Description: Tags: Summary
Description: Tags: Summary
S ummary o f Meeting
February 7, 2006, Seattle
A variety of topics and emotions were presented in a two-part hearing of A National Dialogue: The Secretary
of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education on February 7 in Seattle. Leading educational
experts spoke passionately of innovative programs and policies to improve higher education while college
students described their struggles to pay for school and fervently sought an expanded federal role in
financial aid. The testimony was widespread but dutifully reflected the central task of the Commission—to
develop a comprehensive strategy for higher education that recognizes diversity and addresses the future
economic and workforce needs of America. U.S. Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings announced the
formation of the Commission last September and requested a final report with “bold” recommendations in
August. Commission members attending were Mr. Richard Stephens of The Boeing Company, who served
as acting chair; Dr. Richard Vedder of Ohio University; Dr. James Duderstadt of the University of Michigan;
Dr. Robert Mendenhall of Western Governors College, and Ms. Sara Martinez Tucker of the Hispanic
Scholarship Fund. The goal of this session was to hear prepared testimony, then open the proceedings to
the community at large.
Vedder: Should we be doing more online things with bright kids in their junior and senior years in high
school, encouraging them to attend universities early?
Smith: The divide between high school and college is a foolish device. The more we look at institutions that
are a combination and the more we can use the technology to bridge that, I think the better off.
Remarks by Dr. Pam Tate, President, Council for Adult and Experiential Learning
Tate said the Commission must pay attention to adult learners because they are 45 percent of
undergraduate students and future workforce demands make them valuable assets. Regarding affordability,
she said a national survey shows only 35 percent of some 7,000 employers offered tuition assistance. She
recommended employing “a social marketing campaign” to get small and mid-sized businesses and industry
more involved in higher education.
Tucker: Have you found a difference between adult learners retraining for better or different jobs and those
making their way to higher education for the first time?
Tate: Yes. We see a very different kind of support needed for people coming to education for the first time.
A lot are lacking the most basic skills necessary for success in college; whereas those who are returning for
retraining at least have a level of skill and knowledge they can bring to the table.
Anderson explained the “tremendous potential” of applied Garrett Havens, student, Eastern Washington University:
technology to the classroom. He cited the following examples: The number of hours students are working is not conducive to a
The Tutored Video Instruction, which facilitates discussion with proper and healthy education . . . (expanding) federal grants is a
pre-recorded, archival material, and Digital Study Hall, which necessary component to addressing this concern.”
uses low-cost digital technology to show educational content.
Anderson’s current project uses networked devices such as Kathryn Gymann, student, Lane Community College:
PDAs and laptops to enhance traditional instruction. “Student aid is evaporating before our eyes. We can protect our
education by investing more grant and aid and cheaper loans for
Vedder: Will the higher education community, with its lack of college students.”
incentive to change, utilize technology?