shall be transferred to perm anent, archival
quality, 22 inches by 34 inches (559 by 838 mm) double m atte mylar and subm itted to
the Department.

3.4.6 The shop drawings shall be properly tit led as to project location and bridge
components similar to the Contract Plans titl e box. The shop drawi ngs shall include but
not necessarily be limited to the following:

a. Fully and accurately dim ensioned view s clearly showing the geom etry of the
members including all projections, rece sses, notches, openings, blockouts,
connections, etc.
b. Details and bending schedules of steel reinforcing clearly showing the size,
spacing, and location includi ng any special reinforci ng item s required but not
shown on the contract plans. Reinforc ing or ties provide d under lifting devices
shall be shown in detail.
c. Details and location s of all item s to be em bedded in the m embers such as
inserts, lifting devices, leveling screws, temporary supports, etc.
d. Quantities for each m ember (concrete volum e, reinforcing steel weig ht, and
total section weight).
e. Description of m ethods for curing, hand ling, storing, transpor ting, and erecting
the members.

Page App C-7 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 Add to 528.3.17 the following:

3.17.3 Rejection of precast members. T he Engineer will inspect the firs t group of
members cast (not to exceed three members) upon removal from the casting bed. Defects
will be identified and the Contractor sha ll p ropose to the Engineer in writing the
preventative m easures to be taken to elim inate those defects in the second group of
members to be cast. Defects in m embers cast in the first group may be cause for
rejection. After th e second group is cast, the m embers again will be inspected and the
Contractor shall again propose preventative measures as m ay be necessary. If other
defects occur during subseque nt casting of mem bers, th e above procedure shall be
repeated. Any defect occurring a second tim e will be cause for reje ction of the m ember
in which it occurs.

3.17.3.1 The following are con sidered d efects th at may constitute cause for
rejection:

1. Individual rock pockets or honeycomb over 6 s quare inches (3750 square mm )

in area or over 1 inch (25 mm) deep.
2. Any m ember having m ore than one hone ycomb area per side or surface even
though of smaller scope than defined above.
3. Any discontinuity or crack in the concrete that would perm it moisture to rea ch
the reinforcing steel.
4. Edge or corner breakage exceeding 12 inches (300 mm) in length or over 1 inch
(25 mm) in depth, and damaged ends where such damage would prevent making
a satisfactory joint.
5. Extensive fine cracks or checks.
6. Precast sections produced by racked or otherwise distorted forms.

3.17.3.2 The Engineer m ay approve repairs to occasional, non-recurring, an d

isolated defects. The Contractor shall subm it procedures and m aterials for repairs to the
Engineer for approval.

Add to 528.3.19 the following:

3.19.4 Dimensional Tolerances of Precast Concrete Members.

3.19.4.1 All tolerances not specified othe rwise, shall be in accord ance with P CI
MNL –135-00 “Tolerance Manual for Precast a nd Prestressed Concrete Construction”
except as modified herein.

3.19.4.2 Tolerances for all subs tructure elements shall meet o r exceed those lis ted
for Flat Structural Wall Panels except for the following items:

d, variation from specified plan end squareness or skew = +/- 1/8”

f, sweep = +/- 1/8”

3.19.4.3 Vertical joints between adjac ent w all members shall be ad equately f illed
and sealed. Grouted shear keys m ay be intr oduced, as required, to m eet fabrication and

Page App C-8 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 assembly tolerances. All shear keys introduced for fabrication and assembly convenience
shall be detailed on the shop drawings.

Amend 528.3.20.2 to read:

3.20.2 Members shall be lifted only at th e designated points by approved lifting

devices embedded in the concrete and by fo llowing proper hoisti ng procedures. The
Contractor is responsible for not ex ceeding allo wable stresses in the p recast m embers
during handling and shall include all nece ssary m ember modifications on the shop
drawings that are required to accommodate lifting and assembly loads and methods.

Page App C-9 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

Page App C-10 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 Example 2: New Hampshire DOT
Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs
The following specification was taken from a project that involved the replacement of a
bridge deck on a multi-span bridge. The prefabricated bridge elements were Full Depth
Precast Concrete Deck Slabs. This specification is a supplement to the New Hampshire
DOT Standard Specifications.

HAVERHILL, NH – NEWBURY, VT
14435

September 11, 2007

SPECIAL PROVISION

AMENDMENT TO SECTION 528 – PRESTRESSED CONCRETE MEMBERS

Item 528.62– Precast Concrete Deck Panels, Post-Tensioned (F)

Description
This special provis ion provides for full depth precast concrete deck panels with bo nded
longitudinal post-tensioning and contents of this special provision apply to this item only.
All provisions of 528 shall apply except as amended or modified below.

Add to 1.1

1.1.2 This work shall also include the desi gn, detailing, furnishing, post-tensioning
and grouting of tendons and all appurtenances required to complete a longitudinally post-
tensioned system where in dicated on the plans.

1.1.3 Terms. W herever in th is specification or in other contract docum ents the

following terms are used, the intent and meaning shall be interpreted as follows:

POST-TENSIONING- The applicat ion of com pressive force to the concrete by stressing
tendons after the concrete has been cast and cured. The for ce in the stressed tendons is
transferred to the concrete by means of anchorages.

POST-TENSIONING LAYOUT- Th e pattern, size, and locat ions of post-tensioning

tendons provided in the plans.

POST-TENSIONING SYSTEMS- A proprietary system where the nec essary ha rdware

(anchorages, confining reinforcing, wedges, strands) is suppl ied by a particular
manufacturer or manufacturers of post-tensioning components.

TENDONS- A high strength steel mem ber made up of a number of prestressing strands
or wires in a metal or plastic duct.

Page App C-11 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 STRAND- an assem bly of several high stre ngth steel wires wound together. Strands
usually have six outer wires helically wound around a single straight wire of si milar
diameter.

WIRE- A single, sm all diam eter, high stre ngth steel elem ent and, norm ally, the basic
component of strand, although some proprietary post-tensioning system s are m ade up of
individual or group of single wires.

ANCHORAGE- An as sembly of various ha rdware components, including confining

reinforcement, which secure a tendo n and its ends after it h as been stressed and imparts
the tendon force into the concrete.

WEDGES- A small conically shaped steel co mponent placed around a strand to grip and
secure it by wedge action in a tapered hole through a wedge plate.

WEDGE PLATE- A steel com ponent of the anchorage co ntaining a num ber of tapered
holes through which the strands pass and are secured by conical wedges.

SET (ALSO ANCHOR SET OR WEDGE SE T)- Set is the total m ovement of a point on
the strand just behind the an choring wedges during load transfer from the jack to the
permanent anchorages. Set m ovement is the su m of slippage of the wedges with respect
to the anchorage head and elastic deformation of the anchor components.

ANTICIPATED SET- Anticipa ted set is tha t s et which w as assum ed to occur in the
design calculation of the post-tensioning forces immediately after load transfer.

MEMBER- Mem ber shall be con sidered to m ean the concrete which is to be post-
tensioned.

Revise 2.9 to read:

2.9 Grout for Transverse Shear Keys

Revise 2.10 to read:

2.10 Post-tensioned systems

2.10.1 Post-Tensioning Strands shall conform to 2.4.

2.10.2 Post-Tensioning Bars shall conform to the requirements of AASHTO M

275M/M 275-00 (ASTM A722/A 722M-98).

2.10.3 Anchorages. All ancho rage devices shall m eet the requ irements of Section
10 of AASHTO Speci fications for Highway Bridges Division II, 2002, and latest
interims.

Page App C-12 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 2.10.4 Post-Tensioning ducts. All post-tensioning ducts shall meet the requirements
of Section 10.8.2 of AASHTO Specifications for Highway Bridges Division II, 2002, and
latest interims.
2.10.5 Grout for Bonded Post-Tensioning. Grout shall be prebagged and of a
variety specifically detailed for use in the gr outing of post-tensioning ducts. The grout
shall meet or exceed th e specified physical properties stated herein as determ ined by the
following standard and modified test methods. Grouts shall contain no aluminum powder.

Property Test Value Test Method

Total Chloride Ions Max. 0.08% b y weight of ASTM C 1152
cementitious material
Fine Aggregate (if utilized) Max Size < No. 50 Sie ve ASTM C 33
(300 micron)
Volume Change @ 24 hrs and 0.0% Shrin kage @ 24 ASTM C 1090 *
28 days hours <= 0.3 % Expansion
@ 28 days

Expansion <= 2.0% for up to 3 hours ASTM C 940

Compressive Strength @ 28 >= 5000 psi ASTM C 942

days (Average of 3 cubes)
Initial Set of Grout Min. 3 hours ASTM C 953
Max. 12 hours
Fluidity Test**
Efflux Time from Flow Cone
(a) Immediately after mixing Min. 20 sec. ASTM C 939
Max. 30 sec.
or ASTM C 939***
Min. 9 sec.
Max. 20 sec.

(b) 30 m inutes after mixing Max. 30 sec. ASTM C 939

with remixing for 30 sec.
or ASTM C 939***
Max. 30 sec.
Bleeding @3 hours Max. 0% ASTM C 940****
Permeability @ 28 days Max. 2500 coulombs at ASTM C 1202
30V for 6 hours
Freeze/Thaw durability Relative dynamic E > 95% AASHTO T 161
Procedure A

* Modify ASTM C 1090 to include verification at both 24 hours and 28 days.

** Adjustments to flow r ates will be achieved by strict com pliance with the
manufacturer’s recommendations.

Page App C-13 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 *** Grout fluidit y shall m eet either the st andard ASTM C 939 fl ow cone test or the
modified test described herein. Modif y the ASTM C 939 test by filling the cone to the
top instead of the standard level. The efflux tim e is the time to fill a one-liter container
placed directly under the flow cone.
**** Modify ASTM C 940 to conform to the wick induced bleed test described below.

a) Condition dry ingredients, mixing water, prestressing strand and test apparatus
overnight at 75 to 80° F.
b) Insert 800 m l of m ixed conditioned gr out with conditioned water into the
1,000 ml graduated cylinder. Mark the level of the top of the grout.
c) Wrap the strand with 2 -inches wide duct or electrical tape at each end p rior to
cutting to avoid splaying of the wires when it is cut. Degrease (with acetone or
hexane solvent) and wire brush to rem ove any su rface rust on the strand
before tem perature co nditioning. Insert completely a 2 0-inch leng th of
conditioned, cleaned, ASTM A 416 seven wi re strand (0.5 inch diameter) into
the 1,000 ml graduated cylinder (possibly using a centralizer). Mark the level
of the top of the grout.
d) Store the mixed grout at the temperature range listed above in (a).
e) Measure the level of the bleed water every 15 minutes for the first hour and
hourly afterward for three hours.
f) Calculate the bleed water, if any, at th e end of t he three hour test period and
the resulting expansion pe r the procedures outlined in ASTM C 940, with the
quantity of bleed water expressed as a percent of the initial grout volum e.
Note if the bleed water remains above or below the top of the grout.
2.10.5.1 Grouts shall be prebagged in plastic lined or coated bags. Stamp grout bags
with date of manufacture, lot number and mixing instructions. Any change of materials or
material sources requires retesting and certification of the c onformance of the grout with
the physical properties requirem ents. A copy of the Quality Control Data Sheet for each
lot num ber and shipm ent sent to the job site shall be provided to th e contractor by the
grout supplier and furn ished to th e Engine er. Prebagged grout with clum ps will b e
rejected.
2.10.5.2 Ma terials with a to tal tim e f rom m anufacture to u sage in excess of six
months shall be retested and certified by the supplier before use or shall be rem oved and
replaced.
2.10.5.3 Manufacturers of post-tensioning gr out seeking qualification of their
product shall provide certified test reports from an audited and independent Cement
Research Laboratory (CCRL) whi ch shows th e m aterial m eets all the requirem ents
specified herein.

Add to Construction Requirements:

3.1.7 Post-Tensioning

Page App C-14 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 3.1.7.1 The post-tensioning system shall provide a m inimum compressive force of
350 psi at transverse joints be tween panels or force detailed in the plans. Any 7-wire
strand post-tensioning system that confor ms to this specification can be considered for
use. The requirem ents of a system shall include the furnishing and installing of all
appurtenant item s necessary for the particu lar stressing system used, including but not
limited to ducts, anchorage assem blies, grout, and supplementary st eel reinforcing bars
for bursting and crack control behind anchorage assemblies and for duct support.

3.1.7.2 Shop Drawings: Shop drawings shall confor m to the requirem ents in 3.4
and additional requirements below.
1. Show fully and accu rately detailed bl ockouts, notches, recesses, p rojections,
and the like that might be required by the Contractor’s construction scheme.
2. Details of mild steel reinforcing shall be clearly shown as to size, spacing, and
location including all special reinf orcing required but not shown on the
Contract Plans. No separate paym ent will be m ade for special reinforcem ent
required to accommodate the Contractor’s method of construction.
3. Show size and type of ducts for a ll post-tensioning tendons with their
horizontal and vertical prof iles cle arly d etailed. Duct supports, grout tubes,
and vents shall be shown including t ype, size, and location, including the
elements to be installed in the cast-in-place pier diaphragms.
4. Details and locations of all o ther items to be embedded in th e girder such as
inserts, post- tensioning hardware, conduit penetrations, and the like shall be
shown.
5. Details of the anchorage system including confinement reinforcement required
for the post- tensioning system shall be shown.
6. A table giving jacking sequence, jacking forces, and initial elongation of each
tendon for all post- tensioning shall be pr ovided to Engineer at least 10 days
prior to stressing operation.
7. The Contractor shall p repare and subm it integrated drawings showing all
embedded item s such as post-tensi oning d ucts, ancho rages, an chorage
reinforcement, blockouts, reinforcing steel . These drawings shall be to scale,
shall be accurate, and shall have sufficient detail to show the relative positions
of all item s and their embedded depth. The drawings shall be adequate to
ensure that there will b e no conflict between the planned positions of the
embedded items and that the concrete cover will be adequate. In the event of
conflicts be tween post-tensioning h ardware and reinf orcement, the loc ation
and details of post-tensioning hardware takes precedence ov er the location of
mild steel reinforcem ent. The Engineer shall review such revisions b efore
work on any affected item is started.
8. Provide details and a comple te description of the post-tensioning system to be
used. Stressing details shall includ e m ethod, sequence, and procedure of
prestressing and securing tendons; rele ase procedures and equipm ent; and

Page App C-15 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 sizes and properties of tendons, anchor age plates, anchorage assem blies,
reinforcement, and equipment.
9. Data sheets for prebagged grout fo r post-tensioning tendons, m ethod of
mixing and detailed grouting procedure, equipm ent description and capacity
(including standby flushing equipment). Details to be included in grouting
procedures shall include, but is not lim ited to, intended direction of grouting,
low point from which grouting will be injected, and sequence of closing vents.
10. Qualifications of the po st-tensioning and grouting personnel. One m ember of
the crew completing the work (superintendent or foreman) shall have attended
the Am erican Segm ental Bridg e I nstitute (ASBI) Grouting Certif ication
Training Program and shall be ASBE Certified Grouting Technicians.
11. Furnish test and verification data as called for elsewhere in this Section.
12. Certified Re ports: Submit the f ollowing certif ied test repo rts prep ared by a
reputable nationally recognized independent testing laboratory:
a) Test reports on static pullout bonding strength of the corrugated ducts.
b) Certified calibration ch arts shall be furnished with each jack and gauge
used.
c) Certified c opies of test results for the post-tensioning anchorage.
Anchorage shall be so arranged that the jacking force in the tendon may be
verified prior to removal of the stressing equipment.
d) Test repo rts of tendon modulus of elasticity, ultim ate ten sile strength ,
yield streng th, elongation, com position, and in place friction tes ts if
required.
13. Stressing R ecords: The Contractor is responsible for all stressing records
including g auge pressu re and elo ngation for each tend on stressed. The
stressing lo gs shall be subm itted to th e Engin eer da ily f or rev iew an d the
Contractor shall recon cile the dif ferences with calculated values o f all
individual tendons and groups of tendons, pr ior to next load transfer erection
operation or on a weekly basis. The Contractor shall subm it a system of
tendon identification, individua lly and in groups, to expedite the tasks of the
Contractor and the Engineer in mutu al pursuit of the installation and
acceptance of the post-tensioning process. Grout logs as called for elsewhere
in this Section.

3.1.7.3 Design Computations: Four (4) sets of design com putations for the
proposed method of post-tension ing shall be subm itted for approval with the shop
drawings. The design computations shall be signed and sealed by a licensed professional
engineer, registered in the St ate of New Ham pshire, and shall include but not be limited
to the following information:

1. Computed losses for each tendon such as creep and shrinkage of concrete,
elastic shortening, relaxation of steel, losses in post-tens ioned prestressing
steel due to sequence of stressing, fric tion and take up of anchorages, and

Page App C-16 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 other losses peculiar to the m ethod or system of prestressing that m ay take
place or have been provided for.

2. Jacking force for each tendon.

3. Effective force for each tendon.

4. Anchorage bearing stress at service load.

5. All other com putations required for th e system of stressing being used,
including all re inforcing re quired to resist bursting stresses. Post-tensioned
anchorage zones shall confor m to the requirements of Section 9.21 of the
AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges.

3.1.7.4 Post-Tensioning Anchorages: All prestressing steel shall be sec ured at the
ends by m eans of perm anent type anchorin g devices that have been reviewed and
accepted by the Engineer. The anchorages shall m eet or exceed the following
requirements:
1. The anchorages shall develop at leas t 95 percent of the m inimum specified
ultimate tensile strength of the prestressing s teel, tested in an unbonded state
without exceeding anticipated set. Cer tified copies of test results for the
anchorage system to be used shall be supplied to the Engineer at no additional
cost. The anchorage sh all b e so arrange d that the prestres sing force in the
tendon may be verified prior to removal of the stressing equipment.
2. The load from the anchoring device shall be distributed to the concrete by means of
approved de vices that will effectively distribute the load to the concrete. Such
devices shall conform to the following requirements:
a) The avenge bearing stress in th e concrete created by the an chorage plates
shall no t ex ceed th e values in Section 9.2.1 an d 14.0 of Division I an d
Section 4.2 of Division II of the 1999 AASHTO Guide Sp ecifications for
Design and Construction of Segmental Concrete Bridges.
b) Bending stresses in the plates or assemblies induced by the jacking of the
prestressing steel sh all not exceed th e yield po int of th e mater ial in th e
anchorage plate when 95 percent of the ultim ate strength of the tendon is
applied or cause visible distortion of the anchorage plate, as determined by
the Engineer.
3. Should the Contractor elect to furnish an anchori ng device of a type which is
sufficiently large and which is used in conjunction with a steel g rillage embedded
in the concrete that effecti vely distributes the compressive stresses to the concrete,
the steel distribution plates or assemblies may be omitted.
4. Anchorages must be set in a plane n ormal to the axis of the tendons such that
uniform bearing on the concrete is assu red. Wedge-type anchors shall not be used
in inaccessible locations.
Anchorages shall be supplied with a steel reinforcing spiral for those tendons having
a prestressing force greater than 300 kips.
5. Anchorages shall be protected as follows:

Page App C-17 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 a) The anchoring devices shall be recessed so the ends of the p ost-tensioning
steel and all parts of the anchorage will have at least two in ches of cover
from the pa nel’s surface. The recess shall be f illed with a qualified non-
shrink grout following post-tensioning.
b) Anchorage blisters m ay be required to acco mmodate the anchorage
assemblies and the clear cover requirem ent. The Contractor can fabricate
the end panels with the anchorage assem blies and anchor blocks already
installed or can ins tall the anchorag e assem blies and fill th e anchorag e
blisters with non-shrink grout, on-site, after the panels have been erected.
c) As soon as possible, but not exceedi ng 14 days after post-tensioning is
complete, exposed end anchorages, strands and other m etal accessories
shall be cleaned of rust, m isplaced m ortar, grout and oth er deleterio us
materials. Immediately following the cleaning operation, the entire
surface of the anchorage reces s (a ll m etal and concrete) shall be
thoroughly dried and uniformly painted with an epoxy bonding com pound
conforming to AASHTO M235, Type II, in accord ance with the
manufacturer’s recommendation s. The anchorage recess s hall be f illed
with a non-shrink cem ent base d grout im mediately following the
application of the epoxy-bonding compound.
6. Local zone reinforcem ent, required fo r the perfor mance of the anchorage
(based on p revious tes ts and his tory of succes sful perform ance on other
projects) shall be provided by the Contr actor incidental to the proprietary
anchorage system selected.
7. All anchorages shall be provided w ith a perm anent non-m etallic grout cap
with gasket that f ully encapsulates the wedge plate. The gro ut cap shall be
durable and im pervious, and shall protect the strands from corrosion.
Temporary grout caps will not be permitted.

3.1.7.5 Samples for Testing:

1. The following samples of materials and devices selected at locations
designated by the Engineer shall be furnished by the Contractor at
Contractor’s expense. The Engineer shall be present at the time of sampling.
The Contractor shall notify the Engineer at least 24 hours in advance of when
samples will be taken from stored materials.
a) Three 7-foot long sam ples of prestre ssing wire or bar for each size from
each heat number or production lot.
b) Three 7-foot long sam ples of prestressing stran d for each size from each
heat number or production lot.
c) If bar couplers are to be used, th ree sam ples with two specim ens each
consisting of four foot lengths of the specific prestressing bar coupled with
a bar coupler from the materials to be used on the project.
d) One unit of each prestress anchorage to be used on the project.

