"Thosewhosayitcannotbedoneshouldnotinterferewiththoseofuswhoaredoingit"S.

Hickman
Home Againstthe GrainPress LossofLiberty Revealed Working TommyC. LividLeigh Boilin'Ed D.Tom TheInformer Knowledgeis Freedom Privacy Links CourtCase ContactUs

TheInformer FICTIONOFLAW
WellPeople,It'sabouttimetowakeupandsmellthe coffee.WhatIamabouttogiveyouisnothingbut thetruthfromthecourtsandlawsoftheUnited States.Whenyouknowwhattolookforyouwillfind itintheoddestplaces.Placesthattheordinaryman wouldnotexpecttofindit.Everyonetalksabout governmentbeingacorporationascitedin28USC 3002(15).Everyonecomplainswhentakentocourt whereisthecontract.Allpeoplearguethese contracts,whetherimplied,adhesionorwhatever.So thereisalotincommonwithallthearguments.Of coursewhenyougointocourtyoumostalwayslose evenwhenbringinginthelaw,regulationsandcourt casesthatyoufeelsupportsyourposition. ForyearsnowIhavebeentryingtomakepeople understandthatcitizenship,ofwhatevergovernment nature,iswhatsucksyouintobeingataxpayer,or requiringyoutogetwhateverlicenseisneededto surviveandbeingcontrolledbygovernment (corporation).Howthegovernmentoperatesisby FictionofLaw.Afictionoflawisstatedfrom LectricLawLibraryonthenetasfollows: Theassumptionthatacertainthingistrue,andwhichgivestoapersonorthingaquality whichisnotnaturaltoit,andconsequentlyestablishes,acertaindisposition,which, withoutthefiction,wouldberepugnanttoreasonandtotruth.Itisanorderofthings whichdoesnotexist,butwhichthelawprescribesorauthorizes.Itdiffersfrom presumptionbecauseitestablishesastrue,somethingwhichisfalsewhereaspresumption suppliestheproofofsomethingtrue. Thelawneverfeignswhatisimpossible.Fictionislikeartitimitatesnature,butnever disfiguresit.Itaidstruth,butitoughtnevertodestroyit.Itmaywellsupposethatwhat waspossible,butwhichdoesnotexistbutitwillneverfeignthatwhatwasimpossible actuallyis. FictionswereinventedbytheRomanpraetorswho,notpossessingthepowerto abrogatethelaw,wereneverthelesswillingtoderogatefromitunderthepretenseof doingequity.Fictionistheresourceofweaknesswhich,inordertoobtainitsobject, assumesasafactwhatisknowntobecontrarytotruth:whenthelegislatordesiresto accomplishhisobject,heneednotfeign,hecommands.Fictionsoflawowetheirorigin tothelegislativeusurpationsofthebench. Itissaidthateveryfictionmustbeframedaccordingtotherulesoflaw,andthatevery legalfictionmusthaveequityforitsobject.Topreventtheirevileffects,theyarenot allowedtobecarriedfurtherthanthereasonswhichintroducedthemnecessarilyrequire. Thelawaboundsinfictions.Thatanestateisinabeyancethedoctrineofremitter,by whichapartywhohasbeendisseisedofhisfreeholdandafterwardsacquiresadefective title,isremittedtohisformergoodtitlethatonethingdonetoday,isconsideredasdone ataprecedingtimebythedoctrineofrelationthatbecauseonethingisproved,another shallbepresumedtobetrue,whichisthecaseinallpresumptionsthattheheir,executor, andadministratorstandbyrepresentationintheplaceofthedeceasedareallfictionsof law."OurvariousintroductionofJohnDoeandRichardRoeoursolemnprocessupon disseisinbyHughHuntourcasuallylosingandfindingaship(whichneverwasinEurope) intheparishofSt.MaryLeBow,inthewardofCheapourtryingthevalidityofawillby animaginarywageroffivepoundsourimaginingandcompassingtheking'sdeath,by givinginformationwhichmaydefeatanattackuponanenemy'ssettlementinthe antipodesourchargeofpickingapocketorforgingabillwithforceandarmsof neglectingtorepairabridge,againstthepeaceoftheking,hiscrownanddignityare circumstances,which,lookedatbythemselves,wouldconveyanimpressionofnovery

