Chapter 18 Powerpoint
Chapter 18 Powerpoint
Energy
Use in
Building,
Btu/ft2-yr
better
Technology
Building energy Codes are not as
efficient as the best Technology
Energy
Use in
Building,
Btu/ft2-yr
better
Technology Codes
But the average Market building is
more efficient than code
Energy
Use in
Building,
Btu/ft2-yr
better
Energy
Use in
Building,
Btu/ft2-yr
better
Energy
Use in
Building,
Btu/ft2-yr
better
Technology
…and Building Technologies improve
over time
Energy
1970s
Use in
Building,
1980s
Btu/ft2-yr
1990s
2000s
better
Technology
Building Guidelines respond to Technology
1970s
Energy
1970s 1980s
Use in
Building,
1980s 1990s
Btu/ft2-yr
1990s 2000s
2000s
better
Technology Guidelines
…but there is a lag time
Lag time,
Technology
to Guideline
1970s
Energy
1970s 1980s
Use in
Building,
1980s 1990s
Btu/ft2-yr
1990s 2000s
2000s
better
Technology Guidelines
Technology and Guidelines affect the
average building on the Market
1970s
1970s 1980s
Energy
1970s 1980s 1990s
Use in
Building,
1980s 1990s 2000s
Btu/ft2-yr
1990s 2000s
2000s
better
Energy
1970s 1980s 1990s
Use in
Building,
1980s 1990s 2000s
Btu/ft2-yr
1990s 2000s
2000s
better
1990s 2000s
2000s
better
1990s 2000s
2000s
better
50
Energy/
Environment
Impact 40 Technology
Indicator, Ratings
e.g., 30 Market
Btu/ft -y
2
Codes
CO2/ft2-y 20
(lower the better)
10
0
1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s
UK Building Efficiency Standards
have improved over time
Improvements in Model Codes in US
from 1983 to 2003 for heating
Improvements in Model Codes in US
from 1983 to 2003 for cooling
…for both heating and cooling
Where are we today?
Most codes and standards have improved and
reflect: “Envelope, Infiltration, HVAC”
1,800
1,600 20
1,400
$ 1,270
Refrigerator
1,200 Size (cubic ft) 15
1,000
800 10
600
Energy Use per Unit
(kWh/Year)
400 Refrigerator Price $ 462 5
in 1983 $
200
0 0
1947 1952 1957 1962 1967 1972 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002
Source: Art Rosenfeld, David Goldstein
Better Consumer Information:
Appliance and Equipment Labeling
Lighting
Lighting Efficiency and Quality
Lighting efficacy = lumens/watt (lm/w)
where lumen = measure of luminous flux or brightness
1 lumen/ft2 = 1 foot-candle
Low-CRI = 10-69
Med-CRI = 70-79
High-CRI = 80-89
Very High-CRI = 90-100
Toward LED Lighting?
California Title 24 Code
Title 24 Building Envelope, HVAC
EPA
ENERGY
STAR Homes
2005 Version:
“Envelope,
Infiltration, HVAC”
2006 Version:
“Whole
Building”
LEED-H (Homes): “Whole Building”
Points
Location and Linkages 10
Sustainable Sites 14
Water Efficiency 12
Indoor Air Quality 14
Materials and Resources 24
Energy and Atmosphere 29
1 ENERGY STAR Home Req+16
2 Insulation Req+1
3 Air Infiltration Req+3
4 Windows Req+3
5 Duct Tightness Req+3
6 Space Heating and Cooling HVAC Req+4
7 Water Heating 3+3
8 Lighting Energy Efficient 1+1
9 Appliances 2+1
10 Renewable Electric Generation System 6
11 Non-HCFC Refrigerant 1
Homeowner Awareness 1
Innovation and Design Process 4
Project Maximum Points: 108
Certified 30-49 pts; Silver 50-69 pts; Gold 70-89 pts; Platinum 90-108 pts
Where are we headed?
“Whole Building Life Cycle”: 2010?
Heating + AC + appliances + lighting operating
energy + environmental/health impacts + life-
cycle embodied energy (“cradle-to-grave”)
Certified 30-49 pts; Silver 50-69 pts; Gold 70-89 pts; Platinum 90-108 pts
“Whole Community Energy”
“Whole Building Life Cycle” plus….
… on-site energy generation
… site design
… neighborhood design
… regional connectivity
Efficiency improvements
LEED-ND – Neighborhood Development
Title # Credits Points % of total
Location Efficiency 7 28 25%
Reduced Automobile Dependence 2 to 6
Environmental Preservation 13 11%
Compact, Complete, & Connected Neighborhoods 22 42 37%
Compact Development 1 to 5
Transit-Oriented Compactness 1
Diversity of Uses 1 to 3
Comprehensively Designed Walkable Streets 2
Superior Pedestrian Experience 1 to 2
Transit Amenities 1
Access to Nearby Communities 1
Resource Efficiency 17 25 22%
Certified Green Building 1 to 5
Energy Efficiency in Buildings 1 to 3
Heat Island Reduction 1
Infrastructure Energy Efficiency 1
On-Site Power Generation 1
On-Site Renewable Energy Sources 1
Reuse of Materials 1
Recycled Content 1
Regionally Provided Materials 1
Construction Waste Management 1
Other 2 6
TOTAL 48 114 100%