Page App C-18 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 e) Samples shall be taken at least 30 days in advanc e of the tim e they are to
be incorporated into the Work.
2. All strands from each m anufactured reel to be shipped to the site sh all be
assigned an individual lot num ber and shall be tagged in such a m anner that
each such lot can be accurately identified at the job site. Each lot of anchorage
assemblies to be installe d at th e job site shall a lso be iden tified in a s imilar
manner. All unidentified prestressing st eel and anchorage assemblies received
at the site w ill be rejected and loss of positive id entification of these ite ms at
any time will be cause for rejection of their use as intended.
3. The release of any m aterial by the E ngineer shall not preclude subsequent
rejection if the m aterial is da maged in transit or later dam aged or found to be
defective.
3.1.7.6 Testing by Contractor:
1. The Contractor shall furnish manufacturer's certified reports covering die tests
required by these specification s. A certifi ed test report s tating the guaran teed
minimum ultim ate tensile s trength, yield streng th, elongatio n, and
composition shall b e furnished fo r each lot of prestress ing steel. T ypical
stress-strain curves for prestress ing st eel sha ll be f urnished. A certified test
report stating strength when te sted using the type prestressing steel to be used
in the Work shall be furnished for each lot of prestress anchorage devices.
3.1.7.7 Protection of Prestressing Steel:
1. During and after prestressing steel installation the Cont ractor shall prevent all
water, rain, snow and/or ice from entering the post-tensioning ducts.
2. When acceptable prestressing steel for post-tensioning is installed in the ducts
after com pletion of concrete curing, and if stressing and grouting are
completed within ten c alendar day s af ter the installation o f the prestr essing
steel, rust which may form during said ten days will not be c ause for rejection
of the steel, provided no pitting has developed over this period. Prestressing
steel ins talled, tension ed and groute d in the m anner, all within ten c alendar
days, will n ot require the use of corrosion inh ibitor in the duct f ollowing
installation of the prestre ssing steel. Post- tensioning steel installed as above
but not grouted within ten calendar days shall be subject to all the
requirements in this section pertaining to corrosion protection, which includes
an accep ted water so luble co rrosion i nhibitor and m ay include rejection
because of rust. The corrosion protection system shall be submitted for review
and approval prior to the start of a ny post- tensioning work. Vapor P hase
Inhibitor (VPI) is no t an accep table corro sion pro tection sys tem. The
submission for approval shall include cer tified test repo rts f rom an audited
and independent research laboratory wh ich indicates the proposed corrosion
inhibitor will provide corro sion protection in accordance with th e provisions
of Federal Specifications MIL-P-3420. B ond testing shall be also perform ed
to prove that the proposed corrosi on inhibitor does not im pair the bond
strength between the cem ent grout and prestressing steel. Appropriate
ventilation is required to avoid toxic effects.

Page App C-19 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 3.1.7.8 Post-tensioning ducts:
1. The inside diam eter of the ducts sh all be at lea st ¼” large r than the no minal
diameter of single wire, bar, or s trand tendons, or in the case of multiple wire,
bar, or multiple strand tendons, the inside cross-sectional area of the sheathing
shall be at least two times the net area of the prestressing steel. When tendons
are to be placed by the pull through method, the duct area shall be at least 2 ½
time the net area of the prestressing steel.
2. Transition couplings connecting ducts to anchoring devices shall be
galvanized f errous m etal and shall be capable of positively preventin g the
entrance of cement paste and water from concrete and of sufficient strength to
prevent distortion or displacement of the ducts during concrete placement.
3. Splices in d ucts used at the cas t-in-place con crete diaphrag ms shall be the
same m aterial as used in the m embers. Jo ints between the portion of duct
protruding from the end of the mem bers and the sp lice section sh all b e
capable of positively preventing the entr ance of cement paste and wate r from
concrete and of sufficient strength to pr event distortion or displacement of the
ducts during concrete placement. Duct tape is not considered adequate.
4. Ducts shall be security tied in position, carefully inspected, and repaired
before placing of the concrete is started, and care shall be exercised during the
placing of the concrete to avoid displacing or damaging the ducts. Metal ducts
shall be supported at interv als of not m ore than 4 f eet. Plastic ducts shall be
supported at intervals of not more than 2 feet. The tolerance on the location of
the tendons shall be plus or m inus 0.25 inches at any point and in any
direction. Visual inspection shall be used to confirm a smooth profile with no
kinks prior to closing forms.
5. After installation in the for ms and bulkh eads, the ends of the ducts shall be
sealed at all tim es to prevent entry of water and debris. Following concrete
placement, the Contractor shall d emonstrate to the Engin eer that all em pty
ducts are free of water and are unobs tructed and unda maged. Immediately
prior to in stallation of the prestre ssing steel, the Contractor shall again
demonstrate to the Engineer that all duc ts are unobstructed and that they are
free of water and debris. An acceptab le m ethod of dem onstrating that the
ducts are unobstructed and free of wate r and debris is to blow oil-free
compressed air through the full length of each duct.

3.1.7.9 Vent and Grout Injection Pipes:

1. All ducts and anchorage assem blies fo r perm anent prestressing shall be
provided with pipes or other suitable connections at each end and each s ide of
couplers for injection o f grout after post-tensioning. In addition all ducts
having a tendon profile varying in elevat ion by more than six inches shall be
vented at all high points of the tendon pr ofile and drained at all low points in
the tendon profile. In addition, gro ut vents shall be placed from 3’-6’ either
side of the high point of the tendon. Any segment of the tendon profile that is
horizontal at a high point will have a grout vent placed at no greater then 50 ft

Page App C-20 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 increments. Vents and d rains shall be ¾” minimum diameter standard pipe or
suitable plastic pipe. Waterproof tape shall be used at all conn ections
including vent and grouting pipes. Plasti c components shall not react with the
concrete or enhance corrosi on of the prestressing stee l, and shall be free of
water-soluble chlorides. The vents s hall be m ortar tigh t, tap ed as neces sary,
and shall provide m eans for injecti on of grout through the vents and for
sealing the vents. At all tim es, pipes shall be capped with water tight plastic
caps sp ecifically prov ided by the post- tensioning supplier, and shall be
protected from da mage by pedestrian, vehicle and equipm ent traffic. Any
damage to the pipe or cap shall be immediately repaired and misplaced caps
shall be immediately replaced.
2. Grout injection pipes shall be fitted with positiv e mechanical shut-off valves.
Vents and injection pip es shall be f itted with valves, c aps, or othe r d evices
capable of withstanding the pumping pressures specified herein.
3.1.7.10 Strand Installation
1. Strands shall be ins talled in the d ucts so as to avoid en tanglement and
excessive slack. The p lacement should be such that would allow a linear
elongation of the tendons when jacking from 20% to 100% of the jacking
force.
2. During and after prestsessing steel installation, the Contractor shall prevent all
water, rain, snow, and ice from entering the prestressing ducts.
3.1.7.11 Post-Tensioning
3.1.7.11.1 Stressing Tendons:

1. All post-tensioning steel shall be tens ioned by m eans of hydraulic jacks so

that the force of the prestressing steel shall not be less th an the value shown
on the approved working drawings. Th e m aximum tem porary tensile stress
(jacking stress) in prestres sing steel shall n ot exceed 80 percent of the
specified minim um ultim ate tensile st rength of the prestressing steel. The
prestressing steel shall b e anchored at stresses (initial stresses) that will result
in the ultimate re tention of permanent forces of not less than those shown on
the approved drawings, but in no case shal l the initial s tress, after anchor set,
exceed 70 p ercent of th e specified m inimum ultim ate tens ile strength o f the
prestressing steel. Permanent force and permanent stress will be considered as
the f orce a nd stre ss r emaining in the pr estressing s teel af ter a ll lo sses,
including creep and shrinkage of conc rete, elastic shortening of concrete,
relaxation of steel, losse s in pos t-tensioned prestressing steel due to sequence
of stressing, friction and take-up of anchorages, and all other losses peculiar to
the method or system of prestressing have taken place or have been provided.
2. A qualified representative of the post-tensioning m anufacturer who is s killed
and experienced in the proposed work shall be on site during all stressing
operations. The representative shall be available for (a) inspecting and

Page App C-21 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 approving all post-tensioning hardware ins tallation prior to con crete
placement; (b) stressing and anchoring tendons; (c) grouting operations.
3. Each jack used to stress tendons shall be equipped with a pressure gauge for
determining the jacking pressure. The pressure g auge shall have an accurately
reading dial at least six inches in diameter and each jack and its gauge shall be
calibrated a s a unit with the cylind er extension in the appr oximate position
that it will be at final jacking fo rce prior to stress ing the initial tendon.
Certified c alibration ch arts sh all be f urnished by an independent laboratory
with each jack and gauge used on the pr oject. Certified cali bration shall be
made at the start of the work and every six months thereafter, or as requested
by the Engineer. The calibration shall be done while the jack is in the identical
configuration as will be used on the site, e.g., sam e length hydraulic lin es. At
the option of the Contractor, calibrati ons subsequent to the in itial ram
calibration by the load cell may be accomplished by the use of a master gauge.
The m aster gauge shall be supplied by the Contractor in a protective
waterproof container capable of protecting the calibra tion of the master gauge
during shipment to a laborat ory. The Contractor shal l provide a quick-attach
coupler next to the permanent gauge in the hydraulic line, which enables the
quick and easy installation of the master gauge to verify the perm anent gauge
readings. The master gauge shall remain in the possession of and be calibrated
by the Engineer for the duration of the project. Any repair of the rams, such as
replacing the seals or changing the lengt h of the hydraulic lines, is cause for
recalibration of the ram with a loa d cell. No extra com pensation will be
allowed for the initial or subsequent ram calibrations or for the use and
required calibrations of a master gauge.
4. Post-tensioning forces shall not be applied until the con crete has a ttained the
compressive strength specified as determined by the cylinder tests.
5. The tensioning process shall be so c onducted that tension being applied and
the elongation of the post-t ensioning steel m ay be m easured at all tim es. A
record shall be kept of gauge pressure s and elongations at all tim es and shall
be subm itted to the Engineer. The post-tension ing f orce may be verif ied as
deemed nec essary by the Engineer. The tendon force m easured by gauge
pressure shall agree within seven per cent of the theoreti cal elongation. The
entire operation shall b e checked and the sou rce of error determ ined and
remedied to the satisfaction of the Engineer before proceedin g with the work.
Elongations shall be measured to the nearest 118 in. Equipm ent for tensioning
the tendons must be furnished by the m anufacturer of the system (tendons and
Contractor, may require additional bench tests and/or friction tests, should the
agreement between pressure gauge read ings and m easured elongations fall
outside the acceptable tolerances.
6. The Contractor shall submit computations showing tendon forces and
elongations after friction, wobble, and anchor set losses. Losses shall be based
on expected m odulus of el asticity and actua l friction and w obble coefficients
and anchor set losses for the system to be used. These param eters shall also
appear on the shop plans for all different tendon types.

Page App C-22 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 7. Tendons shall be stressed in the sequence shown on the approved shop
drawings. The stressing sequence shall be such that not more than one tendon
will be eccentric about the centerline of a member at any time.
8. The Contractor shall take all necessary provisions to avoid crushing of vacant
adjacent ducts during the stressing operations.
9. Prestressing steel shall be cut by an abrasive saw within 0.75 to 1.5 inches
away f rom anchoring device. Flam e cutting of prestre ssing stee l is not
allowed.
10. Within four hours after stressing, protect tendons against corrosion or harmful
effects of debris, by temporarily pluggi ng or sealing all opening and vents.
Clean rust and other debris from all m etal surfaces, which will be cove red by
the grout cap, and place the permanent nonmetallic grout cap with gasket over
the wedge plate.
3.1.7.11.2 Grouting post-tensioning ducts:
1. After the tensioning of all tendons has been completed and the prestressing
steel has been anchored , the annular space between the duct and the tendons
shall be completely filled with grout. The tendons shall be protected against
corrosion by a plug at each end to preven t the passage of air, and such plugs
shall be left in pla ce until the tendo n is grou ted. A pressur e test on the duct
shall be perform ed pri or to the grout procedure. Duct should be able to
achieve 30 psi pressure. Test should not raise pressure greater than 40 psi with
closed vents and temporary grout caps.
2. The grouting equipm ent shall include a co lloidal g rout m ixer capable of
continuous mechanical mixing which w ill produce a grou t free of lum ps and
undispersed cement. The equipment shall be able to pum p the m ixed grout in
a m anner which will com ply with all pr ovision her einafter spe cified.
Graduated m easuring equipm ent shall be used for accurate liquid
measurement. The pum ps shall be p ositive displacement type and be able to
produce an outlet pressure of at leas t 150 psi. The pum p shall have seals
adequate to prevent introduction of oil, air, or ot her foreign substance into the
grout, and to prevent loss of grout or water. A pressure gauge having a full-
scale reading of no greater th an 300 psi shall be placed at s ome point in the
grout line between the pum ping outlet and the duct inlet. The g routing
equipment shall contain a screen having clear openings of 0.125-inch
maximum size to screen the grout prior to its introduction into the grout pump.
If a grout with an ad ditive is us ed, a screen opening of 0.188 inch is
satisfactory. This screen shall be easily accessible for inspection and cleaning.
The groutin g equipm ent sha ll utiliz e grav ity f eed to the p ump inlet f rom a
hopper attached to and directly over it . The hopper m ust be kept at least
partially full of grout at all tim es during the pumping opera tion to prev ent air
from being drawn into the post-tensi oning duct. Under normal conditions, the
grout equipment shall be capable of continuously grouting the longest tendon
on the project in not more than twenty minutes.

Page App C-23 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 3. Provide back up grouting equipm ent and independent back up power supply
to ensure th at grou t placem ent can c ontinue if prim ary equipm ent or power
supply fails.
4. Mix the g rout in acco rdance with the manufacturer’s instructions using a
colloidal mixer to obtain a homogenous mixture. Perform a fluidity test on the
mixed grout, in accordance with th e grout m aterial specification s, prior to
beginning the injection process. Obtain target flow rates as a function of mixer
type used and ambient temperature from the grout manufacturer. Do not begin
the grouting process until the proper grout properties have been obtained.
5. Batches shall be placed within 30 minutes of mixing.
6. All grout openings and high point vent openings shall be open when grouting
starts. Grou t shall be a llowed to f low f rom the f irst v ent af ter the in let pipe
until all residual flushing water and entrapped air has been r emoved, at which
time the vent shall be capped or otherw ise closed. Rem aining vents shall be
closed in sequence in the same manner. Maintain a continuous flow of grout at
a rate not to exceed 30 feet of duct per m inute. The pum ping pressure at the
tendon inlet shall not exceed 250 psi. Nor mal operations shall be performed at
75 psi. If the actual grouting pressure exceeds the m aximum allowable
pumping pressure, close the injection ve nt and inje ct the grout at the next
vent, which has been, or is ready to be, closed as long as one-way f low is
maintained. Do not inject grout into a succeedin g vent from which grout has
not yet flow ed. If a one-way flow of gr out cannot be m aintained as ou tlined
above, the grout shall be immediately flushed out of the duct with water.
7. Grout shall be pum ped through the duct an d continuously wasted at the outlet
pipe until no visible slugs of water or ai r are ejected and efflux time of ejected
grout is not less th an the injected grout. Perform a fluidity test, in accordance
with the grout m aterial specificatio ns, on each tendon m easuring th e grout
discharged from the discharge outlet. The m easured grou t efflux tim e shall
meet the requirem ents of the Fl uidity Tes t listed in the grout mater ial
specifications. If the gro ut efflux time is not acceptable, discharge additional
grout from the discharge outlet. Test grout efflux tim e. Continue this cycle
until acceptable grout f luidity is ac hieved. Ensure that the tendon rem ains
filled with grout, by closing the e jection and injection ve nts in sequ ence,
respectively, under pressure when the te ndon duct is com pletely filled with
grout. Do not rem ove the positive shut-o ffs at the injection and ejection vents
or open until the grout has se t. At all tim es, the ducts shall be free of water to
avoid dam age due to freezing. T he tem perature of the concrete o r air
surrounding the tendon shall be 40 degrees F or highe r from the tim e grout is
placed un til the m inimum com pressive st rength of 800 psi, as determ ined
from tests o n 2 inch cu bes cured u nder the sa me condition as the in- place
grout, is obtained. Grout shall not be above 90 degrees F during m ixing or
pumping. If necessary, the m ixing water sh all be cooled. The waste fluid that
is flushed from the duct shall be captured and disposed of in com pliance with
applicable laws. All g rout th at spills sh all be collected an d disposed of in
compliance with applicable laws.

Page App C-24 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 8. 24-hours after grouting, the level of grout in the grout inlet pipes, vent pipes,
and grou t caps shall be inspected and topped o ff as necessary with freshly
mixed grout. Vacuum grouting or other remedial action may be required by
Engineer based on size and extent of voids found.
9. Do not remove or open valves, caps or ve nt pipes until the grout has set. Ends
of steel vents shall be removed at least 1 inch below the concrete surface after
the grout has set. Ends of plastic vents shall be removed to 1 inch below
surface of the concrete, or 1 inch below deck grade, after the grout has set.
Remove all miscellaneous material used for sealing grout caps before carrying
out further work to protect end anchor ages or filling in anchorage pourbacks
and the like. A shrinkage compensating polymer modified grout applicable for
vertical patching shall be used to patch holes left from grouting procedures.
10. Daily grou ting logs and cum ulative record boo ks shall be subm itted to the
Engineer for review and record within 72 hours of grouting. Infor mation to be
provided in the records shall include but shall not necessarily be limited to the
following: tendon number, date grouted, number of days between stressing
and grouting, brand of prebagged grout, tendon end used for injection, grout
flow test results, grouting pressure, and summary of problem s encountered
and corrective action taken.
3.2.1.1.1 For precast concrete deck panels th at are not prestressed, proof shall
be given by the Contractor that the Fabricator is capable of and has the organization and
plant for perfor ming the work in m anufacturing the panels. The fabricator shall cast a
trial panel, as required by the Engineer. All costs to manufacture the trial piece shall be
subsidiary to Item 528.62.

Revise 3.22.6 to read:

3.22.6 Installation of Partial Depth Deck Panels
Add to 3.22
3.22.7 Installation of Full Depth Deck Panels
3.22.7.1 The full depth panels sh all be set to the elevations detailed on the plans .
Final panel elevations shall be a ttained by ad justing the to rque on lev eling scr ews to
promote an equal distribution of panel dead load to all girders. The torque schedule shall
be subm itted with the shop drawings for the pa nels. The torque to lerance shall be +/-
15%.
3.22.7.2 Panels shall not be used to support construction loads until the bedding
concrete has attained a m inimum compressive strength equal to the design com pressive
strength of the panels.
3.22.7.3 The transverse shear keys and recesses between the precast slabs shall be
thoroughly cleaned prior to delivery by m eans of high pressure washing using a pressure
of at least 1000 psi and a delivery rate of not less than 4 gallons per m inute. The shear
key surface shall b e cleaned on site by air b lasting prior to placing the grout. If a pre-
bagged non-shrink grout is used, the shear keys and recesses shall be prepared and the
grout shall be placed according to the gr out m anufacturer’s r ecommendations. If a

Page App C-25 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 cement based, non-shrink grout is used (not pre-bagged) the key areas shall be wet
thoroughly prior to gro ut placem ent. The gr out shall attain a m inimum com pressive
strength of 1500 psi (or m inimum strength detailed on the plans) prior to post-tensioning
the panels longitudinally.
3.22.7.4 The deck panels shall be post-tensio ned prior to making them composite
with the girders unles s specific direction to th e contrary is detailed on the plans. See
post-tensioning requirem ents elsewhere in this special provision. Panels shall not be
post-tensioned until they have aged a minimum of 45 days.
3.22.7.5 After the shear studs have been in stalled, bedding concrete shall be
placed through the shear connector p ockets in the deck panels to completely fill the area
under the panels and over the flanges. Co mpressible foam grout dam s or te mporary
formwork shall b e used to m aintain the conc rete within the haunch. All lev eling screws
and other supplemental supports shall be removed after the bedding concrete has attained
strength. Holes lef t by the removal of th e leve ling sc rews sha ll be f illed with an
approved non-shrink grout.
Add to Basis of Payment Pay items and unit:
528.62X Precast Concrete Deck Panels, Post-Tensioned (F) Square Foot

Page App C-26 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 Example 3: Maine DOT
Precast Integral Abutments and Piers
The following specifications were taken from a project that involved the reconstruction of
a bridge in Maine. This project included prefabricated integral abutments, piers and
approach slabs.

The following pages include:

• Prosecution of Work
• Incentive-Disincentive Specification
• Modifications to the standard precast concrete specifications

Page App C-27 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 SPECIAL PROVISION
SECTION 107
TIME

(PROSECUTION OF WORK)

To subsection 107.4.2 Schedule of Work Required, add the following:

“The Contractor shall plan and conduct his operations such that the Boom Birch
Bridge will be closed f or only a sing le period of time of up to 45 days between July 9th,
2007 and September 1st, 2007. While exact sequence of operations may vary from those
found herein the following activ ities m ust be c ompleted prior to opening both lanes to
traffic:

Existing bridge must be completely removed.

All piles must be driven to meet the approval of the Resident.
Abutment and pier caps must be erected, post-tensioned, and the socket fill placed
prior to loading them.
Superstructure must be erected and shear keys grouted.
Shear key grout must be cured to a minimum strength of 3 ksi.
Superstructure must be post-tensioned.
Approach slabs must be placed.
Curbs must be cast
Bridge rail must be installed
Perm anent or temporary approach road guardrail must be installed
Approach roadway gravel must be compacted and graded to a passable condition

The post-tensioning ducts in the abutm ents may be gr outed under traffic. Fine
grading of approaches, m embrane, pavem ent, and perm anent approach road guardrail
may take place under single lan e closures with traffic controlled throug h the work zone
with flaggers.

A m inimum of 30 days prior to the road closure, the Contractor shall provide the
Department a Schedule of W ork covering sp ecifically each ac tivity to take plac e during
the closure in a Critical Path Metho d (CPM). In addition to either an activ ity on node or
an activity on arrow dia gram the contrac tor shall also provide the output from the CPM
schedules in the form of a bar chart. At a minimum, the Schedule or Work shall show the
major W ork activ ities, m ilestones, durations , and a tim eline. Durations within the
schedule should be in hours.

The Department will re view the Sc hedule of Work and pro vide comments to th e
Contractor within 7 days of receipt of the schedule. The Contractor will m ake the
requested changes to the schedule and issue the finalized version to the Department.

Page App C-28 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 SPECIAL PROVISION

SECTION 108

PAYMENT
(Incentive – Disincentive)

The Contractor shall plan and conduct operations in such a manner that the Route
116 in the vicinity of Boom Birch Bridge is closed to traffic for no more than forty-five
(45) consecutive calendar days. The said road closure may only occur between Monday
July 9th, 2007 and Saturday September 1st, 2007.