19942009 AgainsttheGrain

disseisinbyHughHuntourcasuallylosingandfindingaship(whichneverwasinEurope) intheparishofSt.MaryLeBow,inthewardofCheapourtryingthevalidityofawillby animaginarywageroffivepoundsourimaginingandcompassingtheking'sdeath,by givinginformationwhichmaydefeatanattackuponanenemy'ssettlementinthe antipodesourchargeofpickingapocketorforgingabillwithforceandarmsof neglectingtorepairabridge,againstthepeaceoftheking,hiscrownanddignityare circumstances,which,lookedatbythemselves,wouldconveyanimpressionofnovery favorablenature,withrespecttothewisdomofourjurisprudence." NownoticethatAssumptionisthewordusedto describehowfictionoperates.Thewordpresumption istheopposite,seeopeningparagraphforthis sentence" Itdiffersfrompresumptionbecauseit establishesastrue,somethingwhichisfalse whereaspresumptionsuppliestheproofofsomething true." NowletsusethismaterialfromBlack's3rdEditionLawbookanda casetowit: Fiction.DerivedfromFictioinRomanLaw,afictionisdefinedasafalseavermentonthe partofthePlaintiffwhichthedefendantisnotallowedtotraverse,theobjectbeingtogive thecourtjurisdiction.Black'sLawDictionary3rdEd.(1969)Pg.468Inthecaseof "WillfulfailuretoFile,"thePlaintiffandcourtinventsthe"fiction"thatdefendantisa "taxpayer",A.K.A."Person."Motionsandbriefswhichrelyonpreceptsoflawwill thereafterbedeniedorfoundfrivolous.ThispointwasmadeclearinRobertsv. Commissioner,176F2d221,225(9C.A.,1949) Nowyouknowwhyallyourargumentsarefrivolous. Youareafictionandfictionshavenoconstitutional protectionfromencroachmentonyourunalienable rights.Whatisthisfictionthatyouare?Thisisa listofwordsorphrasesthatdescribeafiction, remembering"fiction"isartificialincharacter, PERSON,RESIDENT,U.S.CITIZEN,STATECITIZEN,and INDIVIDUAL. Iamusingthefullcaseasitissoimportant,not onlyforthefactthatIamwritingonFictionof Law,butotherparametersthatIhavewrittenlong agoandthatpeoplepoohpooheditasridiculousas itdealtwithadmiralty.Ihadshowedwhereboth revenueanddrivingwasmaritimeinnatureandalmost everyonesaidIwaswayoffbaseeventhoughIhad shown,throughBenedictonAdmiralty,thatlicensing andregisteringyourcarwasinthenatureof maritime.Soallrevenuesituations,Incometaxand Drivingareintheadmiraltyjurisdictionbecauseof themaritimenature.Thatiswhythecourtswillnot tellyouthenatureismaritimeandthecauseisthat youhaveviolatedyourpromisetoperformunder fictionoflaw.Nowyouaregoingtosay,ohnothe Informerisgoingoffthedeependagain.Wellhear thesecasesoutandtheFictionofLawpremise.Take offtheblindersyouhavehadonsolongandusethe brainthattheLordgaveyou.TheLorddidsaythat notallthathaveeyestoseewillseeand, therefore,ifyoudonotseeyouwillforeverbe doomedtotheexistenceyouhave.Iamgoingtobold, inthecase,toshowhowmaritimeisusedwhenever youcarrypassengersforhire,beitboat,plane, wagon,scooter,rickshaworcar.Donotlosesightof thefactthatyouareafictionandhavecontracted withgovernmentwhenreadingthiscase.Ohbytheway gotoFindLawandsearchforFictionofLawandhave agoodtimereading. U.S.SupremeCourt ARCHAWSKIv.HANIOTI,350U.S.532(1956) 350U.S.532 ARCHAWSKIETAL.v.HANIOTI. CERTIORARITOTHEUNITEDSTATESCOURTOFAPPEALSFORTHE SECONDCIRCUIT. No.351. ArguedMarch5,1956. DecidedApril9,1956. Alibelinadmiraltyallegedthatpetitionerspaidmoneystorespondentfortransportation toEuropeonrespondent'svessel,andthatrespondentbreachedthecontractby abandonmentofthevoyage.Thelibelfurtherallegedthatrespondentwrongfully appropriatedthepassagemoneytohisownuseandcommittedotherfraudulentacts. Held:Thecauseofactionalleged

