Unit 11 Complexometric Tit Rations
Unit 11 Complexometric Tit Rations
Structure
11.1 11.2 Introduction
Objectives
Complexometric Titrations
11.3
11.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous unit you have learnt about the principles and analytical estimations based on redox titration. In this unit you would learn about another very important type of titrimetric method based on complexation equilibrium. In this method, the metal ion to be determined is made to react quantitatively with a suitable reagent and is converted into a complex ion. The equivalence point of the titration is determined by using metal ion indicators or spectrometric or electrometric methods. In this unit we begin with a brief review of the basic concepts of coordination compounds and the nature and characteristics of the metal-ligand complex equilibria. The basic principle of complexometric titrations and related issues will be illustrated by taking an important complexometric reagent called ethylenediamminetetraacetic acid, EDTA. We would conclude the unit with some important analytical applications of complexometric titrations.
Objectives
After studying this unit, you should be able to: define the terms associated with metal-ligand complexes, discuss the formation and stability of metal-ligand complexes, compute the stability and instability constants for the metal complexes from the given data, explain the principle of complexometric titrations, describe the theory of metallochromic indicators, enlist and explain different methods of detecting the end point in complexometric titrations,
33
define and explain the terms like masking, demasking in the context of complexometric determinations, suggest strategies for determination of metal ions in a mixture, and enlist important analytical applications of complexometric titrations.
NH3 Cu NH3
Similarly, carbon monoxide forms complex with metals like iron in the zero oxidation state to form what is called a metal carbonyl. You may note that the metals as well as the complexing agent both are neutral in case of metal carbonyls. Fe(s) Ligands The charged or neutral species with lone pair of electrons that form the coordinate bond with the metal (atom or ion) to form the complex are called ligands. These may be simple ions such as Cl, small molecules such as H2O or NH3 , larger molecules such as H2NCH2CH2NH2 (ethylenediamine) or even very large macromolecules, like proteins etc. Further, a ligand that can form only one coordinate bond with the metal atom/ion is called a unidentate ligand. Similarly, the one forming two such bonds is called a didentate and the one forming more than two bonds is generally referred to as a polydentate ligand. However, the terms like, tridentate tetradentate etc. for the ligand forming 3 and 4 coordinate bonds respectively are also used. The number of bonds formed by the ligands is called as their denticity. For example one of very 34 + 5CO (g) Fe (CO)5
commonly used ligand called ethylenediamminetetraacetic acid, EDTA, is a hexadentate ligand as it forms six bonds with the metal ion. The structure of the EDTA and its metal complex are given Fig. 11.1. You would learn in details about the complex formation involving EDTA and the related issues and analytical applications in the subsequent sections.
C O2
+ +
Complexometric Titrations
H O2 C -O C 2
HN
NH
CO2H
Fig. 11.1: (a) Structure of EDTA and (b) its metal complex
You would recall that, sometimes, the ligand is capable of forming the bond through two different atoms. Such ligands are called ambidentate ligands. For example, NO2 can coordinate either through nitrogen or through oxygen atom to a central metal atom/ion.
O M N O M O N O
Similarly, the thiocyanate ion can form bonds through S or N atoms. Chelates When a polydentate ligand simultaneously forms more than one bond with the same metal atom/ion, it forms a ring type structure called chelate. The complexing agent is called a chelating agent. EDTA is a good example of a chelating agent. In EDTA a pair of unshared electrons capable of complexing with a metal ion is located on each of the two nitrogen atoms and each of the four ionised carboxyl groups. You may see the chelate or ring formation in the metal-EDTA complex given above. There is no fundamental difference between coordination compound and a chelate compound except that in a chelate compound, ring influences the stability of the complex formed. Thus, a chelate can be described as a heterocyclic ring structure in which a metal atom/ion is a member of the ring. The stability of a chelate is usually much greater than that of corresponding unidentate metal complex. The structures of some commonly used polydentate ligands are given in Fig. 11.2.
C O2
+
The word chelate is derived from the Greek word , chel meaning claw.
NH CO2H C O2 CO2H
-O C 2 H O2 C
HN
H N+ -O C 2
CO 2H
NH
+
C O2
NH
35
The solubility of metal chelates in water can be attributed to the presence of hydrophilic groups such as COOH, SO3H, NH2 and OH. If the chelating agent contains acidic as well as basic groups, the complex formed is soluble over a wide range of pH. In the absence of these groups, the solubilities of the chelating agent and the metal chelate are low. However, such chelates may be soluble in organic solvents. The chelating agents that form water-soluble complexes with bi- or polyvalent metal ions are called sequestering agents. These squeeze out the metal from the solution; in fact the metal remains in solution, but it fails to give normal ionic reactions as it exists in the form of a complex. Thus a sequestering agent may be defined as a substance that apparently removes a metal ion from a solution by forming a complex ion that does not have the chemical reactions of the metal ion that is removed. For example, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid is a typical sequestering agent. It reacts with most polyvalent metal ions to form water soluble complexes which cannot be extracted from aqueous solutions with organic solvents. On the other hand the complexes of dimethylglyoxime and salicylaldoxime are insoluble in water, but dissolve in organic solvents. You should be clear about the fact that chelating agents generally are good sequestering agents but all chelating agents do not behave the same way. For example the ring forming ligands like, dimethylglyoxime and salicylaldoxime are just chelating agents as these form insoluble complexes.
