psmmCHAP 14
psmmCHAP 14
MAD
Calculated Heat from the arc
Date
Disclaimer
The information contained in this manual regarding commercial products or firms may not be used for advertising or promotional purposes and is not to be construed as an endorsement by Western Area Power Administration (Western) of any product or firm. The information contained in this manual was developed for Western; no warranty as to the accuracy, usefulness, or completeness is expressed or implied when used by other entities.
Preface
This guide is issued by the Western Area Power Administration (Western) and is designed to provide specific guidelines, instructions, procedures, and criteria for assessing and mitigating the arc hazard exposure near energized transmission lines and equipment. Procedures and guidelines are in accordance with Westerns Power System Safety Manual (PSSM). Corrections or comments concerning this guide may be addressed to: Western Area Power Administration Attn: A3900, CSO Maintenance P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, Colorado 80228-8213
ii
Type of Suggested Revision: Addition, Deletion, Rewording, Other (Circle one) SUGGESTED NEW WORDING:
____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ REASON FOR REVISION: ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Revision recommended by: ____________________________________ Mail Code: _______________
Name
Date: _____________________
Please return to: Western Area Power Administration CSO Maintenance, Attn: A3900 P.O. Box 281213 Lakewood, CO 80228
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 1.2 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 1.3 Interpretations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 2 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2.2 Prohibited Material . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3 2.3 Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 2.4 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 3 ARC EXPOSURE THRESHOLDS AND PARAMETERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3.1 High Voltage Work (69 kV and Above) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3.1.1 Arc Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3.1.2 Arc Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3.1.3 Distance from the Arc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3.1.4 Calculated Trigger Currents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 3.1.5 Fault Currents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 3.2 Low Voltage Work (Below 69 kV) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.2.1 Arc Duration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 3.2.2 Arc Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.2.3 Distance from the Arc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.2.4 Calculated Trigger Currents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.2.5 Fault Currents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 4 ARC FLASH EXPOSURE ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.1 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.2 Initial (General) Fault Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.3 Transmission Line Trigger Current Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.3.1 Initial Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.3.2 Secondary Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 4.3.3 Actual Exposure Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4.4 Substation Trigger Current Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4.5 Low Voltage Trigger Current Comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4.6 Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4.7 Levels of Exposure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
iv
5 ARC EXPOSURE CONTROLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 5.1 Operational Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 5.2 Working Distance Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 5.3 Flame Resistant Clothing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 5.4 Deenergized Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14 6 COLD WEATHER CLOTHING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 6.1 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 6.2 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15
3.1.1 Arc Duration (High Voltage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 3.1.2 Arc Gap (High Voltage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3.1.3 Distance From the Arc (High Voltage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6 3.1.4 Trigger Currents (High Voltage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
3.2
3.2.2 Minimum Distance between Live Parts and Ground . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.2.3 Distance from the Arc (Low Voltage) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 3.2.4 A Category I Trigger Current Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 3.2.4 B Category II Trigger Current Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 3.2.4 C Category III Trigger Current Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 3.2.4 D Category IV Trigger Current Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10 FIGURE TITLE PAGE
1 Illustration of Distance Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7 4.3.3 Relay Fault Clearing Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 4.1 Arc Flash Exposure Analysis Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13
vi
1. General
1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to define the maximum (acceptable) level of heat, generated from an arc-blast, that a worker can be exposed to, and be in compliance with Westerns Power System Safety Manual. This chapter also provides a means of quantifying and determining the maximum level of heat that a worker is exposed to in the event of an arc fault at the work site based on Westerns maintenance procedures. All work within close proximity to energized equipment requires knowledge of the level of arc hazard exposure. 1.2 Definitions. Arc Current This is the r.m.s. value of the current in the arc. Arc Duration This is the time span of the arc from initiation to extinction, specified as a number of cycles of 60 Hz current. Arc Energy The total energy discharged to the surrounding space by an electric arc. Arc Gap The length of the arc, or distance between the arc electrodes. Arc Thermal Protective Value The arc thermal protective value (ATPV) for a piece of clothing is the minimum incident thermal energy that causes the onset of a second degree burn based on the energy transmitted through the clothing. Close Proximity Distance Based on the voltage of an energized piece of equipment, this distance is less than or equal to the minimum approach distance to live parts for non-electrical workers, but not less than the minimum approach distance to live parts for electrical workers. Clothing Weight The weight of material making up the clothing that is worn by the employee, measured in ounces per square yard (OPSY). Cycle One cycle equals 1/60 of a second. Heat Flux The thermal intensity of the arc that is incident by the amount of energy transmitted per unit area and per unit of time, measured in calories per square centimeters per second (Cal/cm2/sec). Ignition Threshold The minimum value (associated with an accepted low probability) of heat energy at which a material will reach ignition temperature and start to burn. Incident Heat The value of energy that is measured (in calories) on the receiving surface. Primary Fault Clearing The fastest time a fault clears, in cycles, based on zone 1 relaying. Secondary Fault Clearing The time a fault clears, in cycles, based on zone 2 relaying (aka backup clearing time). Trigger Current The amount of current present in an arc that is required to generate enough heat to reach the ignition threshold of the clothing worn by the employee exposed to the arc. System fault currents above this value will trigger an additional evaluation. Currents below this value are considered as reasonable exposure.
