Counter Affidavit
Counter Affidavit
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
PADRE FAURA, MANILA
REDENDO DELLOSA
Respondent.
x-----------------------------------------------x
COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT
Sta. Ana, Manila, after having duly sworn in accordance with law, depose and say:
my legal counsel, Atty. Remedios C. Balbin, during her visit to me at PACER, Camp
Crame, where I am detained, I learned that as per PNP investigation, I was alleged to
have been identified as one of the so-called ABU SAYAFF Group members involved in
the Tumahubong kidnapping, docketed under Crim. Case No. 121887H to 123221H (52
counts) now pending before RTC Branch 162, Pasig City, and for which I was directed to
2. That I wish to emphasize that it was only then, or only on April 14, 2004,
that I was charged with kidnapping allegedly committed on March 20, 2000 in
abducted, and placed under detention without any criminal charge by the PNP led by a
certain PNP officer whose name I later learned to be PINSP Armando L. Barbasa, Jr.;
interrogators who ordered me to admit that it was I who blew up the Superferry last
suffered I felt exhausted and weak from the brutality inflicted on me particularly,
beginning the same day of my abduction, covering my head with a plastic bag, my eyes
I could hardly breathe, I recall quite vaguely that I was made to sign something; or
thumbmark something. I do not know what happened but they told me later that they had
admitting my accountability for the Superferry Bombing and Fire, although up to this
Committee’s Investigation Report at the MARINA Coast Guard Board of Marine Inquiry
headed by Capt. Arnie Santiago, on the Superferry found that there was no sign of any
explosive at the fire scene and that there is reason to believe that it was caused by the
combustion of paints stored in Superferry, and not due to any explosive caused by any
8. That a day or so later, I was told at PACER that I was not being detained
Tumahabong Kidnapping, subject of a pending case before RTC Branch 162, Pasig City
and we were made to join a police line-up and shown to witnesses, and one of my
a “Salaysay” dated April 10, 2004, that Cachuela an alleged kidnap victim said, thus:
10. That in other words, witness Cachuela then nine (9) years old, reported
that undersigned Accused Dellosa’s participation had a gun and was among those
20, 2000, in Tumahubong Elementary School, which continued for over a month;
12. That Respondent vehemently denies the accusation, for the reasons
discussed below:
13. That the subpoena shown by the PACER to my legal counsel states that I
have to appear and submit my counter-affidavit during the preliminary investigation set
14. That I hereby stress that no Complainant’s Affidavit was ever furnished
me or to my legal counsel who had long ago submitted her Entry of Appearance (Annex
“2” and made an integral part hereof; despite which no copy of the alleged charge was
given)
15. That I will respond, and hereby submits my counter affidavit to what I can
deduce is the criminal charge against me, namely, that I allegedly participated in the
Tumahabong kidnapping incident that reportedly took place on March 20, 2000 in
RTC Branch 162, Pasig City, but no information or copies of the documents in said case
17. However, in order to fast-track the proceedings and inquiry into my case, I
hereby swear under oath that on March 20, 2000, I was not anywhere in Mindanao during
that time, or at any reasonable time, before or after March 20, 2000;
18. That I was an employee of Liberty Broadcasting Network Inc. from June
03, 1996 up to March 15, 2002, reporting for duty regularly and faithfully as
at the LBNI’s Adminstrative Offices in Makati City, Metro Manila (See Annexes 3-3a,
Seminar Participation), and my employment records will show that I was never absent
community in Anda, where I could concentrate on, and undergo, more intensive studies
20. That my studies were interrupted in May, 2002, when the PNP entered the
area and accused the members of our community with “terrorism” and illegal possession
of firearms, but the case against four(4) including myself was later dismissed when it
appeared that there were only two(2) short arms and one(1) air rifle taken from the
companions. These arms were duly licensed although at that time, the licenses had
expired two(2) months before the date of the incident, hence, the evaluation is still
21. That to repeat, the case against me was dismissed, but two of my
companions – alleged owner of the guns above-described, were to be arraigned but legal
counsel elevated it for review by the Department of Justice (DOJ), where it remains
and I am prepared to cooperate and establish my innocence of any violation of law which
was allegedly committed, and that I reiterate that I am absolutely innocent of any
criminal offense.