CH = NOH H3 C H3 C C C NOH NOH OH Salicylaldoxime
Dimethylglyoxime
EDTA forms chelates with practically most of the metal ions and this fact is exploited in the complexometric determination of these ions using EDTA. Such titrations are called complexometric or chilometric or EDTA titrations. Under favourable conditions, more than one metal ion may be present in the complex. In case two metal ions are present, the complex is called a binuclear complex and if there are more than two metal ions the complex is referred to as a polynuclear complex. The formation of binuclear and polynuclear complexes is favoured by the formation of complex using high concentration of the metal ion. For example, Zn2+ and Cl ions react to form a binuclear complex, [Zn2Cl6] 2 .
The equilibrium constant for the formation of complex as given in Eq.11.1 is called formation constant, Kf, and can be written as follows.
Kf =
[Cd ] [NH ]
2+ 3
[Cd(NH ) ]
2+ 3 4 4
= 5.5 10 7
36
The reverse of reaction 11.1 is characterised by another constant, appropriately called dissociation constant, Kd as it corresponds to a dissociation reaction. Numerically the dissociation constant is the reciprocal of Kf.
Complexometric Titrations
Cd 2+ [NH 3 ] 1 Kd = = 2+ Kf Cd (NH 3 )4
Generally the complexation reactions occur in a series of steps. The reaction between Cd2+ and NH3 given above also occurs in the same way and involves four successive steps as follows.
Cd2+ (aq) + NH3 (aq)
[Cd (NH3 )]2+ (aq) + NH3 (aq)
As all the steps involve equilibrium reactions, it becomes somewhat difficult to ascertain which of the series of reactions is described by the formation constant defined above. In order to resolve this apparent ambiguity, two types of formation constants have been defined. According to the first type, the individual steps are characterised by what are called stepwise formation constants. These are designated as Ki for the ith step and characterise the successive addition of a ligand to the metalligand complex formed in the previous step. Accordingly, the equilibrium constants for four steps shown above are called as, K1, K2, K3, and K4 respectively. On the other hand, the overall or cumulative formation constants refer to the reaction upto a certain stage of complex formation. These are designated as and characterise the addition of i ligands to the free metal ion. The overall equilibrium constant for the reaction given in Eq. (11.1) will be called as 4 as it involves bonding of 4 ligands and (NH3) to the metal ion. This can be shown as given below.
4 = K1 K2 K3 K4
In general, we can write it in the following manner
It has been assumed here that neither any insoluble product nor any polynuclear species is formed in the case of complex formation.
i = K1 K2 . . . Ki
As you are aware, the solubility of certain solids or precipitates formed in a reaction increases due to the formation of complex ions. In such cases the characteristic equilibrium constant expression are obtained by combining relevant Ksp and Kf expressions. Let us take the example of the precipitate of AgCl. The solubility of AgCl increases in the presence of excess chloride due to the formation of the complex AgCl2 ions. The reaction can be written as follows. AgCl(s) + Cl (aq) AgCl2 (aq) .(11.2)
The reaction can be separated into the three reactions with known equilibrium constant values. The first of these is the dissolution reaction of AgCl, characterised by its Ksp value AgCl(s) Ag+ (aq) + Cl (aq) ;
Ksp = [Ag+][Cl ]
The other two reactions are the stepwise formation of AgCl2 , from Ag+ ions as given below, the respective equilibrium constants for the reactions being K1 and K2..
37
AgCl(aq) ;
K1 =
AgCl2 (aq) ;
K2 =
AgCl 2 [AgCl][Cl ]
The equilibrium constant for reaction given as (11.2) would therefore be equal to Ksp*K1*K2.
Nature of the metal ion: The nature of metal ion determines the type of bonding with the ligand donor atom; more the electrostatic character of the bond stable the complex. Therefore, small ions with high charges lead to stronger complexes. Nature of the ligand: The nature of bond formed between the ligand and metal ion also influence the stability. Moreso, the ligands forming chelates impart extra stability. For example the complex of nickel with the hexadentate ligand, penten, is more than 1010 times stronger than the one formed by ammonia. Basicity of the ligand: The stability of a series of complexes can be correlated to the ability of the ligand to accept a proton; greater the basicity of the ligand greater the stability the complex. Size of chelate ring: As mentioned above, the formation of chelates by the ligands makes the complex stable. The formation of five- or six-membered rings provides the maximum stability. Number of metal chelate rings: The stability of the complex is directly related to the number of chelate rings formed between the ligand and metal ion. Greater the number of such rings, greater is the stability. Resonance effects: The formation of five- or six-membered rings can be explained in terms the conjugative effects which affect the stability of the complex also. Steric effects: The steric effects refer to the sizes of the ligands, their spatial arrangement and the distances between the coordination sites. These also play an important role in the stability of the complexes.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
SAQ 1
Define denticity of a ligand. Compute the denticity of the following ligand at a pH of more than 10.
C O2
+
NH CO2H C O2 CO2H
NH
... ...
38
SAQ 2
Show that for the complexation of Cd2+ and NH3, 4 = K1 K2 K3 K4. ... ... ... ... ...
Complexometric Titrations
choosing a suitable complexing agent choosing a suitable method of detecting the end point choosing the experimental conditions that provides an optimum titration
Complexometric titrations have the advantages of complex formation and at the same time suffer from the limitations of titrimetric methods. For example, although the complex formed is undissociated, it does not suffer from co-precipitation errors as in the case of precipitation titrations. The fact that a complexing agent coordinates with only certain metal ions i.e., it shows selectivity is an added feature of the complex formation. However, on the flip side, the stoichiometry of the complex is not well defined as in a redox, neutralization, or precipitation titration. Further, if the complexing titrant is an organic compound, we need to be careful about the solubility properties of the complex. As mentioned earlier, EDTA is probably the most versatile and exploited titrant in complexometric titrations. Let us learn about the EDTA in detail.
