Scribd
Upload
490 views

How To Design A Winning Business Model

This document summarizes a Harvard Business Review case study about business model innovation. It discusses how companies can compete more effectively through business models. Key points include: focusing only on creating innovative models in a vacuum is a common mistake; the success of a model depends on how it interacts with competitors; and companies should consider building virtuous cycles that strengthen their own models while weakening competitors'. Tactics implement strategies, while business models define how a company operates and creates value.

Uploaded by

Karel Haan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
490 views

How To Design A Winning Business Model

This document summarizes a Harvard Business Review case study about business model innovation. It discusses how companies can compete more effectively through business models. Key points include: focusing only on creating innovative models in a vacuum is a common mistake; the success of a model depends on how it interacts with competitors; and companies should consider building virtuous cycles that strengthen their own models while weakening competitors'. Tactics implement strategies, while business models define how a company operates and creates value.

Uploaded by

Karel Haan
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

How to Design A Winning Business Model

HBR Case Study by Ramon Casadesus-Masanell and Joan E. Ricart

Presented By Ashok Kalra 10/MBA/20 Ashruti Khera 10/MBA/21 Ishha Nagrath 10/MBA/24 Ishita Gupta 10/MBA/25

About the authors:


Ramon Casadesus Masanell: An associate professor at Harvard business school in Boston.

Joan E. Ricart: carl Schroder professor of Strategic Management and Economics at IESE Business School in Barcelona.

Competing through Business Models:


In the January-February 2010 issue of the Harvard Business Review, authors Ramon Casadesus-Masanell and Joan E. Ricart explore business model innovation in an article entitled How to Design a Winning Business Model. The article focuses on how companies might compete more effectively through business models.

In a nutshell:
Executives believe competing through business models is critical for success, few understand how best to do so. One common mistake: Focus on creating innovative models and evaluating their efficacy in standalone fashion Akin to engineers testing new technologies or products. The success or failure depends on how it interacts with other players in the industry. Companies build them without considering competition - They routinely deploy doomed business models. Many companies ignore Dynamic Elements of Business Models. E.g. Microsoft, eBay, and Facebook.

Business Models
What they are:
1. 2. The story that explains how an enterprise works. Answering the question Who is your customer, what does the customer value, and how do you deliver value at an appropriate cost.

Business Models
Why we need them NOW:
1. 2. 3. 4. Deregulation, technological change, globalization, and sustainability have rekindled interest. Pressure to crack open markets in developing nations. Economic slowdown is forcing companies to modify or create new business models. Rise of new technology based, low-cost rivals.

Business Models
Limitation and Challenges:
1. Companies focus on creating innovative models, evaluating efficacy in a vacuum. Propensity to ignore potential of dynamic business models. Undervaluing virtuous cycles.

2.

Business Model
Characteristics of a Good Business Model:
1. 2. 3. Aligned with company goals. Self-reinforcing. Robustness.

Business Model
Choices VS Consequences:

Generating a Virtuous Cycle


Competitive advantage of companies stems largely from their accumulated assets They are consequences of BM choices. Favorable consequences enable further choices. Process generates Virtuous Cycles. As cycles spin, company stocks grow, enhancing competitive advantage. Virtuous cycles, over time, expand both value creation and capture. E.g. Ryan Air, Irizar.

Generating a Virtuous Cycle


Beware the vicious cycle: 1. 2. Virtuous Cycles reach a limit, triggering counterbalancing cycles. VC slow down due to interaction with other BMs When interrupted, synergies work in opposite direction, eroding competitive advantage. E.g. Had Ryan Airs employees unionized/ demanded higher wages.

Generating a Virtuous Cycle


Ryan Air VS Irizar:
1. Virtuous Cycles are not the birthright of low-cost, nofrills players. Differentiators may also create VC. Focus on customer driven value and exploit innovation and empowered workforce.

2.

Competing with Business Models


S Group VS Kesko:
1. To compete with rivals having similar BM, companies must quickly build rigid consequences; create and capture more value. S Group, being a consumer cooperative may gain market share by offering customers bonuses on lowering prices BUT Kesko may increase profitability though its superior shopping experience.

2.

Competing with Business Models


Strengthening your own:
Boeing VS Airbus 1. Boeings 747 enjoyed monopoly until Airbus, afraid that the European subsidies currently keeping it afloat would soon dry up, took the bold step by introducing Airbus 380. 2. Helped decelerate Boeings VC.

Competing with Business Models


Weaken Competitors cycles:
Microsoft VS Linux 1. Get ahead by using rigid consequences of choices to weaken new entrants VC. 2. Microsoft used relationship with OEMs to preinstall Windows, keeping Linux customer base limited. 3. Spread fear and uncertainty about Linux

Competing with Business Models


Turn competitors into complements:
Betfair VS Ladbrokes and William Hill. 1. When a BM creates an environment conducive for the practices of its rivals without hampering its own market share. 2. Converts substitute goods into complementary ones. 3. Incumbents less likely to respond aggressively.

Then what is Strategy?


Business model refers to the logic of a company1. How it operates 2. How it creates value 3. How it captures value of stake holders in competitive market place

Whereas Strategy is the plan to create a unique and valuable position involving a distinctive set of activities

And Tactics?
Strategy focuses essentially on deciding on what the organization is trying to do, what it is trying to become within its business environment. Changing strategy is difficult and often causes problems. Tactic is the implementation of the strategy. It is the set of management decisions focused on how to achieve the strategic objectives.

BM VS Strategy VS Tactics
Examples: 1. Once the organization decides that it wants to be a widget manufacturer, there are many decisions that must be made about how to profitably manufacture widgets. Metro, the worlds largest newspaperBusiness Model: Ad sponsored free newspaper. Tactic: You cannot manipulate the price of the PRODUCT itself, only the ads.

2.

Essentially
Business Model Strategy Tactic

You might also like