1.3 Interpretations. May Permissive choice (may equals is permitted). Shall or Must Mandatory under normal conditions (must or shall equals is required to. Will Mandatory, but allowing the responsible employee or party some discretion as to when, where and how. Should Advisory. Should statements represent the best advise available at the time of printing (should equals is recommended that).
2. Regulatory Requirements
2.1 Background. A memorandum of interpretation from D.O.L. Deputy Assistant Secretary, dated 8/10/95 states that cotton clothing is permitted if the following two conditions hold true: The employer has determined that the possible electric arc exposure is less than that posed by an 3,800 ampere arc that is 12 inches long and 12 inches away from the employee and lasts for 10 cycles (1/6 of a second); and The clothing being worn will not ignite under the electric arc or flame conditions to which the employee could be exposed. Since some maintenance activities have the potential to place workers in the vicinity of an arc flash, all locations where maintenance is performed in the vicinity of live parts must be evaluated to determine the maximum potential level of exposure to the arc flash (heat received from the arc flash). The maximum potential level of exposure (measured in calories per square centimeter) shall not be greater than 4.6 calories per square centimeter. The figure of 4.6 calories per square centimeters of heat is the amount of heat that is required to ignite the minimum weight of clothing that can be worn by an employee (refer to Table 2.1). Table 2.1 shows the 10% probability of ignition at a 95% confidence level for various weight cotton fabrics. The level of exposure is based on four parameters indicated in the above mentioned memo; arc length, arc duration, distance from the arc, and the current magnitude in the arc. Each work location has an assumed arc length (based on the voltage), an assumed distance away from the arc (based on the work practices), and an assumed arc duration (based on system relaying). Given these assumptions, a current magnitude can be calculated that will generate 4.6 calories per square centimeters of heat. The calculated value for the current is referred to as the trigger current.
Table 2.1 Ignition Threshold for Cotton Fabrics. Fabric Description Weight
5.2 6.2 6.9 8.0 8.3 11.9 12.8 13.3
Color
Blue White Blue Black White Tan Blue Blue
Weave
Twill Fleece Twill Twill Sateen Duck Denim Denim
Material Type
Shirt Shirt Shirt Shirt or Pants Shirt or Pants Shirt or Pants Jeans Jeans
2.2 Prohibited Material. Wearing clothing that contains acetate, nylon, polyester, or rayon, either alone or in blends is prohibited unless it is worn in a manner that eliminates the hazard involved. Hazards that exist during the wearing of prohibited material stated in the OSHA letter of interpretation include the following: If the layer of clothing made from a prohibited material is worn as the outside layer of clothing, there is a hazard that the fabric could ignite and burn the employees face. Continued burning, likely, would burn other parts of the employees body at some point.
