Sustainable Development Commission Breakthroughs For The Twenty-First Century
Sustainable Development Commission Breakthroughs For The Twenty-First Century
1 Foreword
2 Finding Breakthroughs
6 The need for Breakthroughs
36 Making it happen
37 List of Breakthrough ideas contributors
39 References
Acknowledgements
We are also grateful to the following organisations for supporting the Breakthroughs
event: Ashden Trust, Co-operative Group, Nesta, WRAP, Natural England, Marks and
Spencer, Ecotricity, Wessex Water, Carbon Trust and Willmott Dixon.
Prepared by
Claire Monkhouse, Jonathon Porritt and Andrew Lee.
That phrase has become the watchword of governments long before ‘whatever it takes, for as long as it takes’ also
around the world when it comes to sorting out the implosion becomes the watchword of global climate diplomacy?
in capital markets. For the last eighteen months, they’ve And climate change, however big and daunting it may
been working together in unprecedented unity to try and be, is only one facet of the broader sustainable development
restore economic stability. agenda. It is now more than four years since the UK
Compare that, however, with governments’ combined Government published its second Sustainable Development
response to accelerating climate change, collapsing Strategy, ‘Securing the Future’. During that time there has
ecosystems, the Millennium Development Goals and so on undoubtedly been some progress. We have cleaner air.
– the sum of all those civilisation-threatening crises identified More of our waste is re-used and recycled. Crime rates are
by governments from the early 1990s onwards. Stumbling, falling, people are living longer and, until recently, we were
uninspired incrementalism would be a generous description. experiencing a period of steady economic growth and high
That may now be changing. President Obama has seized levels of employment.
hold of the climate change agenda, and has inspired people But on the whole, we have still not seen the kind of
all over the world with his plans for getting rid of nuclear transformation that is needed. Indeed, the most recent
weapons. Governments of many different persuasions are evidence tells us that levels of inequality in the UK have
completely re-thinking their strategies to help protect the not been reduced since 1997, which demonstrates just
rainforests. China is driving forward a number of ‘disruptive how far we have still to go in terms of creating a genuinely
innovation’ programmes on renewable energy and sustainable economy. We seem bogged down on so many
transportation that could astonish everyone. The UK’s Climate different fronts.
Change Act has become the first legislation in the world to That’s why, in 2008, the Sustainable Development
set legally-binding short, medium and long-term targets for Commission launched ‘Breakthroughs for the 21st Century’.
reducing greenhouse gases. We wanted to bring together a dynamic and hard-hitting
But setting targets, however ambitious they may be, is portfolio of ideas that could really inspire and motivate
not of itself a breakthrough. The increasing levels of R&D for policy-makers and others to set the UK much more decisively
sustainable technologies is not of itself a breakthrough. And on the path to becoming a sustainable society.
making sure that things are at least not getting worse is not, See what you think about these potential breakthroughs.
of itself, a breakthrough. We all know that things need to get If you’re excited by them, what can you do to help make
a very great deal better very quickly indeed. them a reality? They may not be the sum total of what’s
Views differ as to just how much time we’ve got to required, so we encourage everyone to come up with their
make those changes. On climate change, very little, say an own – and make them happen!
increasingly worrying number of very eminent scientists.
If that’s true, and if we pick up on Lord Stern’s advice to Jonathon Porritt
governments that up to 2% of annual GDP will need to be Chairman, Sustainable Development Commission
invested in a rapid transition to a low-carbon world, how
Finding Breakthroughs
We knew there were good ideas out there – compelling idea happen! Others build upon concepts about self-reliance,
propositions that, put into action, could really help make community and frugality which have served our nation
the UK more sustainable. So, last autumn, we invited well in the past – concepts which have renewed relevance
experts, practitioners and enthusiasts to share their thinking in an economic downturn and given the climate change
with us, and those breakthrough ideas started pouring in. imperative.
And because sustainable development has intergenerational We’ve presented the ideas grouped into three broad
equity at its core, we made a point of seeking the views of categories:
young people too (see page 4). • Sustainable lives: ideas which are symbolic of the ways
To put together a portfolio of the best and brightest, in which we as individuals can be directly enabled to
we’ve looked at every single one of the 285 submissions change our own lifestyles and work with others at a
we received from organisations and individuals across the community level
UK. As we sifted out those we felt were the strongest, we • Sustainable places: ideas which are iconic in terms of
were looking for ideas that could create some kind of shift in changing the built environment, our infrastructure and
the next three to five years – or at least make steps towards green spaces, in ways which could help reinforce and
a longer term change – as well as inspire others to make ‘lock in’ new and more beneficial ways of living
that change. • Sustainable economy: ideas which change the
Our selection meetings, involving Commissioners and marketplace, the signals about price and value, making
policy analysts from across the SDC, led to a shortlist of 40 more sustainable choices easier and more accessible.
ideas which we then took to a wider audience, to get more
feedback and see whether others shared our enthusiasm. Our selection represents just a few of the great ideas out
Over 200 commentaries helped us decide on the final there – the tip of a rather impressive iceberg. The process
package of ideas we wanted to present. we have been through to reach this point demonstrates the
The nineteen ‘Breakthrough Ideas’ set out on the sheer amount of creativity and innovation there is in the UK
following pages are spread across the spectrum of sustainable in response to the challenge of creating a more sustainable
development, with solutions ranging from policy change society. Most of the ideas we’ve picked are at an early stage
to grassroots action to technological innovation. They and will need a great deal more work in the form of research
encompass varying levels, from individuals, to communities, and development. This report, and the events that go with
cities, and things that need to be done at national or it, are simply ways of throwing the spotlight on innovative
international level. Indeed, many of the ideas are driven thinking and encouraging you and others reading this to help
from the grassroots, but require government to act as convert the thinking or demonstration projects into concrete
the enabler. initiatives. The real breakthroughs will come in the way
The ideas are not all completely new, and they are Government, business and other organisations nurture this
certainly not rocket science. Some have been around for talent and enable ideas like these to happen quickly and at
a while, but need to be mainstreamed or scaled up. The a transformative scale.
breakthrough is sometimes about simply making a good
working group
gh
en
W
e
Po
sin
illi
tS
SDC
rr
a nd B u
Commissi
n
y
ptio
olic
on
um
lP
n
ir
er
e
s ,S a r, L for
on on o ca
inable C
usta l and Regi W h it
ehall
Enhanced
Re-mediation From ‘Pre-pay’ Green Independent
Eco Zones/
and Carbon Fife Diet Food Revolution to ‘Pay as you Green Bonds Constitution Green Corps monitoring Kyoto2
Communities
Sequestration save’ Commission body
in Soils
285 ideas
submitted
40 ideas
short-listed
Testing
with wider
audience
Final selection
meeting
Lives 1 2 3 4 5 6 19
Breakthrough
7 8 9 10 11 12
ideas
Places
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Economy
A better UK for future generations – engaging young people
All these breakthrough ideas, wide-ranging as they are, have young people suggested to us were sometimes refreshingly
a common aim: a better future. So is this how today’s young new, and less constrained by preconceptions about what can
people see their world? What should a future UK look like to be achieved.
them, if it is to meet their needs and desires, and those of We spent a full day with the Children and Youth Board
succeeding generations? We wanted to know. We wanted to (CYB) – a group set up by the Department for Children,
hear their suggestions for how we get there – and whether they Schools and Families to provide a real sounding board for
see the main challenges of sustainability in the same way. its policies – and invited more views through a survey to
What we heard, as we hoped and expected, did the existing networks of We Are What We Do and the Youth
frequently echo what we were hearing in our other research. Parliament.
