Michael Diebold,

Robert Kwoka, and

David Mukoda,
DuPont Titanium
Technologies, USA
Presented at the 2012 American Coatings Conference,
sponsored by ACA and Vincentz Network, on May 810, in
Indianapolis, IN.
With titanium dioxide (TiO
2
) in short supply,
many coatings manufacturers are re-evaluating
their paint formulas to optimize TiO
2
effectiveness
and/or incorporate not-in-kind alternative options
for opacity. Applying optical theory to practical paint
making leads us to the following conclusions, which
will be explored more thoroughly in this article:
1. Incorporating air voids into a coating, either
by formulating above critical pigment volume
concentration or by using hollow sphere
opaque polymers, can provide good dry film
optical performance at reduced TiO
2
loadings,
but the use of air voids is constrained by other
coating performance parameters.
2. Replacing large extender particles with small
extender particles can improve TiO
2
light
scattering efficiency, allowing some reduction
in TiO
2
loadings, but this is not likely a result of
the smaller extenders preferentially spacing
the TiO
2
particles.
3. Targeted spacing technologies, like the use of
highly coated TiO
2
products, can improve TiO
2

efficiency, allowing a reduction in TiO
2
pigment
loading in appropriate coating formulations.
BACKGROUND
The primary property that TiO
2
contributes to
a coating is hiding power. Hiding power describes
the ability of a coating to obscure a background
of contrasting color. Hiding occurs when the
penetration of incident light through a film is
reduced, either by light scattering or by light
absorption. TiO
2
contributes to hiding power by light
scattering. Colored materials, whether they are
colored impurities in the coating or intentionally
added colored pigments, contribute to hiding power
by light absorption.
The ability of TiO
2
to scatter light in a coating
depends on particle size; the difference in refractive
index of the TiO
2
particle and its surroundings; and
the proximity of the TiO
2
particles to one another.
For the purposes of this article, we will assume
that commercial TiO
2
grades produced for coatings
are more or less optimally sized and this attribute
will not be discussed further.
The light scattering potential of a TiO
2
particle
is proportional to the square of the difference
between the refractive index of the TiO
2
and the
average refractive index of the medium in which
the TiO
2
particle resides.
1
While the refractive
index of the TiO
2
particle remains constant (rutile
TiO
2
R.I. = 2.73), the average refractive index
of its surroundings changes depending on the
TiO
2
Scattering
Optimization
and Not-In-Kind
Opacity Alternatives
February 2013
30
COATINGSTECH
composition of the coating. Typical paint resins
and filler particles (e.g., clay and calcium
carbonate) have similar refractive indices (R.I.
= 1.51.6). Fillers provide little light scattering
and hiding power, and changing their relative
composition does not significantly impact the
average refractive index of the coating. However,
changing the volume concentration of TiO
2
in
a coating affects the average refractive index
of the coating, influencing the difference in
refractive index between the TiO
2
particle and
its surroundings, and thereby impacting the light
scattering efficiency of the TiO
2
.
This effect is illustrated in Figure 1, which
represents the simple case of TiO
2
dispersed in
resin. The x-axis shows the result of increasing
the TiO
2
volume concentration on the average
refractive index of the coating. For example, increasing
the TiO
2
volume concentration from 10% to 30%
increases the average refractive index of the coating
from 1.71 to 1.93. The solid blue line in the figure shows
the diminishment of TiO
2
light scattering efficiency as the
TiO
2
content and average refractive index of the coating
increase as predicted by Mie Theory.
2
This is often
referred to as the TiO
2
crowding effect.
The light scattering or hiding power contribution of
TiO
2
in a coating is the product of the TiO
2
scattering
efficiency at a specific average coating refractive index
(or