ArguedMarch5,1956. DecidedApril9,1956. Alibelinadmiraltyallegedthatpetitionerspaidmoneystorespondentfortransportation toEuropeonrespondent'svessel,andthatrespondentbreachedthecontractby abandonmentofthevoyage.Thelibelfurtherallegedthatrespondentwrongfully appropriatedthepassagemoneytohisownuseandcommittedotherfraudulentacts. Held:Thecauseofactionalleged waswithintheadmiraltyjurisdictionoftheFederalDistrictCourt.Pp.532536. (a)Theessentialcharacterofthelibelasaclaimforbreachofamaritimecontractwas notalteredbytheallegationsofwrongfulnessandfraud.Pp.534535. (b)Solongastheclaimassertedarisesoutofamaritimecontract,theadmiraltycourt hasjurisdictionoverit.P.535. (c)Admiraltyhasjurisdictionevenwherealibelreadslikeindebitatusassumpsitat commonlaw,providedthattheunjustenrichmentaroseoutofthebreachofamaritime contract.Pp.535536. 223F.2d406,reversedandremanded. HarryD.Grahamarguedthecauseandfiledabriefforpetitioners. IsraelConvisserarguedthecauseandfiledabriefforrespondent. MR.JUSTICEDOUGLASdeliveredtheopinionoftheCourt. Thesolequestioninthecaseiswhetherthecauseofactionallegedcomeswithinthe admiraltyjurisdictionoftheDistrictCourt.TheDistrictCourtheldthatthiswasanaction onamaritimecontract,withintheadmiraltyjurisdiction,129F.Supp.410.TheCourtof Appealsreversed,holdingthatthesuitwasinthenatureofthe[350U.S.532, 533]oldcommonlawindebitatusassumpsitformoneyhadandreceived,based uponthewrongfulwithholdingofmoney.223 F.2d406.Thecaseishereonapetitionforcertiorariwhichwegranted,350U.S.872, becauseoftheseemingconflictofthatrulingwithKraussBros.Co.v.DimonS.S. Corp.,290U.S.117,124.1 Thelibelallegesthatrespondent,doingbusinessinhisownandinvarioustradenames, ownedandcontrolledapassengervessel,knownastheCityofAthens,andheldout thatvesselasacommoncarrierofpassengersforhire,andthatpetitionerspaid moneysforpassageuponthevessel,scheduledforJuly15,1947,toEurope.Acontract forthetransportationofpassengersisamaritimecontractwithinadmiralty jurisdiction.2TheMosesTaylor,4Wall.411.Theallegationssofarmentionedare plainlysufficienttoestablishsuchacontract.Thelibelgoesontoallegeabreachof thatcontractthroughanabandonmentofthevoyage.Ifthiswereall,itwouldbeplainthat petitionersstatedaclaimforbreachofamaritimecontract.Butthelibelfurtheralleges thatthesumspaidbypetitionersaspassagemoneywere"wrongfullyand deliberately"appliedbyrespondenttohisownuseandbenefit"inrecklessdisregardof hisobligationstorefund[350U.S.532,534]thesame"andthatrespondent"has secretedhimselfawayandmanipulatedhisassets...forthepurposeofdefrauding" petitioners.Thenfollowallegationsofcertainfraudulentactsandtransactions. Theallegationsofwrongfulnessandfrauddonotaltertheessentialcharacterofthelibel. Fortheancientadmiraltyteachingisthat,"Therulesofpleadingintheadmiraltyare exceedinglysimpleandfreefromtechnicalrequirements."DupontdeNemours&Co.v. Vance,19How.162,171172.Andsee2Benedict,AmericanAdmiralty(6thed. 1940),223,237.Thoughtheseparticularallegationsofthelibelsoundinfraudorinthe wrongfulwithholdingofmoneys,itisplaininthecontextthattheobligationtopaythe moneysarosebecauseofabreachofthecontracttotransportpassengers. Lawyersspeakoftheobligationintermsofindebitatusassumpsit,aconcept whosetortuousdevelopmentgaveexpressionto"theethicalcharacterofthelaw."See