But when it came to creative ideas, the breakthroughs that This is what they told us...
‘rubbish politicians’ –
‘loss of confidence
Tackling climate Crime – rising Education in the establishment’
change and gun and knife - ‘ignorance of
increasing crime parents, children
renewable energy and teachers’
– ‘negative
effect of the
media on people’s
Teenage pregnancy perception of
Need for more Fairness for
and sex education things’
recycling everyone
We know we need to do much more to make the UK a truly and more and more people are eager to be a part of making
sustainable society – one that is prosperous, healthy, fair and that happen.
operates within environmental limits. The imperative to avoid On climate change alone, there are between 2000 and
really dangerous levels of climate change represents just one 4000 active community groups.2
of these limits, and responding to them in a way which is The rapidly growing Transition Towns movement, working
fair, equitable and economically sound is what sustainable on communities’ resilience to peak oil and climate change, is
development is all about. Compelling evidence on the state of one powerful example, and in this report we highlight South
the environment, the economy and social trends (see below) London’s ‘Project Dirt’, one of a growing number of active
underpins the increasing awareness amongst organisations web-based communities linking environmental projects
and individuals of the challenges that we face, and the need at local level to create more critical mass (see page 15).
for us to face these challenges head on. The interest and opportunity is there. So is the pressing
need – to find Breakthroughs, and make them happen!
‘We are today faced with a crisis of sustainability.’
Hilary Benn, Secretary of State for the Environment, 20091 ‘If I had to choose one word that best describes the
impetus for our journey to a low carbon economy,
Many of these challenges aren’t new – but we do now find it would be ‘resilience’. The creation of an economy,
ourselves in extraordinary times. Paradoxically, the economic ecology and society with greater resilience has many
crisis has opened up new political space. There’s a growing aspects, but the three which stand out are the role of
recognition that in response to global changes we need not technology; the importance of individual and collective
just more resilient economies, but more resilience at the behaviour change; and changes in culture, values and
individual and community level to meet external shocks. expectations.’
The mood of the day is that things need to change – Jan Bebbington, SDC Commissioner3
4
Religious/spiritual life 6%
The UK ranks 24th in a league
table of 29 European countries on
Money and financial situation 7%
child wellbeing, well below countries
of similar affluence. Only Romania,
Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Malta
do worse. The ranking looked at seven
different areas, including health,
education, children’s views of about
how they feel about themselves and
Partner/spouse their relationships11
A nice and family
place to live
5
relationships
8% 47% The UK has the highest rate of
childhood obesity in the EU.12
Health
1 2
Limited progress has been made Although the number of children in while two thirds are under five miles.14
on reducing income inequalities, low-income households decreased
and the gap between the richest and
poorest tenths is increasing.5
from 27% to 22% between 1997 and
2007, one in five children still live in 7 Despite the fall in crime since 1995,
two in three people believe crime
has increased in the last two years.15
poverty, and the UK is not on track to
meet its 2011 target for child poverty.6
1 2
Expected increases in population Despite improvements following is improving, the UK is below the
will create new and competing government initiatives, percentage needed to be in ‘favourable’
demands for land to be used for existing housing stock in the UK still or ‘unfavourable recovering’ condition’
housing, infrastructure and food requires massive energy efficiency by 2010, and is not on target to halt
production. improvements to meet climate change biodiversity loss by 2010.23
targets and to combat rising fuel
500
decrease in CO2 emissions (of around
8%) becomes a significant increase CO2 covered by Kyoto target
(18%) once emissions embedded in 400 (excluding aviation and shipping)
trade and travel are considered.26
300
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
‘Going local’ is only one aspect of the whole complex issue of sustainable food.
It’s significant, however, that a number of ideas submitted to the SDC for an
overall ’food revolution’, centred firmly on the re-localisation of food and
support for local producers.
This localisation provides the key to improved access to fresh seasonal produce,
reconnecting producers and consumers, reducing transport-related emissions
and increasing resource-efficient production. It also supports social interaction by
bringing people together to make more of public and private space.
We have chosen to showcase two practical initiatives. The first is based
on what’s happening in ‘Incredible Edible Todmorden’, West Yorkshire, and
encouraging other communities to follow their lead. The second idea is for a new
project to make use of under-used land for community gardening.
Incredible edible communities
1
SDC
‘Every community can be inspired to act more sustainably by
growing and consuming local food. Reconnecting food and
consumers and reconnecting people with the land is key.
The idea of a nationwide competition is all about stimulating
innovation and creating new possibilities, even in a time
of recession; any neighbourhood in any city can do it. It
allows for cross-fertilisation between different sectors, shows
people how to share, and encourages local authorities to
work with local community groups who are finding solutions
to local problems.’
sustainable lives
response to concerns about food prices, food miles and the
environment, is it more important to maximise access to
good, healthy and affordable food?
Britain has very rigid ideas about how land is used in the
private sphere. In America, community gardens mean literally
that. Here we grow our own food and flowers in our own
small spaces of land. This project is about changing the way
that land ownership and land use is viewed, using activity
around that land to develop social capital and networks.’
SDC
‘The shift that really needs to happen is not just conceptual,
but behavioural. Getting people actively involved will do
more than anything to enable them to realise the benefits
of pro-community gardening practice, to rethink the idea
of gardening collectively, and to see how decisions about
private space can affect the public realm.’
SDC
‘If we’re to be suitably ambitious about this whole issue –
how the environment contributes to young people’s well-
being, and how young people contribute to the well-being of
the environment – we should aim to make it a sixth objective
of the government’s Every Child Matters Framework. As a
minimum, structures and clear targets for outdoor experiences
need to be backed up by strong and consistent incentives.
