CGA November 2010 Answers
CGA November 2010 Answers
SECTION A
Answer to Question One Requirement (a)
Direct labour cost: Introduction stage The learning curve applies throughout this stage, therefore: Y = ax
b
Y = $100,000 x 10
-0.4150
= $38,459
Therefore total direct labour cost = 10 x $38,459 = $384,590 Growth stage The learning curve continues for another 20 batches so the direct labour cost of these 20 batches is: Y = ax
b
Y = $100,000 x 30
-0.4150
= $24,378
Total direct labour cost for first 30 batches = 30 x $24,378 = $731,340 Less: Total direct labour cost for first 10 batches = 10 x $38,459 = $384,590 Therefore total direct labour cost for these 20 batches = $346,750 The direct labour cost of each of the other 10 batches in this stage is the same as that of the thirtieth batch:
November 2010
Direct labour cost of the thirtieth batch: Average cost for first 29 batches: Y = ax
b
Y = $100,000 x 29
-0.4150
= $24,723
Total direct labour cost for first 30 batches = 30 x $24,378 = $731,340 Total direct labour cost for first 29 batches = 29 x $24,723 = $716,967 Direct labour cost for the thirtieth batch = $14,373 Therefore the direct labour cost for these 10 batches = 10 x $14,373 = $143,730 Therefore the total direct labour cost for this stage of the product life cycle is $490,480 Maturity Stage The learning curve has now ended so the direct labour cost of these 60 batches will be: 60 batches x $14,373 = $862,380 Decline Stage The learning curve has now ended so the direct labour cost of these 30 batches will be: 30 batches x $14,373 = $431,190
Requirement (b)
Introduction Sales units Selling price Sales revenue Direct labour Direct materials Other Profit 10000 $120 $ 1,200,000 384,590 500,000 100,000 215,410 Growth 30000 $100 $ 3,000,000 490,480 1,500,000 300,000 709,520 Maturity 60000 $80 $ 4,800,000 862,380 3,000,000 600,000 337,620 Decline 30000 $50 $ 1,500,000 431,190 1,500,000 300,000 (731,190) 531,360
Requirement (c)
ZTG requires a 20% return on its average investment. Average investment = ($5m + $3m) / 2 = $4m Profit target is therefore 20% of $4m = $800,000 As shown in the answer to (b) above the profit predicted without the experience curve is $268,640 less than that required. Total production throughout the product life cycle = 130 batches. Currently the total direct material cost throughout the product life cycle = $6.5m. This needs to be reduced by $268,640 to $6,231,360 which is an average direct material cost per batch of $47.934.
November 2010
Requirement (d)
The concept of life cycle costing is that the costs and revenues of a product are accumulated over its life cycle and its overall profitability is measured, rather than separating costs and revenues into accounting periods. In this scenario the length of the product life cycle is 12 months but this may or may not coincide with the companys accounting year and the statement shown in solution (b) above shows the products profitability over its life cycle. As illustrated in the scenario to this question there are four recognised stages in the life cycle of a product. In this scenario it appears that ZTG is using a market skimming approach to the initial launch pricing of its product because it is starting with a high price in the introduction stage that is then being gradually reduced over the life cycle of the product. ZTG will be reducing the price of the product in order to make it harder for competitors to enter the market but also to increase the demand for its product through the growth stage. At this time the cost of the product will also be lower than at the launch stage, due to the effect of the learning and experience curves on its direct labour and material costs. In the maturity stage, ZTG will reduce the selling price further to consolidate its sales and would hope that there may be further cost savings due to economies of scale though these are not evident from the data in this scenario. Finally, in the decline stage, ZTG reduces the price to maintain sales while under more competition from newer products, prior to launching a new product of its own.