Ames.TheHistoryofAssumpsit,2Harv.L.Rev.1,53,58(1888).AsMr.Justice Holmesonceputit,"Anobligationtopaymoneygenerallyisenforcedbyanactionof assumpsitandtothatextentisreferredtoacontracteventhoughitbeoneexisting onlyby fictionoflaw ."Thomasv.Matthiessen,232U.S.221,235. IHAVEINCLUDEDAPORTIONOFTHISCASEAFTERTHISONE, THEINFORMER. Thefictionsometimesdistortedthelaw.Alineofauthoritiesemergedtotheeffectthat admiraltyhadnojurisdictiontograntreliefinsuchcases"becausetheimpliedpromiseto repaythemoneyswhichcannotingoodconscienceberetainednecessarytosupport theactionformoneyhadandreceivedisnotamaritimecontract."3UnitedTransp.& L.Co.v.NewYork &B.T.Line,185F.386,391.Yetthatdutytopayisoftenreferable,[350U.S. 532,535]ashere,tothebreachofamaritimecontract.AsMr.JusticeStonesaidin KraussBros.Co.v.DimonS.S.Corp.,supra,at124:

repaythemoneyswhichcannotingoodconscienceberetainednecessarytosupport theactionformoneyhadandreceivedisnotamaritimecontract."3UnitedTransp.& L.Co.v.NewYork &B.T.Line,185F.386,391.Yetthatdutytopayisoftenreferable,[350U.S. 532,535]ashere,tothebreachofamaritimecontract.AsMr.JusticeStonesaidin KraussBros.Co.v.DimonS.S.Corp.,supra,at124: "...Evenunderthecommonlawformofactionformoneyhadandreceived therecouldbenorecoverywithoutproofofthebreachofthecontractinvolvedin demandingthepayment,andthebasisofrecoverythere,asinadmiralty,isthe violationofsometermofthecontractofaffreightment,whetherbyfailureto carryorbyexactionoffreightwhichthecontractdidnotauthorize." Thetruthisthatinacasesuchasthepresentonethereisneitheranactualpromiseto repaythepassagemoneysnorasecondcontract.Theproblemistopreventunjust enrichmentfromamaritimecontract.SeeMorrison,TheRemedialPowersofthe Admiralty,43YaleL.J.1.27(1933).Acourtthatpreventsamaritimecontractfrom beingexploitedinthatwaydoesnot reachbeyondthedomainofmaritimeaffairs.Weconcludethat,solongastheclaim assertedarisesoutofamaritimecontract,theadmiraltycourthasjurisdictionoverit. Thephilosophyofindebitatusassumpsitis,indeed,notwhollyforeigntoadmiralty. Analogousconceptionsofrightsbasedonquasicontractarefoundinadmiralty.One whosavespropertyatseahastherighttoanawardofsalvage,regardlessofany agreementbetweenhimandtheowner.SeeMasonv.ShipBlaireau,2Cranch240,266 TheSabine,101U.S.384,3901Benedict,supra,117etseq.Likewise,wherecargois jettisoned,theownerbecomesentitledtoacontributioningeneralaveragefromthe ownersofothercargowhichwassavedwithouttheaidofanyagreement.SeeBarnardv. Adams,10How.270,303304StarofHope,9Wall.203,2282301Benedict, supra,98.Otherexamplescouldbegiven.SeeChandler,QuasiContractualRelief[350 U.S.532,536]inAdmiralty,27Mich.L.Rev.23(1928).Rightswhichadmiralty recognizesasservingtheendsofjusticeareoftenindistinguishablefromordinaryquasi contractualrightscreatedtopreventunjustenrichment.Howfartheconceptofquasi contractsmaybeappliedinadmiraltyitisunnecessarytodecide.Itissufficientthisdayto holdthatadmiraltyhasjurisdiction,evenwherethelibelreadslikeindebitatusassumpsitat commonlaw,providedthattheunjustenrichmentaroseasaresultofthebreachofa maritimecontract.Suchisthecasehere. ThejudgmentisreversedandthecaseisremandedtotheCourtofAppealsfor proceedingsinconformitywiththisopinion. Reversedandremanded. Footnotes [Footnote1]ThereisalsoanapparentconflictwithSwordLinev.UnitedStates,228 F.2d344,346,decided,afterwegrantedcertiorari,byadifferentpaneloftheSecond