Writing Grant Needs
Writing Grant Needs
The Needs Assessment is one of the most critical parts of a grant proposal; it specifies the educational needs that the grant project addresses and indicates how the needs were identified. Relevant data, such as standardized test scores or survey results, is used to substantiate the educational needs of the targeted population, which should include students, teachers, and parents. Step One: Gather the Data Before any writing can begin, you will need to gather all of the relevant data for the targeted population. Examples of the types of data to gather might include, but not be limited to: Demographic Data Student Performance Levels Parental Involvement Needs Professional Development Needs Socioeconomic Data Instructional Needs Technology Needs
Step Two: Review the Data Have several people, such as classroom teachers, curriculum specialists, technology leaders, and special education teachers, review the data. Look at the student performance data as a whole set, but then disaggregate the data into subsets by demographic focus groups. Step Three: Determine Needs based upon the Data Based upon the disaggregated data, determine the specific needs for students, teachers, and parents. The educational goals, objectives, activities, and performance targets will be based upon these specific needs. Step Four: Write the Needs Assessment Using the data gathered in Step One and the needs established in Step Three, develop a clear and detailed statement that specifies needs for academic achievement, technology, professional development, and parental involvement.
Although district-wide, Sample SD students perform at the Acceptable level on the <year> <State Assessment>, disaggregated data reveals a wide disparity among limited and non-limited English proficient students and between elementary campuses. On the Spring <year> <State Assessment> the average Learning Index (LI) in reading for Grade 3 was 86 for non-limited English proficient students, but only 64 for Limited English Proficient (LEP) students. Overall, 94% of general education students met the minimum expectations for <State Assessment> Reading, but only 67% of Economically Disadvantaged and 53% of Special Education students met the minimum expectations. Additionally, SSD identification percentages of Special Education students have increased to over 11% compared to the state average of approximately 8%. Improvement in the overall instructional design of classes, as well as literacy development opportunities for struggling and at-risk students is critical to combat these growing problems of inequity among Sample students. As a result of these demographic and instructional needs, the district has joined with several community partners to create <Name of Project>. This project will aggressively address learning gaps between diverse primary and elementary student groups. All fourteen SSD elementary campuses have committed to participate in the planning and implementation of Project <Name>; an effective, research-based initiative to improve the literacy skills of students in Grades K-5, including sustained professional development that focuses on effective instructional strategies and methodologies.
Many of these students are deficient in the literacy skills necessary to become successful readers. In fact, the <Year> <State Assessment> Reading scores for all students at SMS dropped 17%, while scores for At-Risk learners plummeted 26%. Economically Disadvantaged students scored 33% lower on <State Assessment> than the previous year. Special Education students scored more than 50% lower than general education students; only 27% met the minimum expectations in Reading. Overall, the general education population scored in the 78 percentile on <State Assessment> Reading, but the Special Education population continues to score significantly below their peers. On the <State Assessment> Social Studies test, 67% of all students mete minimum expectations, on the <State Assessment> Science test, 85% of all students met minimum expectations. For special learners, <State Assessment> Social Studies scores indicated that 54% met minimum expectations; on the <State Assessment> Science test, 62% of special learners met minimum expectations.
Scholastic Inc.
Page 2 of 4
Identification, intervention, and parental involvement are critical needs for the diverse learners at Sample MS. Implementation of a systematic process for teaching reading and consistent classroom methodologies for meeting and assessing student needs will ensure that every student will make significant gains with increased skills to become proficient readers. To meet this goal, the Site-Based committee has decided to aggressively address the learning gaps through diverse interventions. Incorporating additional reading programs within a balanced reading program will equip middle school teachers with a powerful, research-based, proven intervention program. Professional development will focus on reading research, assessment, effective diagnostic practices, intervention, and the writing process. In addition, a strong school-tohome link will ensure parents as partners in this collaborative reading intervention program. The <Name of Project> will address the following critical areas of need:
Based on data from an informal needs assessment survey, as well as, discussions with teachers, administrators, district content specialists, and parents, the program must also:
1. 2. 3. 4.
Provide direct, systematic instruction Have a strong school-to-parent connection Have a dynamic, robust teacher support system Be user friendly and technology-based in order to provide motivation and individualization of instruction 5. Provide high-quality literature As the demographic and state assessment data show, geographic, economic, and educational barriers establish a need for a comprehensive reading intervention program in which teachers, parents, and community members can collaborate. A lack of local libraries and media centers within the Sample MS community severely limits opportunities for students and families to develop life-long reading habits and literacy skills. In addition, the high number of identified students demonstrating a lack of fundamental reading skills necessary for academic and personal success mandate that SMS active seek interventions to provide additional direct instruction, as well as, innovative teaching practices to meet individual student needs.
Scholastic Inc.
Page 3 of 4
Scholastic Inc.
Page 4 of 4