Universal Currnet Sensor
Universal Currnet Sensor
1. INTRODUCTION
2. EARLY SOLUTIONS
The oldest technique is to measure the voltage drop across a resistor placed in the
current path. To minimize energy losses the resistor is kept very small, so the
measured voltage must be highly amplified. The amplifier’s offset voltage must be
as small as possible and its supply voltage must be at the potential of the circuit,
often 110 V mains (230 V in Europe) with high parasitic peaks from which its
output must be isolated. This requirement increases overall system cost.
The two types of Hall effect current sensor are open loop and closed loop. In
the former, the amplified output signal of the Hall element is directly used as the
measurement value. The linearity depends on that of the magnetic core. Offset and
drift are determined by the Hall element and the amplifier. The price of these
sensors is low, but so is their sensitivity.
Closed-loop Hall sensors are much more precise. The Hall voltage is first
highly amplified, and the amplifier’s output current then flows through a
compensation coil on the magnetic core (see Figure 1). It generates a
magnetization whose amplitude is the same but whose direction is opposite to that
of the primary current conductor. The result is that the magnetic flux in the core is
compensated to zero. (The principle is similar to that of an op amp in inverter
mode, for which the input voltage is always close to zero.)
The nonlinearity and temperature dependence of the Hall element are thus
compensated but the offset remains. Closed-loop current sensors work up to
frequencies of ~150 kHz. They are not cheap, though, and for high currents they
become very bulky.
For best performance, these sensors must have a very good linearity between
the measured quantity (magnetic field) and the output signal. Even when improved
by the barber poles, the linearity of magnetoresistive (MR) sensors is not very
high, so the compensation principle used on Hall sensors is also applied here. An
electrically isolated aluminum compensation conductor is integrated on the same
substrate above the permalloy resistors (see Figures 3 and 4). The current flowing
through this conductor generates a magnetic field that exactly compensates that of
the conductor to be measured. In this way the MR elements always work at the
same operating point; their nonlinearity therefore becomes irrelevant. The
temperature dependence is also almost completely eliminated. The current in the
compensation conductor is strictly proportional to the measured amplitude of the
field; the voltage drop across a resistor forms the electrical output signal.
Magnetoresistive sensors, as are Hall elements, are very well suited for the
measurement of electric currents. In such applications it is important that external
magnetic fields do not distort the measurement. This is achieved by forming a full
bridge made of four MR resistors, where the two arms of the bridge are spatially
separated.
The barber poles have the same orientation in the two arms, so that only a
field difference between the two positions is sensed. This configuration is
insensitive to external homogeneous perturbation fields. The primary current
conductor is U-shaped under the substrate, so that the magnetic fields acting on the
two arms of the bridge have the same amplitude but opposite directions. This way
the voltage signals of the two half-bridges are added.
The sensors have been in production for several years. A ceramic plate is
used as the substrate, onto the back of which the primary conductor is glued to
achieve an isolation of several kilovolts.
The sensors require neither a core nor a magnetic shielding, and can
therefore be assembled in a very compact and cheap way. They have a linearity
error of <0.1%, gain error <0.2%, offset voltage <10 mV, and temperature drift of
the gain <100 ppm/K. The output signal is calibrated to 2.5 V at nominal current
by a laser trimming process or by a digital calibration. The rise time (10%–90%) is
~1.7 ms, which corresponds to a frequency bandwidth (–1 dB) >50 kHz; this value
results from the speed of the regulation. The sensor is powered by a standard
bipolar voltage of ±15 V and the power consumption is 320 mW to 640 mW,
depending on the measured current value.
The size of the actual MR sensor chip with the four permalloy strips on
silicon is 1 mm by 2 mm2, the distance between the two arms of the bridge being
1.6 mm. It is mounted with the electronics on a 23 mm by 35 mm2 single in-line
hybrid circuit designed for through-hole PCB mounting with very low profile. The
NT-xx product family from Sensitec or F.W. Bell includes sensors for nominal
currents of 5 A, 15 A, 25 A, and 50 A.
In the standard sensor types described thus far, the nominal current is set by
the geometry of the primary conductor that is part of the system and by the
distance between the MR chip and the conductor. Recent investigations, however,
have demonstrated that the high-current bus bar need not be interrupted or guided
through a hole, as required with Hall transducers. Instead, it can simply be shaped
in the form of a bus bar plate. A sensor module realized as a dual in-line surface
mount device component can be mounted on the power PCB board placed above
the bus bar plate so that the current flow can be directly measured.
The advantages are obvious: these current sensors are not only small,
compact, and light, but also cheap and easy to mount. The primary current
conductor can be part of the application and need not be mounted separately. This
opens the way to completely new construction possibilities for developers of power
electronic modules and devices such as for mains receivers and frequency
inverters.
In modern device fabrication an alloy commonly called Perm alloy (81% Ni,
19% Fe) turns out to be the best compromise in terms of device sensitivity,
longevity, and reproducibility. As does the wire, the strip has an orientation of the
inner magnetic moment, M0, parallel to its long axis. When an external field is
applied, the total magnetization, M, of the strip is turned at an angle, ø.
In the most general case, the electrical resistance of AMR material depends
on the angle, ø, between the direction of the magnetization, M, and the direction of
the current going through it. This dependency can be described by the relative
change in resistivity, DR/R being proportional to cos2ø. This means that when the
current and magnetic moment, M, are parallel, the resistance of the strip is greatest;
when they are at a 90° angle to each other, it is smallest. Disregarding the influence
of film thickness, the maximum relative change in resistance is a material constant.
In Perm alloy it is typically 2%–3%.
The characteristics of a simple strip make it less than desirable for
measurement applications.
The reasons are that it exhibits a vanishing sensitivity at low fields; that the
direction of the external field cannot be determined; and except for the region
around 45°, there is nearly no signal linearity.
They can be used at high frequencies (some MHz are no problem) and high
temperatures such as those in automotive environments (continuous service at
150°C, peak values at 190°C), and exhibit low and stable offset values. Due to
their high sensitivity (~10 X that of Hall devices) they can be used to detect very
weak fields (the present limit is ~10 nT)
demand on the combustion engine. Very effective start/stop systems can thus be
realized. The engine is switched off whenever the vehicle stops and started again
automatically when the driver wants to go on. These measures should lead to fuel
savings of around 30% compared to today’s vehicles.
necessary magnetic field gradient. For this application, the NTS-xx is mounted
directly above the bar and electronically calibrated in situ.