Chapter I
Chapter I
Management
Input Transformation
Process
Output
External Environment
The success and failure of a business
depends on various factors like physical
resources, financial resources,
technological, human resources, skills
and organisation.
Thus, success and survival of a firm,
depend on two sets of factors – internal
factors and external factors.
The business environment consists of a
number of factors which have different
types and degrees of influence on the
business.
Some factors have a favourable impact on
the business, some of the them are
adversely affected and some are neutral.
For example New Economic Policy –
Liberalisation, Privatisation &
Globalisation – generate employment
opportunities, new technology, increases in
income, importing raw-material etc.
Keith Davis – business environment as the
aggregate of all condition, events &
influences that surround and influence it.
Business Environment
Business
Organisation
Physical Human
Organisation
Resources Resource
Structure
Suppliers of
Com Inputs
peti
to mers
rs
u sto
C
Management
Pu
b li
i ers cs
anc
Fin
Marketing
intermediaries
1. Suppliers of inputs
An important factor in the external micro
environment of a firm is the suppliers of its inputs
such as raw-materials and components.
A smooth and effective working of a business
firm requires supply of inputs such as raw-
materials and power etc.
Energy input is an important input in the
manufacturing business.
If supply of raw materials are uncertain, then a
firm will have to keep a large stock of raw
material to continue its transformation process
uninterrupted.
2. Customers
The primary task of any business is to create and
sustain customers.
Without customers business is unthinkable.
The success of business depends upon how best it
monitors the sensitivity of customers.
3. Competitors
Business firms compete with each other not only for
sale of their product but also in other areas.
Generally, market forms of monopolistic
competition & differentiated oligopolies exist in
the real work.
This competition may be on the best of pricing of
their products.
Non- price competition – advertisement & sales
promotions
In USA, American firms faced a lot of
competition from Japanese firms producing
electronic and automobiles goods.
Similarly, the Indian firms are facing a lot of
competition from Chinese products.
4. Marketing intermediaries
Marketing intermediaries play an essential role of
selling and distributing its product to the final
buyers.
Marketing intermediaries includes agents and
merchants such as distribution firms,
wholesalers, retailers.
Marketing intermediaries are responsible for
stocking and transporting goods from their
production – ultimate buyers.
External Macro environment
Macro environment refers to the general
environment or remote environment within which
a business firm and forces in its micro
environment operate.
The external macro environment determines the
opportunities for a firm to exploit for promoting its
business
The macro environment has both positive and
negative aspects.
An important fact that macro environmental
forces is the uncontrollable by the
management of a firm.
Because of the uncontrollable nature of macro
forces a firm has to adjust or adapt itself to these
external forces.
Social & cultural Political & Legal
Economic
Environment Environment
Environment
Business
Organisation
1. Economic environment
2. Social and cultural environment
3. Political and Legal Environment
4. Technological Environment
5. Demographic Environment
6. Natural Environment
1. Economic Environment
Economic environment includes the type of
economic system that exists in the
economy and nature and structure –
capital, social & mixed economy.
The phases of business cycle – boom or
recission.
The fiscal, monetary and financial
policies of the government.
These economic policies of the govt
present both the opportunities as well as
the threats for the business firms.
Industrial Policy – 1948, 1956, 1980, 1990
& 1991.
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA).
Monopolistic & Restrictive Trade Policy
(MRTP)
Structural Adjustment Programme (SAPs)
– New Economic Policy 1991 –
Liberalisation, Privatisation and
Globalisation (LPG).
2. Social and Cultural Environment
The buying and consumption habits of the people,
their language, belief & values customs &
traditions, tastes and preference, education etc.
The socio-cultural fabric is an important environmental
factor that should be analyzed while formulating
business strategies.
For a business to be successful, its strategy should be
the one that is appropriate in the socio-cultural
environment.
Good corporate governance should be judged not
only by the productivity and profits earned by a
business firm but also by its social welfare
promoting activities.
3. Political and Legal Environment
Business are closely related to the govt.
The political philosophy of the govt wields a
great influence over business policies.