Once the Contractor commences work on this project, the work shall be
continuous through completion. During the closure the Contractor shall maintain traffic
on the detour route indicated in the Special Provision, Section 105, Use of Roads as
Detours.

The closure period starts the moment the road is closed to through traffic for both
lanes and ends the moment the road is opened to through traffic for both lanes. For the
purposes of establishing incentive and disincentives the total closure period shall be the
number of days both lanes of the road are closed to traffic.

Failure to open Route 116 to traffic across Boom Birch Bridge after a total closure
period of 45 days will result in a disincentive of $1000/day. Opening Route 116 to traffic
across Boom Birch Bridge within the forty-five (45) days total closure period will result
in a daily incentive of $1000 per day for the number of days the road is open to traffic
before the total closure period has elapsed.

The assessment of any disincentive charges to the Contractor will be in addition

to the liquidated damages specified in Section 107 - Time, of the Maine Department of
Transportation Standard Specifications.

Page App C-29 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 SPECIAL PROVISION
SECTION 534

Section 534 , Precast Structural Concrete of the Standard Specifications is added as

follows:
534.01 Description: This work shall consist of fabricating, delivering, and erecting
the precast approach s labs, the precast/post- tensioned abutm ents a nd piers, and related
material. Materials, work, inspection and documentation not specifically addressed by
this Specification sh all be done in accordan ce with the applicable section s o f the
PRECAST/PRESTRESSED CONCRETE INSTITURE ( PCI), Manual for QUALITY
CONTROL for Plants and Production of PRECAST AND PRESTRESSED CONCRETE
PRODUCTS (MNL 116), including Commentary.
534.02 Materials. Materials for precast and prestressed concrete products shall meet
the requirements of the following Sections:
Water 701.02
Air Entraining Admixtures 701.03
Water Reducing Admixtures 701.04
High Range Water Reducing Admixture (HRWR) 701.0401
Set-Retarding Admixtures 701.05
Fly Ash 701.10
Calcium Nitrite Solution 701.11
Silica Fume 701.12
Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag 701.13
Fine Aggregate for Concrete 703.01
Coarse Aggregate for Concrete 703.02
Reinforcing Steel 709.01
Welded Steel Wire Fabric 709.02
Steel Strand for Concrete Reinforcement 709.03
Post-tensioning Bar see below
The precast abutm ents and p iers shall be post-tensioned with galvanized bars
conforming to ASTM A722, Type II. Ducts fo r post-tensioning bars shall be galvanized,
metal duct suitable for the intended purpose.
Portland cement shall conform to the requirements of AASHTO M85 ( ASTM C150),
Type I, Type II, or Type III. The C ontractor shall supply the Depart ment with copies of
certified mill tests of the cement. The mill tests shall show the name of the manufacturer,
location where produced, silo number and the person or agency conducting the test.
Coarse aggregate shall confor m to the requirements of Section 703.02 - Coarse
Aggregate for Concrete, Class A, Class AA or Latex.
Concrete th at is to b e placed in v oids around the p iling shall be self-consolidating
with th e ad dition of an approved h igh-range w ater-reducing adm ixture. The conc rete
shall also have an approved expansion agen t such a s intrap last-n or an app roved

Page App C-30 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 shrinkage compensating admixture, to ensure a tight bond between the fresh concrete and
the inside of the void. At the time of placement in the abutment voids, this concrete shall
have a sp read of between 20 inches and 25 in ches with a Visual Stab ility Index o f 1.5.
Mix des igns f or all s elf-consolidating concr ete shall be tria l batch ed to: ce rtify the
standard specification requirem ents, includi ng 28 day c ompressive strength; assure
flowability consider ing reasonab le transit tim e; and dete rmine the cu ring tim e to re ach
intermediate com pressive strengths of 1 ksi and 2.5 ksi. These curing tim es shall be
reported to both the Departm ent and the C ontractor. Trial batch results m ust be
acceptable to the Resid ent prior to the closur e of the brid ge to traffic. A technical
representative from the adm ixture supplier m ust be at th e production plant for trial and
production batching.
534.03. Drawings : The Contractor shall prep are shop detail, erection and other
necessary working drawings in accordance with Section 105.7 - Working Drawings. The
drawings will be reviewed and approved in accordance with the app licable requirements
of Section 105.7. Changes and revisions to th e approved working drawings shall require
further approval by the Fabrication Engineer.
Concrete mix designs shall be part of the shop drawing sub mittal. Mix designs shall
include aggregate specific gravity, absorp tion, percent fracture, fineness m odulus and
gradation.
A copy of the Contractor’s Quality System Manual (Q.S.M.) shall be submitted when
requested by the Fabrication Engineer.
534.04 Plant : Precast, prestressed or post-tensi oned concrete products shall be
manufactured in a Precast/Pre-s tressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Cer tified facility. An
alternate facility certificate may be used at the discretion of the Engineer.
534.05 Inspection Facilities : Th e Contracto r sh all provid e a p rivate office at the
fabrication plant for inspection personnel aut horized by the Department. The office shall
have an area not less than 9.3 m ² [100 ft²] an d shall be in close proxim ity to the work.
The office s hall be clim ate controlled to m aintain the tem perature between 18°C [65°F]
and 30°C [85°F], lighted and have the exit(s) closed by a door(s) equipped with a lock
and 2 keys which shall be furnished to the Inspector(s). T he office sh all b e equip ped
with a desk or table having a m inimum size of 1200 mm by 760 mm [48 in by 30 in], 2
chairs, a telephone, telephone answering m achine, line data port, plan rack and 2-drawer
letter size file cabinet with a lock and 2 keys which shall be furnished to the Inspector(s).
The facilities and all furnis hings shall rem ain the prope rty of the Contractor upon
completion of the work. Paym ent for t he facilities , heating, lighting, telephone
installation, basic monthly telephone charges and all furnishings shall be incidental to the
contract.
534.06 Notice of Beginning W ork: The Contractor shall give the Fabrication
Engineer a minimum of two w eeks notice prior to beginning work. The Contractor shall
advise the F abrication Engineer of the producti on schedule and any changes to it. If the
Contractor suspends work on a pro ject, the Fab rication Engi neer will require 48 hours
notice prior to the resumption of work.

Page App C-31 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 534.07 Inspection : Qua lity Contro l (Q.C.) is the respon sibility of th e Contra ctor.
Quality Con trol Inspec tors (QCIs) shall h ave a valid PCI Quality Con trol Ce rtification
Level I, Level II or Level III. Personnel perform ing concrete testing shall hold a current
ACI Field Testing Technician Grade I Certification or eq uivalent, or work under the
direct supervision of an ACI certified technician.
The QCI sh all inspect all aspects of the wo rk in acco rdance with the Contracto r’s
QSM. The QCI shall record measurements and test results on the appropriate forms from
APPENDIX E of MNL 116 or an equivalent form prepared by the user. Copies of
measurements and test results shall be provided to the Quality Assurance Inspector (QAI)
as follows:
Type of Report When Provided to Q.A.I*
Material certifications/stressing calculations/ Prior to beginning work (anticipate
calibration certifications adequate time for review by QAI)
Pre-pour inspection report Prior to the concrete placement
Concrete Batch Slips The morning of the next work day
Results of concrete testing The morning of the next work day
Results of compressive testing (for release) The same work day
Concrete temperature records Provide with compressive testing (for
Release)
Non-conformance reports/repair procedures Within 24 hours of discovery
Results of compressive testing (for design Prior to stopping curing/Prior to final
strength) Acceptance
Post-pour inspection report Prior to final acceptance
*The Contractor and Q AI, by m utual agreement, may modify any part of the schedule;
however, f ailure to prov ide the docu mentation when require d will result in the prod uct
being deemed unacceptable.
The QCI s hall re ject m aterials a nd wo rkmanship that do not m eet contract
requirements. The Cont ractor may perform testing in addition to the m inimum required.
The results of all testing shall be made available to the (QAI).
Quality Ass urance (Q.A.) is the pre rogative of the Fabr ication Enginee r. The QAI
will verify docum entation, period ically insp ect workm anship, and witness testing.
Testing deemed necessary by the Fabrication Engineer in addition to the minimum testing
requirements shall be scheduled to minimize interference with the production schedule.
534.08 Inspector' s Authority : The QAI will have the auth ority to r eject m aterial or
workmanship that does not m eet the contract requirements. The acceptance of m aterial
or workmanship by the QAI will not prevent subsequent rejection, if found unacceptable.
534.09 Rejections: Rejected material and workmanship shall be corrected or replaced
by the Contracto r. In the event that an item fabricated under this Specification does not
meet the contract req uirements but is de emed suitable for use by the Fabricatio n
Engineer, said item will be paid for in accordance with Section 108.8. 1 - Substantially
Conforming Work.

Page App C-32 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 534.10 Form s and Cas ting Beds : Form di mensions shall conform to the approved
shop drawings. Form s shall be well construc ted, carefully aligned and sufficiently tight
to preven t leakage of mortar. Form s that do not m aintain the plan dim ensions within
allowable tolerances during concrete placement shall be rejected.
Each abutm ent segm ent and each p ier segment shall be match cast against the
pieces to which they will be erec ted in their final position to ensure a precise fit up in the
field.

Wood forms, if used, shall be sealed with a material to prevent absorption. The sealer
shall be applied and cured in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Forms shall be cleaned of adherent material before each use. For ms shall be cleaned
of all foreign m atter and debris im mediately prior to placing concrete. New for ms shall
be free from paint or other protective coatings.
Forms shall be treated with a non-stai ning bond breaking com pound applied in
accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
If the reinf orcing steel or post-tensioning ducts have been contam inated with the
bond-breaking compound, it shall b e cleaned with solvent. No concrete shall be placed
until the reinforcing ste el and pos t-tensioning ducts has been inspected and accep ted by
the QCI.
534.11 Reinforcing Steel: Reinforcing steel shall be fabricated, packaged, handled,
stored, placed, spliced, and repaired in accordance with Section 503 - Reinforcing Steel.
Reinforcing steel shall be accurately located and securely ancho red to prevent
displacement during concrete pl acement. All reinforcing st eel sha ll be ins talled and
secured before beginning the concrete placement.
The concrete cover shown on the approve d shop drawings sha ll be th e m inimum
allowable cover. The contractor shall us e bar supports and spacers to m aintain the
minimum concrete cover. The bar supports and spacers shall be m ade of a dielectric
material or other material approved by the Fabrication Engineer.
534.12 Voids and Inserts: Voids shall be non-absorbent. The out-to-out dim ensions
of the voids shall be within 2% of plan dim ensions. Da maged voids shall be repaired in
manner acceptable to the QAI. Voids shall b e stored, h andled and p laced in a m anner
that prevents damage. Residue fro m void pl acement shall be entirely rem oved from the
forms before beginning or continuing the concrete placement.
Voids shall be located accurately, anchored securely, capped and v ented. An y
portion of a void that is displaced beyond the allowable dimensional tolerances shall be
cause for rejection of the abutment segment.
534.13 Conventional C oncrete: Concrete m ix designs sh all be subm itted to the
Fabrication Engineer for approval a m inimum of 30 days prior to beginning work. Mix
designs previously approved for use shall not require qualification by trial batch if the

Page App C-33 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 mix design m eets all the requirem ents of th is Section. Only conventional concrete
meeting this subsection shall be used for precast concrete.
New concrete m ix designs shall be qualified by trial batches prepared in accordan ce
with AASHTO T126 (ASTM C192). The test results shall dem onstrate that the concrete
meets the requirem ents of the Plan s and th is Section. If accelerated curing is to be used
in production, the test specimens shall be similarly cured.
No concrete shall be placed until the m ix design has been appr oved. Approval of the
mix design does not relieve the Contractor of the responsibility of m eeting the
requirements of this Section during production.
The concrete mix design shall meet the following requirements:
Table 1
Maximum cement content 660 lb/yd3
Maximum cementitious material 685 lb/yd3
Water-cement ratio 0.42 maximum
Air entrainment 5½ % - 7½ %
Allowable slump 5 inch to 10 inch
Calcium Nitrite* 3 gal/yd3
Silica Fume (when required) 5% - 10% of cement content by weight
Fly Ash 40% of cementitious material maximum
Slag 50% of cementitious material maximum
*The water in th e Calcium Nitrite s olution sha ll be inc luded when ca lculating th e
water/cement ratio
The batching equipm ent, mixers and deliv ery equipment shall m eet the requirem ents
of MNL 116. Concrete shall be batched, m ixed and hand led in acco rdance with MNL
116.
534.135 Self-Consolidating Concrete: Self-consolidating concrete shall be trial batched
to achieve the desired properties as discussed in 534.02 Materials.
534.14 Concrete Placem ent: The first two loads of concrete from each placem ent
shall be tested by the QCI for temperature, air entrainment, and slump. If the first load is
unacceptable, the second load shall be tested as the first. This process shall continue until
two consecutive lo ads are found acceptab le. After two consecutive loads are found
acceptable, the frequency of testing shall be at the discretion of the QAI.
Concrete sh all be tes ted if there is a change in the dosage rate of any adm ixture, a
change of 2 inches or m ore in sl ump or a change of more than 5 °F [3 °C] in m ix
temperature.
Any load of 1 yd 3 or less from a stationary m ixer or 2 yd 3 or less from a transit mixer
shall be tested for air entrainm ent, slum p, and tem perature prior to being placed in the
form.

Page App C-34 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 Concrete shall be placed as nearly as possibl e to its final location. The depth of a lift
shall be controlled in order to m inimize en trapped air voids in conventional concrete
castings. The m aximum depth of an uncon solidated lif t shall be 18 inches in
conventional concrete castings. Concrete shall be vibrated with inte rnal or internal and
external vibrators in conventional concrete castings. External vibrat ors shall not be used
alone. Internal vibrators sha ll be inser ted ve rtically and penetr ate th e lower lay er of
concrete by at leas t 4 inches. The vibra tors shall be inse rted to assure that the rad ii of
action of the vibrators overla p. T he vibrators shall be held in position from 5 t o 15
seconds. Vibrators shall not be used to m ove concrete horizontally. In concrete that is
made self-consolidating, the am ount of vibr ation and m aximum dept h of lifts shall be
determined during th e trial batching process with input from the Departm ent, the
Manufacturer’s Technical Representative, and the Contractor.
When concrete placements are interrupted, no more than 60 minutes shall elapse from
the time of the beginning of the placem ent and the resum ption of the concrete placem ent
when the concrete tem perature is below 75 °F. When the concrete temperature is above
75°F, the elapsed tim e shall be red uced to 30 m inutes. Cold jo ints sha ll m ake the unit
subject to rejection.
No water shall be added to the concrete after batching. HRWR may be added to the
concrete after batching if that p ractice conforms to the m anufacturer’s published
recommendations. Concrete that becomes unworkable shall be discarded.
534.15 Process Control Test Cylinders: All pr ocess contro l test cy linders shall be
made and tested in accordance with the following Standards:

AASHTO T23 (ASTM C31/C31M) Practi ce for Making and Curing Concrete
Test Specimens in Field
AASHTO T22 (ASTM C39) Test Met hod for Com pressive Strength of
Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
AASHTO T119 (ASTM C143) Test Method for Slum p of Hydraulic Cem ent
Concrete
AASHTO T141 (ASTM C172) Practice for Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete
AASHTO T152 (ASTM C231) Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed
Concrete by the Pressure Method
ASTM C1064 - Test Method for Temperatur e of Freshly m ixed Portland Cement
Concrete
A m inimum of 8 concrete test cylinders shall be cast to repr esent each continuous
concrete placem ent. Si x of the cylinders from each test shall be cured under the sam e
conditions as the units. Unit identification, entrained air content, water-cem ent ratio,
slump and temperature of the sampled concrete shall be recorded by the Contractor at the
time of cylinder casting. Testing shall be done in the presence of the QAI. The QAI will
designate the loads to b e tested. Cylinde rs made to determine handling strength shall be
made during the last 1/3 of the placement.
At least on ce a week, the Contractor sh all make four cyli nders for use by the
Department. They shall be cured in accordance with AASHTO T23 (ASTM C31/C31M).

Page App C-35 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 If the Contractor fails to m ake enough cylinders to dem onstrate that the product
meets the contract requirements, the product will be considered unacceptable.
The standard size test cylinder for acceptan ce shall be 6 inches by 12 inches. If 4
inch by 8 inch cylinders are used for acceptance, the compressive strength values shall be
reduced by 5%. The com pressive strength of the concrete sh all b e determ ined by
averaging the compressive strength of two test cylinders made from the same load.
For the purp ose of accep tance, the average of two cylinders shall m eet or exceed the
design strength, and, neither cylinder shall be more than 500 psi. below the required
strength.
534.16 Abutment and Pier Segment Curing: Immediately after the concrete has been
finished, the product shall be covered with an imperm eable barrier to prevent m oisture
loss. The barrier shall be tight to the form and securely fastened. The exposed surface of
the concrete shall be kept moist. T he Cont ractor shall monitor and record the concrete
temperature during the initial curing cycle.
After the product has been removed from the form, moist curing shall continue until it
has reached design strength. All surfaces of the product shall b e kept m oist and the
product shall be placed in a m oisture retention enclosure with a relative humidity not less
than 80%. The product shall not be exposed to tem peratures below 50 °F until de sign
strength is achieved.
Membrane curing compounds shall not be used without the approval of the
Fabrication Engineer. If approved, the com pound shall be applied in strict acco rdance
with the m anufacturer’s publishe d instructions. The Contractor shall provide the QAI
with the product data sheet for the com pound prior to a pplication. The com pound shall
be applied immediately after stripping. Conc rete shall have reached stripping strength
prior to handling abutment and pier segments.
534.165 Curing Self co nsolidated concrete placed within v oids, around piling : An
approved mem brane curing com pound shall be applied in strict accordance with the
manufacturer’s published instructions.
534.17 Accelerated Cu ring (Optio nal): Accelerated curing shall begin after th e
concrete has attained its ini tial set. Initial se t shall b e determ ined in accordan ce with
ASTM C403, Standard Test Meth od f or Time of Settin g of Concrete Mix tures by
Penetration Resistance. A stre ngth gain of 500 psi. indicates initial set. The Contractor
shall provide documentation that the mix design being used has been tested in accordance
with ASTM C403. Acc elerated curing shall begi n after the concrete has attained initial
set. Application of heat m ore tha n 8 hour s after initial set will not be considered
accelerated curing.
The enclo sure tem perature m ay be increased b y a m aximum of 10 °F/hour prior to
initial set. The total temperature gain prior to initial set shall not exceed 40°F.

Page App C-36 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 After initial set, the temperature gain of the concrete shall not exceed 40°F/hour. The
concrete temperature shall attain a m inimum temperature of 120 °F and that tem perature
shall be m aintained for a m inimum of 8 hours. The m aximum allowable concrete
temperature shall be 180°F. Concrete temperature shall be measured near each end of the
casting bed and at intervals not to exceed 100 feet.
The cooling rate from m aximum accelerat ed curing tem perature shall not ex ceed
40°F/hour. The cooling rate shall continue un til the concrete tem perature is within 40 °F
of the ambient air temperature.
Steam curing shall take place in an enclosure that allows the free circulation of steam.
Steam jets shall provide a uniform distribution of steam without di scharging directly on
the product or the test cylinders.
When radiant heat is used, the Contractor sh all take m easures to assure that there is
no moisture loss from the product. Free water shall be present on all exposed surfaces at
all times.
Recording thermometers that indicate the time/temperature relationship shall be used
by the Contractor until transfer /stripping strength has been achieved. Copies of the
time/temperature records shall be made available to the QAI.
If the units have achieved 80% of design st rength during the curing cycle, no further
curing will be required.
534.20 Finishing Concrete and Repairing Defects Products fabricated under this
Section shall meet Standard Grade finish requirements as defined in MNL 116 when they
are hidden from view in their final position by backfill or riprap, all other surfaces will be
considered exposed to view and will require a special architectural finish.
For portion s of product not ex posed to view in their final position th e
recommendations of Standard Grade finish requirements shall be mandatory.
Portions req uiring an ar chitectural finish shall m eet th e following standards. No
projections from the surface along the length of each piece will be allowed, uniform color
and textu re, no visible form tie holes patche d o r otherwise, all su rface v oids filled. In
order to assure uniformity in appearance of the exposed abutm ent fac e, prior to any
production work the Precaster shall prepare a sample measuring 24 inch by 24 inch by 6
inch for acceptance by the Department on an aesthetic and cosmetic basis; this piece shall
be used throughout production as the standard by which all abutment surfaces exposed to
view in their final position are compared for acceptance of the finish.
Structural defects sha ll be repaired by a m ethod a pproved by the Fabrication
Engineer. Structural defects shall include, but not be lim ited to exposed reinforcing steel
or strand, cracks in bearing areas, through cracks and cracks 0.0125 inches or m ore in
width that extend m ore than 12 inches. Th e C ontractor shall subm it a proposed repair
procedure for structural repairs to the Fabrication Engineer. No structural repairs shall be
made without the QAI being present. The QAI shall be given adequate notice before
beginning repairs.