If a layer of clothing made from a prohibited material is worn as a middle layer of clothing, and if enough heat passed through the outer layer(s), there is a hazard that the fabric also could ignite (assuming sufficient air flow). If a layer of clothing made from a prohibited material is worn as the inside layer of clothing, there is a hazard that the fabric could melt in contact with the employee's skin thereby causing a burn injury. The employer must be able to demonstrate that a prohibited material worn by an employee does not cause the aforementioned hazards. 2.3 Practice. Protection from arc flash burns is accomplished through various administrative and engineering controls such as performing the work in the deenergized mode or performing work that is not in proximity to energized parts. Administrative and engineering controls are Westerns preferred practice for mitigating the arc hazard. The arc hazard In most cases should be considered during the following type of work: Switching. Work inside battery rooms. Grounding Applications. Deenergized work on double circuits (one circuit energized). Low-voltage maintenance applications. Substations; station service, racking breakers. Work in proximity to energized parts is any work performed by a qualified electrical worker that requires approaching live parts within the distances specified in the Power System Safety Manual, Table A2. While performing work in proximity to live parts, workers shall (as a minimum) be protected from arc flashes to the extent that their clothing will not ignite, increasing the injury that could be sustained. 2.4 Procedure. There are three maintenance procedures where engineering and administrative controls must be closely assessed to determine if the work practices and procedures adequately protect the worker from the arc exposure hazard. These include 1. hotstick work, 2. barehand work and 3. denergized work that that is in close proximity to energized equipment. For these maintenance practices, specific locations and maintenance procedures must be analyzed to determine if there is sufficient energy to generate 4.6 calories per square centimeters of heat at the workers location.
* NOTE: Choosing the appropriate fault clearing time requires knowledge of the system. For substations it is normally appropriate to use primary clearing times based on the amount of protection present for substation equipment. For transmission lines, some sections of the line may only clear through secondary protection. Using values that are Regional specific is also acceptable. An example of this would be transmission lines with pilot protection versus lines with non-pilot relaying. Transmission lines with non-pilot relaying usually provide high speed simultaneous protection for only 70 to 80 percent of the faults in the middle section of the line. For a fault outside this boundary, the terminal nearest the fault would open that end of the line at high speed, and the remote terminal bus will open after a time delay. Therefore, lines with non-pilot relaying may routinely fully clear faults within the times stated in the {secondary fault clearing times column above.
3.1.2 Arc Gap. Arc gap (length) directly effects the level of heat transferred to a receiving surface; as the length increases, the amount of heat that is transferred increases. It is assumed that as a worker is performing a task, the initial arc is struck when a worker takes a conductive article within the 60 Hz breakdown distance in air. The dielectric strength of air is taken at 10 kV per inch. The calculated arc gap lengths are shown in Table 3.1.2.
3.1.3 Distance from the Arc. The primary purpose of the minimum approach distance to live parts (MAD) is to protect workers from electrocution, not for protection from the heat generated in an arc flash. Also, after an arc is initiated, it cannot be confined to a safe distance while the worker is at the MAD. Therefore, the value used for the distance from the arc must be less than the MAD. There are three assumptions made in determining the distances shown in Table 3.1.3: The MAD would not be violated by the workers body, and The arc will travel directly toward the employee (i.e., the shortest distance between the employee and the arc is assumed). The distance between the arc and the employee is the MAD minus two times the assumed arc gap length for the given voltage (refer to Figure 1). The last assumption is a safety factor to allow for mechanical failure causing a violation of the MAD.
MAD (inches)
39 38 43 48 63 102 135
Grounded object
Energized object
Two times the arc length (Safety factor) Distance from the arc (calculated) Actual arc length
MAD
3.1.4 Calculated Trigger Currents. Using the parameters stated above, the following trigger currents shown in table 3.1.4 were determined using the ARCPRO program. The trigger currents listed for each voltage represent the maximum acceptable level of exposure (rounded down to the nearest 100 amperes) for both primary and secondary clearing times. Trigger currents other than those listed below can be used as long as the parameters used to calculate them are verified and documented.
