Chapter 9
Chapter 9
Solutions to Problems
Note to instructor: In most problems involving the internal rate of return calculation, a financial calculator
has been used.
P9-1.
LG 2: Payback Period
Basic
(a) $42,000 $7,000 = 6 years
(b) The company should accept the project, since 6 < 8.
P9-2.
LG 2: Payback Comparisons
Intermediate
(a) Machine 1: $14,000 $3,000 = 4 years, 8 months
Machine 2: $21,000 $4,000 = 5 years, 3 months
(b) Only Machine 1 has a payback faster than 5 years and is acceptable.
(c) The firm will accept the first machine because the payback period of 4 years, 8 months is less
than the 5-year maximum payback required by Nova Products.
(d) Machine 2 has returns which last 20 years while Machine 1 has only seven years of returns.
Payback cannot consider this difference; it ignores all cash inflows beyond the payback
period.
222
P9-3.
Year
Project A
Cash
Investment
Inflows
Balance
Year
$100,000
Project B
Cash
Investment
Inflows
Balance
$100,000
$10,000
90,000
40,000
60,000
20,000
70,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
40,000
20,000
10,000
40,000
10,000
20,000
20,000
LG 3: NPV
Basic
PVn = PMT (PVIFA14%,20 yrs) NPV = PVn Initial investment
(a) PVn = $2,000 6.623
PVn = $13,246
Chapter 9
P9-5.
14 %
PVn = $5,000 (4.639)
PVn = $23,195
NPV = PVn Initial investment
NPV = $23,195 $24,000
NPV = $805
Calculator solution: $805.68
Reject; negative NPV
P9-6.
LG 3: NPVIndependent Projects
Intermediate
Project A
PVn = PMT (PVIFA14%,10 yrs.)
PVn = $4,000 (5.216)
PVn = $20,864
NPV = $20,864 $26,000
NPV = $5,136
Calculator solution: $5,135.54
Reject
(b)
12 %
PVn = $5,000 (4.968)
PVn = $24,840
NPV = PVn Initial investment
NPV = $24,840 $24,000
NPV = $840
Calculator solution: $838.19
Accept; positive NPV
223
224
CF
$100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
PVIF14%,n
0.877
0.769
0.675
0.592
0.519
0.456
PV
$87,700
92,280
94,500
94,720
93,420
91,200
$553,820
CF
$20,000
19,000
18,000
17,000
16,000
15,000
14,000
13,000
12,000
11,000
PVIF14%,n
0.877
0.769
0.675
0.592
0.519
0.456
0.400
0.351
0.308
0.270
PV
$17,540
14,611
12,150
10,064
8,304
6,840
5,600
4,563
3,696
2,970
$86,338
Chapter 9
225
CF
$20,000
30,000
0
50,000
60,000
70,000
PVIF14%,n
0.592
0.519
0.400
0.351
0.308
PV
$11,840
15,570
0
20,000
21,060
21,560
$90,030
LG 3: NPV
Challenge
(a) PVA = $385,000 (PVIFA9%,5)
PVA = $385,000 (3.890)
PVA = $1,497,650
Calculator solution: $1,497,515.74
The immediate payment of $1,500,000 is not preferred because it has a higher present value
than does the annuity.
PVA
$1,500,000
(b) PMT =
=
= $385,604
PVIFA 9%, 5
3.890
Calculator solution: $385,638.69
(c) PVAdue = $385,000 (PVIFA9%,4 + 1)
PVAdue = $385,000 (3.24 + 1)
PVAdue = $385,000 (4.24)
PVAdue = $1,632,400
Changing the annuity to a beginning-of-the-period annuity due would cause Simes
Innovations to prefer the $1,500,000 one-time payment since the PV of the annuity due is
greater than the lump sum.
(d) No, the cash flows from the project will not influence the decision on how to fund the project.
The investment and financing decisions are separate.
226
P9-8.
P9-9.