The industrial policies 1948, 1956, 1980,
1990 & 1991.
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act
(FERA)
Monopolistic & Restrictive Practices
(MRTP) Act
Structural Adjustment Programmes
(SAPs) – 1991.
4. Technological Environment
The nature of technology used for production
of goods & services is an important factor
responsible for the success of a business firm.
Technology consists of the type of machines
and processes available for use by a firm and
the way of doing things.
The improvement in technology raises total factor
productivity of a firm and reduces of cost of
output.
The use of a superior technology by a firm for its
transformation process determining its competitive
strength.
5. Demographic Environment
Demographic environment includes the size
of growth of population, life expectancy
at birth, rural and urban distribution of
population etc.
All these demographic features have an
important bearing on the functioning of
business firms.
The demographic environment affects
both the supply and demand sides of
business organisations.
6. Natural environment
Natural environment is the ultimate sources of
many inputs such as raw-materials, energy
which business firms use in their productive
activity.
The availability of natural resources in a region is
a basic factor in determining business activity.
Natural environment which includes
geographical as well as ecological factors –
minerals, oil resources, forest resources.
Fore example, the availability of minerals such as
iron, coal etc in a region influence the location of
certain industries in that region.
Global Business Environment
The global environment refers to those global
factors which are relevant to business such as
WTO principle & agreements, other
international conventions treaties, agreement
declaration & protocols etc.
Economic conditions in other countries may
affect the business.
International political factors – war, political
tension or uncertainties.
Developments in information &
communication technologies.
Certain developments such as a hike in the
crude oil price have global impact.
Modern business is very much influenced
by global or international environment.
The increasing importance of
liberalization, privatization &
globalization (LPG) has significant bearing
on business activities.
The establishment of GATT & later WTO
has profound impact on global business
environment.
The trade liberalization has offered many
opportunities for business firms.
If the firm will have to be efficient &
dynamic to survive the global competition.
International Business Environment
Value System
Mission & External Micro External Macro
Objectives Environment Environment
G
L Regional Integration
O
B Decline in Trade Barriers
A
L
Decline in Investment Barriers
I
S
A Increase in FDI
T
I
Changes in
O Technology
N
Growth of MNCs
1. Establishment of World Trade
Organisation
General Agreement on Trade and Tariff (GATT)
concluded in the Uruguay round – 15th
December, 1994.
Marrakesh Declaration – 15th April 1994
strengthen world trade through investment,
employment and income growth.
On 1st January 1995 – WTO was established.
The value of exports increased by 245% and
import increased by 1014% after establishment
of WTO during 1995 & 2006.
2. Regional Integration
Integration has developed as an alternative to
the policy of free trade.
It is an arrangement in which certain countries
having common economic interest and
political system decide to reduce or remove
tariff and other trade barriers among
themselves.
The two essential features are – free trade
among the member countries and imposition of
a common external tariff policy on non-
members.
The significant regional integrations includes –
European Union, NAFTA, ASEAN, SAARC,
EFTA, APEC, MERCOSUR & ANDEAN.
1. EU European Union– 1952 – West Germany,
France, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands & luxembourg.
2. NAFTA – North American Free Trade Agreement -
1989 - USA, Canada & Mexico.
3. ASEAN – The Association of South-east Asian
Nations – 1967 – Singapore, Brunei, Malaysia,
Philippines, Thailand & Indonesia.
4. SAARC – South Asian Association for Regional
Co-operation – 1985 – Indian, Bangladesh, Bhutan,
Pakistan, Maldives, Nepal & Srilanka.
5.EFTA – The European Free Trade Association
– 1960 – Austria, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, &
Switzerland.
6. APEC – Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation
– 1989 – 21 members – Canada, Chile, China,
China Republic, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan,
Republic Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New
Zealand & Peru.
7. MERCOSUR – 1991 – Argentina, Brazil,
Paraguay, Uruguay, Chile & Bolivia.
8. ANDEAN – 1993 – Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador,
Peru & Venezuela
3. Declining Trade Barriers
Another significant drivers of globalization is the
declining trade barriers.