Unless this is properly resourced, children’s services, schools
and other local partners can’t and won’t deliver.‘
Getting young people reconnected with the natural world What happens next
There’s a fair amount to build on, since across the UK
Dr Kate Rawles & Dr Chris Loynes, University of Cumbria there is significant work already underway and some
‘Young people need outdoor experiences – but a growing policies in place to promote children’s learning outside
number aren’t getting any. This project is about reversing the classroom. To move forward, we now need to get
their “nature deficit” – by ensuring that teaching and agreement on what level of outdoor experience of
learning in outdoor settings is built into the education nature becomes every child’s formal ‘entitlement’, to
system across the board. From early years to secondary be met as an integral part of early years and schools
level, children’s well-being is nurtured by bringing them provision. Teachers also need the commitment,
into frequent contact with the natural world, helping them confidence and competence to turn this into a regular
to develop the values, knowledge and understanding that feature of what they do. Identifying, promoting and
underpin sustainable lifestyles. We want more schools to rewarding exemplary practice would all help, but as a
focus on this – and to be assessed on how effectively they solid base there should be a specific focus on outdoor
deliver. Environmental organisations can be their natural experience in teacher training, standards for newly
allies – with informal education, youth activities and multi- qualified teachers, continuous professional development
agency services such as Children’s Centres all playing their programmes, and qualifications for early years and
part too.‘ youth workers. Then there’s the child safety dimension.
However confident we are that the benefits of outdoor
‘If we want children to flourish, to become truly experience outweigh the attendant risks, we’ll have to
empowered, then let us allow them to love the earth find ways to bring even the most cautious of teachers,
before we ask them to save it.’ parents and governors onside.
David Sobel, US writer and pioneer of place-based education
Schools are
the horizons of PSHE (Personal, Social, Health and Economic
‘ education) into something that makes a coherent package
of the full range of factors driving happiness and wellbeing.
Though the boundaries are already wide (eg identity, health,
society’s best hope risk, relationships and diversity), the well-documented links
between wellbeing and environmental factors (traffic, litter,
for promoting
green space, nature, noise etc.) are not included. So, we
believe this area of learning should be renamed Personal,
happier
Social, Economic and Environmental education (PSEE) or,
sustainable lives
and collective action
5
SDC
Whilst there are literally thousands of local groups and
organisations already taking action on sustainability, a new
generation of networking initiatives is emerging. Some have
taken their inspiration from online movements such as Moveon.
org, the progressive politics movement in the US which was one
of the springboards for the Obama campaign. There is a growing
mood for change, and these new networks have the potential
to link activists groups and projects together, creating critical
mass and hence a much more powerful catalyst for change.
We’ve been talking to a number of these such as Green Voice30,
Ecomotion31, 38 Degrees32, Climate Outreach and Information
Network33, Transition Towns Network34, Rural Community Carbon
Network35, Low Carbon Community Network36 and Project Dirt37.
The latter, in South London, is one very inspiring local version
which has the potential to be scaled up.
Contact
[email protected]
www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/engagement.html
Project Dirt
Mark Shearer & Nick Gardner and receives 150+ visits a day. It is looking to expand across
With a plethora of community-led projects working towards the city, then nationwide.
environmental improvement, but not linking up with each Using Project Dirt, members can quickly discover what is
other, it can feel as if the whole is less than the sum of going on in any given field. Connecting them with others
the parts. Project Dirt aims to help this often fragmented with similar or complementary skills or experience allows
and uncoordinated movement get better at sharing best them to share best practice. The project is currently talking
practice. Put simply, it makes information readily accessible to several local authorities and businesses about using its
to everyone who wants to know. The best sources of this website to distribute grants to environmental groups. But
information are the people involved in current and real the real value of Project Dirt is its ability to motivate people
life projects, so Project Dirt’s website provides a neutral to become committed and active locally, by showing them
platform for them to set up and manage what they’re all the activity going on all around them.
doing within the context of a wider green community. The
website currently covers South London, has 900+ members [email protected] www.projectdirt.com
Short
te
rm
SDC
‘This proposal does not undermine representative
rm
Mediu
m
te democracy, but rather strengthens it by generating a sense
of collective responsibility on issues that can’t be solved by
m
ter government alone. Its status will ensure it has real clout, and
Long its reach will go beyond the policy community, via the media
and internet, to build national awareness and interest in the
topics under investigation.’
ven
kA within their community. A radical programme, it will
Par
require a dedicated local presence answerable to the local
community and available to “hand hold” occupants through
the transformation.‘
Po
SDC
rr it
e
nu
Ave
riv
Gro
to occupants for many years, plus crucial carbon emissions
Combating fuel poverty, health problems and emissions reductions for the UK. Low Carbon Zones will be a cost
by bringing poor-quality housing up to highest energy effective way of achieving this, thanks to the way the work
efficiency standards can be organised to ensure economies of scale. And the
economy as a whole will benefit from the stimulus to the
Dr Brenda Boardman, Lower Carbon Futures, Oxford building industry through local jobs and training.’
University Centre for the Environment
‘This project proposes Low Carbon Zones – energy action What happens next
programmes in specially designated areas within every local This idea builds on and scales up existing programmes,
authority. In these zones, all homes will be brought up to the delivering more radical improvements, more rapidly.
best efficiency standard by 2012 – earning at least a B rating It will play a key role in ensuring that the Government
on the Energy Performance Certificate. Improvements will go achieves its legal obligation to end fuel poverty by
beyond the familiar territory of loft lagging and filling cavity 2016. Responsibility is shared between central and local
walls to embrace techniques such as solid wall insulation and government, as part of the move towards devolution
zero carbon technologies (such as solar water heating, solar and area-based programmes for energy efficiency.
photovoltaic electricity generation, and community-scale
combined heat and power).
Each Local Authority can determine the size and shape of
its own Zone, provided it contains at least 50% of all the fuel Contact
poor households within that Authority’s jurisdiction. People [email protected]
in fuel poverty won’t have to pay, because work on their www.eci.ox.ac.uk
homes will be funded out of income tax. Other households
will be encouraged to join in too, subsidised through existing
This idea connects benefits for the local economy with future
sustainable places
proofing Greater Manchester’s existing building stock, three
quarters of which will still be in use in 2050. Not only will
it cut carbon emissions, energy use, household bills and
business operating costs, it will create entry level jobs and
a skills ladder in the low carbon technologies and services
sector, and business opportunities all along the supply chain,
developing and delivering product and services innovations.
The model is designed to be replicable across other cities.
The proposal for creating this company is targeted at
businesses who see tackling climate change as a core
concern. The partnership approach builds on initiatives such
as “Manchester is My Planet” and the “triple helix” of strong
public sector leadership, a vibrant, innovative and tuned in
academic community, and a track record of successful supply
chain intervention to deliver jobs and skills.’
SDC
‘Despite significant activity in carbon reduction at a national
level, the evidence is that current efforts aren’t working
anything like fast enough. A viable and attractive model to
Future-proofing Manchester’s building stock while stimulate investment in sustainable infrastructure in existing
providing employment, skills and long-term investment communities is still urgently needed. Solutions tailored to
opportunities specific areas are likely to be able to go further and deliver
greater carbon reductions whilst bringing a host of benefits
Mike Reardon, Association of Greater Manchester Authorities to local communities.’