39
determination. Alternatively, the standardisation can be accomplished by titrating against a solution made from the primary standard CaCO3. Though EDTA has been extensively exploited for quantitative determinations of the metal ions it cannot be used for the direct analysis of anions or neutral ligands. In such cases, standard solutions of Ag+ or Hg2+ are used as the titrants. The aqueous solutions of Ag+ and Hg2+ are prepared from AgNO3 and Hg (NO3)2, respectively. As both of these are secondary standards these need to be standardised. The standardisation is achieved by titrating the reagent against a primary standard like NaCl.
[MY]2 - + 2H+
[MY] - + 2H+
[MY] + 2H+
The generalised reaction between the metal ion and the EDTA can be described as given below. Y 4 + Mn+ MY n 4
Where, Y4 is a shorthand notation for the fully dissociated molecule of EDTA. The formation constant for the complex will be given as following.
Kf = [MY n 4 ] [M n + ][Y 4 ]
For example, the formation of a metal-EDTA complex with Cd2+ can be represented as Cd2+ (aq) + Y4 (aq) CdY2 (aq)
The equilibrium constant (better called as formation constant) for the reaction is given as follows and has a value of 2.9 1016 implying that the complex is quite stable and the reaction goes far to the right. [CdY 2 ] [Cd 2+ ][ Y 4 ]
Kf =
The formation constant for the complexes formed by EDTA with different metal ions are compiled in Table 11.1.
40
Table 11.1: The formation constants of metal-EDTA complexes Ion log Kf Ion log Kf Ion log Kf
Complexometric Titrations
Li+ Na+ K+ Be2+ Mg2+ Ca2+ Sr2+ Ba2+ Ra2+ Sc3+ La3+ V2+ Cr2+ Mn2+ Fe2+ Co2+ Ni2+ Cu2+ Ti3+ V3+ Cr3+
2.79 1.66 0.8 9.2 8.79 10.69 8.73 7.86 7.1 23.1 15.50 12.7 13.6 13.87 14.32 16.31 18.62 18.81 21.3 (25o ) 26.0 23.4
25.3 (25o C) 25.1 41.4 (25o C) 29.5 29.5 ( = 0.2) 18.8 15.55 7.32 6.54 18.5 (25o C, = 0.2) 16.50 16.46 21.7 18.3 ( = 0) 18.04 16.3 20.3 25.0 37.8 ( = 1.0)
Ce3+ Pr3+ Nd3+ Pm3+ Sm3+ Eu3+ Gd3+ Tb3+ Dy3+ Ho3+ Tm3+ Yb3+ Lu3+ Am3+ Cm3+ Bk3+ Cf3+ Th4+ U4+ Np4+
15.98 16.40 16.61 17.0 17.14 17.35 17.37 17.93 18.30 18.62 19.32 19.51 19.83 17.8 (25o C) 18.1 (25o C) 18.5 (25o C) 18.7 (25o C) 23.2 25.8 24.6 (25o , =1.0)
pKa values of EDTA pK 1 = 0.0
Ag+ Tl+ Pd2+ Zn2+ Cd2+ Hg2+ Sn2+ Pb2+ Al3+ Ga3+ In3+ Tl3+ Bi3+
27.8
41
H4Y
H2O
H3O+
H3Y -
K 1 = 1.00 10 2 =
K 2 = 2.16 10 3 = K 3 = 6.92 10 7 =
[ H 2 O + ][ H 3 Y ] [H 4 Y]
[ H 3 O + ][H 2 Y 2 ] [H 3 Y ] [ H 3 O + ][HY 3 ] [ H 2 Y 2 ]
+
+
+
H2 O
H2O
H2O
H3 O+
H3O+
H3O+
+
+
+
H2Y2 HY3 Y4 -
K 4 = 5.50 10 11 =
[ H 3 O + ][Y 4 ] [ HY 3 ]
The Y4 form of EDTA is the predominate form at pH values greater than 10.17 and are the only significant form for pH greater than 12. Now since EDTA exists in different forms at a given pH, the principle of mass balance requires that the total concentration of EDTA should be equal to the sum of the concentrations of all the forms of EDTA, viz.,
C EDTA = H 6 Y 2+ + H 5 Y + + [H 4 Y ]+ H 3 Y + H 2 Y 2 + HY 3 + Y 4
] [
][
] [
][ ]
This implies that the generalised formation constant defined in Eq. (11.1) is not a true formation constant because in the denominator it reflects only one form of EDTA viz., Y 4 . Thus, to get a clearer picture of the formation constant we define a parameter ( Y 4 ) to be the fraction of EDTA present as Y 4 .
Y 4 =
[Y 4 ] [H 6 Y 2+ ] + [ H 5 Y + ] + [H 4 Y] + [H 3 Y ] + [ H 2 Y 2 ] + [ HY 3 ] + [Y 4 ]
Y 4 = [Y 4 ] [EDTA ]
The value of Y 4 depends on the concentration of H3O+ and the acid dissociation constants for EDTA. The expressions for Y 4 can be shown to be in the following manner.