Govts used to impose trade barriers like quotas
and tariffs in order to protect domestic business
from the external business.
Advanced countries after World War II agreed
to reduce tariffs in order to encourage free
flow of goods.
GATT in various rounds of negotiations
agreed to reduce the tariff rates.
Uruguay round negotiations contributed to
further reduction of trade barriers to cover
manufactured goods and services.
Declining Trade Barriers
1913 1950 1990 2000
USA 44% 14% 4.8% 3.9%
Japan 30% 18% 5.3% 3.9%
E
N Different National Groups
T
E
N Different National Groups
T
A 10 5
B 5 10
A = 10X or 5 Y = 15
B = 5X or 10 Y = 15
A has an absolute advantage in the
production of X i.e., 10X > 5Y.
B has an absolute advantage in the
production of Y i.e., 10Y > 5X
10 X of A 5 Y of A
_____________ > 1 > ______________
5 X of B 10 Y of B
After trade contract
Trade between the two countries will benefit both
if A specialise in the production of X & B in the
production of Y
Table: 2 Gain from trade
Production Production after Gains from trade
Country before trade trade
X Y X Y X Y
A 10 5 20 - +10 -5
B 5 10 - 20 -5 +10
Total 15 15 20 20 +5 +5
Production
The above table reveals that before trade both
countries produce only 15 units each of the two
commodities by applying one labour unit on each
commodity.
A were to specialise in producing commodity X
and use both units of labour on it, its total
production will be 20 units of X.
Similarly, if B were to specialise in the production
of Y alone, its total production will be 20 units of
Y.
The combined gain to both countries from trade
will be 5 units each of X and Y.
Chart: Absolute Cost Differences
Y
YB
OXA > OXB – country A
OYB > OXA - country B
Y Commodity
YA
O XB XA X
X Commodity
Before trade
Both countries produce only 15 units each
of the two commodity by using one unit on
each commodity.
After trade
A country were specialise in producing
commodity X with 20 units
B country were specialise in the production
of Y with 20 units of Y
The combined gain to both countries from
trade will be 5 units each of X & Y.
Criticism of the theory
1. No Absolute Advantage – One country should
be able to produce at least one product at a
comparatively low cost. But in reality most of the
developing countries do not have absolute
advantage of producing any product at the lowest
cost.
2. Country Size – countries vary in size. This
theory does not deal with country by country
differences in specialisation.
3. Variety of Resources – though these are
several resources like labour, technology and
natural resources, this theory deals with only
labour and ignores all other resources.
4. Transport cost – though the cost of
transportation plays a significant role in
international trade, this theory ignored this
aspect.
5. Large scale economies – large scale
economies reduces the cost of production &
form of part of the absolute advantage.
6. Absolute Advantage for many products
– some countries may have absolute
advantage for many products – for example
– Japan, USA, France & U.K. etc.
3. Theory of Comparative Cost Advantage
The classical theory of the international trade, also
known as the theory of comparative costs.
The Comparative Cost Theory was first
systamatically formulated by the English
economist David Ricardo in his Publication
entitled “Principles of Political Economy &
Taxation” – 1817.
It was later refined by J.S. Mill, Marshall,
Taussing & Others.
According to David Ricardo, it is not the absolute
but the comparative differences in cost that
determine trade relations between two countries.
Ricardo states that the countries could be
benefited by trade even when a country could
produce both the commodities at less labour
cost than the other country.
Production costs differ in countries because of
geographical condition, division of labour &
specialisation in production, climate
conditions, natural resources & efficiency of
labour of a country can produce one commodity
at a lower cost than the other.
One country has a comparative advantage in
the production of both the commodities while
other country has a comparative less
disadvantage in the production of one
commodity.
As long as the cost ratios differ, both countries
gain from trade, regardless of the fact that one of
the countries might have an absolute
disadvantage in the production of both the
commodities.
Therefore, when a country develop trade link with
some other country, it will export those
commodities in which their comparative
productions costs are low, & will import those
commodities in which its comparative
production cost are high.