TiO
2
volume concentration in this simple example)
times the TiO
2
volume concentration. This total light
scattering contribution is represented by the dashed red
line in Figure 1. At low TiO
2
concentrations, say less than
15% TiO
2
by volume, the coating light scattering/hiding
power increases almost linearly with TiO
2
concentration.
As TiO
2
concentrations increase further, the incremental
increase in coating light scattering/hiding power per
increment of TiO
2
volume concentration diminishes.
Eventually the point is reached where additional
increases in TiO
2
content actually reduce the total
coating light scattering/hiding power. Obviously, this is a
very inefficient space to formulate coatings.
FORMULATING ABOVE CRITICAL PIGMENT
VOLUME CONCENTRATION
The critical pigment volume concentration (CPVC) is
the formulation point at which there is just enough resin
available to fill in the spaces between pigment particles,
whether the pigment particles are TiO
2
, clays, calcium
carbonates, or other extenders. When the pigment
volume concentration is increased beyond the CPVC,
there is insufficient free resin to fill in the space between
the pigment particles, and air voids are created within
the coating matrix. Increasing the coating PVC further
increases the volume of air voids incorporated.
Air has a refractive index of 1.0, so incorporating air
into a coating film has a significant impact on coating
light scattering and hiding power. The first
effect is that the presence of air in the
dried coating film reduces the average
refractive index of the coating. This
heightens the difference in the refractive
index between the TiO
2
particles and their
surroundings, increasing the light scattering
efficiency of the TiO
2
. Because it is more
efficient, the TiO
2
content can be reduced
while maintaining equal hiding power of the
dried film.
An example of this effect is represented
in Figure 2. Incorporating 10% air void
volume into a coating with 20 vol% TiO
2

reduces the average refractive index of the
coating from 1.82 to 1.76. As a result, the
light scattering efficiency increases by 18%,
meaning that the TiO
2
concentration can be
reduced by 18% while maintaining equal
coating light scattering and hiding power.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.7 1.75 1.8 1.85 1.9
Coating Average Refractive Index
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

L
i
g
h
t

S
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g

(
p
e
r

u
n
i
t

v
o
l
u
m
e
)

TiO
2
Air Voids HSOP
Typical Architectural Coating Formulation Range
Incorporating 10 vol% air
reduces coating R.I. .
increasing TiO
2
light
scattering efficiency 18%
Figure 2Coating opacifier light scattering efficiency.
Figure 1Light scattering vs. TiO
2
concentration in resin.
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25


TiO
2
Vol Conc . X TiO
2
Scattering =Coating Scattering (Hiding Power)
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

T
i
O
2

S
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

C
o
a
t
i
n
g

S
c
a
t
t
e
r
i
n
g

a
n
d

H
i
d
i
n
g

P
o
w
e
r
TiO
2
Pigment Vol Concentration (PVC)
Coating Light Scattering TiO
2
light scattering
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
1.71 1.82 1.93 2.04 2.15
Average Coating Refractive Index
COATINGSTECH
31
February 2013
If the air voids in the dried coating are the right size,
they provide additional value in terms of light scattering
and hiding power, and additional opportunity for TiO
2

reduction. Because the air voids have a refractive index of
1.0 and are in a coating matrix with an average refractive
index of 1.6 to 1.7, the voids can act as light scattering
particles in their own right.
3
The optimum air void size
for light scattering is about 0.23 microns, about the same
optimum size of TiO
2
particles. The selection of extender
pigments in coatings formulated above CPVC can have
a significant impact on the size of air voids formed in
the dried coating, and therefore on the light scattering
efficiency of these voids. The relative light scattering
efficiency of optimally sized air voids is represented by the
pink dashed line in Figure 2.
The limitations of taking advantage of air voids
by formulating above the CPVC are well known.
4
The
primary drawback is that the air voids cannot exist in
the wet coating and therefore provide no light scattering
when the coating is wet, i.e., a loss of wet hiding.
When the coating dries, the air voids that provide so
much benefit in terms of light scattering diminish the
structural integrity of the coating and increase porosity.
This generally has a negative impact on such important
coating properties as washability, scrub resistance, stain
resistance, and durability.
HOLLOW SPHERE OPAQUE POLYMERS
Air voids can also be incorporated into coatings
formulated below CPVC by using hollow sphere opaque
polymers (HSOPs).
5
HSOPs are nonfilm-forming synthetic
pigments that are supplied as emulsions and are added
to the wet paints. In the wet state, each HSOP particle
consists of a spherical styrene/acrylic bead with a
water-filled void in its center. As the paints dry, the water
diffuses from the center of the beads and is replaced
with air, resulting in encapsulated air voids dispersed
uniformly throughout the dry paint film. The mechanism
is irreversible.
Incorporating hollow sphere pigments into a coating
has the same effect on TiO
2
light scattering efficiency
as creating air voids by formulating above CPVC. The
encapsulated air voids created by the HSOPs increase
TiO
2
light scattering efficiency by reducing the average
refractive index of the paint film, and increasing the
difference in refractive index between the TiO
2
particle
and its surroundings.
The encapsulated air void sizes provided by HSOPs
are nearly optimized for light scattering and therefore are
also light scattering sites in their own right. The relative
light scattering efficiency of HSOPs compared to TiO
2
is
shown by the yellow dotted line in Figure 2. The HSOP
light scattering efficiency is lower than the air void light
scattering efficiency because we need to account for the
volume of the HSOP shell. It is assumed that the shell
comprises 56% of the volume of the HSOP, so the HSOP
light scattering efficiency is 44% that of a pure air void.
The HSOP light scattering efficiency rises with
increasing average coating refractive index (i.e.,
increasing TiO
2
content), because the difference in
refractive index between the entrapped air void and
its surroundings increases. Within the normal range of
average coating refractive index for paints containing both
TiO
2
and HSOP, TiO
2
is three to five times more efficient
in light scattering than HSOPs on an equal volume basis.
HSOPs have the highest light scattering efficiency, and
provide the highest potential for TiO
2
reduction in coatings
where the TiO
2
content (and therefore the average
refractive index of the coating) is high.
An example of the efficacy of HSOPs as a TiO
2

