0% found this document useful (0 votes)
305 views

Checking For Understanding - Formative Assessment Techniques For Your Classroom

This document provides an overview of effective strategies for checking student understanding. It discusses the importance of formative assessment and describes several oral and questioning techniques teachers can use to monitor comprehension, including accountable talk, think-pair-share, and using response cards, hand signals, or audience response systems to solicit responses from all students. The goal of formative assessment is to identify and address misunderstandings in real-time to improve learning.

Uploaded by

rckerns
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
305 views

Checking For Understanding - Formative Assessment Techniques For Your Classroom

This document provides an overview of effective strategies for checking student understanding. It discusses the importance of formative assessment and describes several oral and questioning techniques teachers can use to monitor comprehension, including accountable talk, think-pair-share, and using response cards, hand signals, or audience response systems to solicit responses from all students. The goal of formative assessment is to identify and address misunderstandings in real-time to improve learning.

Uploaded by

rckerns
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

CheckingforUnderstanding

FormativeAssessmentTechniquesforYourClassroom ByDouglasFisher&NancyFrey

ChapterOne WhyCheckforUnderstanding?
Mostlikelyapersonspeakingmostlikelycheckedseveraltimesduringthelecturebyusing commonpromptsasAnyquestion?Didyouallgetthat?Everybodyunderstand?orDoes thatmakesense?Ratherthanrespondtothesequestions,mostlearnerswillsetquietly,and thelecturerdoesntknowwhethertheyunderstand,theyaretooconfusedtoanswer,they thinktheygetit,ortheyaretooembarrassedtoshowtheirlackofunderstandinginfronof others.Suchgeneralquestionsaresimplynotsufficientindeterminingwhetherornot studentsgetit. WhatisCheckingforUnderstanding? Isanimportantstepintheteachingandlearningprocess.Unlessyoucheckforunderstanding, itisdifficulttoknowexactlywhatstudentsaregettingoutofthelesson.Researchsuggestsitis importanttoidentifyandconfrontmisconceptionsthatcaninterferewithlearning.Theis processcorrectsmisconceptionsandimproveslearning.Italsoprovidesamodelforgoodstudy skills.Whenteacherscheckforunderstandingthenstudentsbecomemoreawareofhowthey shouldbeselfregulatingthemselves. WhatCheckingforUnderstandingisNot Itisnotthefinalexamorstateachievementtests.Thesearesummativeinnatureandnot whatthisisabout.Itisasystematicapproachtoformativeassessment.Itisforteachersto providestudentfeedbackthroughouttheteachingandlearningprocess.Teachersshouldbe checkingforunderstandingevery15minutes. HowisCheckingforUnderstandingRelatedtoOtherTeachingInitiatives? UnderstandingbyDesign:AsignificantpartoftheUnderstandingbyDesignmodelcenterson theuseofassessmentsthatfocusonstudentunderstanding,WigginsandMcTigheBecause understandingdevelopsasaresultofongoinginquiryandrethinking,theassessmentof understandingshouldbethoughtofintermsofacollectionofevidenceovertimeinsteadofan eventasinglemomentintimetestattheendofinstruction.(1988,p.19) DifferentiatingInstruction:Teacherscandifferentiatethecontent,process,orproductsthey useorexpectfromstudents.Assessmentservesacriticalroleinteacherdecisionmaking. Teachersneedtouseawidevarietyofassessmentsystems(regularlycheckourstudent

understanding)toknowwhetherornotourinstructionalinterventions,modifications, accommodations,andextensionsareworking. ClosingtheAchievementGap:TheNorthCentralRegionalEducationalLaboratoryanalysis suggeststhattheachievementgaphasthreedimensions:(1)factorscontributingtothegap, suchaspoverty,race,andteacherquality;(2)multiplecontextsinwhichtheachievementgap exists,suchasinschoolfactors;and(3)time,asstudentprogressthroughtheireducationfrom preKtograde12andbeyond. Breakthrough:Thiscallsforashiftinschoolculturethatusesdatatomakedecisionsinorder topersonalizeinstruction.Acriticalpayapproachrequiresteacherstoknowthecurriculum deeplyandtobeknowledgeableofthewaysinwhichlearnerprogresscanbecheckedalong theway(checkingforunderstanding)usingcriticalpathanalysis. Conclusion: Oftenourchecksforunderstandingareimplementedtoolate,attheendofaunit.Howoften doesonlythenumberofcorrectresponsesdefinethosechecks?Checkingforunderstanding shoulddothefollowing: Alignwithenduringunderstandings(UnderstandingbyDesign) Allowfordifferentiation(Differentiation) Focusongapanalysis(ClosingtheAchievementGap) Leadtopreciseteaching(Breakthrough)