Y 4- = K a1 K a 2 K a 3 K a 4
a1
[H O ] + K [H O ] + K
+ 4 + 3 3 a1 3
K a 2 H 3O + + K a1 K a 2 K a 3 H3O + + K a1 K a 2 K a 3 K a 4
The values for other species are given in terms of the following expressions. HY 3
[HY ] = K =
3
a1
K a2 K a3 H 3O +
D
a1
[Y ]
2
2Y
[H Y ] = K =
2
K a2 H 3O +
D
+ 3 3
[Y ]
H Y
3
[H Y ] = K [H O ] =
3 a1
[Y]
4
H 4Y where,
D = H3O +
[H Y ] = [H O ] =
3
+ 4
[Y ]
+ K a1 H 3 O +
+ K a1 K a 2 H 3 O +
+ K a1 K a 2 K a 3 H 3 O + + K a 1 K a 2 K a 3 K a 4
42
Complexometric Titrations
Fig. 11.3: Fractional distribution of different species in the solution of EDTA at different pH values
Fig. 11.3 reveals that in the acidic pH range the species, Y 4 is present at very low concentrations whereas it becomes the predominant species at pH of the order of 12.
[MY n 4 ] [M n + ] Y 4 C EDTA
Since at a given pH, the value of Y 4 is a constant it can be combined with the formation constant, we get the following.
K f Y 4 = K f' = [MY n 4 ] [M n + ] C EDTA
The new constant, K f' is called apparent or conditional stability constant. As the Y 4 value becomes smaller and smaller with a decrease in the pH, the conditional formation constant also becomes smaller. This in turn means that the metal EDTA complex becomes lesser and lesser stable at low pH. Therefore it becomes pertinent to perform EDTA titrations at suitable pH values using appropriate buffer systems. The values of Y 4 for EDTA at different pH values are given in Table 11.2.
pH
0 1 2 3 4
Y4
1.3 10 23 1.9 10 18 3.310 14 2.610 11 3.8 10 9
pH
7 8 9 10
Y4
5.0 10 4 5.610 3 5.410 2 0.36
11 12 13
5 6
3.7 10 7 2.3 10 5
43
Compute the concentration of free Ca2+ ions in a 0.10 M solution of CaY 2 at a pH=6.0 and at pH=10.0. Use the data given in Table 11.1 and Table 11.2. Ca2+ + EDTA Ca2+ + EDTA Conc i Conc f
K f' =
CaY2 CaY2 0
K f' = Y 4 K f
0.1 0.1 x
Substituting the values and solving the equations we get the following. At pH = 10
x = Ca 2+ = 2.4 10 6 M At pH = 6
x = Ca 2+ = 3.0 10 -4 M
Kf
Zn (NH3)2+ + NH3
Zn(NH3)2+
2
Kf
Zn(NH3)2+ + NH3 2
Zn(NH3)2+
3
Kf
[ Zn ( NH 3 ) 2 + ] [ NH 3 ] 2 [ Zn ( NH 3 ) 2 + ] 4
2 [ Zn ( NH 3 ) 3 + ] [ NH 3 ]
2+ Zn(NH3)3 + NH3
2+ Zn(NH3)4
Kf
If EDTA forms a stronger complex with Mn+ ion than ammonia then it will displace NH3 from the metal-NH3 complex. However, the presence of NH3 decreases the stability of the Mn+-EDTA complex. Therefore the presence of another complexing ligand like ammonia does affect the metal-EDTA equilibria. Similar to the case of EDTA at different pH values, here too the relative concentrations of the metal ion (zinc) can be expressed in terms of a parameter given below.
44
Zn 2+ =
[Zn ]
2+
[Zn ]
2+
Complexometric Titrations
where [Zn ] is the total concentration of zinc ions when no EDTA has been added,
[ Zn ] = Zn 2 + + Zn (NH 3 )
] [
The value of Zn 2 + depends only on the concentration of NH3 and the formation constants for the zinc-ammonia complexes. In general the parameter M n + may be defined as the ratio of the concentration of the free metal ion to the all the forms of metal/ metal complexes present before the addition of EDTA.
Fig. 11.4: A schematic diagram showing the titration curve of a metal EDTA titration
The schematic titration curve shown in Fig 11.4 has three distinct regions, the initial region where there is an excess of the metal ion the inflection region corresponding to the equivalence or end point and the third region where there is an excess of the titrant EDTA. The jump or the rise in the pM value around the equivalence point depends on many factors like the stabilities of the metal indicator and metal EDTA complexes besides pH. As discussed earlier, the value of Y 4 depends a great deal on the pH of the solution accordingly the titration curve also gets altered. The effect of pH on the titration curve of a metal-EDTA titration is shown in Fig.11.5.
45
SAQ 3
Silver forms a 1:1complex with ethylenediamine having a formation constant of 5.0 104. Calculate the concentration of silver ions in equilibrium in a solution containing 0.1M each of the complex and the ligand. ... ... ... ...
46
a low stability constant than the chelate-metal complex. Therefore, in the course of the titration the colour of the solution remains that of the metal-indicator complex until the end point, when an equivalent amount of the titrant has been added. At the equivalence point the titrant decomposes metal-dye complex to produce free dye which is manifested by a change in the colour. It is important that the stability constant for the metal-indicator complex is lower than the metal-titrant complex and has an optimum value. If it is too large, the sample will be over titrated, and if it is too small, an under titration is possible. Let us try to visualise the changes occurring during the course of complexometric titration involving metallochromic indicator. Let us denote the metal ion being determined as M, the indicator by I and titrant as T. In the beginning of the titration, the reaction medium contains the metal-indicator complex, MI and the uncomplexed metal ion, M; the metal ion being the major component. As the titrant, T is added to the solution, it complexes with the free metal ions; the MI complex being undisturbed. Once the free metal ions are exhausted, a competitive reaction sets in between the titrant and the indicator for the remaining metal ions. As the metal-indicator complex (MI) is weaker than the metal-titrant complex, the titrant binds the metal ions in preference to the indicator and in the process dissociates the MI complex. At the end point, EDTA removes the last traces of the metal from the indicator and the indicator changes its colour from the complexed colour form to its metal free colour. Let us illustrate it with the help of an example. In case of an important complexometric determination viz., hardness of water we use eriochrome black T or solochrome black as metal ion indicator. Eriochrome black T is sodium 1-(1-hydroxy-2-napthylazo)-6-nitro-2napthol-4-sulphonate. Its structure is as shown below.