replacement in a high TiO
2
content semigloss paint
is shown in Figure 3. The figure shows the effect on
coating hiding power resulting from one-for-one volume
replacements of rutile TiO
2
with commercially available
HSOP, a large particle size CaCO
3
, and an ultrafine
CaCO
3
. Though clearly more effective in maintaining
hiding power than replacing TiO
2
with CaCO
3
, HSOPs
are not a one-for-one replacement for TiO
2
. Based on
the relative light scattering efficiencies shown in Figure
2, HSOP would need to replace TiO
2
at a 35 to 1
volume ratio to maintain equal dry hiding. In fact, one
supplier of HSOPs recommends replacement at precisely
these ratios. Insights into the differences between the
hiding power efficiency of the two CaCO
3
products are
discussed in the next section.
Again, there are limitations to formulating with
HSOPs. First, since the HSOPs are filled with water when
the coating is wet, they are essentially transparent, and
therefore do not contribute to wet hiding. Wet hiding
power is almost totally dependent on TiO
2
content, so
any replacement of TiO
2
with HSOPs will diminish the
wet hiding power of the coating. HSOPs also have a high
specific volume when dry, and present a substantial
impact on the coating PVC.
Care needs to be taken when formulating with HSOPs
to manage coating PVC relative to CPVC to maintain
scrub resistance. HSOPs can also diminish the burnish
resistance of coatings. Care also needs to be taken to
manage gloss and sheen of the coatings through the
Figure 3TiO
2
replacement efficiency in semigloss paint. i i l ffi i i i l i
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
% Vol Replacement of Rutile TiO
2
R
e
l
a
t
i
v
e

H
i
d
i
n
g

P
o
w
e
r
Hollow Sphere Opaque Polymer Large PS CaCO3 Ultrafine CaCO3
3 3
February 2013
32
COATINGSTECH
use of extenders. In short, the use of HSOPs to reduce
TiO
2
content of a coating needs to be balanced with
managing other important coating properties.
MINERAL FILLERS
We turn our attention to mineral extender particles
(also known as fillers). These materials are ubiquitous
in the coatings industry.
4
Their value proposition is that
they are, on a volume basis, less expensive than resin,
and so offer cost savings as a partial resin replacement.
In addition, some fillers provide functionality to paints,
such as decreasing sheen levels in dry paints or altering
the rheology of wet paints. Mineral extenders are
typically white powders in air, but, as noted previously,
the slight differences in refractive indices between
organic resins and most of these extender particles
result in their providing negligible light scattering in the
dry paint. However, they can influence the white opacity
of paint by altering the scattering efficiency of the TiO
2

pigment. In some cases, the influence is positive; in
other cases, it is negative.
Among the negative influences of extenders on TiO
2

scattering is the crowding effect associated with extender
particles that are large compared to TiO
2
particles.
6
For
most extenders, particles are significantly larger than
TiO
2
pigment particles, and, when present in a paint
film, they restrict the location of pigment particles to the
interstitial regions between the large particles (Figure
4a). This crowds the TiO
2
particles, which decreases the
scattering efficiency of the pigment.
7
By comparison, in
the absence of large particles (Figure 4b), the available
volume for pigment particles is significantly larger, and
the pigment particles crowd one another much less.
The detrimental effect of large particles on opacity can
be quite significant, decreasing the pigment scattering
efficiency in some cases by 10% or more.
The decrease in opacity due to crowding from
large particle extenders can be partially remediated
by replacing the large particles with an equal volume
of small particle size extenders (that is, extender size
ranges on the same order as the quarter micron TiO
2