ChapterTwo UsingOralLanguagetoCheckforunderstanding
MisusesofOralLanguageintheClassroom Regardlessofthesizeoftheschool,itsdemographics,theageoftheteachingstaff,orany otherfactorthatwecanthinkof,orallanguagewillbeusedintheclassroom.Peoplewilltalk andlistenthatsagiven. Poverty,Language,andPerceivedSkillLevel: Inclassroomswithincreasednumbersofpovertystudents;teacherstalkmoreandstudents talkless.Englishlanguagelearnersareaskedeasierquestionsornoquestions.Classeswith highachievingstudentstalked55percentoftheclasstimeincomparisontolowachieving classes,teachersmonopolizedclasstimetalking80percentofthetime. GenderDifferences: Girlsspendlesstimetalkinginclassastheygetolder.Someevidenceshowsteacherscallon boysmoreoftenthangirlsandtheyuselongerwaittimewithboys. TheInitiateRespondEvaluateModel:

Thismodelofquestioningdominatesclassroomdiscourse.Thisinteractionfocusesonguess whatsintheteachersheadorwhattheteacheralreadyknows,notoncriticalthinkingbythe wholegroup. OralLanguageStrategiesinCheckingforUnderstanding: AccountableTalk: Thisisaframeworkforteachingstudentsaboutdiscourseinordertoenrightheseinteractions. Thisisdescribedasagreementsstudentsandtheirteachercommittoastheyengageinpartner conversations. Stayontopic Useinformationthatisaccurateandappropriateforthetopic Thinkdeeplyaboutwhatthepartnerhastosay Studentaretaughthowtobeaccountabletooneanotherandtotheirlearningbyusingfive indicatorsofaccountabletalk; 1. Pressforclarificationandexplanation 2. Requirejustificationofproposalsandchallenges 3. Recognizeandchallengemisconceptions: 4. Demandevidenceforclaimsandarguments: 5. Interpretanduseeachothersstatements NoticingNonverbalCues: Studentsoftenhavesimplelooksontheirfaces,throwinghandsintheair,etc. ValueLineups: Studentsareaskedtoevaluateastatementandinstructedtolineupaccordingtotheirdegree ofagreementordisagreementwiththestatement.Afterformingasingleline,thequeueis thenfoldedinhalfsothatthestudentswhomoststronglyagreedanddisagreedwithone anotherarenowfacetoface.Studentsthendiscusstheirreasonsfortheirpostionsandlisten toperspectivesofothers. Retellings: Invitingstudentstoretellwhattheyjustheardorread.Studentsneedtobetaughtthe proceduresofreteling. ThinkPairShare: Thisisacooperativediscussionstrategythatallowsstudentstodiscusstheirreponseswitha peerbeforesharingwiththewholeclass. 1. Think:Teacherengagesstudentstothinkaboutaquestion,prompt,reading,visual,or observation. 2. Pair:Studentspairupanddiscusstheirresponses 3. Share:Teacheraskspairstosharetheirthinking.

MisconceptionAnalysis: Throughgroupdiscussionsandteacherleadingdiscussionquestionsthatleadtoworking throughmisconceptions. WhipAround: Theteacherposesaquestionoratask;typically,studentsareaskedtomakealistofatleast threeitems.Studentsthenindividuallyrespondonascrappieceofpaper.Studentsstandand areaskedtogiveoneoftheirresponses.Studentslistentoothersancheckofftheoneson theirliststhatothersgive.Studentssitdownwhenallthreeoftheiritemshavebeenused.