This is the basis of international trade.
He assumed Portugal and England as the two
countries and Wine and Cloth as the two
commodities they produced.
Assumptions of the theory
1. There are only two countries – A & B or
England & Portugal.
2. They produce the same two commodities say,
Wine & Cloth – X & Y commodities.
3. There are similar tastes in both the countries
4. Labour is the only factor of production.
5. The supply of labour is unchanged.
6. All units of labour are homogeneous.
7. Prices of two commodities are determined by
labour cost.
Assumptions of the theory……
8. Commodities are produced under the law of
constant cost or returns.
9. Technological knowledge is unchanged.
10. Factors of production are perfectly mobile
within each country, but are perfectly
immobile between countries.
11. No transport costs are involved.
12. All the factors of production fully employed
in both the countries.
Explanation of the theory
Ricardo shows that trade is possible between
two countries when one country has an
absolute advantage in the production of both
commodities, but a comparative advantage in
the production of one commodity than in the
other
Table: 1 Man-Years of Labour Required for
producing one unit
Country Wine Cloth
England 120 100
Portugal 80 90
The production of a unit of Wine in England
requires 120 men for a year, while a unit of
Cloth requires 100 men for the same
period.
On the other hand, the production of the
same quantities of Wine & Cloth in Portugal
requires 80 & 90 men respectively.
Thus, England uses more labour than
Portugal in producing both wine & cloth.
In other words, the Portuguese labour is
more efficient than the English labour in
producing both the products.
So Portugal possesses an absolute advantage in
both wine and cloth.
But Portugal would benefit more by producing wine
& exporting it to England because it possess greater
comparative advantage in it (80/120 men).
On the other hand, England interest to specialise in
the production of cloth in which it has the least
comparative disadvantage.
This is because the cost of production of cloth in
England in less (100/90 men) as compared with
wine (120/80 men).
Thus, trade is beneficial for both the countries. The
comparative advantage position of both the country.
Diagrammatically representation
Y
PL – Production Possibility curve – Portugal
EG - Production Possibility curve – England
ER – Parllal to PL
P
E
Cloth
ER parllel to PL
O G R L X
Wine
PL is the production possibility curve of Portugal, & EG that
of England.
Portugal enjoys an absolute advantage in the production of
both Wine & Cloth over England.
It produces OL of Wine & OP of Cloth as against OG of
Wine & OE of Cloth produced by England.
But the slope ER (parallel to PL) reveals that Portugal has
greater comparative advantage in the production of Wine
because if it gives up the resources required to produce OE
of Cloth.
It can produce OR of Wine which is greater than OG of
Wine of England.
On the other hand, England had the least comparative
disadvantage in the production of OE Cloth.
Thus, Portugal will export OR of Wine to England in
exchange for OE of Cloth from her.
Domestic Exchange Ratio
England Portugal
Wine 120:100 cloth (6/5) Wine 80:90 Cloth (8/9)
1: 1.2 1: 0.89
O W2 (0.83) W1 B
Wine
The line C1W2 depicts the domestic
exchange ratio 1 unit of cloth = 0.83 unit
of Wine of England.
The line W1C2 that Portugal at the
domestic exchange ratio 1 unit of Wine
= 0.89 unit of Cloth.
The line C1W1 shows the exchange rate
of trade of 1 unit of cloth = 1 unit of wine
between the two countries.
At this exchange rate, England gain
W2W1 (0.17 unit) of wine while Portugal
gains C2C1 (0.11 unit) of cloth.
Criticisms of comparative cost analysis
1. Unrealistic Assumption of Labour cost
2. No similar tastes
3. Ignores transport costs
4. Factors are not perfectly mobile internally
5. Unrealistic two country & two commodities model
6. Assumption of free trade is not realistic
7. Assumption of full employment is not realistic
8. Ignores the role of technology
9. One sided theory
10. Complete specialisation is impossible.
4. Modern Theory of International Trade
The Modern Theory of International Trade
was advocated and developed by two
Swedish economists – Heckscher and Bertil
Ohlin.