OH Na + O3S N N OH
Complexometric Titrations
As the indicator is added in very small amount generally no titration error is observed.
At present, several different indicators are available for each metal ion. It is possible to choose a metallochromic indicator purely on the basis of ease in observing a color change.
O2N
Eriochrome black T
In the beginning of the titration, eriochrome black T forms a wine red complex with the metal ions subsequent addition of the EDTA is used in complexing the free metal ion. At the end point of the titration, when the available metal ions are fully complexed with EDTA, the colour changes to blue the colour of the free indicator. MIn + H2Y 2 (wine red)
MY 2 + HIn 2 (blue)
where H2Y 2 represents disodium salt of EDTA and HIn 2 represents eriochrome black T in a buffer solution of pH 10. While using the metallochromic indicators one must be careful about the pH of the reaction solution. This is so because most visual metallochromic indicators, in addition to being complexing agents, are also acid-base indicators. In other words, they are capable of undergoing a color change with a corresponding change in pH of the solution. For example, calmagite- an indicator for the determination of calcium ions which may be represented as H3In, undergoes a change in color from the red (H2In) to blue (HIn2) at a pH of about 8.1. The blue of HIn2 changes to the red-orange (In3) at a pH of about 12.4. As the color of metal-indicator complexes are red, it can be used as a metallochromic indicator only in the range of pH = 911, at which almost all the
47
indicator is present as HIn2 (blue). It is, therefore, important to maintain the pH of the solution in the course of the complexometric titrations.
H2 ln Red pH 5.3 - 7.3 H ln2 Blue pH 10.5 - 12.5 ln3 Yellow - Orange
The useful pH range for some common metallochromic indicators is compiled in Table 11.3.
Table 11.3: Some common metallochromic indicators and their useful pH range Indicator
Calmagite Eriochrome Balck R Eriochrome Blue R Murexide PAN Salicylic acid
Useful pH range
9 11 7.5-10.5 8-12 6-13 2-11 2-3
Useful for
Ba, Ca, Mg, Zn Ba, Ca, Mg, Zn Ca, Mg, Zn, Cu Ca, Ni, Cu Cd, Cu, Zn Fe
A number of metallochromic indicators are available. However, for any such indicator to be used for the visual detection of end points in complexometric titration must meet the following requirements.
The colour reaction must occur at the end point when nearly all the metal ion is complexed with EDTA. The indicator must be very sensitive to metal ions (i.e. to pM) so that the colour change occurs as near to equivalence point as possible. The colour reaction should be specific or selective. The colour contrast between the free and the metal-bound indicator complex should be readily observable. The metal-indicator complex must possess sufficient stability else it would not display a sharp colour change. Further, the metal-indicator complex must be less stable than the metal-EDTA complex. This is to ensure that, at the end point, EDTA is able to remove all the metal ions from the metal indicator-complex. It is desirable that the change in equilibrium from the metal indicator complex to the metal-EDTA complex should be sharp and rapid.
Spectrophotometric Method
In spectrophotometric determinations we study the interaction of radiation with the analyte and measure the extent of radiation absorbed. You would learn in details about spectrophotometric determinations in the Block-1 of the MCH-003 course. The spectrophotometric method of end point determination in complexometric titrations 48
are meaningful when there is a drastic change in the absorption spectrum on the formation of a metal complex between the metal ion and the ligand or when one complex is converted to another. In such cases the end point can be detected more accurately and in relatively dilute solutions as compared to the visual methods. For example, in the titration using disodium EDTA an accurate end point can be obtained when the concentration is of the order of 0.001M. Another advantage of the spectrophotometric determination of the end point is that we can determine the end point of a titration involving a coloured ion without using an indicator. Further, the end point in the titrations involving colourless complexes can also be determined by making spectrophotometric measurements in the ultraviolet region.
Complexometric Titrations
Potentiometric Method
Potentiometric determination of the end point in complexometric titrations can be used only for those ions for which specific ion electrodes are available. This is so because since there is no change in oxidation state during the titration. Therefore a redox couple and a suitable indicator electrode or an ion selective electrode is a prerequisite for the purpose. It is, however, possible in case of some metal ions to perform the titration with a complexing titrant using an indicator electrode constructed from the same metal. The potential at the indicator electrode in such a situation would be determined by the half reaction. M n + + ne M the corresponding potential being given by the following Nernst expression.
0 E = E Mn + / M
0.0592 1 log n [ M n+ ]
A saturated calomel electrode is generally used to complete the cell. As the potential at the indicator electrode depends on the concentration of the free ions whose concentration decreases during the titration, the cell potential also changes. In the vicinity of the equivalence point there is an abrupt change in the pM value which in turn produces an abrupt change in the potential. In some cases, however, a mercury electrode can be made sensitive to EDTA ions and can be used for end point determination as explained under amperometric method.