particles). In the presence of small extender particles,
the space available to the TiO
2
particles is much less
restricted, and, as shown in Figure 5, the pigment
particles can approach a random distribution within the
paint film.
By this mechanism, small extender particles return
the TiO
2
scattering efficiency to nearly that which would
be seen if no resin had been replaced by extender
particles, but not beyond the level seen in the absence of
an extender. The effect of replacing large extenders with
small extenders can be seen by referring back to Figure
3. The hiding power of coating films of identical coating
PVC but with increasing one-for-one volume replacement
of TiO
2
by different sized extender particles and by hollow
sphere opaque polymers are shown. Clearly, replacing
large extenders with smaller extenders improves hiding,
but even small extenders are not as effective as HSOP,
which, in turn, is not as effective as TiO
2
at equal volume
concentrations.
In addition to the boost in TiO
2
efficiency seen
when large extender particles are replaced with small
ones, there is a second mechanism often cited by
which extender particles smaller than TiO
2
particles can
increase opacity. In this mechanism, nano-sized extender
particles randomly get in between TiO
2
particles,
increasing their spacing and thus enhancing their light
scattering abilities.
Intuitively, this seems to be reasonable, and this
mechanism is, in fact, widely accepted within the coatings
industry.
8-17
However, there is some controversy about
it,
18-20
with researchers on both sides of the argument
citing experimental evidence that support their respective
positions. A theoretical resolution of this debate has been
reported wherein a Monte-Carlo simulation approach
was used to determine the extent to which TiO
2
particle
spacing is improved by the presence of small (nano-sized)
extender particles.
21
The results of this study refute the
proposition that such randomly placed nano-particles
have a positive impact on TiO
2
spacing. Instead, the
results showed that TiO
2
positioning within a paint film is
indifferent to the presence of nano-particles.
A B
TiO
2
Particle TiO
2
Particle
Figure 4Crowding effect of extender particles. (a) Pigment
scattering with large extender particles; (b) pigment scattering
with no extender.
Figure 5Crowding effect diminished by replacing large
extender particles with smaller extender particles.
COATINGSTECH
33
February 2013
While randomly positioned nano-particles do not
enhance TiO
2
spacing, targeted positioned nano-particles
can. By targeted positioning, we mean that the nano-
particles are attached directly to the surface of the TiO
2

pigment particles. By doing this, the probability that one
or more nano-particles will get in between TiO
2
pigment
particles that might otherwise be touching is greatly
increased. This creates a stand-off distance of similar
dimensions to the nano-particle. Targeted spacer particles
can be either inorganic
22
or organic.
23
Their effectiveness
is determined not by their composition, but rather by their
physical size and ability to adhere to TiO
2
particles rather
than remain unattached in the film matrix.
HIGHLY COATED TIO
2
GRADES
There is a second route for improving TiO
2
light
scattering efficiency that is closely related to targeted
spacingthe encapsulation of the TiO
2
particles by a
thick, porous material. This coating material, which is,
in practice, aluminosilicates, needs to be thick enough
to effectively prevent close contact of the TiO
2
portion
of these pigments and highly porous, because a solid
coating would unnecessarily dilute the TiO
2
content of
the pigment. Even with high porosity, these coatings
dilute the weight percent TiO
2
in the pigment to roughly
80%, decreasing the number of TiO
2
particles per pound
of pigment.
Targeted spacer particles or thick porous coatings
are most effective in high-PVC systems because, under
low PVC conditions, there is plenty of room for TiO
2

particles to spread out, with only the occasional random
close contact between the pigment particles. At higher
PVC, where crowding is high and TiO
2
TiO
2
contacts are
inevitable, targeted spacer particles or a thick porous
coating on the pigment particles can significantly
increase TiO
2
scattering efficiency.
The effectiveness of porous coatings is shown in
Figure 6. In the figure, the spread rates of three paints
that are identical except for the TiO
2
pigment used are
compared. Each paint has a total PVC of 46% and a TiO
2