‘The vast majority of Greater Manchester’s homes and
businesses still need converting to much higher energy What happens next
efficiency standards, and low- and zero-carbon heat and power. The investment model development is under way. The
So this breakthrough idea involves setting up a company where relevant government departments – DECC, CLG and
the local authorities partner with the private sector to bring BERR – may have to be persuaded of the advantages
together the necessary finance and expertise, and stimulate the of developing this integrated approach. Issues around
development of innovative products and services. grid connection and energy price points will need to
The company offers residents and businesses a be resolved via close partnership with the utilities and
straightforward choice of off-the-shelf low carbon retrofit the regulators. Greater Manchester also has plans for a
packages appropriate to local circumstances, delivered by Climate Change Agency.
approved agents and backed by financing deals to cover the For the business model to work, it needs to
up-front cost. The repayments would be made over time generate a secure revenue flow, and to be able
(perhaps via a Pay As You Save mechanism linked to the to access long-term affordable financing and new
property’s energy bill – see page 20). Risk would be spread innovative financing schemes. Rolling it out will rely
by bundling large numbers of upgraded home projects on mainstreaming successful pilot projects, finding and
together, making up-front financing an attractive proposition enlisting visionary local leaders, and strengthening
for long-term investors such as pension funds. social business models. Developing the skills base
The company’s activities would also extend to owning is essential.
and operating low- and zero-carbon energy generation at
community scale – bringing in revenue from the sale of
heat and power to local residents and businesses (perhaps
including new-build developments), and for excess electricity Contact
delivered into the grid. At its best, it would localise energy [email protected]
supply as well as reducing demand for energy and looking at
the total carbon footprint of our wider lifestyles.
£ SDC
Billing process ‘Household energy use currently accounts for over a quarter of
(existing: the UK’s carbon emissions. To achieve a breakthrough in carbon
Energy,
Water, Council
Ongoing activity reduction, as the Government acknowledges, emissions from
tax etc.) One time activity buildings need to be down to almost zero by 2050. And energy
inefficient homes are a contributory cause not only of climate
change, but also of fuel poverty – a misery for growing numbers
of people.
Financing home energy efficiency measures through future Sadly, many are still being left cold by the existing case
savings on energy bills for energy efficiency. The upfront costs barrier is compounded
when people aren’t sure of remaining in their homes long
David Adams, Knauf Insulation enough to recoup their investment, or (for landlords rather than
‘This is a smart way of financing energy efficiency measures owner-occupiers) when they aren’t the ones who’ll be getting
in people’s homes, which gets round their reluctance – or the energy cost saving. But both these conundrums are neatly
inability – to pay up front for future benefits. The project builds unlocked by this idea of linking loans for energy efficiency
upon the concept of third party financing the upfront costs works to the property rather than its owner. As outlined in
repaid via a charge on the property rather than the individual. SDC’s Sustainable New Deal, no climate change strategy will
This will enable the costs to be spread over a sufficient period succeed without a comprehensive upgrading of the existing
so that repayments are less than energy cost savings, so the housing stock.’
householder sees a net financial benefit every time the bill
arrives – whether they own the place, rent it, or take it on What happens next
with this arrangement already up and running. To gain customer confidence and incentivise installers, an
The project has developed this basic idea into a accreditation and quality assessment scheme needs to be
comprehensive policy package providing further incentives linked to the financial package. After all, everything relies
by relating stamp duty and/or council tax to home energy on achieving the promised energy savings. And, although
performance and guaranteeing quality through an integrated the initial financing concept is fairly easy to grasp, its
accreditation scheme. details need to be accessible to potential customers and
policy makers. In any event, the role of local – and central
– government will be key. Encouragingly, Ed Miliband,
The level of savings will be dependent on fuel costs. the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change,
Taking a conservative estimate* applying a basket of has already given vocal support to the Pay as you Save
measures worth £8,600 to a 3 bed semi would deliver concept, which also features in Conservative Party’s Low
net average savings of £50 per year over a 25 year loan Carbon Economy policy paper.
period, rising to £900 per year thereafter. If fuel prices
rise at 4% per year, this rises to over £200 per year. This
is on top of improving the Energy Performance Certificate
rating from E to C, and saving 3 tonnes of CO2 per year. Contact
*With a 30% reduction on Q4 2008 prices, followed by a 5% increase per [email protected]
year, and taking 9 years to return to 2008 prices
sustainable places
independent communities at the local scale. At present, by
contrast, huge quantities of biomass “waste” generated by
farms, forestry and in rural regions (England alone currently
produces over 272 million tonnes a year) is often simply
burned or just allowed to biodegrade, emitting methane and
nitrous oxide as well as carbon dioxide.’
Water vapour
and C02
Absorbs C02 SDC
and water vapour
Heat ‘Sustainable energy generation and food production must
Electricity be at the core of a sustainable society, and over the coming
centuries we will need to enhance natural carbon sinks
Woodchip
Local, to return CO2 concentrations to pre-industrial levels. This
Gasifier building
sustainable approach addresses both these sustainability issues – the
forestry
Wood chips future equilibrium, and the legacy problem. It is not a Global
panacea – there will be parts of the world where it may not
be an appropriate technology. But for the UK as a whole, it
has been estimated that biochar could sequester as much as
about 10% of current annual carbon emissions. Furthermore,
once the infrastructure is in place, it will generate long-term
benefits with minimal further investment.‘
Providing renewable heat, improving soil quality and
creating carbon sinks with biochar What happens next
Robust environmental lifecycle impact assessments will
Professor Tim Lenton & Dr. Zoe Wallage, University of be a prerequisite before putting the biochar concept
East Anglia into practice at scale. UK waste legislation will need
‘The biochar process converts part of our waste stream into to be revised, to recognise biochar as a co-product
a form of carbon which can be locked back into the soil rather than a by-product of the bio-energy process, in
– a “negative emissions” system which has the potential order to prevent restrictions on burying it. Government
to become widespread across the UK. It is based on the innovation and support will need to be combined
burning of biomass waste in a modern process akin to with proper public engagement. With relatively little
ancient charcoal-making. The biomass goes into a pyrolysing media attention so far, biochar is currently rather the
energy-and-charcoal generator, which drives a local heating poor relation amongst other larger-scale approaches to
system, producing a useful synthesis of gas and bio-oil, Carbon Capture and Storage.
and converting the remaining half of the carbon into
biochar. Once in the soil, if properly managed, this carbon
is permanently removed from the atmosphere. Adding
“biochar” to agricultural soil has many other benefits: it can Contact
improve the soil structure and enhance its nutrient and water [email protected], School of Environmental Sciences.
retention ability, so potentially you get better crops with http://researchpages.net/people/tim-lenton/
less fertiliser, less need for irrigation and fewer problems of
eutrophication of streams and rivers. [email protected], Low Carbon Innovation Centre.