Amperometric Method
Amperometry is an electroanalytical method of analysis in which the information about the analyte can be obtained by measuring the current developed on a microelectrode as a function of applied potential. The mercury electrode used for following the titration consists of a drop of mercury in contact with the solution containing the metal ion and a drop or two of the solution of Hg (II)-chelate. In case of EDTA as the titrant, the half-cell potential is determined by the Hg/HgY 2 couple. The potential of this couple is altered by the changing concentration of M2+ ions that are being titrated as these also form complex with EDTA.
M n + + HgY 2 MY n 4 + Hg 2+
It can be shown that the potential at the stoichiometric point is determined primarily by the concentration of metal ion being titrated. The concentration of metal ions changes sharply at the stoichiometric point which in turn changes the electrode potential sharply. In general, abrupt potential changes of the order of about 200-250 mV can be easily and accurately detected; more stable the complex, larger is the potential change for the titration. As this indicates the end point, the amount of titrant added till this stage is equivalent to the amount of metal present. You would learn about the technique of amperometric titration in details in Unit 9 of the MCH 004 course.
49
SAQ 4
What are metallochromic indicators? What is the principle of their action? ... ... ... ... ...
Direct Titration: It is the simplest and the most convenient method in which the standard solution of EDTA is slowly added to the metal ion solution till the end point is achieved. It is similar to simple acid-base titrations. For this method to be useful the formation constant must be large and the indicator must provide a very distinct color change as mentioned earlier. Further we need standardized solution of EDTA and sometimes auxiliary complexing agents may be required. Some important elements which could be determined directly by the complexometric titration are Cu, Mn, Ca, Ba, Br, Zn, Cd, Hg, Al, Sn, Pb, Bi, Cr, Mo, Fe, Co, Ni, and Pd, etc. However, the presence of other ions may cause interference and need to be suitably handled. Back Titration: In this method, an excess of a standard solution of EDTA is added to the metal solution being determined so as to complex all the metal ions present in the solution. The excess of EDTA left after the complex formation with the metal is back titrated with a standard solution of a second metal ion. This method becomes necessary if the analyte precipitates in the absence of EDTA or reacts too slowly with EDTA, or it blocks the indicator. For example, determination of Mn is done by this method because a direct titration is not possible due to precipitation of Mn (OH)2 . The excess EDTA remaining after complexation, is back titrated with a standard Zn solution using Eriochrome black T as indicator. However, one has to ensure the standard metal ion should not displace the analyte ion from their EDTA complex. Replacement Titration: When direct or back titrations do not give sharp end points or when there is no suitable indicator for the analyte the metal may be determined by this method. The metal to be analyzed is added to a metal-EDTA complex. The analyte ion (with higher Kf) displaces EDTA from the metal and the metal is subsequently titrated with standard EDTA. For example, in the determination of Mn an excess of Mg EDTA chelate is added to Mn solution. The Mn ions quantitatively displace Mg from Mg-EDTA solution because Mn forms a more stable complex with EDTA.
M n+ + MgY 2 (MY)(n - 4)+ + Mg2+
2.
3.
The freed Mg metal is then directly titrated with a standard solution of EDTA using Eriochrome black T indicator. Ca, Pb and Hg may also be determined by this method.
50
4.
Indirect Titration: Certain anions that form precipitate with metal cations and do not react with EDTA can be analyzed indirectly. The anion is first precipitated with a metal cation and the precipitate is washed and boiled with an excess of disodium EDTA solution to form the metal complex.
Mn+ + H2Y2 (MY)(n - 4)+ + 2H+
Complexometric Titrations
The protons from disodium EDTA are displaced by a heavy metal and titrated with sodium alkali. Therefore, this method is also called alkalimetric titration. For example, barbiturates can be determined by this method.
Use of masking and demasking agents pH control Classical separation Solvent extraction Kinetic masking
51
The strategy of masking and selective demasking can be used for successive titration of a number of metal ions in a mixture. For example, the components of a mixture containing Mg, Zn, and Cu can be determined as per the following strategy. 1. In the first step an excess of standard EDTA is added to the mixture and the remaining EDTA is back titrated with a standard solution of Mg2+ ions using solochrome black as indicator. This provides the sum of the concentrations of all the three metals present. In the second step a portion of the mixture is treated with an excess of KCN so as to mask the Zn and Cu ions in terms of their cyanide complexes. On titration we get the amount of Mg only. In the next phase an excess of chloral hydrate (or a 3:1 solution of formaldehyde and acetic acid) is added to the titrated solution. This liberates the Zn2+ from the cyanide complex. The solution is now titrated until the indicator turns blue. This gives the amount of Zn only. Knowing the amounts of magnesium and zinc, the amount of copper can be determined by subtracting the amounts of Mg and copper from the total amount of the metal ions obtained in step 1.
2.
3.
4.
pH control
This method is based upon the differences in stability of the complexes formed between the metal ions and the chelating agent. As you have learnt earlier, the formation of a metal chelate is dependent on the pH of the reaction medium. In weakly acid solution, the chelates of many metals such as alkaline earth metals are completely dissociated, whereas chelates of Bi, Fe3+ or Cr are readily formed at this pH. Thus, in acidic solution, Bi can be effectively titrated with a chelating agent in the presence of alkaline earth metals. A mixture of bismuth and lead ions can be successfully titrated by first titrating the bismuth at pH 2 with xylenol orange as indicator, and then adding hexamine to raise the pH to about 5, and titrating the lead.
Classical separation
These are attempted only be applied if they are not tedious; further only those precipitates may be used for separations in which, after being re-dissolved, the cations can be determined complexometrically. Some of the examples are CaC2O4, nickel dimethylglyoximate, and CuSCN.