pigment content of 20%, and the pigments examined
were a multipurpose grade (93% TiO
2
), a universal grade
(also 93% TiO
2
), and a TiO
2
pigment coated with 18%
porous aluminosilicate (82% TiO
2
). As can be seen, the
highest spread rate is seen for the pigment with the
porous coating, despite the fact that there are 11% fewer
TiO
2
particles per pound of pigment than for the other
two grades.
Based on these results, a larger study was
undertaken to quantify the benefits of a highly coated
TiO
2
grade in a range of formulations. The intention was
to identify the formulation space over which such a grade
would offer clear opacity advantages over multipurpose
and universal TiO
2
pigments. In this study, we looked at
60 formulas encompassing five TiO
2
PVCs, three total
PVCs, and two pigment grades (a universal control and
the highly coated grade). Within this formulation space,
we found a distinct region where the highly coated TiO
2

grade allowed for a reduction in TiO
2
PVC while holding
total film hide constant (Figure 7). TiO
2
pigment savings
of up to 21% are possible by replacing the universal
grade with a highly treated TiO
2
grade in a high TiO
2

loading, high PVC application.
As with the other optimization technologies discussed,
there are also constraints on the use of highly treated
TiO
2
pigments. First, the dilution of the TiO
2
particles with
the aluminosilicate surface coating reduces the number
of TiO
2
particles per pound of pigment. As seen in Figure
7, these highly treated TiO
2
grades will be less efficient
than universal grades in coatings where the TiO
2
content
is low and TiO
2
particle spacing is not an issue. This
dilution effect reduces the wet hiding performance of the
pigment. In addition, the porous aluminosilicate coating
also increases the oil absorption of the highly treated TiO
2

grade which will lower the CPVC of the coating. Finally,
these highly treated TiO
2
grades will diminish the gloss of
the coating, which is why they are sometimes referred to
as flat grades.
Figure 6Value of highly treated TiO
2
in 47% PVC flat coating.
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Highly
Treated
TiO
2
Highly
Treated
TiO
2
Multi-
Purpose
TiO
2
Universal
TiO
2
H
i
d
i
n
g