ChapterThree UsingQuestionstoCheckforUnderstanding
EffectiveQuestioningTechniques: Constructingeffectivequestions: Thisisnotatwostepprocess(questionandanswer) 1. Formulatethequestion(recognitionquestionfirsttobounceotherquestionsfrom) 2. Formatthequestion(Choral,partner,individual,etc.) 3. Givewaittime 4. Scaffoldquestionifstudenthasproblem. 5. Givefeedbacktorespondingstudentorgroup(praise,affirmationofcorrectresponse, orelaborationonanswergiven) ProvidingNonverbalSupport: Eyecontact;lookdirectlyatthespeakerandmaintaineyecontact. Facialexpressions;Useavarietyofappropriatefacialexpressions.Uschassmilingor demonstratingsurpriseorexcitement. Bodyposture;Usegesturessuchashandsignals;maintainbodyposturethatsignifies opennesstostudentsideas. Physicaldistance;adjustyourpositionintheclassroomaccordingtoyourconditionof instruction;forexample,moveclosertoastudentwhoisspeaking(ortoastudentwho islessengaged) Silence;Bequietwhileastudentisspeaking;dontinterrupt;honorwaittimesaftera studentstopsspeaking Verbalacknowledgments;Usebrief,appropriateverbalacknowledgmentssuchasGo ahead,Yes,orIunderstand. Subsummaries;Restateorparaphrasethemainideaspresentedbystudentduring lengthydiscussions. DevelopingAuthenticQuestions: PrepareinadvancequestionfromavarietyofBloomslevels.

InstructionalPracticesThatPromoteParticipation: ResponseCards: Indexcards,signs,dryeraseboards,magneticboards,orotheritemsthataresimultaneously heldupbyallstudentsinclasstoindicatetheirresponsetoaquestionorproblempresentedby theteacher. HandSignals: Studentsusehandsignalstoindicatetheirunderstandingofcontentinformation.Similarto responsecardsbutuseasignaltoindicatetheiranswerinsteadofacardorboard. AudienceResponseSystems: Technologybasedresponsesystemsallowstudentstocomparetheirthinkingwithothersina safeenvironmentmorequickly. ReQuest: Alsocalledreciprocalquestioningwasdesignedtoteachstudentstoaskandanswerquestions astheyread.Firstteacherhasstudentsreadasectionoftext.Thenstudentsaskteacher questionsaboutthetextjustread.Thentheyreadmoreandteacheraskesquestionsto students.Thisisalternatedthroughoutthereadingprocessofcontent. SocraticSeminar: 1. Refertothetextwhenneededduringthediscussion.Notatestofmemory. 2. Itsokaytopasswhenaskedtocontribute. 3. Donotparticipateifyouarenotprepared. 4. Donotstayconfused:askforclarification 5. Sticktothepointcurrentlyunderdiscussion;makenotesabouttheideasyouwantot comebackto 6. Dontraisehands;taketurnsspeaking. 7. Listencarefully 8. Speakupsothatallcanhearyou 9. Talktoeachother,notjusttotheleaderorteacher 10. Discussideasratherthaneachothersopinions. 11. Youareresponsiblefortheseminar,evenifyoudontknowitoradmitit.

ChapterFour UsingWritingtoCheckforUnderstanding
Writingclarifiesthinking.Teacherscandeterminewhattheirstudentsknowbyanalyzing studentswriting.Tocheckforunderstandingonemustlookathowtheformandthecontent interact.Themessageitselfaswellashowwellthemessagewasconveyedareinterrelated.

MisusesofWritingintheClassroom: Shouldneverbeusedapunishmentforproblembehavior.Writinghasalsobeenusedtolabel andsortstudents. WritingstrategiestoCheckforUnderstanding: InteractiveWriting: Firstthewritersdiscussatopicandagreeonamessage.Thistakesideasandmovestospoken words.Theneachwriterinthegroupisaskedtowriteapieceofthemessage.Aftereach personfinishestheentiregroupreadsitaloudasyougo.Whileonepersoniswritingthe teacherorleaderdoesmini(skilledbased)lessonsusingthewrittenresponsesofar. ReadWritePairShare: Readasectionofmaterials,thenwritearesponsetothesection,discussesitwithapartnerand finallysharetheirideaswiththewholegroup.BuildsonThinkPairShare. SummaryWriting: Theseareoftenusedashortinformationpieceswrittenasstudentsexitorenterclassbasedon thelearningthatjustoccurred. RAFT: Role:Whatistheroleofthewriter? Audience:Towhomisthewriterwriting? Format:Whatistheformatforthewriting? Topic:Whatisthefocusofthewriting?

