CHAPTER 1:

WHAT IS LANGUAGE?

PowerPoint by Don L. F. Nilsen

to accompany
An Introduction to Language (8th or 9th edition 2007/2011)
by Victoria Fromkin, Robert Rodman
and Nina Hyams

|

 LANGUAGE PLAY &
MAPPING
The primary function of language is not
to communicate, but is rather to think
creatively or analogically. Language
play allows humans to map an infinite
number of real-world details onto a
small finite number of sounds, letters
and words.
(cf. Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 8-11)

| 
And the exciting thing is that
this mapping happens not
only for the infinite details of
the real world, but of all
possible worlds whether real,
discovered, invented,
postulated, fictionalized, or
imagined.
| 
 THE CONTINUITY PARADOX
Derek Bickerton states it as follows:
³Until we cease to regard language as
primarily communicative and begin to
treat it as primarily representational, we
cannot hope to escape from the
Continuity Paradox´ (Bickerton 689).

| |
FORM-MEANING CORRELATION

CONTRAST SOUNDS, SPELLINGS AND MEANINGS:

Antonyms: tall vs. short
Converses: buy vs. sell
Cognates: embarrassed vs. embarazada
Heteronyms: minute vs. minute
Homographs: bank vs. bank
Homonyms: Homographs or Homophones
Homophones: too vs. two vs. to
Hyponyms: metaphor vs. metaphor
Synonyms: big vs. large
(Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 196-198)
|
WORD-LEVEL VS. SENTENCE-LEVEL GRAMMAR

LEXICAL: SYNTACTIC:

AMBIGUITY: Take your pick! Call me a taxi!

ANOMALY: She wanted a gnepf. John me cow a gave.

PARAPHRASE: William hit a policeman. Bill hit John.

vs. Bill slugged a cop. vs. John was hit by Bill.

| 
WHAT A GRAMMAR MUST DEAL WITH

Analysis vs. Synthesis:

Parsing vs. Generative Grammar

Denotation vs. Connotation:

Pro-Choice vs. Pro-Life views of
³abortion´

Systematic vs. Accidental Gaps:

³schplick´ vs. ³blick´
| 
 FORM VS. MEANING
Linguistics is concerned with the mapping of
meaning onto form (decoding) and form onto
meaning (encoding).

The form is the surface structure (phonology,

graphology, morphology and syntax)

The meaning is the deep structure (semantics,

pragmatics, discourse)
(cf. Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 8-11)
| 
 LEVELS OF ADEQUACY

Prescriptive Adequacy: What people should do

Descriptive Adequacy: What people do do

Explanatory Adequacy: Patterns, Trends, and Predictions

Evaluative Adequacy: Based on Elegance

Simplicity
Completeness
Internal Consistency
Generative Power
(cf. Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 13-18)

| 
 SURFACE STRUCTURE
Syntax Allotag Tagmeme

Morphology Allomorph Morpheme

Graphology Allograph Grapheme

Phonology Allophone Phoneme

|

 DEEP STRUCTURE
Pragmatics (Context, Deictics, Anaphora,
Speech Acts, Conversational Implicatures,
Intent, Felicity Conditions)

Pragmatics Allobehavior Behavioreme

Semantics Alloseme Sememe

|


 EVOLUTION
During the past five million years, ³our forebears
became predominantly right-handed, made use of
increasingly sophisticated tools, and organized their
culture in ever more complex ways.´ This evolution
resulted in ³a puny, almost hairless animal, with a
bent windpipe that reduced breathing efficiency to
nearly half of its original capacity. The creature¶s
teeth were practically useless for chewing.´ But we
had an asymetrical brain with the left hemisphere
being efficient at learning language. (Heny 634).

|

 M. A. K. Halliday¶s 7 Functions of Language:

Instrumental: To get things done

Regulatory: To control other people

Interactional: To define groups and relationships

Personal: To express feelings and beliefs

Heuristic:To test hypotheses or to learn

Imaginative: To create a world

Representational: To give information (Clark, 52)

|

 In terms of language,
Who¶s in charge?

