Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

Flight Operations Briefing Notes Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

Introduction
Inability to assess or manage the aircraft energy level during the approach often is cited as a causal factor in unstabilized approaches. Either a deficit of energy (being low and/or slow) or an excess of energy (being high and/or fast) may result in approach-and-landing accidents, such as: Loss of control; Landing short; Hard landing; Tail strike; Runway excursion; and/or, Runway overrun.

This Flight Operations Briefing Note provides background information and operational guidelines for a better understanding of: Energy management during intermediate approach: How fast can you fly down to the FAF or outer marker?

Energy management during final approach: Hazards associated with flying on the backside of the power curve (as defined by Figure 2). Refer also to the Flight Operations Briefing Note Factors Affecting the Final Approach Speed (VAPP).

Page 1 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

II

Statistical Data
Approximately 70 % of rushed and unstable approaches involve an incorrect management of the aircraft energy level, resulting in an excess or deficit of energy, as follows: Being slow and/or low on approach : 40 % of events; Being fast and/or high on approach: 30 % of events.

III

Aircraft Energy Level

The level of energy of an aircraft is a function of the following primary flight parameters and of their rate of change (trend): Airspeed and speed trend; Altitude and vertical speed (or flight path angle); Aircraft configuration (i.e., drag caused by speed brakes, slats/flaps and/or landing gear); and, Thrust level.

One of the tasks of the pilot is to control and monitor the energy level of the aircraft (using all available cues) in order to: Maintain the aircraft at the appropriate energy level throughout the flight phase: Keep flight path, speed, thrust and configuration; or,

Recover the aircraft from a low energy or high energy situation, i.e., from: Being too slow and/or too low; or, Being too fast and/or too high.

Controlling the aircraft energy level consists in continuously controlling each parameter: airspeed, thrust, configuration and flight path, and in transiently trading one parameter for another. Autopilot and flight director modes, aircraft instruments, warnings and protections are designed to assist the flight crew in these tasks.

IV

Going Down and Slowing Down : How Fast Can you Fly Down to the Marker?
A study by the U.S. NTSB acknowledges that maintaining a high airspeed down to the outer marker (OM) does not favor the capture of the glideslope beam by the autopilot or the aircraft stabilization at the defined stabilization height. The study concludes that no speed restriction should be imposed when within 3 nm to 4 nm before the OM, mainly in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC).

Page 2 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

Nevertheless, ATC requests for maintaining a high airspeed down to the marker (160 kt to 200 kt IAS typically) are frequent at high-density airports, to increase the aircraft landing rate. The purpose of the following part is to: Recall the definition of stabilization heights; Illustrate the aircraft deceleration characteristics in level flight and on a 3-degree glide path; Provide guidelines for assessment of the maximum speed which, reasonably, can be maintained down to the marker, as a function of: The distance from the OM to the runway threshold; and, The desired stabilization height.

IV.1 Stabilization Height

The definition and criteria for a stabilized approach are provided in the Flight Operations Briefing Note Flying Stabilized Approaches. The minimum stabilization height must be: 1000 ft above airfield elevation in IMC; 500 ft above airfield elevation in VMC.

IV.2 Aircraft Deceleration Characteristics

Although deceleration characteristics largely depends on the aircraft type and grossweight, the following typical values can be considered for a quick assessment and management of the aircraft deceleration capability: Deceleration in level flight: With approach flaps extended: 10 to 15 kt-per-nm; With landing gear down and flaps full: 20 to 30 kt-per-nm;

Deceleration on a 3 degree glide path: With landing flaps and gear down: 10 to 20 kt per nm.

Note: A 3 degree glide path is typically equivalent to a descent-gradient of 300 ft-per-nm or a 700 ft/mn vertical speed, for a final approach ground speed of 140 kt. Decelerating on a 3 degree glide path in clean configuration usually is not possible.

Page 3 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

When established on a typical 3 degree glide slope path with only slats extended (i.e., with no flaps), it takes approximately 3 nm (1000 ft) to decelerate down to the target final approach speed and to establish the landing configuration. Speedbrakes may be used to achieve a faster deceleration, as allowed by the aircraft type (i.e. speedbrakes inhibition). Usually the use of speedbrakes is not recommended when below 1000 ft above airfield elevation and/or in the landing flaps configuration. Typically, slats should be extended not later than 3 nm before the FAF. Figure 1 illustrates the aircraft deceleration capability and the maximum possible speed at the OM, based on a conservative deceleration rate of 10 kt per nm on a 3 degree glide path. The following conditions are considered: IMC (stabilization height 1000 ft above airfield elevation); and, Final approach speed (VAPP) = 130 kt.