Page App C-37 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 Chamfers a nd drip notches shall be m ade s mooth and uniform . Keywa ys shall be
sandblasted to remove mortar paste.
On surfaces not exposed to v iew in thei r final position ho neycombing, ragged o r
irregular edges and other cosm etic defects shall be repaired using a product from the
MDOT Prequalified List for Patching Materials. The repair, including preparation of the
repair area, m ixing, application, and curing of the patching m aterial shall be in
accordance with th e m anufacturer’s published instructions. Edges no t exposed in the
final product m ay be ground sm ooth with no furt her repair necessary if the depth of the
defect does not exceed one-half inch. Form ties shall be re moved to a depth of not less
than 1 inch from the face of the concrete and patched using a cem entitious m ortar or
patching compound.
534.22 Tolerances: Tolerances for precas t units shall be in confor mance with th e
latest edition of MNL 116, as applicable.
534.23 Transportation and Storage: The precast products m ay only be handled,
moved or transported after the 28 day design strength has been attained.
Prestressed products shall be stored and transported so that the reactions with
respect to the unit sha ll be approx imately the same during transporta tion and storage as
the product in its final position. The product shall be handled so that only a vertical force
is applied to the lifting devices.
Stored products shall be supported a bove the ground on dunnage in a m anner to
prevent twisting or distortion. Products sh all be protected from di scoloration and
aesthetic damage.
Units dam aged by im proper s toring, hoisti ng or handling shall b e replaced by the
Contractor.
534.26 Post-Tensioning and Pile Socket Filling: Immediately before post-tensioning
abutment segments and pier segments, the match cast joint shall be coated with an
adhesive epoxy, Sikadur 32 or approved equal, in accordance with the manufacturer’s
published recommendations. A lockoff tension of 166,000 pounds per bar shall be
applied to lateral post-tensioning bars.
Recesses at ends of lateral post-tensioning ducts shall be filled with grout using the
same type cement as that in the abutment segments. Prior to installing the grout, the
stressing pockets shall be clean of any dirt, grease, oil, or other material that may prevent
bonding. Grouting shall be completed within 10 days of lateral post-tensioning. Backfill
of abutments and erection of precast superstructure shall not be allowed until post-
tensioning of all substructure caps is complete.

After the post-tensioning of a precast unit is c omplete, fill the socket for the tops of
the piles with self -consolidating concrete. Test cylinders cured in the same environment
as the socket fill concrete must demonstrate that the fill concrete has reached 2.5 ksi prior
the application of any gravity loads on the precast segm ents. Backfilling of abutm ents
may proceed once the abutment socket fill concrete has reached 1.0 ksi.

Page App C-38 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

 534.27 End anchorage, Ducts & Grout: En d anchorag e shall b e the plate
anchorage detail as m anufactured by Dywidag-Systems International or approved equal.
They shall be shown in deta il on th e worki ng drawings, and shall be form ed in such a
manner that 2 inches of cover is provided to the ends of the post- tensioning bar in the
final product. Grout tubes shall be installed at each duct in each end of each segm ent for
a total of : 8 grout tubes required for each abutm ent post-tensioning du ct; and 6 grout
tubes required for each pier post-ten sioning duct. Ducts shall be galvan ized corrugated
metal ducts. Grout for post-tensioning ducts shall be either Five Star Special Grout 400
or Masterflow 1205. Alternate high strength specially graded pum pable cable grouts
will be considered for approved by the engineer upon request.
534.28 Method of Measurem ent: Precast s tructural concrete will be m easured by
the lump sum.
534.29 Basis of Paym ent: All work done under Precast St ructural Concrete will be
paid for at the contract lump sum price. Payment will be full compensation for furnishing
all m aterials in th e precast unit including, precast concrete, reinforcing steel, post-
tensioning bars, ducts and rela ted materials and work. Re lated materials and wor k will
include, but not be lim ited to, erecting the pr oducts, grouting of duc ts, post-tensioning
operations, providing and apply ing adhesi ve epoxy, providing and p lacement of socket
filling, and any concrete adm ixtures used. The quantity shown on the Plans for
estimating purposes is both the precast concrete and the socket filling concrete.
Payment will be made under:
Pay Item Pay Unit
534.76 Precast Abutment Lum p Sum
534.7601 Precast Approach Slab Lump Sum
534.7602 Precast Pier Lump Sum

Page App C-39 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

Page App C-40 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 Example 4: Texas DOT
Precast Column Connections
The following pages contain portions of a Texas DOT research project for the connection
of precast bent caps using grouted post-tensioning sleeves. The research report for this
work is as follows:

Development of a Precast Bent Cap System [49]

Authors: E.E. Matsumoto, M.C. Waggoner, M.E. Kreger, S.L. Wood and J.E.
Breen
The University of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation Research
Published: January 2001
Design Methodology: Pages 251-309

The following pages include:

• Chapter 7 – Development of a Precast Connection Specification
• A sample specification for this connection

Page App C-41 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications

Page App C-42 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 CHAPTER 7:
DEVELOPMENT OF A PRECAST CONNECTION SPECIFICATION

7.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter summarizes the development of a connection specification for a precast bent cap system,
referred to as a precast connection specification. Major components of the specification are developed
based on results from Phases 1-3. The following areas are addressed: 1) materials, 2) precast bent cap
placement plan, 3) grouting operations, and 4) additional items.

7.2 MATERIALS
To ensure selection of a proper grout, the connection specification should include a grout specification.
In addition, properties of connectors and connection hardware should be carefully specified.

7.2.1 Non-Shrink Grout

Table 7.1 is a modified version of Table 2.6, the grout specification for a precast bent cap system. Based
on Phase 1-3 tests, the properties specified in Table 2.6 were modified to address mechanical,
compatibility, constructability, and durability properties. The reader is referred to Chapters 2 through 5
for background information on construction and grouting issues.

7.2.1.1 Mechanical Properties

The compressive strength requirement for grout is intended to: 1) provide for transfer of forces between
connectors, grout, ducts, and/or concrete, 2) provide timely strength gain for rapid construction, and
3) ensure the grout is not the weak link in the connection system. Phase 1-3 tests indicated adequate grout
strength for transfer of connection forces, even for the majority of cases in which the grout strength was
less than that of the surrounding concrete. All of the tested grouts were expected to satisfy the strength
gain requirements of Table 2.6, although this did not always occur. Masterflow 928 (MF928) exhibited
the most consistency in achieving strength gain. Although the grout specification provides a reasonable
minimum requirement for strength gain, project-specific requirements may be more or less stringent.
Thus, the engineer should not rely solely on the grout specification, but should specify in the plans the
required minimum grout strength for beam placement and the final grout strength. The contractor, in
turn, is required to select a grout that achieves the necessary strength at the critical stages.
Only in one test was the grout considered to be the weak link in the system (Phase 2, VD04, Euclid Hi-
Flow [EHF]). In the VD04 pullout tests, the grout strength was just 55% of the strength of the
surrounding concrete (3.1 ksi, modified grout cube strength compared to a concrete strength of 5.6 ksi).
As mentioned in Chapter 1, others have reported excellent anchorage and response for grouted vertical
duct connections when the grout strength was approximately equal to or as much as 1.4 ksi greater than
the concrete strength [1.30,1.31].
Based on the previous discussion, it is recommended that: 1) the grout cube compressive strength satisfy
the requirements of Table 7.1, and 2) the modified grout cube strength at 28-days, based on a 0.8 factor,
exceed the specified 28-day concrete compressive strength by a minimum of 1000 psi. Many
prepackaged grouts satisfy these two requirements. A 1000-psi margin accounts for the likelihood that
the actual concrete strength will exceed the specified strength as well as the possibility of a low grout
strength. The 28-day grout cube strength was increased to 5800 psi in Table 7.1 to provide a 1000-psi
margin for Class C concrete.

311
Page App C-43 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
If a bent cap uses 5000-psi concrete, then grout with a 28-day (unmodified) cube strength of at least
7500 psi is required. A number of such grouts are available. Engineers should be careful to ensure that
they select a grout with a compressive strength based on the water required for fluid consistency. Grouts
mixed to a flowable or plastic consistency in accordance with ASTM C 230 achieve a higher compressive
strength but inadequate fluidity for grouting voids in a precast bent cap system. Manufacturers’ data
sheets typically list compressive strengths for all three consistencies.

7.2.1.2 Compatibility
Compatibility requirements are related to volume stability, modulus of elasticity, and coefficient of
thermal expansion. Table 7.1 uses the same values as those defined in Table 2.6. The values for the
modulus of elasticity and coefficient of thermal expansion provide a fairly close match for grout and the
surrounding concrete. As mentioned in Chapter 2, ASTM C 1107 allows three grades of shrinkage-
compensating grouts (Table 2.5): Grade A—prehardening volume-controlled type, Grade B—post-
hardening volume-controlled type, and Grade C—combination volume-controlled type. MF928 is a
Grade B grout, whereas EHF and Sika 212 are Grade C. Tests confirmed that for connections using
Grade B and Grade C grouts, cracking did not develop in the connection region prior to loading. No
deficiencies in behavior were attributed to Grade type. Thus, Table 7.1 lists either Grade B or Grade C as
acceptable grout types. Grade A grouts were eliminated because they can produce as much as a 4-percent
volume expansion before the grout hardens, possibly causing a reduction in density of the hardened grout,
as well as larger shrinkage stresses.

7.2.1.3 Constructability
Proper grout flowability is a key to successful construction of a precast bent cap system. Table 7.1
specifies a fluid consistency for grout, with an efflux time, or flow, between 20 and 30 seconds as
determined by the Flow Cone Method per CRD-C 611 and ASTM C 939. The lower limit has been
changed from Table 2.6, which specified a flow between 10 and 30 seconds.
In tests that used grouts with a flow that longer than 30 seconds, the greater grout viscosity slowed down
the venting of air bubbles from the grout, often resulting in an air void at the top of the pocket. This could
provide a moisture path into the connection and threaten durability. On the other hand, a grout with too
short of a flow time may be indicative of segregation. This was observed particularly with Sika 212 grout
in Phases 2 and 3. Segregation resulted in a denser grout at the bottom of connections, but pasty, weak
material near the top surface. To prevent segregation, the lower range has been increased to 20 seconds.
When needed, ice or warm water may be used in grout mixing to help adjust the flow. For some
temperature ranges, this will also increase the working time. No problems with set time were observed in
the test program. Thus, the range was not changed from Table 2.6.
The working time, or pot life, of the grout is a crucial consideration in grout selection. Based on Phase 2
and 3 grouting, it is expected that a contractor will require approximately 15 minutes to gravity-flow
grout a 30-in. deep cap with a double line grout pocket connection or a connection with four ducts.
Although longer times should be estimated for deeper caps or additional ducts, grouting of an individual
connection is not expected to require more than 30 minutes. Pumping of grout is expected to reduce
grouting time. It is important that the estimate of the total grouting time account for: 1) conducting the
flow cone test, 2) transferring grout from the mixer to dispensers, 3) transporting grout to point of
placement, and 4) grouting one or more connections. Water and air temperatures at the jobsite must also
be considered.

312
Page App C-44 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 Table 7.1 Precast Bent Cap Grout Specification
Property Values
Mechanical Age Compressive strength
(psi)
Compressive strength 1 day 2500
(ASTM C-109, 2” cubes) 3 days 4000
7 days 5000
28 days max[5800,
1.25(f’ccap+1000)]
Compatibility

Expansion requirements Grade B or Cexpansion per ASTM C 1107

(ASTM C 827 & ASTM C 1090)

Modulus of elasticity 3.0-5.0×106 psi

(ASTM C-469)

Coefficient of thermal expansion 3.0-10.0×10-6/deg F

(ASTM C-531)
Constructability

Flowability fluid consistency

(CRD-C 621/ASTM C-939) efflux time: 20-30 seconds

Set Time (ASTM C-191)

Initial 3-5 hrs
Final 5-8 hrs

Durability

Freeze Thaw (ASTM C-666) 300 cycles, RDF 80%

Sulfate Resistance expansion at 26 weeks < 0.1%

(ASTM C-1012)

7.2.1.4 Durability
As mentioned in Chapter 2, grout durability should be at least equal to that of the surrounding concrete,
and proprietary grouts are often formulated to achieve this. Because examination of grout durability was
beyond the scope of this research, specific properties of proprietary grouts were not investigated.
Requirements listed in Table 7.1 should be checked against project-specific requirements. In addition,
manufacturers should be consulted for available properties, such as resistance to freeze-thaw, chlorides,
sulfates, and scaling.
In some cases, specially-modified grouts such as latex-modified grouts may be useful. Such grouts
cannot be recommended based on the scope of this research. However, future research may show other
alternatives to be viable. Specifying durability requirements for a cementitious grout is generally
expected to eliminate lesser quality grouts. However, engineers should be careful that grouts do not
satisfy durability requirements at the expense of other required properties.

313
Page App C-45 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
The following minimal provisions are recommended in selecting durable grouts: 1) grouts should be
chloride-free, 2) grouts should use non-metallic formulations. Bleed properties should also be reviewed,
if available.
Provisions for durability enhancement of the connection region are discussed in Chapter 6.

7.2.2 Connection Hardware

Connection hardware refers to connectors, ducts, anchor plates, shims, and other similar items required
for connection construction. Connector and duct requirements are discussed in Chapter 6. Connectors
should conform to the requirements of the Materials section of the Precast Connection Specification.
The engineer should specify in the plans any requirements for plates and other items necessary for
anchorage of bolted connections. These items were not addressed in a detailed way in Phases 2 and 3.

7.2.2.1 Shims
Shims were found to be a reliable means for cap support. In Phase 2, both steel and plastic shims were
effective for cap placement. Shims were glued together and to the column or pile surface to prevent
movement. In Phase 3 the contractor did not glue individual shims together or glue shimpaks in place.
Workers thus found steel shims to provide better stability than plastic shims.
It is recommended that both steel and plastic shims be permitted. Plastic shims should be an engineered
multipolymer high-strength plastic. Specific measures to prevent movement of shims during cap
placement should be detailed in the plan sheets. Prior to cap placement, the underside of the cap should
be checked to ensure a flat bearing surface. Two shims may be used at exterior columns or piles to ensure
bearing on at least three of the four shims. To facilitate complete grouting of the bedding layer, the total
shim plan area should be limited to approximately 10% of the pile or column top area. Limiting
individual shims to an aspect ratio of two may also help. Shims should be sized to ensure the allowable
bearing stress at both concrete surfaces is not exceeded. In addition, shims should be placed at least 2 in.
away from surface edges to help ensure grout completely surrounds shims. Additional cover may be
required for corrosion protection of steel shims.

7.3 PRECAST BENT CAP PLACEMENT PLAN

To ensure the contractor uses an appropriate construction sequence and carefully plans all operations
associated with cap placement, the contractor should submit a Precast Bent Cap Placement Plan to the
engineer for approval prior to mixing a trail batch of grout. This plan should include: 1) a step-by-step
description of the construction sequence, 2) a step-by-step description of grouting operations, 3) the
method for cap support prior to and during grouting, 4) manufacturer’s literature for a minimum of two
candidate connection grouts, and 5) manufacturer’s literature for connection hardware.

7.3.1 Construction Sequence

Example construction sequences for a precast bent cap system are discussed in Section 2.2. The
contractor should completely describe the proposed construction sequence. In addition, a description of
other pertinent information should be outlined, such as the method to provide anchorage holes in the piles
or columns (i.e., embedded sleeves vs. drilled holes) or the use of special devices to assist in threading the
cap over connectors.

7.3.2 Grouting Operations

A detailed description of grouting operations should address formwork, air venting, grouting method, and
sequence of steps. These issues are discussed in Section 7.4.

314
Page App C-46 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
7.3.3 Cap Support
The contractor should indicate the method and hardware for cap support prior to and during grouting.
Hardware will likely consist of shims, friction collars, bearing plates and leveling nuts, shoring or other
systems. The contractor should define the support systems and provide product information, material
descriptions, and drawings, as appropriate.

7.3.4 Manufacturer’s Literature for Candidate Grouts

The contractor should identify two candidate grouts for connections and provide the manufacturers’
literature. Selected grouts should satisfy the grout criteria listed in Table 7.1. In addition, literature
should indicate mixing requirements, working time, curing requirements, and other pertinent information.
Two grouts should be selected in the event that the first grout is found unacceptable during the trial batch.

7.3.5 Manufacturer’s Literature for Connection Hardware

The contractor should also provide manufacturers’ literature for all connection hardware to be used.

7.4 GROUTING
The precast connection specification should include specific requirements for all grouting operations,
including: 1) a trial batch, 2) formwork, 3) presoaking, 4) pre-grouting meeting, and 5) grouting methods.
The following sections discuss these requirements.

7.4.1 Trial Batch

The trial batch of grout should be prepared a minimum of two to four weeks prior to connection grouting.
The requirement for a trial batch is especially important because a trial batch enables contractor personnel
to assess the suitability of a grout for constructability and strength, and also provides the contractor
valuable experience. During Phase 3, the contractor confirmed the importance of a trial batch. As
mentioned in Section 5.2.5.1, the specific purposes of a trial batch are:
1. To determine the required amount of water to be added to a particular grout brand to achieve
acceptable flowability using the CRD-C 611/ASTM C 939 Flow Cone Method under the
temperature conditions expected in the field
2. To determine the grout cube strength corresponding to the flow achieved
3. To examine grout for undesirable properties such as segregation
4. To establish the adequacy of proposed grouting equipment such as the mixer, tremie tubes,
funnels, buckets, and vent tubes
5. To provide jobsite personnel experience in mixing and handling grout prior to connection
grouting
6. To help the contractor to make a judicious decision regarding grout brand
The following sections highlight important lessons learned during Phase 1-3 grouting, which should be
applied in trial batches.

7.4.1.1 Equipment
The contractor should use the proposed grouting equipment in all mixing and grouting operations.
Equipment such as a mortar mixer, tremie tubes, funnels, buckets, and vent tubes should be carefully
selected. The proposed mixer for actual grouting should be used for mixing trial batches. High-speed
hand drills mix grout more thoroughly, but cannot produce a sufficient volume for connection grouting.
The inside diameter of the tremie tube should be large enough for grouting in a timely manner, but small

315
Page App C-47 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
enough to drain the funnel volume gradually so that a continuous grout flow is maintained. In addition,
the outside diameter of the tube should be small enough to fit between the duct walls and connectors.
Funnels should be large enough to ensure a continuous flow of grout within the tube. A minimum funnel
size of 4 quarts is recommended. A pinch valve in the tube is recommended and should be required for
cases in which an interruption in grouting operations may occur. Bucket volume should be at least
5 gallons. The inner diameter of air vent tubes should be at least 0.5 in. Transparent vent tubes will
accommodate visual inspection of air venting better than opaque tubes or vent holes. A 0.5-in. minimum
wire mesh (hardware cloth) should be used as a filter to remove potential clumps when dispensing grout
from the mixer.

7.4.1.2 Grout Flowability

A main purpose of the trial batch is to determine the required amount of water to be added to a
prepackaged grout to achieve acceptable flowability in the field. The trial batch of grout should be mixed
using water at a temperature corresponding to that expected for field grouting, and also at the expected
ambient air temperature. This is important, as some grouts only achieve the fluidity and strength stated in
the literature when mixed at an ideal temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. The manufacturer’s
recommended amount of water to achieve fluid consistency may be used in the first batch.
After mixing in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations, the grout should be inspected for
undesirable properties such as segregation or clumps. A minor amount of settlement of grout solids
during mixing is acceptable, but grouts exhibiting significant segregation (e.g., clear separation between
mix water and fine aggregate) should not be used. Grout segregation may lead to the formation of gaps at
the bedding layer or produce cavities at the top of the cap. Gaps or cavities may threaten connection
durability and/or reduce the ability of the connection to transfer forces. Clumps may result when a low-
speed mortar mixer is used with a large volume of grout.
The flow time should be determined using the CRD-C 621/ASTM C 939 Flow Cone Method. When
collecting grout for the flow cone test, a representative portion of the grout should be used. Grout should
not be obtained by skimming the top surface of grout from a mixer, as grout tends to be more fluid at the
top. A 0.5-in. mesh should be used to eliminate clumps from grout used for the flow cone test. Two flow
cone tests should be conducted: one immediately after mixing and a second at the expected pot life of the
grout. The second test is intended to confirm that a batch of grout will maintain a suitable flowability
throughout grouting operations.
If the flow time falls outside of the 20 to 30 second range, then one of the following actions should be
taken: 1) slightly change the amount of water, as long as it is still within manufacturer’s
recommendations, or 2) use cold or warm water to adjust the flow. If this does not produce an acceptable
flow, another brand of grout should be used. In each case, a new batch of grout should be mixed.
Remixing, or retempering, of grout mixtures should not be permitted, as it can change grout properties
and introduce extra air into the mix. In some cases, slightly increasing the amount of water (e.g., 10%)
may significantly increase the flow. However, this will also reduce the grout strength.
A TxDOT Materials representative should assist in conducting the flow cone test, and should prepare and
cure a minimum of nine grout cubes for each candidate grout that achieves a suitable flow. A commercial
testing laboratory approved by the engineer or a TxDOT Materials representative should test the grout
cube specimens. At least two cubes should be tested at 1 day, 3 days, 7 days and 28 days.

7.4.1.3 Trial Grouting Operation

Only grouts that achieve a suitable flow should be used in a trial grouting operation. All equipment
proposed for actual grouting operations should be used in a simple, mock grouting operation. Grouting
operations should test the suitability of tremie tubes, funnels, vent tubes, and other equipment proposed
for use. This allows the grout to be further inspected for workability, segregation and excessive bleeding.

316
Page App C-48 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
Tamping of grout is recommended instead of vibrating. However, if a vibrator is proposed for use, it
should be approved by the grout manufacturer and tested during the trial grouting operation. Care must
be exercised in using vibrators because excessive agitation can entrap air in the grout.
Depending on the project requirements, grouting operations may encompass a wide range of activities,
from forming and grouting a mock-up of an actual connection detail to grouting a simple box or circular
form. It is left to the discretion of the engineer to judge what is reasonable and prudent. However, the
trial grouting operation should closely simulate the actual field conditions, including physical constraints,
temperature, etc.

7.4.1.4 Scheduling, Weather Restrictions, Admixtures

7.4.1.4.1 Scheduling of Trial Batch
It is recommended that trial batches be completed at least two weeks prior to actual grouting operations.
This time is necessary to conduct the trial batch, determine grout strength and strength gain, and conduct
an additional trial batch if the strength or strength gain does not satisfy the specification.

7.4.1.4.2 Weather Restrictions

Grouting should be conducted under the same limitations as casting concrete. Grouting during rainy
weather may not only add water to grout mixes but may also rush workers as they conduct grouting
operations. To prevent poor durability or other undesirable properties, manufacturer’s recommendations
for cold weather limitations should be followed. In addition, cold and warm weather practices may be
necessary for flowability.

7.4.1.4.3 Admixtures
Prepackaged grouts are proprietary mixes, and thus no additives should be used in the grout. Additives
may adversely affect grout properties and void manufacturer warranties.