November 2010
Requirement (b)
There are a number of different tools and techniques that Mr G could use to assist him in planning the shopping centre project. For example: Work Breakdown Structure. This technique is a critical part of project planning involving an analysis of the work required to complete the Shopping Centre project. The activities in the project are broken down into manageable components, referred to as work packages. The process defines the activities that must be carried out for each work 4
November 2010
package. Each work package will have defined responsibilities and deliverables for the shopping centre project that Mr G can delegate. The analysis of activities for the shopping centre project can be undertaken at a number of levels, for example starting with the major phases then breaking them down into more detailed sub-activities. Mr G would be able to develop a task list from the work breakdown structure to assist in planning, control and monitoring the various stages of the project. The work breakdown structure can, therefore, assist in identifying the people responsible for each activity or work package. Another widely used project planning tool is the Gantt Chart. This provides a visual way of illustrating the sequence of activities in a project. Complex project activities are converted into constituent tasks and a graphical and understandable picture is provided. Although it does not show dependencies and internal relationships, it is a helpful framework in the planning of construction projects, such as the shopping centre development. It will show the time taken for each activity and the resources required, hence can be used to monitor progress against the plan and assist project scheduling by planning the timescales for the project. It can also be used by Mr G to communicate the responsibilities of tasks to the project team. A variation of the Gantt chart is the resource histogram which shows the resource requirement usage and availability against a timescale. This will help Mr G in the scheduling and rescheduling of resources for the shopping centre project. Network analysis, sometimes referred to as critical path analysis, is an important technique in project planning, providing a diagram showing the sequence and dependencies between activities or deliverables on a project. Using a work breakdown structure, network analysis arranges each work package/task into a logical sequence, and estimates the time to complete each. The outputs from the work breakdown structure analysis will help the identification of which tasks are dependent on others. Dependencies are critical to project planning. Simplistically, this involves determining the sequence, i.e. if activity B can only begin when activity A is completed there is a dependency. For example, planning permission must be sought for the shopping centre before construction work can commence. This is a crucial activity in project planning and the allocation of resources. Having identified dependencies, it is then possible to calculate the critical path, which is the longest sequence of consecutive activities. It identifies those activities which, if delayed beyond the allotted time, would delay the completion of the shopping centre project and identifies how much float time there is on other tasks. In other words, by how much certain activities could slip before there is an impact on the expected time completion for the shopping centre project. This then enables the minimum possible time to be determined, and can be helpful in identifying where there is some slack time available within the project plan for any unforeseen circumstances. Another project technique is PERT (project evaluation and review technique). This is a development on network analysis that Mr G might find helpful in project planning. The technique is designed to account for uncertainty in the project lifecycle. For each activity in the project PERT uses three time estimates: and the optimistic time based on the duration the shopping centre project would take if conditions were ideal; the most likely/probable duration if conditions were normal or as expected; the pessimistic estimates which is the duration it would take if a number of things went wrong.
November 2010
These estimates are then converted into a mean time and standard deviation which means it is then possible to establish the duration of the shopping centre project using the expected times, but also to calculate a contingency time allowance.
November 2010
5,091 589 5,680 5,398 603 6,001 $000 2,880 40 years 72 30 $000 8,400 1,926
November 2010
W3 Gain on disposal of AC Fair value of consideration received Plus fair value of 105,000 shares retained Less share (75%) of fair value of consolidated carrying value of the subsidiary at date control is lost: Share capital (300 x 75%) Reserves 75% x ($3,900,000 + ($2,127,000 x 9/12)) Unimpaired goodwill Gain on sale W4 Goodwill on acquisition of AC Fair value of consideration transferred Non-controlling interest at proportionate share of net assets Net assets at acquisition: Share capital Reserves Goodwill
$000
225 4,122 420 (4,767) 489 $000 $000 2,940 840 3,780
W5 - Recycling of previously recognised gains of $120,000 from reserves to administrative expenses, recorded as Dr reserves Cr administrative expenses.
W6 Non-controlling interests Profit for the year $000 2,520 (72) 2,448 204 2,052 385 589 Total comprehensive income $000 2,520 (72) 2,448 204 2,127 399 603
As per MC accounts Additional dep'n of FV 20% NCI x 5/12 months As per AC accounts 25% NCI x 9/12 months Total NCI in PFY Total NCI in TCI
November 2010
SECTION B
The answer is C
4.2
Mark up
25% =
19.2%
Fixed cost/unit at breakeven sales level Selling price/unit - fixed cost/unit Options Selling price Variable cost Contribution Sales (units) Total contribution ($m) Fixed costs Profit ($m) $ 21 11 10 266,000 2.66 (1.4) 1.26
$1.4m/100,000 units = $14/unit $25 - $14 = $11/unit variable cost $ 25 11 14 185,000 2.59 (1.4) 1.19 $ 30 11 19 135,000 2.565 (1.4) 1.165
The answer is B 4.4 The answer is B Dual-rate transfer prices will reduce divisional incentives to compete effectively. The supplying division can easily generate internal sales to the receiving division when it is charged at variable cost; this protects it from competition and gives it little incentive to improve its productivity. 4.5 4.6 4.7 The answer is D - Hierarchies or markets The answer is B - Supervision Resource based view
November 2010
4.8
4.9
Non-current assets are recorded at the spot rate at the date of transaction and not retranslated (250,000/0.741 = $337,382). Trade payables are restated at the closing rate as payables are a monetary item (250,000/0.753 = $332,005). The answer is B
4.10 Post tax earnings ($450,000 - 110,000) Weighted avarage number of shares in issue: 1 May - 30 September 3 million x 5/12 months 1 October - 30 April 4 million x 7/12 months $340,000 1,250,000 2,333,333 3,583,333 9.5 cents per share
Basic earnings per share $340,000/3,583,333 The answer is 9.5 cents per share
4.11 The non-current assets of one entity could be nearing the end of their useful life and therefore be unrealistically low giving a higher non-current asset turnover figure. Alternatively, the non-current assets of one entity could have been revalued which would result in asset turnover being low but not necessarily because of low efficiency. 4.12 The bond purchased by NBW should be classified as a held to maturity investment as NBW intends to hold it to redemption. It is initially recorded at the net cost of $4.5 million and then subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate. The closing balance of the liability at 30 June 2010 is $4,711.7, see working below: Opening balance $000 4,500 10.26% effective rate $000 461.7 Coupon interest paid $000 (250) Closing balance $000 4,711.7
10
November 2010