Chapter 9
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
CF
$12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
25,000
PVIF15%,n
0.870
0.756
0.658
0.572
0.497
0.432
PV
$10,440
10,584
10,528
10,296
9,940
10,800
$62,588
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CF
$50,000
30,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
PVIF15%,n
0.870
0.756
0.658
0.572
0.497
0.432
0.376
0.327
Press
C
B
A
NPV
$15,070
2,588
4,234
PV
$43,500
22,680
13,160
11,440
9,940
12,960
15,040
16,350
$145,070
227
228
Payback Period
$40,000 $13,000 = 3.08 years
3 + ($10,000 $16,000) = 3.63 years
2 + ($5,000 $13,000) = 2.38 years
CF
$7,000
10,000
13,000
16,000
19,000
PVIF16%,n
0.862
0.743
0.641
0.552
0.476
PV
$6,034
7,430
8,333
8,832
9,044
$39,673
CF
$19,000
16,000
13,000
10,000
7,000
PVIF16%,n
0.862
0.743
0.641
0.552
0.476
PV
$16,378
11,888
8,333
5,520
3,332
$45,451
Chapter 9
229
It can be computed to the nearest whole percent by the estimation method as shown for Project A
below or by using a financial calculator. (Subsequent IRR problems have been solved with a
financial calculator and rounded to the nearest whole percent.)
Project A
Average Annuity = ($20,000 + $25,000 + 30,000 + $35,000 + $40,000) 5
Average Annuity = $150,000 5
Average Annuity = $30,000
PVIFAk%,5yrs. = $90,000 $30,000 = 3.000
PVIFA19%,5 yrs. = 3.0576
PVlFA20%,5 yrs. = 2.991
However, try 17% and 18% since cash flows are greater in later years.
Yeart
1
2
3
4
5
CFt
(1)
$20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
PVIF17%,t
(2)
0.855
0.731
0.624
0.534
0.456
Initial investment
NPV
PV@17%
[(1) (2)]
(3)
$17,100
18,275
18,720
18,690
18,240
$91,025
90,000
$1,025
PVIF18%,t
(4)
0.847
0.718
0.609
0.516
0.437
PV@18%
[(1) (4)]
(5)
$16,940
17,950
18,270
18,060
17,480
$88,700
90,000
$1,300
NPV at 17% is closer to $0, so IRR is 17%. If the firms cost of capital is below 17%, the project
would be acceptable.
Calculator solution: 17.43%
Project B
PVn = PMT (PVIFAk%,4 yrs.)
$490,000 = $150,000 (PVIFAk%,4 yrs.)
$490,000 $150,000 = (PVIFAk%,4 yrs.)
3.27 = PVIFAk%,4
8% < IRR < 9%
Calculator solution: IRR = 8.62%
The firms maximum cost of capital for project acceptability would be 8% (8.62%).
230
Project C
PVn = PMT (PVIFAk%,5 yrs.)
$20,000 = $7,500 (PVIFAk%,5 yrs.)
$20,000 $7,500 = (PVIFAk%,5 yrs.)
2.67 = PVIFAk%,5 yrs.
25% < IRR < 26%
Calculator solution: IRR = 25.41%
The firms maximum cost of capital for project acceptability would be 25% (25.41%).
Project D
$120,000 $100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$0 =
+
+
+
$240,000
1
2
3
(1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR)4
$100,000
$120,000 $150,000 $190,000 $250,000
+
+
+
+
$500,000
(1 + IRR)1
(1 + IRR)2 (1 + IRR)3 (1 + IRR)4 (1 + IRR)5
$0 =
$140,000
$120,000
$95,000
$70,000
$50,000
+
+
+
+
$325,000
1
2
3
4
(1 + IRR)
(1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR)5
Chapter 9
231
232
Press
C
D
B
NPV
$7,120
6,960
1,181
IRR
9.70%
15.63%
19.44%
17.51%
Since the lowest IRR is 9.7% all of the projects would be acceptable if the cost of capital was
approximately 10%.
NOTE: Since project A was the only reject project from the 4 projects, all that was needed to
find the minimum acceptable cost of capital was to find the IRR of A.