³We make language more than language

makes us´ (Clark, 55).

Go to slide 15 to find out what Humpty

Dumpty said about language?

|
|
 In Through the Looking-Glass
Humpty Dumpty Says to Alice

³I don¶t know what you mean by µglory,¶ ´ Alice said.

Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. ³Of course you don¶t²till I

tell you. I meant µthere¶s a nice knock-down argument for you!¶ ´

³But µglory¶ doesn¶t mean µa nice knock-down argument¶,´ Alice

objected.

³When u use a word,´ Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather a scornful tone,

³it means just what I choose it to mean²neither more nor less.´

³The question is,´ said Alice, ³whether you
 make words mean so
many different things.´

³The question is,´ said Humpty Dumpty, ³which is to be

master. That¶s all.´

|


    

    

!"#
$%  
  &
  $ 
' ( %% 

$ &%% (


$) 
%   * $)  %+
,,'%
 
|

THE INNATENESS HYPOTHESIS
Noam Chomsky claims that language is
innate.

B. F. Skinner claims that language is

learned; it is basically a stimulus-
response mechanism.

|

Noam Chomsky reviewed B. F.
Skinner¶s Verbal Behavior in
Language, the journal of the
Linguistic Society of America
and convincingly presented
twelve types of evidence that
language is basically innate,
not learned.
|

1. Language is very complex. Consider the complexity of
any complete English grammar book.

2. The model for language learning is imperfect. Mothers

use caregiver language; friends use baby talk; children
use modified grammar (holophrastic, pivot-open, or
telegraphic).

3. All humans learn a spoken language (NOTE: Chomsky

does not claim that written language is innate).
(Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 1-34)

|

4. No animals learn a human-type language. However,
some animal languages are impressive:

þ


 
  
  


  
  

bees (Von Frisch)

dolphins (Lilly)
birds, parrots and cockatiels
canines
equines
bovines
felines
ants
(cf. Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 21-27)
| 
ANIMAL MESSAGES: Come. Go. Food. Protection
(camouflage, assistance, misleading enemies«). Sex.
Territory, Dominance, Mimic, Defiance, Friendship,
Attention

ANIMAL LANGUAGE: Calls. Body Coloring and Shape.

Tail Slap, Facial Expression. Tail Wagging, Baring
Throat, Dancing (Round, Tail-wagging, Sickle),
Whistling, Chuttering, Attacking, Singing, Giving Off
Pheromones

HUMAN-LANGUAGES AMONG ANIMALS: AMESLAN,

Yerkish, Computers, Magnetic Chips, ³Sugar Fruit,´
³Finger Bracelet´ 2nd-Generation Language (Planet of
the Apes)

| 

!"##$#%&%'!('#)*+ )*+

| 
AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE: CONFIGURATION
(Emmorey 82)
(cf Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 257-258)

| 
AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE: PLACE (Emmorey
82)
(cf Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 257-258)

| |
AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE: MOVEMENT (Emmorey 82)
(cf Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 257-258)

| 
BEES¶ ROUND DANCE (Kemp & Smith 663)

| 
BEES¶ TAIL-WAGGING DANCE (Kemp and Smith 664)

| 
SARAH¶S SYMBOLS (Kemp and Smith 672)

| 
YERKISH LEXIGRAMS (Kemp and Smith
672)

| 
5. There are many human-language universals, and these are only a
small subset of semiotic possibilities; computer languages don¶t
have these same natural-language constraints (embedding, cross-
over, A over A, etc.).

6. There is a critical age for foreign-language acquisition (around

puberty).

7. There is a sequence in language acquisition (holophrastic, pivot-

open, telegraphic, adult). Note also color acquisition in both
phylogeny and ontogeny.
(Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 1-37)

| 
8. Human language is rule-governed (like
mathematics). It is not memorized.