This idea combines a form of Carbon Capture and Storage www.uea.ac.uk/lcic
with the simultaneous recycling of waste, the production of
alternative and renewable fuel sources, the enhancement of
TREATMENT half the illnesses treated by the NHS are preventable.40 This is
E N TIO N
ase to
sustainable places
momentum of change will create a virtuous circle. The more
people do it, the greater the awareness of cycling and its
benefits – and the safer it becomes. In London, where cycling
60% of all
has almost doubled in the last 10 years, cyclist casualties
‘ have actually fallen by one third.‘
SDC
car journeys ‘This isn’t a novel idea – but it’s one whose time has come. At
the very least, we should aim to double cycling levels within
10 years. The bicycle is the most efficient and environmentally
5 miles
routines is one of the best ways of staying healthy and
avoiding obesity. Just as important are the social spin-offs,
especially for the young. The young people that we spoke to
really wanted to see a breakthrough on cycling. Instead of
in length’ unsustainable car dependence, we look forward to a world in
which it’s taken for granted that our children can get around
cheaply and independently – by bike.
Look at countries where cycling is more common, and
you find much higher levels of child well-being. It’s not
Transforming our roads and giving people the confidence
only the cyclists who benefit. Less car use means less traffic
and incentive to cycle
congestion and better road safety for all. And cycle-friendly
neighbourhoods allow more scope for play and social
Chris Peck, CTC – the national cyclists’ organisation
interaction, encouraging better personal behaviour and even
‘A big push to promote cycling could make the bike
cutting crime.’
the normal choice for journeys up to five miles. The top
priority is overcoming the risks that put people off. That
means redesigning street layouts with cyclists in mind. What happens next
It means curbing traffic speed, reducing the volume of Improvements in infrastructure and street design, and
traffic, and investing in high quality cycle lanes or paths the extension of 20mph speed limits to cover most
on the busiest roads. It means providing every child – and urban neighbourhoods, should be backed up by better
all interested adults – with the training to ensure they can enforcement of traffic law, protecting vulnerable road users
cycle both safely and well. And, going beyond safety issues, from injury or intimidation – and by one to one advice on
promotional campaigns, journey planning advice, cycle-to- travel planning for people at critical times such as moving
work schemes, incentives and facilities for locking up bikes house or leaving school or university. Pro-cycling initiatives
and showering on arrival should encourage everyone to and cycle training need more funding and support from
seriously consider making cycling a regular part of their life. local authorities, schools and employers. In much of the
Bikes are best in the 1-5 mile range where cars are at UK, funding for cycling averages £1 or less per person per
their worst. Yet these short trips currently account for 60% year. Best practice might cost at least five times that, but
of all UK car journeys. Every trip made by bike instead will would be money well spent, with studies415suggesting that
cut emissions of greenhouse gases, particulates and other each additional cyclist boosts the economy by between
pollutants. Switching half of them would save up to 5 £300 and £600 per year in environmental, health and
million tonnes of CO2 a year, which is around 4% of domestic social benefits.
transport emissions.
This is a quality of life issue too. People will be healthier,
happier and better off if they cycle more. Many would
love to, but just don’t feel it’s safe. Half the children in the Contact
UK would like to cycle to school, surveys say, yet only 2% [email protected]
actually do. By creating a more cycling-friendly environment, www.ctc.org.uk
and helping them minimise the risks, we’ll get more of
We need to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases globally Trade scheme in the US, and other countries are starting
by at least 80% by 2050. And the developed countries need to get to grips with what this all means. But ETS permits
to make cuts of at least 30% by 2020. An unprecedented to emit CO2 are trading at around €10 a tonne these days.
scientific consensus has got us this far. But the politics of That’s woefully inadequate. US scientist Jim Hansen reckons
tackling climate change still lags far behind the science. it will take $250 a tonne to get emissions down by 80%. At
The frameworks at the heart of carbon management at a present rates of progress, the concentration of greenhouse
global level, such as Kyoto and the EU Emissions Trading gases in the atmosphere will be through the 450ppm barrier
Scheme (EU ETS), have struggled to make much of an impact (the upper limit if we are to have a decent chance of staying
on emissions not because they were flawed ideas, but below the all-important 2°C average temperature increase)
because they were undermined by fundamental political before we get anywhere near Stern’s ‘realistic price’.
tensions between the US, EU and developing countries. This kind of realism (not pessimism!) is persuading more
With Copenhagen approaching, and both the Obama and more people that we’ve got to come up with something
administration and China gearing up, a new international much faster, smarter and fairer than the current Kyoto
settlement on climate change looks possible for 2010. It is regime. And some of the brightest thinking on how to tackle
therefore a good time to look again at ways of capping and that challenge is going on right here in the UK.
allocating carbon emissions. Here we present three Breakthroughs: two are new ideas
What’s the single most important thing we can do to for a much tougher global regime for allocating and driving
correct that science-into-policy deficit? Lord Stern was clear down carbon emissions. Their approaches differ, but both
on this: ‘get a realistic price on a tonne of CO2 just as fast believe that interventions have to be upstream (at the
as possible.’ That won’t be enough on its own, but it’s the point where carbon-based fuels enter the economy), and
baseline without which everything else is at risk. global (unlike the Kyoto Protocol). And both, significantly,
So how near are we to getting a ‘realistic price’? are upbeat – rooted in the idea of getting everyone to
Substantial volumes of carbon are traded though the EU focus on benefits and opportunities. The third idea takes
ETS and under the Kyoto Protocol’s flexibility mechanisms. a very different and quite distinct approach – placing the
President Obama is vigorously pushing a similar Cap-and- responsibility for managing carbon with the individual.
25
Cap and share
13
producers.
CAPPED ALLOCATION
OF GLOBAL CO2 PERMITS
Reducing the number of permits ensures a permanent
reduction in fossil fuel supply. This forces energy suppliers to
diversify, for example into renewables, or into new business
Pe
rm
Permits
Permits
Permits
SDC
Economic behaviour
Higher price of energy
‘The UK has the opportunity to lead the way on personal
carbon budgeting. It’s an idea with great potential to
reduce carbon emissions over the long term, by stimulating
Personal Carbon Budgets
Carbon perception Energy transparent, demonstrably fair, and socially just. Much of the
Demand
Awareness of personal
Reduction
early thinking has been done in this country, and there is a
carbon footprint
clear fit with our national budgeting approach, as laid out in
the Climate Change Act. This particular idea is good because
it starts with personal travel and energy, rather than trying to
Social norms do everything all at once.’
