0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views

Transcriptjc

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE KAMBULOW VS TACF ET ALL MOTION BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CLARKE ON THE 15TH OF JANUARY, 2008 AT MILTON ONTARIO

Uploaded by

walthope
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
111 views

Transcriptjc

SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE KAMBULOW VS TACF ET ALL MOTION BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CLARKE ON THE 15TH OF JANUARY, 2008 AT MILTON ONTARIO

Uploaded by

walthope
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 39
ag aq 3.007 (1284) SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN WALTER KAMBULOW Plaintiff = and - TORONTO AIRPORT CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP JOHN ARNOTT and STEPHEN LONG Defendants MOTION before the Honourable Mr. Justice Clarke on the 15% of January, 2008 at Milton, Ontario APPEARANCES W. KAMBULOW Self represented P. MIEHLS Counsel for the defendants 1d 1 | as 1 Kambulow v Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship et al JANUARY 15, 2008 THE COURT: Counsel, are you here on a case? MS. MIEHLS: Yes, I am. THE COURT: What are case are you acting for? MS. MIERLS: I’m acting for Toronto Airport on the first matter, Toronto Airport... THE COURT: Sir, what's your name? MR. KAMBULOW: Walter Kambulow. THE COURT: Oh, yes, sir. All right. I’ve gone through the file. Take a seat, sir. You're Patricia... MS. MIEHLS: Pamela Miehls, Your Honour. THE COURT: I’m sorry. MS. MIEHLS: That’s okay. THE COURT: You're Pamela... MS. MIEHLS: Miehls. THE COURT: ...Miehls - M-E.. MS. MIEHLS: M-I-E-H-L-s. THE COURT: Miehls. MS. MIEHLS: Yes. THE COURT: Ms. Miehls, I’ve gone through the file and I’ve looked at the nature of the - actually, there are two files, there are two actions, actually, one is a Statement of Claim in Toronto.... MS. MIEHLS: Correct. THE COURT: -.and there's Statement of Claim in Milton. And I’ve read the allegations made by the Plaintiff, Mr. Kambulow, and I’ve read the 15) 2 2 EN oer 1298 Kambulow v Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship et al allegations made - your position on all of this. MS. MIEHLS: Correct. THE COURT: And I note that the action in Toronto was started on October the 18" and then on the 29 of October the second action was started here in Milton, and I note too that you've got a motion for injunction and contempt combined now for the 13” of I think, February, isn’t it. MS. MIEHLS: That’s correct. THE COURT: ...in Toronto? MS. MIEHLS: Right. THE COURT: And to cut to the chase I’m going to hear you out if you have anything to say about this. I know you're seeking to strike out the Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim today... MS. MIEHLS: Correct. THE COURT: ...but I’m very loathe to do that. But I am very, very open to the idea of consolidating this matter and moving them to Toronto... MS. MIEHLS: Okay. THE COURT: ...because I do think that they interweave, and subject to what you say I think it’s in the interest of justice that they be consolidated. Now, do you disagree with that? MS. MIEHLS: No, I completely agree with the fact that the matter should be transferred to Toronto if it still stands. THE COURT: You want me to strike out his claim today. MS. MIEHLS: I want you to strike out the claim

You might also like