Chapter 9
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Project A
Cash
Investment
Inflows
Balance
$150,000
$45,000
105,000
45,000
60,000
45,000
15,000
45,000
+30,000
45,000
45,000
PaybackA =
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Project B
Cash
Investment
Inflows
Balance
$75,000
60,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
30,000
$150,000
75,000
15,000
+15,000
0
$150,000
= 3.33 years = 3 years 4 months
$45,000
PaybackB = 2 years +
$15,000
years = 2.5 years = 2 years 6 months
$30,000
233
234
(e)
Project
A
B
Payback
2
1
Rank
NPV
1
2
IRR
2
1
The project that should be selected is A. The conflict between NPV and IRR is due partially
to the reinvestment rate assumption. The assumed reinvestment rate of project B is 22.71%,
the projects IRR. The reinvestment rate assumption of A is 9%, the firms cost of capital. On
a practical level project B will probably be selected due to managements preference for
making decisions based on percentage returns, and their desire to receive a return of cash
quickly.
P9-17. LG 2, 3, 4: Payback, NPV, and IRR
Intermediate
(a) Payback period
3 + ($20,000 $35,000) = 3.57 years
(b) PV of cash inflows
Year
1
2
3
4
5
CF
$20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
PVIF16%,n
0.893
0.797
0.712
0.636
0.567
PV
$17,860
19,925
21,360
22,260
22,680
$104,085
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
+
+
+
+
$95,000
1
2
3
4
(1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR)5
IRR = 15%
Calculator solution: 15.36%
(d) NPV = $9,085; since NPV > 0; accept
IRR = 15%; since IRR > 12% cost of capital; accept
The project should be implemented since it meets the decision criteria for both NPV and IRR.
Chapter 9
235
CF
$25,000
35,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
PVIF12%,n
0.893
0.797
0.712
0.636
0.567
PV
$22,325
27,895
32,040
31,800
31,185
$145,245
$25,000
$35,000
$45,000
$50,000
$55,000
+
+
+
+
$130,000
1
2
3
4
(1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR)
(1 + IRR)5
IRR = 16%
Calculator solution: 16.06%
Based on the IRR the project is acceptable since the IRR of 16% is greater than the 12% cost
of capital.
Project B
PV of cash inflows:
Year
1
2
3
4
5
CF
$40,000
35,000
30,000
10,000
5,000
PVIF12%,n
0.893
0.797
0.712
0.636
0.567
PV
$35,720
27,895
21,360
6,360
2,835
$94,170
236
Based on the NPV the project is acceptable since the NPV is greater than zero.
$40,000
$35,000
$30,000
$10,000
$5,000
$0 =
+
+
+
+
$85,000
1
2
3
4
(1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR) (1 + IRR)
(1 + IRR)5
IRR = 18%
Calculator solution: 17.75%
Based on the IRR the project is acceptable since the IRR of 16% is greater than the 12% cost
of capital.
(c)
Net Present Value Profile
90000
80000
70000
60000
Net Present
Value ($)
50000
40000
NPV - A
30000
NPV - B
20000
10000
0
0
10
15
20
15%
$9,170
16%
0
18%
(d) The net present value profile indicates that there are conflicting rankings at a discount rate
lower than the intersection point of the two profiles (approximately 15%). The conflict in
rankings is caused by the relative cash flow pattern of the two projects. At discount rates
above approximately 15%, Project B is preferable; below approximately 15%, Project A is
better.
(e) Project A has an increasing cash flow from year 1 through year 5, whereas Project B has a
decreasing cash flow from year 1 through year 5. Cash flows moving in opposite directions
often cause conflicting rankings.
Chapter 9
237
A
$20,000
3 years
$10,340
20%
Project
B
$31,500
3.2 years
$10,786
17%
C
$32,500
3.4 years
$4,303
15%
(c) IRR
Project, A
NPV at 19% = $1,152.70
NPV at 20% = $187.76
Since NPV is closer to zero at 20%, IRR = 20%
Calculator solution: 19.86%
Project B
NPV at 17% = $779.40
NPV at 18% = $1,494.11
Project C
PVn = $32,500.00 3.517
PVn = $114,302.50
Project C
NPV at 14% = $1,575.13
NPV at 15% = $1,054.96
238
(d)
Comparative Net Present Value Profiles
70000
60000
50000
NPV - A
40000
Net Present
Value ($)
NPV - B
NPV - C
30000
20000
10000
0
0
10
15
20
25
0%
$40,000
$57,500
$52,500
13%
$10,340
10,786
4,303
15%
17%
20%
The difference in the magnitude of the cash flow for each project causes the NPV to compare
favorably or unfavorably, depending on the discount rate.