New attitudes to
personal impacts on
climate change
What happens next
Personal carbon budgets are currently at the concept
stage – developed in various forms over the last
Individuals and communities taking responsibility for
ten years, but with details still to be worked out.
reducing emission of CO2 through personal carbon budgets
Turning this essentially simple idea into a firm policy
proposal won’t be easy. It will require leadership and
Nick Eyre, Environmental Change Institute, University
ownership by the Government and policy community,
of Oxford
and a commitment to research, develop and test such
‘Reducing emissions of CO2 is not just a matter for government
crucial aspects as IT systems, enforcement procedures,
and business. The idea behind personal carbon budgets is to
and wider income distribution effects. The ultimate
make it relevant to the individual level. Currently, in “cap and
success of a fully-fledged scheme will depend hugely
trade” schemes such as the EU Emissions Trading Scheme,
on the effective management of its costs and sheer
energy use by companies is the subject of carbon emission
organisational complexity, covering millions of people’s
quotas. In the same way, each of us could be given direct
individual transactions. It will also depend, of course, on
accountability for our own household and transport energy
public reaction. Knowledge of personal carbon footprints
use. The fairest way of doing it would be for everyone to
is currently very limited, and, whatever they say in
be allocated an equal-sized annual allowance. As this “cap”
focus groups and opinion polls, it’s still difficult to gauge
reduces progressively year-on-year, it helps drive down the
how people will actually respond to living with personal
UK’s overall carbon emissions – about half of which come from
carbon budgets.
personal energy use.
A personal carbon budget will quite literally “bring home”
the whole concept of cutting emissions. Each individual will
have clear rights and responsibilities, and new motivation to Contact
live a low carbon life. Those who manage to live within their [email protected]
budget in a given year will have some spare quota to sell. www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/pct.php
Those who don’t will have to buy from the scheme to cover
their excess. People will think very differently about climate
£ Loan Investment
INVESTORS LOW
BOND AND CARBON
GOVERNMENT
HOLDERS HOUSEHOLDERS PROJECTS
£ + dividends Repaid loan + interest Savings + profits
Financing the transition to a low-carbon economy through downturn: they create assets with secure and distinct future
individual investments revenue streams. What’s more, they will work to limit the
risk of the investment they finance. Most of the uncertainty
Ingrid Holmes and James Cameron, Climate Change Capital about future revenues from carbon-cutting is uncertainty
‘Green Bonds are designed to raise capital for energy about future policy – and if government is guaranteeing the
efficiency projects, and low or zero carbon energy bond coupon, then it is much more likely to provide policies
generation. They’ll be issued by the Government for sale that give business the certainty it needs. Future governments
through the usual bond market routes. Funds raised through are, in effect, locked in.’
the bond could be managed by a new government-backed
Green Investment Bank, in which case the Bank would co- SDC
invest alongside the private sector. Alternatively, existing ‘Just as “Tell Sid” and the other public share issue campaigns
banks would be allowed to bid for capital to invest in of the 1980s helped convert ordinary citizens to participating
suitable projects. Green Bonds should be an attractive in the privatisation of services, Green Bonds could engage
proposition, with returns linked to revenues from the the public in the process of tackling climate change. Since the
investments, but with the Government acting as guarantor. projects they put their money into will also be helping them
One version, sold to institutions and likely to raise the bulk (and other people) save energy and money, they’ll have a
of the capital, will have a maturity of at least 15 years and direct positive stake as both investors and consumers.’
(probably) a fixed interest rate. The “retail” version for
individual investors will have a shorter timeframe of around
What happens next
five years, and pay interest in line with current market rates.
The aim is to get Green Bonds into the 2011 budget.
It helps finance the move to a low carbon economy – and
There will be quiet lobbying over the course of the next
thus reduce the chances of catastrophic climate change.
year, and a more public campaign starting in spring
The investment needed to meet the UK’s carbon-cutting
2010 involving a coalition of prominent organisations
commitments runs into hundreds of billions of pounds. The
and individuals. It will need to overcome the potential
private sector is very unlikely to be able to provide all of
reluctance of the Treasury to ring-fence the proceeds,
this, since the financial crisis has reduced the amount of debt
and any fears that it might cannibalise traditional
capital available, and the current policy landscape still leaves
government bond (gilt) issues.
so many uncertainties. However, government cannot afford
to fill the gap out of general taxation and borrowing: it is
already hitting the limits, with spending cuts predicted for
future years. Green Bonds are a way of squaring this circle. Contact
There’s some good evidence that they’ll attract [email protected]
institutional investors, even those who don’t want to [email protected]
buy any more ordinary government bonds. This is partly www.climatechangecapital.com
because they are not there simply to fill a gap caused by the
SDC
‘This initiative addresses both our economic crisis and our
urgent need to tackle climate change. The general public is
aware and watching the action on both fronts, with a keen eye
on the evolution of the financial industry. A dramatic change in
the Royal Bank of Scotland, such as this idea proposes, might
create a multiplier effect as it opens up more opportunities. It
could also serve as the government backing to support Green
Bonds (see page 30), and provide a pivotal opportunity for local
investment to help stimulate a truly sustainable labour market
(see page 32). At the micro-level, local RBS branch investments
Using the public stake in the Royal Bank of Scotland to could fund the insulation of individuals’ homes, or provide loans
create a bank to support the transition to a sustainable, for low-carbon community initiatives, such as a community-
low-carbon economy owned wind turbine.’
SDC
‘It is vital that the UK’s ambitious goals for tackling climate
change are matched by our seriousness about restructuring
the economy. This breakthrough helps respond to the
recession by creating jobs which can bring a sense of pride
to everyone. Meaningful paid work has an enormously
positive impact on health and well-being. It affects not just
individual workers, but their whole families and their local
Shaping jobs and skills around the needs of a sustainable, communities. The legacy of improved self-esteem will be
low-carbon community seen not just in this generation but the next one too.’
Stimulating Innovation
The Big Green Challenge
from NESTA (the National
Endowment for Science,
Technology and the Arts),
is a two-year project with
a £1 million prize fund.
Launched in October 2007,
it encourages people to work
together in their communities
on cutting their CO2 emissions
in innovative ways which can be sustained and replicated
more widely. This year is about putting ten Finalist
approaches into practice, with NESTA providing advice
and £20,000 in funding for each project. Winners will be
announced in early 2010. The Challenge is one of several
experimental, high-impact projects developed by NESTA
as it builds a body of evidence on encouraging, supporting
and stimulating innovation around the UK.
SDC
Using algae to capture industrial carbon and sequester it
‘There’s some classic sustainability thinking at the core of
through agricultural engineering
this idea: never stop looking for opportunities within your
problems. It also avoids the intergenerational equity issues
Peter Head, Arup
which must arise with any process involving perpetual waste
‘This breakthrough proposes a positive solution to one of
storage, even of CO2. And growing algae in bioreactors does
the world’s most pressing energy problems: dealing with
not raise the same “land take” problems as projects for vast
the CO2 given off by coal-fired power stations (and other
algal lagoons to sequester carbon.’
industrial burning of fossil fuels). The idea is to use fast-
growing algae to mop it up in situ, once it has been captured
within the pre- or post-combustion process. Rather than What happens next
piping or transporting it to underground sites for indefinite A fully funded and rapid research and development
storage, as proposed by most advocates of Carbon Capture programme will be needed to move the concept
and Storage (CCS), CO2 is passed through a collection of from small-scale testing into practice at large scale.