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction may sometimes be employed for selectivity. In this method a metal ion in the mixture can be converted into a complex that can be extracted by a suitable solvent and then determined by EDTA. For example, Zinc can be separated from copper and lead by adding excess of ammonium thiocyanate solution and extracting the resulting zinc thiocyanate with 4-methylpentan-2-one (isobutyl methyl ketone); the extract is diluted with water and the zinc content determined with EDTA solution.
Kinetic masking
This is a special case in which the complexation of metal ion is too slow to be effective. In other words, the metal ion does not form a complex due to its kinetic inertness. For example, the reaction of chromium (III) with EDTA is quite slow. It is, therefore, possible to titrate other metal ions which react rapidly without interference from Cr (III). Determination of iron (III) and chromium (III) in a mixture is a typical example.
52
SAQ 5
Suggest a strategy for the complexometric determination of Zn and Mg in a mixture. ... ... ... ...
Complexometric Titrations
11.6 SUMMARY
Complexometric titrations involve the reaction between the analyte and titrant leading to the formation of a stoichiometric complex that is soluble and stays undissociated. This quantitative reaction forms the basis of extensive applications of complexometric methods. Choosing a suitable complexing agent, selecting a method for the detection of the end point and ascertaining the optimum experimental conditions for the titration are essential steps of a complexometric determination. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, EDTA, is probably the most widely exploited chelating agent in complexometric determinations. It is a hexadentate ligand that forms 1:1 complexes with most of the metal ions. The complex formation is characterised in terms of an equilibrium constant called formation constant whose reciprocal is referred to as instability constant. As EDTA is a hexaprotic acid it dissociates to varying extent at a given pH. The ionic species and their concentration at a given pH affect the formation constants of different complexes. To account for these we have to use conditional formation constants. In addition to the pH of the medium, the presence of other complexing agents also affects the metal ligand equilibria and need to be considered. The titration curve for the metal EDTA titration has three characteristic regions, the initial region where there is an excess of the metal ion the inflection region corresponding to the equivalence or end point and the third region where there is an excess of the titrant EDTA. The jump or the rise in the pM value around the equivalence point depends on many factors like the stabilities of the metal indicator and metal EDTA complexes. The equivalence point of the titration is usually detected with a metallochromic indicator that responds to change in metal ion concentration. The equivalence point is indicated by a change in the colour of the indicator. In addition, we may resort to instrumental methods like spectrophotometric, potentiometric and conductometric methods for the end point determination. The versatility of EDTA as a chelating titrant has been used in innumerable complexometric determinations. The complexometric titration involving EDTA can be executed in a number of possible ways that leads to its extensive applications. EDTA is a very unselective reagent as it complexes with a wide variety of metal ions. However, it is possible to achieve some kind of selectivity by exploiting the differences in the stabilities of its complexes with different metal ions. Some of the strategies are use of masking and demasking agents, pH control, classical separation, solvent extraction and kinetic masking.
53
3. 4. 5. 6.
Lead-EDTA chelate having the formula PbY 2 has a formation constant of 1.1 1014. Compute the conditional formation constants at a pH = 10. What are the essential requirements for a metallochromic indicator to be used for complexometric titrations? You may use Table 11.2 for the required data. What is the principle of spectrophotometric determination of end point in complexometric titrations? Explain with the help of a suitable example, the masking-demasking method of estimating different ions in a mixture by titrating against EDTA.
11.8 ANSWERS
Self Assessment Questions
1. Denticity of a ligand refers to the number of bonds formed by it with the metal atom/ion in a complex. At a pH of more than 10 the carboxyl groups and the substituted amino functional groups are expected to be ionised. Accordingly the given ligand would have a denticity of six or in other words it would act as a hexadentate ligand. Cd2+ ions form a series of complexes with ammonia. The equations for the complex formations and the corresponding stepwise formation constants are as follows.
Cd (NH 3 ) 2+ (aq)
K1 =
K2 =
2.
Cd 2+ (aq) + NH 3 (aq)
Cd (NH3
Cd
)2+
Cd
(NH3 )2+ 2
(aq)
[Cd (NH 3 ) ] [ NH 3 ]
2+
2+ (NH3 )2
Cd
2+ (NH3 )3
(aq)
K3 =
Cd
(NH3 )42+
(aq)
K4 =
[Cd(NH3 )2 + ] 4
2 [Cd(NH3 )3 + ][ NH3 ]
[Cd (NH 3 )4 ]
2+
[Cd 2 + ] [ NH 3 ]
[Cd (NH 3 ) 2+ ] 4
2 [Cd (NH 3 )3 + ] [NH 3 ]
Cancelling the terms in the numerator and denominator, we get the following.
= 4
54
3.
Ag (NH2CH2CH2NH2)
Ag+
+ NH2CH2CH2NH2
Complexometric Titrations
0.1 0.1 x
0
x
0.1 0.1 + x
Kd =
1 1 = = 2 10 5 K f 5.0 10 4
x (0.1 + x) (0.1 x)
As the Kd value is small we can ignore x in comparison to 0.1, we get the following.
=
4.
x (0.1) = x = 2 10 5 (0.1)
Metallochromic indicators or metal ion indicators are the compounds that are capable of forming a complex with the metal ion being determined and can be used to determine the end point in the complexometric determination of the metal ions. The metal-indicator complex has a lower stability constant than the titrant-metal complex and has an intense color which is distinctly different from the uncomplexed indicator. In the beginning of the titration the indicator forms a complex with the metal ion and the solution bears the metal-indicator complex colour. When the titrant, EDTA is added it complexes with the free metal ion till they are present and thereafter the titrant displaces the indicator from the metalindicator complex and the colour of solution changes indicating the end point in the titration.