Circuitfromtheonewhichsatintheinstantcase. [Footnote2]TheCourtinNewJerseySteamNavigationCompanyv.Merchants'Bank, 6How.344,392,statedthatindeterminingadmiraltyjurisdictiontheinquiryis"intothe natureandsubjectmatterofthecontract,whetheritwasamaritimecontract,andthe serviceamaritimeservice,tobeperformeduponthesea,oruponwaterswithintheebb andflowofthe tide.And,again,whethertheservicewastobesubstantiallyperformeduponthesea,or tidewaters,althoughithadcommencedandhadterminatedbeyondthereachofthetide ifitwas,thenjurisdictionhasalwaysbeenmaintained." [Footnote3]AndseeIsraelv.Moore&McCormackCo.,295F.919HomeIns.Co. v.Merchants'Transp.Co.,16F.2d372Silvav.BankersCommercialCorp.,163F.2d 602.[350U.S.532,537] Thefollowingisthecasecitedabovethatbears importanceonthefictionandhowyouarecompelled topayanincometaxforyourcontractwiththe government.Itisbasedonalevelofadollaramount whichisthepossessionanduseofafederalReserve Notewhichisadebtyouhadandreceivedina transfertowhichyouaretopaybackaportionfor theuseofthenotes.Thisisbasedonthepromiseto followalltherulesandregsasacitizenof, residenttherein ofthecontract,byimpliedconsent foracceptingtheartificialcharacterofindividual, whichisaworddefinitiondefiningpersoninstatute thatisthesubjectofliability.Whenreadingthe followingreplace"stockholder"/"members"with citizen/person/residentand"corporation"withState orUnitedStates. Thomasv.Matthiessen,232U.S.221,235. Thereremainsonlythequestionwhethertheliabilityisofakindthatwillbeenforced

whichisaworddefinitiondefiningpersoninstatute thatisthesubjectofliability.Whenreadingthe followingreplace"stockholder"/"members"with citizen/person/residentand"corporation"withState orUnitedStates. Thomasv.Matthiessen,232U.S.221,235. Thereremainsonlythequestionwhethertheliabilityisofakindthatwillbeenforced outsideoftheCaliforniacourts.Analysisonthispointoftenisblurredbythevague statementthattheliabilityis'contractual.'Anobligationtopaymoneygenerallyis enforcedbyanactionofassumpsit,andtothatextentisreferredtoacontract, eventhoughitbeoneexistingonlyby fictionoflaw .Butsuchobligations whenimposeduponthemembersofacorporationmayveryverylargely.The incorporationmaycreateacharteredpartnershipthemembersofwhichareprimary contractors,oritmaygonofartherthantoimposeapenaltyoragain,itmaycreatea secondaryremedyforadebttreatedasthatofthecorporationalone,liketherightto attachthecorporation'srealestateortheliabilitymaybeinseparablefromthelocal procedureorthelawmaybesoambiguousastoleaveitdoubtfulwhethertheliabilityis matterofremedy,andlocal,orcreatesacontractonthepartofthemembersthat willgowiththemwherevertheyarefoundMcClainev.Rankin,197U.S.154,161 49L.ed.702,705,25Sup.Ct.Rep.410,3Ann.Cas.500Christopherv.Norvell, 201U.S.216,225,226S.,50L.ed.732,736,26Sup.Ct.Rep.502,5Ann.Cas. 740.Inthepresentcasewethinkthattherecanbenodoubtofthemeaningofthe Californiastatute.Itreads:'Eachstockholderofacorporationisindividuallyand personallyliableforsuchproportionofitsdebtsandliabilities,'etc.,aswehave stated,andsupposestheactionagainsthimtobebrought'uponsuchdebt.'Civil Code,322.Thismeansthatbyforceofthestatute,ifthecorporationincursadebt withinthejuris[232U.S.221,236]diction,thestockholderisapartytoit,and joinsinthecontractintheproportionofhisshares. Now,Ihopeyouarereadytounderstandwhatyouhave read.Allstatutesarewrittenforpersons, residents,individualsandarepremisedononething, citizenship.Citizenshipmeansyouareamemberof thecorporatebodypoliticofthestateorfederal