7.4.1.5 Acceptance
Any grout conforming to the following should be acceptable for use:
1. Satisfies all of the parameters of the grout specification of Table 7.1
2. Achieves an acceptable grout flow in field conditions during the trial batch immediately after
mixing and at the pot life
3. Attains compressive strength and compressive strength gain based on grout cube tests using trial
batch grout
4. Possesses a working time suitable for connection grouting
5. Performs reliably in trial grouting operation
6. Possesses other properties, including durability, required for a project-specific application

7.4.2 Formwork
To ensure successful grouting, the bedding layer must be properly formed. As shown in Chapter 5,
flexible fiberglass forms are readily available and may be tightly wrapped around and bolted on round
columns. Wood may be used to form around the bedding of square or rectangular piles or columns. Care
should be exercised to ensure forms are tight and properly sealed. Presoaking is a vital step to ensure
forms are sealed. Custom-made forms may be more reliable in sealing rectangular and square sections.
Formwork should accommodate air vent tubes or holes. Supplementary vents may be formed into the
bent cap.

317
Page App C-49 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
7.4.3 Presoaking
Connections should be presoaked with water for a minimum of two hours prior to grouting. Presoaking
connections should be conducted for two reasons: 1) to verify tightness of forms at the bedding layer, and
2) to minimize loss of moisture from the grout into the surrounding concrete that can lead to grout
shrinkage. Verification of form tightness is particularly critical to successful connection grouting. An
overnight or 24-hour presoaking of the connection is preferable. Residual water left in the connection
after presoaking must be drained prior to grouting. This may be accomplished with auxiliary water ports
provided at the bottom of the bedding layer formwork or by vacuuming.

7.4.4 Pre-Grouting Meeting

Because of the difficulty in correcting field problems after grouting, special care and oversight should be
exercised prior to and during initial grouting operations. An on-site pre-grouting meeting between the
contractor and a TxDOT representative should be conducted just prior to actual grouting operations to
review the details of the grouting procedure and ensure lessons learned during the trial batch are
incorporated. In addition, the TxDOT representative should be available for consultation during initial
grouting operations and periodically thereafter. All grouting operations should be observed by a TxDOT
representative for compliance with the Precast Bent Cap Placement Plan.

7.4.5 Grouting Methods

Grout should be deposited in the connection in such a way that all voids are completely filled. Both
gravity-flow and pressure grouting may achieve this objective. As mentioned in Chapter 2, gravity-flow
grouting involves simpler operations overall and may be less expensive. However, additional effort may
be required to ensure connection voids are completely filled. Grouting using a low pressure pump
requires a higher level of skilled labor in the field, but would likely result in a connection free of voids
and can expedite grouting operations, especially on large projects. Both approaches can be economical,
depending on specific project constraints.
This section discusses gravity-flow grouting, which was used in Phases 1 through 3. Gravity-flow
grouting should be conducted using either a bucket or tremie tube.

7.4.5.1 Bucket Approach

Placement of grout with a bucket is a viable alternative for grout pocket connections, which use relatively
large openings at the cap top. As discussed in Chapters 4 and 5, five-gallon buckets are recommended for
placement. After mixing the grout, buckets are filled and lifted to the cap top. The grout is poured into
the pocket in lifts and tamped after each lift. A flat object such as a shovel or plywood can be used to
help direct grout into the pocket with minimal agitation of the grout or air entrapment. Any grout
sediments remaining at the bottom of the bucket should be removed and placed into the pocket prior to
tamping.

7.4.5.2 Tremie Tube

Tremie-tube grouting should be used for grouted vertical duct and bolted connections, and may also be
used for grout pocket connections. One of three variations may be used: 1) continuous-flow, 2) modified,
and 3) decanting. Continuous-flow tremie-tube grouting should be conducted by lowering a flexible tube
to the bottom of the bedding layer and filling the connection from the bottom upward with a continuous
flow of grout. With this approach, it is crucial that grout fill the tube continuously to avoid entrapping air
in the connection. This requires that a sufficient amount of grout be mixed prior to grouting and that the
funnel connected to the tube have adequate capacity. A pinch valve may be used to stop the flow during
grouting. This allows for refilling the funnel and tamping the voids. The tube should remain within the
grout, but may be gradually withdrawn as the level of grout rises in the ducts or pockets. This approach
should be used when possible, as it will likely prevent air entrapment.

318
Page App C-50 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
The modified tremie tube and decanting approaches do not require a continuous flow of grout. The
modified tremie tube approach should be used in cases where the tube cannot extend to the bottom of a
connection due to small clearances or other reasons. The tremie tube should always be kept above the top
of the grout, and the tube should direct the flow of grout against either a connector, sidewall, or duct. The
decanting approach should be conducted by pouring grout against connectors to direct the flow to the
bottom of the connection. This limits grout agitation and helps prevent air entrapment. Voids should be
tamped several times during grouting.

7.4.5.3 Pressure Grouting

Pressure grouting involves pumping grout into connections under low pressure. This approach may be
used for all connection types, and is required for grouted sleeve couplers. The trial batch and
manufacturer’s guidelines should be used to establish the pressure for grouting. To prevent entrapped air,
grout should not be placed at too high a rate. Voids may be lightly tamped.

7.4.5.4 Air Venting, Plan Sheets, Grout Handling

7.4.5.4.1 Air Venting
Air should be vented at the bedding layer using a minimum of four vent tubes or holes, distributed
uniformly around the perimeter of the column or pile formwork. Vent tubes or holes should be located at
the top of the bedding layer. When gravity flow grouting is used, multiple grout pockets or vertical ducts
should be grouted from a single pocket or from a corner duct. Vents should be plugged sequentially when
a steady stream of grout flow out without air. For connections with ducts or pockets, grout will
eventually flow up the ducts or pockets. After the grout level in the pocket or ducts rises near the cap top,
a tremie tube should be used to top off the openings.

7.4.5.4.2 Plan Sheets

It is highly recommended that plan sheets include a step-by-step list of procedures to be followed during
grouting operations. This is considered a key to successful grouting operations. The contractor involved
in Phase 3 construction strongly felt that this will help ensure grouting procedures are properly conducted.

7.4.5.4.3 Grout Handling

Precautions should be taken to minimize air entrapment when pouring grout from the mixer into
dispensers and when grouting connections.

7.5 OTHER ITEMS

Additional items related to the precast connection specification are discussed in this section, including
recommended tolerances, grout sampling for test cubes, grout curing, post-grouting inspection, and
verification of connector anchorage in columns and piles.

7.5.1 Recommended Tolerances

As discussed in Chapter 6, horizontal tolerances for grout pocket connections should be +/-1 in. in the
longitudinal direction and +/-2 in. in the transverse direction. Grouted vertical duct and bolted
connections using ducts should provide for a horizontal tolerance of +/-1 in. in both directions. If
possible, however, the engineer should size pockets and ducts to provide tolerances of at least +/-1.5 in. in
both directions. These tolerances must account for combined tolerances associated with placement of
connectors in piles or columns and fabrication and placement of pockets and ducts in the bent cap.
Vertical tolerances should be +/-1 in.

319
Page App C-51 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
When specifying connections using grouted sleeve couplers, the engineer should verify the available
horizontal and vertical tolerances provided by a particular coupler. Different tolerances are available for
different manufacturers and for couplers housing different bar sizes. In determining the suitability of such
a connection, the engineer should ensure that available tolerances are compatible with tolerances of
+/-1/8 in. in the horizontal direction and +/-3/8 in. in the vertical direction for placement of the coupler
within the bent cap.
To ensure adequate clearances are provided, ducts should be cast in the bent cap in such a way that a
vertical orientation is achieved after setting of the bent cap. This must be carefully considered during
bent cap fabrication, and may be especially critical when tight tolerances are necessary such as for
grouted sleeve couplers. Cross slope can be achieved by use of variable depth pedestals.

7.5.2 Grout Sampling for Test Cubes

During grouting operations, a TxDOT representative should witness the flow cone test and preparation of
a minimum of six grout cubes for each batch of grout. A commercial testing laboratory approved by a
TxDOT representative should test the grout cube specimens. To verify grout strength, cubes should be
tested at 1 day, 3 days, and for approval of beam setting and final strength.
For cases in which inadequate strength is indicated, additional grout cubes should be tested and the
average strength calculated. The engineer should determine the course of action in the event of
inadequate strength, including additional grout cube testing, a review of structural calculations and
durability provisions, and grout removal and re-grouting of the connection.

7.5.3 Grout Curing

All exposed grout surfaces should be cured in accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations. This
will typically involve covering exposed grout with clean wet rags and maintaining moisture for a
minimum of 6 hours, followed by the application of an approved membrane curing compound.

7.5.4 Post-Grouting Inspection

After grout curing and form removal, all exposed grout surfaces at the top and sides of the cap and at the
bedding layer should be carefully examined. If voids appear at any surface, external sealants should be
applied to prevent a moisture path into the connection. In extreme cases, epoxy injection or other
measures may be recommended by the engineer. In addition, external sealants should be applied to all
surfaces for which enhanced durability is required.

7.5.5 Verification of Anchorage

For specific projects, the engineer may require that a pullout test be conducted to verify the adequacy of
connector installation in columns, drilled shafts or piles. The connector should be loaded to less than the
yield force to limit potential damage. The number of connectors to be tested is left to the engineer’s
discretion. The minimum force required to demonstrate adequacy of connector installation should be
shown in the plans. Adequate anchorage should be assumed when an applied load equal to 85% of the
specified yield strength of the connector is applied without slippage or pullout of the connector.

320
Page App C-52 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
XXXX Specifications

SPECIAL SPECIFICATION

ITEM XXXX

PRECAST CONNECTIONS

XXXX.1. Description. This item shall govern for connection of precast concrete bent caps to cast-in-
place columns, drilled shafts and prestressed concrete piles.

XXXX.2. Materials. All materials shall conform to the pertinent requirements of the following Items
except as otherwise required herein:

Item 420, “Concrete Structures”

Item 421, “Portland Cement Concrete”
Item 425, “Prestressed Concrete Structural Members
Item 435, “Elastomeric Materials”
Item 440, “Reinforcing Steel”
Item 442, “Metal for Structures”
Item 447, “Structural Bolting”
Item 449, “Anchor Bolts”

(1) Hydraulic Cement Grout (Non-Shrink)

All grout for precast connections shall consist of prepackaged, cementitious, non-shrink grout in
accordance with ASTM C-1107 and the additional performance requirements listed in Table 1, including
mechanical properties, compatibility, constructability, and durability. Table 1 requirements shall govern
over ASTM C-1107 requirements. Grout using metallic formulations will not be allowed. Grout shall be
free of chlorides. No additives shall be added to prepackaged grout.

(2) Connection Hardware

All connection hardware, connectors, and ducts shall be in accordance with the requirements shown in the
plans.

XXXX.3. Contractor Submittals. At least one month prior to the start of precast bent cap placement,
the Contractor shall submit to the Engineer a Precast Bent Cap Placement Plan. Caps shall not be set

333
Page App C-53 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
until the Engineer has approved all required submittals. At a minimum, the plan shall contain the
following items:

a) Step-by-step description of bent cap placement for each bent, including proposed method to
form the connection and ensure grout is properly consolidated in the connection and bedding
layer.

b) Method and description of hardware used to hold bent cap in position prior to connection
grouting. Hardware may consist of plastic shims, steel shims, friction collars, shoring or other
support systems. Total shim area for each connection shall not exceed 10% of the cross sectional
area of the column, drilled shaft or pile. Individual shims shall be limited to a ratio of length to
width of 2:1. Hardware submittal shall consist of product information for plastic shims and
friction collars, drawings and material description for steel shims, and shop drawings for shoring
if used.

c) Method of installing connectors. Manufacturer’s literature for connector hardware and

adhesives used to install the connectors in the columns, drilled shafts or piles. Literature shall
include step-by-step installation instructions for adhesives used to install connectors and material
properties of the adhesive. Connector hardware shall conform to the type, coating, and
installation requirements shown in the plans. Submittals for connectors shall include design
calculations showing that the embedment depth exceeds that required to yield connectors.
Installation of anchors shall be in accordance with Item 420.11 (9) “Installation of Dowels and
Anchor Bolts”.

d) Manufacturer’s product information for two candidate grouts, to include a description of the
performance characteristics as specified in Table 1, mixing requirements, working time, curing
requirements, and other information related to grouting of precast connections utilizing ducts or
grout pockets.

e) Other required submittals shown on the plans or requested by the Engineer relating to
successful installation of precast bent caps and associated hardware.

XXXX.4. Construction Methods.

(1) General.
The Contractor shall follow the Precast Bent Cap Placement Plan, including all manufacturer’s
recommendations for anchorage installation and grouting operations. At the request of the Engineer, a
pre-grouting meeting shall be held to review grouting procedures.

When grout pocket connections are used, tolerance for placement of columns, drilled shafts and piles
shall be +/-1 in. in the longitudinal direction and +/-2 in. in the transverse direction. Horizontal tolerances
shall be taken with respect to the centerline of the bridge. When connectors are embedded in ducts,
tolerance for placement of columns, drilled shafts and piles shall be +/-1 in. Size, type, location and
orientation of ducts to account for cap slope shall be as shown in the plans. When connectors are installed
in preexisting columns, drilled shafts or piles, the tolerance for connector placement shall be +/-1/4 in.
with respect to plan location. All connectors shall be installed plumb. Vertical tolerance for cap
placement shall be +/-1 inch. Tolerances for grouted sleeve couplers, if used, shall be as shown in the
plans. Out-of-tolerance substructure elements shall be subject to structural review by the Engineer.

334
Page App C-54 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
All form release agents and curing membranes shall be completely removed from areas of the cap that
will be in contact with bearing seat and connection grout.

(2) Cap Placement.

The Contractor is solely responsible for insuring the stability of the bent cap prior to and during grouting
operations.

All grades, dimensions and elevations shall be verified and/or determined before the bent cap is placed.
The contractor shall verify proper alignment between the columns, drilled shafts or piles, including
connectors, grout pockets, post-tensioning ducts, and other connection hardware cast into the bent cap.
The precast cap may be set and used as a template for drilling anchorage holes at the Contractor’s option.

All loose material, dirt and foreign matter shall be removed from the tops of columns, drilled shafts or
piles before the cap is set.

(3) Anchorage.
A pullout test shall be used to verify the adequacy of the grout or adhesives used to anchor connectors
into columns, drilled shafts or piles. The minimum force required to demonstrate adequacy of anchor
installation shall be 85% of the nominal force required to yield the connector.

(4) Grouting of Connections.

Grout shall be used in strict accordance with manufacturer’s recommendations.

Admixtures, including retarders, shall not be added to grout, but the temperature of mixing water may be
adjusted or ice may be added to increase working time and pot life.

Addition of water to previously mixed grout or remixing of grout shall not be permitted. Water exceeding
manufacturer’s recommendations shall not be added to the grout to increase flowability.
(a) Trial Batch At least two weeks prior to grouting of connections, a trial batch of grout shall be
prepared to demonstrate grout properties and adequacy of equipment and to familiarize job site personnel
with grouting procedures.

A batch of grout is the amount of grout sufficient to complete an entire connection or number of
connections and is limited to the amount of grout that can be placed within the pot life determined in the
trial batch. Partial batches will not be allowed and shall be discarded. For continuous placement using a
grout pump, a batch shall be defined as one connection or one bent cap.

The Contractor shall establish grout flowability by measuring efflux (flow) time of with a standard flow
cone according to the Corps of Engineers Flow Cone Method, CRD-C 611 and ASTM C 939.

Test flow shall be determined immediately after mixing and at the expected working time to establish pot
life. The ambient temperature and mixing water temperature at the time of trial batch mixing shall be the
same as that expected at the time of grout placement. The Contractor shall establish that the grout flow
time satisfies the limits prescribed in Table 1.

335
Page App C-55 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
Observation of segregation or large clumps of grout in the final trial batch shall be cause for rejection of
the proposed brand of grout. Samples used for testing shall be taken from the middle of the batch.

One set of six (6) grout cubes shall be prepared as specified under Section 4 (c), Grout Testing, to verify
the compressive strengths shown in Table 1.

The Contractor shall validate the proposed grout placement technique by using the trial batch grout and
grout equipment in a sample grouting operation similar to the proposed connection grouting. Adequacy
of mixer, pump, tremie tubes, funnels, buckets, and vent tubes shall be established. The contractor shall
demonstrate that the equipment provided for grouting is adequate for mixing the grout and grouting the
connection within the pot life of the batch and does not introduce air into the grout or connection. A
square mesh with an opening no larger than 0.5 in. shall be used to filter out potential clumps when
transferring grout from the mixer to buckets.

(b) Grout Placement

Tremie tubes shall be small enough to enable grout to be placed between the connectors and corrugated
ducts. Funnels shall be large enough to keep the tremie tube full at all times. The tremie tube shall be
equipped with a pinch valve to stop flow in the event that grouting is interrupted.

All equipment necessary to properly perform grouting operations shall be present before actual grouting
operations begin. All grouting operations shall be performed in the presence of the Engineer in
accordance with the Precast Bent Cap Placement Plan. Grouting operations shall be performed under the
same weather limitations as cast-in-place concrete and as required by the manufacturer. Grout pumping
shall be required for connections that cannot be completed using buckets within the pot life established
for the grout during the trial batch.

Forms shall be drawn tight against the existing concrete and sealed water tight to avoid grout loss or
offsets at the joint. The connection shall be presoaked with water for a minimum of two hours prior to
grouting. After presoaking, the connection shall be drained of all water just prior to placement of grout.

Forms for the closure pour between the cap and column shall be adequately vented to allow air to escape
during grouting. Vent tubes shall have a minimum ½-in. inner diameter and shall be flush with the top of
the bedding layer. Vents shall not be plugged until a steady stream of grout flows out.

Grout shall be deposited such that all voids are completely filled. Grout shall be consolidated at intervals
during placement operations for all connection types. Vibrators shall not be used. All connections shall
be grouted in a manner that deposits grout from the bedding layer or bottom of the connection upward.
Grout shall be placed through connection ducts and/or grout ports located at the top or side of the precast
cap. When grout pocket connections are used, grout may also be deposited against the side of the pocket.
When insufficient pressure is available to completely fill the duct from the bottom up, the final portion of
grout may be placed from the cap top.

The Contractor shall validate the proposed grout placement technique by using the trial batch grout and
grout equipment in a simple grouting operation. Adequacy of tremie tubes, funnels, buckets, and vent
tubes shall be established.

All equipment necessary to properly perform grouting operations shall be present before actual grouting
operations begin. All grouting operations shall be performed in the presence of the Engineer in
accordance with the Precast Bent Cap Placement Plan.

336
Page App C-56 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
Forms shall be drawn tight against the existing concrete to avoid grout loss or offsets at the joint. All
previously hardened concrete surfaces that will be in contact with the grout shall be pre-watered to a
surface-saturated moist condition when the grout is placed. Drain ports or holes shall be provided to
allow residual water from prewatering to drain prior to grouting. Forms for the closure pour between the
cap and column shall be adequately vented to allow air to escape during grouting.

Grout shall be deposited such that all voids are completely filled. Grout shall be consolidated at intervals
during placement operations for all connection types. All connections shall be grouted in a manner that
deposits the grout from the bedding layer or bottom of connection upward. Grout shall be placed through
connection ducts and/or grout ports located at the top or side of the precast cap. When insufficient
pressure is available to completely fill the duct from the bottom up, the final portion of grout may be
placed from the cap top. In such cases, care shall be taken to prevent introducing air into the previously
placed grout.

Care shall be taken to prevent introducing air into previously placed grout by monitoring tremie tube
placement, grout flow, and rate of pour.

All exposed grout surfaces shall be cured in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.

(c) Grout Testing. The compressive strength of the grout for “Beam Setting Strength” and “Final
Strength” shall be determined using grout cubes prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM C-109.
The contractor will prepare a minimum of six (6) cubes per batch. A Commercial Testing Laboratory
approved by the Engineer shall test the specimens for “Beam Setting Strength” and “Final Strength.”
Grout failing to meet the minimum required compressive strength may be cause for rejection of the
connection, grout removal, and re-grouting of the connection by means approved by the Engineer.

(5) Beam Placement.

Bearing seat build-ups, when required, shall be placed in accordance with Item 420.18. The top surface
of the precast cap anchorage shall be finished in accordance with Item 420.18 or waterproofed as shown
in the plans. Lifting loops shall be burned off 1 in. below the surface of surrounding concrete and patched
using anchorage grout, bearing seat buildup grout or other material approved by the Engineer.

Beams shall not be set until the connection grout has reached a compressive strength equal to the “Beam
Setting Strength” shown on the plans. Final acceptance of the connection shall be after the grout has
reached the “Final Strength” shown in the plans and after the connection has been waterproofed, if
required.

XXXX.5. Measurement. Precast connections of the type specified shall be measured by each
precast connection.

XXXX.6. Payment. The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item and
measured as provided under “Measurement” shall be paid for at the unit price bid for each precast
connection of the type specified. This price shall be full compensation for furnishing hardware to support
the bent cap prior to grouting; for installation of the precast connection anchorage devices; for furnishing
and mixing grout; for placing, finishing and curing the grout; waterproofing the connection; and for all
labor, tools, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.

337
Page App C-57 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 Table 1: Grout Performance Specification

Property Values

Mechanical Age Compressive strength (psi)

Compressive strength 1 day 2500
(ASTM C-109, 2” cubes) 3 days 4000
7 days 5000
28 days 5,800 and
1.25(f'ccap + 1000)

Compatibility
Expansion requirements Grade B or Cexpansion per ASTM C 1107
(ASTM C 827 & ASTM C 1090)

Modulus of elasticity 3.0-5.0×106 psi

(ASTM C-469)

Coefficient of thermal expansion 3.0-10.0×10-6/deg F

(ASTM C-531)
Constructability
Flowability fluid consistency efflux time: 20-30 seconds
(ASTM C-939;
CRD-C 611 Flow Cone)
Set Time (ASTM C-191)
Initial 3-5 hrs
Final 5-8 hrs
Durability
Freeze Thaw (ASTM C-666) 300 cycles, RDF 90%
Sulfate Resistance (ASTM C-1012) expansion at 26 weeks < 0.1%

338
Page App C-58 Appendix C: Sample Construction Specifications
 Appendix D: Case Studies
The following pages contain brief cast studies of prefabricated bridge projects. The first
three are actual projects. The third is a hypothetical bridge project that demonstrates the
use of this document.