5.
A mixture of Zn and Mg can be determined by using back titration and masking. An excess of standard EDTA can be added to the mixture and the remaining EDTA is back titrated with a standard solution of Mg2+ ions using solochrome black as indicator. This provides the sum of the concentrations of all the two metals present. Thereafter a portion of the mixture can be treated with an excess of KCN so as to mask the Zn as its cyanide complex and the amount of magnesium can be determined by titration with EDTA.
Terminal Questions
1. The key steps in designing a typical complexometric determination are as follows.
choosing a suitable complexing agent choosing a suitable method of detecting the end point choosing the experimental conditions that provide an optimum titration
2.
It is true that EDTA is a versatile complexometric agent and has been extensively exploited for quantitative determinations of the metal ions. However, it cannot be used for the direct analysis of anions or neutral ligands. We know that, K f' = Y 4 K f The value of Y 4 at a pH of 10 = 0.36 and the value of K f = 1.1 1018 => K 'f = 0.36 1.1 1018 = 3.96 1017
3.
4.
In order to be used as a metallochromic indicator in complexometric titrations it should meet the following requirements. 55
The colour contrast between the free and the metal-bound indicator complex should be readily observable. The colour reaction should be specific or selective. The metal-indicator complex must possess sufficient stability and it must be less stable than the metal-EDTA complex. The change in equilibrium from the metal indicator complex to the metalEDTA complex should be sharp and rapid. The colour reaction must occur before the end point when nearly all the metal ion is complexed with EDTA.
5.
The spectrophotometric method of end point determination in complexometric titrations is based on the change in absorption spectrum on the formation of a complex between the metal ion and the ligand or the conversion of one complex to another. In this method of determination of more than one metal ion in a mixture thereof, generally one of the metal ions is made to react with a suitable reagent called masking agent such that the metal ion is so transformed that it does not participate in the reaction. The other ions are then determined. The masked ion can then be demasked and determined. For example, a mixture of Zn and Mg can be titrated by treating the mixture with KCN which would form a complex with Zn ion and the magnesium ions can be titrated with EDTA. The masked Zn ions can be librated or demasked by treating with aldehydes such as formaldehyde and titrated with EDTA.
6.
56
Complexometric Titrations
57
INDEX
Acetic acid 22 Acetonitrile 22 Acidic medium 24 Alkalimetric titration 51 Ambidentate ligands 35 Amperometric method 49 Apparent 43 Applications of complexometric titrations 50
Selectivity in complexometric titrations 51
Masking and demasking 51 Ph control 52 Classical separation 52 Solvent extraction 52 Kinetic masking 52
Back titration 50 Basicity of the ligand 38 Binuclear complex 36 Cell potential 11 Cerium (IV) salts 24 Characteristics of common nonaqueous solvents 22 Chelates 35 Chelating agent 35 Chilometric 36 Chromium (II) and titanium (III) 28 Classical separation 52 Complex 34 Complexometric 36 Conditional stability constant 43 Coordination compound 34 Criteria for solvent selection 21 Cumulative formation constants 37 Denticity 34 Determination of equivalence point 46
Metallochromic indicators 46 Instrumental methods of end point detection 48
Didentate 34 Dimethylformamide: 23 Dimethylsulphoxide 23 Diphenylamine 20 Direct titration 50 Dissociation constant 37 EDTA titrations 36 EDTA titrations and ph 41 EDTA-an important chelating agent 39 Effect of other complexing agents 44 Electrochemical cells 9
Nernst equation 10 Cell potential 11 Redox equilibrium constant 13
Electron transfer reactions 6 Equilibria involved in Edta titrations 40 Factors affecting stability of metal-ligand complexes 38 Faradays constant 10
58
Formation constant 36 Galvanic cell 10 Half reaction 11 Indirect titration 50 Instrumental methods of end point detection 48 Iodimetry 28 Iodine 27 Iodometry 28 Iron 28 Kinetic masking 52 Ligands 34 Masking and demasking 51 Metal carbonyl 34 Metal-ligand complexes 34 Metal-EDTA titration curves 45 Metal-ligand equilibrium 36 Metallochromic indicators 46 Nature of the ligand 38 Nature of the metal ion 38 Nernst equation 10 Neutral medium 24 Normal hydrogen electrode 7 Number of metal chelate rings 38 Overall 37 Oxidimetric 23 Oxidimetric reagents 24 Oxidising agents 6 Ph control 52 Pm 45 Polydentate ligand 34 Polynuclear complex 36 Potassium bromate 25 Potassium dichromate 25 Potassium iodate 26 Potassium permanganate 24 Potentiometric method 49 Principles of complexometric titrations 39
EDTA: an important chelating agent 39 Equilibria involved in EDTA titrations 40 EDTA titrations and pH 41 Effect of other complexing agents 44 Metal-EDTA titration curves 45
Complexometric Titrations
Reaction at anode 12 Reaction at cathode 11 Redox equilibrium constant 13 Redox indicators 18 Redox potential 7 Redox reaction as two half reactions 6 Redox reactions 6 Redox reactions and redox potential 6 Redox titration curves 14 Redox titrations in nonaqueous solvents 21
Criteria for solvent selection 21 Characteristics of common nonaqueous solvents 22
Selectivity in complexometric titrations 51 Sequestering agents 36 Significance of redox potentials 7 Size of chelate ring 38 Solvent extraction 52 Spectrophotometric method 48 Standard redox potential 7 Standard reduction potential 7 Stepwise formation constants 37 Steric effects 38 Unidentate ligand 34
60