Bertin Ohlin in his famous book “Inter-
regional & International Trade” - (1933)
criticised the classical theory of international
trade and formulated the General Equilibrium
of International trade.
Therefore, it is popularly known as Heckscher-
Ohlin theory of trade (H.O. Therom)
It is also known as Factor Endowment or
Factory Intensity Theory.
Factor Endowments means – land, capital,
natural resources, labour, climate etc.
For example – Argentina and Australia have
more land, India and Pakistan have an
abundant supply of labour & USA and U.K –
plenty of capital.
Hence, Argentina and Australia produce more
of land intensive goods, India and Pakistan –
more labour intensive goods & USA and UK –
produce more capital intensive goods.
According to Heckscher – Ohlin – differences
in the distribution of factor endowments are
responsible for differences in factor price and
therefore in the prices of goods and services
in different countries.
Trade results from differences in factor
endowments in different countries – leads to
differences in prices of commodities.
Some countries have much capital others
have much labour.
The theory says that countries that are rich in
capital will export capital intensive goods and
Countries that have much labour will export
labour-intensive goods.
Thus, the main cause of trade between
regions is the difference in prices of
commodities based on relative factor
endowments and factors prices.
Assumptions of the theory
1. It is 2 X 2 X 2 model - there are two countries
(A & B), two commodities (X & Y) & two factors
of production (capital & labour).
2. There is perfect competition in commodity as
well as factor markets.
3. There is full employment of resources.
4. Country A is capital abundant & country B is
rich in labour
5. There is perfect mobility of factors within
each region but internationally they are
immobile.
Assumptions of the theory…….
6. There are no transport cost.
7. There is free & unrestricted trade between
the two countries.
8. There are constant returns to scale in the
production of each commodity in each region.
9. There is no change in technological
knowledge.
10. Demand conditions are identical in both
the countries.
Explanation of H.O. Therom
Heckscher and Ohlin states that,
immediate cause of international trade
is the differences in relative commodity
prices caused by differences in relative
demand and supply factors as a result
of differences in factor endowments
between the two countries.
Fundamentally, the relative scarcity of
factors and unequally distributed
between countries leads to different
relative prices of commodities.
Production functions are different for
different commodities – capital intensive
production function and labour
intensive production function.
International trade responsible due to
differences in the relative prices of
commodities.
Two main causes responsible for diversity
of production conditions
1. Differences in terms of distribution of factors of
production
2. Differences in the ratio of participation of these
factors of production
Ohlin in his views – General Equilibrium
Theory of cost of the factors of production
depends on conditions of supply and
conditions of demand.
According to modern theory, the
immediate cause of international trade is
the differences in relative prices of
commodities in the two countries.
Differences in commodity prices between
the countries due to differences in
factors endowments of different
countries.
Relative differences in the relative factor
endowments of different countries and
different factor intensities for the
production of different commodities.
The theory is usually formulated in
terms of two factor model – labour and
capital are the two factor of production.
The proposition is that capital rich
countries export capital - intensive
goods &
Labour - rich countries export labour
intensive goods.
Factor abundance in terms of factor prices
Y
A
L
Capital
K1
A1
L1
O B B1 X
Labour
In the figure xx and yy is the isoquants for two
goods X and Y respectively.
There are two types of factors intensity –
commodity X and Y represents capital and
labour intensity.
There are two types of countries A & B. A is the
relatively capital abundant & B is labour
abundant countries.
The capital abundant country – A will produced
with OA of capital & OB of labour.
B country has labour abundant will produce OA1
of capital and OB2 of labour.
Superiority of H.O theory over
classical theory
1. International trade a special case
2. General equilibrium theory.
3. Two factors of production 2 X 2 X 2
4. Differences in factor supplies
5. Differences in factor endowments
6. Complete specialisation.
Criticism
1. 2 x 2 x2 model
2. Static theory
3. Factors are not homogeneous
4. Production techniques are homogeneous
5. Tastes & preference pattern not identical
6. No constant returns to scale
7. Transport costs influence trade
8. Unrealistic assumption of full employment &
perfect competition
9. Partial equilibrium analysis
10. Factor prices do not determine commodity
prices.
