Derivatives 1
Derivatives 1
An Understanding Of
Financial Derivatives
Gaurav Dhingra
< E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y >
◆ Derivative products initially emerged tives should be considered for inclusion
as hedging devices against fluctuations in any organisation’s risk-control arse-
in commodity prices. These offer organ- nal. The most common financial deriva-
isations the opportunity to break finan- tive products can be classified as for-
cial risks into smaller components to wards, futures, options and swaps.
best meet specific risk management Derivatives also have a darker side.
objectives. A derivative is an instrument Without a clearly defined risk manage-
where payoffs are derived from a more ment strategy, excessive use of financial
primitive or fundamental good. A finan- derivatives can cause serious losses and
cial derivative is a financial instrument, can threaten the firm’s long-term objec-
whose payoffs depend on another finan- tives. Derivatives being an important risk
cial instrument underlying the transac- management tool necessitate its users to
tion. Derivatives offer benefits such as understand the intended function and
risk management and efficiency in trad- the safety precautions before being put to
ing etc. to its users. Financial deriva- use for the benefit of the society at large.
976
THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT MARCH 2004
THEME
978
THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT MARCH 2004
THEME
maturity date (as determined by the rules of the exchange products attractive; sometimes the products are
for the month of December) the price of the equity stock designed to reflect a corporate treasurer’s view on poten-
rises to Rs. 120 Mr. ‘L’ will receive Rs. 20 per share and tial future movements in particular market variables;
otherwise if the price of the share falls to Rs. 90 Mr. ‘L’ occasionally an exotic product is designed by an invest-
will pay Rs. 10 per share. ment bank to appear more attractive than it is to an
unwary corporate treasurer.”
If market price falls to Rs. 90 John C. Hull
Rs. 10 per share Illustration: Mr. ‘L’ pays $ 2,000 to buy a ‘December
103’ call option on a $ 100,000 US Treasury bond at an
L S exercise price of $ 103. If the price rises above $ 103, Mr.
‘L’ will gain from the difference and if the price falls
If market price rises to Rs. 120 below $ 103, the maximum amount which Mr. ‘L’ may
Rs. 20 per share lose is the amount of premium paid.
As compared to a forward contract the futures are
normally settled only by the difference between the
strike price and the market price as on maturity date. L Payments depending S
on the price at maturity date
980
THE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT MARCH 2004
THEME
Let us take two cases: spective financial derivatives offer free trading of indi-
1) LIBOR = 10% vidual risk components.
In this case Mr. ‘A’ will pay to Mr. ‘X’ at the rate of As there is always an other side of the coin, deriva-
12%. Mr. ‘B’ will pay to Mr. ‘A’ at the rate of 3%. tives also have a darker side.
Hence the net liability of Mr. ‘A’ is 9% only. Organisations like Procter &
2) LIBOR = 5% Gamble, Long Term Capital
In this case Mr. ‘A’ will pay to Mr. ‘X’ at the rate of 7% Management, Barings Bank, etc.
and Mr. ‘A’ will pay to Mr. ‘B’ at the rate of 2%. Hence experienced huge losses from
the net liability of Mr. ‘A’ remains the same at 9%. derivatives trading in the early
1990’s. Barings Bank lost around
$1 billion just because one trader whose job was to carry
X out low risk arbitrage switched from being an arbitrageur
to a speculator. The hedge fund named Long Term
Capital Management lost about $4 billion in 1998. The
F L
treasury department of Procter & Gamble lost about $90
L I
million trading highly exotic interest rate derivatives con-
O B
tracts. These losses warn the users against excessive use
A O
of financial derivatives. Without a clearly defined risk
T R
management strategy, excessive use of financial deriva-
I +
tives can be risky. They can cause serious losses and can
N 2%
threaten the firm’s long-term objectives. Hence it is
G
important that users of derivatives fully understand the
FLOATING LIBOR + 2% complexity of financial derivative contracts and accom-
B panying risks. Derivatives being an important risk man-
A
agement tool necessitate its users to understand the
FIXED 9% intended function and the safety precautions before
being put to use. The use of derivatives should be inte-
Swaps are not traded on organized exchanges and grated into an organisation’s overall risk-management
have an informal market among the dealers. As distin- strategy and should be in harmony with its objectives.
guished from futures and options, swaps market affords Hence the users of derivatives can use these instruments
privacy that may not be there in exchange trading. The for their benefit and for the benefit of the society at large.
inherent limitations of a swaps market may be summa-
rized as follows; first, a party has to find a counter party
willing to take the opposite side of the transaction, sec-
ond, a swap agreement, being between two counter par- REFERENCES
ties cannot be altered or terminated early without the ● Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives – John C. Hull
agreement of both the parties, third, parties to the swap ● Derivatives Markets – Robert L. McDonald
must be certain of the creditworthiness of the counter
● Futures, Options, & Swaps – Robert W. Kolb
party as the risk of counter party default is always there.
● www.nseindia.com