ChapterFive UsingProjectsandPerformancestoCheckforUnderstanding
Theopportunitytoapplylearningtoanovelsituationhastensthetransferoflearning.Blooms workontaxonomyofknowledgewastodefinewaysinwhichatransferoflearningcouldoccur. Tasksassociatedwithapplication,analysis,synthesis,andevaluationarefrequentlydesignedas projectsorperformances. MisusesofProjectsandPerformancesintheClassroom: Thesetasksshouldbeseenasmorethanjustafunorrewardingpayoffforhavinglearnedall thatstuff.Homeschoolcommunicationsometimeslacksandmanyaprojectiscompletedbya parentorothersiblingandlittlelearninghasoccurredforthestudentasaresult.

DesignPrinciplesforProjectsandPerformances LearningAppropriateGoals: Anessentialquestionshouldcultivatetheprojectswork.Whatdoyouwantstudentslearn fromdoingtheproject? ScaffoldsforStudentandTeacherLearning: Provideasmallerproblemlearningassignmentbeforeassigningamajorproject.Thisgives boththestudentandtheteachersomelearningfromandexperienceinordertomakethe largerprojectmoresuccessful. FrequentOpportunitiesforFormativeAssessmentandRevision: Buildinincrementalassessmentstopreventdifficultiesinpoorendresultsforhardstudent work.Buildstagesoftheprojectandconferwithstudentsafter/duringeachstage.Checklists aregreatforstudentstostayontrack. SocialOrganizationsThatPromoteParticipationandaSenseofAgency: Tomakegroupworkmoresuccessfulthereneedstobebothindividualandgroup accountability.Peerfeedbackcanbehelpfulforstudentswhenrunningitpastatrustedfriend. EffectiveTechniquesUsingProjectsandPerformances ReadersTheatre: Studentsreaddirectlyfromscriptstotellastoryorinformanaudience.Helpingstudentsbuild theircharacterdeepensthelearningthatoccurs. MultimediaPresentations: Learnerscansharewhattheyknowastheycombinetext,graphics,video,sound,andeven animation. ElectronicandPaperPortfolios: Acollectionofitemsintendedtoreflectabodyofwork.Theyarenotascrapbookofrandom ephemeragatheredduringtheschoolyear.Attheirbest,theycanprovideanotherwayto checkforunderstanding.StudentsmustchoosetheevidencethatBESTillustratestheir learning. VisualDisplaysofInformation: ClassroomInstructionThatWorks,Marzano,PickeringandPollockfourvisualdisplays (nonlinguisticrepresentations)themostunderusedinstructionalstrategyofallthosereviewed. Butevidenceshowsthatusingthesemethodshelpswithagreaterdegreeofcertainty. Graphicorganizers: TheseareeffectivewithallstudentsbutespeciallywithEnglishLearners,Backgrounddeficient students,andstudentswithmedicalconditions.

Inspiration: Digitalprogramhelpingstudentsbuildgraphicorganizerswiththeknowledgethattheyrecord butalsowillmovetoalinguisticoutlineformatwithsamecontent. Foldables: ThreedimensionalinteractivegraphicorganizersdevelopedbyZike(1992).Studentscan manipulateconceptsandinformationinwaysthatarefarmorekinestheticthanordinary worksheets. Dioramas: Miniaturemodelsofascenefromthephysical,social,bilolgical,ornarrativeworld,traditionally builtinsideashoeboxturnedonitsside.Foldablesforpreferredbecauseoftheirversatility. Performances: Againperformancesgivestudentsopportunitiestodemonstrateknowledgeatahigherlevel.