6. International Product Life Cycle Theory
International product life cycle theory developed by
Raymond Vernon & Lewis. T.Wells - 1966
PLC theory states that the development of a new
product moves through a cycle or a series of stages in
the course of its development.
And also get comparative advantage changes as it
moves through the cycle.
According to this theory of a new product is first
manufactured and marketed in a developed country
like - USA.
Because, certain favourable factors such as large
market, enterpreneurship, R & D etc.
The product is then exported to other developed
countries.
INNOVATION
Stage II Growth
INTERNATIONAL
PRODUCT LIFE
CYCLE
Stage III Maturity
Stage IV Decline
Fig 4.5
Product life cycle theory
Sales Volume
Time
Diagrammatically representation
The chart explains the possible international trade
patterns in the life cycle of a new product.
OX and OY axis measures time and sales volume
respectively.
The figure shows three sets of curves –The uppermost
set of curves relates to the innovating country, the
middle set to other advanced countries, and the lowest
set to the less developed countries.
The uppermost set of curves relating to the innovating
country – In the first stage, when the new product is
introduced, it is consumed in the domestic market, and
small portion exported to other advanced countries.
The middle set of curves shows that other
advanced countries having started the
production of the new product continue to
increase its production upto the maturing
product stage and then become net exporters
of the product in the standardised product
stage.
The lowest set of curves relating to less
developed countries shows that such
countries continue to import the product
throughout the three product stages. It is,
however, in the maturing product stage that
they start its production and become its net
exporters very late in the last stage when the
product actually becomes old in advanced
countries.
Theories of International Investment
1.Theory of Capital Movement
2.Market Imperfections Theory
3.Internationalisation Theory
4.Appropriability Theory
5.Location Specific Advantage Theory
6.International Product Life Cycle Theory
7.Eclectic Theory
1. Theory of Capital Movement
• The classical or earliest theoreticians, developed
theory of capital movement of international
investment.
• The classical or tradition, assumes that, the
existence of a perfectly competitive market.
• Foreign investment in the form factor movement
to take advantage of the differential profit.
• Charles Kindleberger, Stated that, under perfect
competition, foreign direct investment would not
occur & that would be unlikely to occusing world
where in the conditions were even approximately
competitive.
2. Market Imperfections Theory
The market imperfections theory of foreign
investment was advocated by Stephen in 1960,
under monopolistic advantage theory.
According to this theory, foreign direct
investment occurred largely in oligopolistic
industries rather than industries operating
under near perfect competition.
Hymer, suggested that, decision of firm to invest
in foreign markets was based on certain
advantages the firm possessed over the local
firms (foreign country).
Economies of scale, superior technology,
production, marketing & finance.
3. Internationalisation Theory
According to the internationalisation theory
which is an extension of the market
imperfections theory.
Foreign investment results from the decision of a
firm to internalise the firm specific advantage like
a superior knowledge – production, marketing,
HRM.
Internationalisation include formal ways &
informal ways.
Formal ways – patents & copy rights
Informal ways – Secrecy & family networks
4. Appropriability Theory
According to the Appropriability Theory, a
firm should be able to appropriate the
benefits resulting from a technology, it has
generated.
If this condition is not satisfied, the firm
would not be able to bear the cost of
technology generation & therefore, would
have no incentive for Research &
Development (R & D)..
MNCs tend to specialise in developing new
technologies which are transmitted
efficiently through their internal channels.
5. Location Specific Advantage Theory
The Location Specific Advantage Theory suggests
that foreign investment is pulled by certain location
specific advantages.
According to Hood & Young, there are four factors
which are pertinent to the location specific theory.
They are –
1. Labour Cost
2. Marketing factors – market size, market growth, stages of
development & local competition.
3. Trade barriers
4. Government policy.
However, there are also other factors like cultural
factors which influence foreign investment.
Further it is the total cost & not labour cost alone,
that is important