(e) Even though A ranks higher in Payback and IRR, financial theorists would argue that B is
superior since it has the highest NPV. Adopting B adds $445.50 more to the value of the firm
than does A.
Chapter 9
CF
$15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
PVIF13%,n
0.885
0.783
0.693
0.613
0.543
PV
$13,275
15,660
17,325
18,390
19,005
$83,655
239
240
Project B
$0 = $15,000 (PVIFA k%,5) $50,000
IRR = 15%
Calculator solution: 15.24%
(d)
Net Present Value Profile
50000
45000
40000
Net Present
Value ($)
35000
30000
NPV - A
25000
NPV - B
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
0
10
12
14
16
15.2%
Intersectionapproximately 14%
If cost of capital is above 14%, conflicting rankings occur.
The calculator solution is 13.87%.
(e) Both projects are acceptable. Both have positive NPVs and equivalent IRRs that are greater
than the cost of capital. Although Project B has a slightly higher IRR, the rates are very close.
Since Project A has a higher NPV, and also has the shortest payback, accept Project A.
Chapter 9
241
$2,200,000
(1,200,000)
480,000
(720,000)
$1,480,000
Book value = $0
$1,200,000 $0 = $1,200,000 income from sale of existing press
$1,200,000 income from sale (0.40) = $480,000
(b)
Year Revenues
1 $1,600,000
2
1,600,000
3
1,600,000
4
1,600,000
5
1,600,000
6
0
Net Profits
After Taxes
$216,000
57,600
229,200
321,600
321,600
66,000
Cash
Flow
$656,000
761,600
647,200
585,600
585,600
44,000
242
CF
$656,000
761,000
647,200
585,600
585,600
44,000
PVIF11%,n
0.901
0.812
0.731
0.659
0.593
0.535
PV
$591,056
618,419
473,103
385,910
347,261
23,540
$2,439,289
$1,200,000
150,000
$1,350,000
(185,000)
(79,600)
(264,600)
25,000
$1,110,400
Chapter 9
Net Profits
After Taxes
$91,200
57,600
57,600
24,000
0
0
Depreciation
$152,000
96,000
96,000
40,000
0
0
Year
$318,000
$60,800
$257,200
382,800
38,400
344,400
312,600
38,400
274,200
274,800
16,000
258,800
274,800
274,800
27,000
27,000
$200,000
(53,000)
Cash
Flow
$318,000
382,800
312,600
274,800
274,800
27,000
Cash
Flow
$60,800
38,400
38,400
16,000
0
0
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
$147,000
0
25,000
$172,000
243
244
(b)
Year
CF
PVIF9%,n
PV
$257,200
0.917
$235,852
344,400
0.842
289,985
274,200
0.772
211,682
258,800
0.708
183,230
274,800
0.650
178,620
172,000
0.650
111,800
Terminal value
$1,211,169
NPV = PV of cash inflows Initial investment
NPV = $1,211,169 $1,110,400
NPV = $100,769
Calculator solution: $100,900
$257,200 $344,400 $274,200 $258,800 $446,800
(c) $0 =
+
+
+
+
$1,110,400
(1 + IRR)1 (1 + IRR)2 (1 + IRR)3 (1 + IRR)4 (1 + IRR)5
IRR = 12.2%
Calculator solution: 12.24%
(d) Since the NPV > 0 and the IRR > cost of capital, the new machine should be purchased.
(e) 12.24%. The criterion is that the IRR must equal or exceed the cost of capital; therefore,
12.24% is the lowest acceptable IRR.
P9-23. LG 1, 6: Ethics Problem
Intermediate
Expenses are almost sure to increase for Gap. The stock price would almost surely decline in the
immediate future, as cash expenses rise relative to cash revenues. In the long run, Gap may be
able to attract and retain better employees (as does Chick-fil-A, interestingly enough, by being
closed on Sundays), new human rights and environmentally conscious customers, and new
investor demand from the burgeoning socially responsible investing mutual funds. This long-run
effect is not assured, and we are again reminded that its not merely shareholder wealth
maximization were afterbut maximizing shareholder wealth subject to ethical constraints.