bioreactors in which light, nutrients and seawater encourage There’s also work to be done on how whole city waste
different types of algae to grow quickly and absorb the management systems can best be integrated – and on
carbon. The algae could be used to produce a range of using power station fuel supply lines to bring compost
products, including oils, pharmaceuticals and foodstuffs. The out from the digesters too. The roll-out will be a great
residual biomass after extraction can be put together with challenge for the process development and construction
organic waste collected and brought in from local cities, to industries. Government and business, working together,
feed on-site anaerobic digesters that produce both methane must show leadership, ownership and commitment to
and compost. Nutrients, C02 and water from the digesters attract investment and build technological capability.
are recycled in the process. The oxygen (and in some cases And, obviously, government must ensure that new rules
hydrogen) which this releases could have commercial uses. and regulations on carbon capture embrace these bio-
This innovative approach simultaneously helps tackle sequestration alternative approaches.
both climate change and declining food production. This
idea first germinated in efforts to combine Arup’s work on
carbon capture with its research into food technologies for the
Dongtan eco-city project and has been further developed with Contact
the UK Centre for Process Innovation (CPI). The “short carbon [email protected]
cycle” goes from fossil fuel emissions via algal biomass to [email protected]
biofuel and plant-growth-promoting compost.
There’s little point in having great ideas if nothing changes from when an idea is first mooted to it becoming a reality.
as a result. That’s why we went back and challenged the Given the scale and speed of transformation needed in our
champions of the selected ideas to think about what it would society, the time traditionally taken between the genesis
take to turn them into reality. of an idea and its deployment at scale must be radically
As you’ve seen, they identified a varying range of ‘needs’. shortened. As a nation, we have to get better at this.
There’s no one set path or magic recipe: mainstreaming each This project has identified something else, too, that
breakthrough will have different determining conditions gives food for thought; there is no one space, or central
and require a particular set of barriers to be overcome. But ‘hub’, where good ideas are coming together to be shared
there are common themes – and what they told us mirrored and embraced.
our own research on what makes breakthroughs happen46. One thing is certain, though. It’s time to get serious
Financing looms large. So does leadership, ownership and about implementation. We need to pin down what steps
commitment. Working in partnership is frequently cited too. are needed to progress these ideas. We want to secure
For some of the showcased ideas, the ones at an early commitment for taking those crucial steps – as well as to
stage, we see a need for further research – and backing identify where the UK can make simple (and not so simple)
to get it done. Others, already more advanced, are now wins, to enable and support more innovative thinking for
at the stage where they need to build critical mass, get the future.
more people on board, and be supported and reinforced by As for the SDC, as the Government’s independent advisor,
changes in policy. we will be seeking out opportunities for progressing these
The solutions aren’t always proven. New technologies are ideas through our own work, and through the advice we give
always on the horizon. But there’s a powerful sense that it to government departments across the UK, and will continue
can’t be right for government to wait until such time as all to promote the urgent need for breakthrough thinking in
the answers might be in. Too often there is a long lag period the UK.
Development Body of Policy levers: Policy levers: Skills and Awareness: Partnerships:
of idea support Some significant Changes in training: Greater recognition Connecting the
policies already education policy Teacher training, of the value of research & policy
in place standards, interaction with communities;
continued nature; overcoming agreement
professional perceived risks of formal
development ‘entitlement’
David Adams (KnaufInsulation) Kath Dalmeny (Sustain: the alliance for Sue Holden (Woodland Trust)
Benjamin Agbasi better food and farming) Rob Holdway (Giraffe Innovation Limited)
Anthony Alexander Ian Davenport (NATS Ltd) Ingrid Holmes/James Cameron (Climate
Kathryn Alford Maurice Davies Change Capital)
Steve Anstice (Environmental Strategies Ltd) Marc DeBlois Helen Holroyd (Supreme Master Television)
John Arnell John Dembovskis (Aequalitas Ltd) William Houstoun (Society for the
Prof Andrew Dobson (Keele University) Environment)
Nick Bardsley
Mike Duckett (Royal Brompton Hospital) Andrew Howes
John Barry
Chris Dunabin Dave Hughes (Environment Agency)
Malcolm Barton
Peter Duncan (Gale production/Scouts) David Hughes (BERR)
Paul Baruya
Samuel During (Project & Development Nigel Hughes (Green Light Trust)
Sandra Bayes
Consultants (PDC) Ltd) Hamish Ironside
Seb Beloe (Henderson Global Investors)
Joyce Edmond-Smith Kirsty Ivanoski (Local Government
Sheila Berridge
William Edrich (Kirklees Energy Services) Association)
Erik Bichard (Salford University)
Pete Eggleston (The Green Party) Andrew Jeffrey (South Yorkshire Health
Mia Bird Authority)
Paul Ekins (Kings College London/Green
Richard Blundel (BRESE, Brunel University) Kate Jeffreys (Geckoella Environmental
Fiscal Commission)
Brenda Boardman (Lower Carbon Futures, Consultants PVT Ltd)
David Elliott (Open University)
Environmental Change Institute, University Chris Jofeh (Arup)
of Oxford) Phil Evans
Ian Jones (Cornwall Centre for Volunteers)
Richard Bond Prof Stephen Evans (Cranfield University)
Peter Jones
Gregory Borne (South West Life-Long Nick Eyre (Environmental Change Institute,
University of Oxford) Tony Juniper
Learning Network)
Stephen Farrant Peter Karran (Fujitsu Services)
Phillip Bratby
Mark Felton (Natural England) Tim Kasser ( Knox College)
Michael Bright
Ann Finlayson (SEEd, SDC Commissioner) Duncan Kay (SDC)
Alan Brown (Linlithgow Climate Challenge)
Sue Flack (MRC McLean Hazel) James Kelly
Keith Budden (Be Birmingham
Environmental Partnership) Erica Flint Mary Kelly
Carlos Burgos (Pedro Achata Trust) Julie Foley (Environment Agency) Irene Kempton (Armagh City and District
Council)
Nick Byrne Nick Gardner (Project Dirt)
Neil Kermode (European Marine Energy
John Canton (Institution of Civil Engineers Christina Garidi
Centre)
East of England) Steve Garrett (Riverside Community Market
Prof Julia King (Aston University)
Jon Cape (Renew) Association)
Michele Kingston
Steve Carney (Origin Energy CIC) Neil Gavin (University of Liverpool)
Ellie Kivinen