The maximum deceleration achievable between the OM (typically 6.0 nm from the runway threshold) and the stabilization point (1000 ft above airfield elevation / 3.0 nm) is: 10 kt-per-nm x (6.0 3. 0) nm = 30 kt. In order to be stabilized at 130 kt at 1000 above airfield elevation, the maximum speed that can be accepted and maintained down to the OM is: 130 kt + 30 kt = 160 kt.
Deceleration Segment ( 10 kt/nm )
OM

MM

2000 ft

1000 ft 500 ft nm 6.0 V MAX at OM = 160 kt

3.0 V APP = 130 kt

Figure 1 Deceleration along Glide Slope - Typical Note: The OM may be located from 4 to 6 NM from the runway threshold. Whenever being required to maintain a high speed down to the marker, the above quick computation may be considered for assessing the feasibility of the ATC request.

Page 4 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

Avoiding the Back Side of the Power Curve

During an unstable approach, the airspeed or the thrust setting often is observed to deviate from the target values: Airspeed is below the target final approach speed (VAPP); and/or, Thrust is reduced and maintained at idle.

V.1 Thrust-required-to-fly Curve

Figure 2 illustrates the thrust-required-to-fly curve (i.e. the power curve).

Thrust Required to Fly 3-degree glide slope - Landing configuration

Given gross-weight Given pressure altitude Given flight path

Required thrust

Stable Unstable

Thrust for V APP

90

100

110

120

130 140 150 Vminimum thrust

160

170

180

190

200

Airspeed ( kt )

Figure 2 Power Curve Typical The power curve is divided in two parts: The left side of the power curve, called the backside of the power curve; The right side of the power curve.

Page 5 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

The difference between (i.e., the thrust balance):

the

available-thrust

and

the

thrust-required-to-fly

Represents the climb or acceleration capability (if the available-thrust exceeds the required-thrust); or, Indicates that speed and/or flight path cannot be maintained (if the required-thrust exceeds the available-thrust).

The right part of the power curve is the normal area of operation. The thrust balance is such that, when the thrust is set to fly VAPP on the glideslope, any increase of the aircraft speed due to a perturbation is rapidly washed out, because a higher thrust would be required to fly at this higher speed on the glideslope. Conversely, when the thrust is set to fly VAPP on the glideslope, any speed loss due to a perturbation is rapidly washed out, because a lower thrust would be required to fly at this lower speed on the glideslope. In other words, in case of perturbation, the aircraft speed tends to come back to the speed stabilized with that thrust level. The right part of the curve is called the stable part. On the backside of the power curve, the thrust balance is such that, at given thrust level, any tendency to decelerate increases the thrust-required-to-fly and, hence, amplifies the tendency to decelerate. Conversely, any tendency to accelerate decreases the thrust-required-to-fly and, hence, amplifies the tendency to accelerate. The minimum thrust speed (V minimum thrust) usually is equal to 1.35 to 1.4 V stall, in landing configuration. The minimum final approach speed (i.e. VLS) is slightly in the backside of the power curve. Note: On Airbus aircraft, this part of the curve is rather flat. If the airspeed drops below the final approach speed, more thrust is required to maintain the desired flight path and/or to regain the target speed. If the thrust is set at idle, approximately 5 seconds are necessary to obtain the engine thrust required to recover from a speed loss or to initiate a go-around (as illustrated in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Page 6 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

V.2 Engine Acceleration Characteristics

When flying the final approach segment with the thrust set and maintained at idle (approach idle), the pilot should be aware of the acceleration characteristics of jet engines, as illustrated below.

Thrust Response from Idle to GA Thrust ( typical engine-to-engine scatter )

100

80

Thrust ( in % GA thrust )

60

40

20

Approach idle

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time ( seconds )
Figure 3 Engine Response Scatter- Typical The acceleration capability of high by pass ratio jet engine is dictated by its physical characteristics and controlled to: Protect the engine against a stall or flameout; Comply with the engine and aircraft certification requirements (U.S. FAR Part 33 and FAR Part 25, respectively, or the applicable equivalent regulation).