9. Human language is very creative.

Except for small-talk, almost all sentences
are novel. Language can adjust to new
situations (unlike bee-language for
unexpected placing of honey source).
(Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 1-37)

| 

10. Human language has duality. A limited
number of symbols are reused in many different
ways.

11. Human language has displacement in Time,

Place, and Truth.

12. Human language is not predictable. Given a

particular stimulus, there is a much wider range
of responses for humans than for animals.
(Fromkin Rodman Hyams [2011] 1-37)

| 
 CONCLUSION
The most important of Chomsky¶s
observations is that ³Language is Creative.´

Language should not be prescribed, as that

would limit its creativity. Rather, language
should be allowed to adapt to social
situations. In other word language VARIES
in the following ways:

| 
 LANGUAGE VARIATION
V-Vocational Differences

A-Age Differences
Individual (holophrastic vs. adult language)
Language (Old English vs. Modern English)

R-Regional Differences

I-Informality Differences

E-Ethnic Differences

S-Sex Differences

| |
 METAPHOR, METONYMY, SYNECDOCHE,
IRONY AND LANGUAGE PLAY

The most creative aspect of

language is its ability to adapt to
new situations, and it does this by
using the ³Master Tropes´:
Metaphor, Metonymy, Synecdoche,
and Irony.

| 
 HOMO ERECTUS, HOMO SAPIENS,
HOMO LOQUENS AND HOMO RIDENS
Humans have been called ³homo erectus´ because like
primates, kangaroos and chickens they stand erect.

They have been called ³homo sapiens´ because they

are the thinking animal.

They have been called ³home loquens´ because they

are the talking animal.

But they have been called ³homo ridens´ because they

are the only animal that laughs appropriately.

| 
 LANGUAGE FOR ENGAGEMENT
LANGUAGE FOR TRANSCENDENCE

Language is a tool that allows us to deal with

the real world. It allows us to solve the
problems of the real world. It helps us
survive.

But as we spend less and less time working to

survive and more and more time thinking and
pondering, our language needs to meet these
new needs.

| 
 Exercise 2: *Ungrammatical
A. Robin forced the sherrif go.
B. Napoleon forced Josephine to go.
C. The devil made Faust go.
D. He passed by a large pile of money.
E. He came by a large sum of money
F. He came a large sum of money by.
G. Did in a corner little Jack Horner sit?
H. Elizabeth is resembled by Charles
I. Nancy is eager to please.
(Fromkin Rodman & Hyams [2011] 38-39)

| 
J. It is easy to frighten Emily.
K. It is eager to love a kitten.
L. That birds can fly amazes.
M. The fact you are late to class is surprising.
N. Has the nurse slept the baby yet?
O. I was surprised for you to get married.
P. I wonder who and Mary went swimming.
Q. Myself bit John.
R. What did Alice eat the toadstool with?
S. What did Alice eat the toadstool and?
(Fromkin Rodman & Hyams [2011] 38-39)
| 
 Exercise 3: Onomatopoeia
Animals across languages:

Cows Horses Pigs

Chickens Roosters Chicks
Lions Tigers Goat
Cats Dogs Turkeys
Geese Pigeons Sheep
Pigs Frogs Donkeys
Hens Crows Flies
(Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams [2011] 39)

| |
Exercise 3: Sound Symbolism
Bang Groan Smash
Beep Gurgle Snap
Bubble Hiss Swish
Buzz Kerplop Thump
Clap Screech Tinkle
Click Sigh Whiz
Crackle Slap Zing
Crunch Slurp Snap crackle & pop
Gong Smack
(Fromkin, Rodman &
Hyams [2011] 39)