3.1.5 Fault Currents. An initial fault current calculation on all transmission lines and equipment (identified as an arc hazard exposure location) is required and shall be compared with the values in table 3.1.4. as outlined in detail in section 4. Subsequent fault current calculations are only required when a change is made to the system which has an effect on the fault magnitude. The type of fault that is calculated is a single line to ground fault (phase-to-ground). This is based on the assumption that, should a human error or mechanical failure occur during a maintenance procedure, the incident would occur on a single phase (as opposed to two or three phases or phase-to-phase).
Distances (inches)
34 29 32 36 46 72 93
Duration (Cycles)
45 (secondary) 6 (primary) 35 (secondary) 5 (primary) 35 (secondary) 5 (primary) 35 (secondary) 5 (primary) 35 (secondary) 5 (primary) 25 (secondary) 4 (primary) 20 (secondary) 3 (primary)
3.2 Low Voltage Work (Below 69 kV). Some low voltage work (voltages 46 kV and below) must be performed in close proximity to energized equipment. This may include work in energized panels, station service transformers, or on rack-type breaker installations. A major difference between low voltage work and transmission line work is the fault location. Section 3.1 assumes that all arc flashes occur in an open location (360 degree exposure) rather than in an enclosure such as a panel or cubicle. Testing performed with arcs in enclosures has shown incident heat levels will increase from 150% to 300%, based upon the geometry of the enclosure, versus the same energy level in a 360 degree arc exposure. For the purpose of calculating trigger currents to compare with fault currents, the acceptable level of heat generated in an arc flash can be categorized into 4 levels dependent on the geometry of the surrounding area of the fault location shown in table 3.2. 3.2.1 Arc Duration. Low voltage faults on equipment either have relay protection or fused (over current) protection. Relays will provide the same fault clearing times indicated in table 3.1.1 while fused protection will clear faults within 6 cycles. Therefore, as a worst case estimate, a 6 cycle clearing time will be used for all (low voltage) faults within a substation.
Table 3.2 - Fault Location Category (Low Voltage) Fault Location Category
I (no increase) II (100% increase) III (200% increase) IV (300% increase)
Geometry of Location
Open (360 degree exposure) One side covered (180 degree exposure) Two sides covered (90 degree exposure) Three sides covered (maximum exposure)
3.2.2 Arc Gap. The length of an arc in low voltage areas is more of a function of the faults surroundings than the voltage itself. Air breakdown would determine the initial arc length, however, since most low voltage areas are in close quarters (to grounded objects), it is likely the arc will move (elongate) toward other grounded objects before relays or fuses can clear the fault. As a worst case estimate, based on NEC design requirements and the American Electricians Handbook, the minimum distance between live parts and grounded objects is shown in table 3.2.2. These distances are based on a safety factor of 3 between live parts and ground.
Table 3.2.2 Minimum Distance between Live Parts and Ground Voltage
36 kV to 46 kV 15.1 kV to 36 kV .751 kV to 15 kV 301 to 750 Volts
3.2.3 Distance from the Arc. The MAD for voltages 46 kV and below is actually more conservative than high voltage MADs due to an inadvertent movement factor of two feet (for voltages 69 kV to 750 V). However, when in enclosed spaces, we should assume that the arc will likely travel toward the employee (worst case), encroaching on the MAD. Therefore, the assumed distance from the arc for low voltage energized work is the MAD, minus the arc length (refer to Table 3.2.3).
MAD (inches)
33 31 26 12
3.2.4 Calculated Trigger Currents. Using the parameters stated above, the following trigger currents shown in tables 3.2.4A through 3.2.4D were determined using the ARCPRO program. The trigger currents listed for each voltage represent the maximum acceptable level of exposure (rounded down to the nearest 100 amperes) for both primary and secondary clearing times. Trigger currents other than those listed below can be used as long as the parameters used to calculate them are verified and documented.
