0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views

Ae Datacollection Methods Lols

This document provides an overview of common data collection methods, including their appropriate uses, strengths, and weaknesses. It discusses archival data, modified archival data, observations, surveys/questionnaires, focus groups, interviews, and provides tips for selecting the best method. The strengths of archival data include being easy and cost-effective, while weaknesses include difficulty collecting multi-site data. Surveys allow efficient collection of attitudes from many respondents but qualitative data can be difficult to aggregate. Focus groups capture interactions but require a trained moderator.

Uploaded by

黄仁衛
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views

Ae Datacollection Methods Lols

This document provides an overview of common data collection methods, including their appropriate uses, strengths, and weaknesses. It discusses archival data, modified archival data, observations, surveys/questionnaires, focus groups, interviews, and provides tips for selecting the best method. The strengths of archival data include being easy and cost-effective, while weaknesses include difficulty collecting multi-site data. Surveys allow efficient collection of attitudes from many respondents but qualitative data can be difficult to aggregate. Focus groups capture interactions but require a trained moderator.

Uploaded by

黄仁衛
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Guide to Data Collection Methods

Method
Archival Data

Appropriate Uses
Longitudinal observations, questions looking at trends

Strengths
Easy, cost-effective, credible Provides quantitative data Historical context of the program

Weaknesses
Difficulty in collecting multi-site data Can become expensive Poorly maintained databases can cause problems

Modified Archival Data

See archival data, with added benefit of having evaluation-specific data collected Natural setting Capture detailed descriptions of day-to-day Capture program-context behavior Capture unintended consequences Interaction between participants Greater honesty in responses/less influence of social desirability Obtain input from a large sample on Allows for more respondents to participate attitudes, goals or priorities Relatively efficient data collection Easy aggregation of data Provides data relatively quickly and Poll group as a way of collecting information inexpensively (faster results) on feelings on issues Exploration of unanticipated issues Provide insights about the effects, Insight into the respondents' ways of advantages, and limitations of a program thinking after implementation Allows for reaction and interaction between Initial step in survey research to generate participants topics, questions, and response options Corroborate & interpret survey findings Exploration of unanticipated issues Allows for obtaining real examples and stories Exploration of unanticipated issues Gather in-depth perspectives from individuals Insight into the respondents' ways of thinking Can address sensitive topics

Observations

Qualitative data can be difficult/timeconsuming to aggregate Hard to develop a sound, reliable instrument Data may be difficult to interpret if questions were not clear/straight-forward Issues with primacy effect Risk moderator bias - might give cues towards desirable responses Requires a trained moderator Issues with social desirability Limited generalizability of the results Can not address sensitive topics Qualitative data can be difficult/timeconsuming to aggregate Time-consuming and expensive Qualitative data can be difficult/timeconsuming to aggregate Issues with social desirability Limited generalizability of the results Issues with recency effect

Surveys/Questionnaires

Focus Groups

Interviews

QUICK TIP #1: If you design a survey with many open-ended questions, consider using interviews or a focus group instead - Select between interviews and focus groups depending on your timeline for data collection and analysis, the nature of questions/sensitivity of topics, and the need for in-depth case studies or consensus opinions QUICK TIP #2: When possible, utilize multiple data collection methods (mixed method studies) or longitudinal data to triangulate your results across data points Lisa O'Leary Shuler Teaching & Learning Laboratory, MIT 7/15/2009

You might also like