ChapterSix UsingTeststoCheckforUnderstanding
Inthiseraofaccountability,studentunderstandingisultimatelymeasuredbytests.Empathy forourstudentshouldbebalancedwithhardquestionsaboutourroleintheirapprehension andpossiblylackofpreparedness.Wecannotchangetestingbutwecancreateenvironments wheretestinginunderstoodbyteachersandstudents.Howtousethemandwhytouse certaintypesfordifferentpurposes. WhyUseTests? Testsandassessmentsarecommonlyusefordiagnosingindividualstudentneeds,informing instruction,evaluatingprograms,Providingaccountabilityinformation. MisusesofTestsintheClassroom: TheuseoftheIQtesthashelpedmoveusintoaneraofevaluationbutheldusbackfromtruly helpingstudents.Mosteducatorsmisusetestingtodooneormoreofthefollowing: Narrowthecurriculumbyexcludingsubjectmatternottested. Reducinglearningtothememorizationofeasilyrecalledfactsformultiplechoice testing. Devotingtoomuchtimetotestpreparationratherthanlearning. Mosthigherachievingschoolsinfusethecurriculumwithtestingandtestpreparationrather thanmakeitauniqueparttobeplacedin. UsingTeststoCheckforUnderstanding: Allsystemsforcheckingforunderstanding,includingtests,requireananalysisofstudent responsesinorderfortheteacherandstudenttomakeinstructionaldecisions.

MultipleChoice: Thesetestscanbeeasilyadministeredaswellasfinddetailedinformationaboutwhystudents aremakingerrors.Page106to108inbookgoesontoexplaintheprosandconsofmultiple choicetestquestionsaswellaswhatmakeamultipletestquestionandhowtoevaluateit. ShortAnswer: Thesearegenerallyconsideredeffectiveasameasureofstudentsabilitytoaccuratelyrecall specificinformation.Page109111outlinesdifferenttypesofclozetestsaswellasthepros andcons. DichotomousChoices(TrueandFalse): Studentsareaskedtoidentifyifadeclarativestatementistrueorfalse.Page112113explain theprosandconsaswellasusesofthesetypesofquestions. Essays(ExtendedResponse): Theserequirethestudenttoconsolidatetheirunderstandingofatopic,organizetheirthinking, andresentitintheformofwriting.Page114118explainprosandconsaswellasusesofthis typeoftest. Conclusion: AsTomllinson(1999)soaptlystates,Assessmentalwayshasmoretodowithhelpingstudents growthanwithcatalogingtheirmistakesTestsshouldbeusedtocheckforunderstandingand todeterminewhattodonext.

ChapterSeven UsingCommonAssessmentsandConsensusScoringtoCheckforUnderstanding
UsingDatatoImproveStudentAchievement: Lotsofwaystoimprovestudentachievement;hiringveteranteachers,purchasingnew curricula,providingafterschooltutoring,andsoon;Butitisreallywhattheteacherdoesthat isgoingtomakethedifference. AProtocolforUsingCommonAssessments: StepOne:PacingGuides Mustmeetanddecidewhatthetimelineisforthesequenceofcontentinstruction. StepTwo:InstructionalMaterialsandArrangements Teachersmustthenselectmaterials,strategies,approaches,andarrangementsthatenhanced thepacingofthecontent. StepThree:CommonAssessments Atpredeterminedpointsintheyearstudentsparticipateinacommonassessmentoftheir learning.

StepFour:ConsensusScoringandItemAnalysis Theresultsarepresentedbygradeorcoursenotteacher.Theyaredisaggregatedbysignificant subpopulationsandteachersdiscusssolutionsforthegaps. StepFive:RevisingPacingGuides,ReviewingAssessments,Reteaching,andForming InterventionGroups Becauseofstudentperformanceteachersrevisethepacingandinstructiontoenhancegreat learningnexttime.Thisstartsthecyclealloveragain. Thebookthengoesontogiveseveralexamplesofthecycleinuseanditssuccess.Pages125 132

Afterword CheckingYourOwnUnderstanding
Thissectionisforthereadertoevaluatewhattheylearned.Ihaveattachedthechartthat recapsallthestrategiesthatwerecoveredwithinthebook.

You might also like