Distances (inches)
19.5 21 22.5 10.5
Duration (Cycles)
6 6 6 6
Distances (inches)
19.5 21 22.5 10.5
Duration (Cycles)
6 6 6 6
Distances (inches)
19.5 21 22.5 10.5
Duration (Cycles)
6 6 6 6
Distances (inches)
19.5 21 22.5 10.5
Duration (Cycles)
6 6 6 6
3.2.5 Fault Currents. An initial fault current calculation on only those busses and equipment where there is potential exposure to an arc flash shall be compared with the values in the appropriate table above (depending on the geometry of the surrounding area 3.2.4 A, B, C, or D). This comparison analysis is outlined in detail in section 4. Subsequent fault current calculations are only required when a change is made to the system that may have an effect on the fault magnitude. The type of fault that is calculated is either a phase to ground or phase to phase (which ever is higher) due to the configurations being closer together.
10
11
Figure 4.3.3. Relay Fault Clearing Zones Zone 1 for bus A Zone 2 for bus A
A
Fault 1 Fault 2
B
Primary clearing time from both ends Clearing times primary from B backup from A
Calculating the actual incident heat exposure for the remote ends of the line is only necessary for lines without pilot relaying. This calculation is done in two parts (identified as step 11 in the figure 1 flowchart). For the middle part of any line (approximately 60%) faults are cleared in the primary clearing time (refer to Fault 2 in Figure 4.3.3). For the portion of each line (approximately 20%) closest to each terminal, faults such as fault 1, will be cleared in the primary clearing time by the relay at the bus closest to the fault (bus A). However, the fault will still be fed from the remote bus (bus B) until the backup clearing time. This results in a two-stage fault. During the primary clearing time the fault magnitude will be higher, because it is being fed from both ends. Once the near bus clears, the fault reduces, but continues at a lower level until the remote bus clears. The current levels during each part of the fault must be considered separately; each for its portion during the total fault duration. The calculated heat for each portion is then added to see if the total energy is enough to reach the value of 4.6 cal/cm2. 4.4 Substations Trigger Current Comparison. For substation busses (outside work in substation yards) compare the fault study currents with the primary clearing trigger currents in table 2.4 (trigger currents based on high speed clearing times). The primary clearing trigger currents are applicable due to the amount of protection that is present for substation equipment. Substation busses and equipment that have a fault current magnitude less than the trigger current indicate that the worker is protected from arc flash hazards (to the extent that the workers clothing will not ignite). The protection is provided by existing engineering and administrative controls (system relaying and observing the proper minimum approach distances to live parts). 4.5 Low Voltage Trigger Current Comparison. For low voltage work, compare the fault study currents with the appropriate trigger current in table 3.4 A, B, C, or D (based on the location/geometry of the exposed energized equipment). Low voltage areas that have a fault current magnitude less than the trigger current indicate that the worker is protected from arc flash hazards (to the extent that the workers clothing will not ignite). The protection is provided by existing engineering and administrative controls (system relaying and observing the proper minimum approach distances to live parts). 4.6 Documentation. Document and file the phase to ground fault study and the comparison listing the lines, busses and equipment that have fault current magnitudes less than the trigger current values. For this equipment, no further action is needed, no change in work procedure is required, no additional protective apparel is required. Follow the established work procedures and safety requirements. 4.7 Levels of Exposure. Any transmission line, substation equipment, or low voltage equipment having a fault current magnitude greater than the applicable trigger current or a level of heat exposure greater than 4.6 Cal/cm2 is considered unacceptable. This indicates that established engineering and administrative controls currently in place are ineffective in preventing clothing ignition. Section 5 outlines several options that can be used for removing or reducing the arc hazard exposure to an acceptable level.
12
Perform a phase-to-ground fault study on all lines and busses maintained by Western
Compare values (1) with trigger currents (Tables 3.1.4 and 3.2.4) For busses compare with Primary Clearing Currents. For T-lines, compare with secondary clearing.
No
Are the fault study currents (1) greater than the trigger currents?
Yes
10
Document and file the comparison (1), (5), (6) and (7).
No
Is the fault study current greater than the new trigger current?
Compare fault current value (1) with new trigger current (6).
Yes
11
No
12
Yes
13
Determine the best control(s) for the region to use to prevent clothing ignition.
14
15
Increase separation distance (MAD) to a value that will prevent clothing ignition.
16
17
13
14
15
16
18