Case Title Pages

Study
Number

1 New Hampshire DOT D-3

Mill Street over the Lamprey River
Epping, New Hampshire

2 Texas DOT D-9

State Highway 36 over Lake Belton
Belton, Texas

3 Texas DOT D-15

Short Span Local Bridges in Texas

4 Hypothetical Bridge Replacement Project using All D-21

Prefabricated Components
Details taken from this document

Page App D-1 Appendix D: Case Studies

Page App D-2 Appendix D: Case Studies
 Case Study 1:
Mill Street Bridge over the Lamprey River
Epping, New Hampshire
Introduction:
The New Hampshire Department of Transportation has been a lead state in the use of
high performance concrete for bridges. To further extend the capabilities of high
performance concrete, the state undertook the development of details for an all precast
concrete bridge. The intent was to expedite construction using prefabricated
components with simple yet durable connections.

A trial demonstration project was selected in the Town of Epping, New Hampshire. The
project scope included the removal of two short span bridges that span spilt channels of
the Lamprey River and combine them into one single span bridge that would span both
channels. The project site was chosen for the demonstration project because there was
a short detour available that would allow for full closure of the roadway.

Project Site:
The bridge is located in the Town of Epping New Hampshire. Epping is typical of many
towns in New England that are home to short span bridges that are often over 100 years
old. The existing river crossing consisted of two bridges that carried Mill Street over two
channels of the Lamprey River. The site also included a historic mill dam that needed to
be kept in place in order to minimize changes to the river and to satisfy historic
preservation criteria at the site. The new bridge was designed to span both channels
and the dam. The resulting span length is 115 feet. The alignment of the road is
straight and there is an intersection just beyond the south end of the bridge.

Project Approach:
The New Hampshire DOT was interested in developing a rapid bridge replacement
system for use on state highway projects. The Epping site was chosen as a
demonstration project for several reasons. There was a reasonable detour around the
site; therefore a temporary bridge could be avoided. The site had low traffic volume,
therefore if problems arose on this demonstration project, there would not be significant
risk associated with not completing the project on schedule.

The intent was to develop a bridge design that could be constructed in less than 2 weeks
using all precast concrete elements. In order to simplify the contracting for this trial
project, the existing bridge removal and excavation were excluded from the 2 week
timeframe. This was done because there was bedrock at the site; which could
complicate the site preparation work and lead to contracting problems with unknown
foundation conditions. On future accelerated construction projects, the state would
include the site preparation within the accelerated construction timeframe.

Design Details:
A decision was made in the early design phase of the project to build a bridge with
traditional abutments and walls that used connections that have been used in the past
on other structures. By using traditional foundations, the details could easily be
transferred to other accelerated construction projects.

Page App D-3 Appendix D: Case Studies

 The state wanted to use a proven system of connecting precast elements whose
behavior is known. The system chosen was taken from the vertical construction
industries (parking garages, stadiums, and buildings). The connections are made using
grouted reinforcing splice couplers. The use of these connectors allowed for a simplified
emulation design procedure for the substructure elements (see Section 1.4.2 for more
information on these connectors and emulation design).

Substructure:
The substructure is a simple cantilever abutment and cantilever wingwall system
that is supported on reinforced concrete spread footings. The site constraints,
hydraulics, and maximum beam span dictated that the abutments be full height
abutments with the base located at the edge of the river channel. The design of
the connections emulated a typical cast-in-place concrete construction joint at the
base of the wall element, except the lap splices were replaced with the grouted
reinforcing splice couplers. All other aspects of the design were based on
conventional reinforced concrete methods.

One of the most unique aspects of this project was the use of precast concrete
footing elements. At the time of the design, the state was not aware of any other
bridge projects that had used precast concrete footings; therefore new details
had to be developed. Conventional footings are designed using one-way slab
action; which means that the transverse connection between footing elements
need not transmit moment. Instead, a simple grouted shear connection was
used that would transfer shear between the footing elements in case there was
minor differential settlement across the length of the wall section.

Proper seating of the footings over the substrate was a concern. In order to
provide uniform bearing, a grouted void was used. The footings were also cast
with leveling bolts that allowed for adjustment of grade in the field. The intent
was to support the footings on the leveling bolts until the grout could be placed
under the footings. Grout placement was done through pipe blockouts in the
footing. A flowable grout was placed from the center and allowed to flow to the
edges of the footings where it was contained with a simple dam system. The
strength and curing of the grout did not hinder the continuation of the
construction because the bearing pressures on the grout are very low during
construction. These pressures are even very low after the bridge is in service.
Typical bearing pressures on spread footings are in the range of 50 pounds per
square inch; therefore a high strength grout is not needed under the footings.

The wall stems were placed in a shallow trough cast in the top of the footing to
facilitate grouting and to improve shear resistance in the connection. This trough
could have been eliminated by checking the shear resistance of the connection
using the shear friction provisions in AASHTO; however the state preferred to
use the trough to facilitate the grouting and to provide extra shear resistance.

The vertical joints between wall panels were detailed with simple grouted shear
keys that are similar to a typical contraction joint in New Hampshire standards for
reinforced concrete cantilever walls. The original contract plans had a layout of
both horizontal and vertical joints in the wall stems. The layout was shown as
schematic, and the contractor was allowed to modify the joint layout within
certain parameters that were defined on the contract documents. The contractor

Page App D-4 Appendix D: Case Studies

 chose to use only one horizontal joint at the wall to footing interface and run the
wall elements full height. This approach is recommended because it limits the
wall construction to only one moment connection over the entire height.
Additional horizontal joints would require the use of more grouted reinforcing
splice couplers, which would lead to higher costs.

All other connections including the abutment cheekwalls were made using the
grouted reinforcing splice couplers or grouted shear keys.

Superstructure:
The New Hampshire DOT has been using precast prestressed adjacent box
beam bridges for many years. These beams allow for a simple superstructure
that can be built very quickly because there is no need for a reinforced concrete
deck. Typical details in the northeast historically have not included a concrete
over-pour on these beams. The system is overlaid with bituminous pavement
after the installation of a membrane waterproofing system.

The connection between beams is made using a grouted shear key combined
with an unbonded lateral post-tensioning tie. The lateral ties used in the
northeast for the last ten years are monostrand post tensioning system that is
commonly used in post tensioned parking garage structures. Each strand is
delivered to the job site in a grease filled sheath that is run through a transverse
void in the beams. The ends are anchored to an epoxy coated anchor plate and
sealed with a grease filled cap. This unbonded system does not use grouted
ducts; therefore the installation can be completed very quickly. A typical
installation of all lateral ties in a span is less than 1 hour.

To expedite construction of the railings, the state detailed a reinforced concrete

curb that was installed at the precast plant. This curb included anchor bolts for a
standard New Hampshire aluminum rail system that was installed after erection
of the beams.

Page App D-5 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Construction:
The contractor was given two weeks to complete the bridge installation after the existing
bridges were removed and the excavation was completed. The existence of bedrock
required that the bottom be over excavated so that the precast footings would fit within
the excavation. A thin layer of low-density concrete fill was placed to facilitate the
placement of the footings on the uneven bedrock (a layer of structural granular fill could
have been used also). The timeline for construction is shown in Figure CS1-1:

C ons truc tion Item R u n n in g Tim e

D a y On e D a y Tw o D a y Th re e D a y Fo u r D a y Five D a y S ix D a y S e ve n D a y E ig h t

Footing Ins tallation

A butm ent s tem s

and wall s tem s

B ac k filling of A butm ent

and walls

S upers truc ture

Ins tallation

W aterproofing, P aving
and approac hes

Figure CS1-1: Construction Timeline

The contractor was given options for backfilling the walls and abutments that included
the use of flowable fill or standard compacted gravel fill. Flowable fill is a mixture of
sand, water, and a small amount of cement that has the consistency of flowable
concrete. The contractor chose the compacted gravel option due to difficulties with
containing the flowable fill during placement. The area for backfill was relatively small
and was accomplished with small vibratory compaction equipment.

Lessoned Learned:
The construction of the Mill Street Bridge was a great success. The construction time of
eight days was faster than the specified 14 day construction window. Construction costs
for the foundations were higher than conventional construction; however when factoring
in the elimination of a temporary bridge crossing, the overall cost of the project was only
8% higher than conventional construction.

The following items contain concepts that should be followed on future projects using
these methods and lessons learned on the Mill Street Bridge:
1. The tolerances on the placement of the grouted reinforcing splice couplers
are critical, but not unattainable. The couplers have some tolerance and it is
possible to oversize the couplers by two bar sizes to give even larger
tolerances. For instance, a number 11 coupler can be used with a number 9
bar. The use of narrower wall elements will also help to alleviate fit-up
problems with the couplers. This requires fewer couplers per piece, which
which less chance for dimensional problems.
2. Specifications should indicate that the tolerable distance to each coupler be
measured from a common working point as opposed to center-to-center

Page App D-6 Appendix D: Case Studies

 spacing. This way there will be no build up of placement tolerances in the
form.
3. Simple geometric layouts of abutments and walls are preferred over complex
geometry. The Mill Street Bridge was designed with walls that were either 0
degrees or 90 degrees when compared to the abutment wall face. It is
possible to build a precast substructure with complex geometry; however
more care may need to be taken during fabrication. It may be desirable to
have the structure dry fit in the shop prior to shipment to ensure the
geometries are correct.
4. The shape of pieces should be kept simple, so that basic flat slab precasting
can be used.
5. Allowing the contractor to adjust the size and number of pieces is beneficial
so that the contractor can bid the project based on the available equipment.
6. Maximum element dimensions and weights need to be specified so that
shipping can be made without special permits.
7. Grouting of vertical joints in wall elements was difficult. The contractor tried
to use backer rods; however the rods pushed out during grouting. More
substantial forms are required for the vertical joints. Designer should add
notes to the plans warning the contractor of the pressure head of the grout.
8. The joint widths for the vertical wall elements were detailed as 1” wide, which
made grout installation difficult. On future projects, these joints should be
detailed as 1 ½” wide.
9. Some states do not use shear keys between wall sections for cantilever
walls. On future projects, the state will used non-keyed joints combined with
expanding foam joint filler that can be injected into the gap between the wall
elements after erection.
10. The design of the footing leveling bolts should be based on the full weight of
the footing element. It is inevitable that the footing will rest on just two of the
bolts, which makes it difficult to adjust. One method of overcoming this is to
adjust the elevation by turning the leveling bolts prior to release of the footing
element from the crane. Greasing the bolts also improves this operation.
11. The grouting of the reinforcing bar couplers went very fast (approximately 150
sleeves per hour). Cure time prior to backfilling is approximately 12 to 16
hours. It is recommended that the contractor’s workers be trained by the
manufacturer prior to installation.

Page App D-7 Appendix D: Case Studies

Page App D-8 Appendix D: Case Studies
 Case Study 2:
State Highway 36 over Lake Belton
Belton, Texas
Introduction:
The Texas Department of Transportation
undertook a project to replace an aging bridge
that carries State Route 36 over Lake Belton
in Belton, Texas. The existing bridge is multi-
span steel stinger bridge that is approximately
3700 feet long and is located approximately
35 feet above normal water levels. Figure
CS2-1 shows the existing bridge.

Figure CS2-1 Existing Bridge

The new bridge is a 32 span prestressed

concrete U-Beam bridge that is supported
on twin column reinforced concrete pier
bents with a hammerhead bent cap. The
proposed bridge is a twin span with two side
by side bridges that were nearly identical.
There are 62 pier bents on the project. The
superstructure is a standard precast
prestressed U bean that is used in Texas.
The beams support a standard 8” thick
reinforced concrete deck. Figure CS2-2 is a
computer rendering of the proposed
Figure CS2-2 Proposed Bridge structure.

Project Approach:
The existing bridge had a low strength rating; therefore the delivery of materials via the
existing bridge not possible. In order to facilitate construction, prefabricated pier bent caps
were proposed. The bent caps offer the following advantages when compared to
conventional cast-in-place construction.

1. The use of a repetitive shape was ideal for prefabrication, which saved time. By
using prefabricated elements, the state saved the time for setting the formwork,
placing concrete and curing. Installation proceeded at a rate of two caps per
week.
2. There is a cost savings by minimizing the amount of labor on site and by
reducing the overall project time.
3. The quality of the caps was far superior to conventional cast-in-place concrete.
High strength high quality concrete was specified that will be more durable than

Page App D-9 Appendix D: Case Studies

 conventional construction. Quality control in a precast plant typically exceeds the
quality that can be attained in the field.
4. Safety was improved by reducing the amount of man-hours of labor and
inspection personnel that need to be working on a high platform.
5. The repetition of the pier caps made it cost effective to build custom forms for the
bent cap shape. The cost of the forms was spread out among the 62 cap pieces
that needed to be cast. Since a custom form needed to be made, designers
chose to incorporate architectural details into the cap shape.

Project Site:
The bridge is located near Belton Texas. The bridge is very high above the normal water
line because the water surface elevation on Lake Belton can fluctuate as much as 40 feet.
There is barge access to most of the project site. The low load carrying capacity of the
existing bridge (13 tons) greatly limited the delivery of materials for the new bridge.
Concrete delivery had to be made via barges. Figure CS2-3 is a satellite photo of the project
site.

Figure CS2-3 Project Site

Project Approach:
The Texas Department of Transportation had completed several precast concrete bent cap
project prior to this project. They had also complete several large research project that
investigated the connection of the precast bent cap to concrete columns. The Connection
details that were studied included grouted voids and grouted post tensioning duct with mild
reinforcement dowels. Previous projects with grouted ducts had the ducts projecting to the
top of the pier cap. The Lake Belton project did not have this detail. Instead, all but two of
the ducts were capped in the core of the pier cap; thereby eliminating issues with exposure
of the ducts to the environment and also eliminating interference issues between the ducts
and the densely spaced reinforcement in the top of the pier cap. Grouting was done via
standard grout ports and vents. The connection is enhanced by the addition of spiral
reinforcement to help enhance the strength and service performance of the connection.

Page App D-10 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Design Details:
Figure CS2-4 shows an elevation view of a typical bent. The lower portion of the bent
consists of two 5 foot diameter drilled shafts. There is a tie beam located approximately 12
to 15 feet above normal water levels. The tie beam was used to make up for tolerances in
the drilled shaft locations. Constant height columns with reveals and column capitals were
then cast above the tie beam that were aesthetically pleasing and allowed for repetitive
formwork.

The bent caps were 39 ft long and 5.5 ft wide. The bottom soffit of the cantilevers has a 17
foot radius. The depth of the cantilevers varies from 3 feet to 5.5 feet. The cross slope of
the roadway was accomplished by varying height beam pedestals on top of the bent caps.

Figure CS2-4 Proposed Pier Bent

Figure CS2-5 shows the arrangement of the post tensioning ducts within the bent cap.
There were a total of 14 ducts in the connection. Most were used to anchor #11 reinforcing
bars that projected from the cast-in-place columns. Several were used for temporary
threadbar connections. In later stages of construction the use of the temporary threadbar
connections was waived because of the stability of the bent cap on the columns.

Grout tubes were used to deliver the grout to both the ducts and the interface gap between
the columns and the bent cap. Elevations and the gap between the cap and the column
were set by the installation of leveling shim packs (4 sets per column) that were placed prior
to setting the cap. A for was used to contain the grout at the top of the column. After
grouting (Figure CS2-6), the form was removed and replaced with dry pack grout (Figure
CS2-7). Mock-ups of the grouting area were made and tested prior to production in order to
ensure that the grout was filling all the voids.

Page App D-11 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS2-5 Grouted Reinforcement PT Duct Layout

The bent caps were fabricated off site at a precast fabrication plant. Trucking the elements
required the use of non-standard trailers due to the high weight. Once on site, the caps
were transferred to a work barge with a crane. Once in position, the crane lowered the bent
cap on top of the cast-in-place concrete columns.

Figure CS2-6 Grouted Placement

Page App D-12 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS2-7 Dry Pack Grouted Placement

Lessoned Learned:
The Lake Belton project was very successful. The construction of the bent cap was much
faster than conventional cast-in-place construction. The caps were installed at a rate of 2
per week. Construction costs were slightly higher than cast-in-place construction; however
the high quality concrete and improvement of worker safety made the cost increase
acceptable. The state anticipates that costs will decrease as contractors become familiar
with the process.

The following items contain concepts should be followed on future projects using these
methods and lessons learned on the Mill Street Bridge:
1. Since a non-conventional grouted post tensioning tube connection was used,
research was critical in order to determine the behavior of the connection. The
research proved that the connection was viable and low cost. This connection is not
recommended for high seismic zones; however there is on-going research in
California to enhance this connection type for use in high seismic areas.
2. The tolerances on the vertical reinforcing projecting from the cast-in-place columns
was set at ½” This was found to be more than adequate to make the connection.
3. The use of mock-ups for grouting procedures was a benefit for both the contractor
and the inspection personnel.
4. The quality of the concrete used in the precast bent caps far exceeded the quality of
normal cast-in-place concrete. This was due to the use of better concrete and better
curing methods in the fabrication plans.
5. Through the use of prefabrication on several projects, the state has concluded tha
prefabrication has several advantages over conventional construction:
a. Reduced traffic disruption
b. Increased work zone safety
c. Reduction in environmental impacts
d. Improved constructability
e. Increased quality
f. Lower life cycle costs
6. The state plans on developing new prefabrication concepts for future projects.

Page App D-13 Appendix D: Case Studies

Page App D-14 Appendix D: Case Studies
 Case Study 3:
Short-span Local Bridges in Texas
Introduction:
The Texas Department of Transportation has been developing standard designs for short-
span bridges in Texas. The state has numerous county bridges that are in need of
replacement. Prefabrication of replacement bridges is a large part of this initiative.

Several different types of prefabricated bridge elements have been developed for use on
this program. The intent is to minimize on-site casting and curing of concrete. A typical off-
system bridge construction contract duration in Texas is approximately 6 months. The goal
is to reduce this duration to one month or less.

Program Approach:
Local off-system bridges present a different set of constraints when compared to high
volume highway bridges. The fact that a bridge has low traffic volume does not mean that
prefabrication is not viable. Several factors can play into the need for prefabrication on local
bridges:
1. Detour lengths in rural area can be significant. The cost for detours or temporary
structures can be significant. The detours are also disruptive to local residents
and businesses.
2. Remote bridge location can make the delivery of cast-in-place concrete difficult.
The ability to precast concrete elements off site can lead to significant savings.
3. By using prefabricated butted beam elements, a bridge can be built without deck
forming and casting. The beams can be overlaid with asphalt pavement, thereby
reducing construction time and cost.
4. Prefabricated steel railings can be used on low volume roads, which eliminates
the need for cast concrete parapets.

Several different prefabricated bridge elements have been developed for local bridges in
Texas. The following are examples of these elements:

Precast concrete pier bent pile caps with steel piles:

Pile bents made with steel piles and
concrete caps can be a very cost
effective substructure for multi-span
bridges. The piles can be driven
quickly without significant disruption
to the river. Upon completion of the
driving operation, the piles are cut
off to the proper elevation. The bent
caps are made using precast
concrete elements with embedded
steel plates on the underside of the
cap. The connection between the
piles and the cap is made using Figure CS3-1 Steel Pile to Cap Connection
overhead fillet welds. Figure CS3-1
shows a typical pile to cap
connection.

Page App D-15 Appendix D: Case Studies

 The detailing of the bent cap is
rather simple; therefore it can be
cast near site or in a local
construction yard. The caps can
be cast on the ground using
standard concrete forms. Figure
CS3-2 shows a typical cap after
fabrication. Figure CS3-3 shows
the welding procedure.

Figure CS3-2 Pile Bent Cap Fabrication

Figure CS3-3 Pile to Cap Connection

Precast abutment caps are similar to

the pier bents. Abutment bent caps
can be constructed with backwalls and
integral “flying” wingwalls. Figure
CS3-4 shows a typical abutment bent
Figure CS3-4 Abutment Bent Installation
cap being installed.

Page App D-16 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Winged Slab and Double Tee Beams:
A family of winged slab and double tee beams has been developed for use in adjacent
beam superstructures. These beams are use instead of traditional butted slab and box
beam bridges due to leakage problems and joint failures. Figure CS3-5 shows a typical
cross section of a winged slab bridge. Figure CS3-6 shows a typical cross section of a
butted double tee bridge.

Figure CS3-5 Winged Slab Bridge Beams

Figure CS3-6 Butted Double Tee Bridge Beams

The beams are butted together and jointed using a welded rod and non-shrink grout. Upon
completion of the grouting, the slabs are given a 2 course surface treatment and then
covered with an asphalt overlay wearing surface. The bridge railings are then bolted directly
to the winged slab. Figure CS3-7 show the details of the welded plate connection. This
connection was studied in a Texas DOT Research Project Number 1856-2 to ensure that it
would provide a durable connection. The research showed that the welded plate spaced at
5 feet on center combined with a grouted shear connection between the welded plates
adequately provided load transfer to adjacent beams.

Page App D-17 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS3-7 Lateral Welded Plate Beam Connection Details

Conventional Butted Slab Beams:

Texas also uses butted slab beam bridges. These beams are connected by means of a
grouted shear key combined with lateral post tensioning. The lateral post tensioning
consists of a single ½” diameter prestressing strand in a grease filled sheath. The strands
are spaced a 5 foot intervals and stressed to 31,000 pounds after the grouted keys have
cured. Figure CS3-8 shows a typical cross section of a butted slab bridge. Figure CS3-9
shows typical post-tensioning details.

Figure CS3-8 Butted Slab Beam Bridge Beams

Page App D-18 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS3-9 Lateral Post-Tensioning Details

Flowable Fill Backfill:

Flowable fill is a mixture of sand water and fly
ash. The fly ash content is kept low, so that
the resulting material can be excavated in the
future with relative ease. The intent of flowable
fill is to provide a stable backfill material that
does not need compaction. It can be driven on
hours after placement. It has a final
compressive strength of approximately 150 psi.