government.Sogoaheadandcall yourselfacitizen ofsoandsostateandyouimmediatelybecomea "stockholder"ofthatStateandassumeallitsdebts. PlusthefactthattheStateyouclaimcitizenshipin isa"politicalsubdivision"oftheUnitedStates. SinceallStatesarecorporationsandhavejoinedthe parentcorporation,TheUnitedStates,youarebound toacontractasstatedinthecasesabove.Nowyou haveASSUMEDthecharacterofaFICTIONOFLAW, namelythatofaperson, towhichallstatutesapply. NowinthedefinitionofpersonthewordINDIVIDUAL describespersonin26USC7701(a)(1).Inmybooks, TheNewHistoryofAmericaandWhichOneAreYou.I usedtwocaseswhereintheJudgesstatedthatthe defendantsdidnotdisputethattheywereNOTUnited Statescitizenssotheyweretaxpayers.Whypeople didnotpickuponthisisbecausethereisvery littlelogicalthinkingmindsanymoretodeducethe obvious. Hereishowyoubecomepartofacontract,thatall talkaboutexisting,butnoonecanfigureoutwhere thiscontractis,topromisetopaythedebtofthe StateandUnitedStates.Astheabovecasesstates, itiswhereevertheperson(stockholder/member)is thatthejurisdictionfollows.ThatiswhytheIRS cangointoaStatecontrarytowhatyouallbelieve thattheycannot.Ohyestheycan,andyoudiditto yourselfwhenusingafictionoflawandtheycame rightbackonthatfictionoflawandnailedyouwith yourownactionswhichyoucannotshakenomatterhow hardyoutry.TheyevenwenttoMexicotogetthe person,andwhenyounowreadCookvTate,itwill becomesoclearthatyouwillwonderwhyyoudidnot seeitbefore.Youdidnotseeitbeforebecauseyou didnothavethisinformationbeforeyoutodigest. Hereishowtheydiditandlookingbacktothecases aboveitshouldbeevidenttoyou. YouarebornaMAN,notaperson,orindividual.God createdMAN.DidGodcreateperson,individualor citizen?NostatutesarewrittenwithManinthem, onlyperson.Foronlyartificialentitiescango afterotherartificialentities,theycannotattack MAN.Read"PERSON"articlewrittenon www.atgpress.com/forfurtherclarification.The

YouarebornaMAN,notaperson,orindividual.God createdMAN.DidGodcreateperson,individualor citizen?NostatutesarewrittenwithManinthem, onlyperson.Foronlyartificialentitiescango afterotherartificialentities,theycannotattack MAN.Read"PERSON"articlewrittenon www.atgpress.com/forfurtherclarification.The constitutionisformembersonly,theStates,not people.PeoplecannotjointheUnion.Toproveittry tojointheUnion.Statesarecorporations.People, MAN,canbecomeamemberofaStatebyregisteringto voteortakinganoathtosupportthatcontract calledaconstitution.Oncedoingthatyouarea stockholderandthereforeacitizenofthatstate. Citizenisanartificialcharacteranda Fictionof Law .Thestatutesofcontractaregearedtoward personwhichisartificialincharacter.Nowthatyou haveclaimedcitizenshipofaState,youaredeemed bytheCourtsasapersonofartificialcharacter. Artificialcharactershavenoconstitutional protectionsandareinthesameclassasother artificialentities(corporations).Toprovethis lookatthewordsthatdefinepersonin26U.S.C. 7701(a)(1)whichareindividual,corporation, association,partnership,trust,estate,andcompany, allbeingartificialentities.Beingthisisso,your partofthedebtofthegovernmentispredicatedon themembership(readinthecaseabove),whereveryou mightbe.ThedebttheStatehastotheUnited States,asaUnionmember,istransferredtoallits memberstopayafederalincometax.Soitmatters notwhereyouaretheIRScangointothestate,any state,andhasjurisdictionbecauseyouarea "person"describedinthestatuteswhoisresidentin theirpoliticalsubdivision,thestate. Soyouaretakenintocourtandclaimthatyouarea