The engine certification (FAR Part 33) ensures a time of 5 seconds or less to accelerate from 15 % to 95 % of the go-around thrust. The aircraft certification (FAR Part 25) ensures that the thrust achieved after 8 seconds from power application (starting from flight/approach idle) allows a minimum climb gradient of 3.2 % for go-around.

Page 7 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

Thrust Response - Approach Idle to GA ( aircraft certification requirements )

100

Thrust ( in % of GA thrust )

80

60

40

8 seconds (FAR 25)

20

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time ( seconds )
Figure 4 Certified Thrust Response Typical

V.3 Go-around from Low Speed / Low Thrust

Table 1 indicates the thrust required (in % of the TOGA thrust) in order to achieve the following maneuvers:

Maneuvers
Flying a stabilized approach (3-degree glide path / VAPP) Arresting altitude loss and achieving level flight Achieving Positive Climb

% of TOGA Thrust
20 % 30 % > 30 %

Table 1 Thrust Required during GA Initiation

Page 8 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

Figure 5 illustrates the go-around trajectories associated with flying an approach with: Speed on the target final approach speed (VAPP) with idle thrust; Speed below VAPP (VAPP 10 kt) with idle thrust.

In case of go-around, the initial altitude loss and the time required for recovering the initial altitude are increased if airspeed is lower than the final approach speed and/or if thrust is set at idle. In particular, the effect of lack of thrust (i.e. thrust at idle) is significant in terms of altitude loss.

Altitude Loss in Go-around ( Landing Configuration )

30 20

Altitude Loss ( in feet from go-around initiation )

V APP / Stabilized thrust 10 0 -10 V APP / Idle -20 V APP - 10 kt / Idle -30 -40 -50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Time ( seconds )
Figure 5 Effect of Initial Speed and Thrust on Altitude Loss during Go-around (Typical)

Page 9 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

VI

Summary of Key Points

A deceleration below the final approach speed should be accepted only in the following cases: GPWS terrain avoidance maneuver; Collision avoidance maneuver; and, Windshear procedure.

Nevertheless, in all three cases, the throttles/thrust levers must be advanced to the maximum thrust (i.e., TOGA thrust) while initiating the maneuver.

VII

Associated Flight Operations Briefing Notes

The following Flight Operations Briefing Notes should be reviewed along with the above information for a complete overview of the approach management: Being Prepared for Go-around Flying Stabilized Approaches Flying Constant-angle Non-precision Approaches Factors affecting the Final Approach Speed (VAPP)

VIII

Regulatory References
ICAO Annex 6 Operation of Aircraft, Part I International Commercial Air Transport Aeroplanes, Appendix 2, 5.18, 5.19. ICAO Procedures for Air navigation Services Aircraft Operations (PANS-OPS, Doc 8168), Volume I Flight Procedures.

IX

Other References
U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Report NTSB-AAS-76-5 Special Study: Flight Crew Coordination Procedure in Air Carrier Instrument Landing System Approach Accidents.

Page 10 of 11

Flight Operations Briefing Notes

Approach Techniques Aircraft Energy Management during Approach

This Flight Operations Briefing Note (FOBN) has been adapted from the corresponding ALAR Briefing Note developed by Airbus in the frame of the Approach-and-Landing Accident Reduction (ALAR) international task force led by the Flight Safety Foundation. This FOBN is part of a set of Flight Operations Briefing Notes that provide an overview of the applicable standards, flying techniques and best practices, operational and human factors, suggested company prevention strategies and personal lines-of-defense related to major threats and hazards to flight operations safety. This FOBN is intended to enhance the reader's flight safety awareness but it shall not supersede the applicable regulations and the Airbus or airline's operational documentation; should any deviation appear between this FOBN and the Airbus or airlines AFM / (M)MEL / FCOM / QRH / FCTM, the latter shall prevail at all times. In the interest of aviation safety, this FOBN may be reproduced in whole or in part - in all media - or translated; any use of this FOBN shall not modify its contents or alter an excerpt from its original context. Any commercial use is strictly excluded. All uses shall credit Airbus and the Flight Safety Foundation. Airbus shall have no liability or responsibility for the use of this FOBN, the correctness of the duplication, adaptation or translation and for the updating and revision of any duplicated version. Airbus Customer Services Flight Operations Support and Services 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte - 31707 BLAGNAC CEDEX France FOBN Reference : FLT_OPS APPR SEQ03 REV02 OCT. 2005

Page 11 of 11