(
m
2
/
l
)
20 vol% TiO
2
in all coatings
Figure 7Potential percentage of TiO
2
savings
with highly treated TiO
2
.
E
C
H
IP
(
-
6
)
(
-
3
)
0
3
6
9
1
2
1
5
1
8
2
1
65
60
55
50
45
150 200 250 300 350
TiO
2
_content
gram/liter
P
V
C
February 2013
34
COATINGSTECH
CONCLUSIONS
With TiO
2
in short supply, it is critical that the paint
formulator use this pigment as efficiently as possible.
One way to increase paint opacity is by incorporating
air voids into the dry film. This enhances the scattering
efficiency of the TiO
2
pigment by decreasing the average
refractive index of the film matrix and, in some situations,
introduces light scattering centers from the air voids
themselves. The decrease in average index results in a
larger difference in refractive index between the TiO
2
and
the film matrix, which, in turn, increases the scattering
intensity of light as it enters and exits the TiO
2
particles.
Two methods of incorporating air voids have been
identified. First, paints can be formulated above CPVC.
While this is very economical (air is free), it can lead to
degradation in the physical integrity of the paint film,
resulting in poor stain resistance and scrub. Alternatively,
hollow sphere opaque pigments can be used to bring
air voids into the film. Like the voids present in paints
formulated above the CPVC, these air voids increase the
scattering efficiency of the TiO
2
particles by decreasing
the average refractive index of the paint matrix. In
addition, HSOP voids are of the appropriate size to
scatter light in their own right, adding to the opacity of
the film. However, these benefits are balanced by the
fact that HSOPs do not offer any wet-hide, and can also
result in higher PVC than is optimal for the desired paint
performance.
In addition, the degree to which TiO
2
pigment
particles crowd one another has a significant effect on
the light scattering efficiency of this pigment and thus
the opacity of the paint. Close particleparticle contacts
interfere with the mechanism by which TiO
2
scatters
light, and, to the extent feasible, paint formulators
should provide conditions that allow these particles to
remain as far from one another as possible. In high-PVC
applications, however, this cannot always be done, and
other strategies for maximizing light scattering should
be considered. These include replacing large extender
particles with smaller ones, and attaching small spacer
particles or a thick layer of porous aluminosilicate
onto the pigment surface. While this reduces the
TiO
2
content of the pigment, and thus the number of
scattering centers per pound, this dilution is more than
made up for in crowded systems by the boost seen
in TiO
2
efficiency. We recommend that, in high-PVC
applications, the formulator should consider TiO
2
grades
specifically designed to prevent close TiO
2
TiO
2
particle
contacts, such as those grades that have a thick, porous
aluminosilicate coating.
The information set forth herein is furnished free of charge and based
on technical data that DuPont believes to be reliable. It is intended
for use by persons having technical skill, at their own risk. Since
conditions of use are outside our control, we make no warranties,
expressed or implied, and assume no liability in connection with any
use of this information. Nothing herein is to be taken as license to
operate under, or a recommendation to infringe upon any patents.
References
1. Fitzwater, S., and Hook, J.W., Dependent Scattering Theory:
A New Approach to Predicting Scattering in Paints, J. Coat.
Technol., 57, 39 (1985).
2. Mie, G., Beitrge zur Optik trber Medien, speziell kolloidaler
Metallsungen, Leipzig, Ann. Phys., 330, 377 (1908).
3. Ross, W.D., Theoretical Light-Scattering Power of TiO
2
and Mi-
crovoids, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 13 (1), 45 (1974).
4. Patton, T.C., Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion: A Rheologi-
cal Approach to Coating and Ink, 2nd Ed., Wiley-Interscience,
Hoboken, NJ (1979).
5. Mussard, I., 25 Years of Hollow-Sphere Hiding Technology,
Paint Coat. Ind., 21 (9), 96 (2005).
6. 3tieg, l.B., Uilution Lftoienoy of Lxtenders," J. Coat. Technol.,
53 (680), 75 (1981).
7. Stieg, F.B., Effect of Extender on Crowding of Titanium Pig-
ment, J. Coat. Technol., 61 (778), 67 (1989).
8. Dietz, P.F. The Effect of Fine-Particle-Size Extenders and
Entrapped Air on TiO
2
in Emulsion Paint, Paint Coat. Ind., 9,
2 (2003).
9. Gittins, D., Gadson, M., and Skuse. D., Mineral Blends for
Low-Titania Coatings. WO 2010/143068 Al, 2010.
10. Stewart, D., An End to Overcrowding: Hydrous Kaolin Opti-
mizes Paint Opacity by Improving TiO
2
Spacing. Eur. Coat. J.,
5, 178 (2007).
11. Hirani, H., Dighe, A., Patel, C., Staying Apart: TiO
2
Pigments
Can Be Partly Replaced by Calcium Aluminium Silicate Extend-
ers, Eur. Coat. J., 3, 24 (2007).
12. Braun, J.H., Crowding and Spacing of Titanium Dioxide Pig-
ments. J. Coat. Technol., 60 (758), 67 (1988).
13. Temperley, J., Westwood, M.J., Hornby, M.R., Simpson, L.A.,
Use of a Mathematical Model to Predict the Effects of Extend-
ers on Pigment Dispersion in Paint Films, J. Coat. Technol.,
64 (809), 33 (1992).
14. Ashek, L, New Generation Kaolin-Based Pigment Extenders,
Paint Coat. Ind., 19 (3) 80 (2003).
15. Ashek, L, New Generation Kaolin-Based Pigment Extenders,
Surf. Coat. Int. Part A: Coat. J.. 85 (6) 223 (2002).
16. Kaye, B.H. and Clark, G.G., Computer Aided Image Analysis
Procedures for Characterizing the Stochastic Structure of
Chaotically Assembled Pigmented Coatings, Part. Syst.
Charact., 9, 157 (1992).
17. Fellers, A. and Christian, H-D, Filling Up Paint, PPCJ, 195
(4484), 26 (2005).
18. Stieg, F.B., Ending the Crowding/Spacing Theory Debate, J.
Coat. Technol., 59 (748), 96 (1987).
19. Hook, J., Conclusions on Crowding/Spacing Theory Clari-
ted." J. Coat. Technol., 58 (742), 81 (1986).
20. Cutrone, L., lntuenoe of line-Partiole 3ize Lxtenders on the
Optical Properties of Latex Paints, J. Coat. Technol., 58 (736),
83 (1986).
21. Diebold, M.P., A Monte Carlo Determination of the Effective-
ness of Nanoparticles as Spacers for Optimizing TiO
2
Opacity,
J. Coat. Technol. Res., 8 (5), 541 (2011).
22. Bolt, J.D., TiO
2
Light 3oattering Lftoienoy when lnoorporated
in Coatings, U.S. 5,650,002 (1997).
23. Adamson, L. and Fasano, D., Polymeric Hiding Technologies
That Make TiO
2
Work Smarter, Paint Coat. Ind., June (2011).
AUTHORS
Michael Diebold, Robert Kwoka, and David Mukoda,
DuPont Titanium Technologies, Wilmington, DE (USA);
[email protected].
COATINGSTECH
35
February 2013