| |

 Exercise 3: Reduplication
Children Adults: Other Examples:
Bowwow Hanky Panky
Dada Ticktock
Dingdong Tooty Fruity
Doodoo Zig Zag
Mama Zsa Zsa (Fromkin, Rodman &
Hyams [2011] 92)
Peepee
Weewee

| |
 Exercise 4: Iconicity &
Paralanguage
I II III IV X Shhh! Shush! Raspberry (Bronx
1230 Hiss Cheer)
˺˻˼˹ Tsk tsk Uchhhhh
* Uh Huh! (yes) Yuchhhhh
Å Uh uh (no) Wolf Whistle
.?! Huh? Swearing
$ Giddyup (*^&%+#@!)
(lateral click)
(Fromkin, Rodman &
Hyams [2011] 39)

| |
 Exercise 12: Pygmalion
by George Bernard Shaw
³The rain in Spain is mainly on the plain.´

³In Heartford, Herriford and Hartshire,

hurricanes hardly ever happen.´

³Look at her²a prisoner of the gutters;

Condemned by ev¶ry syllable she utters.
By right she should be taken out and hung
For the cold-blooded murder of the English
tongue!´ (Pygmalion, 109)

| ||
!My Fair Lady by Lerner and Lowe
An Englishman¶s way of speaking absolutely classifies
him.
The moment he talks he makes some other English
despise him,
One common language I¶m afraid we¶ll never get.
Oh, why can¶t the English learn to
Set a good example to people whose English is painful
to your ears?
The Scots and the Irish leave you close to tears.
There even are places, where English completely
disappears.
In America, they haven¶t used it for years! (110)
(Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams [2011] 40-41)
| |
 !!Exercise 13:
English Only vs. Bilingualism
Discuss Queen Elizabeth I¶s outlawing of Celtic dress, music and
traditions

King James Translation of the Bible into English to unite England

with Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, and Scotland by an English-Only
movement

What about the English-only movement today vs. bilingualism?

(Fromkin, Rodman & Hyams [2011] 41)

| |
 !!!Animal-Play Web Sites:
ANIMAL POWER MOVES:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkYbFr7dcIs

CATS VS. DOGS PLAYING:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dugipeVZtE

ELEPHANTS PLAYING SOCCER:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6sP09MejTcA

ELEPHANT PLAYING SOCCER:

http://www.videovat.com/videos/1419/elephant-soccer.aspx

| |
I CAN HAS CHEEZBURGER WEB SITE:
http://icanhascheezburger.com/

LOLCAT BIBLE:
http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Genesis_1

PETCENTRIC WEB SITE:

http://www.petcentric.com/article/aspx?C=1&OID=180

TAASP: THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF PLAY:

http://www.tasplay.org

| |
References:

Aitchison, Jean. ³Predestinate Grooves: Is There a

Preordained Language µProgram¶?´ (Clark 560-578).

Bickerton, Derek. ³The Continuity Paradox´ (Clark 681-

695).

Bolton, W. F. ³Language: An Introduction´ (Clark, 61-

73).

Clark, Virginia, Paul Eschholz, and Alfred Rosa.

Language: Readings in Language and Culture, 6th
Edition. New York, NY: St. Martin¶s Press, 1998.

Daniels, Harvey A. ³Nine Ideas about Language (Clark,

43-60).

| |
Emmorey, Karen. ³Sign Language´ (Clark 78-94).

Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams. ³What is

Language?´ An Introduction to Language, 9th Edition. Boston,
MA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2011, 1-42.

Heny, Jeannine. ³Brain and Language (Clark, 634-657).

Kemp, William, and Roy Smith. ³Signals, Signs, and Words: From
Animal Communication to Language´ (Clark 658-679).

Nilsen, Alleen Pace, and Don L. F. Nilsen. Encyclopedia of 20th

Century American Humor. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 2000.

Nilsen, Don L. F., and Alleen Pace Nilsen. Language Play: An

Introduction to Linguistics. Rowley, MA: Newbury House
Publishers, 1978.

|