sovereigncitizen.Remember"citizen"isan artificialentity,aFictionofLaw."Citizen"isnot natural.Sothecourtnotesyou,byyourown admission,area"member"ofthebodypoliticand proceedsonthatFictionofLaw.Youargueyouare notthepersonliablebecausethestatutesdonot definetheactivitythatmakesyouliable.Thefact ofthematteris,isthatyouarethe"person"inthe statuteandthetaxpayerin7701(a)(14).Theperson iswhatmakesyouliable,notsomuchtheactivity. SoaswaspostedintheCoopercaseontheinternet, thateveryonewantstobelievethattheuseofthe postofficemakesfordualcitizenshipistotally wrong.Dualcitizenshipispredicatedonthefactyou area"member"ofapoliticalsubdivision(State)of theUnitedStates,ergohavedualcitizenshipfor taxationasyouareresponsibleforthedebtsofboth corporations,theStateandtheUnitedStates.Soyou arean"individual"requiredtofileanindividual incometaxform.IincludeanexcerptfromTheNew HistoryofAmericathatprovesthepoint. U.S.vSlater,822USTC9571 "Thereisataximposed,in26U.S.C.Sec.1, ontheincomeof `everyindividual .'No provisionexistsinthetaxcodeexempting fromtaxation persons who,likeSlater, characterizethemselvesassomehowstanding apartfromtheAmericanpolity,andthe defendantcitesnoauthoritysupportinghis position.Slater'sprotestationstothe effectthathederivesnobenefitfromthe UnitedStatesgovernmenthavenobearingon hislegalobligationtopayincometaxes. (citesomitted) Unless thedefendantcan establishthathe isNOTacitizenofthe UnitedStates ,theIRSpossessesauthorityto attempttodeterminehisfederaltax liability." Noticethelastsentence,andalso,theycanonly attemptonaU.S.citizen .Nowtotheothercase whichisanAppealintheSeventhCircuitandshe lost

attempttodeterminehisfederaltax liability." Noticethelastsentence,andalso,theycanonly attemptonaU.S.citizen .Nowtotheothercase whichisanAppealintheSeventhCircuitandshe lost RachelTempletonvInternalRevenueService,861363 onappealfrom85C457. "Finally,weaddressTempleton'ssecond argumentinwhichsheclaimsthatsheisnot a' person liable'ora'taxpayer',asthose termsaredefinedbytheInternalRevenue Codeandtherelevantcaselaw,andasa resultthattheprovisionsofsection6103do notapplyinhercase.Weagreewiththe districtcourtthatthis claimispatently frivolous .AsTempleton doesNOTdisputethat sheisacitizenoftheUnitedStates ,and becausetheCodeimposesanincometaxon `everyindividual whoisa citizenor resident oftheUnitedStates,'26C.F.R. Sec.1.1(1)(a)(1985),itwouldclearly contradictthe'plainmeaning'ofthetermto concludethatCongressdidnotintendthat Templetonbeconsidereda'taxpayer'asthe termisusedthroughouttheCode." Inbothcasesthepeopleclaimedtobecitizensof (belongingto)theUnitedStates,sothetribunals wereabsolutelyrightintheirdeterminationsbecause theyfellunder26Sec.1inUSCandCFR.Most certainlytheyconsentedtothejurisdictionin question.Argueagainsttheircodesasmightilyas youwant,itmattersnot.Theyjoinedtheinsurance clubasSpoonerstated,didn'tthey? ENDOFEXCERPT. Idon'tknowhowmuchplaineritcanget.Thatiswhy Ipublishedthefactthat"inlaw"person,resident, andindividualareallartificialentities.Theyare workingafictionoflawbecauseyoufellrightinto legalterminologywhileNOT,inyourmind,thinking the"legal"definitionsappliedtotheseterms.You helpedputthenailinyourowncoffinsotospeak, byhelpingthefictionoflawprevailagainstyou.So allthelawthatyouuseasadefenseisfornaught. AsevidencedfromtheSlaterandTempletoncase,this isexactlywhathashappenedallacrossthiscountry ineverycourtcasebeforethattime,(lookatthe CookvTateCase)andeverycaseafterthat.Nowyou canappreciatewhyyoulosebythisdefinition statementtowit "afictionisdefinedasafalseavermentonthepartofthePlaintiffwhichthedefendantis notallowedtotraverse,theobjectbeingtogivethecourtjurisdiction.Black'sLaw Dictionary3rdEd.