Cell Name Original Value Final Value
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [AjaxComputersTransportation_1.xls]Sheet1
Report Created: 5/16/2008 11:53:56 AM
Adjustable Cells
Cell
Name
$B$12 Plant Chicago
$C$12 Plant St Louis
$D$12 Plant Detroit
$E$12 Plant Cincinnati
$F$12 Plant Louisville
$G$12 Plant Indianapolis
$H$12 Plant Milwaukee
$I$12 Plant Minneapolis
$B$13 Warehouse Chicago
$C$13 Warehouse St Louis
$D$13 Warehouse Detroit
$E$13 Warehouse Cincinnati
$F$13 Warehouse Louisville
$G$13 Warehouse Indianapolis
$H$13 Warehouse Milwaukee
$I$13 Warehouse Minneapolis
Constraints
Cell
Name
$B$14 Demand Chicago
$C$14 Demand St Louis
$D$14 Demand Detroit
$E$14 Demand Cincinnati
$F$14 Demand Louisville
$G$14 Demand Indianapolis
$H$14 Demand Milwaukee
$I$14 Demand Minneapolis
$J$12 Plant Supply
$J$13 Warehouse Supply
Cell Value
22
14
18
17
15
13
15
20
89
45
Formula
$B$14=$B$8
$C$14=$C$8
$D$14=$D$8
$E$14=$E$8
$F$14=$F$8
$G$14=$G$8
$H$14=$H$8
$I$14=$I$8
$J$12<=$J$6
$J$13<=$J$7
Status
Slack
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
0
Not Binding
11
Binding
0
Adjustable Cells
Cell
$B$12
$C$12
$D$12
$E$12
$F$12
$G$12
$H$12
$I$12
$B$13
$C$13
$D$13
$E$13
$F$13
$G$13
$H$13
$I$13
Name
Plant Chicago
Plant St Louis
Plant Detroit
Plant Cincinnati
Plant Louisville
Plant Indianapolis
Plant Milwaukee
Plant Minneapolis
Warehouse Chicago
Warehouse St Louis
Warehouse Detroit
Warehouse Cincinnati
Warehouse Louisville
Warehouse Indianapolis
Warehouse Milwaukee
Warehouse Minneapolis
Final
Value
22
0
18
17
0
13
15
4
0
14
0
0
15
0
0
16
Reduced
Cost
Objective
Coefficient
14
24
21
20
21.5
19
17
30
24
15
28
20
18.5
19.5
24
28
Allowable
Increase
12
1E+30
9.000000001
1.999999999
1E+30
2.499999998
8.999999998
1.000000003
1E+30
7.000000004
1E+30
1E+30
1.000000003
1E+30
1E+30
1.999999999
Allowable
Decrease
1E+30
7.000000004
1E+30
1E+30
1.000000003
1E+30
1E+30
1.999999999
12
1E+30
9.000000001
1.999999999
1E+30
2.499999998
8.999999998
1.000000003
Final
Shadow
Constraint
Value
Price
R.H. Side
22
14
22
14
17
14
18
21
18
17
20
17
15
20.5
15
13
19
13
15
17
15
20
30
20
89
0
100
45 -1.999999999
45
Allowable
Increase
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
1E+30
4
Allowable
Decrease
22
4
18
17
4
13
15
4
11
11
0
7.000000004
0
0
1.000000003
0
0
0
12
0
9.000000001
1.999999999
0
2.499999998
8.999999998
0
Constraints
Cell
$B$14
$C$14
$D$14
$E$14
$F$14
$G$14
$H$14
$I$14
$J$12
$J$13
Name
Demand Chicago
Demand St Louis
Demand Detroit
Demand Cincinnati
Demand Louisville
Demand Indianapolis
Demand Milwaukee
Demand Minneapolis
Plant Supply
Warehouse Supply
Target
Cell
Name
$B$17 Total Cost Chicago
Cell
$B$12
$C$12
$D$12
$E$12
$F$12
$G$12
$H$12
$I$12
$B$13
$C$13
$D$13
$E$13
$F$13
$G$13
$H$13
$I$13
Adjustable
Name
Plant Chicago
Plant St Louis
Plant Detroit
Plant Cincinnati
Plant Louisville
Plant Indianapolis
Plant Milwaukee
Plant Minneapolis
Warehouse Chicago
Warehouse St Louis
Warehouse Detroit
Warehouse Cincinnati
Warehouse Louisville
Warehouse Indianapolis
Warehouse Milwaukee
Warehouse Minneapolis
Value
2583.5
Value
22
0
18
17
0
13
15
4
0
14
0
0
15
0
0
16
Lower
Limit
22
0
18
17
0
13
15
4
0
14
0
0
15
0
0
16
Target
Result
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
Upper
Limit
22
0
18
17
0
13
15
4
0
14
0
0
15
0
0
16
Target
Result
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
2583.5
From/To
Plant
Warehouse
Demand
Total Cost
2583.5
Supply
100
45
134
Supply
89
45
134
134<145 Feasibble