Figure CS3-10 Placement of Flowable Fill

Lessoned Learned:
1. It is possible to build prefabricated bridges very quickly.
2. Precast pile caps welded to steel piles is a viable option for accelerated bridge
construction in Texas.
3. Transverse connections for butted beam systems have been researched and a
welded plate connector was developed. This connection can be used on various
types of butted beam bridges.
4. Flowable fill can be used to place backfill soils rapidly.

Page App D-19 Appendix D: Case Studies

Page App D-20 Appendix D: Case Studies
 Case Study 4:
Hypothetical Bridge Replacement Project
Using All Prefabricated Components
Based on Details in this Document
Introduction:
This case study is for a hypothetical bridge replacement project. The intent of this study
is to demonstrate the use of this manual and how details from several different sources
can be combined into an actual bridge project. The bridge chosen is a typical
expressway overpass. This example is for the development of a preliminary structure
type study using prefabricated components.

Project Site:
The bridge is located in a northern climate. It is exposed to snow and de-icing salts.
The bridge is located in a commercial/retail area. The bridge carries the local road over
an expressway. There are four lanes of traffic on the bridge (2 in each direction) and
four lanes beneath the bridge (2 in each direction). There are retail establishments near
the bridge that would be affected by any type of construction. Traffic volume is high on
both roadways. There is a detour available for the local road; however it is
approximately 2 miles long.

The structure is a three span bridge (simple spans). The structure type is a composite
deck supported by steel beams. The abutments are full height cantilever type and the
piers are conventional concrete multi-column bents. A sketch of the existing bridge is
shown in Figure CS4-1 on the following page.

The bridge structure has deteriorated to the point where replacement is the only option.
The bridge has the following deficiencies:
• Minimal under-clearance (14’-5”)
• The piers and abutment are deteriorated due to close proximity to roadway (salt
spray attack)
• The deck is severely deteriorated
• There are leaking deck joints at each pier and abutment
• The beams have peeling lead paint
• The beam ends are deteriorated due to deck joint leakage

Page App D-21 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS4-1: Existing Bridge

Project Approach:
The state DOT undertook a public involvement process and presented several options to
the local businesses. The primary concern of the businesses was the potential loss of
income from the construction project.

The designers investigated and presented two options.

Option 1: Conventional construction using multiple stages
Under this option, both roadways would remain open to traffic for the entire
duration of the project; however one lane of traffic would need to be taken out of
service in each direction in order to make room for the construction activities.
The bridge would need to be built in two stages, and it is estimated that
construction would take approximately 18 months (with a 3 month winter
shutdown).

Advantages:
The roadways will remain open to traffic at all times
Disadvantages:
Construction will take almost 2 years
Traffic will be congested during construction.

Option 2: Use prefabrication, close the road and accelerate construction

Page App D-22 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Under this option, the traffic on the bridge will be detoured around the site. The
entire bridge can then be built without traffic management on site. Virtually all
components will be prefabricated off site prior to roadway closure. The goal
would be to replace the bridge in 30 days.

Advantages:
The overall project can be greatly reduced
Quality can be improved by using plant produced concrete
Disadvantages:
The road will be closed for 30 days, which will impact the businesses.

During the public hearing, the business owners expressed that they would prefer to live
with a 30 day full closure as opposed to a protracted partial closure. This is not unusual.
Businesses often see a marked drop-off in customers if they are near a construction site.
Two years of a 20% reduction in business is much worse than 30 days of a more
significant reduction. Based on this, the design team opted for the second option with
the full closure and a detour.

Design Details:
Following the public involvement process, a formal type study was completed. The use
of prefabricated elements does not necessarily correspond to a significant change in the
structure type. It is possible to construct typical bridge structures with prefabricated
elements. In this case, the designer opted for the following design after the type study
was completed:
Structure Layout: 2 span continuous (no deck joint at the pier)
Place the pier in the center of the median between the existing piers
Raise the grade of the bridge 3 feet
Improve under-clearance and allow for deeper beams (longer spans)
Integral abutment design (no deck joints at the abutments)
Place the abutment on top of the slope to minimize the height of the
stems
Support the abutments on steel H-Piles
Use a typical multi-column concrete pier bent
Supported on spread footings
Use a continuous steel plate girder with a composite concrete deck
Unpainted weathering steel
Use a bituminous concrete wearing surface
Protect the deck with a waterproofing membrane
Use open galvanized steel railings (aesthetics)
Placed on top of a small curb section

The layout of the bridge is shown in Figure CS4-2. The new bridge offers significant
improvements over the existing bridge. The under clearance has been increased to 16’-
5”. All deck joints have been eliminated. By pushing the substructure elements away
from the roadway, there is an improvement in roadside safety and the potential for salt
spray attack is virtually eliminated.

Page App D-23 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS4-2: Proposed Bridge

Use of this Manual:

The design of this bridge is no different than a typical highway overpass. The goal is to
use connections that emulate traditional construction joints. The designers reviewed
chapter one of this manual to become familiar with the options for connection types and
the materials and tolerances that would be required. Following this, the designers
searched through the applicable sections in chapters 2,3 and 4 for details that could be
used on the structure type chosen.

Connection Types:
The designers chose the following connection types for this bridge:
Grouted Reinforcing Splice Couplers
These couplers are very versatile because they simply replace a
traditional reinforcing lap splice at a construction joint. They can be used
for the footing to column connection, and the column to cap connection as
well as other connections throughout the bridge. The design of the bridge
is also simplified since traditional reinforced concrete design methods can
be used.
Grouted Voids
Some of the potential connections on the bridge do not require large force
resistance. In this case a simple grouted void with a pin will suffice. An
example pf this is the connection of the approach slab to the abutment
shelf.

Page App D-24 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Cast-in-place Concrete Closure Pours
There are a few connections that may require a concrete closure pour.
This connection is normally limited to connections that require significant
tolerance adjustment. This connection is anticipated for the connection of
the superstructure to the substructure at the top of the integral abutment.

Schematic Pier Design:

The proposed pier design is a traditional multi-column concrete bent. In order to
accelerate construction, all precast elements will be used (including the footings). The
designer located details for this structure in chapter 4 of the manual (foundations) and
chapter 3 (substructures).

Section 4.1.1 includes information on the connection of precast concrete footings to the
subgrade soils. While this may not seem like a connection, the interface between the
footing and the soil must transfer significant forces. The connection chosen was
developed by the New Hampshire DOT (detail 4.1.1 A)

Section 3.1.4.1 includes information on the connection of precast concrete columns to

precast concrete footings. The selected connection is a conceptual detail developed by
the PCI Northeast Bridge Technical Committee. The detail is very similar to and
abutment detail that was successfully built in Epping, New Hampshire. This connection
is also used extensively in the building industry. The connection is made using grouted
reinforcing splice couplers.

Section 3.1.1.2 includes information on the connection of precast concrete columns to

precast concrete pier caps. The connection chosen has also been used by the states of
Florida and Georgia (detail 3.1.1.2 A). The connection is made using grouted reinforcing
splice couplers.

A double two column pier bent was chosen In order to simplify the connection of the pier
cap to the columns and to reduce the shipping weight of the pier cap elements. Figure
CS4-3 depicts a schematic exploded view rendering of the proposed pier.

Figure CS4-3: Proposed Pier

Page App D-25 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Schematic Abutment Design:
The proposed abutment is an integral abutment supported on steel H-piles. The majority
of this structure will be precast. The connection to the superstructure will be a cast-in-
place closure pour. The designer located details for this structure in chapter 3 of the
manual (substructures).

Section 3.2.3.1 includes information on the connection of abutment caps and steel piles.
The connection chosen was developed by the Maine DOT. Similar connections have
also been used in other states (detail 3.2.3.1 B).

Splices in the abutment wall are required in order to keep the shipping weights
reasonable. Flying wingwalls were also chosen for this design. A flying wingwall is a
short wingwall that is cantilevered off the rear or side of the integral abutment. Sections
3.2.3.3 and 3.2.4.1 cover these connections. It involves match casting the abutment
components and wingwall extensions. These details were also developed by Maine
DOT (details 3.2.3.3. A and 3.2.4.1.A).

The connection of the precast approach slab to the integral abutment is a simple grouted
void with a reinforcing bar pin. Section 3.2.4.2 includes information on approach slab
connections. The detail chosen was also developed by New Hampshire DOT based on
similar work on three Maine DOT projects (detail 3.2.4.2 A).

Figure CS4-4 depicts a schematic exploded view rendering of the proposed abutment.

Figure CS4-4: Proposed Integral Abutment

The connection of the integral abutment to the superstructure is one of the most
complicated connections on the bridge. There is a need for significant tolerance
adjustment at this connection (both vertically and horizontally). For this reason, a cast-in-
place concrete closure pour is proposed. The Bridge Technical Committee of the
Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Northeast Region has developed a detail
for this connection. A precast concrete backwall is connected to the abutment stems
using grouted reinforcing splice couplers. This backwall serves several purposes. First

Page App D-26 Appendix D: Case Studies

 is acts as a form for the closure pour. It also supports the approach slab. It also
provides the negative moment resistance for the superstructure connection. Section
2.5.2 covers this connection. The detail chosen is detail number 2.5.2 A. Figure CS4-5
depicts a schematic section of the connection.

Figure CS4-5: Schematic Superstructure to Substructure Connection

Schematic Precast Deck Design:

The proposed bridge deck is a full depth precast concrete system. Many states have
built full depth precast concrete decks with similar details. The system chosen is
prestressed in the transverse direction and post-tensioned in the longitudinal direction.
The majority of the deck will be precast. A small closure pour is required to
accommodate the roadway crown. The designers located details for this portion of the
structure in chapter 2 of the manual (superstructures).

Section 2.1.1.2 covers the connection of the deck to the steel girders. This detail has
been used in many different states. It consists of shear studs welded to the girder
through a pocket cast into the deck (detail 2.1.1.2 A). The pockets are grouted to make
the deck composite with the girders. Temporary support of the deck is required during

Page App D-27 Appendix D: Case Studies

 construction. There is also a need to provide grade adjustment during construction.
Detail 2.1.1.2 B is a detail that has been used many times in different states.
The connection of the individual deck panels is a transverse connection that is
perpendicular to the strength direction of the deck. The AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design
Specifications [1] include requirements for this connection. They include the need for
post-tensioning and grouted shear keys. Section 2.1.1.1 contains information on this
connection. The designers chose details 2.1.1.1 B and 2.1.1.1 C for this connection.

This bridge as with most bridges requires a crown at the centerline of the deck. It is very
difficult to cast a precast deck with a crown because the deck normally follows the
roadway crown. Most deck panels are cast on a flat form. In order to build a crowned
panel, custom forms would be required. Even if this was possible, it is impractical to
cast, handle and ship a deck slab element that is as wide as this bridge deck
(approximately 60 feet). For these reasons, the designers chose to use a small closure
pour at the roadway crown. This connection needs to develop the full strength of the
deck section. Section 2.1.1.1 has information on this connection. The designers chose
detail 2.1.1.1 D for this connection.

The connection of the curb to the deck is somewhat problematic. All curbs and railings
on federally funded project are required to be crash tested. There are very few crash
tested prefabricated parapets or curbs. For this reason, the designers chose to use a
cast-in-place concrete curb for this bridge. It should not effect the project schedule
because it can be cast at the same time as the roadway crown and integral abutment
connection.

Figure CS4-6 depicts the schematic deck design.

Figure CS4-6: Proposed Precast Concrete Deck

Page App D-28 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Figure CS4-7 depicts a partial view of the complete bridge structure.

Figure CS4-7: Partial View of the Proposed Bridge

Page App D-29 Appendix D: Case Studies

 Construction:
The goal of this project is to accelerate the construction of this bridge less than 30 days.
The timeline shown in Figure CS4-8 was developed based on actual projects around the
country and are therefore considered to be reasonable.
Task Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4

Demo Existing Bridge 5 Days

Install Substructrures 8 Days

Erect Beams 3 Days

Install Deck and PT 3 Days

Closure Pours 3 Days

Curb Pour 3 Days

Railings 3 Days

Paving 2 Days

Approach Roadway 17 Days

Clean-up 2 Days

Figure CS4-8: Construction Timeline

Notes on construction timeline:

1. Utah DOT has demolished superstructures in less than 8 hours (without traffic
below); therefore an estimated time of 5 days is reasonable (with traffic below).
2. The construction of the new substructures can begin on day one. This is
because the new substructures are proposed to be built in a different footprint
than the old substructures. This is a recommended practice for construction of
accelerated bridge projects.
3. Several states have installed full depth precast concrete decks with weekend
closures (including removal of the old deck); therefore 3 days for an installation is
very reasonable.
4. The closure pours and curb pour are shown in series (6 days total). It will be
possible to construct these in parallel.
5. The approach roadway work begins as soon as the substructures are set. The
fact that the roadway is closed greatly facilitates raising the grade 3 feet for this
project.

Quality and Durability:

The details chosen have a proven
record of durability. The piers and pier
connections are very similar to piers
that were built for the Edison Bridge in
Florida. Figure CS4-9 shows the
completed Edison Bridge. This bridge
was built in a highly corrosive
environment. It has been in service
since 1992 and is still in good
condition.

Figure CS4-9: Edison Bridge

Page App D-30 Appendix D: Case Studies
 Full Depth Precast decks that are prestressed transversely and post tensioned
longitudinally have proven to virtually crack free. History has proven that this cannot be
said for cast-in-place concrete decks, which routinely have significant cracking due to
shrinkage and other effects. The Connecticut DOT built a precast deck system in 1990.
This deck is still in excellent condition.

The design of this hypothetical bridge also incorporated a jointless design. The bridge is
continuous at the pier and the abutments are integral. This type of design eliminates
potential leaking joints, which is the most problematic corrosion problem on bridges.

Costs:
This hypothetical bridge project was based on the premise of eliminating multi-stage
construction. The exact cost for stage construction is difficult to estimate, but anecdotal
evidence has shown that this can be a significant cost. By closing the roadway and
accelerating the bridge, no costly stage construction schemes are required. The
contractor will have the entire site for construction instead of constantly fighting with
traffic and exposing workers to a dangerous environment. There are other ways to
reduce construction costs using accelerated bridge construction, such as:
1. Standardization of prefabricated components and systematic use of accelerated
bridge construction can reduce costs by building repetitive components.
Contractors will become familiar with the processes and products, which normally
leads to lower bid prices. The Utah DOT has seen steady decreases in bid
prices as they systematically bid more accelerated bridge projects.
2. By decreasing project construction schedules, the following cost savings can be
realized:
a. Reduces rental costs of worksites (trailers, land rental, etc.)
b. Reduction in construction inspection costs. This is not a cost that is
carried in the bid, but is a cost that is realized by the agency.
c. Reduced costs of police details and flagging.
3. By reducing overall project time, the effects of inflation on construction are
reduced. Contractors estimate inflationary costs in bids. Faster projects equate
to lower inflation estimates.

Conclusions:
1. This hypothetical bridge demonstrates that it is possible to build a typical bridge
structure using all prefabricated elements.
2. Designers do not need to change the way they layout and design prefabricated
bridges. The bridge chosen is a typical highway overpass with up-to-date
amenities such as continuous girders, integral abutments and weathering steel.
3. There is not sacrifice of quality on bridges built with prefabricated elements. In
fact, it is possible to improve quality using this approach. Precast elements have
very few shrinkage cracks because they are allowed to shrink and cure with
restraint from adjoining members. This is especially true for precast decks.
4. By standardizing elements, eliminating construction staging, and reducing overall
project time, it may be possible to reduce overall project costs using accelerated
bridge construction.

Page App D-31 Appendix D: Case Studies

Page App D-32 Appendix D: Case Studies
 Appendix E: Glossary
The following terms are used in this document. The description of each term is written in
the context of this document.

Term Description

additives Substances (typically chemical) that are added to a grout

mixture to counteract the natural tendency of grouts to
shrink.

air release grouts A type of grout that does not rely on a chemical reaction to
achieve expansion. The additive reacts with water to
release air and cause expansion of the grout.

anchor rods Steel rods that are used to transfer loads from the
superstructure to the substructure. Often referred to as
“anchor bolts”, anchor rods differ in that they do not have a
hexagonal head. Anchor rods are normally specified
according to ASTM F1554.

approach slabs Structural slabs that span between the bridge abutments
and the approach fill. They are used to span across the
potential settlement of the approach roadway fills directly
behind the abutments.

backwall A structural wall element that retains the backfill soils

directly behind the beam ends on a bridge abutment

barrier A structural wall element that is used to contain aberrant

vehicles. They can be used on the bridge (parapet), or on
the approach roadway.

batching The process of combining and mixing the materials to form

concrete

bearing A structural element that connects the bridge

superstructure to the substructure, while allowing for
movements such as thermal expansion and contraction.

bleed water (grout) Water that seeps out of the surface of a grout due to
expansion of a grout in a confined or semi-confined area

blockouts Voids that are cast in prefabricated concrete elements that

are used in connecting the elements in the field

breastwall A wall that is typically non-structural that covers the beam

ends at the corners of the bridge abutments. Sometimes
referred to as “cheekwalls” by some states.

Page App E-1 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

bridge deck A structural slab that spans between support elements

(typically beams and girders) on a bridge. Bridge decks
can be made of many materials, including reinforced
concrete, steel, timber, fiber reinforced polymers, etc.

cable restrainers Structural elements that are used to restrain a bridge

superstructure from excessive lateral movement during
seismic events. The goal being to prevent the
superstructure from falling off the substructure, which is a
very common form of failure during seismic events.

camber A geometric adjustment of a bridge beam that is designed

to compensate for the the vertical deflection of the beam
when subjected to dead loads. Camber is typically built
into steel beams during fabrication. Camber is in inherent
side effect of prestressed girder construction.

carbon fiber A materials that is used in fiber reinforced polymer

elements (FRP) to provide the structure performance.
These fibers are oriented parallel to the direction of stress.

cast-in-place concrete Concrete that is cast on site (as opposed to cast in a

fabrication plant)

cheekwall A wall that is typically non-structural that covers the beam

ends at the corners of the bridge abutments. Sometimes
referred to as “breastwalls” by some states.

cofferdam An enclosure used to retain water in order to create a dry

work environment. Typically used for bridge pier
construction in rivers.

composite beam action The process of connecting the bridge deck to the beams or
girders to form a combined structural element.

composites The combining of multiple structural materials to form a

structural element.

compressive strength The value of uniaxial compressive stress reached when a

material fails.

concrete A construction material that consists of cement (commonly

portland cement), coarse aggregates (such as gravel
limestone or granite), fine aggregates (such as sand), and
water. Often other materials are added to improve the
structural properties such as chemical admixtures and
other cementitious materials (such as fly ash and slag
cement).

Page App E-2 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

concrete/steel hybrid A structural bridge deck system that combines structural

decks steel elements with composite concrete to create a
prefabricated deck system.

confinement steel Reinforcing steel used to contain the concrete core of a

column when subjected to plastic deformations brought on
by seismic loading.

consistency The state of a mixture of materials where the formulation is

of uniform quality.

constructability The extent to which a design of a structure provides for

ease of construction yet meets the overall strength
requirements.

construction joints Joints in structures that are used to facilitate the

construction of a portion of the structure. Construction
joints typically have reinforcing steel passing from one side
of the joint to the other.

construction stages A process of building a bridge in segments in order to

maintain traffic during construction.

continuity connection A connection used to connect two longitudinal bridge

element (beams) to form a continuous bridge system.
Typically these connections are only designed to resist live
load.

continuous spans A structural system where the beams span across more
than two supports without joints.

contraction joints Joints in structures that are used to allow the concrete
elements to shrink without causing excessive cracking.
Contraction joints typically do not have reinforcing steel
passing from one side of the joint to the other.

conventional construction Construction methods that do not include large scale

prefabrication.

cover concrete A layer of concrete placed around reinforcing steel to

prevent the corrosive attack from water and other
elements.

critical path The portion of the sequence of construction activities

which represents the longest overall duration. This in turn
determines the shortest time possible to complete a
project.

Page App E-3 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

cross frame A transverse structural element connecting adjacent

longitudinal flexural components used to transfer and
distribute vertical and lateral loads and to provide stability
during construction. Sometimes synonymous with the
term “diaphragm”.

crown The apex of the roadway cross slope.

curing compounds Chemical compounds that are used to prevent the rapid
evaporation of water from concrete during curing.

curb A structural element that is constructed at the edge of

bridge deck that is used to contain rain water runoff.
Curbs are often combined with structural railings to retain
vehicles.

debonding The process of disconnecting prestressing strand from the

surrounding concrete in a prestressed concrete element.
This is done to control stresses in prestressed elements
(typically at the at the ends).

deck The structural portion of a bridge that is directly beneath

the wheels of passing vehicles.

dewatering The process of removing water from an excavation that is

below the water table.

diaphragm A transverse structural element connecting adjacent

longitudinal flexural components used to transfer and
distribute vertical and lateral loads and to provide stability
during construction. Sometimes synonymous with the
term “cross frame”.

differential camber A variation on the camber of two adjacent beams. See

“camber”.

dimensional growth The phenomenon that results in the change in overall

structure width or length when multiple elements are
butted together. This is brought on by a build up of
element side variations or tolerances that are a result of
the fabrication process.

distribution direction A direction that is normally parallel to the supporting

members and is perpendicular to the direction of beam
action in reinforced concrete slabs that are designed for
one-way slab action.