Ian Cheshire (Kingfisher) Jetske Germing (PLANED)
Prof Richard Layard (LSE)
Kate Clifford (The Rural College) Gordon Gibson
Richard Leafe (Lake District National Park
Prof Mick Common (David Livingstone Peter Glass
Authority)
Centre for Sustainability, University of Debbie Gosman
Strathclyde) Tim Lenton (University of East Anglia)
Liz Gray (Sheffield Community Renewables)
Jill Cooper Derek Likorish (Lickorish Consulting)
James Greyson (Blindspot)
Anna Coote (NEF, SDC Commissioner) Anita Longley (RWE npower)
Martin Harper (RSPB)
Lindsey Colbourne (SDC Commissioner) Maria-Pilar Machancoses (Centro)
Tony Hawkhead/Graham Duxbury
Jon Cracknell (Environmental Funders David Mackie
(Groundwork UK)
Network) Ian Marchant (Scottish and Southern
Rebecca Hawkins (CESHI Ltd)
Vic Crisp Energy)
Heather Haydock (AEA)
Louise Crompton/Anne-Marie Shields (SDC) James Marriott (PLATFORM)
Peter Head (Arup)
Liz Crosbie (Strategic Environmental Dr Stephen Martin/Maureen Martin
Richard Heathcote
Consulting Ltd) Guy Martin
Mayer Hillman (Policy Studies Institute)
Andrew Curry Richard Masson
Prof John Hills (Centre for Analysis of Social
Donald Curtis Catherine Max (Trustee, Equinoxcare)
Exclusion, London School of Economics)
Ed Mayo (Consumer Focus) John Robottom Pam Warhurst/Fred Hunt (Incredible Edible
Todmorden)
AJ McConville (SDC) Jane Rochelle (Connaught Partnerships)
Peter Waugh
Peter McManners Chris Rose (Campaign Strategy Ltd)
Debby Weller
Bryan Metcalfe (TANDBERG) William Ross (Linlithgow Climate Change)
Norman Wheatley
Clive Mitchell Chris Rowlands
Debbie Whitaker (Standard Chartered
Alice Moncaster Patricia Sanderson
Bank)
Alan Moore (Renewables Advisory Board) Dr Phyllis SantaMaria (Microfinance without
Mark Whitby (Ramboll Whitbybird)
David Morris Borders)
William White
Roger Moses Rachel Sargeant
Caroline Wickham-Jones
Stan Mowat Philip Sargent
Dr Christopher Wiliams (University of
John Nielsen Rupa Sarkar
Glasgow)
Nick Nielsen (Envision) Jamie Saunders
Dr Will Williams (Natural Economy
Jo Nurse (Department of Health) Graham Scott Northwest)
Prof. Avner Offer (University of Oxford) Charles Seaford Gage Williams (Renewable Energy Office
Helen Ogilvy Andy Seeney for Cornwall)
Jennifer Otoadese Mike Small (Centre for Stewardship) Prof John Wood (Goldsmiths University of
Adrian Smith (SPRU) London)
Gary Pass (Basker Leitch)
Pam Smith (IGD) Tom Wood
Ken Peattie (BRASS, Cardiff University)
Tom Smith Nicki Woodhead (Vodafone UK)
Chris Peck (CTC – The National Cyclists’
Organisation) Juliet Solomon Jane Woolmer (Twcross House School)
David Pencheon (NHS Sustainable Prof Kate Soper (ISET London Metropolitan Tony Wray (Severn Trent Water Ltd)
Development Unit for England) University) Martin Wright/Peter Fraenkel (Marine
Pat Pica Kevin Soulsby Current Turbines Ltd)
Anne Power (LSE, SDC Commissioner) Elizabeth Spark Dr Einer Young (Welsh Institute for Natural
Resources, Bangor University)
Robert Pringle (Sustech Ltd) Freer Spreckley (Golden Valley Environment
Eric Pritchard Group)
Jolanda Putri Dave Stanley (e3)
1. Speech at the Woodrow Wilson International Center 23. Environmental Audit Committee (2008) Thirteenth
for Scholars in Washington. 14 May http://intranet/ Report
news/2009/defra-0515.asp
24. United Nations Environment Programme, October 2008
2. The response of civil society to climate change: New
Economics Foundation, 2008 25. Global Footprint Network (2008) Ecological Footprint
Atlas
3. Lindsey Colbourne (2008) Sustainable Development and
Resilience: A think piece for the SDC 26. Defra (2008) Sustainable Development in Your Pocket
4. From a poll undertaken for the BBC by GfK NOP during 27. HM Government (2007) Energy White Paper
October 2005. Results available at: http://news.bbc.
co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/29_03_06_happiness_ 28. Defra (2008) Sustainable Development in Your Pocket
gfkpoll.pdf
29. www.ncsl.org.uk
5. DWP data quoted by Joseph Rowntree Foundation, www.
poverty.org.uk/09/index.shtml 30. www.greenvoice.com
18. Energy Action Scotland (March 2008) Estimate of fuel 43. http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/
poor households news/2239329/legislators-propose-federal
19. For example Consumer Focus and Friends of the Earth, 44. HM Government (April 2009) Building Britain’s Future:
2009 New Industry, New Jobs
20. SDC (2008) Health, place and nature 45. Financial Times, 8 April 2009
21. Defra (2008) Sustainable Development in Your Pocket 46. See www.sd-commission.org.uk/pages/breakthroughs.
html
22. Play England (2008) Playday Survey
Left unchecked, climate change is the NESTA (National Endowment for Science, WRAP (Waste & Resources Action
greatest threat we face, and has the Technology and the Arts) is an independent Programme) encourages the efficient
potential to wreck livelihood’s and body with a mission to make the UK more use of resources by helping individuals,
ecosystems. The Co-operative is recognised innovative. We are a leading authority businesses and local authorities to reduce
as a leader in the fight against climate on how to grow new ideas and stimulate waste and recycle more. We work to create
change; we’re working hard to reduce our imaginative solutions to pressing social the case for change, support change and
emissions, help communities to reduce challenges. deliver change.
theirs, and campaigning to get the right
laws in place to speed up the transition to
a low carbon economy.
To meet the challenges presented by Ecotricity, the worlds first green electricity Willmott Dixon was recently ranked in the
climate change we need local solutions to company. Turning electricity bills into Sunday Times Best Green Companies List as
global problems. Ashden Award winners windmills. best performing contractor. The company
are breaking through barriers for a more aims to be carbon neutral and send zero
sustainable world and a better quality of waste to landfill by 2012.
life for all.
Over the next 20 years business will have Natural England wants to transform how
to change radically in order to become people connect with nature, ensuring
more sustainable and the Breakthroughs we all understand how the economic
event offers exciting and challenging and health benefits of a well-balanced
examples of the lengths we will have to go environment contribute to healthier,
to deliver change on this scale. happier communities, better able to adapt
to the impacts of climate change.
Scotland
Osborne House
1 Osborne Terrace, Haymarket
Edinburgh EH12 5HG
0131 625 1880
[email protected]
www.sd-commission.org.uk/scotland
Wales
Room 1, University of Wales,
University Registry, King Edward VII Avenue,
Cardiff CF10 3NS
029 2037 6956
[email protected]
www.sd-commission.org.uk/wales
Northern Ireland
Room E5 11, OFMDFM
Castle Buildings, Stormont Estate
Belfast BT4 3SR
028 9052 0196
[email protected]
www.sd-commission.org.uk/northern_ireland
www.sd-commission.org.uk
42 Breakthroughs for the twenty-first century Sustainable Development Commission