(1969)Pg.468Inthecaseof"WillfulfailuretoFile,"thePlaintiffand courtinventsthe"fiction"thatdefendantisa"taxpayer",A.K.A."Person."Motionsand briefswhichrelyonpreceptsoflawwillthereafterbedeniedorfoundfrivolous." Now,thisisnotafalseavermentonthePlaintiff becauseYOUcreatedthefictionoflaweitherbyyour actions,orinactionsindenyingthat,youarea registeredvoteraresidentofaStateaperson,a individualamemberofaStateacitizenofa StateaUnitedStatescitizenthatyour constitutionisdesignedtoprotectyou,OR,claiming thatyouareasovereigncitizen.Useanyofthese andyou,notthem,areoperatingafictionoflaw.Do youthinktheyaregoingtotellyouallthese things?NO! Soletmeplaydevil'sadvocate.Ifyouarea "Sovereigncitizen"andclaimtheyareyourservants, youaresupposedtoknowallthelawthatyour servantsaretouseandyouwouldnotuseanyofthe termslistedintheaboveparagraph.Sowhydoyou usethoseterms?Usingthesetermsprovesthat sovereigncitizenistrulyanoxymoronasIhave alwaysstated.Thereasonis,sovereignisthe oppositeofcitizen.Thisiswhatthemassesandthe

"Sovereigncitizen"andclaimtheyareyourservants, youaresupposedtoknowallthelawthatyour servantsaretouseandyouwouldnotuseanyofthe termslistedintheaboveparagraph.Sowhydoyou usethoseterms?Usingthesetermsprovesthat sovereigncitizenistrulyanoxymoronasIhave alwaysstated.Thereasonis,sovereignisthe oppositeofcitizen.Thisiswhatthemassesandthe mosteducatedsocalled"patriot"cannotfathom becauseofthefraudanddeceitplaceduponyousince childhood.Youcarrythefraudwithyoutoyourgrave andindoingsopassitontoyourchildrenso everyonebelievesthereisthisthingcalled sovereigncitizen.Whypeoplecannotthinkfor themselvesisbeyondme.Allonehastodois researchthewordcitizentoseeheisunderalegal disability,whileSovereignisnotunderanylegal disability.Theequivalent,respectively,are prose/properandsuijuris.Legaltermsarenot commontermsandaredraftedtodeceive. Sowhoisworkingafictionoflawthatwillnever allowyoutoprevail?Itisnotthegovernment.Itis you.Thegovernmentcourtsareonlyfollowingthelaw andwhatyousay.Placeyourselfasthejudgeandyou knowthe"legalterms"thatapplyincourt.Youare boundbyoathtogivejustice.Amancomesbeforeyou andclaimsheisa"person",onlynotoneliableto payaincometax.Healsoclaimsheisasovereign citizenoftheStateofSo&So.Hebringsinthe argumentthatthereisnostatutestatingheis requiredtofileanincometaxformorpayatax. KnowinghehasjuststatedFictionsoflaw,youhave torulebythelaw.Thelawsayspersonliable.He statedhewasaperson.Sincethis"person"has receivedatransferoveracertainsumofdebt obligations,he,ismadeliablefortheuseand transferofthesedebtobligations,see'Useand Transfer'and'Isthiswhatmakesyouliable',on atgpress.com.Thismandidalltheworkforyouin presentingallthefictionsofLawtoconvicthim. You,asajudgecannotruleagainstthelaw.Seemy point?Wellthisconcludesanotherfacetofour problem.Notonesingleargumentwillwin,butthis isascloseasyouaregoingtoget.Allthearticles onwww.atgpress.com/dovetailtomakeaneatpackage. IgivethisfreelysothatYOU,andnooneelse,can makethedecisionthatIamlyingortellingthe truth.AsIsay,checkmyinformationoutand everyonethatstatesitiswrong.Leavenostone unturned,asyouaretheonethatsuffers,notus. Sincerely, TheInformer