Page App E-4 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

drilled shafts A deep foundation unit, wholly or partly embedded in the

ground, constructed by placing fresh concrete in a drilled
hole with or without steel reinforcement. Drilled shafts
derive their capacity from the surrounding soil and/or from
the soil or rock strata below its tip. Drilled shafts are also
commonly referred to as caissons, drilled caissons, bored
piles, or drilled piers.

dry pack grout A form of grout that has very stiff consistency that is placed
by packing the material into voids by hand and hand tools.

effective prestress The stress or force remaining in the prestressing steel after
all losses have occurred.

elastomeric bearing pads A type of structural bearing that is comprised of neoprene

or natural rubber. Sometimes combined with internal steel
plates, fiberglass sheets, or cotton duck sheets.

emulation design A design method where a prefabricated connection is

designed and detailed to act as (or emulate) a
conventional concrete construction joint.

epoxy adhesive A method of embedding reinforcing steel or steel rods into

anchoring systems hardened concrete to form a structural connection. The
process involves a drilled hole and a chemical adhesive.

epoxy grouts Grout materials with chemical adhesives used in place of

cementitious materials.

ettringite expansive grout Ettringite is crystal that forms as a result of the by product
of reactive chemicals that can be interground into the
cement in expansive grouts to produce non-shrink grout.

exodermic bridge deck A bridge deck system that is composed of a steel grid deck
combined with a top layer of concrete to form a composite
system. This system differs from filled grid decks in that
the concrete is placed above the top of the grid to
maximize the composite action between the steel and the
concrete.

expansion joints Joints in structures that are used to allow the concrete
elements to expand and contract with temperature
variation without causing excessive cracking. Expansion
joints are similar to contraction joints except they are
normally wider and often include a compressible material
to allow for thermal expansion. They also do not have
reinforcing steel passing from one side of the joint to the
other.

Page App E-5 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

fiber reinforced polymers A structural matrix of materials used to produce a

(FRP) structural element. FRP is commonly made reinforcing
fibers that are combined with polyester, epoxy or nylon,
which bind and protect the fibers from damage, and
transfers the stresses between fibers. FRPs are typically
organized in a laminate structure, such that each lamina
(or flat layer) contains an arrangement of unidirectional
fibers or woven fiber fabrics embedded within a thin layer
of light polymer matrix material. The fibers, typically
composed of carbon or glass, provide the strength and
stiffness.

filled steel grids A bridge deck system that is composed of a steel grid deck
combined that is either fully or partially filled with concrete.

flowable fill A material used to rapidly fill a void in embankment

backfills or under structures without compaction. It
normally has high flow characteristics. It is commonly
made up of sand, water and a minor amount of cement.

flying wingwalls Walls used to retain embankment soils at the corners of

abutments that are cantilevered from the end or rear of the
abutment as opposed to being supported on a footing.

foam block fill A material used to rapidly fill embankments where low unit
weight materials are desired. This is often used over
highly compressible soils such as clays.

full-depth precast A bridge deck system that is composed of reinforced

concrete deck slabs concrete elements that when placed, make up the full
structural deck system.

gantry crane A crane type that is characterized by two or more legs

supporting an overhead beam with a traveling trolley hoist.

gas generating grout A type of non-shrink grout that expands due to the
production of gas during the curing process. The gas is
generated by adding reactive materials to the mix (often
aluminum) to produce the gas.

girder-floorbeam bridges A bridge framing system that is composed of main girders

that run parallel to the roadway combined with transverse
floorbeams that support the deck. Often the system
includes stringer beams that run between floorbeams
(parallel to the roadway).

Page App E-6 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

glue laminated wood A structural framing material that consists of multiple layers
of dimensional lumber glued together to form a large
timber element.

grout A material (often cementitious or epoxy) that is used to fill

voids between elements.

grouted reinforcing splice A proprietary product used to join precast concrete

couplers elements by connecting reinforcing steel bars at the ends
of the elements. They consist of a steel casting sleeve
that is filled with grout. The reinforcing bars are inserted
into the ends of the casting and developed by the
interaction of the grout with the sleeve.

haunch The material between the top of a beam element and the
bottom of the bridge deck that gaps the space between the
two elements (also referred to as the “web gap” in some
states).

high early strength A concrete mixture that gains strength rapidly in order to
concrete accelerate construction.

integral abutment A bridge abutment type that is made integral with the
bridge superstructure through a combined shear and
moment connection. They are often constructed with a
single row of piles that allow for thermal movement and
girder rotation. Soil forces behind the abutments are
resisted through the strut action of the superstructure.

integral abutment The connection between the superstructure and the

connection integral abutment substructure that can resist both shear
and moment.

integral pier connection The connection between the superstructure and the pier
substructure elements that can resist both shear and
moment.

keeper assemblies Devices that are placed on top of substructures to prevent

lateral movement of the bridge superstructure. They are
often used to resist lateral seismic forces. They can be
constructed with structural steel or reinforced concrete.

leveling bolts Bolt assemblies embedded in prefabricated elements that

are used to make grade adjustments in the file during
construction.

Page App E-7 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

match casting A process of joining two precast concrete elements with

high precision. This is done by casting one element
against the adjoining element in the fabrication yard,
separating them, and then re-joining them in the field. The
field connection is normally made with thin epoxy
adhesives combined with post-tensioning

mechanical splices Devices used to connect reinforcing steel through

mechanical means. Examples of these systems include
grouted sleeves, wedge assemblies, and threaded bar
ends.

mechanically stabilized A soil-retaining system, employing either strip or grid-type,

earth (MSE) retaining metallic, or polymeric tensile reinforcements in the soil
walls mass, and a facing element that is either vertical or nearly
vertical. In this system, the soil mass is engaged by the
strips to become a gravity type retaining wall.

mild reinforcement Steel bars or grids within concrete elements that are used
to resist tension stresses. Mild reinforcement normally
consists of deformed steel bars or welded wire fabric.

modular block retaining A soil-retaining system employing interlocking soil-filled

walls timber, reinforced concrete, or steel modules or bins to
resist earth pressures by acting as gravity retaining walls.

near site fabrication A process of constructing prefabricated elements near the

bridge construction site in order to minimize problems with
shipping of large components.

non-shrink cementitious A structural grout used for filling voids between elements
grout that is formulated with cement, fine aggregates and
admixtures. The admixtures are used to provide
expansive properties of the material during curing. This
expansion counteracts the natural tendency of cement
grouts to shrink during curing.

one-way slab A reinforced concrete slab system that primarily spans

between two parallel support members. In this system, the
majority of the reinforcing runs perpendicular to the
support members.

open grid decks A bridge deck system that is composed of an open steel
grid spanning between supporting members.

parapet A structural element that is constructed at the edge of

bridge deck that is used to contain aberrant vehicles.

Page App E-8 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

partial-depth precast A bridge deck system that consists of relatively thin

concrete deck panels precast concrete panels that span between supporting
members that are made composite with a thin layer of site-
cast reinforced concrete. The precast panel makes up the
bottom portion of the structural slab. The site cast
concrete makes up the remainder of the structural slab.

pier box A prefabricated system that includes a precast concrete

box that is placed over driven piles or drilled shafts. The
box becomes the form to contain site cast reinforced
concrete. Often pier boxes are used in water applications
to form a cofferdam for the footing concrete.

pier cap A structural beam spanning between pier columns.

pier column The vertical structural element in a bridge pier

pile bent pier A bridge pier without a footing that is comprised of driven
piles or drilled shafts supporting a pier cap.

pile cap footing A footing that is supported by driven piles or drilled shafts.

plastic hinge A method of dissipating lateral seismic forces by allowing

portions of reinforced concrete pier columns to bend
beyond the yield point. Stability of the structure is
maintained by providing adequate confinement
reinforcement.

post-tensioning ducts A form device used to provide a path for post-tensioning

tendons or bars in hardened concrete

post-tensioning (PT) A method of prestressing in which the tendons (strands or

bars) are tensioned after the concrete has reached a
specified strength.

precast concrete Concrete elements that are cast in a location other than
their final position on the bridge.

prefabrication The process of building bridge elements prior to on-site

construction in order to accelerate the construction of the
bridge.

prestressed concrete Concrete components in which force is introduced into the

element during fabrication to produce internal stresses that
are normally opposite of the anticipated stresses in the
completed structure. Prestressing can be accomplished
with pretensioning or post-tensioning.

Page App E-9 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

pretensioning A method of prestressing in which strands are tensioned

before the concrete is placed, and released after the
concrete has hardened to a specified strength.

quality assurance and The process of inspection and control during fabrication to
quality control (QA/QC) ensure that the specified quality is achieved.

reflective cracking A crack that can form in site cast concrete that is placed
over a joint between two elements below the pour.

reinforced closure pours A method of connecting two prefabricated elements by

casting a segment of reinforced concrete between two
elements. The connection is often made using lap splices
or mechanical reinforcing connectors.

reinforced concrete Concrete elements with reinforcing steel cast into the
concrete to form a structural element. The steel is
normally used to resist tension stresses in the element.

reinforcing steel Steel placed in concrete elements (either be mild

reinforcement of prestressing steel).

saturated surface dry A condition that is normally specified for concrete surfaces
(SSD) condition that are to be grouted. Saturated Surface Dry describes
the condition of the concrete surface in which the pores
are filled with water; however no excess water is on the
surface. This condition minimizes the absorption of water
from the grout into the surrounding concrete.

segregation A condition where the distribution of course or fine

aggregates in the concrete or grout mix become non-
uniform.

self-propelled modular A high capacity transport trailer that can lift and move
transporter (SPMT) prefabricated elements with a high degree of precision and
maneuverability.

shear key A shaped joint between two prefabricated elements that

can resist shear through the geometric configuration of the
joint.

shear studs Headed steel rods that are welded to elements to provide
composite action between two bridge elements. Typically
used between beams and the deck slab.

sheeting A structural system used to retain earth and water and

allow for excavation during the construction of a bridge
substructure.

Page App E-10 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

shims pack Flat plates placed between two prefabricated elements

used to provide a specified separation. Shims are also
used to make vertical grade adjustments. Shims are
typically made of steel or polymer sheets.

shrinkage (grout) A property of cementitious concretes and grouts that

occurs during curing where the material reduces in size.

spandrel wall A wall that is constructed on the sides of earth filled arch
structures that are used to retain the fill soils.

spiral reinforcement. Transverse reinforcement used in reinforced concrete

columns to resist shear. Spirals are also used for
confinement of the concrete core as a plastic hinge forms.

steel stay-in-place forms Corrugated steel sheeting that is used to support the wet
concrete in a bridge deck during construction, and left in
place in the permanent structure.

strength direction A direction that is normally perpendicular to the supporting

members and is parallel to the direction of beam action in
reinforced concrete slabs that are designed for one-way
slab action.

stress laminated timber A timber bridge deck that is comprised of multiple layers of
deck bridges dimension lumber placed on edge and connected with
transverse prestressing. Shear transfer between the
laminations is accomplished through friction.

stringers There are two common uses for this term.

1. Longitudinal steel beams on short span multi-beam
bridges.
2. Secondary framing members on floor beam type
bridges that span from floor beam to floor beam.

stub abutments A short cantilever type abutment that is constructed near

the top of the approach embankment.

substructure The portion of the bridge that is below the beam and/or
deck elements. It typically includes piers, abutments, and
walls.

superstructure The portion of the bridge that is above substructure. It

typically includes beams, girders, trusses, and the bridge
deck.

Page App E-11 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

surface preparation The process of preparing a concrete surface for grouting

(grout) by cleaning or intentionally roughening the surface. This is
done to improve the adhesion of the grout to the concrete.
It typically includes sand blasting, water blasting, or hand
tool cleaning.

sweep The lateral curvature of a prefabricated element caused by

fabrication form irregularities and/or internal stresses.

test pours and test mock- A method of quality control whereas a contractor will build
ups a model of a portion of the bridge structure that includes a
void that requires grout placement. These are used to
demonstrate proper grout placement in complex voids.

timber deck panels Prefabricated timber panels that are made with glue
laminated lumber.

tolerance Specified allowable dimensional variations in prefabricated

elements. The variations are a result of irregularities in
formwork and minor deviations in measurements during
fabrication.

transverse ties Reinforcement used in reinforced concrete columns to

resist shear. Ties, if properly detailed, can also used for
confinement of the concrete core as a plastic hinge forms.

tremie concrete pour Concrete that is placed underwater and within a cofferdam
to resist the vertical pore pressure of the water below a
footing during construction.

user costs Costs that incurred by users of a highway network when

they are delayed due to construction activities.

variable web gap See “Haunch”

water content The specified amount of water in a concrete or grout mix.

wearing surface The top portion of the bridge deck that is directly below the
vehicle tires. Often wearing surfaces are designed to be
sacrificial and replaceable.

wet curing Curing is the process of retaining sufficient moisture

(water) in freshly placed grout/concrete to complete the
hydration reaction which occurs when water is introduced
to Portland cement. Wet curing leaves the freshly placed
grout/concrete in an environment of 100 percent humidity

Page App E-12 Appendix E: Glossary

 Term Description

working time The amount of time that a concrete or gout mix remains in
a liquid or plastic state so it can be placed and
consolidated.

yield strength The stress at which an elastic material begins to deform in

a plastic manner. Prior to yield, the material will deform
elastically and will return to its original shape when the
applied stress is removed. If loaded beyond yield and then
unloaded, the material will not return to its original shape.

Page App E-13 Appendix E: Glossary

Page App E-14 Appendix E: Glossary
 Appendix F: References

1. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway

and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., Fourth Edition 2007.
2. Decision-Making Framework for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PBES),
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Publication
Number FHWA-HIF-06-030, May 2006
3. Manual on the Use of Self-Propelled Modular Transporters to Remove and Replace
Bridges, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration,
Publication Number FHWA-HIF-07-022, June 2007
4. Emulating Cast-in-Place Detailing in Precast Concrete Structures ACI-550.1 R01,
The American Concrete Institute, 2001
5. Development of Precast Bent Cap Systems for Seismic Regions, National
Cooperative Highway Research Program, Project 12-74, 2007
6. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-03) and
Commentary (ACI 318R-03), American Concrete Institute Committee 318, 2003.
7. Tests on Re-Bar Splices in Reinforced Concrete Columns using NMB Splice Sleeves,
Report Number NPD-024, Splice Sleeve Japan, LTD.
8. ASTM C309 - 07 Standard Specification for Liquid Membrane-Forming Compounds
for Curing Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
9. ASTM C 1107/C 1107M REV A Standard Specification for Packaged Dry,
Hydraulic-Cement Grout (Nonshrink), ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
PA
10. ASTM C 928 - Standard Specification for Packaged, Dry, Rapid-Hardening
Cementitious Materials for Concrete Repair, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA
11. CRD C-621 – Army Corp of Engineers Specification for Non-Shrink Grout, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Concrete Research Division

12. ASTM C 109/C 109M Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic
Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens), ASTM International,
West Conshohocken, PA

13. ASTM C 827 REV A Standard Test Method for Change in Height at Early Ages of
Cylindrical Specimens from Cementitious Mixtures, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA

14. ASTM C 1090 Standard Test Method for Measuring Changes in Height of
Cylindrical Specimens from Hydraulic-Cement Grout, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA

15. ASTM D6449 - 99(2008) Standard Test Method for Flow of Fine Aggregate
Concrete for Fabric Formed Concrete (Flow Cone Method) , ASTM International,
West Conshohocken, PA

Page App F-1 Appendix F: References

 16. Tolerance Manual for Precast and Prestressed Concrete Construction, MNL 135-
00, Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI), Chicago, IL

17. Manual for the Evaluation and Repair of Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge
Products (MNL-37-06), Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI), Chicago, IL

18. ANSI/AASHTO/AWS D1.5-96 Bridge Welding Code, American Association of State

Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C and The American Welding
Society, Inc., Miami, FL

19. Abendroth, R.E., "Nominal Strength of Composite Prestressed Concrete Bridge

Deck Panels," Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 2, February
1995, pp. 307-318

20. Babaei, K., Fouladgar, A., and Nicholson, R., “Nighttime Bridge Deck Replacement
with Full Depth Precast Concrete Panels at Route 7 over Route 50, Fairfax County,
Virginia,” Transportation Research Board, 80th Annual Meeting, January 7-11, 2001,
Paper #01-0196, Washington, D.C.

21. Badie, S.S.; Baishya, M.C, and Tadros, M.K. “NUDECK- An Efficient and Economical
Precast Bridge Deck System”, Prestressed/Precast Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal,
September-October, Vol. 43, No. 5, 1998, pp. 56-74.

22. Badie, S.S. and Tadros, M.K. “Full Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panel
Systems” Report Number 584, National Cooperative Highway Research Program,
Transportation Research Board, 2008

23. Badie, S.S.; Baishya, M.C, and Tadros, M.K. “NUDECK- An Efficient and
Economical Precast Bridge Deck System”, Prestressed/Precast Concrete Institute
(PCI) Journal, September-October, Vol. 43, No. 5, 1998, pp. 56-74.
24. Badie, S. S., Tadros, M. K., Kakish, H. F., Splittgerber, D. L., and Baishya, M. C,
“Large Studs for Composite Action in Steel Bridge Girders,” American Society of Civil
Engineering (ASCE), Bridge Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, May/June 2002, pp. 195-203.
25. Biswas, M., "Precast Bridge Deck Design Systems," PCI Journal, V. 31, No. 2,
March-April 1986, pp. 40-94.
26. Culmo, M.P., "Bridge Deck Rehabilitation Using Precast Concrete Slabs," Paper
Number IBC-91-55, Eighth Annual International Bridge Conference, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, June 10-12, 1991.
27. Issa, M.A., Idriss, A.T., Kaspar, I.I., and Khayyat, S.Y., "Full Depth Precast and
Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge Deck Panels," PCI Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1,
January-February 1995a, pp. 59-80.
28. Issa, M.A., Yousif, A.A., Issa, M.A., Kaspar, I.I., and Khayyat, S.Y., "Field
Performance of Full Depth Precast Panels in Bridge Deck Reconstruction," PCI
Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, May-June 1995d, pp. 82-108.
29. Issa, M.A., Yousif, A.A., Issa, M.A., Kaspar, I.I., and Khayyat, S.Y., "Analysis of Full
Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panels," PCI Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, January-
February 1998, pp. 74-85.

Page App F-2 Appendix F: References

 30. Issa, M.A., Ralph Anderson, Thomas Domagalski, and Salah Khayyat, “Design
Considerations of Full Depth Precast/Prestressed Concrete Bridge Deck Panels,”
Proceedings of the 1st annual Concrete Bridge Conference, October 6-9, 2002, p
20.
31. Issa, Mohsen A., Patton, Thomas, Abdalla, Hiba, Yousif, Alfred, and Issa,
Mahmoud A., "Composite Behavior of Shear Connections in Full-Depth Precast
Concrete Bridge Deck Panels on Steel Stringers," PCI Journal, September/October
2003, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 76-89.
32. Menkulasi, F. and Roberts-Wollmann, C.L., “Behavior of Horizontal Shear
Connections for Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Decks on Prestressed I-Girders,”
PCI Journal, V. 50, No. 3., May/June 2005, pp. 60-73.
33. Scholz, D.P., Wallenfelsz, J.A., Cintia, L. Roberts-Wollmann, C.A.,
“Recommendations for the Connection Between Full Depth Precast Bridge Deck
Panel Systems and Precast I-Beams”, Final Report Number VTRC 07-CR17, Virginia
Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA
34. Tadros, M.K., Badie, S.S., and Kamel, M.R., "A New Connection Method for Rapid
Removal of Bridge Decks," PCI Journal, May-June 2002, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 2-12.
35. Tadros, M. K., and Baishya, M. C., "Rapid Replacement of Bridge Decks," Final
Report, 12-41, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation
Research Board, July 1997.
36. Tadros, M. K., and Baishya, M. C., “Rapid Replacement of Bridge Decks,” National
Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 407, Washington, D.C.,
1998.
37. Lutz J. G., Scalia D. J., "Deck Widening and Replacement of Woodrow Wilson
Memorial Bridge" PCI Journal, V. 29, No. 3, May-June, 1984, pp. 74-93.
38. Merrill, Brian D, “Texas’ Use of Precast Concrete Stay-in-Place Forms for Bridge
Decks”, 2002 Concrete Bridge Conference,
http://www.dot.state.tx.us/publications/bridge/precast_stay_forms.pdf
39. Jones, H.L., Furr, H.L., “A Study of Prestressed Panels and Composite Action in
Concrete bridges Made of Prestressed Beams, Prestressed Sub-Deck Panels, and
Cast-in-place Deck”, Research Project No. 2-5-70-145, Texas Highway Department
40. Bieschke, L.A. and Klingner, R.E., “The Effects of Transverse Strand Extensions on
the Behavior of Precast Prestressed Panel Bridges”, Research Report 303-1F,
Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, June 1982
41. “Full Depth Precast Concrete Deck Slabs”, PCINER-02-FDPCDS, Precast
Prestressed Concrete Institute, Northeast Bridge Technical Committee, June 2002.
42. “Steel Bridge Erection Guide Specification”, The National Steel Bridge Alliance in
conjunction with AASHTO, S10.1-2007 (AASHTO NSBASBEGS-1)
43. “Prestressed Concrete Girder Continuity Connection”, PCINER-98-PCGCC,
Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute, Northeast Bridge Technical Committee,
May 1998.
44. “Guidelines for Accelerated Bridge Construction Using Precast/Prestressed
Concrete Components”, PCINER-06-ABC, Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute,
Northeast Bridge Technical Committee, 2006

Page App F-3 Appendix F: References

 45. “Steel Bridge Bearing Design and Detailing Guide”, The National Steel Bridge
Alliance in conjunction with AASHTO, G9.1-2004 (AASHTO NSBASBB-1)
46. “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete – ACI 318”, Appendix D,
American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI
47. Ross, H.E., Sickling, D.L., Zimmer, R.A., Michie, J.D., “Recommended Procedure for
the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features,” National Cooperative
Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 350, Washington, D.C., 1993.
48. ASTM A 123 - Standard Specification for Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on
Iron and Steel Products, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
49. Matsumoto, E.E., Waggoner, M.C., Sumen, G., Kreger, M.E., Wood, S.L., Breen,
J.E., “Development of a Precast Bent Cap System”, Center for Transportation
Research, The University of Texas at Austin, January 2001
50. Precast Prestressed Concrete Piles, BM-20-04, Precast Prestressed Concrete
Institute (PCI), Chicago, IL
51. Endicott, W., "Precast Bridges Stand the Test of Time" PCI Ascent, Winter 1994, pp.
30-33.
52. ASTM C1433 - Standard Specification for Manufacture of Precast Reinforced
Concrete Box Culverts, Storm Drains, and Sewers, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA

Page App F-4 Appendix F: References

 Office of Bridge Technology

Connection Details for Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems

This document can also be found online at the FHWA office of bridge Technology

www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge

Publication No. FHWA-IF-09-010