The Dana Foundation: Design A Brain Experiment Competition
Uploaded by
cristina_bartlebyThe Dana Foundation: Design A Brain Experiment Competition
Uploaded by
cristina_bartlebyThe Dana Foundation
Design a Brain Experiment Competition
The Dana Foundation is devoted to promoting an interest in brain research in schools across the country. Encouraging students to take an interest in scientific research, especially related to the brain, is crucial, not only for students, but also for the future development of neuroscience. Therefore, the Dana Foundation will be sponsoring a competition for high school students in the United States. The challenge is for students to design an original brain-related experiment. These experiments can be designed to test creative theories about daily brain activity, brain disorders and diseases, and brain functions. However, students/classrooms should not complete their experiments. Students should view these submissions as research proposals rather than completed research. This competition is focused on students using their knowledge of the human brain and the scientific method of inquiry to develop innovative ideas and theories about the human brain. Experiments will be judged on creativity and originality as well as adherence to the scientific method. Students must submit their experiments through a teacher or other school official. Each teacher is limited to five submissions in total. Classrooms will compete for a $500 prize and a $250 second place prize.
Deadline:
Send entries to [email protected] no later than Thursday, January 17, 2013. First and second place winners will be announced during Brain Awareness Week (March 11-17, 2013).
Guidelines
1. All experiments must be submitted by a high school teacher, school official or afterschool program coordinator. a. Limit of five (5) submissions per instructor. 2. Only students in grades 9-12 may compete. 3. Submissions are limited to five pages (four pages + one page for references). 4. Submissions must come from high schools in the United States only. 5. Experiments must be the work of the students. a. Must be an original experiment (Students cannot copy or use a previously tested brain-related experiment) b. Citations required for sources and experiments used. 6. Submissions received after the deadline will not be eligible to compete.
7. Experiment designs not related to the brain and its functions and/or malfunctions will not be eligible to compete. 8. Each submission must consist of a written description of the experiment following the scientific method including: i. Purpose: What is the goal of the experiment? What scientific question is it attempting to answer and why is it important? ii. Hypothesis/Question: What is the general theory that you are testing? What do you think the outcome of the experiment will be and why? What is the experiment anticipated to demonstrate if the hypothesis is correct? iii. Background: What current scientific information suggests that the hypothesis might be correct? Be sure to cite sources. iv. Methodology: Provide a detailed plan/blueprint of the step-by-step process for how you would conduct your experiment. The methodology section should contain a description of each step of the experiment including the necessary equipment, (MRI, CAT, PET etc. scanners, electrical brain recording devices, videos, electron microscopes etc.) materials (such as autopsy tissue cultures etc), and numbers of test participants. Describe what outcomes you will measure, and how you will measure them (include images/figures/charts if necessary). v. Results: The Dana Foundation does not want completed experiments for submission. Instead of completing their experiments, students should describe how they would use their hypothetical results to prove or disprove their hypothesis if they were to carry out their experiment. This section need only include a brief description of how data would be utilized, organized, and analyzed in order to test the validity of their hypothesis. vi. Conclusions: In this section, students should discuss the implications of their proposed experiment on neuroscience and our understanding of the brain. First, a discussion of the implications if their hypothesis was proven correct. Second, a discussion of alternate outcomes and what they might suggest about the brain. And finally, the conclusion should also mention any further research that would be needed if the data were to suggest that their hypothesis was correct. Because the experiments are focused on the human brain, submissions should discuss any relevant ethical issues that might arise if they conducted their experiment. vii. Bibliography: List 5-10 sources used for background scientific research.
Judging/Criteria
Experiments will be judged and scored based on a set of four categories. These categories will be judged on a 1-5 scale, five being the highest rating and one being the lowest. Thus, the highest possible score would be a 20. In the likely event that multiple experiments will receive the same high score, the tiebreaker will go to the experiment that is most innovative and creative. 1. Significance: An experiment that scores well in this category will have a meaningful purpose that is designed to improve our understanding of the brain. This includes brain disorders, brain health, brain anatomy, and function. Basically, experiments should attempt to prove or disprove a theory related to the brain that is both interesting and important to understanding the brain and how it functions or malfunctions. 2. References & Scientific Knowledge: Experiments should illustrate a knowledge and understanding of related scientific facts and theories. Students must cite all outside sources referenced or used in their submission. 3. Adherence to the Scientific Method: In order to score well in this category an experiment should show a basic adherence to the Scientific Method for scientific inquiry. To do so, the experiment should follow the steps detailed under the guidelines section (ie: purpose, hypothesis, methodology, etc). 4. Overall Completeness/Presentation: The highest ranking experiments in this category will be well organized, well-presented, and provide a clear and thoughtful design for an experiment that follows the instructions in the guideline section.
Tiebreaker
Innovation/Creativity: The key to winning the tiebreaker category is designing an experiment that is testing a creative scientific question. An experiment ranking especially high in this category will attempt to explore an area of brain research that has received less attention in the past and present. You do not need a completed experiment, therefore, there is no excuse; get creative!
Winners:
One winner and one runner-up will be chosen and announced during Brain Awareness Week in March, 2013. The winning submission will receive a $500 prize and the runner-up will receive a $250 prize. Additionally, both experiments will be posted on the Dana Foundation website and receive a certificate from the Dana Foundation.
