Cloud When and Why WP
Cloud When and Why WP
WHITE PAPER
IDC Worldwide Software as a Service 20102014 Forecast: Software Will Never Be the Same, July 2010
Key Findings
In addition to the superior cost structure and level compared to on-premise solutions that we discuss in depth in this paper, there are some other benefits for companies that choose Cloud solutions in comparison to traditional software. Looking at these in detail will help readers reach the same conclusion we did software will never be the same again.
Strategic Agility
Cloud deployments largely eliminate the need for CIOs to deal with capacity and location planning. Vendors are responsible for providing sufficient capacity and geographical coverage. This means that organizations using cloud deployments can be much more responsive to unforeseen events and business demands than companies using on-premise systems. In the latter case, organizations need to hire, procure hardware and increase operations complexity to respond to unforeseen business realities.
Improved Security
Increasingly, security is seen as a key reason to use Cloud solutions. Strict ISO standards and regular security audits have proven that Cloud solutions can be implemented to the highest security standards. This means companies can only gain by eliminating the risk of lost laptops containing sensitive information, not to mention other even more malicious threats from hacking organizations.
Time to Value
The deployment times and resource needs associated with rolling out Cloud solutions are significantly lower than with on-premise solutions. Often, Cloud solutions can go live in 2-3 quarters while on-premise solutions require 2-3 years. In addition, the resource commitment from busy IT departments is much lighter for Cloud solutions. In fact, SuccessFactors core modules for business execution have an average time from project kick-off to customer production sign-off of 110 days.
In addition to up-front costs, there are ongoing costs, including license renewals, software and hardware maintenance, and the salaries of on-staff database administrators (DBAs). After four to five years, most application software has become outdated and requires an upgrade. This upgrade typically involves a significant change to existing systems, and therefore requires re-implementation and re-configuration of systems and processes. It should be noted that in some cases these upgrades are for all practical purposes mandatory, as suppliers simply stop providing support for older versions of their application. In others cases, companies make such heavy customization to the code base they receive from the vendor that upgrading to a newer version can become almost cost prohibitive. As Graph 1 illustrates, the largest cost item for an on-premise solution is implementation. Two factors drive this: The large degree of customization required when implementing on-premise systems, which often includes expensive code modifications. The need to re-implement upgrades after 4-5 years. The second and third largest items in the on-premise cost structure relate to owning and operating the databases these systems require. Database licensing fees are substantial, and an additional 2-3 DBAs are needed on a full-time basis to maintain a 10,000 employee implementation. Somewhat surprisingly, the costs for buying, upgrading and maintaining licenses only comprize 13% of total cost. Organizations that buy a bundle of licenses need to realize that, even if the license cost is already paid for, the other 87% of costs are still present. Appendix A contains the details behind these examples.
The up-front costs for Cloud solutions consist exclusively of external configuration consultant fees and support from internal IT and HR personnel. These costs are typically much smaller than in the on-premise case. The reason is that software in the Cloud is typically configured to meet special customer needs, a process which involves activities like checking a series of boxes that control system options. In contrast, on-premise systems are implemented, which is a much more complex process that may involve writing code. With the configuration option, customization is sometimes limited, but the need to re-invent the wheel for every customer is also removed. On-going costs for Cloud solutions consist of subscription fees and nothing else. All other costs are the responsibility of the vendor. Additionally, since Cloud-based solutions are updated several times per year as part of the agreement, the need to purchase software upgrades and re-implement every 4-5 years is removed.
Graph 3 shows typical costs of an on-premise HRIS solution for a 10,000 employee company vs. the costs for an equivalent Cloud-based solution. The cost increase in year 5 is absent because, as noted, Cloud deployments feature continuous updates that do not require upgrades or re-implementation.
To compare the cost structure of Cloud solutions vs. on-premise solutions in an apples-to-apples fashion, it is useful to split the comparison into items that provide the same customer benefit: In the case of implementation costs, those for an on-premise solution and those for a Cloud solution are directly comparable. In the case of ongoing operations, the Cloud subscription costs are equivalent to the sum of hardware costs, licensing costs, database licensing costs and DBA salaries in an on-premise solution. The Cloud-based system implementation costs are 20-30% of the on-premise cost for two main reasons: There is no need to re-implement the solution after 4-5 years Simpler implementation because Cloud models remove the need for customization.
Having explained the difference in implementation costs, we will now compare Cloud subscription costs to the remaining cost items for on-premise solutions: hardware, license, and database costs. The largest of these is database license and operations. Cloud vendors have built their applications to achieve great economies of scale, and can operate their data centers at a fraction of the cost compared to on-premise solutions operated by on-staff personnel. Graph 4 shows clearly that this cost efficiency is passed directly on to Cloud customers.
10
Conclusion
Faster Time to Value, Lower Cost
In summary, we found Cloud solutions typically provide the same or better functionality at a significantly lower cost, and with additional strategic advantages such as agility and short deployment times. Even so, many companies still struggle with these decisions. The most common reason is they neglect to include all relevant cost factors in their analysis. For example, they may compare the on-premise license cost to the Cloud solution subscription fee, assuming they are making an apples-to-apples comparison. In this paper we have shown that this is not the case, and will lead to an erroneous business decision since Cloud vendor license costs cover a large range of costs borne by the customer in the on-premise case. Examples include database staff and database licenses. Any evaluation of investments needs to fully account for costs and benefits of all alternatives. When comparing Cloud to on-premise solutions, all the data shown in Table 1 should be collected for on-premise solutions.
11
Appendix
Cost Details
This appendix contains the detailed cost drivers and the cost structure for the 10,000 employee on-premise implementation used in this whitepaper.
12
Table B: 5-year Cost to Own On-Premise Systems, 10,000 Employee On-Premise Implementation
Total Cost On-Premise Software Costs License Cost License Maintenance Upgrade Fee Database License Cost HW Costs Servers Server Maintenance People & Implementation Implementation Consulting Implementation Internal On-staff DBA Unit ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) NVP 6,709 - - - - - - - - - - - - Year 1 3,780 800 500 - - 300 130 120 10 2,850 1,500 900 450 Year 2 870 410 - 110 - 300 10 - 10 450 - - 450 Year 3 870 410 - 110 Year 4 870 410 - 110 Year 5 2,848 660 110 250 300 130 120 10 2,058 1,005 603 450
13
SuccessFactors Global Headquarters 1500 Fashion Island Blvd. Suite 300 San Mateo, CA 94404, USA
TOLL FREE 800 809 9920 PHONE 650 645 2000 FAX 650 645 2099 EMEA +45 33 349 349 APAC +612 9238 6680
successfactors.com
San Mateo, California Boston, Massachusetts San Francisco, California Copenhagen, Denmark Paris, France Munich, Germany Zrich, Switzerland
London, United Kingdom Beijing, China Hong Kong, China Tokyo, Japan Manila, Phillipines Singapore Seoul, South Korea
Sao Paulo, Brazil Mexico City, Mexico Dublin, Ireland Shanghai, China Bangalore, India Brisbane, Australia Sydney, Australia