Your Learning Objectives: Chapter 1: Operations Management
Your Learning Objectives: Chapter 1: Operations Management
Namely to introduce some of the basic ideas in operations management and provide some examples to illustrate them. It introduces the general model of operations management which is used to link together the different topics in operations management and the different parts of the book. There is nothing sacrosanct about this model; other books will use slightly different models. What is important is that you realise that it combines two distinct ideas. The first idea is that all types of business, organisation or enterprise, large or small, profit making or not-for-profit, .... are processes. This is illustrated by the input resources and output products and services arrows. The second idea is that, to make these process work, operations managers do things such as devising strategy, designing processes, planning and controlling processes, and improving them. So, operations managers in all types of operation .... have a common set of activities. This idea is illustrated in the model by the activities in the ovals.
Operations management is the term used for the activities which produce and deliver products and services. The important things to remember about operations management are, All types of organisation must do operations management because all organisations produce some mixture of products and services. Remember though that in many
organisations the term operations management will not be used. In many smaller organisations operations management may be done by people who perform many other types of task such as marketing and accounting. Operations management is important. The decisions it makes have a major impact on both the cost of producing products or services and how well the products and services are produced and delivered which has a major impact on the revenue coming into the organisation. So, operations management has an important impact on both revenue and cost and therefore profits. This also applies to not-for-profit organisations. In a local government service, for example, good operations management can produce services which satisfy the community and are produced efficiently. So the community are getting value for money from their local services. Operations management has strategic importance. The box on IKEA in the text illustrates a company which has been strategically successful because of the way it manages its operations.
Types of staff
On-board shop assistants Cleaners Maintenance staff Ticketing staff Transformed resources in operations are some mixture of materials, information and customers. The important issue here is that, although most types of operation process all three types of transformed resource, one is usually the most important. So, for example, a hospital will process information in the form of patients medical records. It will also devote some of its resources to processing materials, for example in the way it produces meals for patients. The main operations task of a hospital, however, is to process customers in a way which satisfies its patients, maximises their health care and minimises its costs. It is predominantly a customer processing operation. Similarly, most operations produce some mixture of products and services. This emphasises one of the core philosophies of this text book.. The distinction between manufacturing and service is becoming increasingly irrelevant. Even government statistics cannot cope with the distinction any longer. For example, if you buy software on a disc it is classed as a product, but if you download it over the internet (legally of course) it is classed as a service.
Business process reengineering is more radical and advocates that all the resources and activities necessary to do everything required for an end-to-end business process should be put within the same unit or department. In other words, the organisation should be reconfigured around these key processes.
Physical buffering Physical buffering involves building up a store of the resources so that any supply disruptions will (initially at least) be absorbed by the store. The operation is storing its input transformed resources before it transforms them. The store of input resources are being used as buffer stocks to protect the operation. Similarly, buffering can be applied at the output end of the transformation process. A manufacturer could make its products and put them into a finished goods inventory (output stocks are not usually relevant to people-processing operations). Often operations do not need to have output stocks; they could react to each customers request as it was made. Yet by stocking their output, the operation is given much more stability when demand is uncertain. Organizational buffering In many organizations the responsibility for acquiring the inputs to the operation and distributing its outputs to customers is not given to the operations function. For example, the people who staff the operation are recruited and trained by the personnel function; the process technology for the operation is probably selected and commissioned by a technical function; the materials, parts, services and other bought-in resources are acquired through a purchasing function; and the orders from customers which trigger the operation into activity will come through the marketing function. The other functions of the organization are, in effect, forming a barrier or buffer between the uncertainties of the environment and the operations function. These relationships have developed partly for stability which allows the operation to organize itself for maximum efficiency. CRITICAL COMMENTARY The whole concept of buffering the operations function is not without its critics. Buffering may promote stability but, partly due to the influence of Japanese operations practice, we can now see several problems with over-protecting operations from their environment:
The time lag of communicating between the insulating function and the operations function slows down decision-making. By the time the insulating function has responded, operations has moved on to the next problem. Operations which never interact with the environment never develop an understanding of the environment (e.g. labour or technological markets) which would help them exploit new developments. Operations managers are not required to take responsibility for their actions. There is always another function to blame. Physical buffering often involves tolerating large stocks of input or output resources. These are both expensive (see Chapter 12, Inventory planning and control) and prevent the operation improving (see Chapter 15, Just-in-time planning and control). Physical buffering in customer-processing operations means making the customer wait for service, which in turn could lead to customer dissatisfaction.
For all of these reasons, it is better gradually to expose the operations function to its environment. Only then will it learn to develop the necessary flexibility to respond to and understand what is really happening with its customers and suppliers. The approach which many companies have taken to the idea of buffering their operations says a lot about how the role of operations management has changed over the last few years. Traditionally, operations managers were seen as being unable to cope with disruption from outside the organisation. Wildly fluctuating demand levels required physical buffering in the form of finished product inventories so that demand could be satisfied, even if the operation could not flex its output levels to cope with changing demand. Nor were operations regarded as being capable of expertise outside their core area of producing goods and services. So, for example, a personnel department would deal with the labour market, recruit staff and look after much of their welfare while they worked in the operation. While operations are still buffered in most organisations, it happens far less. As the text discusses, this is because over protecting an operation can deprive it of an opportunity to learn how to cope with changes in the business environment, or learn the skills necessary to manage its own resources (people are an important part of any operation, why should not operations managers take an active part in their welfare rather than personnel managers?). The two figures below illustrate the idea of physical buffering and organisational buffering.
The figure below gives some examples of operations at each end of these four dimensions. In most industries one can find examples at either end of each dimension. So, for example, in transport, a taxi service is low volume while a bus service or mass rapid transport is high volume. In accounting firms, corporate tax advice is high variety because all large corporations have different needs, while financial audits, which have to be carried out to comply with financial reporting legislation, are relatively standardised. In food manufacture, the demand for ice-cream varies considerably depending on the weather, while the demand for bread is far steadier and more predictable. In the dental care industry, dentists operate high visibility operations (its difficult to work on your teeth if you are not there) but rely on dental technicians in factory-type laboratories to make false teeth etc.
These dimensions are most useful in predicting how easy it is for an operation to operate at low cost. Figure 1.10 in the text indicates that operations whose profiles occupy the right-hand extreme of the dimensions (high volume, low variety, low variation and low visibility) tend to operate at lower cost than those at the other end of the dimensions. When operations processes do differ they do so mainly in terms of their volume, variety, variation and visibility. But not everyone agrees that these dimensions are sufficient. Operations processes, they say, differ in far more ways that the four Vs suggest. At the very least more dimensions are needed, for example the relative complexity which processes have to cope with, or the degree of discretion or decision making required by the staff with the process, or the risk of things going wrong in the process, or the value of each product or service produced, and so on.
Naturally the vast majority of Slack et al is concerned with the direct responsibilities of operations managers. All other text books in this area take the same approach. However, both the indirect responsibilities of communicating with other functions and (especially) the broad responsibilities are becoming increasingly important to operations managers. This relates back to the idea of buffering. As the traditional barriers between the operations function and the other functions of the business and the business environment in general are being lowered, so operations manager must make decisions in the light of the their internal and external
environments.
Source: De Meyer A. (1993) Creating the Virtual Factor, EFME Conference, LBS.